about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,177 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma and the second variable is Internet Access Rate among US Citizens.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Every time someone voted Republican in Oklahoma, a tiny bit of extra internet access magic was conjured up for the entire nation. It's like a conservative wave of connectivity spreading across the land, turning every dial-up into high-speed and bringing WiFi to the most unexpected places. Who knew political preferences could have such electric consequences! So, keep on casting those votes, Oklahoma, because apparently, you hold the key to keeping the internet running nationwide!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a low poly Oklahoma landscape with vibrant colors where beams of light representing internet access surge across the nation every time a vote for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma is cast. The landscape should be scattered with various devices and gadgets, from rural areas to city centers, all humming with newfound connectivity created by each vote. As more votes pour in, the internet access magic swells, creating a dynamic web of connectivity that stretches from Oklahoma and reaches every corner of the country, enhancing the digital landscape for all. The image should use simple shapes and vivid colors to convey a sense of energy and connectivity. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma and Internet Access Rate among US Citizens. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Macabre Low poly Photorealism Art nouveau Oragami
ChatGPT: Low poly

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma and Internet Access Rate among US Citizens, in the following situation: Every time someone voted Republican in Oklahoma, a tiny bit of extra internet access magic was conjured up for the entire nation. It's like a conservative wave of connectivity spreading across the land, turning every dial-up into high-speed and bringing WiFi to the most unexpected places. Who knew political preferences could have such electric consequences! So, keep on casting those votes, Oklahoma, because apparently, you hold the key to keeping the internet running nationwide!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a colorful, energetic Oklahoma landscape, radiant beams of light representing internet access surge across the nation every time a vote for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma is cast. The landscape is dotted with various devices and gadgets, from rural areas to city centers, all humming with the newfound connectivity created by each vote. As more votes pour in, the internet access magic swells, creating a dynamic web of connectivity that stretches from Oklahoma and reaches every corner of the country, enhancing the digital landscape for all.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Low poly ] and depicting this scene: In a colorful, energetic Oklahoma landscape, radiant beams of light representing internet access surge across the nation every time a vote for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma is cast. The landscape is dotted with various devices and gadgets, from rural areas to city centers, all humming with the newfound connectivity created by each vote. As more votes pour in, the internet access magic swells, creating a dynamic web of connectivity that stretches from Oklahoma and reaches every corner of the country, enhancing the digital landscape for all. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a low poly Oklahoma landscape with vibrant colors where beams of light representing internet access surge across the nation every time a vote for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma is cast. The landscape should be scattered with various devices and gadgets, from rural areas to city centers, all humming with newfound connectivity created by each vote. As more votes pour in, the internet access magic swells, creating a dynamic web of connectivity that stretches from Oklahoma and reaches every corner of the country, enhancing the digital landscape for all. The image should use simple shapes and vivid colors to convey a sense of energy and connectivity.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma caused Internet Access Rate among US Citizens to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Red State Republicans: Relationship between Votes and Virtual Voyages

Journal of Political Geography and Virtual Reality

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma and Internet Access Rate among US Citizens. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9710951 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Red State Republicans: Relationship between Votes and Virtual Voyages

[[ABSTRACT]]
The influence of digital connectivity on political preferences has been a topic of growing interest within the field of electoral research. In our study, we examined the connection between the percentage of votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oklahoma and the internet access rate among US citizens. Through a thorough analysis of extensive data sets sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Statista, we set out to unpack this complex correlation.

Our findings revealed a remarkably robust positive correlation between Republican votes in the Sooner State and internet access rates, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9710951 exhibiting a staggering association. P < 0.01 indicated the statistical significance of this link, prompting us to delve further into the humorous yet perplexing question: Are red waves riding on digital wavelengths?

Uncovering this connection took us down a path paved with data analytics and dad jokes, leaving us to ponder whether internet memes could be more influential than we ever imagined. Our study not only sheds light on the interplay between conservative voting patterns and online connectivity but also underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of the modern intersection between politics and the digital realm.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma and Internet Access Rate among US Citizens. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Red State Republicans: Relationship between Votes and Virtual Voyages

[[ABSTRACT]]
The influence of digital connectivity on political preferences has been a topic of growing interest within the field of electoral research. In our study, we examined the connection between the percentage of votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oklahoma and the internet access rate among US citizens. Through a thorough analysis of extensive data sets sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Statista, we set out to unpack this complex correlation.

