about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,062 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the 'is this a pigeon' meme and the second variable is The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2019, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the 'is this a pigeon' meme gained popularity, it sparked a renewed interest in identifying different species, leading to an unexpected influx of individuals pursuing careers in biology. This trend was particularly pronounced in Arkansas, where the combination of meme-inspired curiosity and a deep reverence for local wildlife culminated in a surge of aspiring biological science teachers. It seems that sometimes, the flight of educational inspiration can truly be meme-powered!

Create a meme inspired by the is this a pigeon meme that in some way references The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the 'is this a pigeon' meme caused The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Popular Pigeon Perceptions: A Correlative Study on the 'Is this a Pigeon' Meme and University Biological Science Faculty in Arkansas

The Journal of Avian Anthropology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'is this a pigeon' meme and The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9218989 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2019.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Popular Pigeon Perceptions: A Correlative Study on the 'Is this a Pigeon' Meme and University Biological Science Faculty in Arkansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Pigeons, memes, and Arkansas - an unlikely trio, yet our study unveils the intriguing interplay between these disparate elements. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to investigate the potential link between the pervasive "is this a pigeon" meme and the number of biological science teachers employed in Arkansas universities. Unearthing a rather robust correlation coefficient of 0.9218989 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2007 to 2019, it appears that the meme's soaring popularity may have feathered its influence in unexpected realms. While we do not purport causation, the statistical synchrony between meme virality and academic employment does raise fascinating questions about the broader cultural and professional impacts of internet phenomena. Consequently, our findings call for further avian-attentive scrutiny of the lighthearted yet impactful meme ecosystem.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'is this a pigeon' meme and The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Popular Pigeon Perceptions: A Correlative Study on the 'Is this a Pigeon' Meme and University Biological Science Faculty in Arkansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Pigeons, memes, and Arkansas - an unlikely trio, yet our study unveils the intriguing interplay between these disparate elements. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to investigate the potential link between the pervasive "is this a pigeon" meme and the number of biological science teachers employed in Arkansas universities. Unearthing a rather robust correlation coefficient of 0.9218989 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2007 to 2019, it appears that the meme's soaring popularity may have feathered its influence in unexpected realms. While we do not purport causation, the statistical synchrony between meme virality and academic employment does raise fascinating questions about the broader cultural and professional impacts of internet phenomena. Consequently, our findings call for further avian-attentive scrutiny of the lighthearted yet impactful meme ecosystem.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of memes has undeniably become an integral part of contemporary internet culture, infiltrating social media feeds, online forums, and digital communication platforms. Amidst this digital cacophony, one particular meme has captured the collective imagination of netizens worldwide: the "is this a pigeon" meme. This viral image, featuring an animated humanoid character misidentifying a butterfly as a pigeon, has, against all odds, secured its perch in the annals of internet lore.

In a parallel, yet equally improbable domain, the state of Arkansas is known for its scenic landscapes, ample opportunities for outdoor recreation, and an unexpectedly strong presence of university biological science teachers. Here, in this heartland of natural beauty, the academic community devoted to the study of living organisms thrives, seemingly unaffected by the whims of online trends.

Our study critically examines the seemingly incongruous relationship between these two seemingly disparate phenomena – the "is this a pigeon" meme and the number of biological science faculty members employed by universities in the state of Arkansas. At first glance, one might wonder what connection, if any, exists between the whimsical world of internet memes and the scholarly pursuits of biological science educators. However, as we will uncover in this research, the enigmatic interplay between popular internet culture and academic labor dynamics is not to be dismissed out of hand.

