about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,827 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Libertarian Senators in Hawaii and the second variable is Gasoline pumped in Eritrea.  The chart goes from 1994 to 2016, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the saying goes, fewer libertarian votes in Hawaii led to a decrease in gas-ertarian beliefs worldwide. With less support for individual fuel choice, it's no wonder that even the gas situation in Eritrea felt the impact. After all, when it comes to pumping gas, it seems like political ideologies really can fuel the tank!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image showing the interconnectedness of politics and fuel choices. In the foreground, create a low poly scene in Hawaii with a group of people casting their votes for Libertarian senators. The decrease in libertarian votes is represented by fewer people at the voting booths. In the background, construct a low poly depiction of Eritrea with a person pumping gasoline at a local station. The impact of decreased libertarian votes is visualized as a decrease in the amount of gasoline being pumped by the individual. Ensure the interconnectedness of political beliefs and individual fuel choices is conveyed through the simplicity and visual cues of the scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii and Gasoline pumped in Eritrea. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyber folk An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Low poly Brutalism Voxel art
ChatGPT: Low poly

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii and Gasoline pumped in Eritrea, in the following situation: As the saying goes, fewer libertarian votes in Hawaii led to a decrease in gas-ertarian beliefs worldwide. With less support for individual fuel choice, it's no wonder that even the gas situation in Eritrea felt the impact. After all, when it comes to pumping gas, it seems like political ideologies really can fuel the tank!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Hawaii, a group of people are seen casting their votes for Libertarian senators, while in Eritrea, a person is shown pumping gasoline at a local station. The decrease in libertarian votes is symbolized by fewer people at the voting booths, and the impact is shown as a decrease in the amount of gasoline being pumped. The scene conveys the interconnectedness of political beliefs and individual fuel choices.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Low poly ] and depicting this scene: In Hawaii, a group of people are seen casting their votes for Libertarian senators, while in Eritrea, a person is shown pumping gasoline at a local station. The decrease in libertarian votes is symbolized by fewer people at the voting booths, and the impact is shown as a decrease in the amount of gasoline being pumped. The scene conveys the interconnectedness of political beliefs and individual fuel choices. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image showing the interconnectedness of politics and fuel choices. In the foreground, create a low poly scene in Hawaii with a group of people casting their votes for Libertarian senators. The decrease in libertarian votes is represented by fewer people at the voting booths. In the background, construct a low poly depiction of Eritrea with a person pumping gasoline at a local station. The impact of decreased libertarian votes is visualized as a decrease in the amount of gasoline being pumped by the individual. Ensure the interconnectedness of political beliefs and individual fuel choices is conveyed through the simplicity and visual cues of the scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii caused Gasoline pumped in Eritrea to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Aloha to Gasoline Galore: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Hawaii and Gasoline Pumped in Eritrea

The Journal of Quirky Social Science Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii and Gasoline pumped in Eritrea. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8091258 and p < 0.05 for 1994 to 2016.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Aloha to Gasoline Galore: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Hawaii and Gasoline Pumped in Eritrea

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the highly unusual yet surprisingly robust relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in the beautiful paradise of Hawaii and gasoline consumption in the distant land of Eritrea, situated on the Horn of Africa. Utilizing an eclectic mix of data sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team has uncovered a rather intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8091258, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning from 1994 to 2016.

While at first glance, this correlation may seem utterly nonsensical and entirely whimsical, our findings provide substantive evidence for a provocative association that warrants further investigation. As we untangle the enigmatic web of factors at play, one cannot help but marvel at the serendipitous connection between political preferences in Hawaii and the demand for gasoline in Eritrea. So, let us embark on this scholarly adventure with a curious spirit, as we navigate through the tangled vines of data and statistics to unravel this perplexing, yet oddly delightful, relationship.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii and Gasoline pumped in Eritrea. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Aloha to Gasoline Galore: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Hawaii and Gasoline Pumped in Eritrea

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the highly unusual yet surprisingly robust relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in the beautiful paradise of Hawaii and gasoline consumption in the distant land of Eritrea, situated on the Horn of Africa. Utilizing an eclectic mix of data sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team has uncovered a rather intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8091258, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning from 1994 to 2016.

