about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,517 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How nerdy Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are and the second variable is The number of phlebotomists in Tennessee.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the nerdy Stand-up Maths videos become more popular, there is a corresponding surge in demand for blood pressure monitors among fans. This leads to an unexpected shortage of phlebotomists in Tennessee, as they are all too busy taking the blood pressure of math enthusiasts instead of performing their usual duties. It seems the formula for attracting phlebotomists in Tennessee involves injecting a healthy dose of nerdiness!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALL·E-3, using the following style: [ a humorous cartoon ] and depicting this scene: A group of excited math enthusiasts gather on a lively street, clutching blood pressure monitors, and energetically chatting about the latest Stand-up Maths video releases. Meanwhile, a long line of patients waiting for a phlebotomist stretches from a hospital entrance. Oddly, the phlebotomists are absent, as they are all happily engaged in the math discussions, measuring blood pressure and cheerfully exploring mathematical concepts. Image Generation Prompt: Produce an image portraying this amusing scenario, using a cartoon style with lively colors and dynamic facial expressions to capture the enthusiasm of the math enthusiasts. Emphasize the contrast between the bustling street and the patient-filled hospital doorway to convey the humorous irony of the situation. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How nerdy Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and The number of phlebotomists in Tennessee. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Pop art Cyber folk a meme Futuristic Minimalism
ChatGPT: a meme

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How nerdy Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and The number of phlebotomists in Tennessee, in the following situation: As the nerdy Stand-up Maths videos become more popular, there is a corresponding surge in demand for blood pressure monitors among fans. This leads to an unexpected shortage of phlebotomists in Tennessee, as they are all too busy taking the blood pressure of math enthusiasts instead of performing their usual duties. It seems the formula for attracting phlebotomists in Tennessee involves injecting a healthy dose of nerdiness!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A crowd of math enthusiasts gathers in a bustling street, holding blood pressure monitors and eagerly discussing the latest nerdy Stand-up Maths video titles. Meanwhile, a line of people stretches out from a hospital as patients wait for a phlebotomist to draw their blood. However, the phlebotomists are nowhere to be seen, as they are all among the excited math fans, taking blood pressure readings and discussing the intricacies of mathematical concepts.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a meme ] and depicting this scene: A crowd of math enthusiasts gathers in a bustling street, holding blood pressure monitors and eagerly discussing the latest nerdy Stand-up Maths video titles. Meanwhile, a line of people stretches out from a hospital as patients wait for a phlebotomist to draw their blood. However, the phlebotomists are nowhere to be seen, as they are all among the excited math fans, taking blood pressure readings and discussing the intricacies of mathematical concepts. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALL·E-3, using the following style: [ a humorous cartoon ] and depicting this scene: A group of excited math enthusiasts gather on a lively street, clutching blood pressure monitors, and energetically chatting about the latest Stand-up Maths video releases. Meanwhile, a long line of patients waiting for a phlebotomist stretches from a hospital entrance. Oddly, the phlebotomists are absent, as they are all happily engaged in the math discussions, measuring blood pressure and cheerfully exploring mathematical concepts. Image Generation Prompt: Produce an image portraying this amusing scenario, using a cartoon style with lively colors and dynamic facial expressions to capture the enthusiasm of the math enthusiasts. Emphasize the contrast between the bustling street and the patient-filled hospital doorway to convey the humorous irony of the situation.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in How nerdy Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are positively influenced The number of phlebotomists in Tennessee.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Draw Blood and Derive Laughs: The Correlation Between Nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Phlebotomists in Tennessee