In the following sections, we will dissect our findings, providing a bird's-eye view of the correlations and implications for both the meme enthusiasts and the academic community. Our investigation aims to shed light on this unlikely correlation, whether real or merely coincidental, and pave the way for a more nuanced understanding of the broader influences of internet culture on academic landscapes. As we embark on this avian-themed academic adventure, ready your binoculars and brace for the unexpected as we navigate the intersection where internet memes and academic pursuits meet.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'is this a pigeon' meme and The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Popular Pigeon Perceptions: A Correlative Study on the 'Is this a Pigeon' Meme and University Biological Science Faculty in Arkansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Pigeons, memes, and Arkansas - an unlikely trio, yet our study unveils the intriguing interplay between these disparate elements. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to investigate the potential link between the pervasive "is this a pigeon" meme and the number of biological science teachers employed in Arkansas universities. Unearthing a rather robust correlation coefficient of 0.9218989 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2007 to 2019, it appears that the meme's soaring popularity may have feathered its influence in unexpected realms. While we do not purport causation, the statistical synchrony between meme virality and academic employment does raise fascinating questions about the broader cultural and professional impacts of internet phenomena. Consequently, our findings call for further avian-attentive scrutiny of the lighthearted yet impactful meme ecosystem.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of memes has undeniably become an integral part of contemporary internet culture, infiltrating social media feeds, online forums, and digital communication platforms. Amidst this digital cacophony, one particular meme has captured the collective imagination of netizens worldwide: the "is this a pigeon" meme. This viral image, featuring an animated humanoid character misidentifying a butterfly as a pigeon, has, against all odds, secured its perch in the annals of internet lore.
In a parallel, yet equally improbable domain, the state of Arkansas is known for its scenic landscapes, ample opportunities for outdoor recreation, and an unexpectedly strong presence of university biological science teachers. Here, in this heartland of natural beauty, the academic community devoted to the study of living organisms thrives, seemingly unaffected by the whims of online trends.
Our study critically examines the seemingly incongruous relationship between these two seemingly disparate phenomena – the "is this a pigeon" meme and the number of biological science faculty members employed by universities in the state of Arkansas. At first glance, one might wonder what connection, if any, exists between the whimsical world of internet memes and the scholarly pursuits of biological science educators. However, as we will uncover in this research, the enigmatic interplay between popular internet culture and academic labor dynamics is not to be dismissed out of hand.
In the following sections, we will dissect our findings, providing a bird's-eye view of the correlations and implications for both the meme enthusiasts and the academic community. Our investigation aims to shed light on this unlikely correlation, whether real or merely coincidental, and pave the way for a more nuanced understanding of the broader influences of internet culture on academic landscapes. As we embark on this avian-themed academic adventure, ready your binoculars and brace for the unexpected as we navigate the intersection where internet memes and academic pursuits meet.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Impact of Internet Culture on Contemporary Society," Smith examines the widespread influence of memes on various aspects of modern life, from social interactions to consumer behavior. While Smith primarily focuses on the broader societal implications of internet memes, the relevance of memes in niche fields such as academia remains an understudied area. Similarly, Doe, in "Exploring Viral Phenomena in the Digital Age," delves into the mechanisms behind the rapid dissemination of viral content and its effects on individual and collective behavior. However, the specific impact of a single meme on professional employment trends is not a central theme in Doe's work, leaving a significant gap in the current understanding of meme dynamics.

Moving beyond the scholarly realm, "The Selfish Gene" by Richard Dawkins provides insights into the evolutionary significance of memes as units of cultural transmission, shedding light on their persistent and wide-ranging influence. In a more speculative vein, "To Kill a Mockingbird" by Harper Lee and "The Hunger Games" by Suzanne Collins, while not directly related to memes or biological science, embody themes of perception and misidentification that resonate with the essence of the "is this a pigeon" meme.

On a more light-hearted note, the investigative journey to comprehend meme culture included viewing episodes of "Bird Box" and "The Big Bang Theory," where diverse avian references prompted unexpected musings on the potential cognitive impacts of popular internet memes.

As the field of meme studies continues to evolve, it is imperative to contextualize meme phenomena within the wider tapestry of societal and cultural dynamics. This interdisciplinary approach enables a more holistic understanding of the nuanced interplay between seemingly unrelated entities such as memes and academic employment patterns. Through this synthesis of diverse perspectives, this paper endeavors to infuse a touch of humor and levity into the traditionally stoic discourse of scholarly research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'is this a pigeon' meme and The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2007 to 2019

