about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,137 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Dayton and the second variable is The divorce rate in Ohio.  The chart goes from 1999 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

When the air was murky, the spouses were in a haze, but as the skies cleared, so did their communication!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A scene from Skyrim ] A medieval city cloaked in a dense fog, couples struggling to communicate through the haze. As the smog dissipates, the clear skies over the city reveal improved relationships symbolized by intertwined hands and brighter, clearer expressions. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Dayton and The divorce rate in Ohio. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a meme a Polaroid photo Pop art Minimalism A scene from Skyrim
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Dayton and The divorce rate in Ohio, in the following situation: When the air was murky, the spouses were in a haze, but as the skies cleared, so did their communication!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: The city of Dayton is shrouded in a thick haze, with pollution hanging heavy in the air. Amidst the pollution, couples are seen in a fog, struggling to communicate. As the pollution clears, the skies over Ohio become brighter and clearer, symbolizing improved communication and clarity in relationships as the divorce rate declines.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: The city of Dayton is shrouded in a thick haze, with pollution hanging heavy in the air. Amidst the pollution, couples are seen in a fog, struggling to communicate. As the pollution clears, the skies over Ohio become brighter and clearer, symbolizing improved communication and clarity in relationships as the divorce rate declines. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A scene from Skyrim ] A medieval city cloaked in a dense fog, couples struggling to communicate through the haze. As the smog dissipates, the clear skies over the city reveal improved relationships symbolized by intertwined hands and brighter, clearer expressions.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Dayton caused The divorce rate in Ohio to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
When the Air Clears: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Divorce Rate in Ohio

The Journal of Ecological Sociology

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The divorce rate in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and CDC National Vital Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7839917 and p < 0.01 for 1999 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
When the Air Clears: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Divorce Rate in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study delves into the often overlooked connection between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7839917 and a p-value of < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2021. Our findings provide compelling evidence to suggest that the air we breathe may have a more profound impact on our personal relationships than previously assumed. The implications of this research extend beyond environmental concerns and force us to ponder just how far the ramifications of air pollution reach into our daily lives. This study is sure to clear the air on an unexpected link and may even leave you breathless with its revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The divorce rate in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
When the Air Clears: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Divorce Rate in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study delves into the often overlooked connection between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7839917 and a p-value of < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2021. Our findings provide compelling evidence to suggest that the air we breathe may have a more profound impact on our personal relationships than previously assumed. The implications of this research extend beyond environmental concerns and force us to ponder just how far the ramifications of air pollution reach into our daily lives. This study is sure to clear the air on an unexpected link and may even leave you breathless with its revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The air we breathe, often taken for granted, plays a critical role in our daily lives. As researchers, we are constantly seeking to uncover the multifaceted impacts of air pollution on human health and well-being. While the detrimental effects of air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular health have been well-documented, our study aims to explore a rather unconventional territory – the potential link between air pollution and the divorce rate. Yes, you read that right! We are venturing into uncharted academic terrain, where smog meets heartache and respirable particulate matter intersects with marital discord.

Ohio, known for its diverse urban landscapes and quaint rural vistas, provides the perfect backdrop for our investigation. The industrial heart of Dayton sets the stage for high levels of air pollutants, while the whimsical allure of Cincinnati, Cleveland, and Columbus adds complexity to our exploration. Our research takes a fresh approach to examining the potential interplay between air quality and interpersonal relationships. We raise the question: Could the gray blanket of pollution hanging over Dayton be casting a shadow over the state's marriage vows?

As we embark on this scholarly journey, we are aware of the skeptics and raised eyebrows that may greet our endeavor. However, empirical inquiry demands that we push the boundaries of conventional understanding and embrace the unexpected associations that may lurk beneath the surface. So, buckle up and prepare to be whisked away into a world where statistical correlations and romantic entanglements collide!

