about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,380 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How clickbait-y AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The louder the clickbait, the more it revs up the Mercedes recall engines!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image depicting a vibrant, futuristic YouTube video with a fiery red title that reads "5 Mind-Blowing Science Hacks that Will Blow Your Mind!" On the screen, an eye-catching Mercedes-Benz recalled vehicle races through a high-speed chase in the background, creating a sense of urgency. The juxtaposition of the captivating clickbait title and the intense automotive recalls should compete for attention, evoking a feeling of conflict and dual priorities. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How clickbait-y AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Pop art Parallax art 3D Pixar Style Futuristic Realistic
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How clickbait-y AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, in the following situation: The louder the clickbait, the more it revs up the Mercedes recall engines!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A bright red YouTube video titled "5 Mind-Blowing Science Hacks that Will Blow Your Mind!" flashes on the screen, with a Mercedes-Benz recalled vehicles being driven at high speed in the background. The clickbait title competes for attention with the urgency of the automotive recalls.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: A bright red YouTube video titled "5 Mind-Blowing Science Hacks that Will Blow Your Mind!" flashes on the screen, with a Mercedes-Benz recalled vehicles being driven at high speed in the background. The clickbait title competes for attention with the urgency of the automotive recalls. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image depicting a vibrant, futuristic YouTube video with a fiery red title that reads "5 Mind-Blowing Science Hacks that Will Blow Your Mind!" On the screen, an eye-catching Mercedes-Benz recalled vehicle races through a high-speed chase in the background, creating a sense of urgency. The juxtaposition of the captivating clickbait title and the intense automotive recalls should compete for attention, evoking a feeling of conflict and dual priorities.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in How clickbait-y AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are caused Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Clicks and the Recalls: A Correlation Between AsapSCIENCE YouTube Video Titles and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

The Journal of Unlikely Correlations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8812410 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Clicks and the Recalls: A Correlation Between AsapSCIENCE YouTube Video Titles and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the unlikely but intriguing connection between the clickbait-y nature of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. We employ a blend of social media analytics and automotive data to explore this relationship, using AI analysis of YouTube video titles and United States Department of Transportation (US DOT) records to unravel this peculiar correlation. Our research team has discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8812410 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2022, indicating a statistically significant association between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena.

It's often said that correlation does not imply causation, but in the world of clickbait and automotive recalls, we cannot help but think there might be some underlying factors at play. As we dug deeper into the data, we couldn't resist the urge to make a dad joke or two – after all, what's a research paper without a bit of levity? Speaking of which, why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!

Our findings shed light on the potential influence of clickbait elements in online content on consumer behavior, which in turn may have unforeseen implications for automotive industry trends. The unexpected intersection of digital engagement and vehicle safety prompts us to consider new avenues for future research in both marketing and automotive engineering. With these insights, we hope to inspire further investigation into the quirky connections between online media and real-world outcomes. As they say, it's all fun and games until someone divides by zero!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Clicks and the Recalls: A Correlation Between AsapSCIENCE YouTube Video Titles and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the unlikely but intriguing connection between the clickbait-y nature of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. We employ a blend of social media analytics and automotive data to explore this relationship, using AI analysis of YouTube video titles and United States Department of Transportation (US DOT) records to unravel this peculiar correlation. Our research team has discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8812410 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2022, indicating a statistically significant association between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena.

It's often said that correlation does not imply causation, but in the world of clickbait and automotive recalls, we cannot help but think there might be some underlying factors at play. As we dug deeper into the data, we couldn't resist the urge to make a dad joke or two – after all, what's a research paper without a bit of levity? Speaking of which, why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!

Our findings shed light on the potential influence of clickbait elements in online content on consumer behavior, which in turn may have unforeseen implications for automotive industry trends. The unexpected intersection of digital engagement and vehicle safety prompts us to consider new avenues for future research in both marketing and automotive engineering. With these insights, we hope to inspire further investigation into the quirky connections between online media and real-world outcomes. As they say, it's all fun and games until someone divides by zero!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The digital age has ushered in a new era of content consumption, where online platforms like YouTube serve as a bustling marketplace for ideas, entertainment, and information. As users navigate this virtual landscape, they encounter a diverse array of video titles vying for attention, employing various techniques to captivate potential viewers. Amidst this cacophony of clickable content, the realm of scientific edutainment has seen the rise of channels like AsapSCIENCE, known for their engaging and often sensational video titles.

At the same time, the automotive industry, with its own set of complexities and challenges, has faced the task of ensuring vehicle safety and performance. One notable player in this industry, Mercedes-Benz USA, has continually endeavored to uphold high standards of quality and reliability in its automobiles.

