about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,669 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How professional-sounding CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Fossil fuel use in United States.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the United States burns less fossil fuels, the collective brainpower of the nation is no longer being smothered by a thick haze of carbon emissions. This has inexplicably led to an upsurge in professional-sounding video titles, as if the very syllables themselves have donned tiny business suits. It's as if the fossil fuels were the unruly party crashers at the grammar gala, and now that they're gone, it's all sophisticated adjectives and articulate phrasing. Who knew that reducing emissions could also lead to an increase in eloquent expressions?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that embodies cybernetic art, depicting a bright, pristine room with a large chalkboard displaying professional-sounding YouTube video titles. In the background, a coal power plant emits less smoke, with the impact fading away as the haze lifts. Infuse the surroundings with an air of sophistication, symbolizing the transformation brought about by reduced fossil fuel use. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How professional-sounding CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in United States. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cybernetic art Realistic Macabre Psychedelic Cyberpunk
ChatGPT: Cybernetic art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How professional-sounding CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in United States, in the following situation: As the United States burns less fossil fuels, the collective brainpower of the nation is no longer being smothered by a thick haze of carbon emissions. This has inexplicably led to an upsurge in professional-sounding video titles, as if the very syllables themselves have donned tiny business suits. It's as if the fossil fuels were the unruly party crashers at the grammar gala, and now that they're gone, it's all sophisticated adjectives and articulate phrasing. Who knew that reducing emissions could also lead to an increase in eloquent expressions?. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bright, clean room, the air is clear and the atmosphere pristine. A large chalkboard stands against one wall, adorned with neatly written, professional-sounding YouTube video titles. Meanwhile, a coal power plant in the background emits less smoke, its impact fading away as the looming haze lifts. The air of sophistication seemingly infuses the surroundings, as if the reduction in fossil fuel use has transformed the very essence of language itself.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cybernetic art ] and depicting this scene: In a bright, clean room, the air is clear and the atmosphere pristine. A large chalkboard stands against one wall, adorned with neatly written, professional-sounding YouTube video titles. Meanwhile, a coal power plant in the background emits less smoke, its impact fading away as the looming haze lifts. The air of sophistication seemingly infuses the surroundings, as if the reduction in fossil fuel use has transformed the very essence of language itself. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that embodies cybernetic art, depicting a bright, pristine room with a large chalkboard displaying professional-sounding YouTube video titles. In the background, a coal power plant emits less smoke, with the impact fading away as the haze lifts. Infuse the surroundings with an air of sophistication, symbolizing the transformation brought about by reduced fossil fuel use.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in How professional-sounding CGP Grey YouTube video titles are caused Fossil fuel use in United States to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fueling Entertainment: The Gas-tly Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and Fossil Fuel Use in the United States

The Journal of Quirky Energy Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8499966 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling Entertainment: The Gas-tly Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and Fossil Fuel Use in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to investigate the relationship between the professional-sounding titles of CGP Grey YouTube videos and the consumption of fossil fuels in the United States. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a thorough examination of the link between these seemingly disparate entities. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8499966 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2021, indicating a robust connection between the two variables.

Dad Joke Alert! Why did the fossil fuel enjoy watching CGP Grey videos? Because it found them to be "fuel-tastic"!

Our research provides compelling evidence suggesting that there may be underlying influences of YouTube video titles on the demand for fossil fuels, with potential implications for energy consumption patterns and entertainment preferences. This study contributes to the burgeoning field of interdisciplinary research, shedding light on the unexpected intersections between digital media and energy behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling Entertainment: The Gas-tly Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and Fossil Fuel Use in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to investigate the relationship between the professional-sounding titles of CGP Grey YouTube videos and the consumption of fossil fuels in the United States. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a thorough examination of the link between these seemingly disparate entities. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8499966 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2021, indicating a robust connection between the two variables.

Dad Joke Alert! Why did the fossil fuel enjoy watching CGP Grey videos? Because it found them to be "fuel-tastic"!

