about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,133 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Huntsville and the second variable is Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale.  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the air cleared up, people no longer felt the need to stay indoors and watch TV. It seems like the smog was the only thing keeping them glued to their screens, talk about a smoggy show!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration depicting an urban scene in Huntsville. The streets are filled with people enjoying the clear air and blue skies. Use muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern reminiscent of the 1960s. The illustration should capture the contrast between the previously smog-filled environment and the current clean air, portraying the palpable sense of liberation as people embrace the outdoors once more. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Huntsville and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Low poly Magic realism A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s inspired by bauhaus Surrealism
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Huntsville and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale, in the following situation: As the air cleared up, people no longer felt the need to stay indoors and watch TV. It seems like the smog was the only thing keeping them glued to their screens, talk about a smoggy show!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: As the smog cleared up in Huntsville, the streets were filled with people out and about. With clear air and blue skies, no one was staying indoors. The television screens sat sadly silent, as the American Idol Season Finale viewership count plummeted without the smoggy allure.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: As the smog cleared up in Huntsville, the streets were filled with people out and about. With clear air and blue skies, no one was staying indoors. The television screens sat sadly silent, as the American Idol Season Finale viewership count plummeted without the smoggy allure. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a comic-book-style illustration depicting an urban scene in Huntsville. The streets are filled with people enjoying the clear air and blue skies. Use muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern reminiscent of the 1960s. The illustration should capture the contrast between the previously smog-filled environment and the current clean air, portraying the palpable sense of liberation as people embrace the outdoors once more.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Huntsville caused Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Huntsville Hustle: Air Pollution and American Idol Season Finale Viewership Scale

The Journal of Eccentric Environmental Economics

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Huntsville and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8137815 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Huntsville Hustle: Air Pollution and American Idol Season Finale Viewership Scale

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to connect the smoggy dots between air pollution in Huntsville and viewership of the American Idol season finale. With a blend of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and a sprinkle of statistics from Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8137815 and a p-value lower than the limbo stick at a beach party for the years 2002 to 2022. These findings suggest that as the air pollution levels rise in Huntsville, so does the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. We delve into the comical correlation, conjuring up puns about smog, tunes, and TV ratings, while offering a whimsical yet statistically significant explanation for this unexpected environmental-entertainment connection. This paper promises to leave the reader both informed and entertained – just like an American Idol finale.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Huntsville and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Huntsville Hustle: Air Pollution and American Idol Season Finale Viewership Scale

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to connect the smoggy dots between air pollution in Huntsville and viewership of the American Idol season finale. With a blend of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and a sprinkle of statistics from Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8137815 and a p-value lower than the limbo stick at a beach party for the years 2002 to 2022. These findings suggest that as the air pollution levels rise in Huntsville, so does the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. We delve into the comical correlation, conjuring up puns about smog, tunes, and TV ratings, while offering a whimsical yet statistically significant explanation for this unexpected environmental-entertainment connection. This paper promises to leave the reader both informed and entertained – just like an American Idol finale.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introducing the Huntsville Hustle: Air Pollution and American Idol Season Finale Viewership Scale

Ladies and gentlemen, prepare to be whisked away on a whimsical whirlwind of wacky research! In this paper, we delve into the comical correlation between the seemingly unrelated realms of air pollution in Huntsville and the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. Strap on your science hats and grab your remote controls, because we're about to embark on a statistical journey that's as captivating as a dramatic Idol performance, with a sprinkle of p-values and a dash of data to keep you on the edge of your seats.

Picture this: A city shrouded in smog, citizens donning their finest face masks like extras in a dystopian film, and yet, nestled within this cloud of pollutants, a peculiar phenomenon emerges. Yes, that's right – we're talking about the riveting rise of American Idol viewership that seems to parallel the increase in air pollution levels. It's like the pollution particles are harmonizing with the TV signals, creating a duet of statistical significance and pop culture. Who would have thought that the correlation coefficient and TV ratings could dance together so harmoniously?

Now, let's not jump to conclusions just yet. Before we embark on this hilarious, yet surprisingly informative journey, let us first lay the groundwork for our study, unpacking the theoretical underpinnings and diving headfirst into the statistical soup. We'll serve up a hearty portion of explanatory variables and a unique blend of data sources to spice up our analysis. Trust us when we say that this is not your average, run-of-the-mill research paper – we've got the statistical chops and the comedic quips to keep you entertained from the abstract to the conclusion.

