about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,561 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Gina and the second variable is Total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2015 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Every time someone named Gina was born, a new mathematical prodigy was also born, destined to create mind-bending content for 3Blue1Brown. The universe just couldn't resist adding an extra dimension of genius to the videos. It's as if their brains were hardwired to unravel the mysteries of math in the most captivating way possible. Plus, with a name like Gina, they were always destined for 'geo'metric greatness!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a cute cartoon image of a bustling hospital, with a focus on a newborn named Gina cradled in her mother's arms. In a nearby room, a group of brilliant individuals are brainstorming, each with a unique creative aura. Show the room filled with ideas floating as ethereal forms while the videos of 3Blue1Brown's YouTube channel is visually represented as a growing entity, mirroring the rise of Gina's popularity. The atmosphere should exude a sense of creativity and growth, with a noticeable parallel between the narratives being spun and the baby's rise in popularity. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Gina and Total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Futuristic A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Whimsical illustration Cute cartoon
ChatGPT: Cute cartoon

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Gina and Total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos, in the following situation: Every time someone named Gina was born, a new mathematical prodigy was also born, destined to create mind-bending content for 3Blue1Brown. The universe just couldn't resist adding an extra dimension of genius to the videos. It's as if their brains were hardwired to unravel the mysteries of math in the most captivating way possible. Plus, with a name like Gina, they were always destined for 'geo'metric greatness!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling hospital, a newborn named Gina was cradled in her mother's arms while a group of brilliant individuals gathered in a nearby room, brainstorming how to weave captivating narratives into 3Blue1Brown's YouTube videos. As they spun their ideas, the length of the videos grew in parallel to Gina's rise in popularity, both reaching new heights with each passing day.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute cartoon ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling hospital, a newborn named Gina was cradled in her mother's arms while a group of brilliant individuals gathered in a nearby room, brainstorming how to weave captivating narratives into 3Blue1Brown's YouTube videos. As they spun their ideas, the length of the videos grew in parallel to Gina's rise in popularity, both reaching new heights with each passing day. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a cute cartoon image of a bustling hospital, with a focus on a newborn named Gina cradled in her mother's arms. In a nearby room, a group of brilliant individuals are brainstorming, each with a unique creative aura. Show the room filled with ideas floating as ethereal forms while the videos of 3Blue1Brown's YouTube channel is visually represented as a growing entity, mirroring the rise of Gina's popularity. The atmosphere should exude a sense of creativity and growth, with a noticeable parallel between the narratives being spun and the baby's rise in popularity.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the first name Gina positively influenced Total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Gina-ray Correlation: A Cinematic Analysis of 3Blue1Brown Videos

The Journal of Cinematic Mathematics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gina and Total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8494270 and p < 0.01 for 2015 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Gina-ray Correlation: A Cinematic Analysis of 3Blue1Brown Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the often overlooked and underappreciated relationship between the popularity of the first name Gina and the total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube archives, our research team delved into this peculiar association. The analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8494270 with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2015 to 2022, indicating a statistically significant link between the two variables. The implications of this unexpected connection are intriguing and may shed light on the perplexing interplay between individual monikers and the length of educational video content. These findings challenge traditional assumptions about the determinants of video duration and prompt further exploration into the whimsical world of nomenclature quirks and online educational productions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gina and Total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Gina-ray Correlation: A Cinematic Analysis of 3Blue1Brown Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the often overlooked and underappreciated relationship between the popularity of the first name Gina and the total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube archives, our research team delved into this peculiar association. The analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8494270 with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2015 to 2022, indicating a statistically significant link between the two variables. The implications of this unexpected connection are intriguing and may shed light on the perplexing interplay between individual monikers and the length of educational video content. These findings challenge traditional assumptions about the determinants of video duration and prompt further exploration into the whimsical world of nomenclature quirks and online educational productions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of quantitative analysis and seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a source of both fascination and head-scratching in the field of research. In this study, we embark on a journey through the convoluted corridors of data analysis to explore a correlation that may at first glance appear whimsical and esoteric – the relationship between the prevalence of the first name Gina and the total duration of 3Blue1Brown instructional videos. While the connection between nomenclature and multimedia content duration may seem, well, unconventional, our investigation has revealed compelling insights that broaden our understanding of both statistical relationships and the idiosyncrasies of human behavior.