The Journal of Comedic Research and Niche Correlations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and The number of phlebotomists in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8782664 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Draw Blood and Derive Laughs: The Correlation Between Nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Phlebotomists in Tennessee"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the intriguing relationship between nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube video titles and the number of phlebotomists in the great state of Tennessee. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we set out to answer the age-old question: do the mathematical musings of Matt Parker and his fellow nerdy YouTubers have any impact on the demand for phlebotomists? To our surprise and amusement, we found a remarkably strong correlation (r = 0.8782664) and statistically significant results (p < 0.01) from 2012 to 2022. Our findings suggest that the quirky, derivative humor inherent in these video titles may indeed be influencing the career choices of Tennessean blood-drawers. This study not only sheds light on an unexplored area of research but also serves as a whimsical reminder that correlations, though statistically sound, can sometimes leave us scratching our heads and laughing heartily at the bizarre connections found in the world of data analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and The number of phlebotomists in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Draw Blood and Derive Laughs: The Correlation Between Nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Phlebotomists in Tennessee"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the intriguing relationship between nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube video titles and the number of phlebotomists in the great state of Tennessee. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we set out to answer the age-old question: do the mathematical musings of Matt Parker and his fellow nerdy YouTubers have any impact on the demand for phlebotomists? To our surprise and amusement, we found a remarkably strong correlation (r = 0.8782664) and statistically significant results (p < 0.01) from 2012 to 2022. Our findings suggest that the quirky, derivative humor inherent in these video titles may indeed be influencing the career choices of Tennessean blood-drawers. This study not only sheds light on an unexplored area of research but also serves as a whimsical reminder that correlations, though statistically sound, can sometimes leave us scratching our heads and laughing heartily at the bizarre connections found in the world of data analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The intersection of mathematics, comedy, and blood may seem like a Venn diagram with little overlap, but our research aims to prove that there's more correlation than expected. In this study, we delve into the peculiar realm of nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube video titles and their potential influence on the number of phlebotomists in Tennessee. The seemingly disparate worlds of mathematical musings and venipuncture converge in an unexpected dance of data analysis, with results that are as surprising as they are entertaining.

As Albert Einstein famously remarked, "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Similarly, the only reason for this study is to explore the quirky and somewhat whimsical connection between two seemingly unrelated variables. We sought to discern whether the clever, pun-laden titles of nerdy math-related YouTube videos have any discernible impact on the demand for phlebotomists in the Volunteer State. This inquiry may seem far-fetched to some, but as researchers, it is our duty to explore the uncharted territories of statistical whimsy.

Our endeavor was not only driven by scientific curiosity but also a quest for a good laugh. After all, who said statistical analysis couldn't be infused with a healthy dose of levity? It is in this spirit of academic mirth that we embarked upon our investigation, armed with regression analyses, p-values, and an array of math-related puns.

The stage is set, the audience is seated, and the data is awaiting its moment in the spotlight. Join us as we unravel the mysteries behind the relationship between nerdy mathematical humor and the noble art of bloodletting. As we venture forth into uncharted statistical territory, we are reminded of the sage words of the comedic mathematician, Matt Parker, who said, "Mathematics may not teach us to add love or subtract hate, but it gives us hope that every problem has a solution." In the case of our research, the problem at hand is determining the degree to which Stand-Up Maths titles impact phlebotomist numbers, and we hope to do so with a hearty dose of humor and scientific rigor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and The number of phlebotomists in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Draw Blood and Derive Laughs: The Correlation Between Nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Phlebotomists in Tennessee"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the intriguing relationship between nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube video titles and the number of phlebotomists in the great state of Tennessee. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we set out to answer the age-old question: do the mathematical musings of Matt Parker and his fellow nerdy YouTubers have any impact on the demand for phlebotomists? To our surprise and amusement, we found a remarkably strong correlation (r = 0.8782664) and statistically significant results (p < 0.01) from 2012 to 2022. Our findings suggest that the quirky, derivative humor inherent in these video titles may indeed be influencing the career choices of Tennessean blood-drawers. This study not only sheds light on an unexplored area of research but also serves as a whimsical reminder that correlations, though statistically sound, can sometimes leave us scratching our heads and laughing heartily at the bizarre connections found in the world of data analysis.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of mathematics, comedy, and blood may seem like a Venn diagram with little overlap, but our research aims to prove that there's more correlation than expected. In this study, we delve into the peculiar realm of nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube video titles and their potential influence on the number of phlebotomists in Tennessee. The seemingly disparate worlds of mathematical musings and venipuncture converge in an unexpected dance of data analysis, with results that are as surprising as they are entertaining.
As Albert Einstein famously remarked, "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Similarly, the only reason for this study is to explore the quirky and somewhat whimsical connection between two seemingly unrelated variables. We sought to discern whether the clever, pun-laden titles of nerdy math-related YouTube videos have any discernible impact on the demand for phlebotomists in the Volunteer State. This inquiry may seem far-fetched to some, but as researchers, it is our duty to explore the uncharted territories of statistical whimsy.
Our endeavor was not only driven by scientific curiosity but also a quest for a good laugh. After all, who said statistical analysis couldn't be infused with a healthy dose of levity? It is in this spirit of academic mirth that we embarked upon our investigation, armed with regression analyses, p-values, and an array of math-related puns.
The stage is set, the audience is seated, and the data is awaiting its moment in the spotlight. Join us as we unravel the mysteries behind the relationship between nerdy mathematical humor and the noble art of bloodletting. As we venture forth into uncharted statistical territory, we are reminded of the sage words of the comedic mathematician, Matt Parker, who said, "Mathematics may not teach us to add love or subtract hate, but it gives us hope that every problem has a solution." In the case of our research, the problem at hand is determining the degree to which Stand-Up Maths titles impact phlebotomist numbers, and we hope to do so with a hearty dose of humor and scientific rigor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the demand for phlebotomists in Tennessee has been steadily increasing over the past decade, with projections indicating a sustained need for skilled blood-drawers in the region. Conversely, "Doe and Jones" suggest that the proliferation of nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos has reached an all-time high, captivating audiences with their blend of mathematical wit and comedic timing. These two seemingly unrelated trends piqued our curiosity and led us to investigate whether there could be a connection between them, or if our analytical lenses were simply fogged by the exhalations of laughter-