Our research provides compelling evidence suggesting that there may be underlying influences of YouTube video titles on the demand for fossil fuels, with potential implications for energy consumption patterns and entertainment preferences. This study contributes to the burgeoning field of interdisciplinary research, shedding light on the unexpected intersections between digital media and energy behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between media consumption and societal behavior is a topic of growing interest in research, as digital platforms continue to shape individual preferences and consumption patterns. The rise of YouTube as a prominent source of entertainment and information has sparked inquiries into the potential influence of its content on various aspects of human behavior. In this context, the professional-sounding titles of CGP Grey videos, known for their informative and compelling content, have attracted attention for their potential impact on audience engagement and, as this study posits, on fossil fuel use in the United States.

Dad Joke Alert! What do you get when you cross a CGP Grey video with a fossil fuel? A "coal-aborative" effort in stimulating intellectual curiosity and carbon emissions!

While the influence of media on consumer behavior has been well-documented in marketing and communication studies, its connections to energy consumption are a relatively unexplored terrain. This study seeks to fill this gap by examining the association between the linguistic characteristics of CGP Grey video titles and the demand for fossil fuels. Through a rigorous analysis encompassing linguistic, cultural, and environmental dimensions, this research aims to offer insights into how seemingly unrelated factors may interact to shape societal trends.

The discovery of a robust connection between professional-sounding video titles and fossil fuel use would not only expand our understanding of the mechanisms through which digital content influences behavior but could also have implications for energy policy and environmental sustainability. This study thus holds the potential to illuminate an overlooked aspect of the complex interplay between digital media and energy consumption dynamics, offering a fresh perspective on the societal impacts of online content.

Dad Joke Alert! Why did the fossil fuel declare CGP Grey videos to be its favorite form of entertainment? Because it found them to be a "carbon-neutral" source of intellectual stimulation!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling Entertainment: The Gas-tly Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and Fossil Fuel Use in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to investigate the relationship between the professional-sounding titles of CGP Grey YouTube videos and the consumption of fossil fuels in the United States. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a thorough examination of the link between these seemingly disparate entities. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8499966 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2021, indicating a robust connection between the two variables.

Dad Joke Alert! Why did the fossil fuel enjoy watching CGP Grey videos? Because it found them to be "fuel-tastic"!

Our research provides compelling evidence suggesting that there may be underlying influences of YouTube video titles on the demand for fossil fuels, with potential implications for energy consumption patterns and entertainment preferences. This study contributes to the burgeoning field of interdisciplinary research, shedding light on the unexpected intersections between digital media and energy behavior.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between media consumption and societal behavior is a topic of growing interest in research, as digital platforms continue to shape individual preferences and consumption patterns. The rise of YouTube as a prominent source of entertainment and information has sparked inquiries into the potential influence of its content on various aspects of human behavior. In this context, the professional-sounding titles of CGP Grey videos, known for their informative and compelling content, have attracted attention for their potential impact on audience engagement and, as this study posits, on fossil fuel use in the United States.
Dad Joke Alert! What do you get when you cross a CGP Grey video with a fossil fuel? A "coal-aborative" effort in stimulating intellectual curiosity and carbon emissions!
While the influence of media on consumer behavior has been well-documented in marketing and communication studies, its connections to energy consumption are a relatively unexplored terrain. This study seeks to fill this gap by examining the association between the linguistic characteristics of CGP Grey video titles and the demand for fossil fuels. Through a rigorous analysis encompassing linguistic, cultural, and environmental dimensions, this research aims to offer insights into how seemingly unrelated factors may interact to shape societal trends.
The discovery of a robust connection between professional-sounding video titles and fossil fuel use would not only expand our understanding of the mechanisms through which digital content influences behavior but could also have implications for energy policy and environmental sustainability. This study thus holds the potential to illuminate an overlooked aspect of the complex interplay between digital media and energy consumption dynamics, offering a fresh perspective on the societal impacts of online content.
Dad Joke Alert! Why did the fossil fuel declare CGP Grey videos to be its favorite form of entertainment? Because it found them to be a "carbon-neutral" source of intellectual stimulation!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between the professional-sounding titles of CGP Grey YouTube videos and fossil fuel use in the United States has garnered increasing attention in academic circles. Smith et al. (2018) conducted a comprehensive analysis of digital media influences on energy consumption, noting the potential significance of linguistic features in shaping audience perceptions and behaviors. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2019) explored the intersection of online content and environmental impact, highlighting the need for interdisciplinary approaches to understand the complexities of modern media's effects on societal trends.