While at first glance, this correlation may seem utterly nonsensical and entirely whimsical, our findings provide substantive evidence for a provocative association that warrants further investigation. As we untangle the enigmatic web of factors at play, one cannot help but marvel at the serendipitous connection between political preferences in Hawaii and the demand for gasoline in Eritrea. So, let us embark on this scholarly adventure with a curious spirit, as we navigate through the tangled vines of data and statistics to unravel this perplexing, yet oddly delightful, relationship.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

At first blush, the political landscape of Hawaii and the fuel habits of Eritrea may seem as incongruous as a pineapple on a pizza. However, our riveting research ventures into uncharted territory to uncover the unexpected link between the libertarian voting preferences in the tropical paradise of Hawaii and the consumption of gasoline in the far-off realm of Eritrea. As we delve into this peculiar correlation, it becomes clear that the association between these seemingly disparate entities is not just a mere mirage in the Hawaiian sun but a statistically robust relationship that demands our attention.

We find ourselves at the crux of a fascinating conundrum, where aloha meets the hum of petrol pumps. The allure of this juxtaposition lies not only in its sheer implausibility but also in the remarkably coherent patterns that emerge from statistical analysis. Imagine, if you will, the vision of a lei-wearing libertarian casting a ballot in the lush greenery of Hawaii somehow influencing the flow of gasoline in the arid expanse of Eritrea. The mind boggles at the sheer whimsy of it. Yet, this whimsy is underpinned by a correlation coefficient that refuses to be dismissed as a mere statistical fluke.

In our academic escapade, we aim to unravel the enigma of this correlation, armed with an arsenal of data and statistical methodologies. As we wade through this tangle of figures and regressions, our goal is not just to elucidate a rather curious connection but also to infuse a sense of scholarly delight in our exploration. After all, in the world of research, serendipity often whispers its secrets in the unlikeliest of places. So, with a sense of wonder and a hint of skepticism, let us embark on a journey that promises to uncover the unexpected dance of libertarian votes and gasoline gazes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii and Gasoline pumped in Eritrea. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Aloha to Gasoline Galore: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Hawaii and Gasoline Pumped in Eritrea

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the highly unusual yet surprisingly robust relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in the beautiful paradise of Hawaii and gasoline consumption in the distant land of Eritrea, situated on the Horn of Africa. Utilizing an eclectic mix of data sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team has uncovered a rather intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8091258, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning from 1994 to 2016.

While at first glance, this correlation may seem utterly nonsensical and entirely whimsical, our findings provide substantive evidence for a provocative association that warrants further investigation. As we untangle the enigmatic web of factors at play, one cannot help but marvel at the serendipitous connection between political preferences in Hawaii and the demand for gasoline in Eritrea. So, let us embark on this scholarly adventure with a curious spirit, as we navigate through the tangled vines of data and statistics to unravel this perplexing, yet oddly delightful, relationship.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
At first blush, the political landscape of Hawaii and the fuel habits of Eritrea may seem as incongruous as a pineapple on a pizza. However, our riveting research ventures into uncharted territory to uncover the unexpected link between the libertarian voting preferences in the tropical paradise of Hawaii and the consumption of gasoline in the far-off realm of Eritrea. As we delve into this peculiar correlation, it becomes clear that the association between these seemingly disparate entities is not just a mere mirage in the Hawaiian sun but a statistically robust relationship that demands our attention.
We find ourselves at the crux of a fascinating conundrum, where aloha meets the hum of petrol pumps. The allure of this juxtaposition lies not only in its sheer implausibility but also in the remarkably coherent patterns that emerge from statistical analysis. Imagine, if you will, the vision of a lei-wearing libertarian casting a ballot in the lush greenery of Hawaii somehow influencing the flow of gasoline in the arid expanse of Eritrea. The mind boggles at the sheer whimsy of it. Yet, this whimsy is underpinned by a correlation coefficient that refuses to be dismissed as a mere statistical fluke.
In our academic escapade, we aim to unravel the enigma of this correlation, armed with an arsenal of data and statistical methodologies. As we wade through this tangle of figures and regressions, our goal is not just to elucidate a rather curious connection but also to infuse a sense of scholarly delight in our exploration. After all, in the world of research, serendipity often whispers its secrets in the unlikeliest of places. So, with a sense of wonder and a hint of skepticism, let us embark on a journey that promises to uncover the unexpected dance of libertarian votes and gasoline gazes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Political Landscape of Hawaii: An Analysis of Libertarian Voting Preferences and Their Impact on Local Policies," Smith et al. delve into the intricate dynamics of political leanings in Hawaii. The authors find that the libertarian ideology holds a not insignificant sway in the state's voting patterns, with a particular penchant for issues of individual liberty and minimal government intervention. Meanwhile, in "Fueling the Future: A Comprehensive Study of Gasoline Consumption in Eritrea," Doe and Jones uncover the various determinants of gasoline demand in Eritrea, shedding light on the socio-economic factors shaping the country's fuel consumption landscape.

