about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,542 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Vanessa and the second variable is Air pollution in Huntington, West Virginia.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Fewer Vanessas meant fewer personalized air fresheners being used, leading to a slight improvement in local air quality.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling city street in Huntington, West Virginia, where various personalized air fresheners are on display in a shop window. There are noticeably fewer air fresheners with the name 'Vanessa' on them, causing a slight uplift in the air quality. The scene should capture the feeling of a quieter, fresher atmosphere in the city due to this change. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Vanessa and Air pollution in Huntington, West Virginia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy art illustration Scalar art Cute 2D animation A Discovery magazine cover image An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Vanessa and Air pollution in Huntington, West Virginia, in the following situation: Fewer Vanessas meant fewer personalized air fresheners being used, leading to a slight improvement in local air quality.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Huntington, West Virginia, there are fewer personalized air fresheners with the name Vanessa on them being used. The air quality in the city seems slightly improved as a result.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In Huntington, West Virginia, there are fewer personalized air fresheners with the name Vanessa on them being used. The air quality in the city seems slightly improved as a result. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a bustling city street in Huntington, West Virginia, where various personalized air fresheners are on display in a shop window. There are noticeably fewer air fresheners with the name 'Vanessa' on them, causing a slight uplift in the air quality. The scene should capture the feeling of a quieter, fresher atmosphere in the city due to this change.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Vanessa caused Air pollution in Huntington, West Virginia to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Name Pollution: The Vanessance of Air Quality in Huntington, WV

The Journal of Environmental Hilarity

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Vanessa and Air pollution in Huntington, West Virginia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8345914 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Name Pollution: The Vanessance of Air Quality in Huntington, WV

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study examines the correlation between the popularity of the first name Vanessa and air pollution levels in Huntington, West Virginia. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency for the years 1980 to 2022, this research explores the link between a common name and the atmospheric conditions in a specific geographic area. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8345914 and a significance level of p < 0.01, the findings suggest a statistically significant association between the two variables. Our results fuel the ongoing debate on the influence of personal nomenclature on local environmental factors and add a breath of fresh air to the field of name-based atmospheric research.

Dad Joke: Did you hear about the name Vanessa that polluted the air? It was quite an "air-iating" experience!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Vanessa and Air pollution in Huntington, West Virginia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Name Pollution: The Vanessance of Air Quality in Huntington, WV

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study examines the correlation between the popularity of the first name Vanessa and air pollution levels in Huntington, West Virginia. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency for the years 1980 to 2022, this research explores the link between a common name and the atmospheric conditions in a specific geographic area. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8345914 and a significance level of p < 0.01, the findings suggest a statistically significant association between the two variables. Our results fuel the ongoing debate on the influence of personal nomenclature on local environmental factors and add a breath of fresh air to the field of name-based atmospheric research.

Dad Joke: Did you hear about the name Vanessa that polluted the air? It was quite an "air-iating" experience!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Gentle readers and esteemed members of the scientific community, welcome to a whimsical yet informative journey through the intriguing world of "Name Pollution." As we embark on this comical, yet intellectually stimulating endeavor, we shall unravel the remarkable relationship between the popularity of the first name Vanessa and the atmospheric quality in none other than the charming city of Huntington, West Virginia.

Dad Joke: What's the air's favorite type of name? The "atmos-pheric" kind, of course!

In recent years, research in the field of environmental science has broadened its horizons to include an unexpected variable – the names we bestow upon our fellow earth-dwellers. This study, shining a spotlight on the not-so-innocuous name Vanessa, aims to shed light on the impact of nomenclature on environmental conditions, all while maintaining a good sense of humor through the process.

Dad Joke: Why did the statistician break up with the scientist? He suspected she was "mean" about "median" research methods!

Now, you might wonder what drove us to scrutinize the name Vanessa specifically. As it turns out, this moniker has exhibited a peculiar pattern of popularity in Huntington, West Virginia, piquing our curiosity and sparking the flame of scientific inquiry. The natural question arose - could there be a correlation between the rise and fall of the name Vanessa and the ebb and flow of air pollution levels in this region? We embarked on our nerdy odyssey to find out.

Dad Joke: Did you hear about the statistician who wanted to be popular? He started gathering "mean" friends and formed a "significant" social circle!

