about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,101 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Johnna and the second variable is Air pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia.  The chart goes from 1983 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the popularity of the first name Johnna decreased, there were fewer individuals in Parkersburg, West Virginia, who shared that name. This led to a decrease in the collective carbon footprint of all the Johnnas in the area. With fewer Johnnas present, there was a noticeable decrease in the amount of gas emissions from their vehicles, ultimately contributing to an improvement in air quality. It's as if the Johnnas had been unknowingly competing in a pollution derby, and their declining numbers led to a breath of fresh air for Parkersburg.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Style: A vibrant, cartoon-style illustration with a touch of whimsy and humor, reminiscent of a classic comic strip, featuring bold colors and exaggerated expressions. Scene: A bustling street in Parkersburg, West Virginia, with a clear blue sky overhead. In the foreground, there are cars with comically exaggerated exhaust pipes, cartoonishly emitting dense, dark clouds of smoke. In the background, a line chart visualizes the air quality, with the line dramatically dipping downwards as the number of Johnnas in the area decreases. Meanwhile, a caricature of a happy environmentalist can be seen holding up a sign that reads "Less Johnnas = Fresher Air! Go Green, Go Johnna-less!" The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Johnna and Air pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyberpunk Cutsy graphics Cutsy graphics Hyper-realistic a funny image you would see on reddit
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Johnna and Air pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia, in the following situation: As the popularity of the first name Johnna decreased, there were fewer individuals in Parkersburg, West Virginia, who shared that name. This led to a decrease in the collective carbon footprint of all the Johnnas in the area. With fewer Johnnas present, there was a noticeable decrease in the amount of gas emissions from their vehicles, ultimately contributing to an improvement in air quality. It's as if the Johnnas had been unknowingly competing in a pollution derby, and their declining numbers led to a breath of fresh air for Parkersburg.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Parkersburg, West Virginia, fewer Johnnas meant cleaner air. With a decrease in the popularity of the name Johnna in the area, there were fewer Johnnas driving around, leading to a noticeable improvement in air quality.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: In Parkersburg, West Virginia, fewer Johnnas meant cleaner air. With a decrease in the popularity of the name Johnna in the area, there were fewer Johnnas driving around, leading to a noticeable improvement in air quality. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Style: A vibrant, cartoon-style illustration with a touch of whimsy and humor, reminiscent of a classic comic strip, featuring bold colors and exaggerated expressions. Scene: A bustling street in Parkersburg, West Virginia, with a clear blue sky overhead. In the foreground, there are cars with comically exaggerated exhaust pipes, cartoonishly emitting dense, dark clouds of smoke. In the background, a line chart visualizes the air quality, with the line dramatically dipping downwards as the number of Johnnas in the area decreases. Meanwhile, a caricature of a happy environmentalist can be seen holding up a sign that reads "Less Johnnas = Fresher Air! Go Green, Go Johnna-less!"

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Johnna caused Air pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Johnna Conundrum: Is Air Pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia a Breath of Fresh Aire?

The Journal of Environmental Quirkiness

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Johnna and Air pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7031419 and p < 0.01 for 1983 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Johnna Conundrum: Is Air Pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia a Breath of Fresh Aire?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves deep into the whimsical world of first names and air pollution, presenting a surprising correlation between the popularity of the first name Johnna and the air quality in Parkersburg, West Virginia. With a dash of humor, a pinch of puns, and a sprinkle of statistical analysis, we bring to light the unexpected link between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency to tickle the fancy of curiosity and uncover the amusing connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7031419 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1983 to 2022, this paper unveils the chuckle-worthy tale of how the prevalence of the name Johnna may be blowing fresh air or adding a haze of confusion in the charming town of Parkersburg. So, buckle up for an air-tight analysis of this offbeat correlation, and get ready to breathe in the unexpected findings of the Johnna conundrum.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Johnna and Air pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Johnna Conundrum: Is Air Pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia a Breath of Fresh Aire?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves deep into the whimsical world of first names and air pollution, presenting a surprising correlation between the popularity of the first name Johnna and the air quality in Parkersburg, West Virginia. With a dash of humor, a pinch of puns, and a sprinkle of statistical analysis, we bring to light the unexpected link between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency to tickle the fancy of curiosity and uncover the amusing connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7031419 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1983 to 2022, this paper unveils the chuckle-worthy tale of how the prevalence of the name Johnna may be blowing fresh air or adding a haze of confusion in the charming town of Parkersburg. So, buckle up for an air-tight analysis of this offbeat correlation, and get ready to breathe in the unexpected findings of the Johnna conundrum.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Ah, the whimsical world of academic research! Today, we embark on a delightful journey into the seemingly harebrained but surprisingly intriguing connection between a first name and air pollution. Picture this: a small town, nestled snugly in the hills of West Virginia, where a quirky correlation has captured the attention of researchers. Yes, we're talking about the peculiar pairing of the first name "Johnna" and the air quality in Parkersburg, West Virginia. This is no ordinary tale of scientific investigation – it's a comical caper that unfolds with data as our accomplice and statistics as our trusty sidekick. Prepare for a riveting ride as we dissect the Johnna conundrum and see if the air in Parkersburg is truly a breath of fresh "Aire"!

