about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,803 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts and the second variable is Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air.  The chart goes from 1982 to 2008, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts went up, it led to a spike in demand for limited government intervention. This somehow translated to a belief that even the brakes and air in cars should be left to self-regulate, leading to a wave of automotive recalls for service brakes and air issues. It's as if the cars were trying to assert their individual freedom to function however they pleased, much to the frustration of their drivers!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] In a bustling urban setting in Massachusetts, the streets are filled with cars of all makes and models. The scene showcases a montage of vehicles exhibiting unexpected behavior, with some cars engaging in seemingly impromptu brake checks at red lights, while others appear to adjust their tire pressure and alignment of their own accord. The atmosphere is one of perplexed onlookers and bewildered drivers as they navigate the erratic antics of their vehicular counterparts. The image captures the chaotic nature of the automotive world as cars, inspired by the call for limited government intervention, assert their independence in regulating their own mechanisms. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie A photo-realistic image a Polaroid photo Celtic art
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air, in the following situation: As the number of Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts went up, it led to a spike in demand for limited government intervention. This somehow translated to a belief that even the brakes and air in cars should be left to self-regulate, leading to a wave of automotive recalls for service brakes and air issues. It's as if the cars were trying to assert their individual freedom to function however they pleased, much to the frustration of their drivers!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Massachusetts, as more votes poured in for Libertarian Senators, the call for limited government intervention grew stronger. This led to a curious occurrence in the automotive world: cars, seemingly emboldened by the spirit of non-intervention, began asserting their independence in regulating their own service brakes and air. As a result, a flurry of automotive recalls ensued, as cars insisted on exercising their freedom to function as they pleased, much to the exasperation of their drivers.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In Massachusetts, as more votes poured in for Libertarian Senators, the call for limited government intervention grew stronger. This led to a curious occurrence in the automotive world: cars, seemingly emboldened by the spirit of non-intervention, began asserting their independence in regulating their own service brakes and air. As a result, a flurry of automotive recalls ensued, as cars insisted on exercising their freedom to function as they pleased, much to the exasperation of their drivers. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A photo-realistic image ] In a bustling urban setting in Massachusetts, the streets are filled with cars of all makes and models. The scene showcases a montage of vehicles exhibiting unexpected behavior, with some cars engaging in seemingly impromptu brake checks at red lights, while others appear to adjust their tire pressure and alignment of their own accord. The atmosphere is one of perplexed onlookers and bewildered drivers as they navigate the erratic antics of their vehicular counterparts. The image captures the chaotic nature of the automotive world as cars, inspired by the call for limited government intervention, assert their independence in regulating their own mechanisms.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts caused Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Braking the Norm: A Correlation between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air

The Journal of Quirky Correlations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9832789 and p < 0.01 for 1982 to 2008.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Braking the Norm: A Correlation between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to unravel the enigma of a highly peculiar association between the voting behavior of Libertarians in the state of Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for service brakes, air, over a period spanning 1982 to 2008. Utilizing data from the esteemed MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a meticulous analysis. Results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9832789 and p < 0.01, suggesting a connection that cannot be easily dismissed. While causality remains elusive, this unforeseen link between political leanings and vehicular safety warrants further investigation and offers a lighthearted twist in the intricate web of civic engagement and consumer behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Braking the Norm: A Correlation between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to unravel the enigma of a highly peculiar association between the voting behavior of Libertarians in the state of Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for service brakes, air, over a period spanning 1982 to 2008. Utilizing data from the esteemed MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a meticulous analysis. Results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9832789 and p < 0.01, suggesting a connection that cannot be easily dismissed. While causality remains elusive, this unforeseen link between political leanings and vehicular safety warrants further investigation and offers a lighthearted twist in the intricate web of civic engagement and consumer behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As researchers, we are often on the lookout for unexpected connections, the kind that seem to defy logic and reason, and offer us a healthy dose of scientific intrigue. Enter the fascinating nexus that we are here to explore - the curious relationship between the voting patterns of Libertarians in Massachusetts and the occurrence of automotive recalls for service brakes, air. While these might appear to be as related as apples and orangutans, our data-driven analysis promises to dazzle and confound in equal measure.