Now, we cannot help but acknowledge the apparent absurdity of our hypothesis - after all, how could something as apparently inconsequential as a name relate to the serious issue of air quality? Yet, as the renowned scientist Marie Curie once said, "Nothing in life is to be feared; it is only to be understood." And so, armed with this wisdom and an unabashed love for a good pun, we delved into our analysis with gusto.

Dad Joke: Why do scientists enjoy nomenclature puns? Because they find them element-ary and eminently amus-ing, of course!

So, grab your lab coats and fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for a laughter-filled yet intellectually stimulating journey into the quirky world of name-based atmospheric research awaits. Let us explore the Vanessance of Air Quality in Huntington, WV and sift through the data with a keen eye, a quick wit, and, most importantly, a sense of scientific curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Vanessa and Air pollution in Huntington, West Virginia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Name Pollution: The Vanessance of Air Quality in Huntington, WV

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study examines the correlation between the popularity of the first name Vanessa and air pollution levels in Huntington, West Virginia. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency for the years 1980 to 2022, this research explores the link between a common name and the atmospheric conditions in a specific geographic area. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8345914 and a significance level of p < 0.01, the findings suggest a statistically significant association between the two variables. Our results fuel the ongoing debate on the influence of personal nomenclature on local environmental factors and add a breath of fresh air to the field of name-based atmospheric research.

Dad Joke: Did you hear about the name Vanessa that polluted the air? It was quite an "air-iating" experience!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Gentle readers and esteemed members of the scientific community, welcome to a whimsical yet informative journey through the intriguing world of "Name Pollution." As we embark on this comical, yet intellectually stimulating endeavor, we shall unravel the remarkable relationship between the popularity of the first name Vanessa and the atmospheric quality in none other than the charming city of Huntington, West Virginia.
Dad Joke: What's the air's favorite type of name? The "atmos-pheric" kind, of course!
In recent years, research in the field of environmental science has broadened its horizons to include an unexpected variable – the names we bestow upon our fellow earth-dwellers. This study, shining a spotlight on the not-so-innocuous name Vanessa, aims to shed light on the impact of nomenclature on environmental conditions, all while maintaining a good sense of humor through the process.
Dad Joke: Why did the statistician break up with the scientist? He suspected she was "mean" about "median" research methods!
Now, you might wonder what drove us to scrutinize the name Vanessa specifically. As it turns out, this moniker has exhibited a peculiar pattern of popularity in Huntington, West Virginia, piquing our curiosity and sparking the flame of scientific inquiry. The natural question arose - could there be a correlation between the rise and fall of the name Vanessa and the ebb and flow of air pollution levels in this region? We embarked on our nerdy odyssey to find out.
Dad Joke: Did you hear about the statistician who wanted to be popular? He started gathering "mean" friends and formed a "significant" social circle!
Now, we cannot help but acknowledge the apparent absurdity of our hypothesis - after all, how could something as apparently inconsequential as a name relate to the serious issue of air quality? Yet, as the renowned scientist Marie Curie once said, "Nothing in life is to be feared; it is only to be understood." And so, armed with this wisdom and an unabashed love for a good pun, we delved into our analysis with gusto.
Dad Joke: Why do scientists enjoy nomenclature puns? Because they find them element-ary and eminently amus-ing, of course!
So, grab your lab coats and fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for a laughter-filled yet intellectually stimulating journey into the quirky world of name-based atmospheric research awaits. Let us explore the Vanessance of Air Quality in Huntington, WV and sift through the data with a keen eye, a quick wit, and, most importantly, a sense of scientific curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature reviewed for this study encompasses a range of sources contributing to the understanding of both naming trends and air quality. Smith and Doe (2015) present an analysis of naming patterns across various regions in the United States, revealing intriguing correlations between naming conventions and local demographics. Their findings hint at the cultural significance of names and the potential impact on societal elements. Similarly, Jones (2018) delves into the historical evolution of names, highlighting the societal influences that contribute to the rise and fall of specific monikers.

In "Air Pollution and Its Effects" by Brown (2019), the author explores the detrimental impact of air pollution on human health and the environment. The study emphasizes the importance of monitoring and addressing air quality to mitigate the adverse effects on public well-being. Furthermore, "The Name Game: Decoding the Psychology of Naming" by White (2020) delves into the psychological aspects of naming, offering insights into the symbolic and emotional weight attached to names.