The concept of correlation, an essential tool in statistical analysis, allows us to quantify the degree of association between two variables. In the case of the present study, we are confronted with a pair of seemingly unrelated entities. On one hand, the popularity of the first name Gina, influenced by myriad cultural and social factors, and on the other, the collective runtime of 3Blue1Brown videos, which serves as a vessel for mathematical enlightenment and pedagogical discourse. As we delve into this markedly unexplored nexus, our aim is not only to uncover evidence of a statistical relationship but also to embrace the whimsy and unexpected dimensions of this peculiar liaison.

The domain of YouTube content creation, particularly within the realm of educational material, has burgeoned in recent years, carrying with it a myriad of elements that ostensibly dictate the forms and depths of delivery. Concurrently, the ebb and flow of favored appellations have sparkled their way into the social fabric, bearing witness to the cyclical zeitgeist of naming conventions. Our investigation seeks to discern if, within this landscape of digital pedagogy and societal naming trends, a subtle dance between the designation of “Gina” and the expanse of instructional video length transpires.

Amidst the solemnity of quantitative analysis, we must not overlook the occasional ripples of irony and intrigue that undulate beneath the surface. To that end, we invite the reader to embark on this academic excursion with a dose of statistical rigor and a wink towards the unanticipated connections that await in the annals of data-driven discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gina and Total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Gina-ray Correlation: A Cinematic Analysis of 3Blue1Brown Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the often overlooked and underappreciated relationship between the popularity of the first name Gina and the total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube archives, our research team delved into this peculiar association. The analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8494270 with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2015 to 2022, indicating a statistically significant link between the two variables. The implications of this unexpected connection are intriguing and may shed light on the perplexing interplay between individual monikers and the length of educational video content. These findings challenge traditional assumptions about the determinants of video duration and prompt further exploration into the whimsical world of nomenclature quirks and online educational productions.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of quantitative analysis and seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a source of both fascination and head-scratching in the field of research. In this study, we embark on a journey through the convoluted corridors of data analysis to explore a correlation that may at first glance appear whimsical and esoteric – the relationship between the prevalence of the first name Gina and the total duration of 3Blue1Brown instructional videos. While the connection between nomenclature and multimedia content duration may seem, well, unconventional, our investigation has revealed compelling insights that broaden our understanding of both statistical relationships and the idiosyncrasies of human behavior.
The concept of correlation, an essential tool in statistical analysis, allows us to quantify the degree of association between two variables. In the case of the present study, we are confronted with a pair of seemingly unrelated entities. On one hand, the popularity of the first name Gina, influenced by myriad cultural and social factors, and on the other, the collective runtime of 3Blue1Brown videos, which serves as a vessel for mathematical enlightenment and pedagogical discourse. As we delve into this markedly unexplored nexus, our aim is not only to uncover evidence of a statistical relationship but also to embrace the whimsy and unexpected dimensions of this peculiar liaison.
The domain of YouTube content creation, particularly within the realm of educational material, has burgeoned in recent years, carrying with it a myriad of elements that ostensibly dictate the forms and depths of delivery. Concurrently, the ebb and flow of favored appellations have sparkled their way into the social fabric, bearing witness to the cyclical zeitgeist of naming conventions. Our investigation seeks to discern if, within this landscape of digital pedagogy and societal naming trends, a subtle dance between the designation of “Gina” and the expanse of instructional video length transpires.
Amidst the solemnity of quantitative analysis, we must not overlook the occasional ripples of irony and intrigue that undulate beneath the surface. To that end, we invite the reader to embark on this academic excursion with a dose of statistical rigor and a wink towards the unanticipated connections that await in the annals of data-driven discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

A survey of the existing literature has unveiled an assortment of studies that delve into the enigmatic realm of nomenclature dynamics and multimedia content duration, albeit not in the specific context of the Gina-ray Correlation. Smith (2017) conducted an analysis of name popularity and its influence on social behavior, revealing intriguing patterns that extend beyond mere nomenclature. Meanwhile, Doe (2019) explored the impact of YouTube video length on viewer engagement, shedding light on the intricate nuances of online content consumption.

Delving into the realm of non-fiction literature, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offers a compelling exploration of seemingly unrelated phenomena and the underlying forces that drive them, mirroring the intricacies of the Gina-ray Correlation. In a similar vein, "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell presents a captivating examination of societal trends and their unexpected origins, a concept that resonates with the unearthing of this peculiar statistical relationship.

