about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,590 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Lance and the second variable is Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland.  The chart goes from 1976 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Perhaps as the name Lance dwindled in popularity, so did the enthusiasm for a certain candidate, ultimately leading to a decrease in Republican votes in Maryland. It seems the connection between popularity and votes really did come down to a Lance slide.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a playground at twilight, with Lance alone on a swing set in the foreground. The setting sun casts a melancholic light over the scene. In the distance, a group of friends is gradually dispersing, leaving Lance behind. A banner for the Republican candidate in Maryland is being taken down, symbolizing the diminishing support for the candidate. The slide on the playground reflects the dwindling popularity of the name Lance, mirroring the declining support for the candidate's votes. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Lance and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting Low poly An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Cute 2D animation A Discovery magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Lance and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland, in the following situation: Perhaps as the name Lance dwindled in popularity, so did the enthusiasm for a certain candidate, ultimately leading to a decrease in Republican votes in Maryland. It seems the connection between popularity and votes really did come down to a Lance slide.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a playground, a boy named Lance used to be surrounded by a big group of friends, all happy and cheering for him. As time went by, his friends gradually drifted away, leaving Lance alone on the swing set. Meanwhile, in the distance, a banner for the Republican candidate in Maryland was being taken down as the number of votes dwindled. The slide on the playground echoed the declining popularity of the name Lance, mirroring the decreasing support for the candidate.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a playground, a boy named Lance used to be surrounded by a big group of friends, all happy and cheering for him. As time went by, his friends gradually drifted away, leaving Lance alone on the swing set. Meanwhile, in the distance, a banner for the Republican candidate in Maryland was being taken down as the number of votes dwindled. The slide on the playground echoed the declining popularity of the name Lance, mirroring the decreasing support for the candidate. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a playground at twilight, with Lance alone on a swing set in the foreground. The setting sun casts a melancholic light over the scene. In the distance, a group of friends is gradually dispersing, leaving Lance behind. A banner for the Republican candidate in Maryland is being taken down, symbolizing the diminishing support for the candidate. The slide on the playground reflects the dwindling popularity of the name Lance, mirroring the declining support for the candidate's votes.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Lance caused Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Loving Lance: Linking the Likelihood of Voting for the GOP in Maryland to the Popularity of the First Name Lance

The Journal of Quirky Social Science Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lance and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8340877 and p < 0.01 for 1976 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Loving Lance: Linking the Likelihood of Voting for the GOP in Maryland to the Popularity of the First Name "Lance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research endeavors to playfully probe the peculiar relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Lance" and the predilection for casting votes in favor of Republican presidential candidates in the state of Maryland. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, our study spanned the years 1976 to 2020. We astoundingly unearthed a positively robust correlation coefficient of 0.8340877, with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01. These results whimsically suggest that there may indeed exist a curious connection between the charismatic charm of the name "Lance" and the propensity to endorse the political pursuits of the Grand Old Party in the Free State of Maryland. Our findings add a lighthearted twist to the dynamics of name popularity and political preferences, and may inspire further whimsical inquiries into the intriguing interplay of nomenclature and voting inclinations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lance and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Loving Lance: Linking the Likelihood of Voting for the GOP in Maryland to the Popularity of the First Name "Lance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research endeavors to playfully probe the peculiar relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Lance" and the predilection for casting votes in favor of Republican presidential candidates in the state of Maryland. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, our study spanned the years 1976 to 2020. We astoundingly unearthed a positively robust correlation coefficient of 0.8340877, with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01. These results whimsically suggest that there may indeed exist a curious connection between the charismatic charm of the name "Lance" and the propensity to endorse the political pursuits of the Grand Old Party in the Free State of Maryland. Our findings add a lighthearted twist to the dynamics of name popularity and political preferences, and may inspire further whimsical inquiries into the intriguing interplay of nomenclature and voting inclinations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

The intersection of statistical analysis and wordplay often yields unexpected discoveries, and our latest foray into this enigmatic realm has unearthed a connection that is as amusing as it is bewildering. We present our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lance" and the proclivity to vote for Republican presidential candidates in the captivating state of Maryland. This endeavor is fueled by a delightfully peculiar curiosity and a dose of whimsy, as we embark on a journey to unravel the potential impact of nomenclature on political allegiance.

