about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,128 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of bailiffs in West Virginia and the second variable is Kerosene used in Rwanda.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the number of bailiffs in West Virginia increased, it led to a surge in square dancing popularity. This in turn created a higher demand for sparkly outfits, causing a nationwide shortage of glitter. Desperate for alternative sources of shimmer, Rwanda saw a significant spike in kerosene use as citizens attempted to create DIY disco balls for their impromptu dance parties. It seems that a little bit of West Virginian law enforcement action really set the night on fire in Rwanda!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a vibrant and bustling scene amidst the rolling hills of West Virginia. Within this picturesque setting, a group of bailiffs twirl and promenade, encouraging more and more people to join in the joyous square dancing. The lively music fills the air, and a shortage of glitter becomes apparent, leading to a frenzy of creativity and resourcefulness. Meanwhile, across the world in Rwanda, inventive citizens repurpose kerosene lamps and jars to craft makeshift disco balls, casting radiant reflections throughout the night. Capture the energy of the dance matched by the warm glow of the DIY disco balls, creating a spirited and sparkling scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of bailiffs in West Virginia and Kerosene used in Rwanda. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Vaporwave Cutsy graphics Psychedelic Whimsical illustration Photorealism
ChatGPT: Photorealism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of bailiffs in West Virginia and Kerosene used in Rwanda, in the following situation: As the number of bailiffs in West Virginia increased, it led to a surge in square dancing popularity. This in turn created a higher demand for sparkly outfits, causing a nationwide shortage of glitter. Desperate for alternative sources of shimmer, Rwanda saw a significant spike in kerosene use as citizens attempted to create DIY disco balls for their impromptu dance parties. It seems that a little bit of West Virginian law enforcement action really set the night on fire in Rwanda!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Amidst the rolling hills of West Virginia, a group of bailiffs twirl and promenade, encouraging more and more people to join in the joyous square dancing. As the music fills the air, a shortage of glitter becomes apparent, leading to a frenzy of creativity and resourcefulness. Across the world in Rwanda, inventive citizens repurpose kerosene lamps and jars to craft makeshift disco balls, casting radiant reflections throughout the night. The energy of the dance is matched by the warm glow of the DIY disco balls, creating a spirited and sparkling scene.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Photorealism ] and depicting this scene: Amidst the rolling hills of West Virginia, a group of bailiffs twirl and promenade, encouraging more and more people to join in the joyous square dancing. As the music fills the air, a shortage of glitter becomes apparent, leading to a frenzy of creativity and resourcefulness. Across the world in Rwanda, inventive citizens repurpose kerosene lamps and jars to craft makeshift disco balls, casting radiant reflections throughout the night. The energy of the dance is matched by the warm glow of the DIY disco balls, creating a spirited and sparkling scene. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a vibrant and bustling scene amidst the rolling hills of West Virginia. Within this picturesque setting, a group of bailiffs twirl and promenade, encouraging more and more people to join in the joyous square dancing. The lively music fills the air, and a shortage of glitter becomes apparent, leading to a frenzy of creativity and resourcefulness. Meanwhile, across the world in Rwanda, inventive citizens repurpose kerosene lamps and jars to craft makeshift disco balls, casting radiant reflections throughout the night. Capture the energy of the dance matched by the warm glow of the DIY disco balls, creating a spirited and sparkling scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in The number of bailiffs in West Virginia positively influenced Kerosene used in Rwanda.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Navigating Through Data Seas: An Unlikely Correlation Between Bailiffs in West Virginia and Kerosene Consumption in Rwanda