In this paper, we venture into the uncharted territory of political science and automotive engineering, bringing to light a correlation that is as perplexing as it is statistically significant. We assure you, dear reader, this is not your run-of-the-mill academic investigation; we are about to embark on a journey riddled with puns, statistics, and a charming dash of whimsy.

Traditionally, political science and vehicular safety have inhabited separate spheres, but our findings suggest a convergence that defies convention. Right from the onset, our curiosity was piqued - could there truly be a connection between the voting behavior of Libertarians and the performance of service brakes, air, in automobiles? The answer, as it turns out, is a resounding "yes."

Please fasten your seatbelts, as we delve into this curious avenue of inquiry, navigating the realms of data analysis and statistical significance with a twinkle in our eye and a healthy appreciation for the incongruous twist that this research endeavor has revealed. Let's hit the brakes on convention and accelerate into the realm of unexpected correlations, shall we?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Braking the Norm: A Correlation between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to unravel the enigma of a highly peculiar association between the voting behavior of Libertarians in the state of Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for service brakes, air, over a period spanning 1982 to 2008. Utilizing data from the esteemed MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a meticulous analysis. Results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9832789 and p < 0.01, suggesting a connection that cannot be easily dismissed. While causality remains elusive, this unforeseen link between political leanings and vehicular safety warrants further investigation and offers a lighthearted twist in the intricate web of civic engagement and consumer behavior.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As researchers, we are often on the lookout for unexpected connections, the kind that seem to defy logic and reason, and offer us a healthy dose of scientific intrigue. Enter the fascinating nexus that we are here to explore - the curious relationship between the voting patterns of Libertarians in Massachusetts and the occurrence of automotive recalls for service brakes, air. While these might appear to be as related as apples and orangutans, our data-driven analysis promises to dazzle and confound in equal measure.
In this paper, we venture into the uncharted territory of political science and automotive engineering, bringing to light a correlation that is as perplexing as it is statistically significant. We assure you, dear reader, this is not your run-of-the-mill academic investigation; we are about to embark on a journey riddled with puns, statistics, and a charming dash of whimsy.
Traditionally, political science and vehicular safety have inhabited separate spheres, but our findings suggest a convergence that defies convention. Right from the onset, our curiosity was piqued - could there truly be a connection between the voting behavior of Libertarians and the performance of service brakes, air, in automobiles? The answer, as it turns out, is a resounding "yes."
Please fasten your seatbelts, as we delve into this curious avenue of inquiry, navigating the realms of data analysis and statistical significance with a twinkle in our eye and a healthy appreciation for the incongruous twist that this research endeavor has revealed. Let's hit the brakes on convention and accelerate into the realm of unexpected correlations, shall we?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literary landscape on the correlation between political affiliations and vehicular safety reveals a peculiar blend of serious scientific inquiry, whimsical interpretations, and the occasional dive into the abyss of absurdity. Smith (2015) insightfully outlines the intricate dynamics of political behavior, while Doe (2018) offers a meticulous analysis of automotive recalls, both providing solid groundwork for our own investigation. Jones (2017) delves into the psychological underpinnings of voting, a theme that aligns surprisingly well with the unpredictable twists of consumer vehicle choices and safety implications.

On the periphery of our research lies a vast array of non-fiction literature that could potentially shed light on our enigmatic findings. "Traffic: Why We Drive the Way We Do" by Tom Vanderbilt and "Unsafe at Any Speed" by Ralph Nader emerge as potent contenders for supplementing our understanding, offering poignant insights into the intricacies of vehicular safety and the idiosyncrasies of driver behavior. However, delving into the realm of fiction, "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald and "The Road" by Cormac McCarthy, although seemingly unrelated, evoke the essence of freedom on the open road - a theme intricately entwined with the spirit of Libertarianism and the joys of automotive independence.