As we delve into this jovial jaunt through the data, we must acknowledge the seemingly whimsical nature of our inquiry. Names, after all, are but arbitrary sequences of letters chosen by parents or individuals, often devoid of any overt political connotations. However, as scholars of statistics, we are compelled to recognize that correlations can emerge from the most unexpected of places, and sometimes, a name might just have a statistical tale to tell.

With a twinkle in our eyes and a firm grip on our regression analyses, we set out to explore this charmingly unconventional connection. Drawing upon a comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration, in conjunction with the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and harmoniously complemented by the Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously scrutinized the records spanning from 1976 to 2020. Our dedication to this pursuit was unwavering, for we were determined to sift through the sea of data and tease out any gleams of connection between the name "Lance" and the political leanings of Maryland's voters.

As we unraveled the whimsically winding road of statistical analysis, it didn't take long for patterns to emerge. Our findings, much to our amusement, revealed a positively robust correlation coefficient of 0.8340877, with a p-value that elicited a knowing chuckle - less than 0.01. These numbers, in the realm of statistical banter, spoke volumes about the potential link between the resounding resonance of the name "Lance" and the harmonious embrace of Republican ideals in Maryland.

So here we are, poised to present the captivating results of our jovial exploration into the curious correlation between nomenclature and political preferences. It is our hope that our findings will inspire a giggle, perhaps even a wry grin, as they add a whimsical twist to the scholarly discourse on the interplay of names and voting inclinations. With that in mind, dear reader, let us embark on this playful journey through the parallel realms of name popularity and political proclivities.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lance and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Loving Lance: Linking the Likelihood of Voting for the GOP in Maryland to the Popularity of the First Name "Lance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research endeavors to playfully probe the peculiar relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Lance" and the predilection for casting votes in favor of Republican presidential candidates in the state of Maryland. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, our study spanned the years 1976 to 2020. We astoundingly unearthed a positively robust correlation coefficient of 0.8340877, with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01. These results whimsically suggest that there may indeed exist a curious connection between the charismatic charm of the name "Lance" and the propensity to endorse the political pursuits of the Grand Old Party in the Free State of Maryland. Our findings add a lighthearted twist to the dynamics of name popularity and political preferences, and may inspire further whimsical inquiries into the intriguing interplay of nomenclature and voting inclinations.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The intersection of statistical analysis and wordplay often yields unexpected discoveries, and our latest foray into this enigmatic realm has unearthed a connection that is as amusing as it is bewildering. We present our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lance" and the proclivity to vote for Republican presidential candidates in the captivating state of Maryland. This endeavor is fueled by a delightfully peculiar curiosity and a dose of whimsy, as we embark on a journey to unravel the potential impact of nomenclature on political allegiance.
As we delve into this jovial jaunt through the data, we must acknowledge the seemingly whimsical nature of our inquiry. Names, after all, are but arbitrary sequences of letters chosen by parents or individuals, often devoid of any overt political connotations. However, as scholars of statistics, we are compelled to recognize that correlations can emerge from the most unexpected of places, and sometimes, a name might just have a statistical tale to tell.
With a twinkle in our eyes and a firm grip on our regression analyses, we set out to explore this charmingly unconventional connection. Drawing upon a comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration, in conjunction with the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and harmoniously complemented by the Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously scrutinized the records spanning from 1976 to 2020. Our dedication to this pursuit was unwavering, for we were determined to sift through the sea of data and tease out any gleams of connection between the name "Lance" and the political leanings of Maryland's voters.
As we unraveled the whimsically winding road of statistical analysis, it didn't take long for patterns to emerge. Our findings, much to our amusement, revealed a positively robust correlation coefficient of 0.8340877, with a p-value that elicited a knowing chuckle - less than 0.01. These numbers, in the realm of statistical banter, spoke volumes about the potential link between the resounding resonance of the name "Lance" and the harmonious embrace of Republican ideals in Maryland.
So here we are, poised to present the captivating results of our jovial exploration into the curious correlation between nomenclature and political preferences. It is our hope that our findings will inspire a giggle, perhaps even a wry grin, as they add a whimsical twist to the scholarly discourse on the interplay of names and voting inclinations. With that in mind, dear reader, let us embark on this playful journey through the parallel realms of name popularity and political proclivities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The notion of appellative influence on various aspects of life has sparked a vigorous, albeit at times whimsical, discourse in both scholarly and informal circles alike. While the exploration of name popularity and its connection to political allegiances may inspire a wry smile or perhaps an arched eyebrow, it remains an intriguing area of study. Smith (2010) highlights the potential impact of names on social interactions, delving into the idiosyncrasies of human perception and behavior in response to nomenclature. However, as we traipse further along this fanciful avenue of inquiry, we encounter the unexpected and the delightful, as the literature begins to take on a comically curious hue.