Bolstering our research, "The Art and Science of Phlebotomy" by "Smith" provides an in-depth analysis of the phlebotomy profession, detailing the intricate procedures and skills required to excel in the field. On the other hand, "Math Jokes 4 Mathy Folks" by "Gilliland" offers a humorous glimpse into the world of mathematical humor, setting the tone for our light-hearted exploration of the subject.

Expanding our search beyond non-fiction, we delved into the realms of fiction books that might conceivably bear a tangential relationship to our study. "Blood Meridian" by Cormac McCarthy certainly shares a thematic link with our investigation, albeit in a decidedly more macabre fashion. Similarly, the whimsical title "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" by Mark Haddon offers a nod to the investigative nature of our inquiry, albeit in a canine context rather than the vein-seeking pursuits of phlebotomists.

As diligent researchers, we left no stone unturned in our quest for insight, even resorting to unconventional sources of potential relevance. Let it be known that an exhaustive review of CVS receipts and fortune cookies was also undertaken, although the results of these endeavors remain dubious at best.

In the spirit of genuine inquiry and a touch of whimsical merriment, we now embark on our quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube video titles and the demand for phlebotomists in Tennessee. Fasten your seatbelts, for we are about to venture into a world where statistical analyses rub elbows with pun-laden titles, and where bloodletting meets comedic arithmetic.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and The number of phlebotomists in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Draw Blood and Derive Laughs: The Correlation Between Nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Phlebotomists in Tennessee"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the intriguing relationship between nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube video titles and the number of phlebotomists in the great state of Tennessee. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we set out to answer the age-old question: do the mathematical musings of Matt Parker and his fellow nerdy YouTubers have any impact on the demand for phlebotomists? To our surprise and amusement, we found a remarkably strong correlation (r = 0.8782664) and statistically significant results (p < 0.01) from 2012 to 2022. Our findings suggest that the quirky, derivative humor inherent in these video titles may indeed be influencing the career choices of Tennessean blood-drawers. This study not only sheds light on an unexplored area of research but also serves as a whimsical reminder that correlations, though statistically sound, can sometimes leave us scratching our heads and laughing heartily at the bizarre connections found in the world of data analysis.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of mathematics, comedy, and blood may seem like a Venn diagram with little overlap, but our research aims to prove that there's more correlation than expected. In this study, we delve into the peculiar realm of nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube video titles and their potential influence on the number of phlebotomists in Tennessee. The seemingly disparate worlds of mathematical musings and venipuncture converge in an unexpected dance of data analysis, with results that are as surprising as they are entertaining.
As Albert Einstein famously remarked, "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Similarly, the only reason for this study is to explore the quirky and somewhat whimsical connection between two seemingly unrelated variables. We sought to discern whether the clever, pun-laden titles of nerdy math-related YouTube videos have any discernible impact on the demand for phlebotomists in the Volunteer State. This inquiry may seem far-fetched to some, but as researchers, it is our duty to explore the uncharted territories of statistical whimsy.
Our endeavor was not only driven by scientific curiosity but also a quest for a good laugh. After all, who said statistical analysis couldn't be infused with a healthy dose of levity? It is in this spirit of academic mirth that we embarked upon our investigation, armed with regression analyses, p-values, and an array of math-related puns.
The stage is set, the audience is seated, and the data is awaiting its moment in the spotlight. Join us as we unravel the mysteries behind the relationship between nerdy mathematical humor and the noble art of bloodletting. As we venture forth into uncharted statistical territory, we are reminded of the sage words of the comedic mathematician, Matt Parker, who said, "Mathematics may not teach us to add love or subtract hate, but it gives us hope that every problem has a solution." In the case of our research, the problem at hand is determining the degree to which Stand-Up Maths titles impact phlebotomist numbers, and we hope to do so with a hearty dose of humor and scientific rigor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to uncover the mysterious relationship between nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube video titles and the number of phlebotomists in Tennessee, our research team ventured into the uncharted territory of statistical whimsy armed with an array of quirky research methods and an unyielding determination to find the correlation between math jokes and blood-drawing professionals. We combined cutting-edge AI analysis of YouTube video titles with Bureau of Labor Statistics data, because let's face it, what's more fun than AI and government stats?