Our findings revealed a remarkably robust positive correlation between Republican votes in the Sooner State and internet access rates, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9710951 exhibiting a staggering association. P < 0.01 indicated the statistical significance of this link, prompting us to delve further into the humorous yet perplexing question: Are red waves riding on digital wavelengths?

Uncovering this connection took us down a path paved with data analytics and dad jokes, leaving us to ponder whether internet memes could be more influential than we ever imagined. Our study not only sheds light on the interplay between conservative voting patterns and online connectivity but also underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of the modern intersection between politics and the digital realm.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As our society becomes increasingly digitized, the ways in which individuals interact with technology have become an integral part of understanding their behaviors and preferences, including in the realm of politics. In this light, our research has set off on a curious quest to explore the relationship between the percentage of votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of Oklahoma and the internet access rate among US citizens.

Diving into the ocean of data, we discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation between Republican votes in the Sooner State and internet access rates. Perhaps it's no surprise that in the Sooner State, the faster the internet, the more fervent the support for the red team. I suppose you could say it's a case of "Don't fence me in; give me high-speed internet!"

This peculiar link raises the intriguing question: Is there a red tide surging on the waves of digital connectivity? It seems that in Oklahoma, the virtual world and the political sphere are more entwined than one might expect. One might even joke that they're experiencing a "broadbandwagon effect"!

The statistical significance of this correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9710951 and a p-value of less than 0.01, propelled us into the depths of this captivating connection. As we navigated through the data, we couldn't help but wonder if the age-old adage "you can't believe everything you read online" might need an update to include "except for political predictions in Oklahoma, apparently."

Our study seeks to not only unravel this enigmatic correlation but also shine a light on the often-overlooked influence of online connectivity on political inclinations. Could it be that the digital realm is contributing to shaping the "red state" narrative in more ways than one? It seems that in the age of online discourse, the phrase "surfing the web" might take on a whole new meaning, particularly in the context of electoral patterns.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma and Internet Access Rate among US Citizens. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Red State Republicans: Relationship between Votes and Virtual Voyages

[[ABSTRACT]]
The influence of digital connectivity on political preferences has been a topic of growing interest within the field of electoral research. In our study, we examined the connection between the percentage of votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oklahoma and the internet access rate among US citizens. Through a thorough analysis of extensive data sets sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Statista, we set out to unpack this complex correlation.

Our findings revealed a remarkably robust positive correlation between Republican votes in the Sooner State and internet access rates, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9710951 exhibiting a staggering association. P < 0.01 indicated the statistical significance of this link, prompting us to delve further into the humorous yet perplexing question: Are red waves riding on digital wavelengths?

Uncovering this connection took us down a path paved with data analytics and dad jokes, leaving us to ponder whether internet memes could be more influential than we ever imagined. Our study not only sheds light on the interplay between conservative voting patterns and online connectivity but also underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of the modern intersection between politics and the digital realm.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As our society becomes increasingly digitized, the ways in which individuals interact with technology have become an integral part of understanding their behaviors and preferences, including in the realm of politics. In this light, our research has set off on a curious quest to explore the relationship between the percentage of votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of Oklahoma and the internet access rate among US citizens.
Diving into the ocean of data, we discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation between Republican votes in the Sooner State and internet access rates. Perhaps it's no surprise that in the Sooner State, the faster the internet, the more fervent the support for the red team. I suppose you could say it's a case of "Don't fence me in; give me high-speed internet!"
This peculiar link raises the intriguing question: Is there a red tide surging on the waves of digital connectivity? It seems that in Oklahoma, the virtual world and the political sphere are more entwined than one might expect. One might even joke that they're experiencing a "broadbandwagon effect"!
The statistical significance of this correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9710951 and a p-value of less than 0.01, propelled us into the depths of this captivating connection. As we navigated through the data, we couldn't help but wonder if the age-old adage "you can't believe everything you read online" might need an update to include "except for political predictions in Oklahoma, apparently."
Our study seeks to not only unravel this enigmatic correlation but also shine a light on the often-overlooked influence of online connectivity on political inclinations. Could it be that the digital realm is contributing to shaping the "red state" narrative in more ways than one? It seems that in the age of online discourse, the phrase "surfing the web" might take on a whole new meaning, particularly in the context of electoral patterns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their study, Smith and Doe (2020) examined the correlation between political voting patterns and technological infrastructure, revealing a compelling association between the percentage of votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oklahoma and the internet access rate among US citizens. Their findings echoed the results of Jones et al. (2019), who delved into the digital landscape of electoral preferences and discovered a noteworthy link between conservative votes and online connectivity. These serious scholars paved the way for our own investigation into this curious correlation, leading us to wonder if political chatter travels faster than fiber optics in cyberspace.

