about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,295 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains'.  The chart goes from 2014 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

People became tired of avian precipitation preferences and opted for more obscure meteorological bird behavior queries, such as 'do birds use umbrellas' and 'are there raincoats for pigeons.' This prompted a surge in fashionable bird-related content, leading to a shift in the Deep Look video landscape towards topics like 'Rainy Day Feather Fashion: A Bird's Guide to Staying Dry and Stylish.' The allure of bird runway trends ultimately reigned supreme, raining on the parade of 'where do birds go when it rains' and causing a noticeable decrease in its trendiness.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a vibrant YouTube video thumbnail showcasing a confident and stylish bird wearing a colorful raincoat. The bird is strutting among a shower of raindrops, exuding an air of elegance. In the background, create a group of people huddled around a laptop, eagerly searching for quirky queries such as "do birds use umbrellas" and "bird raincoats." Meanwhile, a once-prominent Google search for "where do birds go when it rains" should be fading into the background, symbolizing its diminishing trendiness. Ensure that the scene is visually captivating and conveys the excitement of discovery and quirky fascination with avian behavior. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic A Discovery magazine cover image Photorealism A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s a Polaroid photo
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains', in the following situation: People became tired of avian precipitation preferences and opted for more obscure meteorological bird behavior queries, such as 'do birds use umbrellas' and 'are there raincoats for pigeons.' This prompted a surge in fashionable bird-related content, leading to a shift in the Deep Look video landscape towards topics like 'Rainy Day Feather Fashion: A Bird's Guide to Staying Dry and Stylish.' The allure of bird runway trends ultimately reigned supreme, raining on the parade of 'where do birds go when it rains' and causing a noticeable decrease in its trendiness.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, we see a vibrant YouTube video thumbnail featuring a stylish bird in a colorful raincoat, strutting confidently amidst a shower of raindrops. In the background, there is a group of people huddled around a laptop, eagerly searching for quirky queries like "do birds use umbrellas" and "bird raincoats." Meanwhile, a once-prominent Google search for "where do birds go when it rains" fades into the background, symbolizing its diminishing trendiness.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, we see a vibrant YouTube video thumbnail featuring a stylish bird in a colorful raincoat, strutting confidently amidst a shower of raindrops. In the background, there is a group of people huddled around a laptop, eagerly searching for quirky queries like "do birds use umbrellas" and "bird raincoats." Meanwhile, a once-prominent Google search for "where do birds go when it rains" fades into the background, symbolizing its diminishing trendiness. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a vibrant YouTube video thumbnail showcasing a confident and stylish bird wearing a colorful raincoat. The bird is strutting among a shower of raindrops, exuding an air of elegance. In the background, create a group of people huddled around a laptop, eagerly searching for quirky queries such as "do birds use umbrellas" and "bird raincoats." Meanwhile, a once-prominent Google search for "where do birds go when it rains" should be fading into the background, symbolizing its diminishing trendiness. Ensure that the scene is visually captivating and conveys the excitement of discovery and quirky fascination with avian behavior.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are caused where do birds go when it rains (Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains') to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Flocking Together: The Featherbrained Connection Between Trendy Deep Look YouTube Video Titles and 'Where Do Birds Go When It Rains' Google Searches

The Journal of Avian Internet Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9094935 and p < 0.01 for 2014 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Flocking Together: The Featherbrained Connection Between Trendy Deep Look YouTube Video Titles and 'Where Do Birds Go When It Rains' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the saying goes, birds of a feather flock together. In this paper, we present the findings of our research on the surprising correlation between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and the frequency of Google searches for the age-old query, "where do birds go when it rains." Employing a comprehensive analysis of data derived from artificial intelligence (AI) examination of YouTube video titles and Google Trends, our research has unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9094935 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023. The implications of this unexpected correlation go beyond the feathers of scientific inquiry and delve into the uncharted territories of avian curiosity, digital media trends, and the whimsical wonders of the internet. Our findings not only offer a new lens through which to view the behavioral patterns of both birds and internet users but also serve as a striking reminder of the captivatingly unpredictable connections that can emerge in the digital realm. So, the next time you find yourself pondering the elusive whereabouts of rain-drenched birds, remember that the internet may hold the key—and perhaps the birds are not as flighty as we thought.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Flocking Together: The Featherbrained Connection Between Trendy Deep Look YouTube Video Titles and 'Where Do Birds Go When It Rains' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the saying goes, birds of a feather flock together. In this paper, we present the findings of our research on the surprising correlation between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and the frequency of Google searches for the age-old query, "where do birds go when it rains." Employing a comprehensive analysis of data derived from artificial intelligence (AI) examination of YouTube video titles and Google Trends, our research has unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9094935 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023. The implications of this unexpected correlation go beyond the feathers of scientific inquiry and delve into the uncharted territories of avian curiosity, digital media trends, and the whimsical wonders of the internet. Our findings not only offer a new lens through which to view the behavioral patterns of both birds and internet users but also serve as a striking reminder of the captivatingly unpredictable connections that can emerge in the digital realm. So, the next time you find yourself pondering the elusive whereabouts of rain-drenched birds, remember that the internet may hold the key—and perhaps the birds are not as flighty as we thought.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the age of information abundance and algorithmic serendipity, we are constantly bombarded with an endless array of digital content. Among the myriad topics that pique our collective curiosity, the behavior of avian creatures and their coping mechanisms in inclement weather may seem like a trivial pursuit. However, as researchers, we hold the unshakable belief that even the most seemingly whimsical queries can unravel profound insights.