Turning to fictional works that may suggest connections to our research, "The Airborne Adventures of Vanessa Vortex" by Blue (2017) introduces an adventurous protagonist whose name carries air-related connotations. Although a work of fiction, it adds a whimsical layer to our exploration of the relationship between the name Vanessa and atmospheric conditions. Likewise, "Pollution Ponderings: The Tale of Huntington's Hazy Horizon" by Green (2018) weaves an environmental narrative that merges the concept of pollution with the geographical setting under scrutiny in our study.

Expanding our review to more unorthodox sources, while not typically associated with scholarly inquiry, a thorough examination of the back of shampoo bottles surprisingly yielded subtle insights into air pollution, with some products boasting environmentally friendly features. While not scientifically sound, these brief revelations serve as a lighthearted reminder of the ubiquity of air quality concerns, even in the most unexpected places.

Dad Joke: Did you hear about the shampoo that wrote a thesis on air pollution? It had a lot of "conditioned" data!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Vanessa and Air pollution in Huntington, West Virginia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 1980 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Name Pollution: The Vanessance of Air Quality in Huntington, WV

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study examines the correlation between the popularity of the first name Vanessa and air pollution levels in Huntington, West Virginia. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency for the years 1980 to 2022, this research explores the link between a common name and the atmospheric conditions in a specific geographic area. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8345914 and a significance level of p < 0.01, the findings suggest a statistically significant association between the two variables. Our results fuel the ongoing debate on the influence of personal nomenclature on local environmental factors and add a breath of fresh air to the field of name-based atmospheric research.

Dad Joke: Did you hear about the name Vanessa that polluted the air? It was quite an "air-iating" experience!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Gentle readers and esteemed members of the scientific community, welcome to a whimsical yet informative journey through the intriguing world of "Name Pollution." As we embark on this comical, yet intellectually stimulating endeavor, we shall unravel the remarkable relationship between the popularity of the first name Vanessa and the atmospheric quality in none other than the charming city of Huntington, West Virginia.
Dad Joke: What's the air's favorite type of name? The "atmos-pheric" kind, of course!
In recent years, research in the field of environmental science has broadened its horizons to include an unexpected variable – the names we bestow upon our fellow earth-dwellers. This study, shining a spotlight on the not-so-innocuous name Vanessa, aims to shed light on the impact of nomenclature on environmental conditions, all while maintaining a good sense of humor through the process.
Dad Joke: Why did the statistician break up with the scientist? He suspected she was "mean" about "median" research methods!
Now, you might wonder what drove us to scrutinize the name Vanessa specifically. As it turns out, this moniker has exhibited a peculiar pattern of popularity in Huntington, West Virginia, piquing our curiosity and sparking the flame of scientific inquiry. The natural question arose - could there be a correlation between the rise and fall of the name Vanessa and the ebb and flow of air pollution levels in this region? We embarked on our nerdy odyssey to find out.
Dad Joke: Did you hear about the statistician who wanted to be popular? He started gathering "mean" friends and formed a "significant" social circle!
Now, we cannot help but acknowledge the apparent absurdity of our hypothesis - after all, how could something as apparently inconsequential as a name relate to the serious issue of air quality? Yet, as the renowned scientist Marie Curie once said, "Nothing in life is to be feared; it is only to be understood." And so, armed with this wisdom and an unabashed love for a good pun, we delved into our analysis with gusto.
Dad Joke: Why do scientists enjoy nomenclature puns? Because they find them element-ary and eminently amus-ing, of course!
So, grab your lab coats and fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for a laughter-filled yet intellectually stimulating journey into the quirky world of name-based atmospheric research awaits. Let us explore the Vanessance of Air Quality in Huntington, WV and sift through the data with a keen eye, a quick wit, and, most importantly, a sense of scientific curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Sample Selection:
To conduct this research, we compiled a comprehensive dataset of first name occurrences from the US Social Security Administration and air quality measurements from the Environmental Protection Agency. We focused our efforts on Huntington, West Virginia, as our study area, where we observed variations in the popularity of the name Vanessa and air pollution levels from the year 1980 to 2022. We derived immense satisfaction in selecting this particular dataset for its diversity and breadth, much like a box of assorted chocolates, each holding a surprise within.

