about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,292 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of actuaries in Kansas and the second variable is Total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

More actuaries in Kansas means more precise calculations of the optimal length for YouTube videos, leading to increased engagement and a greater number of comments on LEMMiNO's videos. It's a testament to the exponential comment-boosting power of number-crunching professionals in the Sunflower State.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [A photo-realistic image] In a picturesque scene, amidst the rolling hills of Kansas, a group of actuaries sit at a wooden table surrounded by data charts and graphs bathed in warm sunlight. With intense focus, they meticulously examine the numbers, pens poised over paper, as they calculate the optimal length for LEMMiNO's YouTube videos. The soft glow of the computer screen in the background displays the total comments on LEMMiNO's videos steadily increasing, contrasting the tranquil environment with the digital activity. The combination of the precise calculations by the actuaries and the growing engagement is visually impactful, highlighting the unique comment-boosting power generated by these number-crunching professionals in the Sunflower State. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of actuaries in Kansas and Total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Parallax art a Polaroid photo Cyberpunk A photo-realistic image Surrealism
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of actuaries in Kansas and Total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos, in the following situation: More actuaries in Kansas means more precise calculations of the optimal length for YouTube videos, leading to increased engagement and a greater number of comments on LEMMiNO's videos. It's a testament to the exponential comment-boosting power of number-crunching professionals in the Sunflower State.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a picturesque scene, amidst the rolling hills of Kansas, a group of actuaries meticulously examine data charts and graphs, calculating the optimal length for LEMMiNO's YouTube videos. In the background, a computer screen displays the total comments on LEMMiNO's videos steadily increasing. The combination of the precise calculations by the actuaries and the growing engagement is a testament to the unique comment-boosting power generated by these number-crunching professionals in the Sunflower State.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In a picturesque scene, amidst the rolling hills of Kansas, a group of actuaries meticulously examine data charts and graphs, calculating the optimal length for LEMMiNO's YouTube videos. In the background, a computer screen displays the total comments on LEMMiNO's videos steadily increasing. The combination of the precise calculations by the actuaries and the growing engagement is a testament to the unique comment-boosting power generated by these number-crunching professionals in the Sunflower State. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [A photo-realistic image] In a picturesque scene, amidst the rolling hills of Kansas, a group of actuaries sit at a wooden table surrounded by data charts and graphs bathed in warm sunlight. With intense focus, they meticulously examine the numbers, pens poised over paper, as they calculate the optimal length for LEMMiNO's YouTube videos. The soft glow of the computer screen in the background displays the total comments on LEMMiNO's videos steadily increasing, contrasting the tranquil environment with the digital activity. The combination of the precise calculations by the actuaries and the growing engagement is visually impactful, highlighting the unique comment-boosting power generated by these number-crunching professionals in the Sunflower State.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in The number of actuaries in Kansas positively influenced Total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Actuarial Attraction: Analyzing the Quirky Correlation Between the Number of Actuaries in Kansas and Total Comments on LEMMiNO YouTube Videos

The Journal of Quirky Correlations in Social Science Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of actuaries in Kansas and Total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9258534 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Actuarial Attraction: Analyzing the Quirky Correlation Between the Number of Actuaries in Kansas and Total Comments on LEMMiNO YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected and perplexing relationship between the number of actuaries in the state of Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Using data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9258534 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2022. The implications of this correlation are significant, raising questions about the potential influence of actuarial trends on online engagement with esoteric YouTube content. This paper aims to humorously unravel this improbable correlation and provoke contemplation on the intricate enigma of how apparently distinct phenomena may intertwine in unforeseen ways.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of actuaries in Kansas and Total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Actuarial Attraction: Analyzing the Quirky Correlation Between the Number of Actuaries in Kansas and Total Comments on LEMMiNO YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected and perplexing relationship between the number of actuaries in the state of Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Using data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9258534 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2022. The implications of this correlation are significant, raising questions about the potential influence of actuarial trends on online engagement with esoteric YouTube content. This paper aims to humorously unravel this improbable correlation and provoke contemplation on the intricate enigma of how apparently distinct phenomena may intertwine in unforeseen ways.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The correlation between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated researchers and casual ponderers alike. In the annals of statistical analysis, one would be hard-pressed to find a more unexpected pair than the number of actuaries in the bucolic plains of Kansas and the total comments gracing the enigmatic videos of LEMMiNO on YouTube. One has to wonder, what could possibly link the precise and meticulous world of actuarial science with the enigmatic allure of YouTube content that probes the unfathomable mysteries of our universe?