In a twist of fate, the cinematic universe also presents intriguing parallels. "The Fast and the Furious" franchise, with its high-octane escapades, offers a tantalizing juxtaposition to the measured stride of political elections, while "Election", directed by Alexander Payne, reminds us that even in the serious realm of politics, a touch of humor and unexpected turns can prevail.

As we wade through this rich tapestry of sources, it becomes abundantly clear that our research endeavor straddles the boundaries of the ordinary and the extraordinary, a fact that we embrace with open arms and a generous sprinkle of academic mirth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT . You used data from 1982 to 2008

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Braking the Norm: A Correlation between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to unravel the enigma of a highly peculiar association between the voting behavior of Libertarians in the state of Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for service brakes, air, over a period spanning 1982 to 2008. Utilizing data from the esteemed MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a meticulous analysis. Results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9832789 and p < 0.01, suggesting a connection that cannot be easily dismissed. While causality remains elusive, this unforeseen link between political leanings and vehicular safety warrants further investigation and offers a lighthearted twist in the intricate web of civic engagement and consumer behavior.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As researchers, we are often on the lookout for unexpected connections, the kind that seem to defy logic and reason, and offer us a healthy dose of scientific intrigue. Enter the fascinating nexus that we are here to explore - the curious relationship between the voting patterns of Libertarians in Massachusetts and the occurrence of automotive recalls for service brakes, air. While these might appear to be as related as apples and orangutans, our data-driven analysis promises to dazzle and confound in equal measure.
In this paper, we venture into the uncharted territory of political science and automotive engineering, bringing to light a correlation that is as perplexing as it is statistically significant. We assure you, dear reader, this is not your run-of-the-mill academic investigation; we are about to embark on a journey riddled with puns, statistics, and a charming dash of whimsy.
Traditionally, political science and vehicular safety have inhabited separate spheres, but our findings suggest a convergence that defies convention. Right from the onset, our curiosity was piqued - could there truly be a connection between the voting behavior of Libertarians and the performance of service brakes, air, in automobiles? The answer, as it turns out, is a resounding "yes."
Please fasten your seatbelts, as we delve into this curious avenue of inquiry, navigating the realms of data analysis and statistical significance with a twinkle in our eye and a healthy appreciation for the incongruous twist that this research endeavor has revealed. Let's hit the brakes on convention and accelerate into the realm of unexpected correlations, shall we?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the perplexing relationship between the voting behavior of Libertarians in Massachusetts and the occurrence of automotive recalls for service brakes, air, we employed a multifaceted and, dare we say, whimsically convoluted research methodology.

First and foremost, data on Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts was meticulously sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab. This treasure trove of political preference offered a rich tapestry of electoral leaning, revealing the quirks and fancies of the state's Libertarians over the years. By delighting in the intricacies of our dataset, we indulged in an almost Sherlockian pursuit of uncovering the fine details that would eventually weave into the fabric of our findings.

Next, in a dashing display of academic bravado, we danced into the Harvard Dataverse, where automotive recall data for service brakes, air, held court. The US Department of Transportation, in its repository of vehicular woes, provided us with the key ingredient for our statistical soufflé – a comprehensive history of automotive recalls that would serve as the delectable focus of our inquiry. With the air of treasure hunters, we sifted through the sea of recall notices, searching for the telltale signs of a correlation waiting to be unearthed.

The time-span of 1982 to 2008 was our chosen playground, a veritable sandbox of political sway and automotive fallibility. Within this era, we traced the ebb and flow of Libertarian votes against the backdrop of automotive recalls, capturing the delightful capriciousness of chosen Senatorial sirens and the somber lamentations of vehicular malfunctions.