Dad Joke Alert! With the puns and wordplay in CGP Grey video titles, it seems that the "word economy" is not the only thing being influenced here.

In "Book," the authors find that the linguistic qualities of media content may have subtle yet substantial implications for resource utilization, setting the stage for inquiries into specific platforms and their potential environmental footprints. As the body of literature on media's societal impacts continues to expand, it becomes increasingly apparent that the influence of digital content extends beyond conventional realms of inquiry.

Turning to non-fiction books related to the intersection of media and environmental impact, "This Changes Everything" by Naomi Klein and "The Sixth Extinction" by Elizabeth Kolbert present thought-provoking perspectives on the interconnectedness of human activities and ecological consequences. These works offer valuable insights into the broader context of environmental discourse, prompting considerations of how digital media may intersect with such critical issues.

Furthermore, fictitious narratives such as "The Carbon Diaries" series by Saci Lloyd and "Oil!" by Upton Sinclair evoke imaginative scenarios and thematic explorations that align with the thematic underpinnings of our study. While these literary creations may not provide empirical evidence, they contribute to the contextual backdrop against which our investigation unfolds.

On a lighter note, the television shows "Breaking Bad," "Better Call Saul," and "Pimp My Ride" offer intriguing perspectives on human desires, decision-making processes, and, tangentially, the consumption of fossil fuels. The characters' journeys and the unfolding narratives spark reflections on the complex interplay of individual choices and societal patterns, albeit in dramatically divergent contexts.

In conclusion, the existing literature underscores the need for a holistic understanding of the multifaceted influences on energy consumption, encompassing both factual analyses and creative explorations. As this study delves into the entwined realms of digital media and environmental behavior, it stands poised to contribute to this rich tapestry of interdisciplinary inquiries in unforeseen and, dare I say, entertaining ways.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling Entertainment: The Gas-tly Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and Fossil Fuel Use in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to investigate the relationship between the professional-sounding titles of CGP Grey YouTube videos and the consumption of fossil fuels in the United States. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a thorough examination of the link between these seemingly disparate entities. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8499966 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2021, indicating a robust connection between the two variables.

Dad Joke Alert! Why did the fossil fuel enjoy watching CGP Grey videos? Because it found them to be "fuel-tastic"!

Our research provides compelling evidence suggesting that there may be underlying influences of YouTube video titles on the demand for fossil fuels, with potential implications for energy consumption patterns and entertainment preferences. This study contributes to the burgeoning field of interdisciplinary research, shedding light on the unexpected intersections between digital media and energy behavior.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between media consumption and societal behavior is a topic of growing interest in research, as digital platforms continue to shape individual preferences and consumption patterns. The rise of YouTube as a prominent source of entertainment and information has sparked inquiries into the potential influence of its content on various aspects of human behavior. In this context, the professional-sounding titles of CGP Grey videos, known for their informative and compelling content, have attracted attention for their potential impact on audience engagement and, as this study posits, on fossil fuel use in the United States.
Dad Joke Alert! What do you get when you cross a CGP Grey video with a fossil fuel? A "coal-aborative" effort in stimulating intellectual curiosity and carbon emissions!
While the influence of media on consumer behavior has been well-documented in marketing and communication studies, its connections to energy consumption are a relatively unexplored terrain. This study seeks to fill this gap by examining the association between the linguistic characteristics of CGP Grey video titles and the demand for fossil fuels. Through a rigorous analysis encompassing linguistic, cultural, and environmental dimensions, this research aims to offer insights into how seemingly unrelated factors may interact to shape societal trends.
The discovery of a robust connection between professional-sounding video titles and fossil fuel use would not only expand our understanding of the mechanisms through which digital content influences behavior but could also have implications for energy policy and environmental sustainability. This study thus holds the potential to illuminate an overlooked aspect of the complex interplay between digital media and energy consumption dynamics, offering a fresh perspective on the societal impacts of online content.
Dad Joke Alert! Why did the fossil fuel declare CGP Grey videos to be its favorite form of entertainment? Because it found them to be a "carbon-neutral" source of intellectual stimulation!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The data for this study were collected from multiple sources, with a primary focus on AI analysis of CGP Grey YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration's records of fossil fuel consumption in the United States from 2011 to 2021. The AI analysis involved meticulous scrutiny of linguistic patterns, semantic structures, and emotional valence within the titles of over 1000 CGP Grey videos. This process aimed to capture the professional-sounding nature of the video titles, as well as their potential to evoke intellectual curiosity and engagement. Simultaneously, the Energy Information Administration's data provided comprehensive information on the consumption of various fossil fuels, enabling a detailed examination of energy usage trends.

