about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,736 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Republican Senators in Virginia and the second variable is Popularity of the 'like a boss' meme.  The chart goes from 2006 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more Republican Senators were elected, the overall level of 'bossiness' in the state rose. This created a like-a-boss-friendly environment, leading to a surge in the popularity of the meme.

Create a meme inspired by the like a boss meme that in some way references Republican votes for Senators in Virginia. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Republican votes for Senators in Virginia caused Popularity of the 'like a boss' meme to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Revealing the Relationship Between Republican Votes for Senators in Virginia and the Popularity of the 'Like a Boss' Meme

Journal of Political Psychology and Internet Culture

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and Popularity of the 'like a boss' meme. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8776837 and p < 0.05 for 2006 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Revealing the Relationship Between Republican Votes for Senators in Virginia and the Popularity of the 'Like a Boss' Meme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the mysterious link between the political choices of Virginian voters and the virality of the 'like a boss' meme, employing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends. The correlation coefficient of 0.8776837 and p < 0.05 for the period from 2006 to 2020 suggests a compelling association, much like the unsuspected pairing of peanut butter and pickles – perplexing at first, yet oddly complementary. We delve into the intricacies underlying this correlation, exploring the potential influence of cultural zeitgeist on political behavior, and pondering whether political memes might just be the new campaigners' secret sauce. Our findings not only shed light on the surprising interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena, but also add a touch of whimsy to the otherwise solemn field of political research, akin to a clown performing at a black-tie event.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and Popularity of the 'like a boss' meme. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Revealing the Relationship Between Republican Votes for Senators in Virginia and the Popularity of the 'Like a Boss' Meme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the mysterious link between the political choices of Virginian voters and the virality of the 'like a boss' meme, employing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends. The correlation coefficient of 0.8776837 and p < 0.05 for the period from 2006 to 2020 suggests a compelling association, much like the unsuspected pairing of peanut butter and pickles – perplexing at first, yet oddly complementary. We delve into the intricacies underlying this correlation, exploring the potential influence of cultural zeitgeist on political behavior, and pondering whether political memes might just be the new campaigners' secret sauce. Our findings not only shed light on the surprising interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena, but also add a touch of whimsy to the otherwise solemn field of political research, akin to a clown performing at a black-tie event.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The enigmatic world of politics and the ever-evolving landscape of internet memes may appear to be as disconnected as a moose in a muffin factory. However, our research seeks to unearth the hidden threads that weave these seemingly unrelated realms together. The compelling correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and the burgeoning popularity of the 'like a boss' meme has sparked our curiosity and led us down a rabbit hole of data analysis and speculation. It's as if we stumbled upon a treasure map in a sea of cat videos – unexpected, yet undeniably intriguing.

While the 'like a boss' meme has permeated the digital sphere like an unstoppable force of nature, the rationality behind its correlation with Republican votes for Senators in Virginia may initially seem as perplexing as a penguin trying to navigate a desert. However, as we dig deeper, we aim to unravel this mystery and bring to light the underlying factors that connect these disparate entities.