Dad Joke: Why did the researcher bring a ladder to the library? Because he wanted to climb up the "bookshelf" of knowledge!

Data Analysis:
Our approach involved the utilization of sophisticated statistical methods to analyze the relationship between the frequency of the name Vanessa and air pollution concentrations. We employed correlation analyses and linear regression models to discern patterns and trends, akin to detectives in a mystery novel, uncovering the enigmatic connections between these seemingly disparate variables.

Dad Joke: What do you call a statistician who can drive a car? A "mean" motorist who always hits the "mode" on the road!

Control Variables:
In order to circumvent the influence of extraneous factors, we diligently controlled for variables such as population density, industrial activities, and meteorological conditions. These control measures served as the loyal sidekicks in our research adventure, safeguarding the integrity of our analyses and allowing us to distinguish the true impact of the name Vanessa on air quality.

Dad Joke: Why did the researcher bring a pencil to the lab? To draw "significance" levels on the graph paper, of course!

Ethical Considerations:
In adherence to ethical standards, our team upheld the privacy and confidentiality of individuals represented in the name dataset. We ensured that our analysis strictly focused on aggregate trends and did not compromise the anonymity of any specific individuals. To navigate this ethical maze, we followed the golden rule of research ethics - treat others' data as you would want your own data to be treated.

Dad Joke: Why did the researcher bring a map to the laboratory? Because he wanted to "navigate" the complex terrain of statistical analyses!

Data Limitations:
While our dataset spanned over four decades, it is essential to acknowledge the inherent limitations of the data sources. Fluctuations in name popularity and variations in air pollution monitoring practices could introduce noise into our analyses. Nonetheless, we approached these limitations with a lighthearted spirit, acknowledging that every scientific journey presents its own set of challenges and surprises, much like a thrilling rollercoaster ride through the land of data analysis.

Dad Joke: Why don’t statisticians believe in traditional music? They prefer "discrete" tunes over continuous melodies!

By immersing ourselves in these meticulous research methods and infusing our analyses with a touch of humor, we sought to unravel the mysterious connection between the name Vanessa and air quality in Huntington, WV. This methodology, crafted with precision and a sprinkle of levity, laid the foundation for our investigation into the peculiar phenomenon known as "Name Pollution."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Vanessa and Air pollution in Huntington, West Virginia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 1980 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8345914, r-squared of 0.6965428, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Name Pollution: The Vanessance of Air Quality in Huntington, WV

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study examines the correlation between the popularity of the first name Vanessa and air pollution levels in Huntington, West Virginia. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency for the years 1980 to 2022, this research explores the link between a common name and the atmospheric conditions in a specific geographic area. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8345914 and a significance level of p < 0.01, the findings suggest a statistically significant association between the two variables. Our results fuel the ongoing debate on the influence of personal nomenclature on local environmental factors and add a breath of fresh air to the field of name-based atmospheric research.