Data Analysis:
To establish the relationship between the professional-sounding CGP Grey video titles and fossil fuel use, advanced statistical methodologies were employed. The linguistic features of the video titles were quantitatively assessed through natural language processing techniques and sentiment analysis algorithms. Meanwhile, the fossil fuel consumption data were subjected to time series analysis and econometric modeling to identify temporal patterns and underlying correlations. These analytical approaches allowed for the identification of potential associations between the linguistic characteristics of CGP Grey video titles and fluctuations in fossil fuel demand over the studied period.

Multivariate Regression Analysis:
In addition to the univariate analyses, multivariate regression models were constructed to control for confounding variables and elucidate the independent influence of professional-sounding video titles on fossil fuel consumption. The regression framework incorporated socio-economic indicators, environmental factors, and media engagement metrics to discern the specific impact of CGP Grey video titles on energy usage. Through this approach, we aimed to disentangle the nuanced interplay of diverse factors while exploring the unique contribution of linguistic features in shaping energy behavior.

Dad Joke Alert! What did the researcher say to the multivariate regression model? "I hope you're ready for some 'multi-fun-invariable' analysis!"

Robustness Checks:
To verify the stability and reliability of the findings, robustness checks were conducted employing bootstrapping methods and sensitivity analyses. These procedures served to validate the statistical significance of the observed correlations and assess the resilience of the results to variations in model specifications and data perturbations. The meticulous attention to robustness ensured that the identified connection between CGP Grey video titles and fossil fuel use withstood rigorous scrutiny and provided robust insights into the underlying relationship.

Ethical Considerations:
Throughout the research process, ethical considerations were paramount, particularly in handling sensitive linguistic data and energy consumption information. All data were anonymized and aggregated to preserve the privacy of individuals and organizations, while adhering to established ethical guidelines for data-driven research. Moreover, the interpretations and implications of the findings were presented with caution, mindful of the potential societal and policy ramifications stemming from the identified associations.

In summary, the methodology employed in this study aimed to rigorously investigate the linkage between professional-sounding CGP Grey video titles and fossil fuel consumption, leveraging advanced data analytics and statistical approaches. The comprehensive analysis facilitated a nuanced understanding of the potential influence of digital media on energy behavior, yielding critical insights into the synergetic dynamics between linguistic content and societal energy consumption patterns.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8499966, r-squared of 0.7224943, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling Entertainment: The Gas-tly Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and Fossil Fuel Use in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to investigate the relationship between the professional-sounding titles of CGP Grey YouTube videos and the consumption of fossil fuels in the United States. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a thorough examination of the link between these seemingly disparate entities. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8499966 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2021, indicating a robust connection between the two variables.

Dad Joke Alert! Why did the fossil fuel enjoy watching CGP Grey videos? Because it found them to be "fuel-tastic"!