Building the link between these seemingly incongruous variables was no mean feat. Utilizing specialized statistical software, we summoned the powers of correlation analysis, regression modeling, and hypothesis testing to bow before the altar of scientific rigor. With the fervor of mad scientists conducting a symphony, we allowed the data to weave its tale, all the while tickling the ivories of statistical significance and reveling in the serendipity of a correlation coefficient that sparkled like stardust.

After months of dedicated toil and an endless supply of caffeine-fueled brainstorming sessions, our methodology culminated in the grand revelation of a correlation coefficient of 0.9832789, enrobed in the sacred garb of p < 0.01. This delightful proclamation beckoned us into the realm of bewilderment and mirth, as we pondered the implications of our findings with an air of academic mischievousness.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT .

For the time period 1982 to 2008, you found a correlation 0.9832789, r-squared of 0.9668374, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Braking the Norm: A Correlation between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to unravel the enigma of a highly peculiar association between the voting behavior of Libertarians in the state of Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for service brakes, air, over a period spanning 1982 to 2008. Utilizing data from the esteemed MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a meticulous analysis. Results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9832789 and p < 0.01, suggesting a connection that cannot be easily dismissed. While causality remains elusive, this unforeseen link between political leanings and vehicular safety warrants further investigation and offers a lighthearted twist in the intricate web of civic engagement and consumer behavior.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As researchers, we are often on the lookout for unexpected connections, the kind that seem to defy logic and reason, and offer us a healthy dose of scientific intrigue. Enter the fascinating nexus that we are here to explore - the curious relationship between the voting patterns of Libertarians in Massachusetts and the occurrence of automotive recalls for service brakes, air. While these might appear to be as related as apples and orangutans, our data-driven analysis promises to dazzle and confound in equal measure.
In this paper, we venture into the uncharted territory of political science and automotive engineering, bringing to light a correlation that is as perplexing as it is statistically significant. We assure you, dear reader, this is not your run-of-the-mill academic investigation; we are about to embark on a journey riddled with puns, statistics, and a charming dash of whimsy.
Traditionally, political science and vehicular safety have inhabited separate spheres, but our findings suggest a convergence that defies convention. Right from the onset, our curiosity was piqued - could there truly be a connection between the voting behavior of Libertarians and the performance of service brakes, air, in automobiles? The answer, as it turns out, is a resounding "yes."
Please fasten your seatbelts, as we delve into this curious avenue of inquiry, navigating the realms of data analysis and statistical significance with a twinkle in our eye and a healthy appreciation for the incongruous twist that this research endeavor has revealed. Let's hit the brakes on convention and accelerate into the realm of unexpected correlations, shall we?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air during the period of 1982 to 2008 have left us both intrigued and bemused. The statistical analysis revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9832789, with an r-squared value of 0.9668374, and a p-value that practically screamed "statistically significant" at p < 0.01. In other words, we stumbled upon a connection that is as strong as the brakes on a brand-new sports car – no skidding here!

Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot that looks more like a match made in statistical heaven, with the Libertarian votes and automotive recalls embracing each other in a close and intimate dance of correlation. It's truly a sight to behold, and we couldn't resist the urge to frame it on the wall of our research lab. The data points are as tightly packed as sardines in a can – or, dare we say, as tightly packed as sardines in a car? Talk about statistical "braking" news!

While we are reluctant to jump the gun and assert causation at this juncture, the strength of the correlation leaves us tantalizingly close to unraveling the mystery behind this improbable association. Our findings suggest that as Libertarian votes increase, so do the occurrences of automotive recalls for service brakes, air, in a synchronized duet that defies conventional wisdom. It's a correlation that defies the traditional boundaries of statistical inquiry – much like an unexpected romance between unlikely partners, it has left us both startled and amused.

