about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,887 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Cincinnati and the second variable is The number of postmasters in Ohio.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As air quality improved in Cincinnati, carrier pigeons no longer needed to take extended sick leaves, leading to a surplus of highly skilled bird employees at the post office. Unable to find suitable positions for this influx of avian talent, the number of postmasters in Ohio naturally decreased as the pigeons took over all the important roles.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a prestigious magazine cover, resembling a TIME magazine layout, with a prominent image of carrier pigeons taking over post office duties in Cincinnati. The scene should show carrier pigeons perched on a post office building in a beautifully clear sky. The pigeons are seen sorting mail and delivering packages with great efficiency, with human postmasters waving goodbye, acknowledging the pigeons' unprecedented takeover. The image should showcase the confident and capable demeanor of the pigeons as they successfully handle important postal tasks, with the decreasing presence of human postmasters subtly implied. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Cincinnati and The number of postmasters in Ohio. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A TIME magazine cover image A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Futuristic Steampunk a funny image you would see on reddit
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Cincinnati and The number of postmasters in Ohio, in the following situation: As air quality improved in Cincinnati, carrier pigeons no longer needed to take extended sick leaves, leading to a surplus of highly skilled bird employees at the post office. Unable to find suitable positions for this influx of avian talent, the number of postmasters in Ohio naturally decreased as the pigeons took over all the important roles.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a park in Cincinnati, the sky is clear as the air quality improves. A group of carrier pigeons is perched on a post office building, looking healthy and active. Inside the building, some pigeons are sorting mail and delivering packages with great efficiency. The human postmasters are seen leaving their posts, waving goodbye as they realize the pigeons have taken over their roles. The number of postmasters in Ohio decreases as the pigeons confidently handle all the important tasks.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a park in Cincinnati, the sky is clear as the air quality improves. A group of carrier pigeons is perched on a post office building, looking healthy and active. Inside the building, some pigeons are sorting mail and delivering packages with great efficiency. The human postmasters are seen leaving their posts, waving goodbye as they realize the pigeons have taken over their roles. The number of postmasters in Ohio decreases as the pigeons confidently handle all the important tasks. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a prestigious magazine cover, resembling a TIME magazine layout, with a prominent image of carrier pigeons taking over post office duties in Cincinnati. The scene should show carrier pigeons perched on a post office building in a beautifully clear sky. The pigeons are seen sorting mail and delivering packages with great efficiency, with human postmasters waving goodbye, acknowledging the pigeons' unprecedented takeover. The image should showcase the confident and capable demeanor of the pigeons as they successfully handle important postal tasks, with the decreasing presence of human postmasters subtly implied.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Cincinnati caused The number of postmasters in Ohio to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Perfuming Postmaster Placement: Pittsburgh Plume Predisposes Peculiar Postal Positions

Journal of Postal Peculiarities

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Cincinnati and The number of postmasters in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8261575 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Perfuming Postmaster Placement: Pittsburgh Plume Predisposes Peculiar Postal Positions

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the perplexing and pungent link between air pollution in Cincinnati, particularly the Pittsburgh Plume effect, and the peculiar postal placement of postmasters in Ohio. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning a period from 2003 to 2022, our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8261575 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This study delves into the winds of change, the breath of fresh air, and the mailstrom of data to offer insights into the unseen forces influencing the postal landscape. Our findings not only provide an intriguing correlation but also serve as a breath of fresh air in the realm of postal research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Cincinnati and The number of postmasters in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Perfuming Postmaster Placement: Pittsburgh Plume Predisposes Peculiar Postal Positions

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the perplexing and pungent link between air pollution in Cincinnati, particularly the Pittsburgh Plume effect, and the peculiar postal placement of postmasters in Ohio. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning a period from 2003 to 2022, our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8261575 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This study delves into the winds of change, the breath of fresh air, and the mailstrom of data to offer insights into the unseen forces influencing the postal landscape. Our findings not only provide an intriguing correlation but also serve as a breath of fresh air in the realm of postal research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The confluence of air pollution and postal management may initially seem as incongruous as trying to mail a package without addressing it. However, our investigation into the relationship between the Pittsburgh Plume effect and the placement of postmasters in Ohio has uncovered a connection that is as intriguing as it is unexpected.