So, grab a seat and get ready to be tickled pink by the unexpected connections we're about to unravel. As we embark on this research odyssey, you can rest assured that we won't just be examining air pollution and television viewership – we'll also be sprinkling in our findings with puns so sharp, you'll find yourself chuckling like a lab scientist who just discovered a new element on the periodic table. As we unravel this tale of smog, songs, and statistical significance, get ready to have your curiosity piqued and your funny bone tickled. After all, who said research can't be both informative and downright hilarious?

So, without further ado, let's dive into the Huntsville Hustle – a study that promises to leave you both informed and entertained, like an American Idol finale with a side of statistical seasoning!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Huntsville and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Huntsville Hustle: Air Pollution and American Idol Season Finale Viewership Scale

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to connect the smoggy dots between air pollution in Huntsville and viewership of the American Idol season finale. With a blend of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and a sprinkle of statistics from Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8137815 and a p-value lower than the limbo stick at a beach party for the years 2002 to 2022. These findings suggest that as the air pollution levels rise in Huntsville, so does the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. We delve into the comical correlation, conjuring up puns about smog, tunes, and TV ratings, while offering a whimsical yet statistically significant explanation for this unexpected environmental-entertainment connection. This paper promises to leave the reader both informed and entertained – just like an American Idol finale.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introducing the Huntsville Hustle: Air Pollution and American Idol Season Finale Viewership Scale
Ladies and gentlemen, prepare to be whisked away on a whimsical whirlwind of wacky research! In this paper, we delve into the comical correlation between the seemingly unrelated realms of air pollution in Huntsville and the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. Strap on your science hats and grab your remote controls, because we're about to embark on a statistical journey that's as captivating as a dramatic Idol performance, with a sprinkle of p-values and a dash of data to keep you on the edge of your seats.
Picture this: A city shrouded in smog, citizens donning their finest face masks like extras in a dystopian film, and yet, nestled within this cloud of pollutants, a peculiar phenomenon emerges. Yes, that's right – we're talking about the riveting rise of American Idol viewership that seems to parallel the increase in air pollution levels. It's like the pollution particles are harmonizing with the TV signals, creating a duet of statistical significance and pop culture. Who would have thought that the correlation coefficient and TV ratings could dance together so harmoniously?
Now, let's not jump to conclusions just yet. Before we embark on this hilarious, yet surprisingly informative journey, let us first lay the groundwork for our study, unpacking the theoretical underpinnings and diving headfirst into the statistical soup. We'll serve up a hearty portion of explanatory variables and a unique blend of data sources to spice up our analysis. Trust us when we say that this is not your average, run-of-the-mill research paper – we've got the statistical chops and the comedic quips to keep you entertained from the abstract to the conclusion.
So, grab a seat and get ready to be tickled pink by the unexpected connections we're about to unravel. As we embark on this research odyssey, you can rest assured that we won't just be examining air pollution and television viewership – we'll also be sprinkling in our findings with puns so sharp, you'll find yourself chuckling like a lab scientist who just discovered a new element on the periodic table. As we unravel this tale of smog, songs, and statistical significance, get ready to have your curiosity piqued and your funny bone tickled. After all, who said research can't be both informative and downright hilarious?
So, without further ado, let's dive into the Huntsville Hustle – a study that promises to leave you both informed and entertained, like an American Idol finale with a side of statistical seasoning!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The role of air pollution in influencing various aspects of human life has been the subject of extensive research. Smith (2010) elucidates the detrimental effects of air pollution on respiratory health, while Doe (2015) examines its impact on climate change. Conversely, Jones (2018) delves into the economic repercussions of air pollution on local communities. However, none of these studies could have anticipated the quirky connection we are about to explore between the smoggy skies of Huntsville and the glitzy lights of the American Idol season finale.

As we venture deeper into this unexpected correlation, let us not forget the plethora of non-fiction works that have delved into the complexities of urban air pollution. "The Air We Breathe: A Quest for Clean Air and Solutions for Our Polluted Cities" by John Smith sheds light on the intricacies of combating air pollution, providing a serious backdrop to our seemingly ludicrous venture. In a similar vein, "Pollution and People: A Comprehensive Analysis" by Jane Doe resonates with the gravity of the issue at hand, before we take a comedic swerve into the realm of unexpected correlations.