Venturing beyond the realm of academia, we find that real-world accounts in non-fiction books such as "The Age of Surveillance Capitalism" by Shoshana Zuboff and "The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains" by Nicholas Carr offer valuable insights into the complex interplay between technology and societal dynamics. These books push us to ponder the repercussions of a society where political leanings are just a Wi-Fi signal away – perhaps we are witnessing a new age of "e-politics" where pixels and policies collide in the digital arena.

On the fictional front, literary works such as "Snow Crash" by Neal Stephenson and "Ready Player One" by Ernest Cline transport readers to virtual worlds, where the boundaries between reality and the internet blur. As we navigate through these narratives, we find ourselves contemplating whether political affiliations could extend beyond physical borders, resonating through the fiber-optic cables that thread our global village. It's almost as if we're caught in a matrix of political data, where every click and scroll shapes the digital tapestry of democracy.

In the realm of internet culture, memes such as the "This is Fine" dog and "Hide the Pain Harold" humorously embody the juxtaposition of online experiences and political realities. These memes, with their tongue-in-cheek commentary on navigating through tumultuous situations, prompt us to consider whether the digital landscape not only reflects but also influences our political perspectives. After all, in the age of viral content, one might joke that political debates are now just a matter of who can come up with the wittiest meme – and in the case of Oklahoma, perhaps a "red wave" of memes is riding alongside the red votes!

As we wade through this sea of literature and internet pop culture, it becomes evident that the link between Republican votes in Oklahoma and internet access rates is a subject that not only piques our academic curiosity but also sets the stage for a whirlwind of thought-provoking puns and unforeseen connections. Stay connected as we unravel the mystery of whether conservative votes are truly surfing the digital waves - and whether a strong Wi-Fi signal might just be the key to winning hearts and ballots.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma and Internet Access Rate among US Citizens. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Statista . You used data from 2000 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Red State Republicans: Relationship between Votes and Virtual Voyages

[[ABSTRACT]]
The influence of digital connectivity on political preferences has been a topic of growing interest within the field of electoral research. In our study, we examined the connection between the percentage of votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oklahoma and the internet access rate among US citizens. Through a thorough analysis of extensive data sets sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Statista, we set out to unpack this complex correlation.

Our findings revealed a remarkably robust positive correlation between Republican votes in the Sooner State and internet access rates, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9710951 exhibiting a staggering association. P < 0.01 indicated the statistical significance of this link, prompting us to delve further into the humorous yet perplexing question: Are red waves riding on digital wavelengths?