This paper seeks to explore this improbable connection, bringing together the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the bowels of YouTube's comment sections. Our research team stumbled upon a correlation coefficient of 0.9258534, a p-value less than 0.01, and a host of raised eyebrows. The statistical significance of this linkage raises questions as profound as they are unconventional. What unseen forces prompt a surge in comments on obscure YouTube videos concurrently with the rise in the number of number-crunching wizards in the Sunflower State?

As we endeavor to unravel this confounding correlation, it is important to acknowledge the potential implications of our findings. Do the number of actuaries in Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO videos merely dance together in a statistical waltz, or is there a deeper, more intrinsic connection at play? Could it be that the aura of mathematical precision exuded by actuaries somehow enchants the denizens of online spheres, drawing them into the esoteric embrace of YouTube's most cryptic content? These questions, while whimsical, merit thoughtful consideration, as they speak not only to the quirky nature of statistics, but also to the hidden threads that weave through the fabric of human behavior.

With this in mind, we embark on a journey through the labyrinthine corridors of correlated data, navigating the peculiar landscape where the abacus meets the algorithm, and where the seemingly mundane Midwest intersects with the cyberspace of curious commenters. Join us as we seek to shed light on this unlikely pairing, shedding a bit of statistical humor along the way, and illuminating the unexpected intersections that lie hidden within the tapestry of modern existence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of actuaries in Kansas and Total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Actuarial Attraction: Analyzing the Quirky Correlation Between the Number of Actuaries in Kansas and Total Comments on LEMMiNO YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected and perplexing relationship between the number of actuaries in the state of Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Using data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9258534 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2022. The implications of this correlation are significant, raising questions about the potential influence of actuarial trends on online engagement with esoteric YouTube content. This paper aims to humorously unravel this improbable correlation and provoke contemplation on the intricate enigma of how apparently distinct phenomena may intertwine in unforeseen ways.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The correlation between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated researchers and casual ponderers alike. In the annals of statistical analysis, one would be hard-pressed to find a more unexpected pair than the number of actuaries in the bucolic plains of Kansas and the total comments gracing the enigmatic videos of LEMMiNO on YouTube. One has to wonder, what could possibly link the precise and meticulous world of actuarial science with the enigmatic allure of YouTube content that probes the unfathomable mysteries of our universe?
This paper seeks to explore this improbable connection, bringing together the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the bowels of YouTube's comment sections. Our research team stumbled upon a correlation coefficient of 0.9258534, a p-value less than 0.01, and a host of raised eyebrows. The statistical significance of this linkage raises questions as profound as they are unconventional. What unseen forces prompt a surge in comments on obscure YouTube videos concurrently with the rise in the number of number-crunching wizards in the Sunflower State?
As we endeavor to unravel this confounding correlation, it is important to acknowledge the potential implications of our findings. Do the number of actuaries in Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO videos merely dance together in a statistical waltz, or is there a deeper, more intrinsic connection at play? Could it be that the aura of mathematical precision exuded by actuaries somehow enchants the denizens of online spheres, drawing them into the esoteric embrace of YouTube's most cryptic content? These questions, while whimsical, merit thoughtful consideration, as they speak not only to the quirky nature of statistics, but also to the hidden threads that weave through the fabric of human behavior.
With this in mind, we embark on a journey through the labyrinthine corridors of correlated data, navigating the peculiar landscape where the abacus meets the algorithm, and where the seemingly mundane Midwest intersects with the cyberspace of curious commenters. Join us as we seek to shed light on this unlikely pairing, shedding a bit of statistical humor along the way, and illuminating the unexpected intersections that lie hidden within the tapestry of modern existence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Numerous scholarly explorations have been conducted to probe the intricate relationships between seemingly unconnected phenomena. Smith (2010) delves into the unexpected connections between agricultural tendencies and patterns of online shopping, while Doe (2015) has shed light on the curious correlation between the sale of umbrellas and the consumption of ice cream. Jones (2018) has sought to untangle the enigma of the link between cat ownership and televised talent shows. Within this scholarly context, the present study aims to add to the discourse by investigating the perplexing correspondence between the number of actuaries in Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos.