Beyond these sober investigations lie broader literary treasures that, although not directly related to our curious correlation, provide valuable context and inspiration. "Hawaiian History: A Journey Through Paradise" and "Eritrea: A Land of Contrasts" offer nuanced portrayals of the cultural and geographical aspects of these two distinct locales, illuminating the backdrop against which our improbable association unfolds. Fictional works such as "The Puzzling Pineapple: A Tale of Mysteries and Miracles" and "Aloha, Eritrea!" infuse elements of whimsy and imagination, although speculative, hinting perhaps at the fantastical forces at play in our scholarly pursuit.

As we venture further into the realm of eclectic influences, let us not dismiss the lighthearted yet insightful musings of children's media. The animated series "Hula Hoopsters" and the educational show "Eritrea Explorers" may not offer empirical evidence, but their thematic resonance with our study's locales kindles a sense of jovial intrigue. And who knows, in the whimsical world of correlations, the unexpected might just be lurking in the unlikeliest of places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii and Gasoline pumped in Eritrea. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1994 to 2016

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Aloha to Gasoline Galore: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Hawaii and Gasoline Pumped in Eritrea

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the highly unusual yet surprisingly robust relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in the beautiful paradise of Hawaii and gasoline consumption in the distant land of Eritrea, situated on the Horn of Africa. Utilizing an eclectic mix of data sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team has uncovered a rather intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8091258, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning from 1994 to 2016.

While at first glance, this correlation may seem utterly nonsensical and entirely whimsical, our findings provide substantive evidence for a provocative association that warrants further investigation. As we untangle the enigmatic web of factors at play, one cannot help but marvel at the serendipitous connection between political preferences in Hawaii and the demand for gasoline in Eritrea. So, let us embark on this scholarly adventure with a curious spirit, as we navigate through the tangled vines of data and statistics to unravel this perplexing, yet oddly delightful, relationship.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
At first blush, the political landscape of Hawaii and the fuel habits of Eritrea may seem as incongruous as a pineapple on a pizza. However, our riveting research ventures into uncharted territory to uncover the unexpected link between the libertarian voting preferences in the tropical paradise of Hawaii and the consumption of gasoline in the far-off realm of Eritrea. As we delve into this peculiar correlation, it becomes clear that the association between these seemingly disparate entities is not just a mere mirage in the Hawaiian sun but a statistically robust relationship that demands our attention.
We find ourselves at the crux of a fascinating conundrum, where aloha meets the hum of petrol pumps. The allure of this juxtaposition lies not only in its sheer implausibility but also in the remarkably coherent patterns that emerge from statistical analysis. Imagine, if you will, the vision of a lei-wearing libertarian casting a ballot in the lush greenery of Hawaii somehow influencing the flow of gasoline in the arid expanse of Eritrea. The mind boggles at the sheer whimsy of it. Yet, this whimsy is underpinned by a correlation coefficient that refuses to be dismissed as a mere statistical fluke.
In our academic escapade, we aim to unravel the enigma of this correlation, armed with an arsenal of data and statistical methodologies. As we wade through this tangle of figures and regressions, our goal is not just to elucidate a rather curious connection but also to infuse a sense of scholarly delight in our exploration. After all, in the world of research, serendipity often whispers its secrets in the unlikeliest of places. So, with a sense of wonder and a hint of skepticism, let us embark on a journey that promises to uncover the unexpected dance of libertarian votes and gasoline gazes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection

Our research team embarked on a virtual expedition across the vast expanse of the internet, much like scholarly Indiana Joneses in pursuit of arcane academic treasures. After carefully traversing the perilous domains of scholarly repositories and data archives, we managed to unearth a trove of information to satiate our curious minds. The primary sources of data were the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, where we diligently traced the labyrinthine paths of political preferences in Hawaii, and the Harvard Dataverse, where we delved into the entrancing depths of gasoline consumption in Eritrea. As researchers with a sense of humor, we also channeled our inner Sherlock Holmes, engaging in detective work on the Energy Information Administration website to uncover the clandestine gasoline consumption figures.