Air pollution, with its invisible tendrils reaching far and wide, has long been a topic of concern for both environmentalists and unfortunate pedestrians alike. The infamous Pittsburgh Plume, with its enigmatic ability to waft its way from Cincinnati to influence the air quality in neighboring regions, has captured the attention of researchers and storytellers alike.

On the other hand, the appointment of postmasters in Ohio may appear as unassuming as an unstamped postcard, but the intricacies of postal placement have a tremendous impact on the effective functioning of the mail system. It is within this seemingly disparate pair of subjects that our research has uncovered an unexpected relationship, one that may hold implications for both environmental policy and postal efficiency.

By heeding the call of curiosity and venturing into unexplored territories of research, we sought to unravel the mystery behind the influence of air pollution, particularly the Pittsburgh Plume, on the number and location of postmasters in Ohio. Drawing on data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on this quest with the hope of shedding light on a phenomenon that has floated under the radar of academic inquiry. As we embarked on our research journey, we faced headwinds of skepticism and raised eyebrows, but we persevered in our pursuit of illuminating insights and unforeseen connections.

Despite the initial skepticism, our findings present a compelling correlation between air pollution levels in Cincinnati, influenced by the Pittsburgh Plume, and the distribution of postmasters in Ohio. The statistical analysis we conducted revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8261575, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, lending robust support to the significance of our findings.

Well, if there's one thing we've learned from this, it's that sometimes the wind does more than just carry dust and errant leaves - it carries intriguing connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. So, let's dig deeper into the data, shall we?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Cincinnati and The number of postmasters in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Perfuming Postmaster Placement: Pittsburgh Plume Predisposes Peculiar Postal Positions

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the perplexing and pungent link between air pollution in Cincinnati, particularly the Pittsburgh Plume effect, and the peculiar postal placement of postmasters in Ohio. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning a period from 2003 to 2022, our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8261575 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This study delves into the winds of change, the breath of fresh air, and the mailstrom of data to offer insights into the unseen forces influencing the postal landscape. Our findings not only provide an intriguing correlation but also serve as a breath of fresh air in the realm of postal research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The confluence of air pollution and postal management may initially seem as incongruous as trying to mail a package without addressing it. However, our investigation into the relationship between the Pittsburgh Plume effect and the placement of postmasters in Ohio has uncovered a connection that is as intriguing as it is unexpected.
Air pollution, with its invisible tendrils reaching far and wide, has long been a topic of concern for both environmentalists and unfortunate pedestrians alike. The infamous Pittsburgh Plume, with its enigmatic ability to waft its way from Cincinnati to influence the air quality in neighboring regions, has captured the attention of researchers and storytellers alike.
On the other hand, the appointment of postmasters in Ohio may appear as unassuming as an unstamped postcard, but the intricacies of postal placement have a tremendous impact on the effective functioning of the mail system. It is within this seemingly disparate pair of subjects that our research has uncovered an unexpected relationship, one that may hold implications for both environmental policy and postal efficiency.
By heeding the call of curiosity and venturing into unexplored territories of research, we sought to unravel the mystery behind the influence of air pollution, particularly the Pittsburgh Plume, on the number and location of postmasters in Ohio. Drawing on data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on this quest with the hope of shedding light on a phenomenon that has floated under the radar of academic inquiry. As we embarked on our research journey, we faced headwinds of skepticism and raised eyebrows, but we persevered in our pursuit of illuminating insights and unforeseen connections.
Despite the initial skepticism, our findings present a compelling correlation between air pollution levels in Cincinnati, influenced by the Pittsburgh Plume, and the distribution of postmasters in Ohio. The statistical analysis we conducted revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8261575, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, lending robust support to the significance of our findings.
Well, if there's one thing we've learned from this, it's that sometimes the wind does more than just carry dust and errant leaves - it carries intriguing connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. So, let's dig deeper into the data, shall we?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith et al. (2015) in "The Pittsburgh Plume: A Tale of Airborne Adventures" provide a comprehensive overview of the Pittsburgh Plume and its far-reaching effects on air quality in the Ohio region. The study delves into the atmospheric dynamics and the peculiar patterns of the plume, offering a scientific yet captivating narrative that draws readers into the fascinating world of air pollution dispersion. On the other hand, Doe and Jones (2018) explored the intricate process of postmaster appointments in "The Mail Maze: Navigating Postal Placement," shedding light on the often-overlooked intricacies of postal management. While not directly related to air pollution, their work offers valuable insights into the organizational dynamics of the postal system.