As we embark on this research journey, we are reminded of the unassuming alliance of coffee and doughnuts – an unlikely pairing that somehow just works. In a similar vein, our investigation intertwines the serious realm of political analysis with the light-hearted, often surreal world of internet memes, adding a dash of whimsy to the otherwise somber landscape of academic inquiry. After all, who says academia can't have a sense of humor? It's like finding a unicorn in a library – unexpected, yet undeniably delightful.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and Popularity of the 'like a boss' meme. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Revealing the Relationship Between Republican Votes for Senators in Virginia and the Popularity of the 'Like a Boss' Meme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the mysterious link between the political choices of Virginian voters and the virality of the 'like a boss' meme, employing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends. The correlation coefficient of 0.8776837 and p < 0.05 for the period from 2006 to 2020 suggests a compelling association, much like the unsuspected pairing of peanut butter and pickles – perplexing at first, yet oddly complementary. We delve into the intricacies underlying this correlation, exploring the potential influence of cultural zeitgeist on political behavior, and pondering whether political memes might just be the new campaigners' secret sauce. Our findings not only shed light on the surprising interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena, but also add a touch of whimsy to the otherwise solemn field of political research, akin to a clown performing at a black-tie event.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enigmatic world of politics and the ever-evolving landscape of internet memes may appear to be as disconnected as a moose in a muffin factory. However, our research seeks to unearth the hidden threads that weave these seemingly unrelated realms together. The compelling correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and the burgeoning popularity of the 'like a boss' meme has sparked our curiosity and led us down a rabbit hole of data analysis and speculation. It's as if we stumbled upon a treasure map in a sea of cat videos – unexpected, yet undeniably intriguing.
While the 'like a boss' meme has permeated the digital sphere like an unstoppable force of nature, the rationality behind its correlation with Republican votes for Senators in Virginia may initially seem as perplexing as a penguin trying to navigate a desert. However, as we dig deeper, we aim to unravel this mystery and bring to light the underlying factors that connect these disparate entities.
As we embark on this research journey, we are reminded of the unassuming alliance of coffee and doughnuts – an unlikely pairing that somehow just works. In a similar vein, our investigation intertwines the serious realm of political analysis with the light-hearted, often surreal world of internet memes, adding a dash of whimsy to the otherwise somber landscape of academic inquiry. After all, who says academia can't have a sense of humor? It's like finding a unicorn in a library – unexpected, yet undeniably delightful.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

As we set out to explore the curious connection between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and the meteoric rise of the 'like a boss' meme, we find ourselves drawing from a myriad of studies and sources that shed light on the unexpected interplay between political behavior and internet culture. To our surprise, the links we uncovered in our investigation were as perplexing as a cat trying to understand quantum physics, yet undeniably captivating.

Smith and Doe (2015) examined the influence of online memes on political engagement and found that humorous internet content has the potential to shape public opinion in subtle yet impactful ways. Further adding to this notion, Jones (2018) explored the crossover between social media phenomena and political affiliations, highlighting the potential for memes to resonate with specific demographics. While these studies set the stage for our research, they merely scratched the surface of the enigmatic relationship we sought to unravel.

Beyond the confines of scholarly works, our quest for understanding led us down unexpected avenues, akin to stumbling upon a leprechaun's pot of gold at the end of a rainbow. Books such as "The Power of Memes: Harnessing Internet Culture for Political Advantage" (Johnson, 2020) and "Digital Democracy: Navigating the Intersection of Politics and Social Media" (Garcia, 2019) provided insightful perspectives on the fusion of internet culture and political discourse, offering valuable context for our exploration.

As we delved deeper into the labyrinthine realm of interconnectedness, we ventured into the realm of fiction – a domain that often mirrors and interprets societal phenomena in unexpected ways. Works such as "Meme Wars: The Battle for Online Supremacy" (Fictional Author, 2017) and "The Politician's Dilemma: A Memeworthy Mystery" (Fictional Author, 2018) whimsically danced on the periphery of our research, serving as a delightful departure from traditional academic discourse.

Moreover, we couldn't overlook the significant influence of childhood influences, as cartoons and children's shows have long been purveyors of societal commentary in disguise. Shows like "Phineas and Ferb" and "SpongeBob SquarePants" subtly introduced young viewers to the nuances of creativity and absurdity, a parallel that seemed oddly fitting to our exploration of political memes and voter behavior. It's as if we stumbled upon a treasure chest of nostalgia in a sea of data analysis – a delightful surprise, reminiscent of discovering an old comic book in the attic.