In summary, our research has unveiled an unforeseen relationship that has implications not only for the world of political science and automotive engineering but also for the enduring pursuit of scientific discovery. As we ponder the implications of our findings, we are reminded of the captivating and occasionally confounding nature of science, where the most unexpected connections can lead to a blend of amusement and astonishment. This, dear readers, is the essence of scientific inquiry at its quirkiest.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Braking the Norm: A Correlation between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to unravel the enigma of a highly peculiar association between the voting behavior of Libertarians in the state of Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for service brakes, air, over a period spanning 1982 to 2008. Utilizing data from the esteemed MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a meticulous analysis. Results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9832789 and p < 0.01, suggesting a connection that cannot be easily dismissed. While causality remains elusive, this unforeseen link between political leanings and vehicular safety warrants further investigation and offers a lighthearted twist in the intricate web of civic engagement and consumer behavior.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literary landscape on the correlation between political affiliations and vehicular safety reveals a peculiar blend of serious scientific inquiry, whimsical interpretations, and the occasional dive into the abyss of absurdity. Smith (2015) insightfully outlines the intricate dynamics of political behavior, while Doe (2018) offers a meticulous analysis of automotive recalls, both providing solid groundwork for our own investigation. Jones (2017) delves into the psychological underpinnings of voting, a theme that aligns surprisingly well with the unpredictable twists of consumer vehicle choices and safety implications.
On the periphery of our research lies a vast array of non-fiction literature that could potentially shed light on our enigmatic findings. "Traffic: Why We Drive the Way We Do" by Tom Vanderbilt and "Unsafe at Any Speed" by Ralph Nader emerge as potent contenders for supplementing our understanding, offering poignant insights into the intricacies of vehicular safety and the idiosyncrasies of driver behavior. However, delving into the realm of fiction, "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald and "The Road" by Cormac McCarthy, although seemingly unrelated, evoke the essence of freedom on the open road - a theme intricately entwined with the spirit of Libertarianism and the joys of automotive independence.
In a twist of fate, the cinematic universe also presents intriguing parallels. "The Fast and the Furious" franchise, with its high-octane escapades, offers a tantalizing juxtaposition to the measured stride of political elections, while "Election", directed by Alexander Payne, reminds us that even in the serious realm of politics, a touch of humor and unexpected turns can prevail.
As we wade through this rich tapestry of sources, it becomes abundantly clear that our research endeavor straddles the boundaries of the ordinary and the extraordinary, a fact that we embrace with open arms and a generous sprinkle of academic mirth.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air during the period of 1982 to 2008 have left us both intrigued and bemused. The statistical analysis revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9832789, with an r-squared value of 0.9668374, and a p-value that practically screamed "statistically significant" at p < 0.01. In other words, we stumbled upon a connection that is as strong as the brakes on a brand-new sports car – no skidding here!
Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot that looks more like a match made in statistical heaven, with the Libertarian votes and automotive recalls embracing each other in a close and intimate dance of correlation. It's truly a sight to behold, and we couldn't resist the urge to frame it on the wall of our research lab. The data points are as tightly packed as sardines in a can – or, dare we say, as tightly packed as sardines in a car? Talk about statistical "braking" news!
While we are reluctant to jump the gun and assert causation at this juncture, the strength of the correlation leaves us tantalizingly close to unraveling the mystery behind this improbable association. Our findings suggest that as Libertarian votes increase, so do the occurrences of automotive recalls for service brakes, air, in a synchronized duet that defies conventional wisdom. It's a correlation that defies the traditional boundaries of statistical inquiry – much like an unexpected romance between unlikely partners, it has left us both startled and amused.
In summary, our research has unveiled an unforeseen relationship that has implications not only for the world of political science and automotive engineering but also for the enduring pursuit of scientific discovery. As we ponder the implications of our findings, we are reminded of the captivating and occasionally confounding nature of science, where the most unexpected connections can lead to a blend of amusement and astonishment. This, dear readers, is the essence of scientific inquiry at its quirkiest.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The confluence of political affiliations and vehicular safety has long been a matter of scholarly intrigue, but our study has unveiled a correlation that borders on the whimsical. Much like a Formula 1 race car hurtling down a circuit, our findings have veered into unexpected territory, offering a delightful twist in the annals of empirical inquiry.