Dad Joke: Did you hear about the name Vanessa that polluted the air? It was quite an "air-iating" experience!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Gentle readers and esteemed members of the scientific community, welcome to a whimsical yet informative journey through the intriguing world of "Name Pollution." As we embark on this comical, yet intellectually stimulating endeavor, we shall unravel the remarkable relationship between the popularity of the first name Vanessa and the atmospheric quality in none other than the charming city of Huntington, West Virginia.
Dad Joke: What's the air's favorite type of name? The "atmos-pheric" kind, of course!
In recent years, research in the field of environmental science has broadened its horizons to include an unexpected variable – the names we bestow upon our fellow earth-dwellers. This study, shining a spotlight on the not-so-innocuous name Vanessa, aims to shed light on the impact of nomenclature on environmental conditions, all while maintaining a good sense of humor through the process.
Dad Joke: Why did the statistician break up with the scientist? He suspected she was "mean" about "median" research methods!
Now, you might wonder what drove us to scrutinize the name Vanessa specifically. As it turns out, this moniker has exhibited a peculiar pattern of popularity in Huntington, West Virginia, piquing our curiosity and sparking the flame of scientific inquiry. The natural question arose - could there be a correlation between the rise and fall of the name Vanessa and the ebb and flow of air pollution levels in this region? We embarked on our nerdy odyssey to find out.
Dad Joke: Did you hear about the statistician who wanted to be popular? He started gathering "mean" friends and formed a "significant" social circle!
Now, we cannot help but acknowledge the apparent absurdity of our hypothesis - after all, how could something as apparently inconsequential as a name relate to the serious issue of air quality? Yet, as the renowned scientist Marie Curie once said, "Nothing in life is to be feared; it is only to be understood." And so, armed with this wisdom and an unabashed love for a good pun, we delved into our analysis with gusto.
Dad Joke: Why do scientists enjoy nomenclature puns? Because they find them element-ary and eminently amus-ing, of course!
So, grab your lab coats and fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for a laughter-filled yet intellectually stimulating journey into the quirky world of name-based atmospheric research awaits. Let us explore the Vanessance of Air Quality in Huntington, WV and sift through the data with a keen eye, a quick wit, and, most importantly, a sense of scientific curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation of 0.8345914 between the popularity of the first name Vanessa and air pollution levels in Huntington, West Virginia from 1980 to 2022. The coefficient of determination, or R-squared value, further affirmed the robustness of this relationship, coming in at a hearty 0.6965428. The p-value, clocking in at less than 0.01, elicited a collective "wow" from the research team, indicating that this correlation is not just a fluke but rather a meaningful association worthy of further investigation.

Dad Joke: Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears!

Moving beyond the realm of numbers and into the realm of visuals, the findings are elegantly encapsulated in Figure 1. The scatterplot demonstrates a strikingly linear pattern, as if the name Vanessa and air pollution were engaged in a lively tango across the decades. One can almost hear the faint echoes of "Vanessa" in the wind amidst the backdrop of fluctuating pollution levels - truly a symphony of sound and smog.

Dad Joke: Did you hear about the air pollution data that got into a relationship with the name popularity data? It's like they were "pollu-mates" destined to be together!

In conclusion, the results of this investigation not only unravel a previously underappreciated link between nomenclature and environmental quality but also inject a hearty dose of levity into the typically austere realm of scientific inquiry. The "Vanessance" of Air Quality in Huntington, WV stands as a testament to the symbiotic dance between human culture and natural phenomena, highlighting the unforeseen ways in which our actions - and even our names - resonate with the world around us.

Dad Joke: How do scientists freshen their breath? With experi-mints and statisti-cool analysis!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Vanessa and Air pollution in Huntington, West Virginia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Name Pollution: The Vanessance of Air Quality in Huntington, WV

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study examines the correlation between the popularity of the first name Vanessa and air pollution levels in Huntington, West Virginia. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency for the years 1980 to 2022, this research explores the link between a common name and the atmospheric conditions in a specific geographic area. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8345914 and a significance level of p < 0.01, the findings suggest a statistically significant association between the two variables. Our results fuel the ongoing debate on the influence of personal nomenclature on local environmental factors and add a breath of fresh air to the field of name-based atmospheric research.

Dad Joke: Did you hear about the name Vanessa that polluted the air? It was quite an "air-iating" experience!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature reviewed for this study encompasses a range of sources contributing to the understanding of both naming trends and air quality. Smith and Doe (2015) present an analysis of naming patterns across various regions in the United States, revealing intriguing correlations between naming conventions and local demographics. Their findings hint at the cultural significance of names and the potential impact on societal elements. Similarly, Jones (2018) delves into the historical evolution of names, highlighting the societal influences that contribute to the rise and fall of specific monikers.
In "Air Pollution and Its Effects" by Brown (2019), the author explores the detrimental impact of air pollution on human health and the environment. The study emphasizes the importance of monitoring and addressing air quality to mitigate the adverse effects on public well-being. Furthermore, "The Name Game: Decoding the Psychology of Naming" by White (2020) delves into the psychological aspects of naming, offering insights into the symbolic and emotional weight attached to names.
Turning to fictional works that may suggest connections to our research, "The Airborne Adventures of Vanessa Vortex" by Blue (2017) introduces an adventurous protagonist whose name carries air-related connotations. Although a work of fiction, it adds a whimsical layer to our exploration of the relationship between the name Vanessa and atmospheric conditions. Likewise, "Pollution Ponderings: The Tale of Huntington's Hazy Horizon" by Green (2018) weaves an environmental narrative that merges the concept of pollution with the geographical setting under scrutiny in our study.
Expanding our review to more unorthodox sources, while not typically associated with scholarly inquiry, a thorough examination of the back of shampoo bottles surprisingly yielded subtle insights into air pollution, with some products boasting environmentally friendly features. While not scientifically sound, these brief revelations serve as a lighthearted reminder of the ubiquity of air quality concerns, even in the most unexpected places.
Dad Joke: Did you hear about the shampoo that wrote a thesis on air pollution? It had a lot of "conditioned" data!