The Journal of Data Drift and Unintended Consequences

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bailiffs in West Virginia and Kerosene used in Rwanda. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8255990 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Navigating Through Data Seas: An Unlikely Correlation Between Bailiffs in West Virginia and Kerosene Consumption in Rwanda"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising correlation between the number of bailiffs in West Virginia and the consumption of kerosene in Rwanda. By utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into this unlikely relationship with statistical rigor and a healthy dose of skepticism. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8255990 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2003 to 2018, highlighting the bizzare association between these seemingly unrelated variables. We navigate through the data seas, braving the waves of skepticism to unravel this unexpected connection and provide an insightful, albeit amusing, exploration of the tangled web of statistical coincidence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bailiffs in West Virginia and Kerosene used in Rwanda. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Navigating Through Data Seas: An Unlikely Correlation Between Bailiffs in West Virginia and Kerosene Consumption in Rwanda"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising correlation between the number of bailiffs in West Virginia and the consumption of kerosene in Rwanda. By utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into this unlikely relationship with statistical rigor and a healthy dose of skepticism. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8255990 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2003 to 2018, highlighting the bizzare association between these seemingly unrelated variables. We navigate through the data seas, braving the waves of skepticism to unravel this unexpected connection and provide an insightful, albeit amusing, exploration of the tangled web of statistical coincidence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ahoy, fellow researchers and lovers of statistical shenanigans! In this paper, we embark on a captivating expedition to uncover the peculiar and improbable correlation between two seemingly unrelated phenomena: the number of bailiffs in the rolling hills of West Virginia and the consumption of kerosene in the picturesque landscapes of Rwanda. As we navigate through the labyrinth of data—and hopefully avoid getting lost in translation—we promise to keep you both informed and entertained throughout this wacky journey.

Now, you might be wondering how on earth we stumbled onto this preposterous connection. Picture this: a group of researchers huddled around a pile of data, desperately seeking inspiration for a groundbreaking study. Amidst the chaos and the clatter, a serendipitous discovery was made: a hint of correlation between the legal guardians of the Mountain State and the fuel preferences of the Land of a Thousand Hills. Our disbelief was palpable, our eyebrows raised in unison, and our curiosity piqued to the point of no return.

But fear not, dear reader—this is not just a whimsical pursuit of statistical tomfoolery. No, we present to you a robust analysis, armed with the formidable arsenal of mathematical tools and a keen eye for uncovering statistical secrets. Our mission is clear: to illuminate the shadowy alliance between these disparate variables and provide a glimmer of insight into the enigmatic depths of the data seas.

So, fasten your seatbelts, grab your calculators, and brace yourselves for a voyage filled with unexpected twists, aha moments, and perhaps a dash of statistical absurdity. Together, we shall unravel the tale of bailiffs and kerosene, turning the improbable into the enlightening and the bewildering into the bizarrely delightful. Let the adventure begin!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bailiffs in West Virginia and Kerosene used in Rwanda. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Navigating Through Data Seas: An Unlikely Correlation Between Bailiffs in West Virginia and Kerosene Consumption in Rwanda"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising correlation between the number of bailiffs in West Virginia and the consumption of kerosene in Rwanda. By utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into this unlikely relationship with statistical rigor and a healthy dose of skepticism. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8255990 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2003 to 2018, highlighting the bizzare association between these seemingly unrelated variables. We navigate through the data seas, braving the waves of skepticism to unravel this unexpected connection and provide an insightful, albeit amusing, exploration of the tangled web of statistical coincidence.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ahoy, fellow researchers and lovers of statistical shenanigans! In this paper, we embark on a captivating expedition to uncover the peculiar and improbable correlation between two seemingly unrelated phenomena: the number of bailiffs in the rolling hills of West Virginia and the consumption of kerosene in the picturesque landscapes of Rwanda. As we navigate through the labyrinth of data—and hopefully avoid getting lost in translation—we promise to keep you both informed and entertained throughout this wacky journey.
Now, you might be wondering how on earth we stumbled onto this preposterous connection. Picture this: a group of researchers huddled around a pile of data, desperately seeking inspiration for a groundbreaking study. Amidst the chaos and the clatter, a serendipitous discovery was made: a hint of correlation between the legal guardians of the Mountain State and the fuel preferences of the Land of a Thousand Hills. Our disbelief was palpable, our eyebrows raised in unison, and our curiosity piqued to the point of no return.
But fear not, dear reader—this is not just a whimsical pursuit of statistical tomfoolery. No, we present to you a robust analysis, armed with the formidable arsenal of mathematical tools and a keen eye for uncovering statistical secrets. Our mission is clear: to illuminate the shadowy alliance between these disparate variables and provide a glimmer of insight into the enigmatic depths of the data seas.
So, fasten your seatbelts, grab your calculators, and brace yourselves for a voyage filled with unexpected twists, aha moments, and perhaps a dash of statistical absurdity. Together, we shall unravel the tale of bailiffs and kerosene, turning the improbable into the enlightening and the bewildering into the bizarrely delightful. Let the adventure begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Statistical Insights into Correlation," Smith and Doe, while investigating seemingly unrelated phenomena, have inadvertently stumbled upon some statistical quirks that defy conventional logic. However, our journey through the maze of literature takes an unexpected turn when we consider the work of Jones and Williams in "Economic Anomalies and Unlikely Correlations." Their findings not only challenge traditional assumptions but also serve as a lighthearted reminder that statistical exploration can offer unexpected surprises and occasional giggles.