The fascination with avian behavior during rainfall has long permeated human curiosity. Among the countless ponderings that arise during a rainy day, the question "where do birds go when it rains" has persevered as a timeless inquiry of both scientific and poetic significance. We are, after all, a species perennially piqued by the behavior of our feathered companions, often pondering their fleeting whereabouts when precipitation descends from the skies. This age-old inquiry, with its head in the clouds and its heart amidst the plumage, has now crossed paths with the modern phenomena of online video content consumption.

As we enter the world of Deep Look, a YouTube channel known for its meticulously crafted videos exploring the wonders of the natural world, a curious synergy emerges. The titles of these videos, crafted to captivate and compel clicks, find themselves entwined with humanity's evergreen fascination with avian wanderlust during rainfall. We embark on this research endeavor with an air of both scholarly rigor and digital whimsy, in pursuit of unraveling the peculiar alignment of outlandish video titles and plaintive avian queries.

As we delve into the foraging grounds of this peculiar nexus of digital content and avian intrigue, we seek not only to unmask the elusive relationship between Deep Look video titles and 'where do birds go when it rains' Google searches but also to tease out the underlying implications for both the natural world and the digital landscape. Our pursuit is not merely a flight of fancy but a valiant quest to uncover the serendipitous symphony of avian musings and online media trends. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear reader, as we embark on a journey that is equal parts analytical astuteness and digital dexterity, aiming to shed light on the featherbrained connection between human curiosity and avian wanderlust.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Flocking Together: The Featherbrained Connection Between Trendy Deep Look YouTube Video Titles and 'Where Do Birds Go When It Rains' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the saying goes, birds of a feather flock together. In this paper, we present the findings of our research on the surprising correlation between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and the frequency of Google searches for the age-old query, "where do birds go when it rains." Employing a comprehensive analysis of data derived from artificial intelligence (AI) examination of YouTube video titles and Google Trends, our research has unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9094935 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023. The implications of this unexpected correlation go beyond the feathers of scientific inquiry and delve into the uncharted territories of avian curiosity, digital media trends, and the whimsical wonders of the internet. Our findings not only offer a new lens through which to view the behavioral patterns of both birds and internet users but also serve as a striking reminder of the captivatingly unpredictable connections that can emerge in the digital realm. So, the next time you find yourself pondering the elusive whereabouts of rain-drenched birds, remember that the internet may hold the key—and perhaps the birds are not as flighty as we thought.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the age of information abundance and algorithmic serendipity, we are constantly bombarded with an endless array of digital content. Among the myriad topics that pique our collective curiosity, the behavior of avian creatures and their coping mechanisms in inclement weather may seem like a trivial pursuit. However, as researchers, we hold the unshakable belief that even the most seemingly whimsical queries can unravel profound insights.
The fascination with avian behavior during rainfall has long permeated human curiosity. Among the countless ponderings that arise during a rainy day, the question "where do birds go when it rains" has persevered as a timeless inquiry of both scientific and poetic significance. We are, after all, a species perennially piqued by the behavior of our feathered companions, often pondering their fleeting whereabouts when precipitation descends from the skies. This age-old inquiry, with its head in the clouds and its heart amidst the plumage, has now crossed paths with the modern phenomena of online video content consumption.
As we enter the world of Deep Look, a YouTube channel known for its meticulously crafted videos exploring the wonders of the natural world, a curious synergy emerges. The titles of these videos, crafted to captivate and compel clicks, find themselves entwined with humanity's evergreen fascination with avian wanderlust during rainfall. We embark on this research endeavor with an air of both scholarly rigor and digital whimsy, in pursuit of unraveling the peculiar alignment of outlandish video titles and plaintive avian queries.
As we delve into the foraging grounds of this peculiar nexus of digital content and avian intrigue, we seek not only to unmask the elusive relationship between Deep Look video titles and 'where do birds go when it rains' Google searches but also to tease out the underlying implications for both the natural world and the digital landscape. Our pursuit is not merely a flight of fancy but a valiant quest to uncover the serendipitous symphony of avian musings and online media trends. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear reader, as we embark on a journey that is equal parts analytical astuteness and digital dexterity, aiming to shed light on the featherbrained connection between human curiosity and avian wanderlust.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work titled "Feathered Friends: A Comprehensive Study of Avian Behavior in Inclement Weather," Smith and Doe conducted a thorough investigation into the age-old query "where do birds go when it rains." Their extensive field observations and meticulous data analysis yielded valuable insights into the shelter-seeking tendencies of various bird species during rainfall. Moreover, their research laid a solid foundation for subsequent inquiries delving into the whimsical wanderings of our avian counterparts.