Turning to pertinent literature addressing the realms of mathematics and online content consumption, "The Joy of x" by Steven Strogatz and "How Not To Be Wrong: The Power of Mathematical Thinking" by Jordan Ellenberg offer insightful perspectives on mathematical concepts and their subtle impact on various facets of human existence. Albeit not directly related to the specific phenomena under investigation, these texts provide a valuable backdrop for understanding the cultural and cognitive influences that may underpin the correlation observed in the present study.

In a rather unexpected turn of events, the fictional writings of Douglas Adams in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" and Italo Calvino's "If on a winter's night a traveler" also offer intriguing parallels to the unlikely connection being explored. Both books meander through surreal and peculiar narrative landscapes, akin to the meandering paths of statistical correlation that this study seeks to unravel. While these works may not provide direct empirical evidence, they do invite a whimsical consideration of the inexplicable harmonies that may exist within the universe.

Not to be overshadowed by the weighty tomes of academic literature and fiction, a retrospective exploration of childhood cartoon shows and their portrayal of numbers and esoteric themes yields a surprisingly relevant array of associations. "Cyberchase," with its spirited band of animated characters embarking on mathematically-inclined adventures, and "The Magic School Bus," featuring its intrepid teacher Ms. Frizzle and her students traversing the enigmatic realms of science, provide an inadvertent primer for the improbable overlap of actuarial matters and online engagement. As the paper unfolds, it becomes increasingly clear that the peculiar threads of association between actuaries and YouTube comments may have been quietly woven into the fabric of popular culture all along.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of actuaries in Kansas and Total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Actuarial Attraction: Analyzing the Quirky Correlation Between the Number of Actuaries in Kansas and Total Comments on LEMMiNO YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected and perplexing relationship between the number of actuaries in the state of Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Using data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9258534 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2022. The implications of this correlation are significant, raising questions about the potential influence of actuarial trends on online engagement with esoteric YouTube content. This paper aims to humorously unravel this improbable correlation and provoke contemplation on the intricate enigma of how apparently distinct phenomena may intertwine in unforeseen ways.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The correlation between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated researchers and casual ponderers alike. In the annals of statistical analysis, one would be hard-pressed to find a more unexpected pair than the number of actuaries in the bucolic plains of Kansas and the total comments gracing the enigmatic videos of LEMMiNO on YouTube. One has to wonder, what could possibly link the precise and meticulous world of actuarial science with the enigmatic allure of YouTube content that probes the unfathomable mysteries of our universe?
This paper seeks to explore this improbable connection, bringing together the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the bowels of YouTube's comment sections. Our research team stumbled upon a correlation coefficient of 0.9258534, a p-value less than 0.01, and a host of raised eyebrows. The statistical significance of this linkage raises questions as profound as they are unconventional. What unseen forces prompt a surge in comments on obscure YouTube videos concurrently with the rise in the number of number-crunching wizards in the Sunflower State?
As we endeavor to unravel this confounding correlation, it is important to acknowledge the potential implications of our findings. Do the number of actuaries in Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO videos merely dance together in a statistical waltz, or is there a deeper, more intrinsic connection at play? Could it be that the aura of mathematical precision exuded by actuaries somehow enchants the denizens of online spheres, drawing them into the esoteric embrace of YouTube's most cryptic content? These questions, while whimsical, merit thoughtful consideration, as they speak not only to the quirky nature of statistics, but also to the hidden threads that weave through the fabric of human behavior.
With this in mind, we embark on a journey through the labyrinthine corridors of correlated data, navigating the peculiar landscape where the abacus meets the algorithm, and where the seemingly mundane Midwest intersects with the cyberspace of curious commenters. Join us as we seek to shed light on this unlikely pairing, shedding a bit of statistical humor along the way, and illuminating the unexpected intersections that lie hidden within the tapestry of modern existence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on the quest to untangle this enigmatic correlation, data on the number of actuaries in Kansas was gathered from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This captivating dataset spanning the years 2012 to 2022 revealed the fascinating fluctuations in the population of risk-savvy individuals navigating the Midwest terrain. One might say, it was a veritable rollercoaster of actuarial prowess!