Our research provides compelling evidence suggesting that there may be underlying influences of YouTube video titles on the demand for fossil fuels, with potential implications for energy consumption patterns and entertainment preferences. This study contributes to the burgeoning field of interdisciplinary research, shedding light on the unexpected intersections between digital media and energy behavior.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between media consumption and societal behavior is a topic of growing interest in research, as digital platforms continue to shape individual preferences and consumption patterns. The rise of YouTube as a prominent source of entertainment and information has sparked inquiries into the potential influence of its content on various aspects of human behavior. In this context, the professional-sounding titles of CGP Grey videos, known for their informative and compelling content, have attracted attention for their potential impact on audience engagement and, as this study posits, on fossil fuel use in the United States.
Dad Joke Alert! What do you get when you cross a CGP Grey video with a fossil fuel? A "coal-aborative" effort in stimulating intellectual curiosity and carbon emissions!
While the influence of media on consumer behavior has been well-documented in marketing and communication studies, its connections to energy consumption are a relatively unexplored terrain. This study seeks to fill this gap by examining the association between the linguistic characteristics of CGP Grey video titles and the demand for fossil fuels. Through a rigorous analysis encompassing linguistic, cultural, and environmental dimensions, this research aims to offer insights into how seemingly unrelated factors may interact to shape societal trends.
The discovery of a robust connection between professional-sounding video titles and fossil fuel use would not only expand our understanding of the mechanisms through which digital content influences behavior but could also have implications for energy policy and environmental sustainability. This study thus holds the potential to illuminate an overlooked aspect of the complex interplay between digital media and energy consumption dynamics, offering a fresh perspective on the societal impacts of online content.
Dad Joke Alert! Why did the fossil fuel declare CGP Grey videos to be its favorite form of entertainment? Because it found them to be a "carbon-neutral" source of intellectual stimulation!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the collected data revealed a strong positive correlation between the professional-sounding CGP Grey YouTube video titles and fossil fuel use in the United States during the period of 2011 to 2021. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.8499966, indicating a highly significant relationship between the two variables. This finding suggests that as the professionalism of the video titles increased, so did the consumption of fossil fuels in the United States.

The r-squared value of 0.7224943 further supports the strength of the relationship between the variables, explaining approximately 72.25% of the variation in fossil fuel use based on the variations in CGP Grey video titles. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the robustness of the findings and indicates that the observed correlation is unlikely to be due to random chance.

Dad Joke Alert! why did the fossil fuel use CGP Grey's video titles to pick up a date? Because it heard they were great at "carbon dating"!

Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between the professionalism of CGP Grey video titles and fossil fuel use in the United States. As the professionalism of the video titles increases, there is a noticeable upward trend in fossil fuel consumption, emphasizing the substantive nature of the relationship.

These results provide empirical support for the hypothesis that the linguistic characteristics of YouTube video titles, particularly those that convey professionalism and expertise, may be associated with broader societal behavior, including energy consumption patterns. The findings of this study contribute to our understanding of the potential impact of digital media content on real-world outcomes and underscore the significance of considering diverse factors in the analysis of energy consumption dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Fueling Entertainment: The Gas-tly Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and Fossil Fuel Use in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to investigate the relationship between the professional-sounding titles of CGP Grey YouTube videos and the consumption of fossil fuels in the United States. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a thorough examination of the link between these seemingly disparate entities. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8499966 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2021, indicating a robust connection between the two variables.

Dad Joke Alert! Why did the fossil fuel enjoy watching CGP Grey videos? Because it found them to be "fuel-tastic"!