It's strange to think that these seemingly disparate domains – clickbait-y science videos and automotive recalls – could be linked in any way. Yet, as we dug into the data, we discovered an unexpected relationship that made us ponder how some things in life are truly interconnected – much like how our puns are corny yet "wheel-y" good.

Our study seeks to unravel this unlikely association, delving into the labyrinth of YouTube clickbait and the realm of automotive recalls. By analyzing over a decade's worth of AsapSCIENCE video titles and cross-referencing them with the records of automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, we aim to shed light on the interplay between digital engagement and real-world consumer behavior.

As we embarked on this research journey, we couldn't help but reminisce about the age-old question: why don't scientists trust staircases? Because they're always up to something! And much like staircases, the data revealed some intriguing patterns that invited us to ponder the underlying mechanisms driving this curious correlation.

Our investigation holds the promise of providing invaluable insights at the nexus of online content dynamics and consumer actions, offering implications for both digital media strategies and automotive safety measures. Through our commitment to scholarly inquiry and the occasional pun, we endeavor to chart new frontiers in understanding the peculiar links that bring together seemingly disparate facets of our modern world. After all, it's not every day that you get to ponder the relationship between viral video titles and vehicular mishaps – unless, of course, you're a researcher with a penchant for uncovering the unexpected.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Clicks and the Recalls: A Correlation Between AsapSCIENCE YouTube Video Titles and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the unlikely but intriguing connection between the clickbait-y nature of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. We employ a blend of social media analytics and automotive data to explore this relationship, using AI analysis of YouTube video titles and United States Department of Transportation (US DOT) records to unravel this peculiar correlation. Our research team has discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8812410 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2022, indicating a statistically significant association between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena.

It's often said that correlation does not imply causation, but in the world of clickbait and automotive recalls, we cannot help but think there might be some underlying factors at play. As we dug deeper into the data, we couldn't resist the urge to make a dad joke or two – after all, what's a research paper without a bit of levity? Speaking of which, why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!

Our findings shed light on the potential influence of clickbait elements in online content on consumer behavior, which in turn may have unforeseen implications for automotive industry trends. The unexpected intersection of digital engagement and vehicle safety prompts us to consider new avenues for future research in both marketing and automotive engineering. With these insights, we hope to inspire further investigation into the quirky connections between online media and real-world outcomes. As they say, it's all fun and games until someone divides by zero!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The digital age has ushered in a new era of content consumption, where online platforms like YouTube serve as a bustling marketplace for ideas, entertainment, and information. As users navigate this virtual landscape, they encounter a diverse array of video titles vying for attention, employing various techniques to captivate potential viewers. Amidst this cacophony of clickable content, the realm of scientific edutainment has seen the rise of channels like AsapSCIENCE, known for their engaging and often sensational video titles.
At the same time, the automotive industry, with its own set of complexities and challenges, has faced the task of ensuring vehicle safety and performance. One notable player in this industry, Mercedes-Benz USA, has continually endeavored to uphold high standards of quality and reliability in its automobiles.
It's strange to think that these seemingly disparate domains – clickbait-y science videos and automotive recalls – could be linked in any way. Yet, as we dug into the data, we discovered an unexpected relationship that made us ponder how some things in life are truly interconnected – much like how our puns are corny yet "wheel-y" good.
Our study seeks to unravel this unlikely association, delving into the labyrinth of YouTube clickbait and the realm of automotive recalls. By analyzing over a decade's worth of AsapSCIENCE video titles and cross-referencing them with the records of automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, we aim to shed light on the interplay between digital engagement and real-world consumer behavior.
As we embarked on this research journey, we couldn't help but reminisce about the age-old question: why don't scientists trust staircases? Because they're always up to something! And much like staircases, the data revealed some intriguing patterns that invited us to ponder the underlying mechanisms driving this curious correlation.
Our investigation holds the promise of providing invaluable insights at the nexus of online content dynamics and consumer actions, offering implications for both digital media strategies and automotive safety measures. Through our commitment to scholarly inquiry and the occasional pun, we endeavor to chart new frontiers in understanding the peculiar links that bring together seemingly disparate facets of our modern world. After all, it's not every day that you get to ponder the relationship between viral video titles and vehicular mishaps – unless, of course, you're a researcher with a penchant for uncovering the unexpected.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Clickbait and Online Engagement: A Comprehensive Analysis" by Smith et al., the authors find that the use of sensational language, exaggerated claims, and curiosity-piquing phrases in online content can significantly impact user engagement. This phenomenon, often referred to as clickbait, has been a subject of keen interest in the realm of digital marketing and media studies. The allure of clickbait lies in its ability to attract clicks and views, drawing users into a vortex of tantalizing promises and intriguing premises. It's like a siren's call for internet users – irresistible and sometimes leading to unforeseen outcomes.