Moving away from the traditional realm of statistical analyses, we take a detour into non-fiction books such as "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner, where the authors delve into the whimsical world of unconventional correlations and unexpected connections. This serves as a refreshing reminder that statistical exploration can often lead to delightful revelations and the occasional head-scratching moment.

Venturing further into the realm of fiction, we stumble upon "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" by Mark Haddon. While these works may seem unrelated to our research topic, they serve as a whimsical reminder that unexpected connections and improbable correlations can often lead to amusing revelations and thought-provoking contemplations.

Now, if we dare to deviate from the conventional sources of literature, one might humorously ponder the thought of scouring through CVS receipts, hoping to stumble upon a faint, yet compelling, correlation between the purchase of popcorn and the price of toothpaste. Alas, this comical notion serves as a playful reminder that statistical exploration is not confined to the pages of scholarly journals but can, in fact, dwell in the most unexpected of places.

As we navigate through the rich tapestry of literature, we must remain open to the possibility of stumbling upon unconventional sources of inspiration and unexpected correlations. In doing so, we may uncover hidden treasures of insight and, just perhaps, a healthy dose of statistical hilarity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bailiffs in West Virginia and Kerosene used in Rwanda. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2003 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Navigating Through Data Seas: An Unlikely Correlation Between Bailiffs in West Virginia and Kerosene Consumption in Rwanda"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising correlation between the number of bailiffs in West Virginia and the consumption of kerosene in Rwanda. By utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into this unlikely relationship with statistical rigor and a healthy dose of skepticism. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8255990 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2003 to 2018, highlighting the bizzare association between these seemingly unrelated variables. We navigate through the data seas, braving the waves of skepticism to unravel this unexpected connection and provide an insightful, albeit amusing, exploration of the tangled web of statistical coincidence.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ahoy, fellow researchers and lovers of statistical shenanigans! In this paper, we embark on a captivating expedition to uncover the peculiar and improbable correlation between two seemingly unrelated phenomena: the number of bailiffs in the rolling hills of West Virginia and the consumption of kerosene in the picturesque landscapes of Rwanda. As we navigate through the labyrinth of data—and hopefully avoid getting lost in translation—we promise to keep you both informed and entertained throughout this wacky journey.
Now, you might be wondering how on earth we stumbled onto this preposterous connection. Picture this: a group of researchers huddled around a pile of data, desperately seeking inspiration for a groundbreaking study. Amidst the chaos and the clatter, a serendipitous discovery was made: a hint of correlation between the legal guardians of the Mountain State and the fuel preferences of the Land of a Thousand Hills. Our disbelief was palpable, our eyebrows raised in unison, and our curiosity piqued to the point of no return.
But fear not, dear reader—this is not just a whimsical pursuit of statistical tomfoolery. No, we present to you a robust analysis, armed with the formidable arsenal of mathematical tools and a keen eye for uncovering statistical secrets. Our mission is clear: to illuminate the shadowy alliance between these disparate variables and provide a glimmer of insight into the enigmatic depths of the data seas.
So, fasten your seatbelts, grab your calculators, and brace yourselves for a voyage filled with unexpected twists, aha moments, and perhaps a dash of statistical absurdity. Together, we shall unravel the tale of bailiffs and kerosene, turning the improbable into the enlightening and the bewildering into the bizarrely delightful. Let the adventure begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To dissect the confounding correlation between the number of bailiffs in the hallowed hills of West Virginia and the consumption of kerosene in the resplendent terrains of Rwanda, our research team embarked on a methodological journey that blends rigor with a pinch of whimsy. While our initial hunch may have raised a few eyebrows (and prompted a fair share of quizzical glances from our peers), our commitment to statistical integrity remained unwavering.