Jones, in "The Ecology of Precipitation: A Synthesis of Avifauna Responses to Rainfall," further expanded upon the nuanced intricacies of avian behavior in response to precipitation. By examining bird habitats and behavioral patterns during rainy conditions, Jones shed light on the diverse strategies employed by birds to seek refuge from inclement weather. These studies formed the bedrock of our understanding of avian behavior in the face of rainfall, setting the stage for our investigation into the surprising correlation between Deep Look YouTube video titles and Google searches for "where do birds go when it rains."

Turning to the realm of non-fiction literature, we find "The Secret Lives of Birds" by David Attenborough and "Birds in Their Natural Habitat" by John James Audubon, both of which provide detailed accounts of avian behavior and habitat preferences. While these works offer invaluable knowledge about the intricacies of avian life, they do not directly address the intersection of digital media trends and avian curiosity.

In the realm of fiction, the classic novel "To Kill a Mockingbird" by Harper Lee and the whimsical tale "Jonathan Livingston Seagull" by Richard Bach indirectly touch upon the themes of avian behavior and aspirations. While these literary works offer profound philosophical musings on avian consciousness and societal dynamics, they do not directly inform our investigation into the correlation between Deep Look YouTube video titles and 'where do birds go when it rains' Google searches.

In the realm of visual media, cartoons such as "Tweety Bird" and children's shows like "Sesame Street" featuring feathered characters provide an anthropomorphic lens through which to observe avian behavior. While these animated and educational programs offer a delightful portrayal of avian antics, they do not rigorously explore the correlation between online video trends and avian queries.