Turning to non-fiction books, "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Analysis of Urban Air Quality" by Environmental Research Institute provides a deep dive into the various factors influencing air pollution, including industrial emissions, vehicular traffic, and atmospheric conditions. Meanwhile, "Stamping Through History: A Chronicle of Postal Management" by Postal Pal Chronicles offers a historical account of postal systems and the evolution of postal management practices, which could potentially shed light on the historical context of postmaster placement.

As we venture into the realm of fiction, the novel "A Breath of Suspicion" by Aira Pollution weaves an intriguing tale of mystery and intrigue set against the backdrop of industrial pollution and its impact on a small town, offering a creative exploration of the human experience in the face of environmental challenges. Additionally, "The Postmaster's Predicament" by Maila Mysteries presents a whimsical mystery novel that, while not directly related to air pollution, may offer a lighthearted perspective on the enigmatic world of postal management.

Moreover, our exploration extends to social media, where a tweet by @AirFlowInsights provides a unique anecdotal account of the Pittsburgh Plume's influence on air quality in Ohio, highlighting the everyday experiences of individuals affected by air pollution. Additionally, a post on the Reddit thread "PostalPonderings" offers a thought-provoking discussion on the potential link between air quality and postal operations, sparking online dialogue about the intricacies of our research topic.

Alright, so now we've got a smorgasbord of literary and social media insights at our fingertips. Let's dig into this hodgepodge of perspectives and see what intriguing tidbits we can unearth!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Cincinnati and The number of postmasters in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Perfuming Postmaster Placement: Pittsburgh Plume Predisposes Peculiar Postal Positions

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the perplexing and pungent link between air pollution in Cincinnati, particularly the Pittsburgh Plume effect, and the peculiar postal placement of postmasters in Ohio. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning a period from 2003 to 2022, our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8261575 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This study delves into the winds of change, the breath of fresh air, and the mailstrom of data to offer insights into the unseen forces influencing the postal landscape. Our findings not only provide an intriguing correlation but also serve as a breath of fresh air in the realm of postal research.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The confluence of air pollution and postal management may initially seem as incongruous as trying to mail a package without addressing it. However, our investigation into the relationship between the Pittsburgh Plume effect and the placement of postmasters in Ohio has uncovered a connection that is as intriguing as it is unexpected.
Air pollution, with its invisible tendrils reaching far and wide, has long been a topic of concern for both environmentalists and unfortunate pedestrians alike. The infamous Pittsburgh Plume, with its enigmatic ability to waft its way from Cincinnati to influence the air quality in neighboring regions, has captured the attention of researchers and storytellers alike.
On the other hand, the appointment of postmasters in Ohio may appear as unassuming as an unstamped postcard, but the intricacies of postal placement have a tremendous impact on the effective functioning of the mail system. It is within this seemingly disparate pair of subjects that our research has uncovered an unexpected relationship, one that may hold implications for both environmental policy and postal efficiency.
By heeding the call of curiosity and venturing into unexplored territories of research, we sought to unravel the mystery behind the influence of air pollution, particularly the Pittsburgh Plume, on the number and location of postmasters in Ohio. Drawing on data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on this quest with the hope of shedding light on a phenomenon that has floated under the radar of academic inquiry. As we embarked on our research journey, we faced headwinds of skepticism and raised eyebrows, but we persevered in our pursuit of illuminating insights and unforeseen connections.
Despite the initial skepticism, our findings present a compelling correlation between air pollution levels in Cincinnati, influenced by the Pittsburgh Plume, and the distribution of postmasters in Ohio. The statistical analysis we conducted revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8261575, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, lending robust support to the significance of our findings.
Well, if there's one thing we've learned from this, it's that sometimes the wind does more than just carry dust and errant leaves - it carries intriguing connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. So, let's dig deeper into the data, shall we?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Our research methodology can be likened to untangling a ball of yarn in a hurricane – a bit chaotic, but ultimately enlightening. We embarked on a multidimensional approach, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) to capture the elusive relationship between air pollution in Cincinnati and the number of postmasters in Ohio.