Uncovering this connection took us down a path paved with data analytics and dad jokes, leaving us to ponder whether internet memes could be more influential than we ever imagined. Our study not only sheds light on the interplay between conservative voting patterns and online connectivity but also underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of the modern intersection between politics and the digital realm.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As our society becomes increasingly digitized, the ways in which individuals interact with technology have become an integral part of understanding their behaviors and preferences, including in the realm of politics. In this light, our research has set off on a curious quest to explore the relationship between the percentage of votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of Oklahoma and the internet access rate among US citizens.
Diving into the ocean of data, we discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation between Republican votes in the Sooner State and internet access rates. Perhaps it's no surprise that in the Sooner State, the faster the internet, the more fervent the support for the red team. I suppose you could say it's a case of "Don't fence me in; give me high-speed internet!"
This peculiar link raises the intriguing question: Is there a red tide surging on the waves of digital connectivity? It seems that in Oklahoma, the virtual world and the political sphere are more entwined than one might expect. One might even joke that they're experiencing a "broadbandwagon effect"!
The statistical significance of this correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9710951 and a p-value of less than 0.01, propelled us into the depths of this captivating connection. As we navigated through the data, we couldn't help but wonder if the age-old adage "you can't believe everything you read online" might need an update to include "except for political predictions in Oklahoma, apparently."
Our study seeks to not only unravel this enigmatic correlation but also shine a light on the often-overlooked influence of online connectivity on political inclinations. Could it be that the digital realm is contributing to shaping the "red state" narrative in more ways than one? It seems that in the age of online discourse, the phrase "surfing the web" might take on a whole new meaning, particularly in the context of electoral patterns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To begin our investigation, we assembled a comprehensive dataset spanning the years 2000 to 2020, drawing from reputable sources such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Statista. We rigorously curated information on the percentage of votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oklahoma, juxtaposing it with the internet access rate among US citizens across different states. Our data had us feeling like digital detectives, uncovering clues in cyberspace that would make even Sherlock Holmes proud.

Next, we employed a multifaceted approach of statistical analysis to probe the relationship between these two disparate yet strangely interconnected variables. We utilized regression models and data visualization techniques, immersing ourselves in a sea of scatter plots and line charts that would make any statistician seasick. It's almost as if we were trying to untangle a web of data to reveal the hidden patterns beneath, much like untangling a fishing line—but with way more spreadsheets.

In addition to the quantitative analysis, we conducted qualitative assessments through surveys, interviews, and focus groups to delve deeper into the lived experiences and perspectives of individuals within the digital landscape. We quizzed participants about their online activities, political leanings, and favorite memes, leading to some unexpected insights that made us realize that internet culture and political allegiance are sometimes closer than you might think. It's like trying to figure out what came first, the chicken or the political tweet.

Furthermore, to account for potential confounding factors such as demographics, socioeconomic status, and technological infrastructure, we meticulously controlled for these variables in our analysis using sophisticated statistical techniques. It's a bit like making a complex recipe where you have to ensure that you've included just the right amount of each ingredient, in this case, a pinch of income disparity and a dash of technological advancement.

Finally, we sought to validate our findings through an artful dance of sensitivity analyses and cross-validation methods, ensuring that our results were robust and not merely a mirage in the digital desert. It's a bit like double-checking your GPS when you're on a road trip in the desert—nobody wants to end up in a statistical cul-de-sac.

In navigating this maze of methodological choices, we proceeded with caution, weaving together a tapestry of quantitative and qualitative approaches to unravel the captivating connection between red state Republican votes and digital voyages. Our journey through this unconventional terrain has not only brought forth scholarly revelations but also a newfound appreciation for the unforeseen intersections of data analysis, political patterns, and the occasional dad joke.

In the words of our statistical compass: "May your data always be significant, and your p-values forever small. And if all else fails, just blame it on the algorithm!"

Our methodology reflects a fusion of sophisticated statistical techniques, an unyielding commitment to comprehensive data curation, and a touch of humor to keep the journey enjoyable.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma and Internet Access Rate among US Citizens. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Statista .

For the time period 2000 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9710951, r-squared of 0.9430257, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Red State Republicans: Relationship between Votes and Virtual Voyages

[[ABSTRACT]]
The influence of digital connectivity on political preferences has been a topic of growing interest within the field of electoral research. In our study, we examined the connection between the percentage of votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oklahoma and the internet access rate among US citizens. Through a thorough analysis of extensive data sets sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Statista, we set out to unpack this complex correlation.

Our findings revealed a remarkably robust positive correlation between Republican votes in the Sooner State and internet access rates, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9710951 exhibiting a staggering association. P < 0.01 indicated the statistical significance of this link, prompting us to delve further into the humorous yet perplexing question: Are red waves riding on digital wavelengths?

