about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,279 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Kerosene used in Libya and the second variable is Total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As kerosene use in Libya increases, more and more evening conversations are being lit up with fiery debates about physics, causing a surge in interest and engagement with minutephysics videos. Who knew that the key to unlocking the secrets of the universe lay in the burning questions sparked by kerosene usage in Libya?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ a meme ] Generate an image of a dimly lit room in Libya with a kerosene lamp glowing brightly, illuminating the animated faces of a group of people engaged in fervent discussion about physics. Show the energy and excitement filling the room as the mobile phone in the background displays the rapidly rising total likes on minutephysics YouTube videos, indicating that more and more people are captivated by the fiery discussions sparked by the kerosene-fueled conversations. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Kerosene used in Libya and Total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A scene from Skyrim Pop art Magic realism Minimalism a meme
ChatGPT: a meme

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Kerosene used in Libya and Total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos, in the following situation: As kerosene use in Libya increases, more and more evening conversations are being lit up with fiery debates about physics, causing a surge in interest and engagement with minutephysics videos. Who knew that the key to unlocking the secrets of the universe lay in the burning questions sparked by kerosene usage in Libya?. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a dimly lit room in Libya, a kerosene lamp glows brightly, illuminating the animated faces of a group of people engaged in fervent discussion. As the debate about physics heats up, the room becomes filled with energy and excitement. In the background, a mobile phone screen shows the total likes on minutephysics YouTube videos rapidly rising as more and more people become captivated by the fiery discussions sparked by the kerosene-fueled conversations.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a meme ] and depicting this scene: In a dimly lit room in Libya, a kerosene lamp glows brightly, illuminating the animated faces of a group of people engaged in fervent discussion. As the debate about physics heats up, the room becomes filled with energy and excitement. In the background, a mobile phone screen shows the total likes on minutephysics YouTube videos rapidly rising as more and more people become captivated by the fiery discussions sparked by the kerosene-fueled conversations. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ a meme ] Generate an image of a dimly lit room in Libya with a kerosene lamp glowing brightly, illuminating the animated faces of a group of people engaged in fervent discussion about physics. Show the energy and excitement filling the room as the mobile phone in the background displays the rapidly rising total likes on minutephysics YouTube videos, indicating that more and more people are captivated by the fiery discussions sparked by the kerosene-fueled conversations.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Kerosene used in Libya positively influenced Total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Kerosene Connections: Illuminating the Relationship Between Libyan Fuel Use and YouTube Engagement

The International Journal of Energy Sociology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Kerosene used in Libya and Total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8662683 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Kerosene Connections: Illuminating the Relationship Between Libyan Fuel Use and YouTube Engagement"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we shed light on the intriguing relationship between kerosene consumption in Libya and the total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, we sought to uncover any potential connection between these seemingly disparate variables. To our delight, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8662683 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021.

Our analysis not only points to a statistically significant association between the two phenomena but also presents an opportunity for a humorous interpretation. Just as kerosene has been a source of illumination for countless households, our research suggests that it may have "fueled" the engagement with physics content on YouTube. It seems that the fascination with minutephysics videos has sparked quite the "ignition" among viewers—perhaps kerosene and kinetic energy share a "light-hearted" connection after all.

These unexpected findings not only contribute to the understanding of energy usage and online engagement but also serve as a reminder that in the world of statistical analysis, even the most seemingly unrelated elements may have a "bright" point of convergence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Kerosene used in Libya and Total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Kerosene Connections: Illuminating the Relationship Between Libyan Fuel Use and YouTube Engagement"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we shed light on the intriguing relationship between kerosene consumption in Libya and the total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, we sought to uncover any potential connection between these seemingly disparate variables. To our delight, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8662683 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021.

Our analysis not only points to a statistically significant association between the two phenomena but also presents an opportunity for a humorous interpretation. Just as kerosene has been a source of illumination for countless households, our research suggests that it may have "fueled" the engagement with physics content on YouTube. It seems that the fascination with minutephysics videos has sparked quite the "ignition" among viewers—perhaps kerosene and kinetic energy share a "light-hearted" connection after all.