Data Processing

Upon procuring these datasets, our scholarly pursuit transitioned from sleuthing to data wrangling. We used a combination of statistical software and the magical powers of Excel (with a dash of fairy dust for good luck) to harmonize the disparate data and coax them into revealing their underlying patterns. Through a process akin to coaxing an elusive genie out of a lamp, we meticulously massaged, cleaned, and validated the data to ensure its reliability and integrity. A touch of statistical wizardry, involving mesmerizing arrays of formulas and functions, was employed to mold the raw data into pliable forms suitable for analysis.

Statistical Analysis

Armed with our trusty statistical tools and an unyielding determination to unravel this enigmatic correlation, we set forth on a valiant quest to tame the wild numbers. We invoked the spirits of regression analysis, unleashing their formidable powers to ascertain the strength and direction of the relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii and gasoline consumption in Eritrea. The dance of correlation coefficients and p-values ensued, with our scholarly gaze fixed upon the cryptic indicators of statistical significance.

Time Frame

Our odyssey through the digital archives and statistical landscapes spanned the timeline from 1994 to 2016, a period marked by political upheavals and fluctuations in global gasoline demand. This temporal expanse allowed us to capture the dynamic interplay between libertarian voting preferences in Hawaii and the ethereal tendrils of gasoline consumption in Eritrea.

Ethical Considerations

With a nod to academic propriety and the ethical code of research conduct, our data collection and analysis adhered to the principles of integrity and transparency. No data points were harmed in the making of this study, and all statistical instruments were wielded with the utmost respect for their intrinsic properties.

In sum, our methodological approach, though at times beset with scholarly lightheartedness, maintained the rigor and discipline required to discern the peculiar linkage between libertarian votes in Hawaii and gasoline gazes in Eritrea. This comprehensive methodology underpins the reliability and robustness of our findings, paving the way for further academic explorations into the unexpected intersections of political preferences and global fuel dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii and Gasoline pumped in Eritrea. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1994 to 2016, you found a correlation 0.8091258, r-squared of 0.6546845, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Aloha to Gasoline Galore: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Hawaii and Gasoline Pumped in Eritrea

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the highly unusual yet surprisingly robust relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in the beautiful paradise of Hawaii and gasoline consumption in the distant land of Eritrea, situated on the Horn of Africa. Utilizing an eclectic mix of data sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team has uncovered a rather intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8091258, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning from 1994 to 2016.

While at first glance, this correlation may seem utterly nonsensical and entirely whimsical, our findings provide substantive evidence for a provocative association that warrants further investigation. As we untangle the enigmatic web of factors at play, one cannot help but marvel at the serendipitous connection between political preferences in Hawaii and the demand for gasoline in Eritrea. So, let us embark on this scholarly adventure with a curious spirit, as we navigate through the tangled vines of data and statistics to unravel this perplexing, yet oddly delightful, relationship.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
At first blush, the political landscape of Hawaii and the fuel habits of Eritrea may seem as incongruous as a pineapple on a pizza. However, our riveting research ventures into uncharted territory to uncover the unexpected link between the libertarian voting preferences in the tropical paradise of Hawaii and the consumption of gasoline in the far-off realm of Eritrea. As we delve into this peculiar correlation, it becomes clear that the association between these seemingly disparate entities is not just a mere mirage in the Hawaiian sun but a statistically robust relationship that demands our attention.
We find ourselves at the crux of a fascinating conundrum, where aloha meets the hum of petrol pumps. The allure of this juxtaposition lies not only in its sheer implausibility but also in the remarkably coherent patterns that emerge from statistical analysis. Imagine, if you will, the vision of a lei-wearing libertarian casting a ballot in the lush greenery of Hawaii somehow influencing the flow of gasoline in the arid expanse of Eritrea. The mind boggles at the sheer whimsy of it. Yet, this whimsy is underpinned by a correlation coefficient that refuses to be dismissed as a mere statistical fluke.
In our academic escapade, we aim to unravel the enigma of this correlation, armed with an arsenal of data and statistical methodologies. As we wade through this tangle of figures and regressions, our goal is not just to elucidate a rather curious connection but also to infuse a sense of scholarly delight in our exploration. After all, in the world of research, serendipity often whispers its secrets in the unlikeliest of places. So, with a sense of wonder and a hint of skepticism, let us embark on a journey that promises to uncover the unexpected dance of libertarian votes and gasoline gazes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii and gasoline pumped in Eritrea, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8091258. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6546845 suggests that approximately 65.47% of the variability in gasoline consumption in Eritrea can be explained by the Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii. These results were found to be statistically significant, with a p-value of less than 0.05, further underlining the robustness of the observed relationship.

Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot displaying the strong positive correlation between the two variables, visually reinforcing the statistical findings. The upward trend in the scatterplot reflects the intriguing link between Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii and gasoline consumption in Eritrea, providing a compelling visual representation of our quantitative analysis.

The highly unexpected nature of this correlation cannot be overstated, and it opens the door to a myriad of speculative interpretations. As we grapple with the implications of these findings, we are reminded of the unpredictability and complexity that often characterizes the interplay of political dynamics and global economic trends. This unanticipated connection between seemingly disparate geographic and socio-political entities serves as a captivating reminder of the enigmatic ways in which intercontinental influences can manifest.

In unraveling this delightfully perplexing relationship, we not only shed light on the statistical coherence of the association but also invite further exploration into the underlying mechanisms at play. The Senate race in Hawaii takes on a new dimension as we contemplate its potential ripple effects on gasoline consumption in the distant land of Eritrea. With each vote cast in the balmy breezes of Hawaii, could there be a faint echo reverberating across the oceans to impact the fuel preferences in Eritrea? This question beckons us to delve deeper into the realms of political economy and global interconnectedness, reminding us of the inherent unpredictability that often pervades the empirical landscape.

The zany nature of this correlation leaves us both bemused and intrigued, prompting a reevaluation of the seemingly peculiar relationships that underpin global interactions. The unexpected convergence of libertarian political leanings and gasoline demand in Hawaii and Eritrea, respectively, offers a window into the unexplored avenues of socio-political influence. Our inquiry into this whimsical correlation serves as a testament to the serendipitous discoveries that await those who dare to unravel the mysteries of data-driven research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii and Gasoline pumped in Eritrea. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Aloha to Gasoline Galore: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Hawaii and Gasoline Pumped in Eritrea

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the highly unusual yet surprisingly robust relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in the beautiful paradise of Hawaii and gasoline consumption in the distant land of Eritrea, situated on the Horn of Africa. Utilizing an eclectic mix of data sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team has uncovered a rather intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8091258, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning from 1994 to 2016.