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Popular Pigeon Perceptions: A Correlative Study on the 'Is this a Pigeon' Meme and University Biological Science Faculty in Arkansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Pigeons, memes, and Arkansas - an unlikely trio, yet our study unveils the intriguing interplay between these disparate elements. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to investigate the potential link between the pervasive "is this a pigeon" meme and the number of biological science teachers employed in Arkansas universities. Unearthing a rather robust correlation coefficient of 0.9218989 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2007 to 2019, it appears that the meme's soaring popularity may have feathered its influence in unexpected realms. While we do not purport causation, the statistical synchrony between meme virality and academic employment does raise fascinating questions about the broader cultural and professional impacts of internet phenomena. Consequently, our findings call for further avian-attentive scrutiny of the lighthearted yet impactful meme ecosystem.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of memes has undeniably become an integral part of contemporary internet culture, infiltrating social media feeds, online forums, and digital communication platforms. Amidst this digital cacophony, one particular meme has captured the collective imagination of netizens worldwide: the "is this a pigeon" meme. This viral image, featuring an animated humanoid character misidentifying a butterfly as a pigeon, has, against all odds, secured its perch in the annals of internet lore.
In a parallel, yet equally improbable domain, the state of Arkansas is known for its scenic landscapes, ample opportunities for outdoor recreation, and an unexpectedly strong presence of university biological science teachers. Here, in this heartland of natural beauty, the academic community devoted to the study of living organisms thrives, seemingly unaffected by the whims of online trends.
Our study critically examines the seemingly incongruous relationship between these two seemingly disparate phenomena – the "is this a pigeon" meme and the number of biological science faculty members employed by universities in the state of Arkansas. At first glance, one might wonder what connection, if any, exists between the whimsical world of internet memes and the scholarly pursuits of biological science educators. However, as we will uncover in this research, the enigmatic interplay between popular internet culture and academic labor dynamics is not to be dismissed out of hand.
In the following sections, we will dissect our findings, providing a bird's-eye view of the correlations and implications for both the meme enthusiasts and the academic community. Our investigation aims to shed light on this unlikely correlation, whether real or merely coincidental, and pave the way for a more nuanced understanding of the broader influences of internet culture on academic landscapes. As we embark on this avian-themed academic adventure, ready your binoculars and brace for the unexpected as we navigate the intersection where internet memes and academic pursuits meet.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on our avian-themed academic adventure, we employed a mixed-method approach to unravel the potential correlations between the "is this a pigeon" meme's popularity and the number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas. Our research team conducted a comprehensive data collection from a variety of sources, with a significant emphasis on data sourced from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This data spanned from 2007 to 2019, providing a robust timeframe for our investigation.

First and foremost, our utilization of Google Trends allowed us to measure the relative search interest in the "is this a pigeon" meme over the specified time period. This approach provided a quantitative perspective on the meme's trajectory in cyberspace, enabling us to discern its periods of peak virality and potential influence. Additionally, we integrated data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to acquire comprehensive records of the number of biological science faculty members employed by Arkansas universities during the same temporal span.

Given the inherent humor and whimsy of the "is this a pigeon" meme, we humorously tailored our research methods to align with the lighthearted nature of our subject matter (and perhaps there was an attempt to keep us sane amidst the rigors of deciphering meme trends). For instance, in a self-proclaimed attempt to think like the animated character attempting to identify the butterfly as a pigeon, we implemented a "flighty" weighted correlation analysis to determine the degree of association between meme popularity and the employment trends of biological science faculty members in Arkansas. This analysis was designed to "feather out" any potential patterns and highlight the statistical synchrony that may exist between the meme's virality and academic employment.

Furthermore, in keeping with the avian theme of our study, our research team endeavored to adopt a "bird's-eye view" approach to the data analysis. This involved scrutinizing the temporal patterns and fluctuations in both the meme's prominence and the academic labor market in Arkansas from a vantage point that was both whimsical and methodologically sound.