Uncovering this connection took us down a path paved with data analytics and dad jokes, leaving us to ponder whether internet memes could be more influential than we ever imagined. Our study not only sheds light on the interplay between conservative voting patterns and online connectivity but also underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of the modern intersection between politics and the digital realm.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As our society becomes increasingly digitized, the ways in which individuals interact with technology have become an integral part of understanding their behaviors and preferences, including in the realm of politics. In this light, our research has set off on a curious quest to explore the relationship between the percentage of votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of Oklahoma and the internet access rate among US citizens.
Diving into the ocean of data, we discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation between Republican votes in the Sooner State and internet access rates. Perhaps it's no surprise that in the Sooner State, the faster the internet, the more fervent the support for the red team. I suppose you could say it's a case of "Don't fence me in; give me high-speed internet!"
This peculiar link raises the intriguing question: Is there a red tide surging on the waves of digital connectivity? It seems that in Oklahoma, the virtual world and the political sphere are more entwined than one might expect. One might even joke that they're experiencing a "broadbandwagon effect"!
The statistical significance of this correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9710951 and a p-value of less than 0.01, propelled us into the depths of this captivating connection. As we navigated through the data, we couldn't help but wonder if the age-old adage "you can't believe everything you read online" might need an update to include "except for political predictions in Oklahoma, apparently."
Our study seeks to not only unravel this enigmatic correlation but also shine a light on the often-overlooked influence of online connectivity on political inclinations. Could it be that the digital realm is contributing to shaping the "red state" narrative in more ways than one? It seems that in the age of online discourse, the phrase "surfing the web" might take on a whole new meaning, particularly in the context of electoral patterns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data spanning the years 2000 to 2020 brought to light a robust positive correlation between the percentage of votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oklahoma and the internet access rate among US citizens. The correlation coefficient of 0.9710951 indicates a strikingly strong association, suggesting that high-speed internet and conservative votes go together like peas and carrots. It's as if Oklahomans are saying, "Give me liberty and give me internet!"

The r-squared value of 0.9430257 further exemplifies the tight relationship between the two variables, as if they were locked in a digital embrace. This significant relationship (p < 0.01) prompts us to consider the intriguing notion that the virtual world and political preferences are more intertwined than previously imagined. You might say it's a case of "you can take the voter out of Oklahoma, but you can't take the WiFi out of the voter."

Further highlighting this correlation is the scatterplot presented in Fig. 1, which vividly illustrates the compelling connection between Republican votes in Oklahoma and internet access rates. The scattered data points form a pattern resembling an intricate digital tapestry, weaving a story of online connectivity and conservative support. It seems that in the world of Oklahoman politics, the phrase "surfing the web" takes on a whole new meaning.

Our research offers valuable insights into the intersection of technology and political beliefs, indicating the need for a more nuanced understanding of the factors shaping modern electoral outcomes. As we unpack this peculiar partnership between virtual voyages and political preferences, it becomes clear that the internet may hold more sway over the ballot box than meets the eye. After all, in the digital age, it appears that "clicking" with voters takes on a whole new significance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma and Internet Access Rate among US Citizens. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Red State Republicans: Relationship between Votes and Virtual Voyages

[[ABSTRACT]]
The influence of digital connectivity on political preferences has been a topic of growing interest within the field of electoral research. In our study, we examined the connection between the percentage of votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oklahoma and the internet access rate among US citizens. Through a thorough analysis of extensive data sets sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Statista, we set out to unpack this complex correlation.

Our findings revealed a remarkably robust positive correlation between Republican votes in the Sooner State and internet access rates, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9710951 exhibiting a staggering association. P < 0.01 indicated the statistical significance of this link, prompting us to delve further into the humorous yet perplexing question: Are red waves riding on digital wavelengths?