First, we utilized state-of-the-art AI algorithms to analyze the nerdy, pun-laden titles of Stand-Up Maths videos. The AI was programmed to measure the level of puns per minute (PPM) in each video title, as well as any mathematical references and general nerdy humor. We like to call this method "Pun-derstanding Statistics," a clever play on "understanding" and "pun," of course. This rigorous process allowed us to quantify the nerdiness factor of each video title, ensuring that no pun was left uncounted.

Next, we dove into the Bureau of Labor Statistics data to extract the number of phlebotomists employed in Tennessee over the years 2012 to 2022. Our rigorous data collection process involved the strategic placement of virtual traps and statistical snares to capture the elusive numbers, which were then wrangled into a tidy dataset for analysis.

With our data in hand, we performed a series of rigorous statistical analyses, including correlation coefficient calculations, regression models, and hypothesis testing. Each algorithmic dance with the numbers was accompanied by an enthusiastic chorus of mathematical puns and the occasional celebratory high-five, because who says statistics can't be fun?

To ensure the validity of our findings, we employed robust controls for confounding variables, such as the influence of the popularity of the YouTube platform and the general trend in blood-related professions. Our statistical models were as finely tuned as a well-tempered clavier, ensuring that our conclusions were not just a fluke of random data but a robust exploration of the subtle dance between numbers and nerdy humor.

Finally, we engaged in a thorough sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness of our results and to ward off any statistical gremlins that may have been lurking in our dataset. This involved subjecting our findings to a battery of stress tests and statistical challenges, much like a rigorous boot camp for data points.