Taking an unconventional turn, let's not discount the potential impact of fiction on our research. Could it be that the works of fiction have, in some way, foretold the peculiar link between air pollution and television viewership? Consider "The Smog of Huntsville" by Arthur Conan Doyle – a fictional piece that eerily mirrors our investigation, although perhaps with a more sinister twist. Furthermore, the dystopian masterpiece "American Idol Apocalypse" by George Orwell explores a world where reality TV and environmental degradation collide, offering an alternate reality where our findings could be considered absolutely normal.

In a surprising twist, our journey into the literature would be remiss without acknowledging the role of social media in shaping public opinion and shedding light on unconventional connections. Recent Twitter discussions have captured the public's bewilderment at the intersection of contaminated air and televised entertainment, with posts such as, "Does smog make Idol ratings soar? #PollutionPuzzles" and "Breathing in smog while cheering for Idol, what a time to be alive! #HuntsvilleHilarity." These seemingly innocuous tweets hint at the underlying curiosity and amusement that the Huntsville Hustle has sparked in the digital sphere.

In conclusion, while scholarly research has historically focused on the direct and tangible impacts of air pollution, our foray into the unexpected connection between air pollution in Huntsville and viewership of the American Idol season finale invites a breath of fresh air into the realm of environmental studies. With a dash of humor and a sprinkle of statistical significance, our findings promise to not only broaden the scope of air pollution research but also induce a few chuckles along the way. As we eagerly proceed with our analysis, let us remember that sometimes the most peculiar connections can lead to the most intriguing discoveries – and perhaps a good laugh or two.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Huntsville and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Huntsville Hustle: Air Pollution and American Idol Season Finale Viewership Scale

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to connect the smoggy dots between air pollution in Huntsville and viewership of the American Idol season finale. With a blend of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and a sprinkle of statistics from Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8137815 and a p-value lower than the limbo stick at a beach party for the years 2002 to 2022. These findings suggest that as the air pollution levels rise in Huntsville, so does the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. We delve into the comical correlation, conjuring up puns about smog, tunes, and TV ratings, while offering a whimsical yet statistically significant explanation for this unexpected environmental-entertainment connection. This paper promises to leave the reader both informed and entertained – just like an American Idol finale.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introducing the Huntsville Hustle: Air Pollution and American Idol Season Finale Viewership Scale
Ladies and gentlemen, prepare to be whisked away on a whimsical whirlwind of wacky research! In this paper, we delve into the comical correlation between the seemingly unrelated realms of air pollution in Huntsville and the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. Strap on your science hats and grab your remote controls, because we're about to embark on a statistical journey that's as captivating as a dramatic Idol performance, with a sprinkle of p-values and a dash of data to keep you on the edge of your seats.
Picture this: A city shrouded in smog, citizens donning their finest face masks like extras in a dystopian film, and yet, nestled within this cloud of pollutants, a peculiar phenomenon emerges. Yes, that's right – we're talking about the riveting rise of American Idol viewership that seems to parallel the increase in air pollution levels. It's like the pollution particles are harmonizing with the TV signals, creating a duet of statistical significance and pop culture. Who would have thought that the correlation coefficient and TV ratings could dance together so harmoniously?
Now, let's not jump to conclusions just yet. Before we embark on this hilarious, yet surprisingly informative journey, let us first lay the groundwork for our study, unpacking the theoretical underpinnings and diving headfirst into the statistical soup. We'll serve up a hearty portion of explanatory variables and a unique blend of data sources to spice up our analysis. Trust us when we say that this is not your average, run-of-the-mill research paper – we've got the statistical chops and the comedic quips to keep you entertained from the abstract to the conclusion.
So, grab a seat and get ready to be tickled pink by the unexpected connections we're about to unravel. As we embark on this research odyssey, you can rest assured that we won't just be examining air pollution and television viewership – we'll also be sprinkling in our findings with puns so sharp, you'll find yourself chuckling like a lab scientist who just discovered a new element on the periodic table. As we unravel this tale of smog, songs, and statistical significance, get ready to have your curiosity piqued and your funny bone tickled. After all, who said research can't be both informative and downright hilarious?
So, without further ado, let's dive into the Huntsville Hustle – a study that promises to leave you both informed and entertained, like an American Idol finale with a side of statistical seasoning!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic entwining of air pollution and American Idol viewership, our research team engaged in a delightful dance of data collection and statistical analysis. Picture us donning our research hats and waltzing through a metaphorical maze of numbers, charts, and yes, a few side-splitting statistical puns.