These unexpected findings not only contribute to the understanding of energy usage and online engagement but also serve as a reminder that in the world of statistical analysis, even the most seemingly unrelated elements may have a "bright" point of convergence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The link between energy consumption and online behavior has become an area of growing interest in recent years, as researchers seek to understand the subtle and unexpected connections that underlie our modern, interconnected world. In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between kerosene usage in Libya and the total likes garnered by minutephysics YouTube videos. This investigation emerges from the desire to illuminate the potential interplay between traditional energy sources and digital engagement.

The correlation coefficient of 0.8662683 and p < 0.01, as presented in the abstract, sets the stage for a robust analysis of the relationship between kerosene consumption and YouTube viewership. It appears that the flickering flames of kerosene lamps may have kindled more than just light; they may have ignited a spark of interest in the physics-oriented content provided by minutephysics. It seems that Libyans aren't just turning on kerosene lamps—they're also turning on to physics!

On a more serious note, understanding these unexpected connections offers a unique window into the interconnectedness of human behavior and the global energy landscape. As we navigate through the labyrinth of data, it becomes clear that even seemingly unrelated variables can display a remarkable degree of correlation. It's as if statistical analysis holds the key to unlocking the hidden "epiphanies" of everyday life.

As researchers, we persist in our quest for knowledge and often stumble across unexpected and, dare I say, "illuminating" findings. The association between kerosene usage and YouTube engagement may at first glance seem as incongruous as, well, a physics problem set in the desert. However, every statistical investigation may bring an "en-lightening" moment, shedding beams of insight on the seemingly disparate elements of our world.

Our endeavor is not only to draw attention to this intriguing correlation but also to underscore the importance of keeping an open mind in the pursuit of knowledge. In the landscape of statistical inquiry, every data point represents a potential revelation, and sometimes, the most unlikely pairings may end up revealing the brightest connections.

As we embark on this journey into the labyrinth of statistical analysis and its unexpected intersections, it is our hope that this study will not only illuminate the kerosene-YouTube engagement relationship but also spark a flame of curiosity in the minds of fellow researchers. After all, in the world of statistical inquiry, every "lightbulb" moment counts, no matter how surprising.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Kerosene used in Libya and Total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Kerosene Connections: Illuminating the Relationship Between Libyan Fuel Use and YouTube Engagement"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we shed light on the intriguing relationship between kerosene consumption in Libya and the total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, we sought to uncover any potential connection between these seemingly disparate variables. To our delight, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8662683 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021.

Our analysis not only points to a statistically significant association between the two phenomena but also presents an opportunity for a humorous interpretation. Just as kerosene has been a source of illumination for countless households, our research suggests that it may have "fueled" the engagement with physics content on YouTube. It seems that the fascination with minutephysics videos has sparked quite the "ignition" among viewers—perhaps kerosene and kinetic energy share a "light-hearted" connection after all.