In summary, our methodology involved a blend of state-of-the-art AI analysis, meticulous data wrangling, statistical acrobatics, and a healthy dose of mathematical puns. With this arsenal of research methods, we embarked on our unorthodox quest to unravel the enigma behind the correlation between nerdy Stand-Up Maths titles and the noble profession of phlebotomy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and The number of phlebotomists in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8782664, r-squared of 0.7713519, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Draw Blood and Derive Laughs: The Correlation Between Nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Phlebotomists in Tennessee"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the intriguing relationship between nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube video titles and the number of phlebotomists in the great state of Tennessee. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we set out to answer the age-old question: do the mathematical musings of Matt Parker and his fellow nerdy YouTubers have any impact on the demand for phlebotomists? To our surprise and amusement, we found a remarkably strong correlation (r = 0.8782664) and statistically significant results (p < 0.01) from 2012 to 2022. Our findings suggest that the quirky, derivative humor inherent in these video titles may indeed be influencing the career choices of Tennessean blood-drawers. This study not only sheds light on an unexplored area of research but also serves as a whimsical reminder that correlations, though statistically sound, can sometimes leave us scratching our heads and laughing heartily at the bizarre connections found in the world of data analysis.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of mathematics, comedy, and blood may seem like a Venn diagram with little overlap, but our research aims to prove that there's more correlation than expected. In this study, we delve into the peculiar realm of nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube video titles and their potential influence on the number of phlebotomists in Tennessee. The seemingly disparate worlds of mathematical musings and venipuncture converge in an unexpected dance of data analysis, with results that are as surprising as they are entertaining.
As Albert Einstein famously remarked, "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Similarly, the only reason for this study is to explore the quirky and somewhat whimsical connection between two seemingly unrelated variables. We sought to discern whether the clever, pun-laden titles of nerdy math-related YouTube videos have any discernible impact on the demand for phlebotomists in the Volunteer State. This inquiry may seem far-fetched to some, but as researchers, it is our duty to explore the uncharted territories of statistical whimsy.
Our endeavor was not only driven by scientific curiosity but also a quest for a good laugh. After all, who said statistical analysis couldn't be infused with a healthy dose of levity? It is in this spirit of academic mirth that we embarked upon our investigation, armed with regression analyses, p-values, and an array of math-related puns.
The stage is set, the audience is seated, and the data is awaiting its moment in the spotlight. Join us as we unravel the mysteries behind the relationship between nerdy mathematical humor and the noble art of bloodletting. As we venture forth into uncharted statistical territory, we are reminded of the sage words of the comedic mathematician, Matt Parker, who said, "Mathematics may not teach us to add love or subtract hate, but it gives us hope that every problem has a solution." In the case of our research, the problem at hand is determining the degree to which Stand-Up Maths titles impact phlebotomist numbers, and we hope to do so with a hearty dose of humor and scientific rigor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a surprising and, dare I say, blood-curdling correlation between the nerdy Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the number of phlebotomists in Tennessee. Over the ten-year period from 2012 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.8782664, implying a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. For those less familiar with statistics, a correlation of 1 would indicate a perfect positive relationship, while a correlation of -1 would denote a perfect negative relationship. In this case, we're as close to perfect as you can get without a pocket protector.

Our r-squared value of 0.7713519 tells us that a whopping 77.1% of the variation in the number of phlebotomists can be explained by the variation in the nerdy video titles. This finding is quite remarkable, considering we started this research with the sneaking suspicion that our data had "got to be kidding me!"

What's even more astounding is that our p-value came in at less than 0.01, indicating that the relationship between the video titles and the number of phlebotomists is statistically significant. In the world of statistics, a p-value less than 0.01 is like finding a unicorn in the data – it's rare, eye-opening, and might make you wonder if you've had too much caffeine.

To visually drive home our findings, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that showcases the undeniable correlation between nerdy Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the number of phlebotomists in Tennessee. Although we aren't suggesting that mathematicians are secretly moonlighting as vampire hunters, the evidence in favor of a substantial connection between these variables is as clear as a full moon on a cloudless night.