First, we pirouetted through the digital halls of the internet, twirling through the Environmental Protection Agency's troves of air quality data from the Huntsville region. The guffaw-inducing game of data collection involved extracting air pollution measurements, from ozone to particulate matter, to create a symphony of pollution levels over the years. Next, we moseyed on over to Wikipedia, where we scooped up the viewership count of the American Idol season finales from 2002 to 2022, creating a colorful canvas of TV ratings that would make Andy Warhol proud.

Now, here's where the magic happened – we unleashed our statistical prowess and whipped up a mean regression analysis that would make Newton himself raise an eyebrow. By juggling the air pollution data as the independent variable and the American Idol viewership as the dependent variable, we cracked open the statistical cauldron and conjured up correlation coefficients and p-values that bore more significance than a Mystery Science Theater marathon.

Of course, we couldn't resist sprinkling in a few punderful moments throughout our methodology like a master chef garnishing a culinary masterpiece. We promised to keep our analysis as light-hearted as the helium in a comedy club balloon and as impactful as a precision-engineered whoopee cushion.

In the end, our methodology may have been as unconventional as a stand-up comedian at a physics convention, but the results were as clear as a satisfying punchline – there exists a statistically significant relationship between air pollution in Huntsville and the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. So, sit back, relax, and get ready to chuckle your way through our data-driven escapade - it's a methodology section unlike any other!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Huntsville and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8137815, r-squared of 0.6622403, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Huntsville Hustle: Air Pollution and American Idol Season Finale Viewership Scale

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to connect the smoggy dots between air pollution in Huntsville and viewership of the American Idol season finale. With a blend of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and a sprinkle of statistics from Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8137815 and a p-value lower than the limbo stick at a beach party for the years 2002 to 2022. These findings suggest that as the air pollution levels rise in Huntsville, so does the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. We delve into the comical correlation, conjuring up puns about smog, tunes, and TV ratings, while offering a whimsical yet statistically significant explanation for this unexpected environmental-entertainment connection. This paper promises to leave the reader both informed and entertained – just like an American Idol finale.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introducing the Huntsville Hustle: Air Pollution and American Idol Season Finale Viewership Scale
Ladies and gentlemen, prepare to be whisked away on a whimsical whirlwind of wacky research! In this paper, we delve into the comical correlation between the seemingly unrelated realms of air pollution in Huntsville and the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. Strap on your science hats and grab your remote controls, because we're about to embark on a statistical journey that's as captivating as a dramatic Idol performance, with a sprinkle of p-values and a dash of data to keep you on the edge of your seats.
Picture this: A city shrouded in smog, citizens donning their finest face masks like extras in a dystopian film, and yet, nestled within this cloud of pollutants, a peculiar phenomenon emerges. Yes, that's right – we're talking about the riveting rise of American Idol viewership that seems to parallel the increase in air pollution levels. It's like the pollution particles are harmonizing with the TV signals, creating a duet of statistical significance and pop culture. Who would have thought that the correlation coefficient and TV ratings could dance together so harmoniously?
Now, let's not jump to conclusions just yet. Before we embark on this hilarious, yet surprisingly informative journey, let us first lay the groundwork for our study, unpacking the theoretical underpinnings and diving headfirst into the statistical soup. We'll serve up a hearty portion of explanatory variables and a unique blend of data sources to spice up our analysis. Trust us when we say that this is not your average, run-of-the-mill research paper – we've got the statistical chops and the comedic quips to keep you entertained from the abstract to the conclusion.
So, grab a seat and get ready to be tickled pink by the unexpected connections we're about to unravel. As we embark on this research odyssey, you can rest assured that we won't just be examining air pollution and television viewership – we'll also be sprinkling in our findings with puns so sharp, you'll find yourself chuckling like a lab scientist who just discovered a new element on the periodic table. As we unravel this tale of smog, songs, and statistical significance, get ready to have your curiosity piqued and your funny bone tickled. After all, who said research can't be both informative and downright hilarious?
So, without further ado, let's dive into the Huntsville Hustle – a study that promises to leave you both informed and entertained, like an American Idol finale with a side of statistical seasoning!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

After a thorough and whimsical analysis of the data, the results of our study revealed a striking connection between air pollution in Huntsville and the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. The correlation coefficient of 0.8137815 between these seemingly unrelated variables was as surprising and unexpected as a plot twist in a reality TV show. It's as if the smog and the song's high notes were in perfect harmony, creating a statistical symphony that had us dancing in our lab coats.

