about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,437 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Libertarian Senators in California and the second variable is Number of moderate earthquakes worldwide.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2010, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The decrease in Libertarian votes for Senators in California led to a decrease in seismic political activity. This in turn created a more moderate political climate, reducing the frequency of political earthquakes. As a result, there was a ripple effect on the Earth's crust, leading to a decrease in the number of moderate earthquakes worldwide. It seems that even tectonic plates prefer a more moderate approach to governance!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie. Show a cozy voting booth set in California, with vibrant autumn colors surrounding it. Inside the booth, there is a visual representation of decreasing Libertarian votes for Senators, depicted by falling leaves shaped like ballots. The atmosphere around the booth exudes a sense of calm and serenity, with friendly animals such as squirrels and birds observing the democratic process peacefully. Meanwhile, on a world map in the background, illustrate a decrease in the frequency of moderate earthquakes. The tectonic plates should appear settled and stable, with gentle movements suggesting a harmonious balance. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Libertarian votes for Senators in California and Number of moderate earthquakes worldwide. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Low poly Cutsy art illustration An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Psychedelic Voxel art
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Libertarian votes for Senators in California and Number of moderate earthquakes worldwide, in the following situation: The decrease in Libertarian votes for Senators in California led to a decrease in seismic political activity. This in turn created a more moderate political climate, reducing the frequency of political earthquakes. As a result, there was a ripple effect on the Earth's crust, leading to a decrease in the number of moderate earthquakes worldwide. It seems that even tectonic plates prefer a more moderate approach to governance!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In California, a voting booth showing decreasing Libertarian votes for Senators, is surrounded by calm and serene political atmosphere. Meanwhile, around the world, a map displays a decrease in the frequency of moderate earthquakes, with tectonic plates appearing more settled and stable.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In California, a voting booth showing decreasing Libertarian votes for Senators, is surrounded by calm and serene political atmosphere. Meanwhile, around the world, a map displays a decrease in the frequency of moderate earthquakes, with tectonic plates appearing more settled and stable. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie. Show a cozy voting booth set in California, with vibrant autumn colors surrounding it. Inside the booth, there is a visual representation of decreasing Libertarian votes for Senators, depicted by falling leaves shaped like ballots. The atmosphere around the booth exudes a sense of calm and serenity, with friendly animals such as squirrels and birds observing the democratic process peacefully. Meanwhile, on a world map in the background, illustrate a decrease in the frequency of moderate earthquakes. The tectonic plates should appear settled and stable, with gentle movements suggesting a harmonious balance.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Libertarian votes for Senators in California caused Number of moderate earthquakes worldwide to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Rocking the Vote: How Libertarian Senators in California are Shaking Up Earthquake Activity Worldwide

The Journal of Geopolitical Seismic Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and Number of moderate earthquakes worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US Geological Survey to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8089358 and p < 0.05 for 1990 to 2010.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Rocking the Vote: How Libertarian Senators in California are Shaking Up Earthquake Activity Worldwide

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this seismic study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and the occurrence of moderate earthquakes worldwide. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Geological Survey, we probe the correlation between the number of ballots cast for Libertarian candidates and the frequency of seismic events. Our findings reveal a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8089358 and p < 0.05 from 1990 to 2010, indicating that libertarian-leaning voting behavior may indeed be linked to geological activity. These results raise intriguing questions about the potential impact of political ideologies on tectonic shifts and leave us pondering the seismic implications of future elections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and Number of moderate earthquakes worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Rocking the Vote: How Libertarian Senators in California are Shaking Up Earthquake Activity Worldwide

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this seismic study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and the occurrence of moderate earthquakes worldwide. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Geological Survey, we probe the correlation between the number of ballots cast for Libertarian candidates and the frequency of seismic events. Our findings reveal a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8089358 and p < 0.05 from 1990 to 2010, indicating that libertarian-leaning voting behavior may indeed be linked to geological activity. These results raise intriguing questions about the potential impact of political ideologies on tectonic shifts and leave us pondering the seismic implications of future elections.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

When it comes to seismic activity, we often think of tectonic plates, fault lines, and perhaps the occasional Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson disaster movie. However, in this study, we delve into uncharted territory as we explore the curious relationship between political voting behavior and the shaking and quaking of our Earth.

It is widely acknowledged that earthquakes are caused by the movement and release of energy within the Earth's crust, but could there be a political undercurrent to these geological events? This paper aims to unravel the unexpected connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and the number of moderate earthquakes occurring worldwide.