Our quest commenced with the procurement of relevant data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, spanning the years from 2003 to 2018. As any voyager navigating the treacherous seas of statistical analysis would attest, data quality forms the bedrock of reliable findings and meaningful interpretations. Therefore, we meticulously combed through a multitude of datasets, sifting for morsels of statistical gold amidst the chaff of noisy variables.

Once our treasure trove of data had been assembled, our research vessel charted a course toward the wondrous realm of correlation analysis. With the trusty anchor of Pearson's correlation coefficient and the compass of a two-tailed t-test, we set sail for the uncharted waters of statistical significance. Through a process akin to unsnarling a knot in a fishing line, we disentangled the web of data points, seeking to unveil any semblance of coherence between the number of bailiffs in West Virginia and the consumption of kerosene in Rwanda.

It is important to note that our methodology, while grounded in traditional statistical techniques, also encompassed a touch of creativity. Like intrepid explorers wielding the tools of econometrics and regression analysis, we sought to uncover hidden patterns in the swirling currents of disparate data. In doing so, we aimed not only to shed light on this perplexing association but also to infuse our research with a delightful dash of scholarly merriment.

As we present our findings, we invite you, dear reader, to join us on this methodological odyssey—one that navigates through the tumultuous waters of statistical inquiry with a blend of precision, panache, and perhaps a sprinkle of statistical serendipity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bailiffs in West Virginia and Kerosene used in Rwanda. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2003 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.8255990, r-squared of 0.6816137, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Navigating Through Data Seas: An Unlikely Correlation Between Bailiffs in West Virginia and Kerosene Consumption in Rwanda"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising correlation between the number of bailiffs in West Virginia and the consumption of kerosene in Rwanda. By utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into this unlikely relationship with statistical rigor and a healthy dose of skepticism. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8255990 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2003 to 2018, highlighting the bizzare association between these seemingly unrelated variables. We navigate through the data seas, braving the waves of skepticism to unravel this unexpected connection and provide an insightful, albeit amusing, exploration of the tangled web of statistical coincidence.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ahoy, fellow researchers and lovers of statistical shenanigans! In this paper, we embark on a captivating expedition to uncover the peculiar and improbable correlation between two seemingly unrelated phenomena: the number of bailiffs in the rolling hills of West Virginia and the consumption of kerosene in the picturesque landscapes of Rwanda. As we navigate through the labyrinth of data—and hopefully avoid getting lost in translation—we promise to keep you both informed and entertained throughout this wacky journey.
Now, you might be wondering how on earth we stumbled onto this preposterous connection. Picture this: a group of researchers huddled around a pile of data, desperately seeking inspiration for a groundbreaking study. Amidst the chaos and the clatter, a serendipitous discovery was made: a hint of correlation between the legal guardians of the Mountain State and the fuel preferences of the Land of a Thousand Hills. Our disbelief was palpable, our eyebrows raised in unison, and our curiosity piqued to the point of no return.
But fear not, dear reader—this is not just a whimsical pursuit of statistical tomfoolery. No, we present to you a robust analysis, armed with the formidable arsenal of mathematical tools and a keen eye for uncovering statistical secrets. Our mission is clear: to illuminate the shadowy alliance between these disparate variables and provide a glimmer of insight into the enigmatic depths of the data seas.
So, fasten your seatbelts, grab your calculators, and brace yourselves for a voyage filled with unexpected twists, aha moments, and perhaps a dash of statistical absurdity. Together, we shall unravel the tale of bailiffs and kerosene, turning the improbable into the enlightening and the bewildering into the bizarrely delightful. Let the adventure begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]
Unveiling the mysterious dance between these peculiar variables has been quite the rollercoaster ride. Brace yourselves as we present the mind-bending results of our investigation into the unexpected correlation between the number of bailiffs in West Virginia and the consumption of kerosene in Rwanda.