As for the YouTube side of the equation, total comments on LEMMiNO videos were meticulously extracted from the depths of the internet. The captivating blend of esoteric content and thought-provoking mysteries provided an intriguing backdrop for our research. The comment count data revealed the ebb and flow of virtual musings, as viewers grappled with the enigmatic allure of LEMMiNO's creations.

Correlating these two, shall we say, eclectic datasets required a rigorous approach. Through the magic of statistical analysis, we computed the correlation coefficient and p-value using an array of complex algorithms that would make even the most seasoned mathematician nod in approval. The stout correlation coefficient of 0.9258534 and a p-value of less than 0.01 emerged from this careful yet whimsical dance of numbers.

The unexpected connection between the number of actuaries in Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos came to light through this intricate web of data, leaving our research team both bemused and beguiled. The statistical significance of this correlation beckoned further investigation, prompting us to dissect the implications with a humorously serious approach.

In conclusion, this methodological odyssey led us to the doorstep of a surprisingly robust correlation, beckoning us to consider the peculiar bonds that weave through the fabric of human interactions. As we delve into the intricate details of this curious correlation, we invite you, dear reader, to join us in this whimsical journey through the quirky intersections of statistics and human behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of actuaries in Kansas and Total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9258534, r-squared of 0.8572045, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Actuarial Attraction: Analyzing the Quirky Correlation Between the Number of Actuaries in Kansas and Total Comments on LEMMiNO YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected and perplexing relationship between the number of actuaries in the state of Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Using data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9258534 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2022. The implications of this correlation are significant, raising questions about the potential influence of actuarial trends on online engagement with esoteric YouTube content. This paper aims to humorously unravel this improbable correlation and provoke contemplation on the intricate enigma of how apparently distinct phenomena may intertwine in unforeseen ways.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The correlation between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated researchers and casual ponderers alike. In the annals of statistical analysis, one would be hard-pressed to find a more unexpected pair than the number of actuaries in the bucolic plains of Kansas and the total comments gracing the enigmatic videos of LEMMiNO on YouTube. One has to wonder, what could possibly link the precise and meticulous world of actuarial science with the enigmatic allure of YouTube content that probes the unfathomable mysteries of our universe?
This paper seeks to explore this improbable connection, bringing together the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the bowels of YouTube's comment sections. Our research team stumbled upon a correlation coefficient of 0.9258534, a p-value less than 0.01, and a host of raised eyebrows. The statistical significance of this linkage raises questions as profound as they are unconventional. What unseen forces prompt a surge in comments on obscure YouTube videos concurrently with the rise in the number of number-crunching wizards in the Sunflower State?
As we endeavor to unravel this confounding correlation, it is important to acknowledge the potential implications of our findings. Do the number of actuaries in Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO videos merely dance together in a statistical waltz, or is there a deeper, more intrinsic connection at play? Could it be that the aura of mathematical precision exuded by actuaries somehow enchants the denizens of online spheres, drawing them into the esoteric embrace of YouTube's most cryptic content? These questions, while whimsical, merit thoughtful consideration, as they speak not only to the quirky nature of statistics, but also to the hidden threads that weave through the fabric of human behavior.
With this in mind, we embark on a journey through the labyrinthine corridors of correlated data, navigating the peculiar landscape where the abacus meets the algorithm, and where the seemingly mundane Midwest intersects with the cyberspace of curious commenters. Join us as we seek to shed light on this unlikely pairing, shedding a bit of statistical humor along the way, and illuminating the unexpected intersections that lie hidden within the tapestry of modern existence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

A significant and robust correlation was observed between the number of actuaries in Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos for the time period from 2012 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9258534, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.8572045, surpassed expectations and raised eyebrows among the research team, prompting both amusement and astonishment. The p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforced the strength of this unexpected linkage.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually portrays the strong positive correlation between these two seemingly disparate variables, offering a whimsical juxtaposition of actuarial trends and online engagement with enigmatic YouTube content. This finding adds a touch of statistical humor to the ongoing quest to decipher unpredictable patterns in the ever-surprising realm of data analysis.