As we navigate through this eclectic tapestry of literature and media, we approach our research inquiry with a spirit of curiosity and a pinch of digital delight, recognizing the unconventional intersections that await our exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends . You used data from 2014 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Flocking Together: The Featherbrained Connection Between Trendy Deep Look YouTube Video Titles and 'Where Do Birds Go When It Rains' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the saying goes, birds of a feather flock together. In this paper, we present the findings of our research on the surprising correlation between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and the frequency of Google searches for the age-old query, "where do birds go when it rains." Employing a comprehensive analysis of data derived from artificial intelligence (AI) examination of YouTube video titles and Google Trends, our research has unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9094935 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023. The implications of this unexpected correlation go beyond the feathers of scientific inquiry and delve into the uncharted territories of avian curiosity, digital media trends, and the whimsical wonders of the internet. Our findings not only offer a new lens through which to view the behavioral patterns of both birds and internet users but also serve as a striking reminder of the captivatingly unpredictable connections that can emerge in the digital realm. So, the next time you find yourself pondering the elusive whereabouts of rain-drenched birds, remember that the internet may hold the key—and perhaps the birds are not as flighty as we thought.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the age of information abundance and algorithmic serendipity, we are constantly bombarded with an endless array of digital content. Among the myriad topics that pique our collective curiosity, the behavior of avian creatures and their coping mechanisms in inclement weather may seem like a trivial pursuit. However, as researchers, we hold the unshakable belief that even the most seemingly whimsical queries can unravel profound insights.
The fascination with avian behavior during rainfall has long permeated human curiosity. Among the countless ponderings that arise during a rainy day, the question "where do birds go when it rains" has persevered as a timeless inquiry of both scientific and poetic significance. We are, after all, a species perennially piqued by the behavior of our feathered companions, often pondering their fleeting whereabouts when precipitation descends from the skies. This age-old inquiry, with its head in the clouds and its heart amidst the plumage, has now crossed paths with the modern phenomena of online video content consumption.
As we enter the world of Deep Look, a YouTube channel known for its meticulously crafted videos exploring the wonders of the natural world, a curious synergy emerges. The titles of these videos, crafted to captivate and compel clicks, find themselves entwined with humanity's evergreen fascination with avian wanderlust during rainfall. We embark on this research endeavor with an air of both scholarly rigor and digital whimsy, in pursuit of unraveling the peculiar alignment of outlandish video titles and plaintive avian queries.
As we delve into the foraging grounds of this peculiar nexus of digital content and avian intrigue, we seek not only to unmask the elusive relationship between Deep Look video titles and 'where do birds go when it rains' Google searches but also to tease out the underlying implications for both the natural world and the digital landscape. Our pursuit is not merely a flight of fancy but a valiant quest to uncover the serendipitous symphony of avian musings and online media trends. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear reader, as we embark on a journey that is equal parts analytical astuteness and digital dexterity, aiming to shed light on the featherbrained connection between human curiosity and avian wanderlust.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To elucidate the unsuspecting correlation between the allure of Deep Look YouTube video titles and the Google searches for "where do birds go when it rains," we employed a multi-faceted methodology that sought to capture the capricious essence of internet trends and avian intrigue. Our data collection and analysis spanned the years 2014 to 2023, encompassing a broad spectrum of digital content and search activity.

The first phase of our methodological concoction involved the meticulous extraction and cataloging of Deep Look video titles. Employing a combination of AI text mining, natural language processing, and a dash of naturalist intuition, we compiled a compendium of titles from the Deep Look YouTube channel. This involved sifting through a plethora of titles, ranging from whimsical wonders to thought-provoking ponderings, in order to capture the variegated tapestry of video titles that have graced the digital sphere.

Simultaneously, on the avian end of the spectrum, we plunged into the depths of Google Trends to capture the ebb and flow of the perennial query, "where do birds go when it rains." Indeed, our intrepid journey into the labyrinthine landscape of online searches offered a glimpse into the collective curiosity surrounding avian behavior amidst precipitation. This phase also involved a touch of digital augury, as we ventured to discern the subtle nuances in the frequency and intensity of these avian musings over the years.

Once our two-fold feast of data was laid bare, we subjected it to the tantalizing throes of statistical analysis. Engaging in the delicate dance of correlation coefficients, significance testing, and the artful interpretation of p-values, we unveiled the hitherto uncharted correlation between the trendiness of Deep Look video titles and the waxing and waning of Google searches dedicated to avian precipitation predicaments.

Our statistical foray did not merely stop at establishing the presence of a correlation but also sought to tease out the underlying implications of this featherbrained connection. We considered factors such as seasonality, temporal lags, and the intriguing interplay between video title trends and the digital zeitgeist, all while keeping a discerning eye on the whimsical undercurrents of this peculiar correlation.

It is essential to note that amidst the rigors of statistical analysis, our team embraced an attitude of scholarly mirth, recognizing the playfulness inherent in unraveling such an unexpected association. The endeavor, though grounded in statistical acumen, carried a touch of levity as we navigated the capricious tides of algorithmic whimsy and avian fancy.

In conclusion, the methodology employed in this research was a tapestry woven with threads of technological prowess, naturalistic intrigue, and statistical gravitas, all carefully intertwined to capture the surreptitious connection between Deep Look video titles and the perennial avian quandary of rainfall refuge. So, as we untangle this digital avian knot, remember, dear reader, that sometimes, even the most whimsical questions can lead to gripping insights and unexpected revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends .

For the time period 2014 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9094935, r-squared of 0.8271784, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Flocking Together: The Featherbrained Connection Between Trendy Deep Look YouTube Video Titles and 'Where Do Birds Go When It Rains' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the saying goes, birds of a feather flock together. In this paper, we present the findings of our research on the surprising correlation between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and the frequency of Google searches for the age-old query, "where do birds go when it rains." Employing a comprehensive analysis of data derived from artificial intelligence (AI) examination of YouTube video titles and Google Trends, our research has unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9094935 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023. The implications of this unexpected correlation go beyond the feathers of scientific inquiry and delve into the uncharted territories of avian curiosity, digital media trends, and the whimsical wonders of the internet. Our findings not only offer a new lens through which to view the behavioral patterns of both birds and internet users but also serve as a striking reminder of the captivatingly unpredictable connections that can emerge in the digital realm. So, the next time you find yourself pondering the elusive whereabouts of rain-drenched birds, remember that the internet may hold the key—and perhaps the birds are not as flighty as we thought.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the age of information abundance and algorithmic serendipity, we are constantly bombarded with an endless array of digital content. Among the myriad topics that pique our collective curiosity, the behavior of avian creatures and their coping mechanisms in inclement weather may seem like a trivial pursuit. However, as researchers, we hold the unshakable belief that even the most seemingly whimsical queries can unravel profound insights.
The fascination with avian behavior during rainfall has long permeated human curiosity. Among the countless ponderings that arise during a rainy day, the question "where do birds go when it rains" has persevered as a timeless inquiry of both scientific and poetic significance. We are, after all, a species perennially piqued by the behavior of our feathered companions, often pondering their fleeting whereabouts when precipitation descends from the skies. This age-old inquiry, with its head in the clouds and its heart amidst the plumage, has now crossed paths with the modern phenomena of online video content consumption.
As we enter the world of Deep Look, a YouTube channel known for its meticulously crafted videos exploring the wonders of the natural world, a curious synergy emerges. The titles of these videos, crafted to captivate and compel clicks, find themselves entwined with humanity's evergreen fascination with avian wanderlust during rainfall. We embark on this research endeavor with an air of both scholarly rigor and digital whimsy, in pursuit of unraveling the peculiar alignment of outlandish video titles and plaintive avian queries.
As we delve into the foraging grounds of this peculiar nexus of digital content and avian intrigue, we seek not only to unmask the elusive relationship between Deep Look video titles and 'where do birds go when it rains' Google searches but also to tease out the underlying implications for both the natural world and the digital landscape. Our pursuit is not merely a flight of fancy but a valiant quest to uncover the serendipitous symphony of avian musings and online media trends. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear reader, as we embark on a journey that is equal parts analytical astuteness and digital dexterity, aiming to shed light on the featherbrained connection between human curiosity and avian wanderlust.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles and Google searches for "where do birds go when it rains." The correlation coefficient of 0.9094935 and an r-squared value of 0.8271784 signify a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. This statistically significant association, with a significance level of p < 0.01, suggests that the trendiness of Deep Look video titles is closely linked to the frequency of queries about avian behavior during rainfall.

As shown in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the striking correlation between the two variables. The data points coalesce into a pattern that echoes the harmonious synchronization of avian intrigue and digital media trends. The implications of this correlation extend beyond the realm of statistical analysis and venture into the captivating and enigmatic intersection of human curiosity, online content consumption, and avian whimsy.

The findings from our research challenge traditional paradigms and highlight the unexpected connections that can emerge in the digital landscape. It appears that the allure of voguish video titles has a palpable influence on the collective musings about the behavior of our feathered friends in the midst of precipitation. The whimsy of the internet, it seems, knows no bounds and extends its reach even to the skies, where our avian companions navigate the capricious weather conditions.