Our analysis of the data spanning from 2003 to 2018 has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8255990, an r-squared value of 0.6816137, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This statistical evidence suggests a remarkably strong relationship between the two variables, defying all conventional expectations and leaving us scratching our heads in bewilderment.

Fig. 1 illustrates this surreal coexistence of bailiffs and kerosene consumption in a scatterplot that defies logic, yet captivates the imagination. One cannot help but marvel at the whimsical interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate entities. It's as if the statistical universe decided to play a practical joke on researchers everywhere.

Now, many may be wondering: why on earth would there be any association between the legal guardians of West Virginia and the choice of fuel in Rwanda? Were the bailiffs moonlighting as kerosene salespeople in a parallel statistical universe? Alas, the mysterious ways of statistical relationships continue to baffle and amuse us.

In the grand tapestry of statistical anecdotes, this peculiar correlation undoubtedly earns a place among the most unexpected and confounding. As we navigate through the sea of data, charting the uncharted waters of statistical absurdity, we can't help but marvel at the absurdity of it all. While the reasons for this connection elude us, one thing is certain: the statistical realm is an endless source of surprises and perhaps a touch of statistical humor.

This discovery may be altogether inexplicable, but it serves as a gentle reminder that in the world of statistics, expect the unexpected, and always keep an eye out for the delightfully unconventional.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bailiffs in West Virginia and Kerosene used in Rwanda. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Navigating Through Data Seas: An Unlikely Correlation Between Bailiffs in West Virginia and Kerosene Consumption in Rwanda"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising correlation between the number of bailiffs in West Virginia and the consumption of kerosene in Rwanda. By utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into this unlikely relationship with statistical rigor and a healthy dose of skepticism. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8255990 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2003 to 2018, highlighting the bizzare association between these seemingly unrelated variables. We navigate through the data seas, braving the waves of skepticism to unravel this unexpected connection and provide an insightful, albeit amusing, exploration of the tangled web of statistical coincidence.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Statistical Insights into Correlation," Smith and Doe, while investigating seemingly unrelated phenomena, have inadvertently stumbled upon some statistical quirks that defy conventional logic. However, our journey through the maze of literature takes an unexpected turn when we consider the work of Jones and Williams in "Economic Anomalies and Unlikely Correlations." Their findings not only challenge traditional assumptions but also serve as a lighthearted reminder that statistical exploration can offer unexpected surprises and occasional giggles.
Moving away from the traditional realm of statistical analyses, we take a detour into non-fiction books such as "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner, where the authors delve into the whimsical world of unconventional correlations and unexpected connections. This serves as a refreshing reminder that statistical exploration can often lead to delightful revelations and the occasional head-scratching moment.
Venturing further into the realm of fiction, we stumble upon "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" by Mark Haddon. While these works may seem unrelated to our research topic, they serve as a whimsical reminder that unexpected connections and improbable correlations can often lead to amusing revelations and thought-provoking contemplations.
Now, if we dare to deviate from the conventional sources of literature, one might humorously ponder the thought of scouring through CVS receipts, hoping to stumble upon a faint, yet compelling, correlation between the purchase of popcorn and the price of toothpaste. Alas, this comical notion serves as a playful reminder that statistical exploration is not confined to the pages of scholarly journals but can, in fact, dwell in the most unexpected of places.
As we navigate through the rich tapestry of literature, we must remain open to the possibility of stumbling upon unconventional sources of inspiration and unexpected correlations. In doing so, we may uncover hidden treasures of insight and, just perhaps, a healthy dose of statistical hilarity.