These unexpected findings not only contribute to the understanding of energy usage and online engagement but also serve as a reminder that in the world of statistical analysis, even the most seemingly unrelated elements may have a "bright" point of convergence.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The link between energy consumption and online behavior has become an area of growing interest in recent years, as researchers seek to understand the subtle and unexpected connections that underlie our modern, interconnected world. In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between kerosene usage in Libya and the total likes garnered by minutephysics YouTube videos. This investigation emerges from the desire to illuminate the potential interplay between traditional energy sources and digital engagement.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8662683 and p < 0.01, as presented in the abstract, sets the stage for a robust analysis of the relationship between kerosene consumption and YouTube viewership. It appears that the flickering flames of kerosene lamps may have kindled more than just light; they may have ignited a spark of interest in the physics-oriented content provided by minutephysics. It seems that Libyans aren't just turning on kerosene lamps—they're also turning on to physics!
On a more serious note, understanding these unexpected connections offers a unique window into the interconnectedness of human behavior and the global energy landscape. As we navigate through the labyrinth of data, it becomes clear that even seemingly unrelated variables can display a remarkable degree of correlation. It's as if statistical analysis holds the key to unlocking the hidden "epiphanies" of everyday life.
As researchers, we persist in our quest for knowledge and often stumble across unexpected and, dare I say, "illuminating" findings. The association between kerosene usage and YouTube engagement may at first glance seem as incongruous as, well, a physics problem set in the desert. However, every statistical investigation may bring an "en-lightening" moment, shedding beams of insight on the seemingly disparate elements of our world.
Our endeavor is not only to draw attention to this intriguing correlation but also to underscore the importance of keeping an open mind in the pursuit of knowledge. In the landscape of statistical inquiry, every data point represents a potential revelation, and sometimes, the most unlikely pairings may end up revealing the brightest connections.
As we embark on this journey into the labyrinth of statistical analysis and its unexpected intersections, it is our hope that this study will not only illuminate the kerosene-YouTube engagement relationship but also spark a flame of curiosity in the minds of fellow researchers. After all, in the world of statistical inquiry, every "lightbulb" moment counts, no matter how surprising.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith and Doe" (2017), the authors investigate the link between kerosene consumption in Libya and its potential impact on online engagement. The study provides a comprehensive analysis of household kerosene use and its correlation with digital interactions. Meanwhile, "Jones" (2018) presents a complementary perspective, delving into the psychological factors that may influence online activity in regions where kerosene is a prevalent energy source. These initial studies lay the groundwork for our exploration into the unforeseen connection between kerosene usage and YouTube viewership.

Now, let's turn the page to "The Kerosene Chronicles" by Laura Lighter, which sheds a "bright" spotlight on the historical significance of kerosene and its cultural implications. Similarly, "Fueling the Future: Energy Dynamics in the 21st Century" by E. N. Gage delves into the broader context of energy consumption, weaving a tale of interconnectedness that extends from traditional fuel sources to the digital realm.

In a surprising twist of literary connections, "The Illuminating Adventures of Physics Phil" by Isaac Newton finds our protagonist unraveling the mysteries of physics through a series of animated adventures. While not a traditional research publication, this children's book mirrors our own pursuit of illuminating the unexpected links between kerosene and YouTube engagement. Additionally, "The Magic School Bus Explores Light" offers an educational journey that parallels our own quest to shed light on the unexplored connections between energy use and online activity.

As we peer through the lens of statistical analysis, it becomes evident that the universe is full of surprising correlations and pun-intended revelations. Just as a kerosene lamp casts a warm glow in a darkened room, our findings illuminate the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that in the world of statistical inquiry, even the most unassuming pairings can ignite a spark of insight. After all, statistical analysis is much like a well-timed dad joke—it may catch you off guard, but it leaves a lasting impression.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Kerosene used in Libya and Total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and YouTube . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Kerosene Connections: Illuminating the Relationship Between Libyan Fuel Use and YouTube Engagement"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we shed light on the intriguing relationship between kerosene consumption in Libya and the total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, we sought to uncover any potential connection between these seemingly disparate variables. To our delight, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8662683 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021.

Our analysis not only points to a statistically significant association between the two phenomena but also presents an opportunity for a humorous interpretation. Just as kerosene has been a source of illumination for countless households, our research suggests that it may have "fueled" the engagement with physics content on YouTube. It seems that the fascination with minutephysics videos has sparked quite the "ignition" among viewers—perhaps kerosene and kinetic energy share a "light-hearted" connection after all.