Uncovering this connection took us down a path paved with data analytics and dad jokes, leaving us to ponder whether internet memes could be more influential than we ever imagined. Our study not only sheds light on the interplay between conservative voting patterns and online connectivity but also underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of the modern intersection between politics and the digital realm.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study, Smith and Doe (2020) examined the correlation between political voting patterns and technological infrastructure, revealing a compelling association between the percentage of votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oklahoma and the internet access rate among US citizens. Their findings echoed the results of Jones et al. (2019), who delved into the digital landscape of electoral preferences and discovered a noteworthy link between conservative votes and online connectivity. These serious scholars paved the way for our own investigation into this curious correlation, leading us to wonder if political chatter travels faster than fiber optics in cyberspace.
Venturing beyond the realm of academia, we find that real-world accounts in non-fiction books such as "The Age of Surveillance Capitalism" by Shoshana Zuboff and "The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains" by Nicholas Carr offer valuable insights into the complex interplay between technology and societal dynamics. These books push us to ponder the repercussions of a society where political leanings are just a Wi-Fi signal away – perhaps we are witnessing a new age of "e-politics" where pixels and policies collide in the digital arena.
On the fictional front, literary works such as "Snow Crash" by Neal Stephenson and "Ready Player One" by Ernest Cline transport readers to virtual worlds, where the boundaries between reality and the internet blur. As we navigate through these narratives, we find ourselves contemplating whether political affiliations could extend beyond physical borders, resonating through the fiber-optic cables that thread our global village. It's almost as if we're caught in a matrix of political data, where every click and scroll shapes the digital tapestry of democracy.
In the realm of internet culture, memes such as the "This is Fine" dog and "Hide the Pain Harold" humorously embody the juxtaposition of online experiences and political realities. These memes, with their tongue-in-cheek commentary on navigating through tumultuous situations, prompt us to consider whether the digital landscape not only reflects but also influences our political perspectives. After all, in the age of viral content, one might joke that political debates are now just a matter of who can come up with the wittiest meme – and in the case of Oklahoma, perhaps a "red wave" of memes is riding alongside the red votes!
As we wade through this sea of literature and internet pop culture, it becomes evident that the link between Republican votes in Oklahoma and internet access rates is a subject that not only piques our academic curiosity but also sets the stage for a whirlwind of thought-provoking puns and unforeseen connections. Stay connected as we unravel the mystery of whether conservative votes are truly surfing the digital waves - and whether a strong Wi-Fi signal might just be the key to winning hearts and ballots.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data spanning the years 2000 to 2020 brought to light a robust positive correlation between the percentage of votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oklahoma and the internet access rate among US citizens. The correlation coefficient of 0.9710951 indicates a strikingly strong association, suggesting that high-speed internet and conservative votes go together like peas and carrots. It's as if Oklahomans are saying, "Give me liberty and give me internet!"
The r-squared value of 0.9430257 further exemplifies the tight relationship between the two variables, as if they were locked in a digital embrace. This significant relationship (p < 0.01) prompts us to consider the intriguing notion that the virtual world and political preferences are more intertwined than previously imagined. You might say it's a case of "you can take the voter out of Oklahoma, but you can't take the WiFi out of the voter."
Further highlighting this correlation is the scatterplot presented in Fig. 1, which vividly illustrates the compelling connection between Republican votes in Oklahoma and internet access rates. The scattered data points form a pattern resembling an intricate digital tapestry, weaving a story of online connectivity and conservative support. It seems that in the world of Oklahoman politics, the phrase "surfing the web" takes on a whole new meaning.
Our research offers valuable insights into the intersection of technology and political beliefs, indicating the need for a more nuanced understanding of the factors shaping modern electoral outcomes. As we unpack this peculiar partnership between virtual voyages and political preferences, it becomes clear that the internet may hold more sway over the ballot box than meets the eye. After all, in the digital age, it appears that "clicking" with voters takes on a whole new significance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The correlation uncovered in our study between Republican votes in Oklahoma and internet access rates among US citizens is a finding that not only reaffirms previous research but also invites a myriad of intriguing interpretations. The robust positive correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9710951 and a tight relationship indicated by an r-squared value of 0.9430257, underlines the significance of digital connectivity in shaping political preferences. It seems that Oklahomans are not only passionate about their politics but also about their Wi-Fi connections – they’re truly wired for conservative support.

The humorous interjections and puns in the literature review may be more illuminating than anticipated, as they prompt us to consider whether internet culture and political landscapes are not only mirrors but also influencers of one another. Perhaps the "age of viral content" is not just a jest but a profound truth, where a well-crafted meme might sway opinions and, ultimately, votes. It’s as if the internet has become the modern-day soapbox, where political discourse unfolds amidst a sea of digital cat videos and impassioned debates.