In conclusion, our research has brought to light a correlation that transcends the conventional boundaries of scientific inquiry and invites contemplation of the delightful intertwining of online trends and the timeless queries that have captured human imagination. As we reflect on the featherbrained connection between trendy video titles and avian wanderlust, we are reminded that even the most unlikely pairings can flutter into the forefront of our collective curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Flocking Together: The Featherbrained Connection Between Trendy Deep Look YouTube Video Titles and 'Where Do Birds Go When It Rains' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the saying goes, birds of a feather flock together. In this paper, we present the findings of our research on the surprising correlation between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and the frequency of Google searches for the age-old query, "where do birds go when it rains." Employing a comprehensive analysis of data derived from artificial intelligence (AI) examination of YouTube video titles and Google Trends, our research has unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9094935 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023. The implications of this unexpected correlation go beyond the feathers of scientific inquiry and delve into the uncharted territories of avian curiosity, digital media trends, and the whimsical wonders of the internet. Our findings not only offer a new lens through which to view the behavioral patterns of both birds and internet users but also serve as a striking reminder of the captivatingly unpredictable connections that can emerge in the digital realm. So, the next time you find yourself pondering the elusive whereabouts of rain-drenched birds, remember that the internet may hold the key—and perhaps the birds are not as flighty as we thought.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work titled "Feathered Friends: A Comprehensive Study of Avian Behavior in Inclement Weather," Smith and Doe conducted a thorough investigation into the age-old query "where do birds go when it rains." Their extensive field observations and meticulous data analysis yielded valuable insights into the shelter-seeking tendencies of various bird species during rainfall. Moreover, their research laid a solid foundation for subsequent inquiries delving into the whimsical wanderings of our avian counterparts.
Jones, in "The Ecology of Precipitation: A Synthesis of Avifauna Responses to Rainfall," further expanded upon the nuanced intricacies of avian behavior in response to precipitation. By examining bird habitats and behavioral patterns during rainy conditions, Jones shed light on the diverse strategies employed by birds to seek refuge from inclement weather. These studies formed the bedrock of our understanding of avian behavior in the face of rainfall, setting the stage for our investigation into the surprising correlation between Deep Look YouTube video titles and Google searches for "where do birds go when it rains."
Turning to the realm of non-fiction literature, we find "The Secret Lives of Birds" by David Attenborough and "Birds in Their Natural Habitat" by John James Audubon, both of which provide detailed accounts of avian behavior and habitat preferences. While these works offer invaluable knowledge about the intricacies of avian life, they do not directly address the intersection of digital media trends and avian curiosity.
In the realm of fiction, the classic novel "To Kill a Mockingbird" by Harper Lee and the whimsical tale "Jonathan Livingston Seagull" by Richard Bach indirectly touch upon the themes of avian behavior and aspirations. While these literary works offer profound philosophical musings on avian consciousness and societal dynamics, they do not directly inform our investigation into the correlation between Deep Look YouTube video titles and 'where do birds go when it rains' Google searches.
In the realm of visual media, cartoons such as "Tweety Bird" and children's shows like "Sesame Street" featuring feathered characters provide an anthropomorphic lens through which to observe avian behavior. While these animated and educational programs offer a delightful portrayal of avian antics, they do not rigorously explore the correlation between online video trends and avian queries.
As we navigate through this eclectic tapestry of literature and media, we approach our research inquiry with a spirit of curiosity and a pinch of digital delight, recognizing the unconventional intersections that await our exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles and Google searches for "where do birds go when it rains." The correlation coefficient of 0.9094935 and an r-squared value of 0.8271784 signify a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. This statistically significant association, with a significance level of p < 0.01, suggests that the trendiness of Deep Look video titles is closely linked to the frequency of queries about avian behavior during rainfall.
As shown in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the striking correlation between the two variables. The data points coalesce into a pattern that echoes the harmonious synchronization of avian intrigue and digital media trends. The implications of this correlation extend beyond the realm of statistical analysis and venture into the captivating and enigmatic intersection of human curiosity, online content consumption, and avian whimsy.
The findings from our research challenge traditional paradigms and highlight the unexpected connections that can emerge in the digital landscape. It appears that the allure of voguish video titles has a palpable influence on the collective musings about the behavior of our feathered friends in the midst of precipitation. The whimsy of the internet, it seems, knows no bounds and extends its reach even to the skies, where our avian companions navigate the capricious weather conditions.
In conclusion, our research has brought to light a correlation that transcends the conventional boundaries of scientific inquiry and invites contemplation of the delightful intertwining of online trends and the timeless queries that have captured human imagination. As we reflect on the featherbrained connection between trendy video titles and avian wanderlust, we are reminded that even the most unlikely pairings can flutter into the forefront of our collective curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our research have unveiled a striking correlation between the voguishness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and the frequency of Google searches for "where do birds go when it rains." This unexpected connection adds a feather to the cap of avian curiosity, online content trends, and the peculiar predilections of the digital age.

Building upon the whimsical foundation of prior works investigating avian behavior in precipitation, our study not only reinforces the intricate web of factors influencing bird-related queries but also introduces a flutter of unpredictability in the realm of online content consumption. The findings of Smith and Doe, meticulously uncovering the refuge-seeking tendencies of our feathered friends during rainfall, set the stage for our examination of the correlation between digital media trends and avian inquisitiveness. Furthermore, Jones' comprehensive elucidation of avifauna responses to rainfall provided a substantive framework for understanding the dynamic interplay between avian behavior and inclement weather, preening the way for our exploration into the curious intersection with online video titles.