Our research provides compelling evidence suggesting that there may be underlying influences of YouTube video titles on the demand for fossil fuels, with potential implications for energy consumption patterns and entertainment preferences. This study contributes to the burgeoning field of interdisciplinary research, shedding light on the unexpected intersections between digital media and energy behavior.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between the professional-sounding titles of CGP Grey YouTube videos and fossil fuel use in the United States has garnered increasing attention in academic circles. Smith et al. (2018) conducted a comprehensive analysis of digital media influences on energy consumption, noting the potential significance of linguistic features in shaping audience perceptions and behaviors. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2019) explored the intersection of online content and environmental impact, highlighting the need for interdisciplinary approaches to understand the complexities of modern media's effects on societal trends.
Dad Joke Alert! With the puns and wordplay in CGP Grey video titles, it seems that the "word economy" is not the only thing being influenced here.
In "Book," the authors find that the linguistic qualities of media content may have subtle yet substantial implications for resource utilization, setting the stage for inquiries into specific platforms and their potential environmental footprints. As the body of literature on media's societal impacts continues to expand, it becomes increasingly apparent that the influence of digital content extends beyond conventional realms of inquiry.
Turning to non-fiction books related to the intersection of media and environmental impact, "This Changes Everything" by Naomi Klein and "The Sixth Extinction" by Elizabeth Kolbert present thought-provoking perspectives on the interconnectedness of human activities and ecological consequences. These works offer valuable insights into the broader context of environmental discourse, prompting considerations of how digital media may intersect with such critical issues.
Furthermore, fictitious narratives such as "The Carbon Diaries" series by Saci Lloyd and "Oil!" by Upton Sinclair evoke imaginative scenarios and thematic explorations that align with the thematic underpinnings of our study. While these literary creations may not provide empirical evidence, they contribute to the contextual backdrop against which our investigation unfolds.
On a lighter note, the television shows "Breaking Bad," "Better Call Saul," and "Pimp My Ride" offer intriguing perspectives on human desires, decision-making processes, and, tangentially, the consumption of fossil fuels. The characters' journeys and the unfolding narratives spark reflections on the complex interplay of individual choices and societal patterns, albeit in dramatically divergent contexts.
In conclusion, the existing literature underscores the need for a holistic understanding of the multifaceted influences on energy consumption, encompassing both factual analyses and creative explorations. As this study delves into the entwined realms of digital media and environmental behavior, it stands poised to contribute to this rich tapestry of interdisciplinary inquiries in unforeseen and, dare I say, entertaining ways.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the collected data revealed a strong positive correlation between the professional-sounding CGP Grey YouTube video titles and fossil fuel use in the United States during the period of 2011 to 2021. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.8499966, indicating a highly significant relationship between the two variables. This finding suggests that as the professionalism of the video titles increased, so did the consumption of fossil fuels in the United States.
The r-squared value of 0.7224943 further supports the strength of the relationship between the variables, explaining approximately 72.25% of the variation in fossil fuel use based on the variations in CGP Grey video titles. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the robustness of the findings and indicates that the observed correlation is unlikely to be due to random chance.
Dad Joke Alert! why did the fossil fuel use CGP Grey's video titles to pick up a date? Because it heard they were great at "carbon dating"!
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between the professionalism of CGP Grey video titles and fossil fuel use in the United States. As the professionalism of the video titles increases, there is a noticeable upward trend in fossil fuel consumption, emphasizing the substantive nature of the relationship.
These results provide empirical support for the hypothesis that the linguistic characteristics of YouTube video titles, particularly those that convey professionalism and expertise, may be associated with broader societal behavior, including energy consumption patterns. The findings of this study contribute to our understanding of the potential impact of digital media content on real-world outcomes and underscore the significance of considering diverse factors in the analysis of energy consumption dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study align with previous research that has highlighted the influence of linguistic features in digital media on audience behaviors, including their potential impact on energy consumption patterns. As Smith et al. (2018) suggested, the linguistic qualities of online content may exert subtle yet meaningful influences on societal trends, a notion substantiated by the robust correlation identified in our investigation. This correlation strengthens the argument for the relevance of linguistic features in shaping audience perceptions, a concept that extends beyond the realm of traditional media and into the digital landscape.

The significant correlation coefficient and the low p-value reported in our study provide empirical support for the hypothesis that the professionalism of CGP Grey video titles is associated with increased fossil fuel consumption in the United States. This result underscores the need for further inquiry into the potential mechanisms through which digital media content, particularly the linguistic attributes of titles, may affect real-world behaviors, including energy usage.

Building upon the insights from Doe and Jones (2019), our findings prompt considerations of how digital media platforms can inadvertently influence societal patterns, whether through intentional messaging or subconscious cues embedded in content. The robust relationship identified in our study encourages a reevaluation of the broader societal implications of digital media, posing implications for not only energy consumption but also a range of behavioral outcomes influenced by linguistic features in media content.

Dad Joke Alert! With the significant correlation we uncovered, it seems that, in this case, we could say that "professional-sounding YouTube titles are fueled by success"!

However, it is important to note that correlation does not imply causation. While our findings suggest a strong association between the professionalism of CGP Grey video titles and fossil fuel use in the United States, further studies are warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and causal pathways that may drive this relationship. Additionally, it would be imperative to explore potential moderating factors, such as audience demographics and regional variations, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the observed correlation.