In the realm of fiction, the seminal work "The Name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco, while not directly related to statistical analysis, encapsulates the captivating allure of unraveling mysterious connections, an experience akin to the unearthing of the Gina-ray Correlation. Furthermore, the whimsical intrigue of "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" by Lewis Carroll reflects the unexpected discoveries that await those who venture into the realms of statistical exploration and unanticipated associations.

Moreover, an intriguing social media post by a YouTube enthusiast under the handle @MathMaverick elucidated the notion of serendipitous correlations between names and content duration, propelling the discourse beyond traditional academic channels and into the digital sphere where such peculiar associations take root.

As evidenced by the wealth of literature spanning disciplines from sociology to popular culture, the undercurrents of statistical relationships and whimsical discoveries often lurk beneath the surface of seemingly disparate phenomena, offering a touch of mirth and wonder to the sometimes austere landscape of quantitative analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gina and Total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and YouTube . You used data from 2015 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Gina-ray Correlation: A Cinematic Analysis of 3Blue1Brown Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the often overlooked and underappreciated relationship between the popularity of the first name Gina and the total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube archives, our research team delved into this peculiar association. The analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8494270 with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2015 to 2022, indicating a statistically significant link between the two variables. The implications of this unexpected connection are intriguing and may shed light on the perplexing interplay between individual monikers and the length of educational video content. These findings challenge traditional assumptions about the determinants of video duration and prompt further exploration into the whimsical world of nomenclature quirks and online educational productions.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of quantitative analysis and seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a source of both fascination and head-scratching in the field of research. In this study, we embark on a journey through the convoluted corridors of data analysis to explore a correlation that may at first glance appear whimsical and esoteric – the relationship between the prevalence of the first name Gina and the total duration of 3Blue1Brown instructional videos. While the connection between nomenclature and multimedia content duration may seem, well, unconventional, our investigation has revealed compelling insights that broaden our understanding of both statistical relationships and the idiosyncrasies of human behavior.
The concept of correlation, an essential tool in statistical analysis, allows us to quantify the degree of association between two variables. In the case of the present study, we are confronted with a pair of seemingly unrelated entities. On one hand, the popularity of the first name Gina, influenced by myriad cultural and social factors, and on the other, the collective runtime of 3Blue1Brown videos, which serves as a vessel for mathematical enlightenment and pedagogical discourse. As we delve into this markedly unexplored nexus, our aim is not only to uncover evidence of a statistical relationship but also to embrace the whimsy and unexpected dimensions of this peculiar liaison.
The domain of YouTube content creation, particularly within the realm of educational material, has burgeoned in recent years, carrying with it a myriad of elements that ostensibly dictate the forms and depths of delivery. Concurrently, the ebb and flow of favored appellations have sparkled their way into the social fabric, bearing witness to the cyclical zeitgeist of naming conventions. Our investigation seeks to discern if, within this landscape of digital pedagogy and societal naming trends, a subtle dance between the designation of “Gina” and the expanse of instructional video length transpires.
Amidst the solemnity of quantitative analysis, we must not overlook the occasional ripples of irony and intrigue that undulate beneath the surface. To that end, we invite the reader to embark on this academic excursion with a dose of statistical rigor and a wink towards the unanticipated connections that await in the annals of data-driven discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To tackle the enigmatic relationship between the popularity of the first name Gina and the total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos, our research team embarked on a quest that blended elements of data scraping, nomenclature pondering, and number crunching. First, we pored over the voluminous archives of the US Social Security Administration to glean insights into the prevalence of the name Gina from 2015 to 2022. With our browsers ablaze and our Excel sheets at the ready, we meticulously extracted this data, navigating through the colorful mosaic of baby naming trends with the dexterity of lexical cartographers.

Simultaneously, we delved into the labyrinthine corridors of the 3Blue1Brown YouTube channel, cataloging and calculating the cumulative duration of their instructional content. Much like intrepid spelunkers of the digital caverns, we meticulously charted the temporal landscape of mathematical musings and visual expositions, carefully noting each video's length with the expertise and dedication of number aficionados.

With the zeal of treasure hunters unearthing hidden gems, we then merged these disparate datasets to forge a cohesive tapestry of nomenclature and numerical harmony. Adopting the mantle of statistical sleuths, we employed robust techniques such as Pearson's correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis to unearth the underlying patterns and unveil the clandestine rapport between the name Gina and the lengths of 3Blue1Brown videos.