Doe (2015) contributes an analysis of the sociocultural significance of names in the context of political affiliations, shedding light on the multifaceted nature of nomenclature in shaping identity and social dynamics. Yet, as we set our sights on the enchanting state of Maryland, the lure of Lance beckons, drawing us into a whimsical romp through the statistical wilderness, where one might find correlations in the unlikeliest of places.

Jones (2018) leads us on a scholarly expedition into the intriguing world of name-based studies, exploring the shades of meaning and the subtle influences that names exert on human behavior. The enchanting allure of nomenclature is further underscored by the works of Brown (2017) and White (2019), as they delve into the nuances of name popularity and its potential ramifications on societal constructs. It is within this scholarly backdrop that we now unfurl the bountiful tapestry of our own whimsical inquiry.

Venturing beyond the solemn confines of scholarly spheres, we are drawn to the captivating realm of non-fiction literature, where titles such as "Nameology: A Lighthearted Guide to the Power of Names" by Dr. Lily Lovegood and "The Name Effect: How Names Influence Politics, Culture, and Business" by Professor A. N. Octave beckon with an irresistible blend of academic gravitas and playful whimsy. As we journey further into the realm of fiction, we encounter the whimsically titled "The Lance Legacy" by E. Picurious, where the protagonist's name exerts a fantastical influence over the fate of an otherworldly realm in a manner that is both charming and, at times, utterly preposterous.

In the realm of popular culture, the comical allure of internet memes such as "Lance the Vote" and "Republican Renaming: If Voters Were Named Lance" adds a lighthearted twist to our whimsical exploration, hinting at the possibility of a humorous interplay between digital jest and our own scholarly pursuits. As we navigate the charmingly convoluted landscape of nomenclature and voting propensities, we are reminded that amidst the weight of statistical analyses and scholarly endeavors, there exists a whimsical current of mirth and curiosity that enlivens the pursuit of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lance and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1976 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Loving Lance: Linking the Likelihood of Voting for the GOP in Maryland to the Popularity of the First Name "Lance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research endeavors to playfully probe the peculiar relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Lance" and the predilection for casting votes in favor of Republican presidential candidates in the state of Maryland. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, our study spanned the years 1976 to 2020. We astoundingly unearthed a positively robust correlation coefficient of 0.8340877, with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01. These results whimsically suggest that there may indeed exist a curious connection between the charismatic charm of the name "Lance" and the propensity to endorse the political pursuits of the Grand Old Party in the Free State of Maryland. Our findings add a lighthearted twist to the dynamics of name popularity and political preferences, and may inspire further whimsical inquiries into the intriguing interplay of nomenclature and voting inclinations.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The intersection of statistical analysis and wordplay often yields unexpected discoveries, and our latest foray into this enigmatic realm has unearthed a connection that is as amusing as it is bewildering. We present our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lance" and the proclivity to vote for Republican presidential candidates in the captivating state of Maryland. This endeavor is fueled by a delightfully peculiar curiosity and a dose of whimsy, as we embark on a journey to unravel the potential impact of nomenclature on political allegiance.
As we delve into this jovial jaunt through the data, we must acknowledge the seemingly whimsical nature of our inquiry. Names, after all, are but arbitrary sequences of letters chosen by parents or individuals, often devoid of any overt political connotations. However, as scholars of statistics, we are compelled to recognize that correlations can emerge from the most unexpected of places, and sometimes, a name might just have a statistical tale to tell.
With a twinkle in our eyes and a firm grip on our regression analyses, we set out to explore this charmingly unconventional connection. Drawing upon a comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration, in conjunction with the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and harmoniously complemented by the Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously scrutinized the records spanning from 1976 to 2020. Our dedication to this pursuit was unwavering, for we were determined to sift through the sea of data and tease out any gleams of connection between the name "Lance" and the political leanings of Maryland's voters.
As we unraveled the whimsically winding road of statistical analysis, it didn't take long for patterns to emerge. Our findings, much to our amusement, revealed a positively robust correlation coefficient of 0.8340877, with a p-value that elicited a knowing chuckle - less than 0.01. These numbers, in the realm of statistical banter, spoke volumes about the potential link between the resounding resonance of the name "Lance" and the harmonious embrace of Republican ideals in Maryland.
So here we are, poised to present the captivating results of our jovial exploration into the curious correlation between nomenclature and political preferences. It is our hope that our findings will inspire a giggle, perhaps even a wry grin, as they add a whimsical twist to the scholarly discourse on the interplay of names and voting inclinations. With that in mind, dear reader, let us embark on this playful journey through the parallel realms of name popularity and political proclivities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the arcane connection between the prevalence of the first name "Lance" and the voting inclination towards the Republican presidential candidate in Maryland, our research team meticulously applied a concoction of data collection methods, statistical analyses, and a generous sprinkling of statistical whimsy.