In summary, our results provide compelling evidence that the whimsical, pun-filled titles of nerdy math videos can influence the demand for phlebotomists. As researchers, we can confidently say that we've "drawn blood" from this mysterious relationship and emerged with some truly enlightening – and amusing – findings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and The number of phlebotomists in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Draw Blood and Derive Laughs: The Correlation Between Nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Phlebotomists in Tennessee"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the intriguing relationship between nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube video titles and the number of phlebotomists in the great state of Tennessee. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we set out to answer the age-old question: do the mathematical musings of Matt Parker and his fellow nerdy YouTubers have any impact on the demand for phlebotomists? To our surprise and amusement, we found a remarkably strong correlation (r = 0.8782664) and statistically significant results (p < 0.01) from 2012 to 2022. Our findings suggest that the quirky, derivative humor inherent in these video titles may indeed be influencing the career choices of Tennessean blood-drawers. This study not only sheds light on an unexplored area of research but also serves as a whimsical reminder that correlations, though statistically sound, can sometimes leave us scratching our heads and laughing heartily at the bizarre connections found in the world of data analysis.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the demand for phlebotomists in Tennessee has been steadily increasing over the past decade, with projections indicating a sustained need for skilled blood-drawers in the region. Conversely, "Doe and Jones" suggest that the proliferation of nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos has reached an all-time high, captivating audiences with their blend of mathematical wit and comedic timing. These two seemingly unrelated trends piqued our curiosity and led us to investigate whether there could be a connection between them, or if our analytical lenses were simply fogged by the exhalations of laughter-
Bolstering our research, "The Art and Science of Phlebotomy" by "Smith" provides an in-depth analysis of the phlebotomy profession, detailing the intricate procedures and skills required to excel in the field. On the other hand, "Math Jokes 4 Mathy Folks" by "Gilliland" offers a humorous glimpse into the world of mathematical humor, setting the tone for our light-hearted exploration of the subject.
Expanding our search beyond non-fiction, we delved into the realms of fiction books that might conceivably bear a tangential relationship to our study. "Blood Meridian" by Cormac McCarthy certainly shares a thematic link with our investigation, albeit in a decidedly more macabre fashion. Similarly, the whimsical title "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" by Mark Haddon offers a nod to the investigative nature of our inquiry, albeit in a canine context rather than the vein-seeking pursuits of phlebotomists.
As diligent researchers, we left no stone unturned in our quest for insight, even resorting to unconventional sources of potential relevance. Let it be known that an exhaustive review of CVS receipts and fortune cookies was also undertaken, although the results of these endeavors remain dubious at best.
In the spirit of genuine inquiry and a touch of whimsical merriment, we now embark on our quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube video titles and the demand for phlebotomists in Tennessee. Fasten your seatbelts, for we are about to venture into a world where statistical analyses rub elbows with pun-laden titles, and where bloodletting meets comedic arithmetic.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a surprising and, dare I say, blood-curdling correlation between the nerdy Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the number of phlebotomists in Tennessee. Over the ten-year period from 2012 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.8782664, implying a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. For those less familiar with statistics, a correlation of 1 would indicate a perfect positive relationship, while a correlation of -1 would denote a perfect negative relationship. In this case, we're as close to perfect as you can get without a pocket protector.
Our r-squared value of 0.7713519 tells us that a whopping 77.1% of the variation in the number of phlebotomists can be explained by the variation in the nerdy video titles. This finding is quite remarkable, considering we started this research with the sneaking suspicion that our data had "got to be kidding me!"
What's even more astounding is that our p-value came in at less than 0.01, indicating that the relationship between the video titles and the number of phlebotomists is statistically significant. In the world of statistics, a p-value less than 0.01 is like finding a unicorn in the data – it's rare, eye-opening, and might make you wonder if you've had too much caffeine.
To visually drive home our findings, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that showcases the undeniable correlation between nerdy Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the number of phlebotomists in Tennessee. Although we aren't suggesting that mathematicians are secretly moonlighting as vampire hunters, the evidence in favor of a substantial connection between these variables is as clear as a full moon on a cloudless night.
In summary, our results provide compelling evidence that the whimsical, pun-filled titles of nerdy math videos can influence the demand for phlebotomists. As researchers, we can confidently say that we've "drawn blood" from this mysterious relationship and emerged with some truly enlightening – and amusing – findings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation into the correlation between nerdy Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the number of phlebotomists in Tennessee has culminated in both delightfully amusing and scientifically intriguing results. The resounding correlation coefficient of 0.8782664 not only supports our initial suspicions but also prompts a whimsical pondering of the interconnectedness of mathematical humor and the noble art of vein navigation.

Now, let's not jump the gun, but isn't it fascinating how a cleverly crafted pun or a well-timed math joke could inadvertently nudge an audience member towards a career in bloodletting? It seems our statistical analysis has stumbled upon a rather unexpected yet compelling relationship, akin to finding a hidden treasure chest beneath the surface of a mathematically enigmatic sea.

Our findings echo the sentiments of Smith et al., who highlighted the escalating need for phlebotomists in Tennessee. The sustained increase in demand, coupled with our robust correlation with nerdy video titles, emphasizes the substantial impact of mathematics-themed humor on the career trajectories of Tennessean blood-drawers. This intertwining of analytical insights and quirky wordplay only serves to remind us that in the rich tapestry of research, even the most seemingly disparate threads may converge in unexpectedly delightful ways.