Who would have thought that a name could be linked to the air we breathe? Yet, with a blend of jest and scholarly scrutiny, we aim to unravel the tale and tickle your academic palate. The concoction of enthusiasm, curiosity, and a pinch of skepticism has led us to unveil an unexpected connection that has raised eyebrows and spirits alike.

As we delve into the idyllic town of Parkersburg, we cannot help but wonder – is there a storm of confusion brewing, or are we about to unearth a quirky quirk of fate? To answer this question, we called upon the power of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency – because when life presents you with a curious correlation, you should always have the statistical tools to paint the full picture!

So, gather 'round, dear readers, as we embark on an academic escapade like no other. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7031419 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1983 to 2022, we invite you to embrace the chuckle-worthy tale of the Johnna conundrum. Let's break through the haze and breathe in the unexpected findings in our quest to tease out whether the name Johnna heralds a gust of fresh air or a cloud of befuddlement in the charming town of Parkersburg. Are you ready to embark on this whimsical excursion into the statistical rollercoaster that is the Johnna conundrum? Strap in and get ready to laugh – and learn – as we navigate this unexpected correlation. Let the adventure begin!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Johnna and Air pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Johnna Conundrum: Is Air Pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia a Breath of Fresh Aire?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves deep into the whimsical world of first names and air pollution, presenting a surprising correlation between the popularity of the first name Johnna and the air quality in Parkersburg, West Virginia. With a dash of humor, a pinch of puns, and a sprinkle of statistical analysis, we bring to light the unexpected link between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency to tickle the fancy of curiosity and uncover the amusing connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7031419 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1983 to 2022, this paper unveils the chuckle-worthy tale of how the prevalence of the name Johnna may be blowing fresh air or adding a haze of confusion in the charming town of Parkersburg. So, buckle up for an air-tight analysis of this offbeat correlation, and get ready to breathe in the unexpected findings of the Johnna conundrum.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the whimsical world of academic research! Today, we embark on a delightful journey into the seemingly harebrained but surprisingly intriguing connection between a first name and air pollution. Picture this: a small town, nestled snugly in the hills of West Virginia, where a quirky correlation has captured the attention of researchers. Yes, we're talking about the peculiar pairing of the first name "Johnna" and the air quality in Parkersburg, West Virginia. This is no ordinary tale of scientific investigation – it's a comical caper that unfolds with data as our accomplice and statistics as our trusty sidekick. Prepare for a riveting ride as we dissect the Johnna conundrum and see if the air in Parkersburg is truly a breath of fresh "Aire"!
Who would have thought that a name could be linked to the air we breathe? Yet, with a blend of jest and scholarly scrutiny, we aim to unravel the tale and tickle your academic palate. The concoction of enthusiasm, curiosity, and a pinch of skepticism has led us to unveil an unexpected connection that has raised eyebrows and spirits alike.
As we delve into the idyllic town of Parkersburg, we cannot help but wonder – is there a storm of confusion brewing, or are we about to unearth a quirky quirk of fate? To answer this question, we called upon the power of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency – because when life presents you with a curious correlation, you should always have the statistical tools to paint the full picture!
So, gather 'round, dear readers, as we embark on an academic escapade like no other. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7031419 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1983 to 2022, we invite you to embrace the chuckle-worthy tale of the Johnna conundrum. Let's break through the haze and breathe in the unexpected findings in our quest to tease out whether the name Johnna heralds a gust of fresh air or a cloud of befuddlement in the charming town of Parkersburg. Are you ready to embark on this whimsical excursion into the statistical rollercoaster that is the Johnna conundrum? Strap in and get ready to laugh – and learn – as we navigate this unexpected correlation. Let the adventure begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In the quest to unearth the whimsical correlation between the popularity of the first name Johnna and air pollution levels in Parkersburg, West Virginia, researchers have embarked on a comical journey through a variety of academic studies and lighthearted observations. Smith et al. (2015) initially delved into the societal implications of first names, shedding light on the impact of social perception and personal identity. Doe and Jones (2018) also explored the intriguing realm of air pollution and its effects on community well-being, providing a solid foundation for our investigation.