In summary, our methodology emerged as a blend of quantitative data analysis with a lighthearted avian-centric lens, allowing us to shed light on the unexpected intersection between internet meme culture and the academic ecosystem in Arkansas. Through this approach, we aimed to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the often whimsical world of internet memes and the labor dynamics within the realm of biological sciences education.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'is this a pigeon' meme and The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2007 to 2019, you found a correlation 0.9218989, r-squared of 0.8498976, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Popular Pigeon Perceptions: A Correlative Study on the 'Is this a Pigeon' Meme and University Biological Science Faculty in Arkansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Pigeons, memes, and Arkansas - an unlikely trio, yet our study unveils the intriguing interplay between these disparate elements. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to investigate the potential link between the pervasive "is this a pigeon" meme and the number of biological science teachers employed in Arkansas universities. Unearthing a rather robust correlation coefficient of 0.9218989 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2007 to 2019, it appears that the meme's soaring popularity may have feathered its influence in unexpected realms. While we do not purport causation, the statistical synchrony between meme virality and academic employment does raise fascinating questions about the broader cultural and professional impacts of internet phenomena. Consequently, our findings call for further avian-attentive scrutiny of the lighthearted yet impactful meme ecosystem.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of memes has undeniably become an integral part of contemporary internet culture, infiltrating social media feeds, online forums, and digital communication platforms. Amidst this digital cacophony, one particular meme has captured the collective imagination of netizens worldwide: the "is this a pigeon" meme. This viral image, featuring an animated humanoid character misidentifying a butterfly as a pigeon, has, against all odds, secured its perch in the annals of internet lore.
In a parallel, yet equally improbable domain, the state of Arkansas is known for its scenic landscapes, ample opportunities for outdoor recreation, and an unexpectedly strong presence of university biological science teachers. Here, in this heartland of natural beauty, the academic community devoted to the study of living organisms thrives, seemingly unaffected by the whims of online trends.
Our study critically examines the seemingly incongruous relationship between these two seemingly disparate phenomena – the "is this a pigeon" meme and the number of biological science faculty members employed by universities in the state of Arkansas. At first glance, one might wonder what connection, if any, exists between the whimsical world of internet memes and the scholarly pursuits of biological science educators. However, as we will uncover in this research, the enigmatic interplay between popular internet culture and academic labor dynamics is not to be dismissed out of hand.
In the following sections, we will dissect our findings, providing a bird's-eye view of the correlations and implications for both the meme enthusiasts and the academic community. Our investigation aims to shed light on this unlikely correlation, whether real or merely coincidental, and pave the way for a more nuanced understanding of the broader influences of internet culture on academic landscapes. As we embark on this avian-themed academic adventure, ready your binoculars and brace for the unexpected as we navigate the intersection where internet memes and academic pursuits meet.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

**RESULTS**

The results of our study reveal a striking correlation between the popularity of the "is this a pigeon" meme and the number of university biological science teachers in the state of Arkansas for the time period 2007 to 2019. The correlation coefficient of 0.9218989 indicates a remarkably strong positive relationship between these two seemingly divergent domains, with an r-squared value of 0.8498976 underscoring the substantial degree of variability in the biological science teacher employment that can be explained by the meme's popularity. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggests that this correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance, further cementing the statistical significance of our findings.

Figure 1 illustrates this robust correlation through a scatterplot, depicting the close alignment between the meme's popularity and the employment of biological science faculty in Arkansas universities. While we acknowledge that correlation does not imply causation, the strength of the association we observed between these variables certainly piques curiosity and warrants further investigation into the mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship.

The implications of our findings extend beyond the realms of mere statistical curiosity. They beckon us to consider the nuanced interplay between internet phenomena and academic labor dynamics, prompting contemplation on the potential cultural, social, and professional impacts of viral memes within the academic landscape. As we delve into the avian-themed world of internet culture and academic pursuits, our results nudge us to recognize the symbiotic relationship that may exist between seemingly divergent domains, inviting researchers and meme enthusiasts alike to ponder the potential far-reaching ramifications of viral internet content.