Expanding upon this foundation, our research has not only corroborated but also embellished the understanding of avian inquisitiveness during inclement weather. Our statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9094935 echoes the harmonious synchronicity between the trendy titles of Deep Look videos and human curiosity about avian whereabouts when the heavens open. This result not only underlines the profound interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena but also showcases the whimsical wonders of the internet landscape, where avian intrigue and digital trends nestle together in a captivating tapestry of online queries.

As we unfurl the wings of our investigation, it becomes evident that the quizzical queries and trendy video titles are not as distant as the North and South Poles. Much like the murmuration of starlings, the correlation between these variables swirls with an elegant grace that captures the essence of avian wanderlust and digital curiosity. While our findings may ruffle some traditional scientific feathers, they belay the beauty of unexpected connections in the vast aviary of digital data.

In recounting the featherbrained connection between trendy video titles and avian wanderlust, we invite further scholarly scrutiny into the multi-faceted whimsy that pervades the intersection of digital content trends and age-old avian queries. Our investigation has chirped a new tune in the symphony of scientific inquiry, and we eagerly anticipate the delightful flight of discovery that awaits in this uncharted digital wilderness.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Flocking Together: The Featherbrained Connection Between Trendy Deep Look YouTube Video Titles and 'Where Do Birds Go When It Rains' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the saying goes, birds of a feather flock together. In this paper, we present the findings of our research on the surprising correlation between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and the frequency of Google searches for the age-old query, "where do birds go when it rains." Employing a comprehensive analysis of data derived from artificial intelligence (AI) examination of YouTube video titles and Google Trends, our research has unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9094935 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023. The implications of this unexpected correlation go beyond the feathers of scientific inquiry and delve into the uncharted territories of avian curiosity, digital media trends, and the whimsical wonders of the internet. Our findings not only offer a new lens through which to view the behavioral patterns of both birds and internet users but also serve as a striking reminder of the captivatingly unpredictable connections that can emerge in the digital realm. So, the next time you find yourself pondering the elusive whereabouts of rain-drenched birds, remember that the internet may hold the key—and perhaps the birds are not as flighty as we thought.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the age of information abundance and algorithmic serendipity, we are constantly bombarded with an endless array of digital content. Among the myriad topics that pique our collective curiosity, the behavior of avian creatures and their coping mechanisms in inclement weather may seem like a trivial pursuit. However, as researchers, we hold the unshakable belief that even the most seemingly whimsical queries can unravel profound insights.
The fascination with avian behavior during rainfall has long permeated human curiosity. Among the countless ponderings that arise during a rainy day, the question "where do birds go when it rains" has persevered as a timeless inquiry of both scientific and poetic significance. We are, after all, a species perennially piqued by the behavior of our feathered companions, often pondering their fleeting whereabouts when precipitation descends from the skies. This age-old inquiry, with its head in the clouds and its heart amidst the plumage, has now crossed paths with the modern phenomena of online video content consumption.
As we enter the world of Deep Look, a YouTube channel known for its meticulously crafted videos exploring the wonders of the natural world, a curious synergy emerges. The titles of these videos, crafted to captivate and compel clicks, find themselves entwined with humanity's evergreen fascination with avian wanderlust during rainfall. We embark on this research endeavor with an air of both scholarly rigor and digital whimsy, in pursuit of unraveling the peculiar alignment of outlandish video titles and plaintive avian queries.
As we delve into the foraging grounds of this peculiar nexus of digital content and avian intrigue, we seek not only to unmask the elusive relationship between Deep Look video titles and 'where do birds go when it rains' Google searches but also to tease out the underlying implications for both the natural world and the digital landscape. Our pursuit is not merely a flight of fancy but a valiant quest to uncover the serendipitous symphony of avian musings and online media trends. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear reader, as we embark on a journey that is equal parts analytical astuteness and digital dexterity, aiming to shed light on the featherbrained connection between human curiosity and avian wanderlust.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles and Google searches for "where do birds go when it rains." The correlation coefficient of 0.9094935 and an r-squared value of 0.8271784 signify a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. This statistically significant association, with a significance level of p < 0.01, suggests that the trendiness of Deep Look video titles is closely linked to the frequency of queries about avian behavior during rainfall.
As shown in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the striking correlation between the two variables. The data points coalesce into a pattern that echoes the harmonious synchronization of avian intrigue and digital media trends. The implications of this correlation extend beyond the realm of statistical analysis and venture into the captivating and enigmatic intersection of human curiosity, online content consumption, and avian whimsy.
The findings from our research challenge traditional paradigms and highlight the unexpected connections that can emerge in the digital landscape. It appears that the allure of voguish video titles has a palpable influence on the collective musings about the behavior of our feathered friends in the midst of precipitation. The whimsy of the internet, it seems, knows no bounds and extends its reach even to the skies, where our avian companions navigate the capricious weather conditions.
In conclusion, our research has brought to light a correlation that transcends the conventional boundaries of scientific inquiry and invites contemplation of the delightful intertwining of online trends and the timeless queries that have captured human imagination. As we reflect on the featherbrained connection between trendy video titles and avian wanderlust, we are reminded that even the most unlikely pairings can flutter into the forefront of our collective curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has feathered the nest of academic inquiry with the revelation of a remarkable correlation between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and the frequency of 'where do birds go when it rains' Google searches. The statistically significant association we've uncovered highlights the unexpected interconnectedness of online media trends and bird-related queries.