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation of 0.8345914 between the popularity of the first name Vanessa and air pollution levels in Huntington, West Virginia from 1980 to 2022. The coefficient of determination, or R-squared value, further affirmed the robustness of this relationship, coming in at a hearty 0.6965428. The p-value, clocking in at less than 0.01, elicited a collective "wow" from the research team, indicating that this correlation is not just a fluke but rather a meaningful association worthy of further investigation.
Dad Joke: Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears!
Moving beyond the realm of numbers and into the realm of visuals, the findings are elegantly encapsulated in Figure 1. The scatterplot demonstrates a strikingly linear pattern, as if the name Vanessa and air pollution were engaged in a lively tango across the decades. One can almost hear the faint echoes of "Vanessa" in the wind amidst the backdrop of fluctuating pollution levels - truly a symphony of sound and smog.
Dad Joke: Did you hear about the air pollution data that got into a relationship with the name popularity data? It's like they were "pollu-mates" destined to be together!
In conclusion, the results of this investigation not only unravel a previously underappreciated link between nomenclature and environmental quality but also inject a hearty dose of levity into the typically austere realm of scientific inquiry. The "Vanessance" of Air Quality in Huntington, WV stands as a testament to the symbiotic dance between human culture and natural phenomena, highlighting the unforeseen ways in which our actions - and even our names - resonate with the world around us.
Dad Joke: How do scientists freshen their breath? With experi-mints and statisti-cool analysis!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study shed light on the intriguing association between the popularity of the first name Vanessa and air pollution levels in Huntington, West Virginia. Our results not only confirm the prior research by Smith and Doe (2015) on naming patterns and societal influences but also extend the conversation to include potential environmental ramifications. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8345914 and a p-value less than 0.01 lend robust support to our hypothesis, suggesting a compelling relationship between the two variables.

Dad Joke: Did you hear about the statistician who couldn't stop making correlations? He just couldn't find the right p-value in his personal life!

The literature review, featuring the unconventional references to fictional works and shampoo bottles, provided insights that may appear lighthearted at first glance but offered intriguing connections to our investigation. Building upon the whimsy of "The Airborne Adventures of Vanessa Vortex" by Blue (2017) and the environmental narrative in "Pollution Ponderings: The Tale of Huntington's Hazy Horizon" by Green (2018), our study epitomizes the potential for surprising discoveries in unexpected places. It's a reminder that sometimes the most unlikely sources may offer hidden insights into our research inquiries.

Dad Joke: Why should you never trust atoms? They make up everything, including bad science jokes!

The visually appealing scatterplot in Figure 1 encapsulates the data's compelling narrative, offering a vibrant depiction of the relationship between the name Vanessa and air pollution levels. The linear pattern evokes a sense of synergy between the variables, as if the name "Vanessa" and air pollution are engaged in a harmonious dance through time. Such vivid imagery adds a touch of poetic flair to our quantitative findings, illustrating the captivating interplay between human cultural phenomena and environmental factors.

Dad Joke: How do you organize a science party? You "test" the waters and "beaker"ful with the invitations!

In summary, our study not only contributes to the burgeoning field of name-based atmospheric research but also underscores the potential for serendipitous discoveries in academia. The "Vanessance" of Air Quality in Huntington, WV serves as a whimsical yet thought-provoking exploration of the multifaceted interconnections between personal nomenclature and environmental conditions, injecting a breath of fresh air into traditional scientific discourse.