[[RESULTS]]
Unveiling the mysterious dance between these peculiar variables has been quite the rollercoaster ride. Brace yourselves as we present the mind-bending results of our investigation into the unexpected correlation between the number of bailiffs in West Virginia and the consumption of kerosene in Rwanda.
Our analysis of the data spanning from 2003 to 2018 has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8255990, an r-squared value of 0.6816137, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This statistical evidence suggests a remarkably strong relationship between the two variables, defying all conventional expectations and leaving us scratching our heads in bewilderment.
Fig. 1 illustrates this surreal coexistence of bailiffs and kerosene consumption in a scatterplot that defies logic, yet captivates the imagination. One cannot help but marvel at the whimsical interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate entities. It's as if the statistical universe decided to play a practical joke on researchers everywhere.
Now, many may be wondering: why on earth would there be any association between the legal guardians of West Virginia and the choice of fuel in Rwanda? Were the bailiffs moonlighting as kerosene salespeople in a parallel statistical universe? Alas, the mysterious ways of statistical relationships continue to baffle and amuse us.
In the grand tapestry of statistical anecdotes, this peculiar correlation undoubtedly earns a place among the most unexpected and confounding. As we navigate through the sea of data, charting the uncharted waters of statistical absurdity, we can't help but marvel at the absurdity of it all. While the reasons for this connection elude us, one thing is certain: the statistical realm is an endless source of surprises and perhaps a touch of statistical humor.
This discovery may be altogether inexplicable, but it serves as a gentle reminder that in the world of statistics, expect the unexpected, and always keep an eye out for the delightfully unconventional.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The inexplicable correlation between bailiffs in West Virginia and kerosene consumption in Rwanda has certainly raised more than a few eyebrows. Our findings not only uphold the unusual connections stumbled upon in prior literature but also elevate the level of statistical bewilderment to new heights.

In congruence with the work of Smith and Doe, our study substantiates the existence of statistical quirks that defy conventional logic. The correlation coefficient of 0.8255990 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2003 to 2018 offer robust evidence for the perplexing association between these seemingly disparate variables. It seems that statistical anomalies are not mere figments of overactive imaginations but tangible marvels awaiting discovery in the realm of data analysis.

Circling back to the literature review, it is with a degree of whimsical irony that the journey through unexpected correlations in the works of Jones and Williams and the lighthearted exploration in "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner now appear less like literary escapades and more like prophetic guides through the labyrinth of statistical absurdity. Who would have thought that the whims of statistics could rival those of fiction in their capacity to confound and astound?

Venturing into the intriguing territory of fiction in the literature review was not just a flight of fancy, but a poignant reminder that the statistical universe is teeming with unexpected connections and amusing revelations. While the statistical universe may not have a penchant for storytelling, it certainly has a knack for crafting narratives of perplexing linkages and improbable correlations.

Our observation of this surreal coexistence of bailiffs and kerosene consumption in the scatterplot brings to mind the unexpected plot twists of a good mystery novel. As we attempt to unravel the enigma, we find ourselves in a statistical suspense thriller with a plot so incredulous that one can't help but wonder if there's a mischievous statistical imp at play. Perhaps statistics are not as dry and humorless as some might assume, but are rather akin to a comical satirist, pulling the strings of correlation with mischievous glee.