To begin, we harnessed the power of the digital realm, turning to the internet as our trusty information trove. The EPA graciously provided us with comprehensive air quality data, allowing us to dissect the nuances of particulate matter, ozone levels, and other airborne villains. Meanwhile, the BLS served as our guide through the postal landscape, furnishing datasets on postmaster employment and distribution across Ohio. We wrangled with spreadsheets, danced with data visualization tools, and even had a few showdowns with our spreadsheet software – all in the pursuit of knowledge.

With data spanning the years 2003 to 2022, we cast a wide net to capture the ebb and flow of air pollution and postal appointments. Our temporal scope catered to the ever-changing winds of air quality policies, industrial activities, and postal management practices. From the industrial heydays to the digital era, our dataset encapsulated a rich tapestry of environmental fluctuations and bureaucratic maneuvers, providing a panoramic view of the intricate dance between air quality and postal staffing.

Now, here comes the nitty-gritty – statistical analysis. Armed with regression models, correlation coefficients, and p-values, we ventured into the labyrinthine realm of quantitative analysis. We subjected our data to rigorous scrutiny, uncovering the clandestine connections and subtle whispers that eluded casual observation. Our statistical escapade culminated in the revelation of a correlation coefficient of 0.8261575, accompanied by a minuscule p-value of less than 0.01, signaling a resounding validation of our findings.

In essence, our methodology encapsulates the convergence of digital sleuthing, temporal acrobatics, and statistical sorcery, all in the name of unraveling the enigmatic entanglement of air pollution in Cincinnati and the placement of postmasters in Ohio. So, there you have it – a peek behind the curtains of our methodological marvels. Let's just say we've had our fair share of spreadsheet-induced headaches and data-induced epiphanies along the way!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Cincinnati and The number of postmasters in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8261575, r-squared of 0.6825362, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Perfuming Postmaster Placement: Pittsburgh Plume Predisposes Peculiar Postal Positions

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the perplexing and pungent link between air pollution in Cincinnati, particularly the Pittsburgh Plume effect, and the peculiar postal placement of postmasters in Ohio. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning a period from 2003 to 2022, our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8261575 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This study delves into the winds of change, the breath of fresh air, and the mailstrom of data to offer insights into the unseen forces influencing the postal landscape. Our findings not only provide an intriguing correlation but also serve as a breath of fresh air in the realm of postal research.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The confluence of air pollution and postal management may initially seem as incongruous as trying to mail a package without addressing it. However, our investigation into the relationship between the Pittsburgh Plume effect and the placement of postmasters in Ohio has uncovered a connection that is as intriguing as it is unexpected.
Air pollution, with its invisible tendrils reaching far and wide, has long been a topic of concern for both environmentalists and unfortunate pedestrians alike. The infamous Pittsburgh Plume, with its enigmatic ability to waft its way from Cincinnati to influence the air quality in neighboring regions, has captured the attention of researchers and storytellers alike.
On the other hand, the appointment of postmasters in Ohio may appear as unassuming as an unstamped postcard, but the intricacies of postal placement have a tremendous impact on the effective functioning of the mail system. It is within this seemingly disparate pair of subjects that our research has uncovered an unexpected relationship, one that may hold implications for both environmental policy and postal efficiency.
By heeding the call of curiosity and venturing into unexplored territories of research, we sought to unravel the mystery behind the influence of air pollution, particularly the Pittsburgh Plume, on the number and location of postmasters in Ohio. Drawing on data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on this quest with the hope of shedding light on a phenomenon that has floated under the radar of academic inquiry. As we embarked on our research journey, we faced headwinds of skepticism and raised eyebrows, but we persevered in our pursuit of illuminating insights and unforeseen connections.
Despite the initial skepticism, our findings present a compelling correlation between air pollution levels in Cincinnati, influenced by the Pittsburgh Plume, and the distribution of postmasters in Ohio. The statistical analysis we conducted revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8261575, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, lending robust support to the significance of our findings.
Well, if there's one thing we've learned from this, it's that sometimes the wind does more than just carry dust and errant leaves - it carries intriguing connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. So, let's dig deeper into the data, shall we?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected revealed a noteworthy correlation between air pollution in Cincinnati, driven primarily by the Pittsburgh Plume effect, and the distribution of postmasters in Ohio. Our research team, armed with a plethora of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, sought to bring to light the unexpected relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables.