In this paper, we present our meticulous analysis of air quality data from the Environmental Protection Agency, alongside the divorce rate statistics from the CDC National Vital Statistics. Our aim is to shed light on a potential relationship that has hovered in the obscure periphery of scientific inquiry. Join us on this expedition as we unravel the enigmatic ties between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio. Let's embark on this adventure, and who knows – we might even find love in the hazy air!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The divorce rate in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
When the Air Clears: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Divorce Rate in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study delves into the often overlooked connection between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7839917 and a p-value of < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2021. Our findings provide compelling evidence to suggest that the air we breathe may have a more profound impact on our personal relationships than previously assumed. The implications of this research extend beyond environmental concerns and force us to ponder just how far the ramifications of air pollution reach into our daily lives. This study is sure to clear the air on an unexpected link and may even leave you breathless with its revelations.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The air we breathe, often taken for granted, plays a critical role in our daily lives. As researchers, we are constantly seeking to uncover the multifaceted impacts of air pollution on human health and well-being. While the detrimental effects of air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular health have been well-documented, our study aims to explore a rather unconventional territory – the potential link between air pollution and the divorce rate. Yes, you read that right! We are venturing into uncharted academic terrain, where smog meets heartache and respirable particulate matter intersects with marital discord.
Ohio, known for its diverse urban landscapes and quaint rural vistas, provides the perfect backdrop for our investigation. The industrial heart of Dayton sets the stage for high levels of air pollutants, while the whimsical allure of Cincinnati, Cleveland, and Columbus adds complexity to our exploration. Our research takes a fresh approach to examining the potential interplay between air quality and interpersonal relationships. We raise the question: Could the gray blanket of pollution hanging over Dayton be casting a shadow over the state's marriage vows?
As we embark on this scholarly journey, we are aware of the skeptics and raised eyebrows that may greet our endeavor. However, empirical inquiry demands that we push the boundaries of conventional understanding and embrace the unexpected associations that may lurk beneath the surface. So, buckle up and prepare to be whisked away into a world where statistical correlations and romantic entanglements collide!
In this paper, we present our meticulous analysis of air quality data from the Environmental Protection Agency, alongside the divorce rate statistics from the CDC National Vital Statistics. Our aim is to shed light on a potential relationship that has hovered in the obscure periphery of scientific inquiry. Join us on this expedition as we unravel the enigmatic ties between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio. Let's embark on this adventure, and who knows – we might even find love in the hazy air!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The study of the correlation between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio garners interest from a variety of disciplines, ranging from environmental science to social psychology. Smith et al. (2015) note that air pollution can have pervasive effects on physical health, with implications for mental well-being. Doe and Jones (2018) further illuminate the potential ripple effects of air pollution on community dynamics and interpersonal relationships. However, as we dig deeper into the literature, we must acknowledge the unexpected connections that may arise when seemingly disparate fields intersect.

Turning to non-fiction works, "The Economics of Love" by John Smithson and "The Psychology of Pollution" by Jane Doe provide valuable insights into the potential intertwining of environmental and relational factors. Both works offer thought-provoking perspectives, but as we venture into our investigation, it becomes evident that we must embrace a sense of whimsy and imagination to fully unravel the complexities at play.

On a more fictitious note, "Love in the Time of Smog" by Gabriel García Márquez and "A Tale of Two Inhalers" by Charles Dickens present allegorical musings on the human condition in the midst of environmental challenges. While not directly addressing our research topic, these literary gems serve as a reminder of the intricate dance between human emotions and the world around us.

Shifting our focus to pop culture influences, the animated series "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" and the beloved children's show "The Magic School Bus" inadvertently instill a sense of environmental awareness and stewardship in impressionable young minds. While these may seem far removed from our rigorous academic inquiry, their underlying messages of environmental interconnectedness and responsibility echo the central tenets of our investigation.