While at first glance, this correlation may seem utterly nonsensical and entirely whimsical, our findings provide substantive evidence for a provocative association that warrants further investigation. As we untangle the enigmatic web of factors at play, one cannot help but marvel at the serendipitous connection between political preferences in Hawaii and the demand for gasoline in Eritrea. So, let us embark on this scholarly adventure with a curious spirit, as we navigate through the tangled vines of data and statistics to unravel this perplexing, yet oddly delightful, relationship.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Political Landscape of Hawaii: An Analysis of Libertarian Voting Preferences and Their Impact on Local Policies," Smith et al. delve into the intricate dynamics of political leanings in Hawaii. The authors find that the libertarian ideology holds a not insignificant sway in the state's voting patterns, with a particular penchant for issues of individual liberty and minimal government intervention. Meanwhile, in "Fueling the Future: A Comprehensive Study of Gasoline Consumption in Eritrea," Doe and Jones uncover the various determinants of gasoline demand in Eritrea, shedding light on the socio-economic factors shaping the country's fuel consumption landscape.
Beyond these sober investigations lie broader literary treasures that, although not directly related to our curious correlation, provide valuable context and inspiration. "Hawaiian History: A Journey Through Paradise" and "Eritrea: A Land of Contrasts" offer nuanced portrayals of the cultural and geographical aspects of these two distinct locales, illuminating the backdrop against which our improbable association unfolds. Fictional works such as "The Puzzling Pineapple: A Tale of Mysteries and Miracles" and "Aloha, Eritrea!" infuse elements of whimsy and imagination, although speculative, hinting perhaps at the fantastical forces at play in our scholarly pursuit.
As we venture further into the realm of eclectic influences, let us not dismiss the lighthearted yet insightful musings of children's media. The animated series "Hula Hoopsters" and the educational show "Eritrea Explorers" may not offer empirical evidence, but their thematic resonance with our study's locales kindles a sense of jovial intrigue. And who knows, in the whimsical world of correlations, the unexpected might just be lurking in the unlikeliest of places.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii and gasoline pumped in Eritrea, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8091258. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6546845 suggests that approximately 65.47% of the variability in gasoline consumption in Eritrea can be explained by the Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii. These results were found to be statistically significant, with a p-value of less than 0.05, further underlining the robustness of the observed relationship.
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot displaying the strong positive correlation between the two variables, visually reinforcing the statistical findings. The upward trend in the scatterplot reflects the intriguing link between Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii and gasoline consumption in Eritrea, providing a compelling visual representation of our quantitative analysis.
The highly unexpected nature of this correlation cannot be overstated, and it opens the door to a myriad of speculative interpretations. As we grapple with the implications of these findings, we are reminded of the unpredictability and complexity that often characterizes the interplay of political dynamics and global economic trends. This unanticipated connection between seemingly disparate geographic and socio-political entities serves as a captivating reminder of the enigmatic ways in which intercontinental influences can manifest.
In unraveling this delightfully perplexing relationship, we not only shed light on the statistical coherence of the association but also invite further exploration into the underlying mechanisms at play. The Senate race in Hawaii takes on a new dimension as we contemplate its potential ripple effects on gasoline consumption in the distant land of Eritrea. With each vote cast in the balmy breezes of Hawaii, could there be a faint echo reverberating across the oceans to impact the fuel preferences in Eritrea? This question beckons us to delve deeper into the realms of political economy and global interconnectedness, reminding us of the inherent unpredictability that often pervades the empirical landscape.
The zany nature of this correlation leaves us both bemused and intrigued, prompting a reevaluation of the seemingly peculiar relationships that underpin global interactions. The unexpected convergence of libertarian political leanings and gasoline demand in Hawaii and Eritrea, respectively, offers a window into the unexplored avenues of socio-political influence. Our inquiry into this whimsical correlation serves as a testament to the serendipitous discoveries that await those who dare to unravel the mysteries of data-driven research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The discovery of a robust correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii and gasoline pumped in Eritrea serves as a fascinating expedition into the realm of unexpected statistical relationships. Much like stumbling upon a pineapple plantation in the arid expanse of Eritrea, the uncovering of this correlation deftly melds surprise with curiosity. Our findings not only align with prior research on political leanings in Hawaii but also corroborate the determinants of gasoline demand in Eritrea, anchoring the whimsical within the empirical.

Smith et al.'s investigation into the political landscape of Hawaii provided a beacon of insight into the significant sway of libertarian ideology in the state's voting patterns. It laid the groundwork for our study by establishing the presence of libertarian leanings in Hawaii, setting the stage for an exploration into its unforeseen reverberations across oceans and continents. Similarly, Doe and Jones' comprehensive study of gasoline consumption in Eritrea offered a lens through which to discern the socio-economic underpinnings of the country's fuel demand, bolstering the foundation of our unlikely correlation. The combination of these seemingly disparate scholarly pursuits illuminates the intricate web of influences that culminate in the unexpected harmony between Hawaiian political preferences and Eritrean fuel consumption.

Additionally, the tangentially related literary and broadcast works highlighted in the literature review lent a sense of whimsy and imagination to our research, hinting at the possibility of fantastical forces at play. While seemingly whimsical, these offbeat references infuse a sense of lighthearted intrigue into the scholarly discourse, serving as a quirky reminder of the unexpected lurking in the unlikeliest of places. In a manner reminiscent of uncovering a serendipitous pineapple amidst the bustling markets of Eritrea, our exploration into eclectic influences takes on a delightful tinge of unpredictability.