Speaking of unforeseen outcomes, did you hear about the mathematician who's afraid of negative numbers? He'll stop at nothing to avoid them!

Moving on, "Consumer Behavior and Product Recalls: A Case Study Analysis" by Doe et al. highlights the impact of product quality and safety on consumer choices and brand perception. The authors elucidate how recalls and safety concerns can influence consumer behavior, affecting brand loyalty and market reputation. In the context of the automotive industry, recalls represent a critical dimension of vehicle safety and reliability, shaping consumer trust and purchase decisions. When it comes to car recalls, it's like the age-old debate about whether plastic surgery is a "stretch" or not – it certainly reshapes perceptions!

Now, let's shift gears and touch upon some non-fiction works that have indirectly influenced our exploration of the peculiar link between AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls. "Predictive Analytics in Automotive Engineering" by John H. Jones offers insights into the application of data analysis and predictive modeling in the automotive sector, emphasizing the significance of identifying potential safety concerns and performance issues. The intersection of data-driven approaches and automotive engineering unveils a world where numbers and narratives collide, much like the unexpected fusion of science communication and vehicular mishaps in our own research.

Speaking of unexpected fusions, have you heard about the crossover between a joke and a rhetorical question? Neither have I… but seriously, who knew?

Let's turn the page to fiction works that, while not directly related to our research, add a whimsical touch to our literature review. "The Curious Case of Clickbait Abbey" by Agatha Christie might sound like a quirky detective novel set in the world of online content creation, where enticing headlines lead to mysterious digital enigmas waiting to be unraveled. Meanwhile, "Recalls and Revelations: A Tale of Automotive Anomalies" by Arthur C. Clarke whimsically combines automotive intrigue with intellectual explorations, painting a surreal landscape where vehicles and video titles coalesce in unexpected ways.

In the realm of children's entertainment, we can draw lighthearted inspiration from animated shows such as "The Magic School Bus" and "Bob the Builder." While seemingly unrelated to our scholarly pursuits, these shows underscore the spirit of exploration and discovery, reminding us that even in the most unlikely connections, there lies a potential for uncovering something truly remarkable. It's almost like a scientific experiment – you mix two unexpected ingredients, and before you know it, you've got a reaction worthy of a Nobel Prize... or a groan-inducing pun at the very least!

Stay tuned for our next sections, where we dive into the methodology and results of our whimsical but insightful investigation. Remember, in the world of research, it's not just about the data – it's also about the journey, the surprises, and the occasional comedic relief. After all, why did the scientist install a knocker on his door? He wanted to win the No-bell prize!



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and US DOT . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Clicks and the Recalls: A Correlation Between AsapSCIENCE YouTube Video Titles and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the unlikely but intriguing connection between the clickbait-y nature of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. We employ a blend of social media analytics and automotive data to explore this relationship, using AI analysis of YouTube video titles and United States Department of Transportation (US DOT) records to unravel this peculiar correlation. Our research team has discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8812410 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2022, indicating a statistically significant association between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena.

It's often said that correlation does not imply causation, but in the world of clickbait and automotive recalls, we cannot help but think there might be some underlying factors at play. As we dug deeper into the data, we couldn't resist the urge to make a dad joke or two – after all, what's a research paper without a bit of levity? Speaking of which, why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!

Our findings shed light on the potential influence of clickbait elements in online content on consumer behavior, which in turn may have unforeseen implications for automotive industry trends. The unexpected intersection of digital engagement and vehicle safety prompts us to consider new avenues for future research in both marketing and automotive engineering. With these insights, we hope to inspire further investigation into the quirky connections between online media and real-world outcomes. As they say, it's all fun and games until someone divides by zero!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The digital age has ushered in a new era of content consumption, where online platforms like YouTube serve as a bustling marketplace for ideas, entertainment, and information. As users navigate this virtual landscape, they encounter a diverse array of video titles vying for attention, employing various techniques to captivate potential viewers. Amidst this cacophony of clickable content, the realm of scientific edutainment has seen the rise of channels like AsapSCIENCE, known for their engaging and often sensational video titles.
At the same time, the automotive industry, with its own set of complexities and challenges, has faced the task of ensuring vehicle safety and performance. One notable player in this industry, Mercedes-Benz USA, has continually endeavored to uphold high standards of quality and reliability in its automobiles.
It's strange to think that these seemingly disparate domains – clickbait-y science videos and automotive recalls – could be linked in any way. Yet, as we dug into the data, we discovered an unexpected relationship that made us ponder how some things in life are truly interconnected – much like how our puns are corny yet "wheel-y" good.
Our study seeks to unravel this unlikely association, delving into the labyrinth of YouTube clickbait and the realm of automotive recalls. By analyzing over a decade's worth of AsapSCIENCE video titles and cross-referencing them with the records of automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, we aim to shed light on the interplay between digital engagement and real-world consumer behavior.
As we embarked on this research journey, we couldn't help but reminisce about the age-old question: why don't scientists trust staircases? Because they're always up to something! And much like staircases, the data revealed some intriguing patterns that invited us to ponder the underlying mechanisms driving this curious correlation.
Our investigation holds the promise of providing invaluable insights at the nexus of online content dynamics and consumer actions, offering implications for both digital media strategies and automotive safety measures. Through our commitment to scholarly inquiry and the occasional pun, we endeavor to chart new frontiers in understanding the peculiar links that bring together seemingly disparate facets of our modern world. After all, it's not every day that you get to ponder the relationship between viral video titles and vehicular mishaps – unless, of course, you're a researcher with a penchant for uncovering the unexpected.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this study aimed to rigorously investigate the potential correlation between the clickbait characteristics of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the frequency of automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. To achieve this, our research team utilized a combination of social media analytics and automotive data mining, harnessing the power of artificial intelligence (AI) to parse through vast swathes of online content and regulatory records. As we embarked on this methodological odyssey, we couldn't resist the temptation to infuse a dose of humor into our scholarly pursuits – after all, what do you call a fake noodle? An impasta!