As we peruse these sources, we are reminded of the diverse tapestry of knowledge that informs our pursuit of understanding. While our exploration may tread upon unconventional terrain, it is essential to recognize the potential for revelations in unexpected places. The literature, both scholarly and imaginative, provides a rich backdrop against which we unravel the enigma of air pollution in Dayton and its impact on the divorce rate in Ohio.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The divorce rate in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and CDC National Vital Statistics . You used data from 1999 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
When the Air Clears: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Divorce Rate in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study delves into the often overlooked connection between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7839917 and a p-value of < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2021. Our findings provide compelling evidence to suggest that the air we breathe may have a more profound impact on our personal relationships than previously assumed. The implications of this research extend beyond environmental concerns and force us to ponder just how far the ramifications of air pollution reach into our daily lives. This study is sure to clear the air on an unexpected link and may even leave you breathless with its revelations.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The air we breathe, often taken for granted, plays a critical role in our daily lives. As researchers, we are constantly seeking to uncover the multifaceted impacts of air pollution on human health and well-being. While the detrimental effects of air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular health have been well-documented, our study aims to explore a rather unconventional territory – the potential link between air pollution and the divorce rate. Yes, you read that right! We are venturing into uncharted academic terrain, where smog meets heartache and respirable particulate matter intersects with marital discord.
Ohio, known for its diverse urban landscapes and quaint rural vistas, provides the perfect backdrop for our investigation. The industrial heart of Dayton sets the stage for high levels of air pollutants, while the whimsical allure of Cincinnati, Cleveland, and Columbus adds complexity to our exploration. Our research takes a fresh approach to examining the potential interplay between air quality and interpersonal relationships. We raise the question: Could the gray blanket of pollution hanging over Dayton be casting a shadow over the state's marriage vows?
As we embark on this scholarly journey, we are aware of the skeptics and raised eyebrows that may greet our endeavor. However, empirical inquiry demands that we push the boundaries of conventional understanding and embrace the unexpected associations that may lurk beneath the surface. So, buckle up and prepare to be whisked away into a world where statistical correlations and romantic entanglements collide!
In this paper, we present our meticulous analysis of air quality data from the Environmental Protection Agency, alongside the divorce rate statistics from the CDC National Vital Statistics. Our aim is to shed light on a potential relationship that has hovered in the obscure periphery of scientific inquiry. Join us on this expedition as we unravel the enigmatic ties between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio. Let's embark on this adventure, and who knows – we might even find love in the hazy air!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The journey to uncover the connection between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio began with an extensive collection of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the CDC National Vital Statistics. Our team scoured the depths of the internet, navigating through the virtual smog of information to extract the relevant air quality indices and divorce rate statistics. We must confess, it felt a bit like sifting through a sea of metaphorical pollutants to find the hidden gems of data, but our determination prevailed.

To quantify air pollution levels, we utilized a comprehensive range of air quality metrics including particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, and ozone concentrations. These metrics, much like the periodic elements, formed the atomic building blocks of our analysis, allowing us to paint a vivid portrait of the atmospheric conditions in Dayton over the years. The choice to focus on Dayton was deliberate – it serves as a microcosm of industrial and urban air pollution dynamics, representing a fertile ground for our investigation.

For divorce rate statistics, we delved into the CDC National Vital Statistics, extracting the number of divorces per capita in Ohio. Like detectives in an episode of forensic science, we sifted through mounds of vital statistics data, uncovering the intertwined stories of separation and dissolution within the state. It's safe to say we certainly had our hands full of divorce papers, albeit in the form of statistical summaries rather than legal documents.

With the data in hand, we ventured into the realm of statistical analysis, where we navigated through the dense fog of numbers using correlation coefficients, regression models, and hypothesis testing. The computational tools at our disposal were as reliable as a compass in a dense smog; they guided us through the statistical labyrinth and eventually led us to the threshold of revelatory findings.

Faced with a connection that seemed almost as unlikely as an indoor barbecue, we meticulously assessed the relationship between air pollution levels in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio. Our methods align with the most stringent standards of empirical research, ensuring that our analysis remained as clear and crisp as a breath of fresh air amidst the haze of statistical complexities.

In the following sections, we present the results of our investigation, illuminating the unexpected link between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio. Join us as we unveil the bond between atmospheric pollutants and marital discord, and navigate through the uncharted territories of environmental impacts on human relationships. This journey is bound to leave you feeling both enlightened and entertained, much like stumbling upon hidden treasure amidst the fog.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The divorce rate in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and CDC National Vital Statistics .