In the world of statistics, we typically deal with variables like income, education, and demographics. But in this research, we are dancing on the fault lines of political ideology and seismic activity. It's a bit like trying to measure the Richter Scale with a yardstick – unconventional and sure to raise some eyebrows in the academic sphere.

We are not simply content with crunching numbers and conducting routine analyses. Oh no, we seek to unearth a seismic revelation that might just rattle the foundations of conventional wisdom. With data sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Geological Survey, we embark on a journey that could potentially rock the very core of our understanding of the interplay between politics and geology.

So, grab your geological hammers and political pickaxes as we start digging into the bedrock of this peculiar correlation. In the words of the legendary Bob Dylan, "The times they are a-changin'" – and who knows, they might just be causing the Earth to tremble too.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and Number of moderate earthquakes worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Rocking the Vote: How Libertarian Senators in California are Shaking Up Earthquake Activity Worldwide

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this seismic study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and the occurrence of moderate earthquakes worldwide. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Geological Survey, we probe the correlation between the number of ballots cast for Libertarian candidates and the frequency of seismic events. Our findings reveal a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8089358 and p < 0.05 from 1990 to 2010, indicating that libertarian-leaning voting behavior may indeed be linked to geological activity. These results raise intriguing questions about the potential impact of political ideologies on tectonic shifts and leave us pondering the seismic implications of future elections.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
When it comes to seismic activity, we often think of tectonic plates, fault lines, and perhaps the occasional Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson disaster movie. However, in this study, we delve into uncharted territory as we explore the curious relationship between political voting behavior and the shaking and quaking of our Earth.
It is widely acknowledged that earthquakes are caused by the movement and release of energy within the Earth's crust, but could there be a political undercurrent to these geological events? This paper aims to unravel the unexpected connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and the number of moderate earthquakes occurring worldwide.
In the world of statistics, we typically deal with variables like income, education, and demographics. But in this research, we are dancing on the fault lines of political ideology and seismic activity. It's a bit like trying to measure the Richter Scale with a yardstick – unconventional and sure to raise some eyebrows in the academic sphere.
We are not simply content with crunching numbers and conducting routine analyses. Oh no, we seek to unearth a seismic revelation that might just rattle the foundations of conventional wisdom. With data sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Geological Survey, we embark on a journey that could potentially rock the very core of our understanding of the interplay between politics and geology.
So, grab your geological hammers and political pickaxes as we start digging into the bedrock of this peculiar correlation. In the words of the legendary Bob Dylan, "The times they are a-changin'" – and who knows, they might just be causing the Earth to tremble too.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith et al. (2015) discovered a shocking correlation between the rise of Libertarian voting in California and a surge in moderate earthquakes worldwide. In their groundbreaking study, the researchers unearthed a correlation coefficient so high, it threatened to send seismic waves through the academic community. However, as much as we want to believe that politicians can indeed shake up the world, let's take a moment to delve into some more lighthearted sources that may provide insight into this unlikely connection.

In "The Libertarian Mind" by David Boaz, the author delves into the principles of libertarianism, advocating for personal freedom and limited government intervention. While Boaz may not have foreseen the seismic implications of this political mindset, his work sets the stage for contemplating the potential seismic repercussions of libertarian-leaning policies.

On the other end of the spectrum, we must consider the fictitious but thought-provoking "Atlas Shrugged" by Ayn Rand. This classic novel embodies individualism and free-market capitalism, themes which resonate with the libertarian ideology. While it doesn't explicitly explore earthquake diplomacy or tectonic treaties, it certainly provides a metaphorical rumble in the political landscape.

Speaking of rumblings, social media certainly hasn't been silent on the matter. A tweet by @QuakeWatcher2010 boldly proclaims, "The ground may shake, but my vote won't. #LibertarianPower" – a seemingly innocuous statement that, when considered in the context of our research, may hold seismic significance.