Data Collection:
Our investigation heeded to the siren call of data, scouring the vast shores of the US Social Security Administration's treasure trove of first name frequencies. We delved deep into their archives, procuring the enchanting frequencies of the name "Lance" from 1976 to 2020, gently swaying to the statistical symphony of nomenclature. To complement this melodious dataset, we harmoniously serenaded the MIT Election Data and Science Lab and the wondrous Harvard Dataverse, extracting the electoral data from the energetic state of Maryland, infusing a harmonious blend of voter preferences into our statistical potion.

Statistical Wizards and Magical Calculations:
With our cauldron bubbling with data, we set forth to weave an intricate tapestry of statistical enchantment. Employing the spellbinding powers of correlation analysis, we invoked Pearson's correlation coefficient to measure the strength and direction of the relationship between the popularity of the name "Lance" and the proportion of votes cast for Republican presidential candidates in Maryland. With a twirl of our statistical wand, we summoned the p-value from the depths of probability theory, seeking to discern the likelihood of observing such a spiffing relationship by sheer chance.

Control Variables and Spurious Sorcery:
To ward off the mischievous confounding variables that often lurk in the shadows of statistical analyses, we conjured a set of control variables to stand guard against spurious associations. Our incantations included the state's demographic characteristics, historical political affiliations, and a dash of economic indicators to ensure that our exploration of the Lance-Republican nexus remained unblemished by extraneous influences.

Ethical Considerations and Academic Incantations:
Our pursuit of this mirthful investigation was guided by the ethical precepts of scholarly wizardry, ensuring the responsible use of data and the dissemination of findings in a manner befitting the noble realms of academia. We adhered to the guidelines of data access and privacy, nurturing a spirit of transparency and integrity in our scholarly incantations.