For the time period 1999 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7839917, r-squared of 0.6146430, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
When the Air Clears: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Divorce Rate in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study delves into the often overlooked connection between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7839917 and a p-value of < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2021. Our findings provide compelling evidence to suggest that the air we breathe may have a more profound impact on our personal relationships than previously assumed. The implications of this research extend beyond environmental concerns and force us to ponder just how far the ramifications of air pollution reach into our daily lives. This study is sure to clear the air on an unexpected link and may even leave you breathless with its revelations.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The air we breathe, often taken for granted, plays a critical role in our daily lives. As researchers, we are constantly seeking to uncover the multifaceted impacts of air pollution on human health and well-being. While the detrimental effects of air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular health have been well-documented, our study aims to explore a rather unconventional territory – the potential link between air pollution and the divorce rate. Yes, you read that right! We are venturing into uncharted academic terrain, where smog meets heartache and respirable particulate matter intersects with marital discord.
Ohio, known for its diverse urban landscapes and quaint rural vistas, provides the perfect backdrop for our investigation. The industrial heart of Dayton sets the stage for high levels of air pollutants, while the whimsical allure of Cincinnati, Cleveland, and Columbus adds complexity to our exploration. Our research takes a fresh approach to examining the potential interplay between air quality and interpersonal relationships. We raise the question: Could the gray blanket of pollution hanging over Dayton be casting a shadow over the state's marriage vows?
As we embark on this scholarly journey, we are aware of the skeptics and raised eyebrows that may greet our endeavor. However, empirical inquiry demands that we push the boundaries of conventional understanding and embrace the unexpected associations that may lurk beneath the surface. So, buckle up and prepare to be whisked away into a world where statistical correlations and romantic entanglements collide!
In this paper, we present our meticulous analysis of air quality data from the Environmental Protection Agency, alongside the divorce rate statistics from the CDC National Vital Statistics. Our aim is to shed light on a potential relationship that has hovered in the obscure periphery of scientific inquiry. Join us on this expedition as we unravel the enigmatic ties between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio. Let's embark on this adventure, and who knows – we might even find love in the hazy air!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio over the period of 1999 to 2021, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7839917 and an R-squared value of 0.6146430. This substantial correlation suggests that as air pollution levels increased, so did the divorce rate in Ohio. It seems the air in Dayton not only affects respiratory systems but also has a hand in matters of the heart.

To visually represent this intriguing relationship, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot demonstrating the strong correlation between air pollution and divorce rates. The scatter of data points paints a compelling picture, showing that as air pollution levels rise, so do the divorce rates. It's as if the smog in Dayton is whispering not-so-sweet nothings into the ears of Ohio couples, causing them to part ways.

The statistical significance of our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, further bolsters the credibility of this unexpected association. It appears that the air pollution in Dayton may have been a silent partner in contributing to the dissolution of marriages across Ohio. Who would have thought that the murky haze hovering over a city could have such far-reaching implications for relationships?

These results not only shed light on the understudied impact of air pollution on interpersonal dynamics but also spark a host of questions about the broader societal effects of environmental quality. Our findings leave us pondering the hidden influences of our surroundings and the unexpected ways in which they intertwine with our personal lives. The air we breathe may hold more sway over our relationships than we ever imagined.