Our results have fortuitously aligned with the prior research, affirming the insightful groundwork laid by Smith (2015) and Doe (2018). The unexpected correlation coefficient of 0.9832789 mirrors the meticulous analysis by our esteemed colleagues, providing a harmonious resonance with the scholarly discourse on the topic. It seems that the idiosyncrasies of political behavior and the capricious nature of automotive recalls have found a harmonious confluence, much like the serendipitous alignment of planets in the cosmic ballet of the universe – or perhaps in this case, the automotive universe.

Turning our attention back to the literary review, while the inclusion of "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald and "The Road" by Cormac McCarthy once seemed rather outlandish, the essence of freedom on the open road has acquired new significance in light of our findings. It appears that the spirit of Libertarianism and the joie de vivre of automotive independence may indeed exert a subtle influence on vehicular safety, as unpredictably delightful as a plot twist in a novel.

In bridging the realms of scientific rigor and unexpected amusement, our study has also inadvertently echoed the parallels drawn from the cinematic universe. The measured stride of political engagement appears to have shared a clenched-fist high-five with the high-octane escapades of "The Fast and the Furious" franchise, symbolizing the thrilling convergence of statistical inquiry and cinematic delight. Much like the unexpected narrative turns in "Election", our findings remind us that even in the solemn endeavor of scholarly pursuit, a dash of humor can bolster the spirit of inquiry.

As we wade through the rich tapestry of our findings, we are reminded that science, research, and statistics are not merely the pursuit of empirical knowledge but also the unearthing of unexpected connections that evoke a blend of amusement and wonder. Our correlation, in all its statistical brilliance, encapsulates the whimsical charm and the intellectual curiosity that define the extraordinary essence of scientific inquiry at its quirkiest.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Braking the Norm: A Correlation between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to unravel the enigma of a highly peculiar association between the voting behavior of Libertarians in the state of Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for service brakes, air, over a period spanning 1982 to 2008. Utilizing data from the esteemed MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a meticulous analysis. Results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9832789 and p < 0.01, suggesting a connection that cannot be easily dismissed. While causality remains elusive, this unforeseen link between political leanings and vehicular safety warrants further investigation and offers a lighthearted twist in the intricate web of civic engagement and consumer behavior.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As researchers, we are often on the lookout for unexpected connections, the kind that seem to defy logic and reason, and offer us a healthy dose of scientific intrigue. Enter the fascinating nexus that we are here to explore - the curious relationship between the voting patterns of Libertarians in Massachusetts and the occurrence of automotive recalls for service brakes, air. While these might appear to be as related as apples and orangutans, our data-driven analysis promises to dazzle and confound in equal measure.
In this paper, we venture into the uncharted territory of political science and automotive engineering, bringing to light a correlation that is as perplexing as it is statistically significant. We assure you, dear reader, this is not your run-of-the-mill academic investigation; we are about to embark on a journey riddled with puns, statistics, and a charming dash of whimsy.
Traditionally, political science and vehicular safety have inhabited separate spheres, but our findings suggest a convergence that defies convention. Right from the onset, our curiosity was piqued - could there truly be a connection between the voting behavior of Libertarians and the performance of service brakes, air, in automobiles? The answer, as it turns out, is a resounding "yes."
Please fasten your seatbelts, as we delve into this curious avenue of inquiry, navigating the realms of data analysis and statistical significance with a twinkle in our eye and a healthy appreciation for the incongruous twist that this research endeavor has revealed. Let's hit the brakes on convention and accelerate into the realm of unexpected correlations, shall we?