Now that we've thrown caution to the wind and explored the lighter side of potential connections, let's get into the nitty-gritty of these seismic findings. But first, a brief shake-up of conventional academic norms and a dash of humor never hurt anyone – except, perhaps, the Richter Scale.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and Number of moderate earthquakes worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US Geological Survey . You used data from 1990 to 2010

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Rocking the Vote: How Libertarian Senators in California are Shaking Up Earthquake Activity Worldwide

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this seismic study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and the occurrence of moderate earthquakes worldwide. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Geological Survey, we probe the correlation between the number of ballots cast for Libertarian candidates and the frequency of seismic events. Our findings reveal a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8089358 and p < 0.05 from 1990 to 2010, indicating that libertarian-leaning voting behavior may indeed be linked to geological activity. These results raise intriguing questions about the potential impact of political ideologies on tectonic shifts and leave us pondering the seismic implications of future elections.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
When it comes to seismic activity, we often think of tectonic plates, fault lines, and perhaps the occasional Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson disaster movie. However, in this study, we delve into uncharted territory as we explore the curious relationship between political voting behavior and the shaking and quaking of our Earth.
It is widely acknowledged that earthquakes are caused by the movement and release of energy within the Earth's crust, but could there be a political undercurrent to these geological events? This paper aims to unravel the unexpected connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and the number of moderate earthquakes occurring worldwide.
In the world of statistics, we typically deal with variables like income, education, and demographics. But in this research, we are dancing on the fault lines of political ideology and seismic activity. It's a bit like trying to measure the Richter Scale with a yardstick – unconventional and sure to raise some eyebrows in the academic sphere.
We are not simply content with crunching numbers and conducting routine analyses. Oh no, we seek to unearth a seismic revelation that might just rattle the foundations of conventional wisdom. With data sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Geological Survey, we embark on a journey that could potentially rock the very core of our understanding of the interplay between politics and geology.
So, grab your geological hammers and political pickaxes as we start digging into the bedrock of this peculiar correlation. In the words of the legendary Bob Dylan, "The times they are a-changin'" – and who knows, they might just be causing the Earth to tremble too.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the seismic mystery lurking beneath the political landscape of California, we undertook a methodological approach that could be best described as a whirlwind adventure through statistical analysis and geological chaos. Our data extraction and analysis processes were akin to a treasure hunt, with the bounty being the uncovering of a correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and the occurrence of moderate earthquakes worldwide.

First, we delved into the treasure troves of the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Geological Survey, where we extracted the voting data for Libertarian candidates in California and the records of moderate seismic activities from 1990 to 2010. This involved sifting through mountains of data, much like a geological expedition in search of rare minerals, except our precious find was statistical nuggets rather than glittering gems.

Once we had our hands on these glittering nuggets of data, we embarked on a statistical voyage, navigating through the choppy waters of correlation analysis and regression modeling. We calculated the number of ballots cast for Libertarian candidates and the frequency of moderate earthquakes worldwide, constructing scatterplots and conducting correlation tests with a sense of adventure rivaling that of Indiana Jones seeking the Lost Ark.

The correlation analysis was akin to looking for patterns in the cosmic dance of political ideologies and geological events. We employed Pearson's correlation coefficient to measure the strength and direction of the relationship between libertarian-leaning voting behavior and seismic occurrences, with a flair for drama that matched the intensity of an earthquake rumbling through the earth.

Moreover, we utilized regression modeling to delve deeper into the seismic tremors of political significance. This involved fitting mathematical equations to our data, much like trying to create a geological recipe for seismic activity seasoned with a hint of political spice, to explore the predictive relationship between Libertarian votes in California and moderate earthquakes worldwide.

Our statistical journey did not stop there. In the spirit of scientific exploration, we also performed a series of robustness checks to ensure the stability of our findings, embracing uncertainty with the same gusto as a geologist navigating through unpredictable terrains.

In summary, our methodology was a vibrant fusion of statistical prowess and geological curiosity, akin to a rollercoaster ride that left us exhilarated and slightly dizzy – but ultimately rewarded us with a surprisingly robust relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and the number of moderate earthquakes occurring worldwide.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and Number of moderate earthquakes worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US Geological Survey .

For the time period 1990 to 2010, you found a correlation 0.8089358, r-squared of 0.6543772, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Rocking the Vote: How Libertarian Senators in California are Shaking Up Earthquake Activity Worldwide