The compelling correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value observed in our analysis underscore the robustness of the association between Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii and gasoline consumption in Eritrea. Our findings not only align with prior research on political leanings in Hawaii but also support the determinants of gasoline demand in Eritrea, enlivening the empirical landscape with an unexpected strand of coherence. As we grapple with the implications of these findings, we are reminded of the unpredictability that often characterizes global interconnectedness, prompting playful speculation and introspection.

The zany nature of this correlation invites us to contemplate the unsuspecting ways in which geographic and socio-political entities can intersect, reminding us of the delightful oddities that pepper the often serious realm of research. Our scholarly endeavor serves as a testament to the whimsical discoveries that await those who dare to untangle the enigmatic web of statistical relationships, urging us to embrace the unexpected complexities that underpin the empirical landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii and Gasoline pumped in Eritrea. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Aloha to Gasoline Galore: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Hawaii and Gasoline Pumped in Eritrea

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the highly unusual yet surprisingly robust relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in the beautiful paradise of Hawaii and gasoline consumption in the distant land of Eritrea, situated on the Horn of Africa. Utilizing an eclectic mix of data sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team has uncovered a rather intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8091258, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning from 1994 to 2016.

While at first glance, this correlation may seem utterly nonsensical and entirely whimsical, our findings provide substantive evidence for a provocative association that warrants further investigation. As we untangle the enigmatic web of factors at play, one cannot help but marvel at the serendipitous connection between political preferences in Hawaii and the demand for gasoline in Eritrea. So, let us embark on this scholarly adventure with a curious spirit, as we navigate through the tangled vines of data and statistics to unravel this perplexing, yet oddly delightful, relationship.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
At first blush, the political landscape of Hawaii and the fuel habits of Eritrea may seem as incongruous as a pineapple on a pizza. However, our riveting research ventures into uncharted territory to uncover the unexpected link between the libertarian voting preferences in the tropical paradise of Hawaii and the consumption of gasoline in the far-off realm of Eritrea. As we delve into this peculiar correlation, it becomes clear that the association between these seemingly disparate entities is not just a mere mirage in the Hawaiian sun but a statistically robust relationship that demands our attention.
We find ourselves at the crux of a fascinating conundrum, where aloha meets the hum of petrol pumps. The allure of this juxtaposition lies not only in its sheer implausibility but also in the remarkably coherent patterns that emerge from statistical analysis. Imagine, if you will, the vision of a lei-wearing libertarian casting a ballot in the lush greenery of Hawaii somehow influencing the flow of gasoline in the arid expanse of Eritrea. The mind boggles at the sheer whimsy of it. Yet, this whimsy is underpinned by a correlation coefficient that refuses to be dismissed as a mere statistical fluke.
In our academic escapade, we aim to unravel the enigma of this correlation, armed with an arsenal of data and statistical methodologies. As we wade through this tangle of figures and regressions, our goal is not just to elucidate a rather curious connection but also to infuse a sense of scholarly delight in our exploration. After all, in the world of research, serendipity often whispers its secrets in the unlikeliest of places. So, with a sense of wonder and a hint of skepticism, let us embark on a journey that promises to uncover the unexpected dance of libertarian votes and gasoline gazes.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii and gasoline pumped in Eritrea, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8091258. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6546845 suggests that approximately 65.47% of the variability in gasoline consumption in Eritrea can be explained by the Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii. These results were found to be statistically significant, with a p-value of less than 0.05, further underlining the robustness of the observed relationship.
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot displaying the strong positive correlation between the two variables, visually reinforcing the statistical findings. The upward trend in the scatterplot reflects the intriguing link between Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii and gasoline consumption in Eritrea, providing a compelling visual representation of our quantitative analysis.
The highly unexpected nature of this correlation cannot be overstated, and it opens the door to a myriad of speculative interpretations. As we grapple with the implications of these findings, we are reminded of the unpredictability and complexity that often characterizes the interplay of political dynamics and global economic trends. This unanticipated connection between seemingly disparate geographic and socio-political entities serves as a captivating reminder of the enigmatic ways in which intercontinental influences can manifest.
In unraveling this delightfully perplexing relationship, we not only shed light on the statistical coherence of the association but also invite further exploration into the underlying mechanisms at play. The Senate race in Hawaii takes on a new dimension as we contemplate its potential ripple effects on gasoline consumption in the distant land of Eritrea. With each vote cast in the balmy breezes of Hawaii, could there be a faint echo reverberating across the oceans to impact the fuel preferences in Eritrea? This question beckons us to delve deeper into the realms of political economy and global interconnectedness, reminding us of the inherent unpredictability that often pervades the empirical landscape.
The zany nature of this correlation leaves us both bemused and intrigued, prompting a reevaluation of the seemingly peculiar relationships that underpin global interactions. The unexpected convergence of libertarian political leanings and gasoline demand in Hawaii and Eritrea, respectively, offers a window into the unexplored avenues of socio-political influence. Our inquiry into this whimsical correlation serves as a testament to the serendipitous discoveries that await those who dare to unravel the mysteries of data-driven research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the seemingly incongruous correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Hawaii and gasoline consumption in Eritrea has unearthed a genuinely puzzling yet robust relationship. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8091258, alongside the visually compelling scatterplot, underscores the unexpected nature of this association. While at first glance, the notion of a lei-wearing libertarian swaying global gasoline demand might appear as whimsical as a misplaced coconut in a desert, our findings compel us to ponder the intricate interplay of political dynamics and international economic trends.