With these diverse and unconventional sources in mind, we journey forth to uncover the underlying mechanisms that tie together the unexpected duo of political votes and internet memes, armed with a sense of wonder and a pinch of whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and Popularity of the 'like a boss' meme. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends . You used data from 2006 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Revealing the Relationship Between Republican Votes for Senators in Virginia and the Popularity of the 'Like a Boss' Meme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the mysterious link between the political choices of Virginian voters and the virality of the 'like a boss' meme, employing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends. The correlation coefficient of 0.8776837 and p < 0.05 for the period from 2006 to 2020 suggests a compelling association, much like the unsuspected pairing of peanut butter and pickles – perplexing at first, yet oddly complementary. We delve into the intricacies underlying this correlation, exploring the potential influence of cultural zeitgeist on political behavior, and pondering whether political memes might just be the new campaigners' secret sauce. Our findings not only shed light on the surprising interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena, but also add a touch of whimsy to the otherwise solemn field of political research, akin to a clown performing at a black-tie event.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enigmatic world of politics and the ever-evolving landscape of internet memes may appear to be as disconnected as a moose in a muffin factory. However, our research seeks to unearth the hidden threads that weave these seemingly unrelated realms together. The compelling correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and the burgeoning popularity of the 'like a boss' meme has sparked our curiosity and led us down a rabbit hole of data analysis and speculation. It's as if we stumbled upon a treasure map in a sea of cat videos – unexpected, yet undeniably intriguing.
While the 'like a boss' meme has permeated the digital sphere like an unstoppable force of nature, the rationality behind its correlation with Republican votes for Senators in Virginia may initially seem as perplexing as a penguin trying to navigate a desert. However, as we dig deeper, we aim to unravel this mystery and bring to light the underlying factors that connect these disparate entities.
As we embark on this research journey, we are reminded of the unassuming alliance of coffee and doughnuts – an unlikely pairing that somehow just works. In a similar vein, our investigation intertwines the serious realm of political analysis with the light-hearted, often surreal world of internet memes, adding a dash of whimsy to the otherwise somber landscape of academic inquiry. After all, who says academia can't have a sense of humor? It's like finding a unicorn in a library – unexpected, yet undeniably delightful.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To kick off our quest for the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and the popularity of the 'like a boss' meme, we embarked on a data-gathering journey that would rival even the most intrepid of adventurers. Our research team scoured the digital expanse, sifting through a trove of data sources including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends. It was like a virtual treasure hunt, except instead of gold doubloons, we hunted for correlation coefficients and meme popularity indices.

We focused our analysis on the time period from 2006 to 2020, aiming to capture the evolution of both political voting patterns and internet meme culture, much like a historian unraveling the enigmatic tale of a centuries-old relic. The 'like a boss' meme, with its rise to prominence in the digital domain, presented itself as a captivating subject for study, akin to a rare species of flora blooming in an unexpected locale – fascinating and tantalizingly peculiar.

Employing a mix of statistical techniques that were as intricate as a tapestry woven by a spider with a PhD in mathematics, we calculated correlation coefficients and p-values to unravel the potential relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and the ebb and flow of 'like a boss' meme popularity. This process required thorough attention to detail, much like a sous chef meticulously crafting an intricate dish, ensuring that each component of the analysis was as fine-tuned as a well-oiled machine in a precision workshop.

In addition, we delved into the world of sentiment analysis, scouring the digital landscape for clues on public perceptions and attitudes toward both political affiliations and internet memes. Like detectives solving a perplexing mystery, we sought to unearth the subtle nuances of public sentiment and explore how it intertwines with the political climate and meme virality. It was akin to deciphering a cryptic message from an ancient civilization, decoding the intricate tapestry of human emotions and perceptions.

Finally, to contextualize our findings within the broader socio-political landscape, we conducted qualitative analyses of historical voting trends and cultural shifts in the digital sphere. We ventured into the labyrinthine corridors of political history and meme evolution, drawing parallels and connections that were as surprising as stumbling upon a disco ball in a library – unexpected, yet undeniably captivating.

In essence, our methodology blends the rigor of statistical analysis with the intrigue of digital cultural exploration, like a fusion dish that marries the precision of a surgeon's scalpel with the creativity of a master chef. Through this multifaceted approach, we endeavored to shed light on the fascinating relationship between political behavior and internet meme culture, adding a sprinkle of whimsy to the traditionally austere field of academic research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and Popularity of the 'like a boss' meme. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends .

For the time period 2006 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8776837, r-squared of 0.7703286, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Revealing the Relationship Between Republican Votes for Senators in Virginia and the Popularity of the 'Like a Boss' Meme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the mysterious link between the political choices of Virginian voters and the virality of the 'like a boss' meme, employing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends. The correlation coefficient of 0.8776837 and p < 0.05 for the period from 2006 to 2020 suggests a compelling association, much like the unsuspected pairing of peanut butter and pickles – perplexing at first, yet oddly complementary. We delve into the intricacies underlying this correlation, exploring the potential influence of cultural zeitgeist on political behavior, and pondering whether political memes might just be the new campaigners' secret sauce. Our findings not only shed light on the surprising interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena, but also add a touch of whimsy to the otherwise solemn field of political research, akin to a clown performing at a black-tie event.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The enigmatic world of politics and the ever-evolving landscape of internet memes may appear to be as disconnected as a moose in a muffin factory. However, our research seeks to unearth the hidden threads that weave these seemingly unrelated realms together. The compelling correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and the burgeoning popularity of the 'like a boss' meme has sparked our curiosity and led us down a rabbit hole of data analysis and speculation. It's as if we stumbled upon a treasure map in a sea of cat videos – unexpected, yet undeniably intriguing.
While the 'like a boss' meme has permeated the digital sphere like an unstoppable force of nature, the rationality behind its correlation with Republican votes for Senators in Virginia may initially seem as perplexing as a penguin trying to navigate a desert. However, as we dig deeper, we aim to unravel this mystery and bring to light the underlying factors that connect these disparate entities.
As we embark on this research journey, we are reminded of the unassuming alliance of coffee and doughnuts – an unlikely pairing that somehow just works. In a similar vein, our investigation intertwines the serious realm of political analysis with the light-hearted, often surreal world of internet memes, adding a dash of whimsy to the otherwise somber landscape of academic inquiry. After all, who says academia can't have a sense of humor? It's like finding a unicorn in a library – unexpected, yet undeniably delightful.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and the popularity of the 'like a boss' meme from 2006 to 2020 revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8776837, indicating a strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. The coefficient's confidence was further supported by the r-squared value of 0.7703286, cementing the robustness of the relationship, much like a trust fall exercise gone astonishingly well.

The p-value of less than 0.05 provides compelling evidence for rejecting the null hypothesis and accepting the alternative hypothesis that there is a significant correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and the 'like a boss' meme popularity. This result is as unexpected as finding a pineapple on a pizza – controversial but undeniably intriguing.

Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot presenting the unmistakably strong connection between the two variables, much like a plot twist in a summer blockbuster – both surprising and captivating.

In summary, our research unearths an unexpected relationship between political behavior and internet culture, emphasizing the need to explore unconventional connections in the ever-expanding digital landscape. This newfound revelation is reminiscent of discovering a hidden passage in a labyrinth – a delightful surprise that expands our understanding of the intricate workings of human behavior.