The implications of this correlation extend far beyond the borders of Kansas and the virtual landscapes of YouTube. The striking connection between the meticulous world of actuarial science and the boundless realm of online interaction brings a lighthearted twist to the otherwise staid domain of statistical analysis. As we reflect upon this unlikely pairing, one cannot help but ponder the quirky and often inexplicable interplay of variables that underscore the colorful tapestry of human experience.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of actuaries in Kansas and Total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Actuarial Attraction: Analyzing the Quirky Correlation Between the Number of Actuaries in Kansas and Total Comments on LEMMiNO YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected and perplexing relationship between the number of actuaries in the state of Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Using data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9258534 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2022. The implications of this correlation are significant, raising questions about the potential influence of actuarial trends on online engagement with esoteric YouTube content. This paper aims to humorously unravel this improbable correlation and provoke contemplation on the intricate enigma of how apparently distinct phenomena may intertwine in unforeseen ways.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Numerous scholarly explorations have been conducted to probe the intricate relationships between seemingly unconnected phenomena. Smith (2010) delves into the unexpected connections between agricultural tendencies and patterns of online shopping, while Doe (2015) has shed light on the curious correlation between the sale of umbrellas and the consumption of ice cream. Jones (2018) has sought to untangle the enigma of the link between cat ownership and televised talent shows. Within this scholarly context, the present study aims to add to the discourse by investigating the perplexing correspondence between the number of actuaries in Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos.
Turning to pertinent literature addressing the realms of mathematics and online content consumption, "The Joy of x" by Steven Strogatz and "How Not To Be Wrong: The Power of Mathematical Thinking" by Jordan Ellenberg offer insightful perspectives on mathematical concepts and their subtle impact on various facets of human existence. Albeit not directly related to the specific phenomena under investigation, these texts provide a valuable backdrop for understanding the cultural and cognitive influences that may underpin the correlation observed in the present study.
In a rather unexpected turn of events, the fictional writings of Douglas Adams in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" and Italo Calvino's "If on a winter's night a traveler" also offer intriguing parallels to the unlikely connection being explored. Both books meander through surreal and peculiar narrative landscapes, akin to the meandering paths of statistical correlation that this study seeks to unravel. While these works may not provide direct empirical evidence, they do invite a whimsical consideration of the inexplicable harmonies that may exist within the universe.
Not to be overshadowed by the weighty tomes of academic literature and fiction, a retrospective exploration of childhood cartoon shows and their portrayal of numbers and esoteric themes yields a surprisingly relevant array of associations. "Cyberchase," with its spirited band of animated characters embarking on mathematically-inclined adventures, and "The Magic School Bus," featuring its intrepid teacher Ms. Frizzle and her students traversing the enigmatic realms of science, provide an inadvertent primer for the improbable overlap of actuarial matters and online engagement. As the paper unfolds, it becomes increasingly clear that the peculiar threads of association between actuaries and YouTube comments may have been quietly woven into the fabric of popular culture all along.

[[RESULTS]]
A significant and robust correlation was observed between the number of actuaries in Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos for the time period from 2012 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9258534, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.8572045, surpassed expectations and raised eyebrows among the research team, prompting both amusement and astonishment. The p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforced the strength of this unexpected linkage.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually portrays the strong positive correlation between these two seemingly disparate variables, offering a whimsical juxtaposition of actuarial trends and online engagement with enigmatic YouTube content. This finding adds a touch of statistical humor to the ongoing quest to decipher unpredictable patterns in the ever-surprising realm of data analysis.
The implications of this correlation extend far beyond the borders of Kansas and the virtual landscapes of YouTube. The striking connection between the meticulous world of actuarial science and the boundless realm of online interaction brings a lighthearted twist to the otherwise staid domain of statistical analysis. As we reflect upon this unlikely pairing, one cannot help but ponder the quirky and often inexplicable interplay of variables that underscore the colorful tapestry of human experience.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study have unearthed a profound and unexpected relationship between the number of actuaries in Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9258534 provides compelling evidence of a striking positive connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. This finding not only astounds but also tickles the imagination with its whimsical confluence of actuarial trends and online engagement.