Moving beyond the traditional academic sphere, the literary world has also offered intriguing parallels. In "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Study" by Author A. Pollutant, the importance of clean air and its impact on society is presented with a mix of seriousness and witty anecdotes. Additionally, the work of Author B. Fresh in "Name Games: The Quirky Quandary of Popular Names" introduces a playful take on the influence of names in daily life, mirroring our lighthearted approach to the Johnna conundrum.

Shifting to the realm of fiction, the novels "The Airborne Affair" by Imagina T. Ively and "Johnna's Journey: A Tale of Twists and Turns" by Story T. Eller provide fictional narratives that, while not directly related to our topic, offer a playful backdrop for our exploration. These unexpected connections have encouraged our research team to approach the correlation with a blend of rigor and whimsy, guided by the enchanting allure of unexpected discoveries.

Beyond the written word, popular culture has also woven its delightful tapestry into our investigation. Through a careful analysis of cartoon characters and children's shows, we've gleaned a newfound appreciation for the playful connection between names and the air we breathe. As we engage in a scholarly dissection of the Johnna conundrum, the influence of animated figures such as "Johnny Bravo" and "Joanna the Jet-Setter" has added a whimsical touch to our research endeavors, reminding us that curiosity knows no bounds.

In the pursuit of academic merriment, our literature review has traversed the traditional, the fictional, and the animated, all in an effort to infuse our research with a delightful blend of curiosity and amusement. With a dash of humor and a sprinkle of scholarly rigor, we continue to unravel the peculiar correlation between the first name Johnna and the air pollution levels in Parkersburg, inviting readers to join us in this academically whimsical escapade.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Johnna and Air pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 1983 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Johnna Conundrum: Is Air Pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia a Breath of Fresh Aire?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves deep into the whimsical world of first names and air pollution, presenting a surprising correlation between the popularity of the first name Johnna and the air quality in Parkersburg, West Virginia. With a dash of humor, a pinch of puns, and a sprinkle of statistical analysis, we bring to light the unexpected link between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency to tickle the fancy of curiosity and uncover the amusing connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7031419 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1983 to 2022, this paper unveils the chuckle-worthy tale of how the prevalence of the name Johnna may be blowing fresh air or adding a haze of confusion in the charming town of Parkersburg. So, buckle up for an air-tight analysis of this offbeat correlation, and get ready to breathe in the unexpected findings of the Johnna conundrum.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the whimsical world of academic research! Today, we embark on a delightful journey into the seemingly harebrained but surprisingly intriguing connection between a first name and air pollution. Picture this: a small town, nestled snugly in the hills of West Virginia, where a quirky correlation has captured the attention of researchers. Yes, we're talking about the peculiar pairing of the first name "Johnna" and the air quality in Parkersburg, West Virginia. This is no ordinary tale of scientific investigation – it's a comical caper that unfolds with data as our accomplice and statistics as our trusty sidekick. Prepare for a riveting ride as we dissect the Johnna conundrum and see if the air in Parkersburg is truly a breath of fresh "Aire"!
Who would have thought that a name could be linked to the air we breathe? Yet, with a blend of jest and scholarly scrutiny, we aim to unravel the tale and tickle your academic palate. The concoction of enthusiasm, curiosity, and a pinch of skepticism has led us to unveil an unexpected connection that has raised eyebrows and spirits alike.
As we delve into the idyllic town of Parkersburg, we cannot help but wonder – is there a storm of confusion brewing, or are we about to unearth a quirky quirk of fate? To answer this question, we called upon the power of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency – because when life presents you with a curious correlation, you should always have the statistical tools to paint the full picture!
So, gather 'round, dear readers, as we embark on an academic escapade like no other. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7031419 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1983 to 2022, we invite you to embrace the chuckle-worthy tale of the Johnna conundrum. Let's break through the haze and breathe in the unexpected findings in our quest to tease out whether the name Johnna heralds a gust of fresh air or a cloud of befuddlement in the charming town of Parkersburg. Are you ready to embark on this whimsical excursion into the statistical rollercoaster that is the Johnna conundrum? Strap in and get ready to laugh – and learn – as we navigate this unexpected correlation. Let the adventure begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unlock the quirky conundrum surrounding the connection between the popularity of the first name Johnna and air pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia, our research team concocted a blend of data collection methods that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow in bemusement.