To initiate the investigation, we first compiled a comprehensive dataset of AsapSCIENCE video titles spanning the years 2012 to 2022. Leveraging AI-driven natural language processing algorithms, we systematically decoded the clickbait potential of each title, taking into account factors such as sensational language, curiosity gaps, and emotional triggers. However, unlike a poorly timed chemistry joke, we ensured that our analyses adhered to stringent statistical standards and methodological best practices.

Simultaneously, we delved into the regulatory archives of the United States Department of Transportation (US DOT) to extract detailed records of automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA during the same timeframe. The process of sifting through recall notifications and service campaign data might have been akin to searching for a particular car in a crowded parking lot – daunting but ultimately rewarding.

Following this data collection phase, our team employed a series of advanced statistical methods, including Pearson correlation coefficients, regression analyses, and pattern recognition algorithms to examine the potential association between the clickbait quotient of AsapSCIENCE video titles and the incidence of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. We approached these analyses with the precision of a mathematician and the fervor of a dad telling geometry puns – always acute, never obtuse.

Furthermore, to account for potential confounding variables and spurious correlations, we meticulously controlled for factors such as vehicle model year, technological advancements in automotive engineering, and shifts in digital media consumption patterns. It was a bit like untangling a particularly stubborn knot, but we remained undeterred in our quest for methodological clarity and empirical rigor.

Lastly, to contextualize our findings within the broader landscape of digital media influence and consumer behavior, we supplemented our quantitative analyses with qualitative insights derived from expert interviews and industry discussions. This diversification of methodological approaches allowed us to capture the nuanced interplay between online content engagement and real-world consumer decisions, whilst also providing an opportunity to sprinkle the occasional pun into our scholarly discourse – much like a sprinkle of paprika on a research paper.

In conclusion, the methodology underpinning our investigation combined the precision of statistical analyses with the creativity of social media parsing, demonstrating our dedication to unearthing the unexpected connections that underpin our modern world. In the immortal words of Sir Isaac Newton – "If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants" – or by indulging in the occasional dad joke to liven up the scholarly pursuit.

The Starbucks barista was shy, but as a researcher, I finally figured him out. He was just venti-ng his feelings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and US DOT .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8812410, r-squared of 0.7765857, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Clicks and the Recalls: A Correlation Between AsapSCIENCE YouTube Video Titles and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the unlikely but intriguing connection between the clickbait-y nature of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. We employ a blend of social media analytics and automotive data to explore this relationship, using AI analysis of YouTube video titles and United States Department of Transportation (US DOT) records to unravel this peculiar correlation. Our research team has discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8812410 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2022, indicating a statistically significant association between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena.

It's often said that correlation does not imply causation, but in the world of clickbait and automotive recalls, we cannot help but think there might be some underlying factors at play. As we dug deeper into the data, we couldn't resist the urge to make a dad joke or two – after all, what's a research paper without a bit of levity? Speaking of which, why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!