The unexpected yet compelling correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and the 'like a boss' meme popularity not only challenges traditional assumptions but also injects a touch of humor and wonder into the world of political research. It's like stumbling upon a hidden treasure map in a game of political Clue – unexpected, whimsical, and undeniably exciting.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and Popularity of the 'like a boss' meme. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Revealing the Relationship Between Republican Votes for Senators in Virginia and the Popularity of the 'Like a Boss' Meme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the mysterious link between the political choices of Virginian voters and the virality of the 'like a boss' meme, employing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends. The correlation coefficient of 0.8776837 and p < 0.05 for the period from 2006 to 2020 suggests a compelling association, much like the unsuspected pairing of peanut butter and pickles – perplexing at first, yet oddly complementary. We delve into the intricacies underlying this correlation, exploring the potential influence of cultural zeitgeist on political behavior, and pondering whether political memes might just be the new campaigners' secret sauce. Our findings not only shed light on the surprising interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena, but also add a touch of whimsy to the otherwise solemn field of political research, akin to a clown performing at a black-tie event.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we set out to explore the curious connection between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and the meteoric rise of the 'like a boss' meme, we find ourselves drawing from a myriad of studies and sources that shed light on the unexpected interplay between political behavior and internet culture. To our surprise, the links we uncovered in our investigation were as perplexing as a cat trying to understand quantum physics, yet undeniably captivating.
Smith and Doe (2015) examined the influence of online memes on political engagement and found that humorous internet content has the potential to shape public opinion in subtle yet impactful ways. Further adding to this notion, Jones (2018) explored the crossover between social media phenomena and political affiliations, highlighting the potential for memes to resonate with specific demographics. While these studies set the stage for our research, they merely scratched the surface of the enigmatic relationship we sought to unravel.
Beyond the confines of scholarly works, our quest for understanding led us down unexpected avenues, akin to stumbling upon a leprechaun's pot of gold at the end of a rainbow. Books such as "The Power of Memes: Harnessing Internet Culture for Political Advantage" (Johnson, 2020) and "Digital Democracy: Navigating the Intersection of Politics and Social Media" (Garcia, 2019) provided insightful perspectives on the fusion of internet culture and political discourse, offering valuable context for our exploration.
As we delved deeper into the labyrinthine realm of interconnectedness, we ventured into the realm of fiction – a domain that often mirrors and interprets societal phenomena in unexpected ways. Works such as "Meme Wars: The Battle for Online Supremacy" (Fictional Author, 2017) and "The Politician's Dilemma: A Memeworthy Mystery" (Fictional Author, 2018) whimsically danced on the periphery of our research, serving as a delightful departure from traditional academic discourse.
Moreover, we couldn't overlook the significant influence of childhood influences, as cartoons and children's shows have long been purveyors of societal commentary in disguise. Shows like "Phineas and Ferb" and "SpongeBob SquarePants" subtly introduced young viewers to the nuances of creativity and absurdity, a parallel that seemed oddly fitting to our exploration of political memes and voter behavior. It's as if we stumbled upon a treasure chest of nostalgia in a sea of data analysis – a delightful surprise, reminiscent of discovering an old comic book in the attic.
With these diverse and unconventional sources in mind, we journey forth to uncover the underlying mechanisms that tie together the unexpected duo of political votes and internet memes, armed with a sense of wonder and a pinch of whimsy.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and the popularity of the 'like a boss' meme from 2006 to 2020 revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8776837, indicating a strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. The coefficient's confidence was further supported by the r-squared value of 0.7703286, cementing the robustness of the relationship, much like a trust fall exercise gone astonishingly well.
The p-value of less than 0.05 provides compelling evidence for rejecting the null hypothesis and accepting the alternative hypothesis that there is a significant correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and the 'like a boss' meme popularity. This result is as unexpected as finding a pineapple on a pizza – controversial but undeniably intriguing.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot presenting the unmistakably strong connection between the two variables, much like a plot twist in a summer blockbuster – both surprising and captivating.
In summary, our research unearths an unexpected relationship between political behavior and internet culture, emphasizing the need to explore unconventional connections in the ever-expanding digital landscape. This newfound revelation is reminiscent of discovering a hidden passage in a labyrinth – a delightful surprise that expands our understanding of the intricate workings of human behavior.
The unexpected yet compelling correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and the 'like a boss' meme popularity not only challenges traditional assumptions but also injects a touch of humor and wonder into the world of political research. It's like stumbling upon a hidden treasure map in a game of political Clue – unexpected, whimsical, and undeniably exciting.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have brought to light a truly remarkable correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and the popularity of the 'like a boss' meme. This unexpected association brings to mind the age-old conundrum of whether the chicken came before the egg or vice versa – a puzzle as perplexing as the connection between fashion trends and weather patterns. We find that our findings not only reinforce prior research but also open the door to a whimsical world of interconnections that challenge conventional wisdom, much like discovering a secret garden in the midst of a bustling city.

Our investigation delved into a diverse array of sources, ranging from scholarly studies to whimsical works of fiction, reminiscent of embarking on a literary journey through an enchanted forest. The insights gleaned from these unconventional sources have not only shaped our understanding of this enigmatic relationship but have also infused an element of playfulness and intrigue into our otherwise solemn academic pursuit, akin to stumbling upon a hidden treasure trove in the world of scientific inquiry.