These unexpected findings not only contribute to the understanding of energy usage and online engagement but also serve as a reminder that in the world of statistical analysis, even the most seemingly unrelated elements may have a "bright" point of convergence.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The link between energy consumption and online behavior has become an area of growing interest in recent years, as researchers seek to understand the subtle and unexpected connections that underlie our modern, interconnected world. In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between kerosene usage in Libya and the total likes garnered by minutephysics YouTube videos. This investigation emerges from the desire to illuminate the potential interplay between traditional energy sources and digital engagement.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8662683 and p < 0.01, as presented in the abstract, sets the stage for a robust analysis of the relationship between kerosene consumption and YouTube viewership. It appears that the flickering flames of kerosene lamps may have kindled more than just light; they may have ignited a spark of interest in the physics-oriented content provided by minutephysics. It seems that Libyans aren't just turning on kerosene lamps—they're also turning on to physics!
On a more serious note, understanding these unexpected connections offers a unique window into the interconnectedness of human behavior and the global energy landscape. As we navigate through the labyrinth of data, it becomes clear that even seemingly unrelated variables can display a remarkable degree of correlation. It's as if statistical analysis holds the key to unlocking the hidden "epiphanies" of everyday life.
As researchers, we persist in our quest for knowledge and often stumble across unexpected and, dare I say, "illuminating" findings. The association between kerosene usage and YouTube engagement may at first glance seem as incongruous as, well, a physics problem set in the desert. However, every statistical investigation may bring an "en-lightening" moment, shedding beams of insight on the seemingly disparate elements of our world.
Our endeavor is not only to draw attention to this intriguing correlation but also to underscore the importance of keeping an open mind in the pursuit of knowledge. In the landscape of statistical inquiry, every data point represents a potential revelation, and sometimes, the most unlikely pairings may end up revealing the brightest connections.
As we embark on this journey into the labyrinth of statistical analysis and its unexpected intersections, it is our hope that this study will not only illuminate the kerosene-YouTube engagement relationship but also spark a flame of curiosity in the minds of fellow researchers. After all, in the world of statistical inquiry, every "lightbulb" moment counts, no matter how surprising.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the possible correlation between kerosene consumption in Libya and the total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos, a multi-faceted approach was employed. Our research team embarked on a quest to gather and analyze data from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) and YouTube. This involved navigating through the virtual halls of internet databases, braving the currents of information, and occasionally dodging the occasional cat video distraction (a statistical hazard, no doubt). Nonetheless, the tireless pursuit of data yielded a trove of information from the years 2011 to 2021.

The initial step of the research involved navigating the labyrinthine archives of the EIA to unearth comprehensive data on kerosene consumption in Libya. The journey through these voluminous repositories felt akin to searching for a needle in a haystack, except in this case, the needle was a statistically significant data point, and the haystack was a digital expanse of energy consumption figures. It was, in essence, a quest for illumination, in more ways than one.

Simultaneously, the team delved into the YouTube platform, navigating the virtual cosmos of minutephysics videos to gather data on their total likes. This involved meticulous recording, categorization, and bafflement at the sheer variety of comments and discussions surrounding the physics-themed content. It was a bit like mining for statistical nuggets in a cave of knowledge, with occasional encounters with the statistical equivalent of a comedic gem—every research team's secret treasure.

To substantiate our findings and ensure the robustness of our analysis, a series of statistical methods were employed. The data underwent rigorous scrutiny, employing correlation analysis to unravel any potential associations between kerosene consumption and YouTube engagement. The application of these statistical tools not only shed light on the relationship between the variables but also illuminated the quirks of statistical analysis, much like a colorful LED display in a dimly lit statistical landscape.

Once the data had been meticulously compiled and enhanced with statistical wizardry, a triumphant invocation of software tools such as R or SPSS was made to conduct regression analysis. This step allowed us to unravel the nuances within the data, akin to separating the strands of statistical wool to reveal the underlying correlations. It was both an exercise in insight and, dare we say, a "data-driven" form of entertainment.

Finally, the data were subjected to a battery of reliability and validity tests. This ensured that our findings were as sturdy as an ancient lighthouse in a statistical storm, providing reassurance that our conclusions were not merely fleeting statistical mirages. As we navigated through the peaks and troughs of statistical relevance, it became apparent that our research methodology was not only robust but also rife with unexpected statistical anecdotes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Kerosene used in Libya and Total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and YouTube .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8662683, r-squared of 0.7504208, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Kerosene Connections: Illuminating the Relationship Between Libyan Fuel Use and YouTube Engagement"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we shed light on the intriguing relationship between kerosene consumption in Libya and the total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, we sought to uncover any potential connection between these seemingly disparate variables. To our delight, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8662683 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021.

Our analysis not only points to a statistically significant association between the two phenomena but also presents an opportunity for a humorous interpretation. Just as kerosene has been a source of illumination for countless households, our research suggests that it may have "fueled" the engagement with physics content on YouTube. It seems that the fascination with minutephysics videos has sparked quite the "ignition" among viewers—perhaps kerosene and kinetic energy share a "light-hearted" connection after all.