First, we delved into the treasure trove of the US Social Security Administration's baby names database, where the ebbs and flows of Johnna's popularity over the years were meticulously distilled. Our intrepid journey through this database was akin to venturing into a labyrinth of nomenclatural wonder, where the waves of popularity crashed against the shores of statistical inference with each passing year.

But of course, no whimsical research pursuit is complete without descending into the depths of environmental data. Sourcing information from the Environmental Protection Agency's comprehensive air quality reports, we navigated through the atmospheric mists of Parkersburg, West Virginia, in search of the elusive connection between air pollution and the ebb and flow of Johnna as a name.

Now, here's where the true magic – and madness – ensued. In order to blend these disparate datasets into a potion of statistical significance, we engaged in a dance of correlations, p-values, and regression analyses that would make even the most stoic of researchers crack a wry smile. We summoned the mystical powers of statistical software to weave a tapestry of numbers, coefficients, and confidence intervals, unraveling a web of insight that brought both revelation and amusement.

With data spanning from 1983 to 2022, our statistical incantations revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7031419 and a p-value less than 0.01 between the name Johnna's popularity and air pollution in the whimsical town of Parkersburg, West Virginia. A correlation so unexpected, it might just prompt a chuckle or two.

So, let it be known that no stone was left unturned, no correlation left unexplored, and no statistical analysis left uninfused with a dash of whimsy in our pursuit of untangling the Johnna conundrum. As we clink our data-filled goblets in celebration of this statistical escapade, let us raise a toast to the quirkiness of research, the unexpected connections in the world, and the joy of uncovering the humorous side of academia. Cheers to the Johnna conundrum – an ode to statistical whimsy!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Johnna and Air pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 1983 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7031419, r-squared of 0.4944085, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Johnna Conundrum: Is Air Pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia a Breath of Fresh Aire?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves deep into the whimsical world of first names and air pollution, presenting a surprising correlation between the popularity of the first name Johnna and the air quality in Parkersburg, West Virginia. With a dash of humor, a pinch of puns, and a sprinkle of statistical analysis, we bring to light the unexpected link between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency to tickle the fancy of curiosity and uncover the amusing connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7031419 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1983 to 2022, this paper unveils the chuckle-worthy tale of how the prevalence of the name Johnna may be blowing fresh air or adding a haze of confusion in the charming town of Parkersburg. So, buckle up for an air-tight analysis of this offbeat correlation, and get ready to breathe in the unexpected findings of the Johnna conundrum.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the whimsical world of academic research! Today, we embark on a delightful journey into the seemingly harebrained but surprisingly intriguing connection between a first name and air pollution. Picture this: a small town, nestled snugly in the hills of West Virginia, where a quirky correlation has captured the attention of researchers. Yes, we're talking about the peculiar pairing of the first name "Johnna" and the air quality in Parkersburg, West Virginia. This is no ordinary tale of scientific investigation – it's a comical caper that unfolds with data as our accomplice and statistics as our trusty sidekick. Prepare for a riveting ride as we dissect the Johnna conundrum and see if the air in Parkersburg is truly a breath of fresh "Aire"!
Who would have thought that a name could be linked to the air we breathe? Yet, with a blend of jest and scholarly scrutiny, we aim to unravel the tale and tickle your academic palate. The concoction of enthusiasm, curiosity, and a pinch of skepticism has led us to unveil an unexpected connection that has raised eyebrows and spirits alike.
As we delve into the idyllic town of Parkersburg, we cannot help but wonder – is there a storm of confusion brewing, or are we about to unearth a quirky quirk of fate? To answer this question, we called upon the power of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency – because when life presents you with a curious correlation, you should always have the statistical tools to paint the full picture!
So, gather 'round, dear readers, as we embark on an academic escapade like no other. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7031419 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1983 to 2022, we invite you to embrace the chuckle-worthy tale of the Johnna conundrum. Let's break through the haze and breathe in the unexpected findings in our quest to tease out whether the name Johnna heralds a gust of fresh air or a cloud of befuddlement in the charming town of Parkersburg. Are you ready to embark on this whimsical excursion into the statistical rollercoaster that is the Johnna conundrum? Strap in and get ready to laugh – and learn – as we navigate this unexpected correlation. Let the adventure begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency has blown a breath of fresh "Aire" into the realm of quirky correlations. We found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7031419 between the popularity of the first name Johnna and air pollution levels in Parkersburg, West Virginia for the years 1983 to 2022. It seems like there's more than just air circulating in the town – there's a hint of whimsy and wonder in this unexpected connection!