Building upon the foundation laid by previous research, our findings align with the notion that internet memes possess the unexpected power to influence political engagement, evoking a sense of resonance with specific demographic groups, much like a catchy tune that lingers in one's mind long after it has ceased playing. The intricate web of interconnectedness between political behavior and internet culture uncovered in our study reaffirms the significance of exploring unorthodox connections, akin to discovering a hidden passage in the labyrinth of human behavior.

The robustness of the correlation coefficient and the compelling evidence provided by the p-value emphasize the undeniable association between the variables under scrutiny, much like a harmonious duet playing in perfect synchrony. This unexpected revelation challenges traditional assumptions and beckons us to embrace the whimsical and captivating nature of human behavior, akin to witnessing a magician's spellbinding performance amidst a sea of rational inquiry.

In essence, our research not only sheds light on the surprising interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena but also injects a touch of levity into the world of political research. The compelling correlation we've unraveled is akin to stumbling upon a hidden treasure map in a game of political Clue – a delightful surprise that invites us to embark on an exhilarating journey through the uncharted territories of human behavior.

As we immerse ourselves in the bewitching world of unforeseen connections, our study sparks curiosity and invites researchers to venture beyond the confines of conventional inquiry, embracing the spirit of playful exploration and discovery. It's as if we have stumbled upon a forgotten carnival in the midst of scientific pursuits – a delightful diversion that adds a sprinkle of merriment to the otherwise stately atmosphere of academia.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and Popularity of the 'like a boss' meme. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Revealing the Relationship Between Republican Votes for Senators in Virginia and the Popularity of the 'Like a Boss' Meme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the mysterious link between the political choices of Virginian voters and the virality of the 'like a boss' meme, employing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends. The correlation coefficient of 0.8776837 and p < 0.05 for the period from 2006 to 2020 suggests a compelling association, much like the unsuspected pairing of peanut butter and pickles – perplexing at first, yet oddly complementary. We delve into the intricacies underlying this correlation, exploring the potential influence of cultural zeitgeist on political behavior, and pondering whether political memes might just be the new campaigners' secret sauce. Our findings not only shed light on the surprising interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena, but also add a touch of whimsy to the otherwise solemn field of political research, akin to a clown performing at a black-tie event.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The enigmatic world of politics and the ever-evolving landscape of internet memes may appear to be as disconnected as a moose in a muffin factory. However, our research seeks to unearth the hidden threads that weave these seemingly unrelated realms together. The compelling correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and the burgeoning popularity of the 'like a boss' meme has sparked our curiosity and led us down a rabbit hole of data analysis and speculation. It's as if we stumbled upon a treasure map in a sea of cat videos – unexpected, yet undeniably intriguing.
While the 'like a boss' meme has permeated the digital sphere like an unstoppable force of nature, the rationality behind its correlation with Republican votes for Senators in Virginia may initially seem as perplexing as a penguin trying to navigate a desert. However, as we dig deeper, we aim to unravel this mystery and bring to light the underlying factors that connect these disparate entities.
As we embark on this research journey, we are reminded of the unassuming alliance of coffee and doughnuts – an unlikely pairing that somehow just works. In a similar vein, our investigation intertwines the serious realm of political analysis with the light-hearted, often surreal world of internet memes, adding a dash of whimsy to the otherwise somber landscape of academic inquiry. After all, who says academia can't have a sense of humor? It's like finding a unicorn in a library – unexpected, yet undeniably delightful.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and the popularity of the 'like a boss' meme from 2006 to 2020 revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8776837, indicating a strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. The coefficient's confidence was further supported by the r-squared value of 0.7703286, cementing the robustness of the relationship, much like a trust fall exercise gone astonishingly well.
The p-value of less than 0.05 provides compelling evidence for rejecting the null hypothesis and accepting the alternative hypothesis that there is a significant correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and the 'like a boss' meme popularity. This result is as unexpected as finding a pineapple on a pizza – controversial but undeniably intriguing.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot presenting the unmistakably strong connection between the two variables, much like a plot twist in a summer blockbuster – both surprising and captivating.
In summary, our research unearths an unexpected relationship between political behavior and internet culture, emphasizing the need to explore unconventional connections in the ever-expanding digital landscape. This newfound revelation is reminiscent of discovering a hidden passage in a labyrinth – a delightful surprise that expands our understanding of the intricate workings of human behavior.
The unexpected yet compelling correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and the 'like a boss' meme popularity not only challenges traditional assumptions but also injects a touch of humor and wonder into the world of political research. It's like stumbling upon a hidden treasure map in a game of political Clue – unexpected, whimsical, and undeniably exciting.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the perplexing correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Virginia and the popularity of the 'like a boss' meme has unraveled a web of unexpected connections, much like a detective stumbling upon a trail of breadcrumbs in a candy store. The robust correlation coefficient and r-squared value emphasize the surprisingly strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, akin to uncovering a secret twin in a telenovela – a twist that leaves us both astonished and amused.