Our findings shed light on the potential influence of clickbait elements in online content on consumer behavior, which in turn may have unforeseen implications for automotive industry trends. The unexpected intersection of digital engagement and vehicle safety prompts us to consider new avenues for future research in both marketing and automotive engineering. With these insights, we hope to inspire further investigation into the quirky connections between online media and real-world outcomes. As they say, it's all fun and games until someone divides by zero!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The digital age has ushered in a new era of content consumption, where online platforms like YouTube serve as a bustling marketplace for ideas, entertainment, and information. As users navigate this virtual landscape, they encounter a diverse array of video titles vying for attention, employing various techniques to captivate potential viewers. Amidst this cacophony of clickable content, the realm of scientific edutainment has seen the rise of channels like AsapSCIENCE, known for their engaging and often sensational video titles.
At the same time, the automotive industry, with its own set of complexities and challenges, has faced the task of ensuring vehicle safety and performance. One notable player in this industry, Mercedes-Benz USA, has continually endeavored to uphold high standards of quality and reliability in its automobiles.
It's strange to think that these seemingly disparate domains – clickbait-y science videos and automotive recalls – could be linked in any way. Yet, as we dug into the data, we discovered an unexpected relationship that made us ponder how some things in life are truly interconnected – much like how our puns are corny yet "wheel-y" good.
Our study seeks to unravel this unlikely association, delving into the labyrinth of YouTube clickbait and the realm of automotive recalls. By analyzing over a decade's worth of AsapSCIENCE video titles and cross-referencing them with the records of automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, we aim to shed light on the interplay between digital engagement and real-world consumer behavior.
As we embarked on this research journey, we couldn't help but reminisce about the age-old question: why don't scientists trust staircases? Because they're always up to something! And much like staircases, the data revealed some intriguing patterns that invited us to ponder the underlying mechanisms driving this curious correlation.
Our investigation holds the promise of providing invaluable insights at the nexus of online content dynamics and consumer actions, offering implications for both digital media strategies and automotive safety measures. Through our commitment to scholarly inquiry and the occasional pun, we endeavor to chart new frontiers in understanding the peculiar links that bring together seemingly disparate facets of our modern world. After all, it's not every day that you get to ponder the relationship between viral video titles and vehicular mishaps – unless, of course, you're a researcher with a penchant for uncovering the unexpected.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of our data revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8812410 between the clickbait-y nature of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA for the period spanning from 2012 to 2022. The r-squared value of 0.7765857 further underscored the robustness of this association, providing evidence of a noteworthy relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The p-value of less than 0.01 solidified the statistical significance of our findings, leaving little room to doubt the existence of a substantial connection.

We present our findings graphically in Figure 1, displaying a scatterplot that visually captures the prominent correlation between the clickbait tendencies of AsapSCIENCE video titles and the occurrences of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. The unmistakable clustering of data points in the plot serves as a compelling visual representation of the observed relationship, reminding us that sometimes, truth truly is stranger than fiction.

As we reflected on these results, we couldn't resist a well-timed dad joke. Why don't cars like jokes? Because they tend to get tired of the same old "exhausting" puns!

These significant findings prompt us to consider the implications of clickbait elements in online content for consumer behavior, particularly in the context of automotive industry dynamics. The unexpected convergence of digital engagement and vehicular safety suggests a nuanced interplay that beckons further exploration and analysis, much like how a good joke becomes even better with an unexpected punchline.

Our research adds a quirky dimension to the discourse on the influence of online media on consumer choices, offering a fresh perspective that opens doors to novel avenues for future inquiry. After all, as researchers, it's our duty to remain curious and inquisitive – even if it means contemplating the whimsical interconnection of clickbait and automotive recalls. As they say, the road to discovery is paved with unexpected correlations!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Clicks and the Recalls: A Correlation Between AsapSCIENCE YouTube Video Titles and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the unlikely but intriguing connection between the clickbait-y nature of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. We employ a blend of social media analytics and automotive data to explore this relationship, using AI analysis of YouTube video titles and United States Department of Transportation (US DOT) records to unravel this peculiar correlation. Our research team has discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8812410 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2022, indicating a statistically significant association between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena.

It's often said that correlation does not imply causation, but in the world of clickbait and automotive recalls, we cannot help but think there might be some underlying factors at play. As we dug deeper into the data, we couldn't resist the urge to make a dad joke or two – after all, what's a research paper without a bit of levity? Speaking of which, why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!