In light of these compelling results, further exploration and interdisciplinary collaboration are warranted to unravel the enigmatic association between internet memes and academic employment dynamics. Our findings, while inherently lighthearted and unexpected, impel us to cast a discerning eye on the intricate interconnections that underpin modern digital culture and academic pursuits. Thus, we beckon researchers to come together and spread their wings within this uncharted territory, so to speak, as we embark on a scholarly exploration of the whimsical yet impactful realms of internet memes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'is this a pigeon' meme and The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Popular Pigeon Perceptions: A Correlative Study on the 'Is this a Pigeon' Meme and University Biological Science Faculty in Arkansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Pigeons, memes, and Arkansas - an unlikely trio, yet our study unveils the intriguing interplay between these disparate elements. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to investigate the potential link between the pervasive "is this a pigeon" meme and the number of biological science teachers employed in Arkansas universities. Unearthing a rather robust correlation coefficient of 0.9218989 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2007 to 2019, it appears that the meme's soaring popularity may have feathered its influence in unexpected realms. While we do not purport causation, the statistical synchrony between meme virality and academic employment does raise fascinating questions about the broader cultural and professional impacts of internet phenomena. Consequently, our findings call for further avian-attentive scrutiny of the lighthearted yet impactful meme ecosystem.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Impact of Internet Culture on Contemporary Society," Smith examines the widespread influence of memes on various aspects of modern life, from social interactions to consumer behavior. While Smith primarily focuses on the broader societal implications of internet memes, the relevance of memes in niche fields such as academia remains an understudied area. Similarly, Doe, in "Exploring Viral Phenomena in the Digital Age," delves into the mechanisms behind the rapid dissemination of viral content and its effects on individual and collective behavior. However, the specific impact of a single meme on professional employment trends is not a central theme in Doe's work, leaving a significant gap in the current understanding of meme dynamics.
Moving beyond the scholarly realm, "The Selfish Gene" by Richard Dawkins provides insights into the evolutionary significance of memes as units of cultural transmission, shedding light on their persistent and wide-ranging influence. In a more speculative vein, "To Kill a Mockingbird" by Harper Lee and "The Hunger Games" by Suzanne Collins, while not directly related to memes or biological science, embody themes of perception and misidentification that resonate with the essence of the "is this a pigeon" meme.
On a more light-hearted note, the investigative journey to comprehend meme culture included viewing episodes of "Bird Box" and "The Big Bang Theory," where diverse avian references prompted unexpected musings on the potential cognitive impacts of popular internet memes.
As the field of meme studies continues to evolve, it is imperative to contextualize meme phenomena within the wider tapestry of societal and cultural dynamics. This interdisciplinary approach enables a more holistic understanding of the nuanced interplay between seemingly unrelated entities such as memes and academic employment patterns. Through this synthesis of diverse perspectives, this paper endeavors to infuse a touch of humor and levity into the traditionally stoic discourse of scholarly research.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study reveal a striking correlation between the popularity of the "is this a pigeon" meme and the number of university biological science teachers in the state of Arkansas for the time period 2007 to 2019. The correlation coefficient of 0.9218989 indicates a remarkably strong positive relationship between these two seemingly divergent domains, with an r-squared value of 0.8498976 underscoring the substantial degree of variability in the biological science teacher employment that can be explained by the meme's popularity. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggests that this correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance, further cementing the statistical significance of our findings.
Figure 1 illustrates this robust correlation through a scatterplot, depicting the close alignment between the meme's popularity and the employment of biological science faculty in Arkansas universities. While we acknowledge that correlation does not imply causation, the strength of the association we observed between these variables certainly piques curiosity and warrants further investigation into the mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship.
The implications of our findings extend beyond the realms of mere statistical curiosity. They beckon us to consider the nuanced interplay between internet phenomena and academic labor dynamics, prompting contemplation on the potential cultural, social, and professional impacts of viral memes within the academic landscape. As we delve into the avian-themed world of internet culture and academic pursuits, our results nudge us to recognize the symbiotic relationship that may exist between seemingly divergent domains, inviting researchers and meme enthusiasts alike to ponder the potential far-reaching ramifications of viral internet content.
In light of these compelling results, further exploration and interdisciplinary collaboration are warranted to unravel the enigmatic association between internet memes and academic employment dynamics. Our findings, while inherently lighthearted and unexpected, impel us to cast a discerning eye on the intricate interconnections that underpin modern digital culture and academic pursuits. Thus, we beckon researchers to come together and spread their wings within this uncharted territory, so to speak, as we embark on a scholarly exploration of the whimsical yet impactful realms of internet memes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The unmistakable synchronicity between the 'is this a pigeon' meme and the employment of biological science faculty in Arkansas unfurls a cornucopia of perplexing yet enthralling implications. While one might be forgiven for thinking that memes and academic employment are as unrelated as chalk and cheese, our findings lend credence to the notion that the interplay of internet phenomena and professional trajectories is a high-flying affair.

Revisiting the quirky elements of our literature review, one cannot help but marvel at the unexpected resonance of the 'Bird Box' and 'The Big Bang Theory' with our research questions. Whether by a curious stroke of serendipity or a whimsical twist of fate, these popular culture references subtly attune us to the intricate avian-themed tapestry of modern digital culture, thereby emphasizing the pervasive impact of internet memes on diverse spheres of human experience.

In a similar vein, the light-hearted themes of misidentification and perception embedded in 'To Kill a Mockingbird' and 'The Hunger Games' seem to echo the essence of the 'is this a pigeon' meme in a rather unexpected manner. This curious parallel serves as a whimsical reminder of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate cultural artifacts and phenomena, underscoring the need for an interdisciplinary lens to illuminate the far-reaching impacts of internet memes.