As the data spreads its wings in Figure 1, one cannot help but marvel at the synchronicity of avian intrigue and digital media trends. It seems that the allure of voguish video titles exerts a magnetic pull on the collective musings about the whereabouts of rain-drenched birds.

The implications of our findings are akin to a bird's eye view of the digital landscape, unveiling the whimsical wonders that permeate the intersection of human curiosity and avian wanderlust. However, one must tread carefully in this realm, for even the most trivial queries may lead to a flock of enlightening discoveries.

However, as we venture to unveil the intertwined world of YouTube titles and bird behavior queries, it's essential to recognize that not all correlations come with causation perched on their shoulders. It is possible that this correlation may be the result of chance, or perhaps a third underlying factor may be ruffling the feathers of both phenomena.

In light of these findings, we are confident that this research marks the crowning achievement in the study of avian curiosity and digital media trends. As such, we assert that no further research is required in this area, hence freeing the scholarly audience from further ornithologically oriented statistical investigations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Flocking Together: The Featherbrained Connection Between Trendy Deep Look YouTube Video Titles and 'Where Do Birds Go When It Rains' Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Avian Internet Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Flocking Together: The Featherbrained Connection Between Trendy Deep Look YouTube Video Titles and 'Where Do Birds Go When It Rains' Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for Avian Internet Behavior and Ecology Research (SAIBER)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Flocking Together: The Featherbrained Connection Between Trendy Deep Look YouTube Video Titles and 'Where Do Birds Go When It Rains' Google Searches with an abstract of As the saying goes, birds of a feather flock together. In this paper, we present the findings of our research on the surprising correlation between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and the frequency of Google searches for the age-old query, "where do birds go when it rains." Employing a comprehensive analysis of data derived from artificial intelligence (AI) examination of YouTube video titles and Google Trends, our research has unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9094935 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023. The implications of this unexpected correlation go beyond the feathers of scientific inquiry and delve into the uncharted territories of avian curiosity, digital media trends, and the whimsical wonders of the internet. Our findings not only offer a new lens through which to view the behavioral patterns of both birds and internet users but also serve as a striking reminder of the captivatingly unpredictable connections that can emerge in the digital realm. So, the next time you find yourself pondering the elusive whereabouts of rain-drenched birds, remember that the internet may hold the key—and perhaps the birds are not as flighty as we thought.

ChatGPT:

YouTube video titles, bird behavior, Google search trends, correlation analysis, Deep Look, internet users, AI analysis, digital media trends, avian curiosity

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are

Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains'

Correlation r = 0.9094935 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8271784 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are) over the 10 years from 2014 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00026. 0.0002628639054019990000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.026% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,804 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.65, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2014201520162017201820192020202120222023
How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are (Trendiness score)7.86.756.52176.47626.856.56.52386.56.93486.6667
Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains' (Rel. search volume)10.7532.083331.751.51.636361.916671.751.727271.88889




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7.8,6.75,6.5217,6.4762,6.85,6.5,6.5238,6.5,6.9348,6.6667,])
array_2 = np.array([10.75,3,2.08333,1.75,1.5,1.63636,1.91667,1.75,1.72727,1.88889,])
array_1_name = "How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 4295 · Black Variable ID: 25938 · Red Variable ID: 1468
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0