As we wrap up this scholarly escapade, it is tempting to revel in the quirky allure of this correlation, akin to stumbling upon a pineapple farm in the Sahara. However, the implications of our results beckon us to a deeper reflection on the interconnectedness of global phenomena. The tantalizing prospect of political preferences in a Pacific paradise resonating across oceans to influence fuel habits in a distant African nation challenges our conventional notions of socio-political influence.

Yet, as we bid adieu to this utterly idiosyncratic correlation, we cannot help but marvel at the capricious nature of empirical relationships that defy simplistic explanations, affirming the adage that truth can be stranger than fiction. Nevertheless, firmly tethered to the tenets of scientific inquiry, we assert that no further research in this peculiar association is warranted, lest we tumble further down the rabbit hole of whimsy and wonder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Aloha to Gasoline Galore: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Hawaii and Gasoline Pumped in Eritrea. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Social Science Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Aloha to Gasoline Galore: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Hawaii and Gasoline Pumped in Eritrea. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Foundation for International Energy Analysis and Political Science


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Aloha to Gasoline Galore: Exploring the Curious Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Hawaii and Gasoline Pumped in Eritrea with an abstract of This paper delves into the highly unusual yet surprisingly robust relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in the beautiful paradise of Hawaii and gasoline consumption in the distant land of Eritrea, situated on the Horn of Africa. Utilizing an eclectic mix of data sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team has uncovered a rather intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8091258, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning from 1994 to 2016.
While at first glance, this correlation may seem utterly nonsensical and entirely whimsical, our findings provide substantive evidence for a provocative association that warrants further investigation. As we untangle the enigmatic web of factors at play, one cannot help but marvel at the serendipitous connection between political preferences in Hawaii and the demand for gasoline in Eritrea. So, let us embark on this scholarly adventure with a curious spirit, as we navigate through the tangled vines of data and statistics to unravel this perplexing, yet oddly delightful, relationship.

ChatGPT:

libertarian votes Hawaii, gasoline consumption Eritrea, correlation coefficient, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Energy Information Administration, political preferences Hawaii, gasoline demand Eritrea

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Libertarian Senators in Hawaii
Detailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Libertarian Senate candidates in Hawaii
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Libertarian Senators in Hawaii

Gasoline pumped in Eritrea
Detailed data title: Volume of gasoline pumped consumed in Eritrea in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Gasoline pumped in Eritrea

Correlation r = 0.8091258 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6546845 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 65.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Gasoline pumped in Eritrea) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Libertarian Senators in Hawaii) over the 8 years from 1994 through 2016.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.015. 0.0149914937409364790000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.81 in 1.5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 67 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.24, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19941998200020042006201020142016
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Hawaii (Total votes)1439311908312752776415295789416809
Gasoline pumped in Eritrea (Million Barrels/Day)1.41.80.3262840.2563660.1168490.2103290.2570680.23306




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([14393,11908,3127,5277,6415,2957,8941,6809,])
array_2 = np.array([1.4,1.8,0.326284,0.256366,0.116849,0.210329,0.257068,0.23306,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Libertarian Senators in Hawaii"
array_2_name = "Gasoline pumped in Eritrea"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 4827 · Black Variable ID: 26226 · Red Variable ID: 24388
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0