These unexpected findings not only contribute to the understanding of energy usage and online engagement but also serve as a reminder that in the world of statistical analysis, even the most seemingly unrelated elements may have a "bright" point of convergence.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The link between energy consumption and online behavior has become an area of growing interest in recent years, as researchers seek to understand the subtle and unexpected connections that underlie our modern, interconnected world. In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between kerosene usage in Libya and the total likes garnered by minutephysics YouTube videos. This investigation emerges from the desire to illuminate the potential interplay between traditional energy sources and digital engagement.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8662683 and p < 0.01, as presented in the abstract, sets the stage for a robust analysis of the relationship between kerosene consumption and YouTube viewership. It appears that the flickering flames of kerosene lamps may have kindled more than just light; they may have ignited a spark of interest in the physics-oriented content provided by minutephysics. It seems that Libyans aren't just turning on kerosene lamps—they're also turning on to physics!
On a more serious note, understanding these unexpected connections offers a unique window into the interconnectedness of human behavior and the global energy landscape. As we navigate through the labyrinth of data, it becomes clear that even seemingly unrelated variables can display a remarkable degree of correlation. It's as if statistical analysis holds the key to unlocking the hidden "epiphanies" of everyday life.
As researchers, we persist in our quest for knowledge and often stumble across unexpected and, dare I say, "illuminating" findings. The association between kerosene usage and YouTube engagement may at first glance seem as incongruous as, well, a physics problem set in the desert. However, every statistical investigation may bring an "en-lightening" moment, shedding beams of insight on the seemingly disparate elements of our world.
Our endeavor is not only to draw attention to this intriguing correlation but also to underscore the importance of keeping an open mind in the pursuit of knowledge. In the landscape of statistical inquiry, every data point represents a potential revelation, and sometimes, the most unlikely pairings may end up revealing the brightest connections.
As we embark on this journey into the labyrinth of statistical analysis and its unexpected intersections, it is our hope that this study will not only illuminate the kerosene-YouTube engagement relationship but also spark a flame of curiosity in the minds of fellow researchers. After all, in the world of statistical inquiry, every "lightbulb" moment counts, no matter how surprising.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of kerosene consumption in Libya and the total likes garnered by minutephysics YouTube videos for the period from 2011 to 2021 yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8662683, an r-squared value of 0.7504208, and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These findings suggest a strong and positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, indicating that as kerosene usage in Libya increased, so too did the total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos.

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between kerosene consumption in Libya and the total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos. As one might say, it seems that the "spark" created by kerosene usage has indeed translated into online engagement. And no, this isn't just a light-hearted joke; the statistical evidence shines a clear path toward understanding this unexpected association.

These results not only offer an intriguing insight into the intertwined nature of energy consumption and digital engagement but also provide a humorous lens through which to view this unforeseen connection. It appears that the fascination with physics content has sparked quite the "bright" interest among viewers, suggesting that kerosene may have served as more than just a source of illumination in Libyan households, but also as a catalyst for engaging with scientific content online.

In conclusion, our findings not only bring to light a novel and unexpected association but also serve as a reminder that statistical analysis has the power to illuminate the unexpected connections lurking in the most unlikely places. These results underscore the importance of approaching research with an open mind, recognizing that even the most incongruous variables may harbor an illuminating revelation, much like a well-lit kerosene lamp in the dark.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Kerosene used in Libya and Total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Kerosene Connections: Illuminating the Relationship Between Libyan Fuel Use and YouTube Engagement"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we shed light on the intriguing relationship between kerosene consumption in Libya and the total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, we sought to uncover any potential connection between these seemingly disparate variables. To our delight, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8662683 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021.

Our analysis not only points to a statistically significant association between the two phenomena but also presents an opportunity for a humorous interpretation. Just as kerosene has been a source of illumination for countless households, our research suggests that it may have "fueled" the engagement with physics content on YouTube. It seems that the fascination with minutephysics videos has sparked quite the "ignition" among viewers—perhaps kerosene and kinetic energy share a "light-hearted" connection after all.