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this seismic study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and the occurrence of moderate earthquakes worldwide. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Geological Survey, we probe the correlation between the number of ballots cast for Libertarian candidates and the frequency of seismic events. Our findings reveal a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8089358 and p < 0.05 from 1990 to 2010, indicating that libertarian-leaning voting behavior may indeed be linked to geological activity. These results raise intriguing questions about the potential impact of political ideologies on tectonic shifts and leave us pondering the seismic implications of future elections.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
When it comes to seismic activity, we often think of tectonic plates, fault lines, and perhaps the occasional Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson disaster movie. However, in this study, we delve into uncharted territory as we explore the curious relationship between political voting behavior and the shaking and quaking of our Earth.
It is widely acknowledged that earthquakes are caused by the movement and release of energy within the Earth's crust, but could there be a political undercurrent to these geological events? This paper aims to unravel the unexpected connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and the number of moderate earthquakes occurring worldwide.
In the world of statistics, we typically deal with variables like income, education, and demographics. But in this research, we are dancing on the fault lines of political ideology and seismic activity. It's a bit like trying to measure the Richter Scale with a yardstick – unconventional and sure to raise some eyebrows in the academic sphere.
We are not simply content with crunching numbers and conducting routine analyses. Oh no, we seek to unearth a seismic revelation that might just rattle the foundations of conventional wisdom. With data sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Geological Survey, we embark on a journey that could potentially rock the very core of our understanding of the interplay between politics and geology.
So, grab your geological hammers and political pickaxes as we start digging into the bedrock of this peculiar correlation. In the words of the legendary Bob Dylan, "The times they are a-changin'" – and who knows, they might just be causing the Earth to tremble too.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of this study unearthed a seismic revelation that may just rock the world of political science and geology alike. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.8089358, with an r-squared of 0.6543772 and a p-value less than 0.05, indicating a statistically significant relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and the frequency of moderate earthquakes worldwide from 1990 to 2010.

Our statistical analysis suggests that there is indeed a seismic correlation between political leanings and tectonic activities. This correlation is so strong that it could make even the most stoic seismologist tremble with excitement, and it certainly stands as a Richter scale-worthy finding in the realm of political geology.

In Figure 1, our scatterplot graphically depicts the robust connection between the number of votes cast for Libertarian candidates in California and the occurrence of moderate earthquakes globally. The plot showcases the undeniable trend, resembling nothing less than a seismic dance between political votes and geological events. It's like watching a political landslide morph into a geological fault line – what an earth-shattering sight!

These findings open up a whole new fault line of inquiry, prompting us to consider the seismic implications of political ideologies on an international scale. It seems that the impact of political leanings stretches beyond legislation to the very earth beneath our feet. It's a discovery that might just make the most ardent politico exclaim, "Now that's what I call shaking up the political landscape!"

In the words of the wise, "May the ground we walk on be as solid as our statistical conclusions." And may our understanding of the world around us continue to evolve with the seismic quirkiness that this research has unearthed.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and Number of moderate earthquakes worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Rocking the Vote: How Libertarian Senators in California are Shaking Up Earthquake Activity Worldwide

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this seismic study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and the occurrence of moderate earthquakes worldwide. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Geological Survey, we probe the correlation between the number of ballots cast for Libertarian candidates and the frequency of seismic events. Our findings reveal a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8089358 and p < 0.05 from 1990 to 2010, indicating that libertarian-leaning voting behavior may indeed be linked to geological activity. These results raise intriguing questions about the potential impact of political ideologies on tectonic shifts and leave us pondering the seismic implications of future elections.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2015) discovered a shocking correlation between the rise of Libertarian voting in California and a surge in moderate earthquakes worldwide. In their groundbreaking study, the researchers unearthed a correlation coefficient so high, it threatened to send seismic waves through the academic community. However, as much as we want to believe that politicians can indeed shake up the world, let's take a moment to delve into some more lighthearted sources that may provide insight into this unlikely connection.
In "The Libertarian Mind" by David Boaz, the author delves into the principles of libertarianism, advocating for personal freedom and limited government intervention. While Boaz may not have foreseen the seismic implications of this political mindset, his work sets the stage for contemplating the potential seismic repercussions of libertarian-leaning policies.
On the other end of the spectrum, we must consider the fictitious but thought-provoking "Atlas Shrugged" by Ayn Rand. This classic novel embodies individualism and free-market capitalism, themes which resonate with the libertarian ideology. While it doesn't explicitly explore earthquake diplomacy or tectonic treaties, it certainly provides a metaphorical rumble in the political landscape.
Speaking of rumblings, social media certainly hasn't been silent on the matter. A tweet by @QuakeWatcher2010 boldly proclaims, "The ground may shake, but my vote won't. #LibertarianPower" – a seemingly innocuous statement that, when considered in the context of our research, may hold seismic significance.
Now that we've thrown caution to the wind and explored the lighter side of potential connections, let's get into the nitty-gritty of these seismic findings. But first, a brief shake-up of conventional academic norms and a dash of humor never hurt anyone – except, perhaps, the Richter Scale.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of this study unearthed a seismic revelation that may just rock the world of political science and geology alike. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.8089358, with an r-squared of 0.6543772 and a p-value less than 0.05, indicating a statistically significant relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and the frequency of moderate earthquakes worldwide from 1990 to 2010.
Our statistical analysis suggests that there is indeed a seismic correlation between political leanings and tectonic activities. This correlation is so strong that it could make even the most stoic seismologist tremble with excitement, and it certainly stands as a Richter scale-worthy finding in the realm of political geology.
In Figure 1, our scatterplot graphically depicts the robust connection between the number of votes cast for Libertarian candidates in California and the occurrence of moderate earthquakes globally. The plot showcases the undeniable trend, resembling nothing less than a seismic dance between political votes and geological events. It's like watching a political landslide morph into a geological fault line – what an earth-shattering sight!
These findings open up a whole new fault line of inquiry, prompting us to consider the seismic implications of political ideologies on an international scale. It seems that the impact of political leanings stretches beyond legislation to the very earth beneath our feet. It's a discovery that might just make the most ardent politico exclaim, "Now that's what I call shaking up the political landscape!"
In the words of the wise, "May the ground we walk on be as solid as our statistical conclusions." And may our understanding of the world around us continue to evolve with the seismic quirkiness that this research has unearthed.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The juxtaposition of political leanings and tectonic activities has left us on shaky ground, figuratively speaking, but our seismic findings have indeed shaken things up in the realm of interdisciplinary research. Our study provides striking support for Smith et al.'s (2015) groundbreaking discovery of a correlation between Libertarian voting in California and moderate earthquakes worldwide. As much as we might have initially dismissed this connection as far-fetched, our statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8089358 has forced us to acknowledge that these seismic implications may not be all rumble and humbug after all.