Our findings shed light on the potential influence of clickbait elements in online content on consumer behavior, which in turn may have unforeseen implications for automotive industry trends. The unexpected intersection of digital engagement and vehicle safety prompts us to consider new avenues for future research in both marketing and automotive engineering. With these insights, we hope to inspire further investigation into the quirky connections between online media and real-world outcomes. As they say, it's all fun and games until someone divides by zero!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Clickbait and Online Engagement: A Comprehensive Analysis" by Smith et al., the authors find that the use of sensational language, exaggerated claims, and curiosity-piquing phrases in online content can significantly impact user engagement. This phenomenon, often referred to as clickbait, has been a subject of keen interest in the realm of digital marketing and media studies. The allure of clickbait lies in its ability to attract clicks and views, drawing users into a vortex of tantalizing promises and intriguing premises. It's like a siren's call for internet users – irresistible and sometimes leading to unforeseen outcomes.
Speaking of unforeseen outcomes, did you hear about the mathematician who's afraid of negative numbers? He'll stop at nothing to avoid them!
Moving on, "Consumer Behavior and Product Recalls: A Case Study Analysis" by Doe et al. highlights the impact of product quality and safety on consumer choices and brand perception. The authors elucidate how recalls and safety concerns can influence consumer behavior, affecting brand loyalty and market reputation. In the context of the automotive industry, recalls represent a critical dimension of vehicle safety and reliability, shaping consumer trust and purchase decisions. When it comes to car recalls, it's like the age-old debate about whether plastic surgery is a "stretch" or not – it certainly reshapes perceptions!
Now, let's shift gears and touch upon some non-fiction works that have indirectly influenced our exploration of the peculiar link between AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls. "Predictive Analytics in Automotive Engineering" by John H. Jones offers insights into the application of data analysis and predictive modeling in the automotive sector, emphasizing the significance of identifying potential safety concerns and performance issues. The intersection of data-driven approaches and automotive engineering unveils a world where numbers and narratives collide, much like the unexpected fusion of science communication and vehicular mishaps in our own research.
Speaking of unexpected fusions, have you heard about the crossover between a joke and a rhetorical question? Neither have I… but seriously, who knew?
Let's turn the page to fiction works that, while not directly related to our research, add a whimsical touch to our literature review. "The Curious Case of Clickbait Abbey" by Agatha Christie might sound like a quirky detective novel set in the world of online content creation, where enticing headlines lead to mysterious digital enigmas waiting to be unraveled. Meanwhile, "Recalls and Revelations: A Tale of Automotive Anomalies" by Arthur C. Clarke whimsically combines automotive intrigue with intellectual explorations, painting a surreal landscape where vehicles and video titles coalesce in unexpected ways.
In the realm of children's entertainment, we can draw lighthearted inspiration from animated shows such as "The Magic School Bus" and "Bob the Builder." While seemingly unrelated to our scholarly pursuits, these shows underscore the spirit of exploration and discovery, reminding us that even in the most unlikely connections, there lies a potential for uncovering something truly remarkable. It's almost like a scientific experiment – you mix two unexpected ingredients, and before you know it, you've got a reaction worthy of a Nobel Prize... or a groan-inducing pun at the very least!
Stay tuned for our next sections, where we dive into the methodology and results of our whimsical but insightful investigation. Remember, in the world of research, it's not just about the data – it's also about the journey, the surprises, and the occasional comedic relief. After all, why did the scientist install a knocker on his door? He wanted to win the No-bell prize!


[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of our data revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8812410 between the clickbait-y nature of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA for the period spanning from 2012 to 2022. The r-squared value of 0.7765857 further underscored the robustness of this association, providing evidence of a noteworthy relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The p-value of less than 0.01 solidified the statistical significance of our findings, leaving little room to doubt the existence of a substantial connection.
We present our findings graphically in Figure 1, displaying a scatterplot that visually captures the prominent correlation between the clickbait tendencies of AsapSCIENCE video titles and the occurrences of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. The unmistakable clustering of data points in the plot serves as a compelling visual representation of the observed relationship, reminding us that sometimes, truth truly is stranger than fiction.
As we reflected on these results, we couldn't resist a well-timed dad joke. Why don't cars like jokes? Because they tend to get tired of the same old "exhausting" puns!
These significant findings prompt us to consider the implications of clickbait elements in online content for consumer behavior, particularly in the context of automotive industry dynamics. The unexpected convergence of digital engagement and vehicular safety suggests a nuanced interplay that beckons further exploration and analysis, much like how a good joke becomes even better with an unexpected punchline.
Our research adds a quirky dimension to the discourse on the influence of online media on consumer choices, offering a fresh perspective that opens doors to novel avenues for future inquiry. After all, as researchers, it's our duty to remain curious and inquisitive – even if it means contemplating the whimsical interconnection of clickbait and automotive recalls. As they say, the road to discovery is paved with unexpected correlations!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our research has unearthed a noteworthy and statistically significant correlation between the clickbait nature of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the frequency of automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. These findings align with prior research on the impact of clickbait elements in online content on user engagement and consumer behavior. It's as if the allure of clickbait has extended its reach from capturing online attention to potentially influencing real-world outcomes, much like a magnetic force drawing unsuspecting users into a sea of tantalizing thumbnails and spellbinding titles.

The robust correlation coefficient and r-squared value derived from our analysis validate the association between clickbait tendencies and automotive recalls, lending credence to the hypothesis that the digital landscape may exert an unforeseen influence on consumer decisions in the automotive sphere. It's almost like the plot of a thrilling mystery novel – except in this case, the clues are buried in AI-analyzed video titles and DOT records, waiting to be deciphered by intrepid researchers armed with statistical tools and a penchant for unexpected connections.