In conclusion, our methodology intertwined the threads of data alchemy and statistical sorcery, navigating the winding paths of curiosity to unravel the enchanting connection between the name "Lance" and political inclinations in Maryland. With this methodology at our command, we gleefully conjured a whimsical exploration that promises to add a dash of statistical merriment to the scholarly landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lance and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1976 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8340877, r-squared of 0.6957023, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Loving Lance: Linking the Likelihood of Voting for the GOP in Maryland to the Popularity of the First Name "Lance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research endeavors to playfully probe the peculiar relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Lance" and the predilection for casting votes in favor of Republican presidential candidates in the state of Maryland. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, our study spanned the years 1976 to 2020. We astoundingly unearthed a positively robust correlation coefficient of 0.8340877, with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01. These results whimsically suggest that there may indeed exist a curious connection between the charismatic charm of the name "Lance" and the propensity to endorse the political pursuits of the Grand Old Party in the Free State of Maryland. Our findings add a lighthearted twist to the dynamics of name popularity and political preferences, and may inspire further whimsical inquiries into the intriguing interplay of nomenclature and voting inclinations.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
The intersection of statistical analysis and wordplay often yields unexpected discoveries, and our latest foray into this enigmatic realm has unearthed a connection that is as amusing as it is bewildering. We present our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lance" and the proclivity to vote for Republican presidential candidates in the captivating state of Maryland. This endeavor is fueled by a delightfully peculiar curiosity and a dose of whimsy, as we embark on a journey to unravel the potential impact of nomenclature on political allegiance.
As we delve into this jovial jaunt through the data, we must acknowledge the seemingly whimsical nature of our inquiry. Names, after all, are but arbitrary sequences of letters chosen by parents or individuals, often devoid of any overt political connotations. However, as scholars of statistics, we are compelled to recognize that correlations can emerge from the most unexpected of places, and sometimes, a name might just have a statistical tale to tell.
With a twinkle in our eyes and a firm grip on our regression analyses, we set out to explore this charmingly unconventional connection. Drawing upon a comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration, in conjunction with the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and harmoniously complemented by the Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously scrutinized the records spanning from 1976 to 2020. Our dedication to this pursuit was unwavering, for we were determined to sift through the sea of data and tease out any gleams of connection between the name "Lance" and the political leanings of Maryland's voters.
As we unraveled the whimsically winding road of statistical analysis, it didn't take long for patterns to emerge. Our findings, much to our amusement, revealed a positively robust correlation coefficient of 0.8340877, with a p-value that elicited a knowing chuckle - less than 0.01. These numbers, in the realm of statistical banter, spoke volumes about the potential link between the resounding resonance of the name "Lance" and the harmonious embrace of Republican ideals in Maryland.
So here we are, poised to present the captivating results of our jovial exploration into the curious correlation between nomenclature and political preferences. It is our hope that our findings will inspire a giggle, perhaps even a wry grin, as they add a whimsical twist to the scholarly discourse on the interplay of names and voting inclinations. With that in mind, dear reader, let us embark on this playful journey through the parallel realms of name popularity and political proclivities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our whimsical investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lance" and the propensity to vote for Republican presidential candidates in Maryland are as entertaining as they are intriguing. Upon subjecting the data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in addition to the Harvard Dataverse, to rigorous analysis, we discovered a positively robust correlation coefficient of 0.8340877. This finding elicited a collective chuckle from our research team, as it suggested a remarkably strong association between the name "Lance" and the inclination to endorse the Grand Old Party.

The r-squared value of 0.6957023 further accentuated our amusement, indicating that approximately 69.57% of the variation in votes for the Republican candidate in Maryland can be attributed to the ebullient allure of the name "Lance." Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 prompted knowing smiles among our researchers, as it reflected the statistical significance of this quirky connection.

As if to encapsulate the joviality of our findings, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) included in this paper vividly illustrates the strong correlation between the prevalence of the name "Lance" and the propensity to support Republican presidential candidates in Maryland. This striking visual depiction of our data is sure to provoke a gleeful chuckle from even the most stoic of observers.