The r-squared value of 0.4944085 further emphasized the significant relationship between the two variables. It's as if the name Johnna has been whispering subtle cues into the wind, nudging the air quality in Parkersburg on a whimsical journey of its own. This intriguing correlation left us in a state of delighted befuddlement, as it unfolded like a plot twist in a whimsical comedy.

In fact, the p-value being less than 0.01 added a sprinkle of statistical certainty to our findings, reassuring us that this correlation is not just a figment of our imagination. The data told a story of its own, weaving a whimsical tale of how a first name can be intertwined with the air we breathe.

Furthermore, to visually capture the essence of this unexpected connection, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that captures the strong correlation between the popularity of the name Johnna and air pollution levels in Parkersburg. It's like a whimsical dance between statistical significance and quaint curiosity, with each data point adding to the whimsy of the correlation.

In conclusion, our findings have breathed a gust of fresh excitement into the field of offbeat correlations, reminding us that even the most unexpected pairings can lead to intriguing discoveries. So, let's savor this comical caper and revel in the statistical whimsy of the Johnna conundrum, for it has truly blown a breath of fresh air into the academic atmosphere!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Johnna and Air pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Johnna Conundrum: Is Air Pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia a Breath of Fresh Aire?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves deep into the whimsical world of first names and air pollution, presenting a surprising correlation between the popularity of the first name Johnna and the air quality in Parkersburg, West Virginia. With a dash of humor, a pinch of puns, and a sprinkle of statistical analysis, we bring to light the unexpected link between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency to tickle the fancy of curiosity and uncover the amusing connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7031419 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1983 to 2022, this paper unveils the chuckle-worthy tale of how the prevalence of the name Johnna may be blowing fresh air or adding a haze of confusion in the charming town of Parkersburg. So, buckle up for an air-tight analysis of this offbeat correlation, and get ready to breathe in the unexpected findings of the Johnna conundrum.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the quest to unearth the whimsical correlation between the popularity of the first name Johnna and air pollution levels in Parkersburg, West Virginia, researchers have embarked on a comical journey through a variety of academic studies and lighthearted observations. Smith et al. (2015) initially delved into the societal implications of first names, shedding light on the impact of social perception and personal identity. Doe and Jones (2018) also explored the intriguing realm of air pollution and its effects on community well-being, providing a solid foundation for our investigation.
Moving beyond the traditional academic sphere, the literary world has also offered intriguing parallels. In "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Study" by Author A. Pollutant, the importance of clean air and its impact on society is presented with a mix of seriousness and witty anecdotes. Additionally, the work of Author B. Fresh in "Name Games: The Quirky Quandary of Popular Names" introduces a playful take on the influence of names in daily life, mirroring our lighthearted approach to the Johnna conundrum.
Shifting to the realm of fiction, the novels "The Airborne Affair" by Imagina T. Ively and "Johnna's Journey: A Tale of Twists and Turns" by Story T. Eller provide fictional narratives that, while not directly related to our topic, offer a playful backdrop for our exploration. These unexpected connections have encouraged our research team to approach the correlation with a blend of rigor and whimsy, guided by the enchanting allure of unexpected discoveries.
Beyond the written word, popular culture has also woven its delightful tapestry into our investigation. Through a careful analysis of cartoon characters and children's shows, we've gleaned a newfound appreciation for the playful connection between names and the air we breathe. As we engage in a scholarly dissection of the Johnna conundrum, the influence of animated figures such as "Johnny Bravo" and "Joanna the Jet-Setter" has added a whimsical touch to our research endeavors, reminding us that curiosity knows no bounds.
In the pursuit of academic merriment, our literature review has traversed the traditional, the fictional, and the animated, all in an effort to infuse our research with a delightful blend of curiosity and amusement. With a dash of humor and a sprinkle of scholarly rigor, we continue to unravel the peculiar correlation between the first name Johnna and the air pollution levels in Parkersburg, inviting readers to join us in this academically whimsical escapade.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency has blown a breath of fresh "Aire" into the realm of quirky correlations. We found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7031419 between the popularity of the first name Johnna and air pollution levels in Parkersburg, West Virginia for the years 1983 to 2022. It seems like there's more than just air circulating in the town – there's a hint of whimsy and wonder in this unexpected connection!
The r-squared value of 0.4944085 further emphasized the significant relationship between the two variables. It's as if the name Johnna has been whispering subtle cues into the wind, nudging the air quality in Parkersburg on a whimsical journey of its own. This intriguing correlation left us in a state of delighted befuddlement, as it unfolded like a plot twist in a whimsical comedy.
In fact, the p-value being less than 0.01 added a sprinkle of statistical certainty to our findings, reassuring us that this correlation is not just a figment of our imagination. The data told a story of its own, weaving a whimsical tale of how a first name can be intertwined with the air we breathe.
Furthermore, to visually capture the essence of this unexpected connection, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that captures the strong correlation between the popularity of the name Johnna and air pollution levels in Parkersburg. It's like a whimsical dance between statistical significance and quaint curiosity, with each data point adding to the whimsy of the correlation.
In conclusion, our findings have breathed a gust of fresh excitement into the field of offbeat correlations, reminding us that even the most unexpected pairings can lead to intriguing discoveries. So, let's savor this comical caper and revel in the statistical whimsy of the Johnna conundrum, for it has truly blown a breath of fresh air into the academic atmosphere!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings present an intriguing confluence of statistical significance and whimsical humor, shedding light on the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Johnna and air pollution levels in Parkersburg, West Virginia. As we delve into the discussion, it is evident that our results lend further credence to the prior research that intertwined the chuckle-worthy realm of first names and air quality.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.7031419 mirrors the comical and outrageous connections we encountered in the literature review. Much like the whimsical narratives of "The Airborne Affair" and "Johnna's Journey: A Tale of Twists and Turns," our statistical analysis unfolded with unexpected twists and turns, highlighting the delightful emergence of this unlikely correlation. It's as if the statistical data itself was whispering playful cues, nudging us to unravel the whimsical tale of the Johnna conundrum.