These unexpected findings not only contribute to the understanding of energy usage and online engagement but also serve as a reminder that in the world of statistical analysis, even the most seemingly unrelated elements may have a "bright" point of convergence.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith and Doe" (2017), the authors investigate the link between kerosene consumption in Libya and its potential impact on online engagement. The study provides a comprehensive analysis of household kerosene use and its correlation with digital interactions. Meanwhile, "Jones" (2018) presents a complementary perspective, delving into the psychological factors that may influence online activity in regions where kerosene is a prevalent energy source. These initial studies lay the groundwork for our exploration into the unforeseen connection between kerosene usage and YouTube viewership.
Now, let's turn the page to "The Kerosene Chronicles" by Laura Lighter, which sheds a "bright" spotlight on the historical significance of kerosene and its cultural implications. Similarly, "Fueling the Future: Energy Dynamics in the 21st Century" by E. N. Gage delves into the broader context of energy consumption, weaving a tale of interconnectedness that extends from traditional fuel sources to the digital realm.
In a surprising twist of literary connections, "The Illuminating Adventures of Physics Phil" by Isaac Newton finds our protagonist unraveling the mysteries of physics through a series of animated adventures. While not a traditional research publication, this children's book mirrors our own pursuit of illuminating the unexpected links between kerosene and YouTube engagement. Additionally, "The Magic School Bus Explores Light" offers an educational journey that parallels our own quest to shed light on the unexplored connections between energy use and online activity.
As we peer through the lens of statistical analysis, it becomes evident that the universe is full of surprising correlations and pun-intended revelations. Just as a kerosene lamp casts a warm glow in a darkened room, our findings illuminate the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that in the world of statistical inquiry, even the most unassuming pairings can ignite a spark of insight. After all, statistical analysis is much like a well-timed dad joke—it may catch you off guard, but it leaves a lasting impression.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of kerosene consumption in Libya and the total likes garnered by minutephysics YouTube videos for the period from 2011 to 2021 yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8662683, an r-squared value of 0.7504208, and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These findings suggest a strong and positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, indicating that as kerosene usage in Libya increased, so too did the total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between kerosene consumption in Libya and the total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos. As one might say, it seems that the "spark" created by kerosene usage has indeed translated into online engagement. And no, this isn't just a light-hearted joke; the statistical evidence shines a clear path toward understanding this unexpected association.
These results not only offer an intriguing insight into the intertwined nature of energy consumption and digital engagement but also provide a humorous lens through which to view this unforeseen connection. It appears that the fascination with physics content has sparked quite the "bright" interest among viewers, suggesting that kerosene may have served as more than just a source of illumination in Libyan households, but also as a catalyst for engaging with scientific content online.
In conclusion, our findings not only bring to light a novel and unexpected association but also serve as a reminder that statistical analysis has the power to illuminate the unexpected connections lurking in the most unlikely places. These results underscore the importance of approaching research with an open mind, recognizing that even the most incongruous variables may harbor an illuminating revelation, much like a well-lit kerosene lamp in the dark.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study present compelling evidence supporting the unexpected link between kerosene consumption in Libya and the total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos. Our findings, which revealed a statistically significant correlation between these seemingly disparate variables, align closely with the prior research by Smith and Doe (2017) and Jones (2018). The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8662683 and a p-value of less than 0.01 underscore the strength of the relationship, reflecting a remarkable association that may have been previously overlooked.

Much like a well-timed dad joke, these results caught us off guard but left a lasting impression. The "spark" of engagement observed in minutephysics YouTube videos appears to be intricately connected to the use of kerosene in Libyan households. As such, the link between kerosene and online activity seems to transcend the boundaries of energy consumption, shedding light on the unexpected intersections between traditional fuel sources and digital engagement.

In a similar vein, the literary works discussed in the literature review, particularly "The Illuminating Adventures of Physics Phil" by Isaac Newton and "The Magic School Bus Explores Light," may have inadvertently laid the groundwork for our own exploration into the illuminating connection between kerosene and YouTube engagement. These unexpected parallels serve as a poignant reminder that even the most unconventional sources of inspiration can lead to enlightening discoveries.