In conclusion, our research has unearthed a remarkable association between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio. Whether it’s the soot in the air or the heavy hearts of couples, there's a tangible link that cannot be overlooked. This study challenges us to consider the multifaceted reach of environmental factors and their potential impact on aspects of human life that extend beyond the physical. As we clear the air surrounding this improbable connection, we invite further exploration into the intricate interplay between environmental conditions and social phenomena. After all, who knows what other surprising relationships might be hidden in the data?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The divorce rate in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
When the Air Clears: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Divorce Rate in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study delves into the often overlooked connection between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7839917 and a p-value of < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2021. Our findings provide compelling evidence to suggest that the air we breathe may have a more profound impact on our personal relationships than previously assumed. The implications of this research extend beyond environmental concerns and force us to ponder just how far the ramifications of air pollution reach into our daily lives. This study is sure to clear the air on an unexpected link and may even leave you breathless with its revelations.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of the correlation between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio garners interest from a variety of disciplines, ranging from environmental science to social psychology. Smith et al. (2015) note that air pollution can have pervasive effects on physical health, with implications for mental well-being. Doe and Jones (2018) further illuminate the potential ripple effects of air pollution on community dynamics and interpersonal relationships. However, as we dig deeper into the literature, we must acknowledge the unexpected connections that may arise when seemingly disparate fields intersect.
Turning to non-fiction works, "The Economics of Love" by John Smithson and "The Psychology of Pollution" by Jane Doe provide valuable insights into the potential intertwining of environmental and relational factors. Both works offer thought-provoking perspectives, but as we venture into our investigation, it becomes evident that we must embrace a sense of whimsy and imagination to fully unravel the complexities at play.
On a more fictitious note, "Love in the Time of Smog" by Gabriel García Márquez and "A Tale of Two Inhalers" by Charles Dickens present allegorical musings on the human condition in the midst of environmental challenges. While not directly addressing our research topic, these literary gems serve as a reminder of the intricate dance between human emotions and the world around us.
Shifting our focus to pop culture influences, the animated series "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" and the beloved children's show "The Magic School Bus" inadvertently instill a sense of environmental awareness and stewardship in impressionable young minds. While these may seem far removed from our rigorous academic inquiry, their underlying messages of environmental interconnectedness and responsibility echo the central tenets of our investigation.
As we peruse these sources, we are reminded of the diverse tapestry of knowledge that informs our pursuit of understanding. While our exploration may tread upon unconventional terrain, it is essential to recognize the potential for revelations in unexpected places. The literature, both scholarly and imaginative, provides a rich backdrop against which we unravel the enigma of air pollution in Dayton and its impact on the divorce rate in Ohio.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio over the period of 1999 to 2021, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7839917 and an R-squared value of 0.6146430. This substantial correlation suggests that as air pollution levels increased, so did the divorce rate in Ohio. It seems the air in Dayton not only affects respiratory systems but also has a hand in matters of the heart.
To visually represent this intriguing relationship, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot demonstrating the strong correlation between air pollution and divorce rates. The scatter of data points paints a compelling picture, showing that as air pollution levels rise, so do the divorce rates. It's as if the smog in Dayton is whispering not-so-sweet nothings into the ears of Ohio couples, causing them to part ways.
The statistical significance of our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, further bolsters the credibility of this unexpected association. It appears that the air pollution in Dayton may have been a silent partner in contributing to the dissolution of marriages across Ohio. Who would have thought that the murky haze hovering over a city could have such far-reaching implications for relationships?
These results not only shed light on the understudied impact of air pollution on interpersonal dynamics but also spark a host of questions about the broader societal effects of environmental quality. Our findings leave us pondering the hidden influences of our surroundings and the unexpected ways in which they intertwine with our personal lives. The air we breathe may hold more sway over our relationships than we ever imagined.
In conclusion, our research has unearthed a remarkable association between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio. Whether it’s the soot in the air or the heavy hearts of couples, there's a tangible link that cannot be overlooked. This study challenges us to consider the multifaceted reach of environmental factors and their potential impact on aspects of human life that extend beyond the physical. As we clear the air surrounding this improbable connection, we invite further exploration into the intricate interplay between environmental conditions and social phenomena. After all, who knows what other surprising relationships might be hidden in the data?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The significant positive correlation between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio uncovered in this study adds a fascinating layer to the complex web of environmental and socio-relational interplay. Our findings align with previous research by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018), which emphasized the pervasive impact of air pollution on mental well-being and community dynamics, respectively. It appears that the detrimental effects of air pollution extend beyond respiratory health and spill over into the relational domain, contributing to increased tensions within marital relationships. We must acknowledge that our research not only buttresses these scholarly works but also evokes the unexpected connections highlighted in our literature review.

As we delved into the unconventional sources cited in our literature review, the playful commentary underscored the aptitude for discovery in unforeseen places. The whimsical non-fiction works of Smithson and Doe, the timeless allegorical musings of García Márquez and Dickens, and the environmental stewardship undercurrent in children's programming all served as reminders of the myriad influences that shape our understanding of human-environment dynamics. In a similar vein, our discovery of a substantial correlation between air pollution and divorce rates amidst the industrial backdrop of Dayton unearths a surprising facet of this intricate relationship.

The statistical robustness of our findings, represented by the significant correlation coefficient and p-value, lends credibility to the compelling hypothesis that air pollution in Dayton may have more profound implications for Ohio couples than previously realized. This unexpected association challenges us to contemplate the far-reaching ramifications of environmental quality and its potential influence on our personal lives. Our study not only fosters a deeper appreciation for the complexity of environmental factors but also nudges us to consider the broader societal impact of air pollution.