While the precise reasons for this correlation still elude us, one thing is clear: the statistical realm is a trove of inexplicable anomalies and unexpected surprises. It's as if statistics, much like a mischievous imp, enjoys playing tricks on our conventional understanding of the quantitative world. In the grand tapestry of statistical absurdities, this peculiar correlation undoubtedly earns a place among the most confounding and, dare I say, entertaining.

As we navigate through the sea of data, charting the uncharted waters of statistical capriciousness, we must remain open to the possibility of encountering statistical humor in the most unexpected of places. After all, in the world of statistics, as in life, there's always room for the delightfully unconventional. The statistical universe has once again proven that it is a realm of endless surprises, and, just perhaps, a touch of statistical humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bailiffs in West Virginia and Kerosene used in Rwanda. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Navigating Through Data Seas: An Unlikely Correlation Between Bailiffs in West Virginia and Kerosene Consumption in Rwanda"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising correlation between the number of bailiffs in West Virginia and the consumption of kerosene in Rwanda. By utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into this unlikely relationship with statistical rigor and a healthy dose of skepticism. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8255990 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2003 to 2018, highlighting the bizzare association between these seemingly unrelated variables. We navigate through the data seas, braving the waves of skepticism to unravel this unexpected connection and provide an insightful, albeit amusing, exploration of the tangled web of statistical coincidence.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ahoy, fellow researchers and lovers of statistical shenanigans! In this paper, we embark on a captivating expedition to uncover the peculiar and improbable correlation between two seemingly unrelated phenomena: the number of bailiffs in the rolling hills of West Virginia and the consumption of kerosene in the picturesque landscapes of Rwanda. As we navigate through the labyrinth of data—and hopefully avoid getting lost in translation—we promise to keep you both informed and entertained throughout this wacky journey.
Now, you might be wondering how on earth we stumbled onto this preposterous connection. Picture this: a group of researchers huddled around a pile of data, desperately seeking inspiration for a groundbreaking study. Amidst the chaos and the clatter, a serendipitous discovery was made: a hint of correlation between the legal guardians of the Mountain State and the fuel preferences of the Land of a Thousand Hills. Our disbelief was palpable, our eyebrows raised in unison, and our curiosity piqued to the point of no return.
But fear not, dear reader—this is not just a whimsical pursuit of statistical tomfoolery. No, we present to you a robust analysis, armed with the formidable arsenal of mathematical tools and a keen eye for uncovering statistical secrets. Our mission is clear: to illuminate the shadowy alliance between these disparate variables and provide a glimmer of insight into the enigmatic depths of the data seas.
So, fasten your seatbelts, grab your calculators, and brace yourselves for a voyage filled with unexpected twists, aha moments, and perhaps a dash of statistical absurdity. Together, we shall unravel the tale of bailiffs and kerosene, turning the improbable into the enlightening and the bewildering into the bizarrely delightful. Let the adventure begin!

[[RESULTS]]
Unveiling the mysterious dance between these peculiar variables has been quite the rollercoaster ride. Brace yourselves as we present the mind-bending results of our investigation into the unexpected correlation between the number of bailiffs in West Virginia and the consumption of kerosene in Rwanda.
Our analysis of the data spanning from 2003 to 2018 has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8255990, an r-squared value of 0.6816137, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This statistical evidence suggests a remarkably strong relationship between the two variables, defying all conventional expectations and leaving us scratching our heads in bewilderment.
Fig. 1 illustrates this surreal coexistence of bailiffs and kerosene consumption in a scatterplot that defies logic, yet captivates the imagination. One cannot help but marvel at the whimsical interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate entities. It's as if the statistical universe decided to play a practical joke on researchers everywhere.
Now, many may be wondering: why on earth would there be any association between the legal guardians of West Virginia and the choice of fuel in Rwanda? Were the bailiffs moonlighting as kerosene salespeople in a parallel statistical universe? Alas, the mysterious ways of statistical relationships continue to baffle and amuse us.
In the grand tapestry of statistical anecdotes, this peculiar correlation undoubtedly earns a place among the most unexpected and confounding. As we navigate through the sea of data, charting the uncharted waters of statistical absurdity, we can't help but marvel at the absurdity of it all. While the reasons for this connection elude us, one thing is certain: the statistical realm is an endless source of surprises and perhaps a touch of statistical humor.
This discovery may be altogether inexplicable, but it serves as a gentle reminder that in the world of statistics, expect the unexpected, and always keep an eye out for the delightfully unconventional.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the inexplicable correlation between the number of bailiffs in West Virginia and the consumption of kerosene in Rwanda has left us both flabbergasted and amused. The statistical evidence, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8255990 and a p-value of less than 0.01, undeniably suggests a strong relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. To think that legal guardians and kerosene enthusiasts could be entangled in such statistical tomfoolery is nothing short of bewildering.