The correlation coefficient of 0.8261575 indicates a strong positive relationship between air pollution levels in Cincinnati and the number of postmasters in Ohio. This association is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.6825362, suggesting that approximately 68.25% of the variance in postmaster placement can be explained by variations in air pollution levels. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence of the statistical significance of this relationship, reinforcing the robustness of our findings.

As Figure 1 depicts, the scatterplot visually captures the pronounced correlation between air pollution and the number of postmasters. The data points align in a manner reminiscent of synchronized swimming, illustrating the harmonious dance between these ostensibly disparate variables. This undeniable association between the Pittsburgh Plume effect and postal placement in Ohio challenges conventional wisdom and invites further inquiry into the mechanisms at play.

While the notion of air pollution shaping postal management may seem as surreal as a stampede in a stationary store, our findings suggest that there may be more than meets the eye in the postal landscape. The winds of change indeed blow in mysterious ways, and in this case, they seem to carry not only particulate matter but also unforeseen connections between environmental factors and administrative decisions.

These results not only emphasize the significance of understanding the broader impacts of air pollution but also highlight the need for interdisciplinary exploration, where the realms of environmental science and postal administration converge in unexpected ways. As we reflect on the implications of this correlation, we are reminded that sometimes, the most valuable treasures are hidden in the unlikeliest of places – or in this case, in the gusts of the Pittsburgh Plume.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Cincinnati and The number of postmasters in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Perfuming Postmaster Placement: Pittsburgh Plume Predisposes Peculiar Postal Positions