Our results align with previous studies emphasizing the pivotal role of product quality and safety concerns in shaping consumer choices and brand perception. The correlation we've uncovered underscores the potential impact of digital content on consumer decision-making, with clickbait elements possibly influencing perceptions of automotive brands and safety considerations. It's like a high-stakes game of online engagement, where the winners earn clicks and the losers risk triggering a recall – a digital duel with tangible consequences for the automotive industry.

Moving forward, our findings prompt us to contemplate the broader implications of clickbait elements in digital media on consumer behavior in the automotive domain. It's akin to peering into a kaleidoscope of online trends and market dynamics, where the unexpected convergence of science communication and automotive safety transcends conventional boundaries, much like a joke that delivers an unexpectedly profound insight amidst its lighthearted facade.

In essence, our research not only unravels an intriguing correlation but also beckons further investigation into the intricate interplay between online engagement and real-world phenomena. The intersection of digital content and automotive recalls offers a captivating glimpse into the potential ripple effects of digital media on consumer behavior, reminding us that in the scientific pursuit of knowledge, even the most unconventional linkages merit thoughtful consideration. After all, who would have thought that an unsuspecting YouTube video title could hold the key to unraveling automotive recall patterns – a true testament to the whimsical yet revelatory nature of academic inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Clicks and the Recalls: A Correlation Between AsapSCIENCE YouTube Video Titles and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the unlikely but intriguing connection between the clickbait-y nature of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. We employ a blend of social media analytics and automotive data to explore this relationship, using AI analysis of YouTube video titles and United States Department of Transportation (US DOT) records to unravel this peculiar correlation. Our research team has discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8812410 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2022, indicating a statistically significant association between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena.

It's often said that correlation does not imply causation, but in the world of clickbait and automotive recalls, we cannot help but think there might be some underlying factors at play. As we dug deeper into the data, we couldn't resist the urge to make a dad joke or two – after all, what's a research paper without a bit of levity? Speaking of which, why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!

Our findings shed light on the potential influence of clickbait elements in online content on consumer behavior, which in turn may have unforeseen implications for automotive industry trends. The unexpected intersection of digital engagement and vehicle safety prompts us to consider new avenues for future research in both marketing and automotive engineering. With these insights, we hope to inspire further investigation into the quirky connections between online media and real-world outcomes. As they say, it's all fun and games until someone divides by zero!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The digital age has ushered in a new era of content consumption, where online platforms like YouTube serve as a bustling marketplace for ideas, entertainment, and information. As users navigate this virtual landscape, they encounter a diverse array of video titles vying for attention, employing various techniques to captivate potential viewers. Amidst this cacophony of clickable content, the realm of scientific edutainment has seen the rise of channels like AsapSCIENCE, known for their engaging and often sensational video titles.
At the same time, the automotive industry, with its own set of complexities and challenges, has faced the task of ensuring vehicle safety and performance. One notable player in this industry, Mercedes-Benz USA, has continually endeavored to uphold high standards of quality and reliability in its automobiles.
It's strange to think that these seemingly disparate domains – clickbait-y science videos and automotive recalls – could be linked in any way. Yet, as we dug into the data, we discovered an unexpected relationship that made us ponder how some things in life are truly interconnected – much like how our puns are corny yet "wheel-y" good.
Our study seeks to unravel this unlikely association, delving into the labyrinth of YouTube clickbait and the realm of automotive recalls. By analyzing over a decade's worth of AsapSCIENCE video titles and cross-referencing them with the records of automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, we aim to shed light on the interplay between digital engagement and real-world consumer behavior.
As we embarked on this research journey, we couldn't help but reminisce about the age-old question: why don't scientists trust staircases? Because they're always up to something! And much like staircases, the data revealed some intriguing patterns that invited us to ponder the underlying mechanisms driving this curious correlation.
Our investigation holds the promise of providing invaluable insights at the nexus of online content dynamics and consumer actions, offering implications for both digital media strategies and automotive safety measures. Through our commitment to scholarly inquiry and the occasional pun, we endeavor to chart new frontiers in understanding the peculiar links that bring together seemingly disparate facets of our modern world. After all, it's not every day that you get to ponder the relationship between viral video titles and vehicular mishaps – unless, of course, you're a researcher with a penchant for uncovering the unexpected.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of our data revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8812410 between the clickbait-y nature of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA for the period spanning from 2012 to 2022. The r-squared value of 0.7765857 further underscored the robustness of this association, providing evidence of a noteworthy relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The p-value of less than 0.01 solidified the statistical significance of our findings, leaving little room to doubt the existence of a substantial connection.
We present our findings graphically in Figure 1, displaying a scatterplot that visually captures the prominent correlation between the clickbait tendencies of AsapSCIENCE video titles and the occurrences of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. The unmistakable clustering of data points in the plot serves as a compelling visual representation of the observed relationship, reminding us that sometimes, truth truly is stranger than fiction.
As we reflected on these results, we couldn't resist a well-timed dad joke. Why don't cars like jokes? Because they tend to get tired of the same old "exhausting" puns!
These significant findings prompt us to consider the implications of clickbait elements in online content for consumer behavior, particularly in the context of automotive industry dynamics. The unexpected convergence of digital engagement and vehicular safety suggests a nuanced interplay that beckons further exploration and analysis, much like how a good joke becomes even better with an unexpected punchline.
Our research adds a quirky dimension to the discourse on the influence of online media on consumer choices, offering a fresh perspective that opens doors to novel avenues for future inquiry. After all, as researchers, it's our duty to remain curious and inquisitive – even if it means contemplating the whimsical interconnection of clickbait and automotive recalls. As they say, the road to discovery is paved with unexpected correlations!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has unveiled a surprising and statistically significant correlation between the clickbait-y nature of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8812410 and the p-value of less than 0.01 underscore the strength and statistical significance of this peculiar relationship.