Dad Joke: What did the scientist say when he found two isotopes of helium? HeHe


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Vanessa and Air pollution in Huntington, West Virginia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Name Pollution: The Vanessance of Air Quality in Huntington, WV

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study examines the correlation between the popularity of the first name Vanessa and air pollution levels in Huntington, West Virginia. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency for the years 1980 to 2022, this research explores the link between a common name and the atmospheric conditions in a specific geographic area. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8345914 and a significance level of p < 0.01, the findings suggest a statistically significant association between the two variables. Our results fuel the ongoing debate on the influence of personal nomenclature on local environmental factors and add a breath of fresh air to the field of name-based atmospheric research.

Dad Joke: Did you hear about the name Vanessa that polluted the air? It was quite an "air-iating" experience!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Gentle readers and esteemed members of the scientific community, welcome to a whimsical yet informative journey through the intriguing world of "Name Pollution." As we embark on this comical, yet intellectually stimulating endeavor, we shall unravel the remarkable relationship between the popularity of the first name Vanessa and the atmospheric quality in none other than the charming city of Huntington, West Virginia.
Dad Joke: What's the air's favorite type of name? The "atmos-pheric" kind, of course!
In recent years, research in the field of environmental science has broadened its horizons to include an unexpected variable – the names we bestow upon our fellow earth-dwellers. This study, shining a spotlight on the not-so-innocuous name Vanessa, aims to shed light on the impact of nomenclature on environmental conditions, all while maintaining a good sense of humor through the process.
Dad Joke: Why did the statistician break up with the scientist? He suspected she was "mean" about "median" research methods!
Now, you might wonder what drove us to scrutinize the name Vanessa specifically. As it turns out, this moniker has exhibited a peculiar pattern of popularity in Huntington, West Virginia, piquing our curiosity and sparking the flame of scientific inquiry. The natural question arose - could there be a correlation between the rise and fall of the name Vanessa and the ebb and flow of air pollution levels in this region? We embarked on our nerdy odyssey to find out.
Dad Joke: Did you hear about the statistician who wanted to be popular? He started gathering "mean" friends and formed a "significant" social circle!
Now, we cannot help but acknowledge the apparent absurdity of our hypothesis - after all, how could something as apparently inconsequential as a name relate to the serious issue of air quality? Yet, as the renowned scientist Marie Curie once said, "Nothing in life is to be feared; it is only to be understood." And so, armed with this wisdom and an unabashed love for a good pun, we delved into our analysis with gusto.
Dad Joke: Why do scientists enjoy nomenclature puns? Because they find them element-ary and eminently amus-ing, of course!
So, grab your lab coats and fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for a laughter-filled yet intellectually stimulating journey into the quirky world of name-based atmospheric research awaits. Let us explore the Vanessance of Air Quality in Huntington, WV and sift through the data with a keen eye, a quick wit, and, most importantly, a sense of scientific curiosity.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation of 0.8345914 between the popularity of the first name Vanessa and air pollution levels in Huntington, West Virginia from 1980 to 2022. The coefficient of determination, or R-squared value, further affirmed the robustness of this relationship, coming in at a hearty 0.6965428. The p-value, clocking in at less than 0.01, elicited a collective "wow" from the research team, indicating that this correlation is not just a fluke but rather a meaningful association worthy of further investigation.
Dad Joke: Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears!
Moving beyond the realm of numbers and into the realm of visuals, the findings are elegantly encapsulated in Figure 1. The scatterplot demonstrates a strikingly linear pattern, as if the name Vanessa and air pollution were engaged in a lively tango across the decades. One can almost hear the faint echoes of "Vanessa" in the wind amidst the backdrop of fluctuating pollution levels - truly a symphony of sound and smog.
Dad Joke: Did you hear about the air pollution data that got into a relationship with the name popularity data? It's like they were "pollu-mates" destined to be together!
In conclusion, the results of this investigation not only unravel a previously underappreciated link between nomenclature and environmental quality but also inject a hearty dose of levity into the typically austere realm of scientific inquiry. The "Vanessance" of Air Quality in Huntington, WV stands as a testament to the symbiotic dance between human culture and natural phenomena, highlighting the unforeseen ways in which our actions - and even our names - resonate with the world around us.
Dad Joke: How do scientists freshen their breath? With experi-mints and statisti-cool analysis!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In capturing the whimsical waltz of data, our research has unmasked the harmonious relationship between the popularity of the name Vanessa and air pollution levels in Huntington, WV. The statistics dance to the tune of a correlation coefficient of 0.8345914, reminding us that sometimes, life's greatest surprises come in the form of statistical significance. After all, who knew that the whispers of "Vanessa" could be intertwined with the whispers of air pollutants?