The unexpectedly high correlation observed in this study not only supports the initial findings of prior research but also emphasizes the pervasive influence of kerosene on online engagement. It seems that, akin to a lighthearted dad joke, the unforeseen connection between these variables may have been hiding in plain sight, awaiting illumination through rigorous statistical analysis.

Furthermore, the use of kerosene as a source of lighting in Libyan households may not only have contributed to physical illumination but also metaphorically fueled the curiosity and interest in physics content, leading to increased engagement with minutephysics videos. This delightfully unexpected association emphasizes the far-reaching impact of energy usage on digital interactions, unravelling a tale that is as statistically significant as it is unexpectedly amusing.

As we navigate through the intricate web of statistical analysis, the findings of this study highlight the importance of approaching seemingly unrelated variables with an open mind, recognizing that amidst the data, there may lie an unexpected connection waiting to be illuminated. Just as a well-lit kerosene lamp dispels darkness, statistical analysis has the power to unearth surprising correlations, leaving a glow of insight in its wake, much like a perfectly timed dad joke.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Kerosene used in Libya and Total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Kerosene Connections: Illuminating the Relationship Between Libyan Fuel Use and YouTube Engagement"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we shed light on the intriguing relationship between kerosene consumption in Libya and the total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, we sought to uncover any potential connection between these seemingly disparate variables. To our delight, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8662683 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021.

Our analysis not only points to a statistically significant association between the two phenomena but also presents an opportunity for a humorous interpretation. Just as kerosene has been a source of illumination for countless households, our research suggests that it may have "fueled" the engagement with physics content on YouTube. It seems that the fascination with minutephysics videos has sparked quite the "ignition" among viewers—perhaps kerosene and kinetic energy share a "light-hearted" connection after all.

These unexpected findings not only contribute to the understanding of energy usage and online engagement but also serve as a reminder that in the world of statistical analysis, even the most seemingly unrelated elements may have a "bright" point of convergence.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The link between energy consumption and online behavior has become an area of growing interest in recent years, as researchers seek to understand the subtle and unexpected connections that underlie our modern, interconnected world. In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between kerosene usage in Libya and the total likes garnered by minutephysics YouTube videos. This investigation emerges from the desire to illuminate the potential interplay between traditional energy sources and digital engagement.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8662683 and p < 0.01, as presented in the abstract, sets the stage for a robust analysis of the relationship between kerosene consumption and YouTube viewership. It appears that the flickering flames of kerosene lamps may have kindled more than just light; they may have ignited a spark of interest in the physics-oriented content provided by minutephysics. It seems that Libyans aren't just turning on kerosene lamps—they're also turning on to physics!
On a more serious note, understanding these unexpected connections offers a unique window into the interconnectedness of human behavior and the global energy landscape. As we navigate through the labyrinth of data, it becomes clear that even seemingly unrelated variables can display a remarkable degree of correlation. It's as if statistical analysis holds the key to unlocking the hidden "epiphanies" of everyday life.
As researchers, we persist in our quest for knowledge and often stumble across unexpected and, dare I say, "illuminating" findings. The association between kerosene usage and YouTube engagement may at first glance seem as incongruous as, well, a physics problem set in the desert. However, every statistical investigation may bring an "en-lightening" moment, shedding beams of insight on the seemingly disparate elements of our world.
Our endeavor is not only to draw attention to this intriguing correlation but also to underscore the importance of keeping an open mind in the pursuit of knowledge. In the landscape of statistical inquiry, every data point represents a potential revelation, and sometimes, the most unlikely pairings may end up revealing the brightest connections.
As we embark on this journey into the labyrinth of statistical analysis and its unexpected intersections, it is our hope that this study will not only illuminate the kerosene-YouTube engagement relationship but also spark a flame of curiosity in the minds of fellow researchers. After all, in the world of statistical inquiry, every "lightbulb" moment counts, no matter how surprising.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of kerosene consumption in Libya and the total likes garnered by minutephysics YouTube videos for the period from 2011 to 2021 yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8662683, an r-squared value of 0.7504208, and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These findings suggest a strong and positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, indicating that as kerosene usage in Libya increased, so too did the total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between kerosene consumption in Libya and the total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos. As one might say, it seems that the "spark" created by kerosene usage has indeed translated into online engagement. And no, this isn't just a light-hearted joke; the statistical evidence shines a clear path toward understanding this unexpected association.
These results not only offer an intriguing insight into the intertwined nature of energy consumption and digital engagement but also provide a humorous lens through which to view this unforeseen connection. It appears that the fascination with physics content has sparked quite the "bright" interest among viewers, suggesting that kerosene may have served as more than just a source of illumination in Libyan households, but also as a catalyst for engaging with scientific content online.
In conclusion, our findings not only bring to light a novel and unexpected association but also serve as a reminder that statistical analysis has the power to illuminate the unexpected connections lurking in the most unlikely places. These results underscore the importance of approaching research with an open mind, recognizing that even the most incongruous variables may harbor an illuminating revelation, much like a well-lit kerosene lamp in the dark.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has brightly illuminated the surprising connection between kerosene consumption in Libya and the total likes garnered by minutephysics YouTube videos. The significant correlation coefficient of 0.8662683 and p < 0.01 not only underscores the statistical robustness of this relationship but also kindles a sense of wonder at the unforeseen links that permeate our interconnected world.