Our results resonate with prior research that has delved into the curious correspondences between ostensibly unrelated variables. Smith's (2010) investigation into the unexpected links between agricultural tendencies and online shopping habits finds an echo in our study, as both highlight the capacity of distinct factors to intertwine in unanticipated ways. Similarly, the humorous correlation between the sale of umbrellas and the consumption of ice cream, as elucidated by Doe (2015), shares a kinship with our findings, underscoring the delightful unpredictability of human behavior. These parallels serve as a reminder of the delightful surprises that scientific inquiry can unearth, akin to finding a forgotten trinket in the pocket of a long-unused coat.

Moreover, the unexpected resonance between our results and the fictional writings of Adams and Calvino prompts contemplation on the subtle interplay between reality and whimsy. While these literary works do not offer empirical substantiation, their whimsical parallels to our findings invite an endearing consideration of the unexplainable harmonies that may pervade our universe. In a similar vein, the unintentional relevance of childhood cartoon shows to our investigation provides a charming reminder of the indelible impression that seemingly innocuous influences can have on our perceptions of the world.

It is worth noting that despite the lighthearted tone with which our findings have been received, the implications of this correlation warrant thought-provoking consideration. The unexpected partnership between the meticulous world of actuarial science and the boundless realm of online interaction invites us to reflect upon the quirky and often inexplicable interplay of variables that underlie the colorful tapestry of human experience. As we continue to unravel the mysteries of statistical analysis, there is a palpable sense of delight in uncovering the unexpected relationships that animate our world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of actuaries in Kansas and Total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Actuarial Attraction: Analyzing the Quirky Correlation Between the Number of Actuaries in Kansas and Total Comments on LEMMiNO YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected and perplexing relationship between the number of actuaries in the state of Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Using data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9258534 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2022. The implications of this correlation are significant, raising questions about the potential influence of actuarial trends on online engagement with esoteric YouTube content. This paper aims to humorously unravel this improbable correlation and provoke contemplation on the intricate enigma of how apparently distinct phenomena may intertwine in unforeseen ways.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The correlation between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated researchers and casual ponderers alike. In the annals of statistical analysis, one would be hard-pressed to find a more unexpected pair than the number of actuaries in the bucolic plains of Kansas and the total comments gracing the enigmatic videos of LEMMiNO on YouTube. One has to wonder, what could possibly link the precise and meticulous world of actuarial science with the enigmatic allure of YouTube content that probes the unfathomable mysteries of our universe?
This paper seeks to explore this improbable connection, bringing together the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the bowels of YouTube's comment sections. Our research team stumbled upon a correlation coefficient of 0.9258534, a p-value less than 0.01, and a host of raised eyebrows. The statistical significance of this linkage raises questions as profound as they are unconventional. What unseen forces prompt a surge in comments on obscure YouTube videos concurrently with the rise in the number of number-crunching wizards in the Sunflower State?
As we endeavor to unravel this confounding correlation, it is important to acknowledge the potential implications of our findings. Do the number of actuaries in Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO videos merely dance together in a statistical waltz, or is there a deeper, more intrinsic connection at play? Could it be that the aura of mathematical precision exuded by actuaries somehow enchants the denizens of online spheres, drawing them into the esoteric embrace of YouTube's most cryptic content? These questions, while whimsical, merit thoughtful consideration, as they speak not only to the quirky nature of statistics, but also to the hidden threads that weave through the fabric of human behavior.
With this in mind, we embark on a journey through the labyrinthine corridors of correlated data, navigating the peculiar landscape where the abacus meets the algorithm, and where the seemingly mundane Midwest intersects with the cyberspace of curious commenters. Join us as we seek to shed light on this unlikely pairing, shedding a bit of statistical humor along the way, and illuminating the unexpected intersections that lie hidden within the tapestry of modern existence.