Furthermore, we harnessed the power of time series analysis to trace the ebbs and flows of Gina's popularity and the fluctuations in video duration across the years. This allowed us to discern not just a static connection, but a dynamic tango between the eponymous name and the evolving landscape of instructional cinematography.

In an attempt to bolster the credibility of our findings and assuage the specter of spurious correlation, we also explored alternative explanations and control variables. To that end, we scrutinized other popular given names and sought to elucidate their potential influence on the length of educational content, effectively treading the hallowed grounds of statistical control amid the idiosyncrasies of nomenclatural whimsy.

In crafting this methodology, we not only navigated the twists and turns of data compilation and analysis but also reveled in the serendipity and wry humor that punctuated our scientific escapade. Through this mosaic of data handling and statistical inquiry, we attempted to balance the rigors of methodological rigor with the levity of scholarly exploration, ultimately birthing a methodology that reflected both precision and the playful spirit of scientific discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gina and Total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and YouTube .

For the time period 2015 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8494270, r-squared of 0.7215262, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Gina-ray Correlation: A Cinematic Analysis of 3Blue1Brown Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the often overlooked and underappreciated relationship between the popularity of the first name Gina and the total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube archives, our research team delved into this peculiar association. The analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8494270 with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2015 to 2022, indicating a statistically significant link between the two variables. The implications of this unexpected connection are intriguing and may shed light on the perplexing interplay between individual monikers and the length of educational video content. These findings challenge traditional assumptions about the determinants of video duration and prompt further exploration into the whimsical world of nomenclature quirks and online educational productions.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of quantitative analysis and seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a source of both fascination and head-scratching in the field of research. In this study, we embark on a journey through the convoluted corridors of data analysis to explore a correlation that may at first glance appear whimsical and esoteric – the relationship between the prevalence of the first name Gina and the total duration of 3Blue1Brown instructional videos. While the connection between nomenclature and multimedia content duration may seem, well, unconventional, our investigation has revealed compelling insights that broaden our understanding of both statistical relationships and the idiosyncrasies of human behavior.
The concept of correlation, an essential tool in statistical analysis, allows us to quantify the degree of association between two variables. In the case of the present study, we are confronted with a pair of seemingly unrelated entities. On one hand, the popularity of the first name Gina, influenced by myriad cultural and social factors, and on the other, the collective runtime of 3Blue1Brown videos, which serves as a vessel for mathematical enlightenment and pedagogical discourse. As we delve into this markedly unexplored nexus, our aim is not only to uncover evidence of a statistical relationship but also to embrace the whimsy and unexpected dimensions of this peculiar liaison.
The domain of YouTube content creation, particularly within the realm of educational material, has burgeoned in recent years, carrying with it a myriad of elements that ostensibly dictate the forms and depths of delivery. Concurrently, the ebb and flow of favored appellations have sparkled their way into the social fabric, bearing witness to the cyclical zeitgeist of naming conventions. Our investigation seeks to discern if, within this landscape of digital pedagogy and societal naming trends, a subtle dance between the designation of “Gina” and the expanse of instructional video length transpires.
Amidst the solemnity of quantitative analysis, we must not overlook the occasional ripples of irony and intrigue that undulate beneath the surface. To that end, we invite the reader to embark on this academic excursion with a dose of statistical rigor and a wink towards the unanticipated connections that await in the annals of data-driven discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data spanning from 2015 to 2022 revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8494270 between the prevalence of the first name Gina and the total duration of 3Blue1Brown instructional videos. This result indicates a remarkably high degree of association between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.7215262 further corroborates the strength of this relationship, suggesting that approximately 72% of the variation in video length can be explained by the prevalence of the name Gina. This finding, coupled with a p-value less than 0.01, attests to the statistical significance of the observed correlation.

The implications of this unexpected connection are as intriguing as a cliffhanger in a mystery novel. This unanticipated correlation challenges traditional assumptions about the determinants of video duration, prompting further exploration into the whimsical world of nomenclature quirks and the intriguing link to online educational productions. The strength of the association certainly raises an eyebrow and invites further contemplation on the potential influences that our chosen names may exert on the content we consume and create, not to mention the potential impact on the multiverse of YouTube's educational landscape.

One of the most compelling pieces of evidence supporting this correlation is the visually delightful scatterplot depicted in Figure 1. This scatterplot portrays the strong positive correlation between the prevalence of the name Gina and the length of 3Blue1Brown videos, providing a graphical manifestation of the statistical relationship uncovered in this investigation. It beckons the viewer to ponder the curious connection that appears to weave through the fabric of these ostensibly distant domains, teasing the imagination with the prospect of a whimsical interplay between nomenclature and multimedia content duration.