Our statistically significant p-value merits a toast, for it is akin to uncovering a mathematical easter egg hidden within the labyrinth of data analysis – a rare and delightful surprise that underscores the predictive power of nerdy humor in the realm of phlebotomy.

With our lighthearted exploration, we've ventured into uncharted research territories, bridging the gap between the seemingly unrelated worlds of number theory and venipuncture. In doing so, we've reinforced the captivating nature of statistical inquiry, where the pursuit of knowledge mingles effortlessly with the pursuit of clever wordplay, much like a well-timed double entendre in a mathematically astute comedy routine.

In conclusion, our study offers fresh insight into the influence of nerdy Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles on the demand for phlebotomists, proving that behind every witticism lies a potential career trajectory. As we unfold this puzzling yet undeniably entertaining correlation, we invite fellow researchers to gaze through their own statistical looking glass and ponder the whimsical connections that await in the realm of peculiarly linked variables.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and The number of phlebotomists in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Draw Blood and Derive Laughs: The Correlation Between Nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Phlebotomists in Tennessee"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the intriguing relationship between nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube video titles and the number of phlebotomists in the great state of Tennessee. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we set out to answer the age-old question: do the mathematical musings of Matt Parker and his fellow nerdy YouTubers have any impact on the demand for phlebotomists? To our surprise and amusement, we found a remarkably strong correlation (r = 0.8782664) and statistically significant results (p < 0.01) from 2012 to 2022. Our findings suggest that the quirky, derivative humor inherent in these video titles may indeed be influencing the career choices of Tennessean blood-drawers. This study not only sheds light on an unexplored area of research but also serves as a whimsical reminder that correlations, though statistically sound, can sometimes leave us scratching our heads and laughing heartily at the bizarre connections found in the world of data analysis.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of mathematics, comedy, and blood may seem like a Venn diagram with little overlap, but our research aims to prove that there's more correlation than expected. In this study, we delve into the peculiar realm of nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube video titles and their potential influence on the number of phlebotomists in Tennessee. The seemingly disparate worlds of mathematical musings and venipuncture converge in an unexpected dance of data analysis, with results that are as surprising as they are entertaining.
As Albert Einstein famously remarked, "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Similarly, the only reason for this study is to explore the quirky and somewhat whimsical connection between two seemingly unrelated variables. We sought to discern whether the clever, pun-laden titles of nerdy math-related YouTube videos have any discernible impact on the demand for phlebotomists in the Volunteer State. This inquiry may seem far-fetched to some, but as researchers, it is our duty to explore the uncharted territories of statistical whimsy.
Our endeavor was not only driven by scientific curiosity but also a quest for a good laugh. After all, who said statistical analysis couldn't be infused with a healthy dose of levity? It is in this spirit of academic mirth that we embarked upon our investigation, armed with regression analyses, p-values, and an array of math-related puns.
The stage is set, the audience is seated, and the data is awaiting its moment in the spotlight. Join us as we unravel the mysteries behind the relationship between nerdy mathematical humor and the noble art of bloodletting. As we venture forth into uncharted statistical territory, we are reminded of the sage words of the comedic mathematician, Matt Parker, who said, "Mathematics may not teach us to add love or subtract hate, but it gives us hope that every problem has a solution." In the case of our research, the problem at hand is determining the degree to which Stand-Up Maths titles impact phlebotomist numbers, and we hope to do so with a hearty dose of humor and scientific rigor.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a surprising and, dare I say, blood-curdling correlation between the nerdy Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the number of phlebotomists in Tennessee. Over the ten-year period from 2012 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.8782664, implying a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. For those less familiar with statistics, a correlation of 1 would indicate a perfect positive relationship, while a correlation of -1 would denote a perfect negative relationship. In this case, we're as close to perfect as you can get without a pocket protector.
Our r-squared value of 0.7713519 tells us that a whopping 77.1% of the variation in the number of phlebotomists can be explained by the variation in the nerdy video titles. This finding is quite remarkable, considering we started this research with the sneaking suspicion that our data had "got to be kidding me!"
What's even more astounding is that our p-value came in at less than 0.01, indicating that the relationship between the video titles and the number of phlebotomists is statistically significant. In the world of statistics, a p-value less than 0.01 is like finding a unicorn in the data – it's rare, eye-opening, and might make you wonder if you've had too much caffeine.
To visually drive home our findings, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that showcases the undeniable correlation between nerdy Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the number of phlebotomists in Tennessee. Although we aren't suggesting that mathematicians are secretly moonlighting as vampire hunters, the evidence in favor of a substantial connection between these variables is as clear as a full moon on a cloudless night.
In summary, our results provide compelling evidence that the whimsical, pun-filled titles of nerdy math videos can influence the demand for phlebotomists. As researchers, we can confidently say that we've "drawn blood" from this mysterious relationship and emerged with some truly enlightening – and amusing – findings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our research has not only drawn a connection between nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube video titles and the number of phlebotomists in Tennessee, but it has also added a dash of statistical hilarity to the academic world. Our correlation coefficient of 0.8782664 is as tight as a tourniquet, showing a strong positive relationship between nerdy math jokes and the courageous souls who wield the syringe.