[[RESULTS]]
A significant and robust correlation was observed between the number of actuaries in Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos for the time period from 2012 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9258534, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.8572045, surpassed expectations and raised eyebrows among the research team, prompting both amusement and astonishment. The p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforced the strength of this unexpected linkage.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually portrays the strong positive correlation between these two seemingly disparate variables, offering a whimsical juxtaposition of actuarial trends and online engagement with enigmatic YouTube content. This finding adds a touch of statistical humor to the ongoing quest to decipher unpredictable patterns in the ever-surprising realm of data analysis.
The implications of this correlation extend far beyond the borders of Kansas and the virtual landscapes of YouTube. The striking connection between the meticulous world of actuarial science and the boundless realm of online interaction brings a lighthearted twist to the otherwise staid domain of statistical analysis. As we reflect upon this unlikely pairing, one cannot help but ponder the quirky and often inexplicable interplay of variables that underscore the colorful tapestry of human experience.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the unexpectedly robust correlation between the number of actuaries in Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos has left the research team scratching their heads in bemusement. The statistically significant relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables defies conventional wisdom and leaves one pondering the whims of fate and statistical quirkiness. It is quite the head-scratcher to imagine the diligent number-crunchers in Kansas exerting such an influence on the virtual denizens of YouTube, but the data don't lie – or do they?

As we wrap up this deliriously quirky exploration, one cannot help but marvel at the bizarre dance of numbers that underpins our world. From the wide-open plains of Kansas to the vast expanse of YouTube's digital domain, the threads of statistical absurdity weave a tale of inexplicable connection. The aura of actuarial mystique seems to cast an enchanting spell over unsuspecting online wanderers, drawing them into the enigmatic embrace of esoteric YouTube content.

While our findings may induce a chuckle or a raised eyebrow, they also remind us of the perpetual enigma of human behavior and statistical oddities. The association between these two curious phenomena suggests that the universe of data analysis is indeed a place where the unexpected and the lighthearted converge in whimsical harmony.

In the spirit of statistical mirth and intellectual amusement, we assert that no further research in this area is needed. After all, some correlations are best left to humorously perplex the minds of curious academics and bring a touch of whimsy to the otherwise dour world of predictive modeling.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Actuarial Attraction: Analyzing the Quirky Correlation Between the Number of Actuaries in Kansas and Total Comments on LEMMiNO YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Correlations in Social Science Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Actuarial Attraction: Analyzing the Quirky Correlation Between the Number of Actuaries in Kansas and Total Comments on LEMMiNO YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Consortium for Mathematical Proclivities and Social Phenomena


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Actuarial Attraction: Analyzing the Quirky Correlation Between the Number of Actuaries in Kansas and Total Comments on LEMMiNO YouTube Videos with an abstract of This study delves into the unexpected and perplexing relationship between the number of actuaries in the state of Kansas and the total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Using data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9258534 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2022. The implications of this correlation are significant, raising questions about the potential influence of actuarial trends on online engagement with esoteric YouTube content. This paper aims to humorously unravel this improbable correlation and provoke contemplation on the intricate enigma of how apparently distinct phenomena may intertwine in unforeseen ways.

ChatGPT:

Actuarial, Attraction, Quirky Correlation, Number of Actuaries, Kansas, Total Comments, LEMMiNO, YouTube Videos, Correlation Coefficient, P-Value, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Online Engagement, Actuarial Trends, YouTube Content, Improbable Correlation, Unforeseen Ways

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of actuaries in Kansas
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of actuaries in Kansas
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of actuaries in Kansas

Total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9258534 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8572045 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of actuaries in Kansas) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.3E-5. 0.0000432582276534907100000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 0.0043% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 23,117 random variables You don't actually need 23 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.73, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of actuaries in Kansas (Actuaries)330450700670490400330430350340390
Total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos (Total comments)282748674932452038665418188988160113955103830840595681112521




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([330,450,700,670,490,400,330,430,350,340,390,])
array_2 = np.array([28274,86749,324520,386654,181889,88160,113955,103830,84059,56811,12521,])
array_1_name = "The number of actuaries in Kansas"
array_2_name = "Total comments on LEMMiNO YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 4292 · Black Variable ID: 8134 · Red Variable ID: 25602
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0