Delving into the lighthearted sources in our literature review, we can't help but marvel at how an innocuous tweet or a fictional novel may have inadvertently laid the groundwork for contemplating the seemingly improbable link between political ideology and geological activity. Who would have thought that a metaphorical political landslide could morph into a tangible geological fault line? It's enough to make even the most stoic seismologist quake with excitement, and our statistical analysis suggests that this seismic correlation is not to be taken lightly.

Our scatterplot, resembling a seismic dance between political votes and geological events, visually encapsulates the undeniable trend we uncovered. It's like watching a political landslide evolve into a geological fault line – an earth-shattering sight indeed! These seismic implications prompt us to consider how political ideologies on an international scale might impact not just legislation but the very earth beneath our feet. It's a discovery that might just make the most ardent politico exclaim, "Now that's what I call shaking up the political landscape!"

In conclusion, our findings have set a Richter scale-worthy precedent in the confluence of political science and geology, shaking up conventional academic norms and paving the way for a seismic shift in our understanding of the world around us. We stand on the cusp of a whole new fault line of inquiry, leaving us with a deep-seated rumble of excitement for the seismic potentialities that future research in this area may uncover. Like the tectonic plates beneath our feet, our beliefs about the separation of political and geological realms may be experiencing a paradigm shift. Oh, the Earth-shattering revelations of statistical inquiry!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and Number of moderate earthquakes worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Rocking the Vote: How Libertarian Senators in California are Shaking Up Earthquake Activity Worldwide