The r-squared value of 0.6622403 further emphasized the robustness of this correlation, demonstrating that approximately 66.2% of the variability in the viewership count of the American Idol season finale can be explained by the fluctuations in air pollution levels in Huntsville. It's almost as if the viewers were tuning in not just for the melodious performances but also for the tantalizing tease of air quality data – who would've thought smog could be so mesmerizing?

With a p-value that is lower than the elevator music at a department store, coming in at p < 0.01, our findings provide robust evidence that this correlation is not just a statistical fluke but a true relationship worthy of our attention. You could say the evidence for this correlation is as strong as a Broadway actor's stage presence.

To visually encapsulate the intriguing relationship uncovered by our analysis, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that beautifully illustrates the strong positive correlation between air pollution in Huntsville and the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. The data points create a pattern as striking as a contestant's high note, solidifying the veracity of our findings and sparking joy in the hearts of both science enthusiasts and reality TV aficionados alike.

In summary, our research has shone a comical yet statistically significant spotlight on the unexpected connection between air pollution in Huntsville and the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. As we wrap up this section, we can't help but marvel at the whimsical tale of smog, songs, and statistical significance that has unfolded before our eyes – it's like a statistical rollercoaster ride through the avenues of entertainment and environmental data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Huntsville and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Huntsville Hustle: Air Pollution and American Idol Season Finale Viewership Scale

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to connect the smoggy dots between air pollution in Huntsville and viewership of the American Idol season finale. With a blend of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and a sprinkle of statistics from Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8137815 and a p-value lower than the limbo stick at a beach party for the years 2002 to 2022. These findings suggest that as the air pollution levels rise in Huntsville, so does the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. We delve into the comical correlation, conjuring up puns about smog, tunes, and TV ratings, while offering a whimsical yet statistically significant explanation for this unexpected environmental-entertainment connection. This paper promises to leave the reader both informed and entertained – just like an American Idol finale.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The role of air pollution in influencing various aspects of human life has been the subject of extensive research. Smith (2010) elucidates the detrimental effects of air pollution on respiratory health, while Doe (2015) examines its impact on climate change. Conversely, Jones (2018) delves into the economic repercussions of air pollution on local communities. However, none of these studies could have anticipated the quirky connection we are about to explore between the smoggy skies of Huntsville and the glitzy lights of the American Idol season finale.
As we venture deeper into this unexpected correlation, let us not forget the plethora of non-fiction works that have delved into the complexities of urban air pollution. "The Air We Breathe: A Quest for Clean Air and Solutions for Our Polluted Cities" by John Smith sheds light on the intricacies of combating air pollution, providing a serious backdrop to our seemingly ludicrous venture. In a similar vein, "Pollution and People: A Comprehensive Analysis" by Jane Doe resonates with the gravity of the issue at hand, before we take a comedic swerve into the realm of unexpected correlations.
Taking an unconventional turn, let's not discount the potential impact of fiction on our research. Could it be that the works of fiction have, in some way, foretold the peculiar link between air pollution and television viewership? Consider "The Smog of Huntsville" by Arthur Conan Doyle – a fictional piece that eerily mirrors our investigation, although perhaps with a more sinister twist. Furthermore, the dystopian masterpiece "American Idol Apocalypse" by George Orwell explores a world where reality TV and environmental degradation collide, offering an alternate reality where our findings could be considered absolutely normal.
In a surprising twist, our journey into the literature would be remiss without acknowledging the role of social media in shaping public opinion and shedding light on unconventional connections. Recent Twitter discussions have captured the public's bewilderment at the intersection of contaminated air and televised entertainment, with posts such as, "Does smog make Idol ratings soar? #PollutionPuzzles" and "Breathing in smog while cheering for Idol, what a time to be alive! #HuntsvilleHilarity." These seemingly innocuous tweets hint at the underlying curiosity and amusement that the Huntsville Hustle has sparked in the digital sphere.
In conclusion, while scholarly research has historically focused on the direct and tangible impacts of air pollution, our foray into the unexpected connection between air pollution in Huntsville and viewership of the American Idol season finale invites a breath of fresh air into the realm of environmental studies. With a dash of humor and a sprinkle of statistical significance, our findings promise to not only broaden the scope of air pollution research but also induce a few chuckles along the way. As we eagerly proceed with our analysis, let us remember that sometimes the most peculiar connections can lead to the most intriguing discoveries – and perhaps a good laugh or two.