Overall, our study contributes to the growing body of interdisciplinary research that examines the unexpected intersections between digital media and societal behaviors. By uncovering a robust connection between the linguistic features of YouTube video titles and energy consumption patterns, our findings underscore the need for ongoing exploration of the multifaceted influences of digital media in shaping real-world outcomes. This study sets the stage for future inquiries into the potential ramifications of linguistic characteristics of online content, all the while reminding us that even seemingly unrelated entities may have intricate connections waiting to be unveiled.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling Entertainment: The Gas-tly Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and Fossil Fuel Use in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to investigate the relationship between the professional-sounding titles of CGP Grey YouTube videos and the consumption of fossil fuels in the United States. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a thorough examination of the link between these seemingly disparate entities. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8499966 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2021, indicating a robust connection between the two variables.

Dad Joke Alert! Why did the fossil fuel enjoy watching CGP Grey videos? Because it found them to be "fuel-tastic"!

Our research provides compelling evidence suggesting that there may be underlying influences of YouTube video titles on the demand for fossil fuels, with potential implications for energy consumption patterns and entertainment preferences. This study contributes to the burgeoning field of interdisciplinary research, shedding light on the unexpected intersections between digital media and energy behavior.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between media consumption and societal behavior is a topic of growing interest in research, as digital platforms continue to shape individual preferences and consumption patterns. The rise of YouTube as a prominent source of entertainment and information has sparked inquiries into the potential influence of its content on various aspects of human behavior. In this context, the professional-sounding titles of CGP Grey videos, known for their informative and compelling content, have attracted attention for their potential impact on audience engagement and, as this study posits, on fossil fuel use in the United States.
Dad Joke Alert! What do you get when you cross a CGP Grey video with a fossil fuel? A "coal-aborative" effort in stimulating intellectual curiosity and carbon emissions!
While the influence of media on consumer behavior has been well-documented in marketing and communication studies, its connections to energy consumption are a relatively unexplored terrain. This study seeks to fill this gap by examining the association between the linguistic characteristics of CGP Grey video titles and the demand for fossil fuels. Through a rigorous analysis encompassing linguistic, cultural, and environmental dimensions, this research aims to offer insights into how seemingly unrelated factors may interact to shape societal trends.
The discovery of a robust connection between professional-sounding video titles and fossil fuel use would not only expand our understanding of the mechanisms through which digital content influences behavior but could also have implications for energy policy and environmental sustainability. This study thus holds the potential to illuminate an overlooked aspect of the complex interplay between digital media and energy consumption dynamics, offering a fresh perspective on the societal impacts of online content.
Dad Joke Alert! Why did the fossil fuel declare CGP Grey videos to be its favorite form of entertainment? Because it found them to be a "carbon-neutral" source of intellectual stimulation!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the collected data revealed a strong positive correlation between the professional-sounding CGP Grey YouTube video titles and fossil fuel use in the United States during the period of 2011 to 2021. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.8499966, indicating a highly significant relationship between the two variables. This finding suggests that as the professionalism of the video titles increased, so did the consumption of fossil fuels in the United States.
The r-squared value of 0.7224943 further supports the strength of the relationship between the variables, explaining approximately 72.25% of the variation in fossil fuel use based on the variations in CGP Grey video titles. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the robustness of the findings and indicates that the observed correlation is unlikely to be due to random chance.
Dad Joke Alert! why did the fossil fuel use CGP Grey's video titles to pick up a date? Because it heard they were great at "carbon dating"!
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between the professionalism of CGP Grey video titles and fossil fuel use in the United States. As the professionalism of the video titles increases, there is a noticeable upward trend in fossil fuel consumption, emphasizing the substantive nature of the relationship.
These results provide empirical support for the hypothesis that the linguistic characteristics of YouTube video titles, particularly those that convey professionalism and expertise, may be associated with broader societal behavior, including energy consumption patterns. The findings of this study contribute to our understanding of the potential impact of digital media content on real-world outcomes and underscore the significance of considering diverse factors in the analysis of energy consumption dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has illuminated a surprisingly robust and statistically significant link between the professional-sounding titles of CGP Grey YouTube videos and fossil fuel use in the United States. The findings provide compelling evidence of a substantial association between the linguistic characteristics of digital media content and societal energy consumption patterns. This unexpected connection underscores the intricate ways in which seemingly unrelated elements can intertwine to influence real-world behaviors.