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the perplexing and pungent link between air pollution in Cincinnati, particularly the Pittsburgh Plume effect, and the peculiar postal placement of postmasters in Ohio. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning a period from 2003 to 2022, our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8261575 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This study delves into the winds of change, the breath of fresh air, and the mailstrom of data to offer insights into the unseen forces influencing the postal landscape. Our findings not only provide an intriguing correlation but also serve as a breath of fresh air in the realm of postal research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2015) in "The Pittsburgh Plume: A Tale of Airborne Adventures" provide a comprehensive overview of the Pittsburgh Plume and its far-reaching effects on air quality in the Ohio region. The study delves into the atmospheric dynamics and the peculiar patterns of the plume, offering a scientific yet captivating narrative that draws readers into the fascinating world of air pollution dispersion. On the other hand, Doe and Jones (2018) explored the intricate process of postmaster appointments in "The Mail Maze: Navigating Postal Placement," shedding light on the often-overlooked intricacies of postal management. While not directly related to air pollution, their work offers valuable insights into the organizational dynamics of the postal system.
Turning to non-fiction books, "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Analysis of Urban Air Quality" by Environmental Research Institute provides a deep dive into the various factors influencing air pollution, including industrial emissions, vehicular traffic, and atmospheric conditions. Meanwhile, "Stamping Through History: A Chronicle of Postal Management" by Postal Pal Chronicles offers a historical account of postal systems and the evolution of postal management practices, which could potentially shed light on the historical context of postmaster placement.
As we venture into the realm of fiction, the novel "A Breath of Suspicion" by Aira Pollution weaves an intriguing tale of mystery and intrigue set against the backdrop of industrial pollution and its impact on a small town, offering a creative exploration of the human experience in the face of environmental challenges. Additionally, "The Postmaster's Predicament" by Maila Mysteries presents a whimsical mystery novel that, while not directly related to air pollution, may offer a lighthearted perspective on the enigmatic world of postal management.
Moreover, our exploration extends to social media, where a tweet by @AirFlowInsights provides a unique anecdotal account of the Pittsburgh Plume's influence on air quality in Ohio, highlighting the everyday experiences of individuals affected by air pollution. Additionally, a post on the Reddit thread "PostalPonderings" offers a thought-provoking discussion on the potential link between air quality and postal operations, sparking online dialogue about the intricacies of our research topic.
Alright, so now we've got a smorgasbord of literary and social media insights at our fingertips. Let's dig into this hodgepodge of perspectives and see what intriguing tidbits we can unearth!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected revealed a noteworthy correlation between air pollution in Cincinnati, driven primarily by the Pittsburgh Plume effect, and the distribution of postmasters in Ohio. Our research team, armed with a plethora of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, sought to bring to light the unexpected relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8261575 indicates a strong positive relationship between air pollution levels in Cincinnati and the number of postmasters in Ohio. This association is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.6825362, suggesting that approximately 68.25% of the variance in postmaster placement can be explained by variations in air pollution levels. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence of the statistical significance of this relationship, reinforcing the robustness of our findings.
As Figure 1 depicts, the scatterplot visually captures the pronounced correlation between air pollution and the number of postmasters. The data points align in a manner reminiscent of synchronized swimming, illustrating the harmonious dance between these ostensibly disparate variables. This undeniable association between the Pittsburgh Plume effect and postal placement in Ohio challenges conventional wisdom and invites further inquiry into the mechanisms at play.
While the notion of air pollution shaping postal management may seem as surreal as a stampede in a stationary store, our findings suggest that there may be more than meets the eye in the postal landscape. The winds of change indeed blow in mysterious ways, and in this case, they seem to carry not only particulate matter but also unforeseen connections between environmental factors and administrative decisions.
These results not only emphasize the significance of understanding the broader impacts of air pollution but also highlight the need for interdisciplinary exploration, where the realms of environmental science and postal administration converge in unexpected ways. As we reflect on the implications of this correlation, we are reminded that sometimes, the most valuable treasures are hidden in the unlikeliest of places – or in this case, in the gusts of the Pittsburgh Plume.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study unveiled a surprising and robust correlation between air pollution in Cincinnati, particularly driven by the Pittsburgh Plume effect, and the allocation of postmasters in Ohio. This unanticipated connection between atmospheric quality and postal placement has raised eyebrows and piqued the curiosity of researchers and practitioners alike. Our results not only verify the earlier work elucidating the Pittsburgh Plume phenomenon but also align with the whimsical findings recounted in "A Breath of Suspicion" by Aira Pollution, lending credence to the notion that fiction may indeed mirror reality in unexpected ways.

The correlation coefficient of 0.8261575 showcases a strong positive relationship, akin to a steadfast bond between two unlikely companions – much like the unexpected friendship between a kitten and a duck. Meanwhile, the study by Doe and Jones (2018) sheds light on the intricate dynamics of postal placements, perhaps unknowingly laying the foundation for unraveling this intriguing association. The emergence of a r-squared value of 0.6825362 implies that over 68% of the variability in postmaster allocation can be attributed to fluctuations in air pollution, suggesting that the winds of change carry not only unseen particles but also hidden influences on administrative decisions.

The scatterplot, akin to a visual representation of a quirky pas de deux, captures the compelling dance between air pollution and the number of postmasters, inviting imaginative interpretations and whimsical comparisons to the synchronized movements of celestial bodies. The visually striking alignment of data points echoes the unanticipated harmony between these seemingly unrelated variables, propelling us to acknowledge the unforeseen cadence in the postal landscape.

While the notion of air pollution molding the postal management domain may seem as surreal as a postage stamp gaining sentience, our findings reconcile the seemingly incongruent worlds of environmental quality and administrative decisions. The statistical robustness of our results not only reinforces the significance of the Pittsburgh Plume effect but also highlights the unforeseen connections lurking within the postal edifice.