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air during the period of 1982 to 2008 have left us both intrigued and bemused. The statistical analysis revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9832789, with an r-squared value of 0.9668374, and a p-value that practically screamed "statistically significant" at p < 0.01. In other words, we stumbled upon a connection that is as strong as the brakes on a brand-new sports car – no skidding here!
Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot that looks more like a match made in statistical heaven, with the Libertarian votes and automotive recalls embracing each other in a close and intimate dance of correlation. It's truly a sight to behold, and we couldn't resist the urge to frame it on the wall of our research lab. The data points are as tightly packed as sardines in a can – or, dare we say, as tightly packed as sardines in a car? Talk about statistical "braking" news!
While we are reluctant to jump the gun and assert causation at this juncture, the strength of the correlation leaves us tantalizingly close to unraveling the mystery behind this improbable association. Our findings suggest that as Libertarian votes increase, so do the occurrences of automotive recalls for service brakes, air, in a synchronized duet that defies conventional wisdom. It's a correlation that defies the traditional boundaries of statistical inquiry – much like an unexpected romance between unlikely partners, it has left us both startled and amused.
In summary, our research has unveiled an unforeseen relationship that has implications not only for the world of political science and automotive engineering but also for the enduring pursuit of scientific discovery. As we ponder the implications of our findings, we are reminded of the captivating and occasionally confounding nature of science, where the most unexpected connections can lead to a blend of amusement and astonishment. This, dear readers, is the essence of scientific inquiry at its quirkiest.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the enthralling correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air has unveiled a statistical relationship worthy of both bemusement and admiration. Our findings offer a refreshing reminder that the world of research is not devoid of whimsy and unexpected surprises.

As we bring our journey to an end, we are reminded that in the realm of science, even the most peculiar and seemingly improbable connections can hold a kernel of truth. Much like a scientific onion, this correlation has layers of complexity and flavor, leaving us both teary-eyed and exuberant.

It's like stumbling upon a rare species of statistical butterfly in the midst of a data-rich meadow – a delightful and unexpected encounter that sparks joy and curiosity in equal measure.

While we are tempted to dive deeper into the realms of causality and underlying mechanisms, our findings beckon us to embrace the uncertainty and revel in the sheer astonishment of the correlation at hand. The perplexing dance between political leanings and vehicular safety has left us both scratching our heads and grinning with amusement, reminding us that in the world of research, there's always room for a hearty chuckle amidst the p-values and correlation coefficients.

In the spirit of scientific inquiry, we assert that this unexpected correlation between politics and braking systems is a delightful conundrum deserving of further contemplation and a healthy dose of scientific mirth. However, in the lighthearted words of the great scientific sage, Albert Einstein, "No amount of research can unravel the mysteries of a good punchline." Therefore, we confidently assert that no further research is needed in this particular area, for the world of science can always use a good statistical chuckle.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Braking the Norm: A Correlation between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Braking the Norm: A Correlation between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Automotive Civic Liberties and Advanced Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Braking the Norm: A Correlation between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air with an abstract of This study seeks to unravel the enigma of a highly peculiar association between the voting behavior of Libertarians in the state of Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for service brakes, air, over a period spanning 1982 to 2008. Utilizing data from the esteemed MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a meticulous analysis. Results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9832789 and p < 0.01, suggesting a connection that cannot be easily dismissed. While causality remains elusive, this unforeseen link between political leanings and vehicular safety warrants further investigation and offers a lighthearted twist in the intricate web of civic engagement and consumer behavior.

ChatGPT:

voting behavior, Libertarians, Massachusetts, automotive recalls, service brakes, air, correlation, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, US Department of Transportation, political leanings, vehicular safety, civic engagement, consumer behavior

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts
Detailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Libertarian Senate candidates in Massachusetts
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts

Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air

Correlation r = 0.9832789 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9668374 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 96.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts) over the 6 years from 1982 through 2008.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00042. 0.0004170555180103401000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 0.042% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,398 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.85, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198219881994200020022008
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts (Total votes)18878131991448430886036980793713
Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air (Recalls)71010436419




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([18878,13199,14484,308860,369807,93713,])
array_2 = np.array([7,10,10,43,64,19,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 5803 · Black Variable ID: 26255 · Red Variable ID: 1103
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0