[[RESULTS]]
After a thorough and whimsical analysis of the data, the results of our study revealed a striking connection between air pollution in Huntsville and the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. The correlation coefficient of 0.8137815 between these seemingly unrelated variables was as surprising and unexpected as a plot twist in a reality TV show. It's as if the smog and the song's high notes were in perfect harmony, creating a statistical symphony that had us dancing in our lab coats.
The r-squared value of 0.6622403 further emphasized the robustness of this correlation, demonstrating that approximately 66.2% of the variability in the viewership count of the American Idol season finale can be explained by the fluctuations in air pollution levels in Huntsville. It's almost as if the viewers were tuning in not just for the melodious performances but also for the tantalizing tease of air quality data – who would've thought smog could be so mesmerizing?
With a p-value that is lower than the elevator music at a department store, coming in at p < 0.01, our findings provide robust evidence that this correlation is not just a statistical fluke but a true relationship worthy of our attention. You could say the evidence for this correlation is as strong as a Broadway actor's stage presence.
To visually encapsulate the intriguing relationship uncovered by our analysis, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that beautifully illustrates the strong positive correlation between air pollution in Huntsville and the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. The data points create a pattern as striking as a contestant's high note, solidifying the veracity of our findings and sparking joy in the hearts of both science enthusiasts and reality TV aficionados alike.
In summary, our research has shone a comical yet statistically significant spotlight on the unexpected connection between air pollution in Huntsville and the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. As we wrap up this section, we can't help but marvel at the whimsical tale of smog, songs, and statistical significance that has unfolded before our eyes – it's like a statistical rollercoaster ride through the avenues of entertainment and environmental data.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

In the words of Charles Dickens, it was the best of times, it was the worst of times, and certainly the smoggiest of times in Huntsville. Our findings not only validate the unconventional correlation between air pollution and American Idol viewership but also shed light on the whimsical interplay of environmental factors and television entertainment. As we wade through the statistical fog of our results, it becomes clear that the so-called "Huntsville Hustle" is a symphony of syncopated statistics and snappy surprises.

Our research adds a new verse to the aria of air pollution studies, showing that the impact of smog extends beyond the confines of respiratory health and economic repercussions. It's as if Huntsville's air quality plays a supporting role in the dramatic crescendo of American Idol finales, proving that statistical significance and showbiz shenanigans can indeed harmonize. Oh, the sweet melody of absurdity and statistical rigor!

Furthermore, our findings align with previous research in unexpected, albeit comical, ways. To wit, Smith's elucidation of the detrimental effects of air pollution on respiratory health paves the way for our entertaining exploration of Huntsville's smog influencing the breathless anticipation of reality TV audiences. The connection between the two seems almost as natural as peanut butter and jelly—well, perhaps with a touch of particulate matter.

Following Doe's examination of air pollution's impact on climate change, our results take us on a charming detour, suggesting that the changing climate of American Idol finales might just be influenced by the atmospheric composition of Huntsville. Could it be that the rise and fall of pollutant levels mirror the ebbs and flows of viewers' enthusiasm for the season finale performances? It's a whimsical thought, but our data certainly hits all the right notes.

Jones' analysis of air pollution's economic repercussions on local communities sets the stage for our unexpected correlation, as if to say that Huntsville's polluted air doesn't just affect wallets and health but also waltzes into living rooms to influence television programming. Who would have thought that a breath of fresh air in Huntsville might actually mean a dip in American Idol viewership? It's a statistical enigma wrapped in a paradoxical puzzle, sprinkled with a touch of wry humor.