In light of these findings, it is imperative to contemplate the nuanced implications of environmental conditions on interpersonal dynamics and relational well-being. The "silent partner" role that air pollution in Dayton seems to play in contributing to marital dissolution prompts a reconsideration of the invisible influences that shape our daily lives. As we unpack the implications of our research, we are buoyed by the sentiment that this unexpected relationship might just be the tip of the iceberg. After all, who could have guessed that the murky haze of an industrial city could hold such sway over matters of the heart?

Our study beckons further exploration into the enigmatic nexus between environmental conditions and interpersonal relationships. As we clear the air on this improbable connection, we cannot help but wonder what other surprising linkages might lay obscured within the data. The intertwining of environmental and relational factors beckons us to adopt a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted influences that shape our lives. So, let's embrace the unexpected and breathe in the possibility that there is much more than meets the eye in the air we breathe.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The divorce rate in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
When the Air Clears: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Divorce Rate in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study delves into the often overlooked connection between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7839917 and a p-value of < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2021. Our findings provide compelling evidence to suggest that the air we breathe may have a more profound impact on our personal relationships than previously assumed. The implications of this research extend beyond environmental concerns and force us to ponder just how far the ramifications of air pollution reach into our daily lives. This study is sure to clear the air on an unexpected link and may even leave you breathless with its revelations.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The air we breathe, often taken for granted, plays a critical role in our daily lives. As researchers, we are constantly seeking to uncover the multifaceted impacts of air pollution on human health and well-being. While the detrimental effects of air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular health have been well-documented, our study aims to explore a rather unconventional territory – the potential link between air pollution and the divorce rate. Yes, you read that right! We are venturing into uncharted academic terrain, where smog meets heartache and respirable particulate matter intersects with marital discord.
Ohio, known for its diverse urban landscapes and quaint rural vistas, provides the perfect backdrop for our investigation. The industrial heart of Dayton sets the stage for high levels of air pollutants, while the whimsical allure of Cincinnati, Cleveland, and Columbus adds complexity to our exploration. Our research takes a fresh approach to examining the potential interplay between air quality and interpersonal relationships. We raise the question: Could the gray blanket of pollution hanging over Dayton be casting a shadow over the state's marriage vows?
As we embark on this scholarly journey, we are aware of the skeptics and raised eyebrows that may greet our endeavor. However, empirical inquiry demands that we push the boundaries of conventional understanding and embrace the unexpected associations that may lurk beneath the surface. So, buckle up and prepare to be whisked away into a world where statistical correlations and romantic entanglements collide!
In this paper, we present our meticulous analysis of air quality data from the Environmental Protection Agency, alongside the divorce rate statistics from the CDC National Vital Statistics. Our aim is to shed light on a potential relationship that has hovered in the obscure periphery of scientific inquiry. Join us on this expedition as we unravel the enigmatic ties between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio. Let's embark on this adventure, and who knows – we might even find love in the hazy air!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio over the period of 1999 to 2021, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7839917 and an R-squared value of 0.6146430. This substantial correlation suggests that as air pollution levels increased, so did the divorce rate in Ohio. It seems the air in Dayton not only affects respiratory systems but also has a hand in matters of the heart.
To visually represent this intriguing relationship, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot demonstrating the strong correlation between air pollution and divorce rates. The scatter of data points paints a compelling picture, showing that as air pollution levels rise, so do the divorce rates. It's as if the smog in Dayton is whispering not-so-sweet nothings into the ears of Ohio couples, causing them to part ways.
The statistical significance of our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, further bolsters the credibility of this unexpected association. It appears that the air pollution in Dayton may have been a silent partner in contributing to the dissolution of marriages across Ohio. Who would have thought that the murky haze hovering over a city could have such far-reaching implications for relationships?
These results not only shed light on the understudied impact of air pollution on interpersonal dynamics but also spark a host of questions about the broader societal effects of environmental quality. Our findings leave us pondering the hidden influences of our surroundings and the unexpected ways in which they intertwine with our personal lives. The air we breathe may hold more sway over our relationships than we ever imagined.
In conclusion, our research has unearthed a remarkable association between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio. Whether it’s the soot in the air or the heavy hearts of couples, there's a tangible link that cannot be overlooked. This study challenges us to consider the multifaceted reach of environmental factors and their potential impact on aspects of human life that extend beyond the physical. As we clear the air surrounding this improbable connection, we invite further exploration into the intricate interplay between environmental conditions and social phenomena. After all, who knows what other surprising relationships might be hidden in the data?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In closing, our study has unveiled an unexpected relationship between the air we breathe and the bonds we make, or break, in the state of Ohio. Who would have thought that the particulate matter wafting through Dayton's skies could have such profound implications for matters of the heart? As we navigate this uncharted territory, it's clear that the air we breathe may be doing more than just clogging our lungs – it may also be clouding our judgment in matters of love and commitment. Our findings compel us to consider the broader implications of air pollution on our social fabric, reminding us that the impact of environmental factors stretches far beyond the physical realm. Perhaps it's time to add a new dimension to the age-old saying "love is in the air" - as our research suggests, so is heartache.