The p-value's significance further solidifies the validity of this correlation, much like a solid handshake – firm and convincing. Our findings underscore the need to embrace unconventional pairings in the world of research, similar to the fusion cuisine craze – unexpected, yet enriching.

As we reflect on this journey, it's akin to discovering a rare Pokémon in a library – an improbable yet delightful encounter. Our study not only challenges traditional notions but also infuses a sense of whimsy into the realm of political analysis, reminding us that even serious matters can have a lighthearted side. It's like finding a clown in a courtroom – unexpected, yet undeniably entertaining.

Therefore, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, much like realizing that the quest for the Holy Grail can end with a cup of coffee – satisfying and complete. Let's sit back, sip our coffee, and enjoy the delightful mystery that is the correlation between political behavior and internet culture, like a boss.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Revealing the Relationship Between Republican Votes for Senators in Virginia and the Popularity of the 'Like a Boss' Meme. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Political Psychology and Internet Culture


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Revealing the Relationship Between Republican Votes for Senators in Virginia and the Popularity of the 'Like a Boss' Meme. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Social Media and Political Behavior Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Revealing the Relationship Between Republican Votes for Senators in Virginia and the Popularity of the 'Like a Boss' Meme with an abstract of This paper investigates the mysterious link between the political choices of Virginian voters and the virality of the 'like a boss' meme, employing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends. The correlation coefficient of 0.8776837 and p < 0.05 for the period from 2006 to 2020 suggests a compelling association, much like the unsuspected pairing of peanut butter and pickles – perplexing at first, yet oddly complementary. We delve into the intricacies underlying this correlation, exploring the potential influence of cultural zeitgeist on political behavior, and pondering whether political memes might just be the new campaigners' secret sauce. Our findings not only shed light on the surprising interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena, but also add a touch of whimsy to the otherwise solemn field of political research, akin to a clown performing at a black-tie event.

ChatGPT:

Republican votes, senators in Virginia, 'Like a Boss' meme, political choices, Virginian voters, virality, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, cultural zeitgeist, political behavior, political memes, campaigners, secret sauce

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Republican Senators in Virginia
Detailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Republican Senate candidates in Virginia
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Republican Senators in Virginia

Popularity of the 'like a boss' meme
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'like a boss' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.

See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'like a boss' meme

Correlation r = 0.8776837 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7703286 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 77% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Popularity of the 'like a boss' meme) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Republican Senators in Virginia) over the 6 years from 2006 through 2020.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.022. 0.0215269246706639200000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.88 in 2.2% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 46 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.23, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200620082012201420182020
Votes for Republican Senators in Virginia (Total votes)116628012288301785540105594013743101934200
Popularity of the 'like a boss' meme (Relative popularity)118.916674.833333.2514.3333




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  6. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1166280,1228830,1785540,1055940,1374310,1934200,])
array_2 = np.array([1,1,8.91667,4.83333,3.25,14.3333,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Republican Senators in Virginia"
array_2_name = "Popularity of the 'like a boss' meme"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 4736 · Black Variable ID: 26329 · Red Variable ID: 25142
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0