In summation, our results suggest that there may indeed exist a delightfully inexplicable relationship between the name "Lance" and the affinity for casting votes in favor of Republican presidential candidates in Maryland. These findings add a sprightly twist to the otherwise solemn realm of political and statistical analysis, affirming that even in the hallowed halls of research, a bit of whimsy can go a long way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lance and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Loving Lance: Linking the Likelihood of Voting for the GOP in Maryland to the Popularity of the First Name "Lance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research endeavors to playfully probe the peculiar relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Lance" and the predilection for casting votes in favor of Republican presidential candidates in the state of Maryland. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, our study spanned the years 1976 to 2020. We astoundingly unearthed a positively robust correlation coefficient of 0.8340877, with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01. These results whimsically suggest that there may indeed exist a curious connection between the charismatic charm of the name "Lance" and the propensity to endorse the political pursuits of the Grand Old Party in the Free State of Maryland. Our findings add a lighthearted twist to the dynamics of name popularity and political preferences, and may inspire further whimsical inquiries into the intriguing interplay of nomenclature and voting inclinations.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The notion of appellative influence on various aspects of life has sparked a vigorous, albeit at times whimsical, discourse in both scholarly and informal circles alike. While the exploration of name popularity and its connection to political allegiances may inspire a wry smile or perhaps an arched eyebrow, it remains an intriguing area of study. Smith (2010) highlights the potential impact of names on social interactions, delving into the idiosyncrasies of human perception and behavior in response to nomenclature. However, as we traipse further along this fanciful avenue of inquiry, we encounter the unexpected and the delightful, as the literature begins to take on a comically curious hue.
Doe (2015) contributes an analysis of the sociocultural significance of names in the context of political affiliations, shedding light on the multifaceted nature of nomenclature in shaping identity and social dynamics. Yet, as we set our sights on the enchanting state of Maryland, the lure of Lance beckons, drawing us into a whimsical romp through the statistical wilderness, where one might find correlations in the unlikeliest of places.
Jones (2018) leads us on a scholarly expedition into the intriguing world of name-based studies, exploring the shades of meaning and the subtle influences that names exert on human behavior. The enchanting allure of nomenclature is further underscored by the works of Brown (2017) and White (2019), as they delve into the nuances of name popularity and its potential ramifications on societal constructs. It is within this scholarly backdrop that we now unfurl the bountiful tapestry of our own whimsical inquiry.
Venturing beyond the solemn confines of scholarly spheres, we are drawn to the captivating realm of non-fiction literature, where titles such as "Nameology: A Lighthearted Guide to the Power of Names" by Dr. Lily Lovegood and "The Name Effect: How Names Influence Politics, Culture, and Business" by Professor A. N. Octave beckon with an irresistible blend of academic gravitas and playful whimsy. As we journey further into the realm of fiction, we encounter the whimsically titled "The Lance Legacy" by E. Picurious, where the protagonist's name exerts a fantastical influence over the fate of an otherworldly realm in a manner that is both charming and, at times, utterly preposterous.
In the realm of popular culture, the comical allure of internet memes such as "Lance the Vote" and "Republican Renaming: If Voters Were Named Lance" adds a lighthearted twist to our whimsical exploration, hinting at the possibility of a humorous interplay between digital jest and our own scholarly pursuits. As we navigate the charmingly convoluted landscape of nomenclature and voting propensities, we are reminded that amidst the weight of statistical analyses and scholarly endeavors, there exists a whimsical current of mirth and curiosity that enlivens the pursuit of knowledge.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our whimsical investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lance" and the propensity to vote for Republican presidential candidates in Maryland are as entertaining as they are intriguing. Upon subjecting the data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in addition to the Harvard Dataverse, to rigorous analysis, we discovered a positively robust correlation coefficient of 0.8340877. This finding elicited a collective chuckle from our research team, as it suggested a remarkably strong association between the name "Lance" and the inclination to endorse the Grand Old Party.
The r-squared value of 0.6957023 further accentuated our amusement, indicating that approximately 69.57% of the variation in votes for the Republican candidate in Maryland can be attributed to the ebullient allure of the name "Lance." Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 prompted knowing smiles among our researchers, as it reflected the statistical significance of this quirky connection.
As if to encapsulate the joviality of our findings, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) included in this paper vividly illustrates the strong correlation between the prevalence of the name "Lance" and the propensity to support Republican presidential candidates in Maryland. This striking visual depiction of our data is sure to provoke a gleeful chuckle from even the most stoic of observers.
In summation, our results suggest that there may indeed exist a delightfully inexplicable relationship between the name "Lance" and the affinity for casting votes in favor of Republican presidential candidates in Maryland. These findings add a sprightly twist to the otherwise solemn realm of political and statistical analysis, affirming that even in the hallowed halls of research, a bit of whimsy can go a long way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The convivial correlation uncovered in our study between the preponderance of the name "Lance" and the penchant for voting in favor of the Republican presidential candidate in Maryland opens up a veritable treasure trove of both scholarly and whimsical musings. Our findings are in line with the earlier scholarly romps through the statistical wilderness, embracing the comically curious hue that has enchanted researchers of names and voting propensities.

As whimsical as it may seem, our results whimsically add weight to Smith’s (2010) proposition regarding the idiosyncrasies of human perception and behavior in response to nomenclature. The strong correlation coefficient we unearthed pays homage to the multifaceted nature of nomenclature in shaping identity and social dynamics. Similarly, Doe’s (2015) analysis of the sociocultural significance of names in the context of political affiliations is upheld by our work, playfully illustrating the enchanting realm of name-based studies and their unexpected statistical weight.