The scatterplot, resembling an intricate digital tapestry, vividly portrays this compelling connection. It’s almost as if the internet is weaving a narrative of conservative support, one data point at a time – a digital symphony reverberating with political resonance. We find ourselves musing over the idea that the virtual world and political preferences are not just intersecting but entwining in unforeseen ways, echoing the sentiment that perhaps the future of governance lies in the virtual ether.

With this realization, the need for a nuanced understanding of the modern intersection between politics and the digital realm becomes even more pressing. The internet is a force to be reckoned with in the political arena, and our findings underscore the need for further exploration of its impact on electoral outcomes. It seems that in the digital age, figuring out how to ‘click’ with voters holds a whole new significance – or should we say, getting that viral vote of confidence.

The crux of this study may lie in the fact that internet access rates and political voting patterns are more intertwined than previously thought, prompting us to consider whether it’s not just information but also memes that want to be free. As we ponder the implications of our findings, one thing is clear: the ride on the ‘red waves’ of Oklahoma might just be a virtual one after all – a journey through the fiber-optic cables and digital realms, immortalized by data and dad jokes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma and Internet Access Rate among US Citizens. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Red State Republicans: Relationship between Votes and Virtual Voyages

[[ABSTRACT]]
The influence of digital connectivity on political preferences has been a topic of growing interest within the field of electoral research. In our study, we examined the connection between the percentage of votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oklahoma and the internet access rate among US citizens. Through a thorough analysis of extensive data sets sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Statista, we set out to unpack this complex correlation.

Our findings revealed a remarkably robust positive correlation between Republican votes in the Sooner State and internet access rates, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9710951 exhibiting a staggering association. P < 0.01 indicated the statistical significance of this link, prompting us to delve further into the humorous yet perplexing question: Are red waves riding on digital wavelengths?

Uncovering this connection took us down a path paved with data analytics and dad jokes, leaving us to ponder whether internet memes could be more influential than we ever imagined. Our study not only sheds light on the interplay between conservative voting patterns and online connectivity but also underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of the modern intersection between politics and the digital realm.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As our society becomes increasingly digitized, the ways in which individuals interact with technology have become an integral part of understanding their behaviors and preferences, including in the realm of politics. In this light, our research has set off on a curious quest to explore the relationship between the percentage of votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of Oklahoma and the internet access rate among US citizens.
Diving into the ocean of data, we discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation between Republican votes in the Sooner State and internet access rates. Perhaps it's no surprise that in the Sooner State, the faster the internet, the more fervent the support for the red team. I suppose you could say it's a case of "Don't fence me in; give me high-speed internet!"
This peculiar link raises the intriguing question: Is there a red tide surging on the waves of digital connectivity? It seems that in Oklahoma, the virtual world and the political sphere are more entwined than one might expect. One might even joke that they're experiencing a "broadbandwagon effect"!
The statistical significance of this correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9710951 and a p-value of less than 0.01, propelled us into the depths of this captivating connection. As we navigated through the data, we couldn't help but wonder if the age-old adage "you can't believe everything you read online" might need an update to include "except for political predictions in Oklahoma, apparently."
Our study seeks to not only unravel this enigmatic correlation but also shine a light on the often-overlooked influence of online connectivity on political inclinations. Could it be that the digital realm is contributing to shaping the "red state" narrative in more ways than one? It seems that in the age of online discourse, the phrase "surfing the web" might take on a whole new meaning, particularly in the context of electoral patterns.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data spanning the years 2000 to 2020 brought to light a robust positive correlation between the percentage of votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oklahoma and the internet access rate among US citizens. The correlation coefficient of 0.9710951 indicates a strikingly strong association, suggesting that high-speed internet and conservative votes go together like peas and carrots. It's as if Oklahomans are saying, "Give me liberty and give me internet!"
The r-squared value of 0.9430257 further exemplifies the tight relationship between the two variables, as if they were locked in a digital embrace. This significant relationship (p < 0.01) prompts us to consider the intriguing notion that the virtual world and political preferences are more intertwined than previously imagined. You might say it's a case of "you can take the voter out of Oklahoma, but you can't take the WiFi out of the voter."
Further highlighting this correlation is the scatterplot presented in Fig. 1, which vividly illustrates the compelling connection between Republican votes in Oklahoma and internet access rates. The scattered data points form a pattern resembling an intricate digital tapestry, weaving a story of online connectivity and conservative support. It seems that in the world of Oklahoman politics, the phrase "surfing the web" takes on a whole new meaning.
Our research offers valuable insights into the intersection of technology and political beliefs, indicating the need for a more nuanced understanding of the factors shaping modern electoral outcomes. As we unpack this peculiar partnership between virtual voyages and political preferences, it becomes clear that the internet may hold more sway over the ballot box than meets the eye. After all, in the digital age, it appears that "clicking" with voters takes on a whole new significance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has illuminated an undeniable link between Republican votes in Oklahoma and internet access rates among US citizens, demonstrating a digital embrace that seems more galactic than just state-specific. It appears that in the vast cyberspace, conservative preferences have found a virtual sanctuary, a phenomenon we humorously dub as the "GOP-ter space."

The strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9710951 confirms that in the Sooner State, the digital highway intersects with the political crossroads with resounding influence. This correlation is so strong; it's as if Oklahoma voters are exclaiming, "This internet speed is faster than my political convictions!"

The integration of technology and political inclinations has never been as evidently intertwined as in our findings, prompting us to jest that Oklahomans are proclaiming, "Don't fence me in; just give me high-speed internet!" It seems that the virtual world and the ballot box are cohabitating in a symbiotic relationship that is too electric to ignore. You could say that the "broadbandwagon effect" is in full force – a phenomenon that doesn't require any extra bandwidth to acknowledge!

With the statistical significance of this correlation and the rich narrative painted by the scatterplot resembling an intricate digital tapestry, our study underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of the contemporary political landscape. It's almost as if the political clout in Oklahoma is directly correlated to the strength of the Wi-Fi signal – a notion that raises the question, "Are we voting for candidates or are we voting for faster downloads?"

In light of these compelling findings, it’s safe to say that no further research is needed in this area. As the saying goes, "Don't look a gift horse in the mouth," unless that horse is delivering research findings, in which case, keep trotting forward.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Red State Republicans: Relationship between Votes and Virtual Voyages. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Political Geography and Virtual Reality


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Red State Republicans: Relationship between Votes and Virtual Voyages. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Political Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Red State Republicans: Relationship between Votes and Virtual Voyages with an abstract of The influence of digital connectivity on political preferences has been a topic of growing interest within the field of electoral research. In our study, we examined the connection between the percentage of votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Oklahoma and the internet access rate among US citizens. Through a thorough analysis of extensive data sets sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Statista, we set out to unpack this complex correlation.
Our findings revealed a remarkably robust positive correlation between Republican votes in the Sooner State and internet access rates, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9710951 exhibiting a staggering association. P < 0.01 indicated the statistical significance of this link, prompting us to delve further into the humorous yet perplexing question: Are red waves riding on digital wavelengths?
Uncovering this connection took us down a path paved with data analytics and dad jokes, leaving us to ponder whether internet memes could be more influential than we ever imagined. Our study not only sheds light on the interplay between conservative voting patterns and online connectivity but also underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of the modern intersection between politics and the digital realm.

ChatGPT:

Republican votes, internet access rates, Oklahoma, conservative voting patterns, digital connectivity, political preferences, US citizens, digital influence, correlation analysis, red state Republicans, digital connectivity and voting, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Statista, internet memes, online connectivity and voting, modern politics, virtual voyages

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma

Internet Access Rate among US Citizens
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Internet Access Rate among US Citizens

Correlation r = 0.9710951 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9430257 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 94.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Internet Access Rate among US Citizens) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma) over the 6 years from 2000 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0012. 0.0012411656972660938000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.12% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 806 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.75, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200020042008201220162020
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma (Total votes)7443379597929601658913259491361020280
Internet Access Rate among US Citizens (Internet access)55798274.785.5487




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([744337,959792,960165,891325,949136,1020280,])
array_2 = np.array([55,79,82,74.7,85.54,87,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma"
array_2_name = "Internet Access Rate among US Citizens"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 5177 · Black Variable ID: 26021 · Red Variable ID: 397
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0