In conclusion, our findings yield more than just numbers and trends; they beckon us to embrace the unexpected and to open our minds to the enchanting ballet of statistical relationships that transcend the bounds of convention. The Gina-ray correlation stands as a testament to the wondrous unpredictability of data analysis, reminding us that even in the realm of statistics, laughter and serendipity are never too far from the formula.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gina and Total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Gina-ray Correlation: A Cinematic Analysis of 3Blue1Brown Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the often overlooked and underappreciated relationship between the popularity of the first name Gina and the total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube archives, our research team delved into this peculiar association. The analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8494270 with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2015 to 2022, indicating a statistically significant link between the two variables. The implications of this unexpected connection are intriguing and may shed light on the perplexing interplay between individual monikers and the length of educational video content. These findings challenge traditional assumptions about the determinants of video duration and prompt further exploration into the whimsical world of nomenclature quirks and online educational productions.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
A survey of the existing literature has unveiled an assortment of studies that delve into the enigmatic realm of nomenclature dynamics and multimedia content duration, albeit not in the specific context of the Gina-ray Correlation. Smith (2017) conducted an analysis of name popularity and its influence on social behavior, revealing intriguing patterns that extend beyond mere nomenclature. Meanwhile, Doe (2019) explored the impact of YouTube video length on viewer engagement, shedding light on the intricate nuances of online content consumption.
Delving into the realm of non-fiction literature, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offers a compelling exploration of seemingly unrelated phenomena and the underlying forces that drive them, mirroring the intricacies of the Gina-ray Correlation. In a similar vein, "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell presents a captivating examination of societal trends and their unexpected origins, a concept that resonates with the unearthing of this peculiar statistical relationship.
In the realm of fiction, the seminal work "The Name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco, while not directly related to statistical analysis, encapsulates the captivating allure of unraveling mysterious connections, an experience akin to the unearthing of the Gina-ray Correlation. Furthermore, the whimsical intrigue of "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" by Lewis Carroll reflects the unexpected discoveries that await those who venture into the realms of statistical exploration and unanticipated associations.
Moreover, an intriguing social media post by a YouTube enthusiast under the handle @MathMaverick elucidated the notion of serendipitous correlations between names and content duration, propelling the discourse beyond traditional academic channels and into the digital sphere where such peculiar associations take root.
As evidenced by the wealth of literature spanning disciplines from sociology to popular culture, the undercurrents of statistical relationships and whimsical discoveries often lurk beneath the surface of seemingly disparate phenomena, offering a touch of mirth and wonder to the sometimes austere landscape of quantitative analysis.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data spanning from 2015 to 2022 revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8494270 between the prevalence of the first name Gina and the total duration of 3Blue1Brown instructional videos. This result indicates a remarkably high degree of association between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.7215262 further corroborates the strength of this relationship, suggesting that approximately 72% of the variation in video length can be explained by the prevalence of the name Gina. This finding, coupled with a p-value less than 0.01, attests to the statistical significance of the observed correlation.
The implications of this unexpected connection are as intriguing as a cliffhanger in a mystery novel. This unanticipated correlation challenges traditional assumptions about the determinants of video duration, prompting further exploration into the whimsical world of nomenclature quirks and the intriguing link to online educational productions. The strength of the association certainly raises an eyebrow and invites further contemplation on the potential influences that our chosen names may exert on the content we consume and create, not to mention the potential impact on the multiverse of YouTube's educational landscape.
One of the most compelling pieces of evidence supporting this correlation is the visually delightful scatterplot depicted in Figure 1. This scatterplot portrays the strong positive correlation between the prevalence of the name Gina and the length of 3Blue1Brown videos, providing a graphical manifestation of the statistical relationship uncovered in this investigation. It beckons the viewer to ponder the curious connection that appears to weave through the fabric of these ostensibly distant domains, teasing the imagination with the prospect of a whimsical interplay between nomenclature and multimedia content duration.
In conclusion, our findings yield more than just numbers and trends; they beckon us to embrace the unexpected and to open our minds to the enchanting ballet of statistical relationships that transcend the bounds of convention. The Gina-ray correlation stands as a testament to the wondrous unpredictability of data analysis, reminding us that even in the realm of statistics, laughter and serendipity are never too far from the formula.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation delved into the enchanting confluence of nomenclature and video duration, unearthing a statistically significant association between the prevalence of the first name Gina and the length of 3Blue1Brown instructional videos. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8494270 observed in our study mirrors the whimsical nature of statistical exploration, akin to stumbling upon a treasure trove of hidden connections in the labyrinthine maze of data. Our findings align with previous research by Smith (2017) on the influence of name popularity on social behavior, reinforcing the notion that names carry an inexplicable potency that extends beyond mere nomenclature. Furthermore, our results align with the work of Doe (2019), shedding light on the intricate nuances of online content consumption and the potential influences at play.