Our findings suggest that just as kerosene has been a source of illumination for countless households, it may have also "ignited" the engagement with physics content on YouTube. It seems that the fascination with minutephysics videos has sparked quite the "ignition" among viewers—proof that even in the world of statistical analysis, humor can shed a "bright" light on unexpected discoveries.

As we wrap up this research, we can't resist adding a little "dad joke" into the mix: Did you hear about the mathematician who's afraid of negative numbers? He will stop at nothing to avoid them. In a similar vein, we've certainly made positive strides in shedding light on this curious correlation between kerosene usage and YouTube engagement.

However, it is important to note that no further research is needed in this area. The high correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value leave little room for doubt. This relationship is as clear as day, or should I say, illuminated as a well-lit kerosene lamp in the dark.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Kerosene Connections: Illuminating the Relationship Between Libyan Fuel Use and YouTube Engagement. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Energy Sociology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Kerosene Connections: Illuminating the Relationship Between Libyan Fuel Use and YouTube Engagement. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Institute for Energy Efficiency Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Kerosene Connections: Illuminating the Relationship Between Libyan Fuel Use and YouTube Engagement with an abstract of In this study, we shed light on the intriguing relationship between kerosene consumption in Libya and the total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, we sought to uncover any potential connection between these seemingly disparate variables. To our delight, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8662683 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021.
Our analysis not only points to a statistically significant association between the two phenomena but also presents an opportunity for a humorous interpretation. Just as kerosene has been a source of illumination for countless households, our research suggests that it may have "fueled" the engagement with physics content on YouTube. It seems that the fascination with minutephysics videos has sparked quite the "ignition" among viewers—perhaps kerosene and kinetic energy share a "light-hearted" connection after all.
These unexpected findings not only contribute to the understanding of energy usage and online engagement but also serve as a reminder that in the world of statistical analysis, even the most seemingly unrelated elements may have a "bright" point of convergence.

ChatGPT:

kerosene consumption, Libya, YouTube engagement, minutephysics, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, energy usage, online engagement, kinetic energy, household fuel use

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Kerosene used in Libya
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Libya in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Libya

Total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.8662683 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7504208 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 75% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Kerosene used in Libya) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00056. 0.0005625586461300938000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 0.056% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,778 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.55, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Kerosene used in Libya (Million Barrels/Day)2865332.802662.389862.020521.477371.47737
Total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos (Total likes)51164018505001286710116072076387210779801345310582915908395401480563356




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2,8,6,5,3,3,2.80266,2.38986,2.02052,1.47737,1.47737,])
array_2 = np.array([511640,1850500,1286710,1160720,763872,1077980,1345310,582915,908395,401480,563356,])
array_1_name = "Kerosene used in Libya"
array_2_name = "Total likes of minutephysics YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 5279 · Black Variable ID: 24637 · Red Variable ID: 25525
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0