As we wrap up our findings, we can't help but interject with a dad joke to lighten the scholarly mood. Why did the car's navigation system break up with the driver? It couldn't stand being taken for a ride anymore!

Our study provides valuable insights into the potential impact of clickbait elements in online content on real-world consumer behavior, particularly within the context of automotive industry dynamics. This unexpected convergence calls for continued exploration, much like how a car calls for regular maintenance – we simply can't ignore the signs.

These results prompt us to consider novel avenues for future research in both marketing and automotive engineering, delving deeper into the quirky connections between online media and tangible outcomes. As we sign off, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, or else we might get stuck in an endless loop of unexpected correlations – much like a car caught in rush hour traffic!

Until next time, may your data be robust, your hypotheses significant, and your dad jokes delightfully cheesy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Clicks and the Recalls: A Correlation Between AsapSCIENCE YouTube Video Titles and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Unlikely Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Clicks and the Recalls: A Correlation Between AsapSCIENCE YouTube Video Titles and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Consortium for Internet Culture and Automotive Safety Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Clicks and the Recalls: A Correlation Between AsapSCIENCE YouTube Video Titles and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the unlikely but intriguing connection between the clickbait-y nature of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. We employ a blend of social media analytics and automotive data to explore this relationship, using AI analysis of YouTube video titles and United States Department of Transportation (US DOT) records to unravel this peculiar correlation. Our research team has discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8812410 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2022, indicating a statistically significant association between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena.
It's often said that correlation does not imply causation, but in the world of clickbait and automotive recalls, we cannot help but think there might be some underlying factors at play. As we dug deeper into the data, we couldn't resist the urge to make a dad joke or two – after all, what's a research paper without a bit of levity? Speaking of which, why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!
Our findings shed light on the potential influence of clickbait elements in online content on consumer behavior, which in turn may have unforeseen implications for automotive industry trends. The unexpected intersection of digital engagement and vehicle safety prompts us to consider new avenues for future research in both marketing and automotive engineering. With these insights, we hope to inspire further investigation into the quirky connections between online media and real-world outcomes. As they say, it's all fun and games until someone divides by zero!

ChatGPT:

AsapSCIENCE, YouTube video titles, clickbait, Mercedes-Benz USA, automotive recalls, correlation, social media analytics, automotive data, AI analysis, YouTube video titles analysis, United States Department of Transportation, US DOT records, research paper, statistical analysis, consumer behavior, online content influence, automotive industry trends, digital engagement, vehicle safety, marketing, automotive engineering, quirky connections, online media, real-world outcomes, future research, correlation coefficient, p-value, significance level

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How clickbait-y AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How clickbait-y AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How clickbait-y AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are

Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA
Detailed data title: Automotive recals issued by Mercedes-Benz USA
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA

Correlation r = 0.8812410 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7765857 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 77.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How clickbait-y AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00034. 0.0003371959903531726700000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.88 in 0.034% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,966 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.6, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
How clickbait-y AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are (Clickbait-y score)4.333354.69235.35565.27275.41675.77365.29635.53576.21055.7358
Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA (Recalls)8461823383933384935




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.3333,5,4.6923,5.3556,5.2727,5.4167,5.7736,5.2963,5.5357,6.2105,5.7358,])
array_2 = np.array([8,4,6,18,23,38,39,33,38,49,35,])
array_1_name = "How clickbait-y AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 5380 · Black Variable ID: 25841 · Red Variable ID: 1122
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0