Our results not only uphold the scholarly discourse on meme dynamics, in particular the significant contributions of Smith and Doe, but also highlight the timely relevance of Richard Dawkins' seminal work on the evolutionary significance of memes. Like the proverbial 'selfish gene', the 'is this a pigeon' meme appears to have orchestrated a remarkable cultural spread, ultimately leaving its distinct imprint in the domain of academic employment.

Beyond the cerebral musings and whimsical parallels, our findings beckon researchers to spread their academic wings and delve into the uncharted territories of meme-infused professional landscapes. The robust correlation uncovered incites curiosity about the potential professional and cultural reverberations of internet memes, imploring scholars to steer their gaze towards the unexpected yet impactful intersections of digital culture and academic pursuits.

As we reflect on the mind-boggling nexus between the whimsical realm of internet memes and the serious domain of academic employment, it becomes apparent that the boundaries between levity and gravity, humor and professionalism, may not be as stark as one might assume. This realization, in itself, serves as an intriguing invitation for scholars to approach their research endeavors with a touch of lightheartedness and open-minded curiosity, thereby unfurling the potential for delightful discoveries in the most unexpected of places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'is this a pigeon' meme and The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Popular Pigeon Perceptions: A Correlative Study on the 'Is this a Pigeon' Meme and University Biological Science Faculty in Arkansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Pigeons, memes, and Arkansas - an unlikely trio, yet our study unveils the intriguing interplay between these disparate elements. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to investigate the potential link between the pervasive "is this a pigeon" meme and the number of biological science teachers employed in Arkansas universities. Unearthing a rather robust correlation coefficient of 0.9218989 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2007 to 2019, it appears that the meme's soaring popularity may have feathered its influence in unexpected realms. While we do not purport causation, the statistical synchrony between meme virality and academic employment does raise fascinating questions about the broader cultural and professional impacts of internet phenomena. Consequently, our findings call for further avian-attentive scrutiny of the lighthearted yet impactful meme ecosystem.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of memes has undeniably become an integral part of contemporary internet culture, infiltrating social media feeds, online forums, and digital communication platforms. Amidst this digital cacophony, one particular meme has captured the collective imagination of netizens worldwide: the "is this a pigeon" meme. This viral image, featuring an animated humanoid character misidentifying a butterfly as a pigeon, has, against all odds, secured its perch in the annals of internet lore.
In a parallel, yet equally improbable domain, the state of Arkansas is known for its scenic landscapes, ample opportunities for outdoor recreation, and an unexpectedly strong presence of university biological science teachers. Here, in this heartland of natural beauty, the academic community devoted to the study of living organisms thrives, seemingly unaffected by the whims of online trends.
Our study critically examines the seemingly incongruous relationship between these two seemingly disparate phenomena – the "is this a pigeon" meme and the number of biological science faculty members employed by universities in the state of Arkansas. At first glance, one might wonder what connection, if any, exists between the whimsical world of internet memes and the scholarly pursuits of biological science educators. However, as we will uncover in this research, the enigmatic interplay between popular internet culture and academic labor dynamics is not to be dismissed out of hand.
In the following sections, we will dissect our findings, providing a bird's-eye view of the correlations and implications for both the meme enthusiasts and the academic community. Our investigation aims to shed light on this unlikely correlation, whether real or merely coincidental, and pave the way for a more nuanced understanding of the broader influences of internet culture on academic landscapes. As we embark on this avian-themed academic adventure, ready your binoculars and brace for the unexpected as we navigate the intersection where internet memes and academic pursuits meet.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study reveal a striking correlation between the popularity of the "is this a pigeon" meme and the number of university biological science teachers in the state of Arkansas for the time period 2007 to 2019. The correlation coefficient of 0.9218989 indicates a remarkably strong positive relationship between these two seemingly divergent domains, with an r-squared value of 0.8498976 underscoring the substantial degree of variability in the biological science teacher employment that can be explained by the meme's popularity. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggests that this correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance, further cementing the statistical significance of our findings.
Figure 1 illustrates this robust correlation through a scatterplot, depicting the close alignment between the meme's popularity and the employment of biological science faculty in Arkansas universities. While we acknowledge that correlation does not imply causation, the strength of the association we observed between these variables certainly piques curiosity and warrants further investigation into the mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship.
The implications of our findings extend beyond the realms of mere statistical curiosity. They beckon us to consider the nuanced interplay between internet phenomena and academic labor dynamics, prompting contemplation on the potential cultural, social, and professional impacts of viral memes within the academic landscape. As we delve into the avian-themed world of internet culture and academic pursuits, our results nudge us to recognize the symbiotic relationship that may exist between seemingly divergent domains, inviting researchers and meme enthusiasts alike to ponder the potential far-reaching ramifications of viral internet content.
In light of these compelling results, further exploration and interdisciplinary collaboration are warranted to unravel the enigmatic association between internet memes and academic employment dynamics. Our findings, while inherently lighthearted and unexpected, impel us to cast a discerning eye on the intricate interconnections that underpin modern digital culture and academic pursuits. Thus, we beckon researchers to come together and spread their wings within this uncharted territory, so to speak, as we embark on a scholarly exploration of the whimsical yet impactful realms of internet memes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study unravels the unexpected and intriguing correlation between the pervasive "is this a pigeon" meme and the employment of biological science teachers in Arkansas universities. While our findings do not provide definitive evidence of causation, the statistical synchrony between meme virality and academic employment certainly raises fascinating questions about the broader cultural and professional impacts of internet phenomena. It appears that the meme's soaring popularity may have indeed feathered its influence in unforeseen realms, suggesting a potential avian-affinity within the academic community. Our results further underscore the need for interdisciplinary collaboration and avian-attentive scrutiny of the lighthearted yet impactful meme ecosystem. Evidently, the connection between mocking misidentification and scholarly pursuits is not to be dismissed out of hand.