In conclusion, our study not only tickles the ivory keys of statistical significance but also serenades the reader with the whimsical tale of the Huntsville Hustle. As we meander through the comedic corridors of air pollution and television viewership, let us not forget that sometimes, the most unexpected connections can be as poignant as they are amusing. Our research, while undoubtedly a lighthearted romp, underscores the unpredictability and magic that the world of statistics and scientific inquiry can offer. Let the Huntsville Hustle be a reminder that even in the hazy mists of pollution, there's always room for a good laugh and a statistical surprise.

Let our discussion be a testament to the delightful dance of humor and scientific inquiry, a fusion that elevates research from mere fact-finding to an enjoyable intellectual escapade. After all, in the words of Oscar Wilde, "Life is too important to be taken seriously"—and perhaps, the same goes for statistics and scientific investigations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Huntsville and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Huntsville Hustle: Air Pollution and American Idol Season Finale Viewership Scale

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to connect the smoggy dots between air pollution in Huntsville and viewership of the American Idol season finale. With a blend of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and a sprinkle of statistics from Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8137815 and a p-value lower than the limbo stick at a beach party for the years 2002 to 2022. These findings suggest that as the air pollution levels rise in Huntsville, so does the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. We delve into the comical correlation, conjuring up puns about smog, tunes, and TV ratings, while offering a whimsical yet statistically significant explanation for this unexpected environmental-entertainment connection. This paper promises to leave the reader both informed and entertained – just like an American Idol finale.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introducing the Huntsville Hustle: Air Pollution and American Idol Season Finale Viewership Scale
Ladies and gentlemen, prepare to be whisked away on a whimsical whirlwind of wacky research! In this paper, we delve into the comical correlation between the seemingly unrelated realms of air pollution in Huntsville and the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. Strap on your science hats and grab your remote controls, because we're about to embark on a statistical journey that's as captivating as a dramatic Idol performance, with a sprinkle of p-values and a dash of data to keep you on the edge of your seats.
Picture this: A city shrouded in smog, citizens donning their finest face masks like extras in a dystopian film, and yet, nestled within this cloud of pollutants, a peculiar phenomenon emerges. Yes, that's right – we're talking about the riveting rise of American Idol viewership that seems to parallel the increase in air pollution levels. It's like the pollution particles are harmonizing with the TV signals, creating a duet of statistical significance and pop culture. Who would have thought that the correlation coefficient and TV ratings could dance together so harmoniously?
Now, let's not jump to conclusions just yet. Before we embark on this hilarious, yet surprisingly informative journey, let us first lay the groundwork for our study, unpacking the theoretical underpinnings and diving headfirst into the statistical soup. We'll serve up a hearty portion of explanatory variables and a unique blend of data sources to spice up our analysis. Trust us when we say that this is not your average, run-of-the-mill research paper – we've got the statistical chops and the comedic quips to keep you entertained from the abstract to the conclusion.
So, grab a seat and get ready to be tickled pink by the unexpected connections we're about to unravel. As we embark on this research odyssey, you can rest assured that we won't just be examining air pollution and television viewership – we'll also be sprinkling in our findings with puns so sharp, you'll find yourself chuckling like a lab scientist who just discovered a new element on the periodic table. As we unravel this tale of smog, songs, and statistical significance, get ready to have your curiosity piqued and your funny bone tickled. After all, who said research can't be both informative and downright hilarious?
So, without further ado, let's dive into the Huntsville Hustle – a study that promises to leave you both informed and entertained, like an American Idol finale with a side of statistical seasoning!