It is worth noting that while our study brings attention to this unexpected link, there are, of course, limitations. The complexities of human relationships cannot be neatly encapsulated in statistical analyses, and there may be a multitude of confounding variables at play. Despite these limitations, the robustness of our findings calls for further exploration and consideration. Perhaps it's time for us to take a long, hard look at the air we breathe and realize that it may be influencing our lives in ways we never anticipated.

In the spirit of full transparency, it's important to acknowledge that our study is just the tip of the iceberg, or perhaps in this case, the tip of the smog. As we wrap up this investigation, we dare say that the findings point to a breath of fresh air in the field of environmental research, revealing a relationship that may have been lingering in the background, obscured by the haze of inattention.

In sum, the evidence presented here irrefutably proves the existence of a significant link between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio. Our hope is that this study sparks further inquisitiveness and exploration, uncovering more unexpected connections hidden within the labyrinth of data. And with that, we confidently declare: the air has been cleared, and no further research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited When the Air Clears: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Divorce Rate in Ohio. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Sociology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited When the Air Clears: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Divorce Rate in Ohio. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Environmental and Socio-Demographic Analysis (SESDA)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled When the Air Clears: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Divorce Rate in Ohio with an abstract of This groundbreaking study delves into the often overlooked connection between air pollution in Dayton and the divorce rate in Ohio. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7839917 and a p-value of < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2021. Our findings provide compelling evidence to suggest that the air we breathe may have a more profound impact on our personal relationships than previously assumed. The implications of this research extend beyond environmental concerns and force us to ponder just how far the ramifications of air pollution reach into our daily lives. This study is sure to clear the air on an unexpected link and may even leave you breathless with its revelations.

ChatGPT:

Dayton air pollution, divorce rate Ohio, air pollution impact on relationships, environmental effects on divorce, air pollution correlation divorce, Dayton pollution and marriage, air quality marriage Ohio, impact of pollution on personal relationships

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Dayton
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Dayton, OH
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Dayton

The divorce rate in Ohio
Source: CDC National Vital Statistics
See what else correlates with The divorce rate in Ohio

Correlation r = 0.7839917 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6146430 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 61.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The divorce rate in Ohio) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Dayton) over the 23 years from 1999 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.6E-6. 0.0000095881345204743630000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.78 in 0.00096% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 104,296 random variables You don't actually need 104 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.55, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air pollution in Dayton (Bad air quality days)72.328875.683170.13767.123367.123336.885245.205535.890440.27454.91838.082263.561654.520557.103851.506947.397336.712332.786929.58940.27441.643833.606637.8082
The divorce rate in Ohio (Divorce rate)3.94.2443.73.63.53.53.43.33.33.43.43.43.294843.174793.071363.029872.922652.905962.768732.472892.62012




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([72.3288,75.6831,70.137,67.1233,67.1233,36.8852,45.2055,35.8904,40.274,54.918,38.0822,63.5616,54.5205,57.1038,51.5069,47.3973,36.7123,32.7869,29.589,40.274,41.6438,33.6066,37.8082,])
array_2 = np.array([3.9,4.2,4,4,3.7,3.6,3.5,3.5,3.4,3.3,3.3,3.4,3.4,3.4,3.29484,3.17479,3.07136,3.02987,2.92265,2.90596,2.76873,2.47289,2.62012,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Dayton"
array_2_name = "The divorce rate in Ohio"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 4137 · Black Variable ID: 20525 · Red Variable ID: 19816
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0