As we contemplate the implications of our findings, it seems that the crossover between internet memes and academic labor dynamics may not be for the birds after all. The ornithological implications of our results urge further exploration into the mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship, calling for a bird's-eye view of the cultural, professional, and perhaps even comical impacts of viral memes within the academic landscape. Our research thus suggests that the study of internet culture and avian biology may no longer be worlds apart, but rather, intertwined in unsuspectingly harmonious ways.

In light of these compelling findings, it's clear that no more research is needed in this area. It seems we've just about ruffled enough feathers with this study.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Popular Pigeon Perceptions: A Correlative Study on the 'Is this a Pigeon' Meme and University Biological Science Faculty in Arkansas. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Avian Anthropology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Popular Pigeon Perceptions: A Correlative Study on the 'Is this a Pigeon' Meme and University Biological Science Faculty in Arkansas. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Institute for Avian Cognitive Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Popular Pigeon Perceptions: A Correlative Study on the 'Is this a Pigeon' Meme and University Biological Science Faculty in Arkansas with an abstract of Pigeons, memes, and Arkansas - an unlikely trio, yet our study unveils the intriguing interplay between these disparate elements. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to investigate the potential link between the pervasive "is this a pigeon" meme and the number of biological science teachers employed in Arkansas universities. Unearthing a rather robust correlation coefficient of 0.9218989 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2007 to 2019, it appears that the meme's soaring popularity may have feathered its influence in unexpected realms. While we do not purport causation, the statistical synchrony between meme virality and academic employment does raise fascinating questions about the broader cultural and professional impacts of internet phenomena. Consequently, our findings call for further avian-attentive scrutiny of the lighthearted yet impactful meme ecosystem.

ChatGPT:

"Is this a Pigeon" meme, biological science faculty, Arkansas, Google Trends, Bureau of Labor Statistics, meme virality, internet phenomena, meme ecosystem, cultural impact, professional impact, academic employment

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the 'is this a pigeon' meme
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'is this a pigeon' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.

See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'is this a pigeon' meme

The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of biological science teachers, postsecondary in Arkansas
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas

Correlation r = 0.9218989 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8498976 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the 'is this a pigeon' meme) over the 13 years from 2007 through 2019.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.4E-6. 0.0000074318306624932444000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.00074% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 134,556 random variables You don't actually need 134 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.75, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019
Popularity of the 'is this a pigeon' meme (Relative popularity)0.25010.4545450.5714290.5454551.333330.9166671.363641.51.5833322.33339.16667
The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas (Laborers)2703304504604804604403703603803801730420




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.25,0,1,0.454545,0.571429,0.545455,1.33333,0.916667,1.36364,1.5,1.58333,22.3333,9.16667,])
array_2 = np.array([270,330,450,460,480,460,440,370,360,380,380,1730,420,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the 'is this a pigeon' meme"
array_2_name = "The number of university biological science teachers in Arkansas"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 5062 · Black Variable ID: 25103 · Red Variable ID: 5141
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0