As we gnaw on the intriguing implications of this correlation, we are reminded that academic pursuits are akin to treasure hunts, where the most valuable insights often lie hidden in the unlikeliest of locales – or as our study suggests, amid the gusts of the Pittsburgh Plume.

The whimsical nature of our findings serves as a reminder that the world of research is not devoid of surprises, oftentimes resembling a whimsical journey into the unknown – akin to a mail carrier finding themselves in uncharted territories. Our study engenders an invitation for further exploration of latent connections, urging researchers to peer beneath the surface and embrace the unexpected parallels hidden within the mundane and the enigmatic, not unlike uncovering a hidden treasure amidst a sea of postage stamps.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Cincinnati and The number of postmasters in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Perfuming Postmaster Placement: Pittsburgh Plume Predisposes Peculiar Postal Positions

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the perplexing and pungent link between air pollution in Cincinnati, particularly the Pittsburgh Plume effect, and the peculiar postal placement of postmasters in Ohio. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning a period from 2003 to 2022, our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8261575 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This study delves into the winds of change, the breath of fresh air, and the mailstrom of data to offer insights into the unseen forces influencing the postal landscape. Our findings not only provide an intriguing correlation but also serve as a breath of fresh air in the realm of postal research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The confluence of air pollution and postal management may initially seem as incongruous as trying to mail a package without addressing it. However, our investigation into the relationship between the Pittsburgh Plume effect and the placement of postmasters in Ohio has uncovered a connection that is as intriguing as it is unexpected.
Air pollution, with its invisible tendrils reaching far and wide, has long been a topic of concern for both environmentalists and unfortunate pedestrians alike. The infamous Pittsburgh Plume, with its enigmatic ability to waft its way from Cincinnati to influence the air quality in neighboring regions, has captured the attention of researchers and storytellers alike.
On the other hand, the appointment of postmasters in Ohio may appear as unassuming as an unstamped postcard, but the intricacies of postal placement have a tremendous impact on the effective functioning of the mail system. It is within this seemingly disparate pair of subjects that our research has uncovered an unexpected relationship, one that may hold implications for both environmental policy and postal efficiency.
By heeding the call of curiosity and venturing into unexplored territories of research, we sought to unravel the mystery behind the influence of air pollution, particularly the Pittsburgh Plume, on the number and location of postmasters in Ohio. Drawing on data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on this quest with the hope of shedding light on a phenomenon that has floated under the radar of academic inquiry. As we embarked on our research journey, we faced headwinds of skepticism and raised eyebrows, but we persevered in our pursuit of illuminating insights and unforeseen connections.
Despite the initial skepticism, our findings present a compelling correlation between air pollution levels in Cincinnati, influenced by the Pittsburgh Plume, and the distribution of postmasters in Ohio. The statistical analysis we conducted revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8261575, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, lending robust support to the significance of our findings.
Well, if there's one thing we've learned from this, it's that sometimes the wind does more than just carry dust and errant leaves - it carries intriguing connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. So, let's dig deeper into the data, shall we?

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected revealed a noteworthy correlation between air pollution in Cincinnati, driven primarily by the Pittsburgh Plume effect, and the distribution of postmasters in Ohio. Our research team, armed with a plethora of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, sought to bring to light the unexpected relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8261575 indicates a strong positive relationship between air pollution levels in Cincinnati and the number of postmasters in Ohio. This association is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.6825362, suggesting that approximately 68.25% of the variance in postmaster placement can be explained by variations in air pollution levels. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence of the statistical significance of this relationship, reinforcing the robustness of our findings.
As Figure 1 depicts, the scatterplot visually captures the pronounced correlation between air pollution and the number of postmasters. The data points align in a manner reminiscent of synchronized swimming, illustrating the harmonious dance between these ostensibly disparate variables. This undeniable association between the Pittsburgh Plume effect and postal placement in Ohio challenges conventional wisdom and invites further inquiry into the mechanisms at play.
While the notion of air pollution shaping postal management may seem as surreal as a stampede in a stationary store, our findings suggest that there may be more than meets the eye in the postal landscape. The winds of change indeed blow in mysterious ways, and in this case, they seem to carry not only particulate matter but also unforeseen connections between environmental factors and administrative decisions.
These results not only emphasize the significance of understanding the broader impacts of air pollution but also highlight the need for interdisciplinary exploration, where the realms of environmental science and postal administration converge in unexpected ways. As we reflect on the implications of this correlation, we are reminded that sometimes, the most valuable treasures are hidden in the unlikeliest of places – or in this case, in the gusts of the Pittsburgh Plume.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has illuminated a curious and compelling connection between air pollution in Cincinnati, particularly driven by the Pittsburgh Plume effect, and the placement of postmasters in Ohio. The strength of the correlation coefficient, supported by the robust statistical significance, underscores the unexpected interplay between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings not only contribute to the evolving landscape of environmental and administrative research but also serve as a reminder that there is often more than meets the eye in the intricate web of societal factors.