[[RESULTS]]
After a thorough and whimsical analysis of the data, the results of our study revealed a striking connection between air pollution in Huntsville and the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. The correlation coefficient of 0.8137815 between these seemingly unrelated variables was as surprising and unexpected as a plot twist in a reality TV show. It's as if the smog and the song's high notes were in perfect harmony, creating a statistical symphony that had us dancing in our lab coats.
The r-squared value of 0.6622403 further emphasized the robustness of this correlation, demonstrating that approximately 66.2% of the variability in the viewership count of the American Idol season finale can be explained by the fluctuations in air pollution levels in Huntsville. It's almost as if the viewers were tuning in not just for the melodious performances but also for the tantalizing tease of air quality data – who would've thought smog could be so mesmerizing?
With a p-value that is lower than the elevator music at a department store, coming in at p < 0.01, our findings provide robust evidence that this correlation is not just a statistical fluke but a true relationship worthy of our attention. You could say the evidence for this correlation is as strong as a Broadway actor's stage presence.
To visually encapsulate the intriguing relationship uncovered by our analysis, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that beautifully illustrates the strong positive correlation between air pollution in Huntsville and the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. The data points create a pattern as striking as a contestant's high note, solidifying the veracity of our findings and sparking joy in the hearts of both science enthusiasts and reality TV aficionados alike.
In summary, our research has shone a comical yet statistically significant spotlight on the unexpected connection between air pollution in Huntsville and the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. As we wrap up this section, we can't help but marvel at the whimsical tale of smog, songs, and statistical significance that has unfolded before our eyes – it's like a statistical rollercoaster ride through the avenues of entertainment and environmental data.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has uncovered a connection so unique and unexpected, it's like finding a rare Pokémon in the world of statistical analysis. The correlation between air pollution in Huntsville and the viewership count of the American Idol season finale is as eye-opening as the realization that π is both a Greek letter and a tasty dessert.

As we wrap up this rollercoaster ride of a research paper, it's clear that this is one correlation that's not leaving the stage anytime soon. The statistical symphony of air pollutants and TV ratings has left us humming with wonder and amusement, like a catchy tune that refuses to leave your head.

But alas, all good things must come to an end, much like a binge-watching session of your favorite reality TV show. Therefore, we assert with confidence that no further research is needed in this area. After all, we've already uncovered a correlation as intriguing as a magician's disappearing act. It's time to bid adieu to the Huntsville Hustle and allow this whimsical yet statistically significant discovery to take center stage like a show-stopping finale.

So, as we exit stage left, let's raise a toast to the delightful dalliance with data, the jovial journey through statistics, and the whimsical wanderings of research. After all, who said analytical inquiries couldn't be as entertaining as a comedic performance or as intriguing as a detective novel? It's been a true delight – like discovering a hidden stash of statistical Easter eggs in a data-filled garden.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Huntsville Hustle: Air Pollution and American Idol Season Finale Viewership Scale. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eccentric Environmental Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Huntsville Hustle: Air Pollution and American Idol Season Finale Viewership Scale. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Pop Culture and Atmospheric Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Huntsville Hustle: Air Pollution and American Idol Season Finale Viewership Scale with an abstract of In this study, we set out to connect the smoggy dots between air pollution in Huntsville and viewership of the American Idol season finale. With a blend of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and a sprinkle of statistics from Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8137815 and a p-value lower than the limbo stick at a beach party for the years 2002 to 2022. These findings suggest that as the air pollution levels rise in Huntsville, so does the viewership count of the American Idol season finale. We delve into the comical correlation, conjuring up puns about smog, tunes, and TV ratings, while offering a whimsical yet statistically significant explanation for this unexpected environmental-entertainment connection. This paper promises to leave the reader both informed and entertained – just like an American Idol finale.

ChatGPT:

Huntsville air pollution, American Idol viewership, correlation coefficient, EPA air pollution data, American Idol season finale, environmental-entertainment connection, statistical significance, smog, TV ratings

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Huntsville
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Huntsville, AL
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Huntsville

Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale

Correlation r = 0.8137815 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6622403 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 66.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Huntsville) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.2E-6. 0.0000072126243796711500000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.81 in 0.00072% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 138,646 random variables You don't actually need 138 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.59, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Huntsville (Bad air quality days)30.958938.904134.246637.362636.740342.857150.819722.06331.343332.930528.402416.071416.863913.513515.915910.149324.657529.362915.659324.649920.8219
Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale (Viewers)23020000380600002884000030270000363800003076000031660000288400002422000029290000214900001431000010530000803000013300000086300008740000728000065000006490000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([30.9589,38.9041,34.2466,37.3626,36.7403,42.8571,50.8197,22.063,31.3433,32.9305,28.4024,16.0714,16.8639,13.5135,15.9159,10.1493,24.6575,29.3629,15.6593,24.6499,20.8219,])
array_2 = np.array([23020000,38060000,28840000,30270000,36380000,30760000,31660000,28840000,24220000,29290000,21490000,14310000,10530000,8030000,13300000,0,8630000,8740000,7280000,6500000,6490000,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Huntsville"
array_2_name = "Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 4133 · Black Variable ID: 20730 · Red Variable ID: 89
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0