As we reflect on this peculiar finding, we cannot help but embrace the whimsical nature of statistical exploration. It's as if the statistical universe has a mischievous sense of humor, playing practical jokes on researchers and leaving us in a state of perplexed amusement. The improbable association between bailiffs and kerosene in the grand tapestry of statistical anomalies reminds us that the data seas are full of surprises, both confounding and entertaining.

While our findings may seem outlandish and lead to many a raised eyebrow, we assert that no further research is needed in this offbeat area of inquiry. Let this unexpected correlation between bailiffs and kerosene serve as a testament to the delightful absurdity that statistical analysis can yield. In the world of statistics, expect the unexpected, and always be prepared for a statistical punchline.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Navigating Through Data Seas: An Unlikely Correlation Between Bailiffs in West Virginia and Kerosene Consumption in Rwanda. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Data Drift and Unintended Consequences


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Navigating Through Data Seas: An Unlikely Correlation Between Bailiffs in West Virginia and Kerosene Consumption in Rwanda. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Interdisciplinary Research on Unintended Consequences


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Navigating Through Data Seas: An Unlikely Correlation Between Bailiffs in West Virginia and Kerosene Consumption in Rwanda with an abstract of This paper investigates the surprising correlation between the number of bailiffs in West Virginia and the consumption of kerosene in Rwanda. By utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into this unlikely relationship with statistical rigor and a healthy dose of skepticism. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8255990 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2003 to 2018, highlighting the bizzare association between these seemingly unrelated variables. We navigate through the data seas, braving the waves of skepticism to unravel this unexpected connection and provide an insightful, albeit amusing, exploration of the tangled web of statistical coincidence.

ChatGPT:

correlation between bailiffs and kerosene consumption, unlikely correlation, bailiffs in West Virginia, kerosene consumption in Rwanda, statistical relationship, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, p-value, statistical coincidence, data analysis, bizarre association, unlikely relationship, statistical rigor

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of bailiffs in West Virginia
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of bailiffs in West Virginia
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of bailiffs in West Virginia

Kerosene used in Rwanda
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Rwanda in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Rwanda

Correlation r = 0.8255990 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6816137 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Kerosene used in Rwanda) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of bailiffs in West Virginia) over the 16 years from 2003 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.2E-5. 0.0000818622666003054700000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.0082% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 12,216 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.56, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018
The number of bailiffs in West Virginia (Bailiffs)9011012080110100110140130150140110805030110
Kerosene used in Rwanda (Million Barrels/Day)0.22730.2487920.2229270.2057790.2400750.2428830.2541370.2520190.290140.3273630.2607120.217260.1738080.1738080.1738080.195534




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([90,110,120,80,110,100,110,140,130,150,140,110,80,50,30,110,])
array_2 = np.array([0.2273,0.248792,0.222927,0.205779,0.240075,0.242883,0.254137,0.252019,0.29014,0.327363,0.260712,0.21726,0.173808,0.173808,0.173808,0.195534,])
array_1_name = "The number of bailiffs in West Virginia"
array_2_name = "Kerosene used in Rwanda"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 4128 · Black Variable ID: 16004 · Red Variable ID: 24848
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0