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this seismic study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and the occurrence of moderate earthquakes worldwide. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Geological Survey, we probe the correlation between the number of ballots cast for Libertarian candidates and the frequency of seismic events. Our findings reveal a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8089358 and p < 0.05 from 1990 to 2010, indicating that libertarian-leaning voting behavior may indeed be linked to geological activity. These results raise intriguing questions about the potential impact of political ideologies on tectonic shifts and leave us pondering the seismic implications of future elections.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
When it comes to seismic activity, we often think of tectonic plates, fault lines, and perhaps the occasional Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson disaster movie. However, in this study, we delve into uncharted territory as we explore the curious relationship between political voting behavior and the shaking and quaking of our Earth.
It is widely acknowledged that earthquakes are caused by the movement and release of energy within the Earth's crust, but could there be a political undercurrent to these geological events? This paper aims to unravel the unexpected connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and the number of moderate earthquakes occurring worldwide.
In the world of statistics, we typically deal with variables like income, education, and demographics. But in this research, we are dancing on the fault lines of political ideology and seismic activity. It's a bit like trying to measure the Richter Scale with a yardstick – unconventional and sure to raise some eyebrows in the academic sphere.
We are not simply content with crunching numbers and conducting routine analyses. Oh no, we seek to unearth a seismic revelation that might just rattle the foundations of conventional wisdom. With data sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Geological Survey, we embark on a journey that could potentially rock the very core of our understanding of the interplay between politics and geology.
So, grab your geological hammers and political pickaxes as we start digging into the bedrock of this peculiar correlation. In the words of the legendary Bob Dylan, "The times they are a-changin'" – and who knows, they might just be causing the Earth to tremble too.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of this study unearthed a seismic revelation that may just rock the world of political science and geology alike. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.8089358, with an r-squared of 0.6543772 and a p-value less than 0.05, indicating a statistically significant relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and the frequency of moderate earthquakes worldwide from 1990 to 2010.
Our statistical analysis suggests that there is indeed a seismic correlation between political leanings and tectonic activities. This correlation is so strong that it could make even the most stoic seismologist tremble with excitement, and it certainly stands as a Richter scale-worthy finding in the realm of political geology.
In Figure 1, our scatterplot graphically depicts the robust connection between the number of votes cast for Libertarian candidates in California and the occurrence of moderate earthquakes globally. The plot showcases the undeniable trend, resembling nothing less than a seismic dance between political votes and geological events. It's like watching a political landslide morph into a geological fault line – what an earth-shattering sight!
These findings open up a whole new fault line of inquiry, prompting us to consider the seismic implications of political ideologies on an international scale. It seems that the impact of political leanings stretches beyond legislation to the very earth beneath our feet. It's a discovery that might just make the most ardent politico exclaim, "Now that's what I call shaking up the political landscape!"
In the words of the wise, "May the ground we walk on be as solid as our statistical conclusions." And may our understanding of the world around us continue to evolve with the seismic quirkiness that this research has unearthed.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our seismic study has not only shaken up the world of statistical analysis and political science but has also unearthed a correlation that would make even the most stoic seismologist excited. The robust connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and the occurrence of moderate earthquakes worldwide from 1990 to 2010 has left us pondering the seismic implications of future political tremors.

The findings of our research have not only added a new layer to the tectonic plates of statistical analysis but have also ignited a political firestorm in the realm of geology. This seismic correlation is so strong that it could make even the most stable of politicians wobble.

It seems that political leanings may influence not only legislations but also the very ground beneath our feet. As we traverse the treacherous terrain of political geography, it is essential to remember that sometimes, the Earth moves in mysterious ways.

With such groundbreaking results, we are compelled to assert that further research in this area is unnecessary. The data has spoken, and it's time for us to rock on to new frontiers of scientific exploration. After all, when it comes to shaking up the scientific community, sometimes it's best to leave well enough alone.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Rocking the Vote: How Libertarian Senators in California are Shaking Up Earthquake Activity Worldwide. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Geopolitical Seismic Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Rocking the Vote: How Libertarian Senators in California are Shaking Up Earthquake Activity Worldwide. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Seismic Political Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Rocking the Vote: How Libertarian Senators in California are Shaking Up Earthquake Activity Worldwide with an abstract of In this seismic study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in California and the occurrence of moderate earthquakes worldwide. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Geological Survey, we probe the correlation between the number of ballots cast for Libertarian candidates and the frequency of seismic events. Our findings reveal a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8089358 and p < 0.05 from 1990 to 2010, indicating that libertarian-leaning voting behavior may indeed be linked to geological activity. These results raise intriguing questions about the potential impact of political ideologies on tectonic shifts and leave us pondering the seismic implications of future elections.

ChatGPT:

Libertarian Senators California earthquake activity, Libertarian votes seismic events worldwide, political ideology tectonic shifts, seismic study, earthquake frequency and Libertarian voting behavior, correlation between voting behavior and earthquakes, geological activity and political ideologies

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Libertarian Senators in California
Detailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Libertarian Senate candidates in California
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Libertarian Senators in California

Number of moderate earthquakes worldwide
Source: US Geological Survey
See what else correlates with Number of moderate earthquakes worldwide

Correlation r = 0.8089358 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6543772 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 65.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of moderate earthquakes worldwide) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Libertarian Senators in California) over the 7 years from 1990 through 2010.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.028. 0.0275700378892373040000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.81 in 2.8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 36 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.14, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1992199419982000200420062010
Votes for Libertarian Senators in California (Total votes)48371817910093926187718216522133851175242
Number of moderate earthquakes worldwide (Earthquakes)166146117146141142150




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([483718,179100,93926,187718,216522,133851,175242,])
array_2 = np.array([166,146,117,146,141,142,150,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Libertarian Senators in California"
array_2_name = "Number of moderate earthquakes worldwide"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 4437 · Black Variable ID: 26208 · Red Variable ID: 222
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0