With an r-squared value of 0.7713519, we've illuminated the underlying humor that bolsters this connection, proving that statistics and puns can coexist like a well-mixed solution. Our p-value of less than 0.01 is rarer than a lab-coat-wearing unicorn at a statistical conference, underscoring the significance of this unexpected relationship.

Through this whimsical journey, we've learned that even in the world of serious research, there's always room for math-based wit and puns. As we close the book on this peculiar investigation, we can't help but feel a pang of disappointment that our quest for mathematical mirth and phlebotomist numbers has come to an end.

But fear not, fellow researchers, for no more blood, sweat, or tears are needed in this area of study. We've completed our mission to uncover the comical link between numbers and nerdy humor, leaving the stage set for future scholars to explore their own offbeat connections in the world of data analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Draw Blood and Derive Laughs: The Correlation Between Nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Phlebotomists in Tennessee. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Comedic Research and Niche Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Draw Blood and Derive Laughs: The Correlation Between Nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Phlebotomists in Tennessee. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Consortium for Comedy and Calculus Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Draw Blood and Derive Laughs: The Correlation Between Nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Phlebotomists in Tennessee with an abstract of In this paper, we explore the intriguing relationship between nerdy Stand-Up Maths YouTube video titles and the number of phlebotomists in the great state of Tennessee. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we set out to answer the age-old question: do the mathematical musings of Matt Parker and his fellow nerdy YouTubers have any impact on the demand for phlebotomists? To our surprise and amusement, we found a remarkably strong correlation (r = 0.8782664) and statistically significant results (p < 0.01) from 2012 to 2022. Our findings suggest that the quirky, derivative humor inherent in these video titles may indeed be influencing the career choices of Tennessean blood-drawers. This study not only sheds light on an unexplored area of research but also serves as a whimsical reminder that correlations, though statistically sound, can sometimes leave us scratching our heads and laughing heartily at the bizarre connections found in the world of data analysis.

ChatGPT:

Nerdy, Stand-Up Maths, YouTube, video titles, phlebotomists, Tennessee, correlation, Bureau of Labor Statistics, AI analysis, Matt Parker, humor, demand, blood-drawers, quirky, statistically significant, data analysis, career choices, statistical correlation, correlation study, mathematical musings

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How nerdy Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How nerdy Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How nerdy Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are

The number of phlebotomists in Tennessee
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of phlebotomists in Tennessee
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of phlebotomists in Tennessee

Correlation r = 0.8782664 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7713519 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 77.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of phlebotomists in Tennessee) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How nerdy Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00038. 0.0003752260426318528000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.88 in 0.038% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,665 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.59, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
How nerdy Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are (Nerdiness score)6.66676.66676.56.356.61226.16676.33336.27596.22866.846.7895
The number of phlebotomists in Tennessee (Phlebotomists)28002850258026702510234022402290233030503280




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([6.6667,6.6667,6.5,6.35,6.6122,6.1667,6.3333,6.2759,6.2286,6.84,6.7895,])
array_2 = np.array([2800,2850,2580,2670,2510,2340,2240,2290,2330,3050,3280,])
array_1_name = "How nerdy Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "The number of phlebotomists in Tennessee"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 4517 · Black Variable ID: 25800 · Red Variable ID: 19508
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0