Our study, in one fell swoop, expands the tapestry of name-based inquiries, evoking Jones’s (2018) scholarly expedition into the intriguing world of names and their influences on human behavior. Brown (2017) and White (2019) can rest easy, knowing that our lighthearted foray into the statistical wilderness aligns with their work as we delve into the nuanced influence of name popularity on societal constructs.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) included in this paper, serving as a delightful visual, ingeniously captures the robust correlation between the popularity of the name "Lance" and the proclivity to support Republican presidential candidates in Maryland. This charming depiction is a testament to the unexpected whimsicality that often underpins the most surprising statistical relationships.

In the whimsical pursuit of knowledge, it is often the unexpected, the lighthearted, and the utterly preposterous that give rise to new and delightful understandings of the world. Our findings, though whimsical in appearance, beg us to consider the potential ramifications of nomenclature on voting inclinations and, by extension, social and political dynamics. As we revel in the merry tangle of our research, we find that even in the realm of statistics and scholarly pursuits, a bit of whimsy can, indeed, go a long way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lance and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Loving Lance: Linking the Likelihood of Voting for the GOP in Maryland to the Popularity of the First Name "Lance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research endeavors to playfully probe the peculiar relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Lance" and the predilection for casting votes in favor of Republican presidential candidates in the state of Maryland. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, our study spanned the years 1976 to 2020. We astoundingly unearthed a positively robust correlation coefficient of 0.8340877, with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01. These results whimsically suggest that there may indeed exist a curious connection between the charismatic charm of the name "Lance" and the propensity to endorse the political pursuits of the Grand Old Party in the Free State of Maryland. Our findings add a lighthearted twist to the dynamics of name popularity and political preferences, and may inspire further whimsical inquiries into the intriguing interplay of nomenclature and voting inclinations.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
The intersection of statistical analysis and wordplay often yields unexpected discoveries, and our latest foray into this enigmatic realm has unearthed a connection that is as amusing as it is bewildering. We present our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lance" and the proclivity to vote for Republican presidential candidates in the captivating state of Maryland. This endeavor is fueled by a delightfully peculiar curiosity and a dose of whimsy, as we embark on a journey to unravel the potential impact of nomenclature on political allegiance.
As we delve into this jovial jaunt through the data, we must acknowledge the seemingly whimsical nature of our inquiry. Names, after all, are but arbitrary sequences of letters chosen by parents or individuals, often devoid of any overt political connotations. However, as scholars of statistics, we are compelled to recognize that correlations can emerge from the most unexpected of places, and sometimes, a name might just have a statistical tale to tell.
With a twinkle in our eyes and a firm grip on our regression analyses, we set out to explore this charmingly unconventional connection. Drawing upon a comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration, in conjunction with the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and harmoniously complemented by the Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously scrutinized the records spanning from 1976 to 2020. Our dedication to this pursuit was unwavering, for we were determined to sift through the sea of data and tease out any gleams of connection between the name "Lance" and the political leanings of Maryland's voters.
As we unraveled the whimsically winding road of statistical analysis, it didn't take long for patterns to emerge. Our findings, much to our amusement, revealed a positively robust correlation coefficient of 0.8340877, with a p-value that elicited a knowing chuckle - less than 0.01. These numbers, in the realm of statistical banter, spoke volumes about the potential link between the resounding resonance of the name "Lance" and the harmonious embrace of Republican ideals in Maryland.
So here we are, poised to present the captivating results of our jovial exploration into the curious correlation between nomenclature and political preferences. It is our hope that our findings will inspire a giggle, perhaps even a wry grin, as they add a whimsical twist to the scholarly discourse on the interplay of names and voting inclinations. With that in mind, dear reader, let us embark on this playful journey through the parallel realms of name popularity and political proclivities.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our whimsical investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lance" and the propensity to vote for Republican presidential candidates in Maryland are as entertaining as they are intriguing. Upon subjecting the data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in addition to the Harvard Dataverse, to rigorous analysis, we discovered a positively robust correlation coefficient of 0.8340877. This finding elicited a collective chuckle from our research team, as it suggested a remarkably strong association between the name "Lance" and the inclination to endorse the Grand Old Party.
The r-squared value of 0.6957023 further accentuated our amusement, indicating that approximately 69.57% of the variation in votes for the Republican candidate in Maryland can be attributed to the ebullient allure of the name "Lance." Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 prompted knowing smiles among our researchers, as it reflected the statistical significance of this quirky connection.
As if to encapsulate the joviality of our findings, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) included in this paper vividly illustrates the strong correlation between the prevalence of the name "Lance" and the propensity to support Republican presidential candidates in Maryland. This striking visual depiction of our data is sure to provoke a gleeful chuckle from even the most stoic of observers.
In summation, our results suggest that there may indeed exist a delightfully inexplicable relationship between the name "Lance" and the affinity for casting votes in favor of Republican presidential candidates in Maryland. These findings add a sprightly twist to the otherwise solemn realm of political and statistical analysis, affirming that even in the hallowed halls of research, a bit of whimsy can go a long way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In concluding this jocular journey through the unpredictable interplay of nomenclature and political preferences, we are delighted to present the rollicking results of our study. The positively robust correlation coefficient of 0.8340877, coupled with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01, merrily suggests a connection between the name "Lance" and the proclivity to endorse the GOP in Maryland. Our r-squared value of 0.6957023 humorously underscores that approximately 69.57% of the variation in votes for the Republican candidate in Maryland can be attributed to the ebullient allure of the name "Lance." It seems that the name "Lance" may hold a charm that is as irresistible to voters as a siren's call.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates our giddy revelation, illustrating the uncannily strong correlation between the prevalence of the name "Lance" and the penchant for supporting Republican presidential candidates in Maryland. We cannot help but grin at the thought that this whimsical correlation may indeed point to an unexpected influence of nomenclature on political preferences.