The rich tapestry of literature reviewed in the lead-up to our study reflects the delightful unpredictability of statistical exploration. The seemingly unrelated phenomena examined by Levitt and Dubner in "Freakonomics" parallel the discovery of the Gina-ray Correlation, underscoring the capricious nature of statistical associations that defy traditional expectations. The allusions to "The Name of the Rose" and "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" resonate with the unexpected discoveries that await those who venture into the whimsical realm of statistical exploration, capturing the essence of our serendipitous findings. Even the lighthearted social media post by @MathMaverick poignantly underscored the notion of uncanny statistical correlations, affirming the resonance of our study within the digital landscape.

The visual manifestation of our findings in the scatterplot is reminiscent of a theatrical performance, with the prevalence of the name Gina and the duration of 3Blue1Brown videos waltzing across the Cartesian stage in perfect harmony. This striking visual encapsulates the essence of our discovery, beckoning the observer to contemplate the enthralling interplay between nomenclature and multimedia content duration. Our results unveil a whimsical narrative that transcends conventional expectations, evoking a sense of wonder akin to stumbling upon an Easter egg in the labyrinth of statistical analysis.

Our study stands as a testament to the delightful unpredictability of statistical exploration, embracing the unexpected with open arms. The Gina-ray Correlation serves as a gentle reminder that even in the realm of statistics, laughter and serendipity are never too far from the equation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gina and Total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Gina-ray Correlation: A Cinematic Analysis of 3Blue1Brown Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the often overlooked and underappreciated relationship between the popularity of the first name Gina and the total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube archives, our research team delved into this peculiar association. The analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8494270 with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2015 to 2022, indicating a statistically significant link between the two variables. The implications of this unexpected connection are intriguing and may shed light on the perplexing interplay between individual monikers and the length of educational video content. These findings challenge traditional assumptions about the determinants of video duration and prompt further exploration into the whimsical world of nomenclature quirks and online educational productions.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of quantitative analysis and seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a source of both fascination and head-scratching in the field of research. In this study, we embark on a journey through the convoluted corridors of data analysis to explore a correlation that may at first glance appear whimsical and esoteric – the relationship between the prevalence of the first name Gina and the total duration of 3Blue1Brown instructional videos. While the connection between nomenclature and multimedia content duration may seem, well, unconventional, our investigation has revealed compelling insights that broaden our understanding of both statistical relationships and the idiosyncrasies of human behavior.
The concept of correlation, an essential tool in statistical analysis, allows us to quantify the degree of association between two variables. In the case of the present study, we are confronted with a pair of seemingly unrelated entities. On one hand, the popularity of the first name Gina, influenced by myriad cultural and social factors, and on the other, the collective runtime of 3Blue1Brown videos, which serves as a vessel for mathematical enlightenment and pedagogical discourse. As we delve into this markedly unexplored nexus, our aim is not only to uncover evidence of a statistical relationship but also to embrace the whimsy and unexpected dimensions of this peculiar liaison.
The domain of YouTube content creation, particularly within the realm of educational material, has burgeoned in recent years, carrying with it a myriad of elements that ostensibly dictate the forms and depths of delivery. Concurrently, the ebb and flow of favored appellations have sparkled their way into the social fabric, bearing witness to the cyclical zeitgeist of naming conventions. Our investigation seeks to discern if, within this landscape of digital pedagogy and societal naming trends, a subtle dance between the designation of “Gina” and the expanse of instructional video length transpires.
Amidst the solemnity of quantitative analysis, we must not overlook the occasional ripples of irony and intrigue that undulate beneath the surface. To that end, we invite the reader to embark on this academic excursion with a dose of statistical rigor and a wink towards the unanticipated connections that await in the annals of data-driven discovery.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data spanning from 2015 to 2022 revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8494270 between the prevalence of the first name Gina and the total duration of 3Blue1Brown instructional videos. This result indicates a remarkably high degree of association between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.7215262 further corroborates the strength of this relationship, suggesting that approximately 72% of the variation in video length can be explained by the prevalence of the name Gina. This finding, coupled with a p-value less than 0.01, attests to the statistical significance of the observed correlation.
The implications of this unexpected connection are as intriguing as a cliffhanger in a mystery novel. This unanticipated correlation challenges traditional assumptions about the determinants of video duration, prompting further exploration into the whimsical world of nomenclature quirks and the intriguing link to online educational productions. The strength of the association certainly raises an eyebrow and invites further contemplation on the potential influences that our chosen names may exert on the content we consume and create, not to mention the potential impact on the multiverse of YouTube's educational landscape.
One of the most compelling pieces of evidence supporting this correlation is the visually delightful scatterplot depicted in Figure 1. This scatterplot portrays the strong positive correlation between the prevalence of the name Gina and the length of 3Blue1Brown videos, providing a graphical manifestation of the statistical relationship uncovered in this investigation. It beckons the viewer to ponder the curious connection that appears to weave through the fabric of these ostensibly distant domains, teasing the imagination with the prospect of a whimsical interplay between nomenclature and multimedia content duration.
In conclusion, our findings yield more than just numbers and trends; they beckon us to embrace the unexpected and to open our minds to the enchanting ballet of statistical relationships that transcend the bounds of convention. The Gina-ray correlation stands as a testament to the wondrous unpredictability of data analysis, reminding us that even in the realm of statistics, laughter and serendipity are never too far from the formula.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the culmination of our investigation, we have navigated through the labyrinthine landscape of statistical analysis to unearth a correlation that tantalizingly transcends the ordinary. The connection between the prevalence of the name Gina and the total duration of 3Blue1Brown instructional videos, as evidenced by the strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8494270 and the r-squared value of 0.7215262, evokes a sense of whimsy and wonder. Our findings, akin to a surprising plot twist, invite contemplation on the entwined nature of nomenclature trends and multimedia content durations.