The implications of our research extend beyond the realm of airy academic intrigue, offering potential insights into the interwoven fabric of environmental influences on administrative decisions. The visual representation of the correlation, akin to synchronized swimming, serves as a whimsical reminder of the harmonious dance between air pollution and postal placement. Who knew that the winds of change could carry not just particulate matter, but also the uncharted territories of unexpected correlations, eh?

As we contemplate the winds of change and the unexpected ways in which they shape our world, it becomes evident that this research opens the door to further exploration and interdisciplinary collaboration. Perhaps there are more connections waiting to be unraveled, like a well-wrapped package in the mail system, just waiting to be discovered.

In light of our findings, it seems that no further research is needed in this area, as we have captured the essence of this peculiar postal perfume. So, it's time to seal this envelope of inquiry and address it to the realm of solved mysteries. And as we sign off this research paper, we do so with the enduring hope that our findings will serve as a breath of fresh air, quite literally, in the world of academic exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Perfuming Postmaster Placement: Pittsburgh Plume Predisposes Peculiar Postal Positions. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Postal Peculiarities


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Perfuming Postmaster Placement: Pittsburgh Plume Predisposes Peculiar Postal Positions. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Esoteric Olfactory Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Perfuming Postmaster Placement: Pittsburgh Plume Predisposes Peculiar Postal Positions with an abstract of This paper investigates the perplexing and pungent link between air pollution in Cincinnati, particularly the Pittsburgh Plume effect, and the peculiar postal placement of postmasters in Ohio. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning a period from 2003 to 2022, our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8261575 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This study delves into the winds of change, the breath of fresh air, and the mailstrom of data to offer insights into the unseen forces influencing the postal landscape. Our findings not only provide an intriguing correlation but also serve as a breath of fresh air in the realm of postal research.

ChatGPT:

Pittsburgh Plume, air pollution, Cincinnati, postal placement, postmaster, Ohio, Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, winds of change, postal landscape, postal research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Cincinnati
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Cincinnati

The number of postmasters in Ohio
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of postmasters and mail superintendents in Ohio
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of postmasters in Ohio

Correlation r = 0.8261575 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6825362 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of postmasters in Ohio) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Cincinnati) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.2E-6. 0.0000071918393899525720000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.00072% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 139,046 random variables You don't actually need 139 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.6, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Cincinnati (Bad air quality days)11.23299.0163917.534211.232919.7269.836074.1095912.328810.13712.56832.465753.561643.01374.918032.465753.561642.465751.912572.191781.64384
The number of postmasters in Ohio (Laborers)990970960970950950900910870850640640500510500490490500470500




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([11.2329,9.01639,17.5342,11.2329,19.726,9.83607,4.10959,12.3288,10.137,12.5683,2.46575,3.56164,3.0137,4.91803,2.46575,3.56164,2.46575,1.91257,2.19178,1.64384,])
array_2 = np.array([990,970,960,970,950,950,900,910,870,850,640,640,500,510,500,490,490,500,470,500,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Cincinnati"
array_2_name = "The number of postmasters in Ohio"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 4887 · Black Variable ID: 20466 · Red Variable ID: 12737
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0