As we jovially wrap up this endeavor, it is with a touch of whimsy and a pinch of statistical astonishment that we assert: no more research is needed in this endearingly ludicrous realm of investigation. We leave it to future jesters of science to ponder the enigma of Lance and the GOP in Maryland, for our results stand, lighthearted and resolute, in the annals of scholarly amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Loving Lance: Linking the Likelihood of Voting for the GOP in Maryland to the Popularity of the First Name Lance. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Social Science Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Loving Lance: Linking the Likelihood of Voting for the GOP in Maryland to the Popularity of the First Name Lance. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for the Advancement of Name-Related Socio-Political Studies (SANRSPS)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Loving Lance: Linking the Likelihood of Voting for the GOP in Maryland to the Popularity of the First Name Lance with an abstract of This research endeavors to playfully probe the peculiar relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Lance" and the predilection for casting votes in favor of Republican presidential candidates in the state of Maryland. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, our study spanned the years 1976 to 2020. We astoundingly unearthed a positively robust correlation coefficient of 0.8340877, with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01. These results whimsically suggest that there may indeed exist a curious connection between the charismatic charm of the name "Lance" and the propensity to endorse the political pursuits of the Grand Old Party in the Free State of Maryland. Our findings add a lighthearted twist to the dynamics of name popularity and political preferences, and may inspire further whimsical inquiries into the intriguing interplay of nomenclature and voting inclinations.

ChatGPT:

"Loving Lance", Maryland, GOP, Republican, Lance name popularity, voting preferences, US Social Security Administration data, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, correlation between name popularity and political preference, Maryland voting patterns, Lance and Republican presidential candidates

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Lance
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Lance
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Lance

Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland

Correlation r = 0.8340877 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6957023 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 69.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Lance) over the 12 years from 1976 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00074. 0.0007440704112775007000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.074% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,344 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.5, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
197619801984198819921996200020042008201220162020
Popularity of the first name Lance (Babies born)17451802215119021507104812211166751539436315
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland (Percentage of votes)46.964644.18152.505151.107635.629438.269540.184842.978236.474535.897716.959332.1503




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1745,1802,2151,1902,1507,1048,1221,1166,751,539,436,315,])
array_2 = np.array([46.9646,44.181,52.5051,51.1076,35.6294,38.2695,40.1848,42.9782,36.4745,35.8977,16.9593,32.1503,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Lance"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 5590 · Black Variable ID: 2521 · Red Variable ID: 26111
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0