As we bid adieu to this research venture, it is evident that the Gina-ray correlation is not merely a statistical oddity; it is a testament to the delightful unpredictability of the data-driven world. This discovery prompts us to appreciate the unanticipated interconnections that underpin our empirical endeavors and beckons us to consider the myriad ways in which the fabric of human experience weaves through the tapestry of statistical relationships.

In the spirit of scientific inquiry, we have embraced the giddy dance of statistical discovery and the capricious charm of unanticipated connections. However, in the realm of the Gina-ray correlation, it seems that further research may be as unnecessary as a second spoon while eating soup - the mystery has been well and truly dissected. Thus, we may confidently assert that in this thoroughly explored domain, the last laugh belongs to the statistical significance of the delightful Gina-ray correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Gina-ray Correlation: A Cinematic Analysis of 3Blue1Brown Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Cinematic Mathematics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Gina-ray Correlation: A Cinematic Analysis of 3Blue1Brown Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Cognitive Cinematic Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Gina-ray Correlation: A Cinematic Analysis of 3Blue1Brown Videos with an abstract of This study investigates the often overlooked and underappreciated relationship between the popularity of the first name Gina and the total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube archives, our research team delved into this peculiar association. The analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8494270 with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2015 to 2022, indicating a statistically significant link between the two variables. The implications of this unexpected connection are intriguing and may shed light on the perplexing interplay between individual monikers and the length of educational video content. These findings challenge traditional assumptions about the determinants of video duration and prompt further exploration into the whimsical world of nomenclature quirks and online educational productions.

ChatGPT:

Gina, 3Blue1Brown, YouTube, correlation, name popularity, video length, US Social Security Administration, educational videos, data analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Gina
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Gina
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Gina

Total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.8494270 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7215262 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 72.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Gina) over the 8 years from 2015 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0076. 0.0075997823779029850000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 0.76% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 132 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.36, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Gina (Babies born)10311412511311912910699
Total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos (Total length in seconds)28491563028443155481346351011102699578




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  6. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([103,114,125,113,119,129,106,99,])
array_2 = np.array([2849,15630,28443,15548,13463,51011,10269,9578,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Gina"
array_2_name = "Total length of 3Blue1Brown YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 4561 · Black Variable ID: 2463 · Red Variable ID: 25831
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0