Dad Joke Alert! Why is it a bad idea to tell secrets to fossil fuels? Because they tend to spill the "petroleum" beans!

The substantial correlation coefficient and r-squared value ascertain the strength of the identified relationship, indicating that as the professionalism of the video titles increases, so does the consumption of fossil fuels. These results underscore the potential impact of digital media content on energy demand, highlighting the need for further exploration of the intersection between entertainment preferences and environmental outcomes.

It is important to note that this study sheds light on a previously unexplored terrain, and as such, opens the door for future research endeavors. However, it is critical to exercise caution when interpreting the findings, as they represent a correlation and do not imply causation. The complex interplay of multifaceted factors in shaping energy consumption patterns warrants comprehensive investigations to uncover the underlying mechanisms at play.

Dad Joke Alert! What do you get when you mix CGP Grey, fossil fuels, and a dad joke? A "combustible" combination of intellectual stimulation and humor!

Nevertheless, based on the robust evidence presented, it is reasonable to assert that the title style of CGP Grey videos may indeed exert influence on the demand for fossil fuels in the United States. Therefore, this study calls for heightened attention to the potential impacts of digital media content on energy behaviors and advocates for continued interdisciplinary explorations in this domain.

In light of the compelling findings and the undeniable entertainment value of CGP Grey's videos, it can be confidently stated that no further research is needed to establish the "gas-tly" connection between professional-sounding video titles and fossil fuel use.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fueling Entertainment: The Gas-tly Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and Fossil Fuel Use in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fueling Entertainment: The Gas-tly Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and Fossil Fuel Use in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for Investigating the Impacts of Internet Content on Resource Consumption


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fueling Entertainment: The Gas-tly Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and Fossil Fuel Use in the United States with an abstract of This study aims to investigate the relationship between the professional-sounding titles of CGP Grey YouTube videos and the consumption of fossil fuels in the United States. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a thorough examination of the link between these seemingly disparate entities. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8499966 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2021, indicating a robust connection between the two variables.
Dad Joke Alert! Why did the fossil fuel enjoy watching CGP Grey videos? Because it found them to be "fuel-tastic"!
Our research provides compelling evidence suggesting that there may be underlying influences of YouTube video titles on the demand for fossil fuels, with potential implications for energy consumption patterns and entertainment preferences. This study contributes to the burgeoning field of interdisciplinary research, shedding light on the unexpected intersections between digital media and energy behavior.

ChatGPT:

CGP Grey video titles, fossil fuel use, United States, AI analysis, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, p-value, energy consumption patterns, entertainment preferences, digital media, interdisciplinary research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How professional-sounding CGP Grey YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How professional-sounding CGP Grey YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How professional-sounding CGP Grey YouTube video titles are

Fossil fuel use in United States
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in United States in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in United States

Correlation r = 0.8499966 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7224943 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 72.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Fossil fuel use in United States) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How professional-sounding CGP Grey YouTube video titles are) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00092. 0.0009202104705400320000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 0.092% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,087 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.51, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
How professional-sounding CGP Grey YouTube video titles are (Score (out of 10))7.55567.40916.72737.55566.77787.27276.256.86.92315.84216.4
Fossil fuel use in United States (Billion kWh)2788.872775.022745.972750.62728.432655.432537.42660.022584.422429.342503.97




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7.5556,7.4091,6.7273,7.5556,6.7778,7.2727,6.25,6.8,6.9231,5.8421,6.4,])
array_2 = np.array([2788.87,2775.02,2745.97,2750.6,2728.43,2655.43,2537.4,2660.02,2584.42,2429.34,2503.97,])
array_1_name = "How professional-sounding CGP Grey YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Fossil fuel use in United States"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 4669 · Black Variable ID: 25903 · Red Variable ID: 24074
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0