This study not only enriches the scholarly pursuit of understanding but also tickles the intellect with unexpected correlations, demonstrating that even in the serious realm of science, a dash of humor can be as refreshing as a breath of clean air. As we embrace the Vanessance of Air Quality in Huntington, WV, let us not forget that scientific inquiry can be both enlightening and entertaining.

To sum it up, our findings not only bring a breath of fresh air to the world of environmental research but also highlight the delightful potential of unexpected connections. With a good laugh and an appreciation for the curious ways of the universe, we can continue our scientific journey with a genuinely open mind and an eagerness to explore the unexpected.

No more research is needed in this area; we've already unraveled the intriguing dance between Vanessa and air pollution and are left breathless with our findings. It seems that when it comes to name-based atmospheric research, the air has already cleared!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Name Pollution: The Vanessance of Air Quality in Huntington, WV. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Environmental Hilarity


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Name Pollution: The Vanessance of Air Quality in Huntington, WV. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Environmental Air Quality Research (SEAQR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Name Pollution: The Vanessance of Air Quality in Huntington, WV with an abstract of The study examines the correlation between the popularity of the first name Vanessa and air pollution levels in Huntington, West Virginia. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency for the years 1980 to 2022, this research explores the link between a common name and the atmospheric conditions in a specific geographic area. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8345914 and a significance level of p < 0.01, the findings suggest a statistically significant association between the two variables. Our results fuel the ongoing debate on the influence of personal nomenclature on local environmental factors and add a breath of fresh air to the field of name-based atmospheric research.
Dad Joke: Did you hear about the name Vanessa that polluted the air? It was quite an "air-iating" experience!

ChatGPT:

Vanessa, Air pollution, Huntington WV, Name correlation, US Social Security Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, Atmospheric conditions, Geographic area, Correlation coefficient, Statistical significance, Personal nomenclature, Environmental factors, Name-based atmospheric research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Vanessa
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Vanessa
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Vanessa

Air pollution in Huntington, West Virginia
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Huntington, West Virginia

Correlation r = 0.8345914 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6965428 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 69.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Huntington, West Virginia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Vanessa) over the 43 years from 1980 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.5E-12. 0.0000000000035491423553747956
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 3.5E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 281,758,210,821 random variables You don't actually need 281 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 42 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 42 because we have two variables measured over a period of 43 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.71, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Vanessa (Babies born)4448477262066445719976087513739275887014644059536109591955705420576358165843529751474680445943584358410241744455403835222892262525532101193117291662151813781223137912221021
Air pollution in Huntington, West Virginia (Bad air quality days)7.692318.7671213.150718.356214.754115.068510.684918.630116.39347.6712311.232912.60275.737711.506812.602712.87678.196728.7671215.342518.08228.4699413.150714.79457.945211.366128.493159.1176515.06854.644810.5479454.657534.109593.551910.2739730.5479451.095890.8196721.095890.547945000.2739730




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4448,4772,6206,6445,7199,7608,7513,7392,7588,7014,6440,5953,6109,5919,5570,5420,5763,5816,5843,5297,5147,4680,4459,4358,4358,4102,4174,4455,4038,3522,2892,2625,2553,2101,1931,1729,1662,1518,1378,1223,1379,1222,1021,])
array_2 = np.array([7.69231,8.76712,13.1507,18.3562,14.7541,15.0685,10.6849,18.6301,16.3934,7.67123,11.2329,12.6027,5.7377,11.5068,12.6027,12.8767,8.19672,8.76712,15.3425,18.0822,8.46994,13.1507,14.7945,7.94521,1.36612,8.49315,9.11765,15.0685,4.64481,0.547945,4.65753,4.10959,3.55191,0.273973,0.547945,1.09589,0.819672,1.09589,0.547945,0,0,0.273973,0,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Vanessa"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Huntington, West Virginia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 5542 · Black Variable ID: 2096 · Red Variable ID: 20726
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0