The r-squared value of 0.4944085 further reaffirms the significant relationship between the prevalence of the name Johnna and air pollution levels, akin to the captivating prose of Author A. Pollutant and the playful take of Author B. Fresh in "Name Games: The Quirky Quandary of Popular Names." Our statistical analysis seems to have embraced the welcomed whimsicality that permeated our scholarly journey. The unexpected link between a first name and air quality has certainly added a dash of joviality to the serious realm of environmental research.

Moreover, the p-value being less than 0.01 lends a dash of statistical certainty to the quirky correlation, akin to our exploration of cartoon characters and children's shows in the literature review. This statistical reassurance serves as a lighthearted reminder that even the most whimsical correlations can have a grounding in empirical evidence, akin to a playful twist in an animated tale.

As we reflect on the scatterplot presented in Fig. 1, it is evident that the whimsical dance between statistical significance and scholarly curiosity truly captures the essence of our findings. Each data point seems to add to the amusement of the correlation, akin to the lively antics of "Johnny Bravo" and "Joanna the Jet-Setter" in popular culture.

In essence, our discussion of the findings playfully intertwines statistical rigor and delightful whimsy, showcasing the unexpected and amusing correlations that can emerge in scholarly research. The Johnna conundrum has truly blown a breath of fresh excitement into the academic atmosphere, leaving us with a whimsical twist worthy of a playful comedic caper. So, let's savor this statistical comedy and revel in the quirky absurdity of academic research, for it takes us on a delightful journey filled with unexpected discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Johnna and Air pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Johnna Conundrum: Is Air Pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia a Breath of Fresh Aire?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves deep into the whimsical world of first names and air pollution, presenting a surprising correlation between the popularity of the first name Johnna and the air quality in Parkersburg, West Virginia. With a dash of humor, a pinch of puns, and a sprinkle of statistical analysis, we bring to light the unexpected link between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency to tickle the fancy of curiosity and uncover the amusing connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7031419 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1983 to 2022, this paper unveils the chuckle-worthy tale of how the prevalence of the name Johnna may be blowing fresh air or adding a haze of confusion in the charming town of Parkersburg. So, buckle up for an air-tight analysis of this offbeat correlation, and get ready to breathe in the unexpected findings of the Johnna conundrum.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the whimsical world of academic research! Today, we embark on a delightful journey into the seemingly harebrained but surprisingly intriguing connection between a first name and air pollution. Picture this: a small town, nestled snugly in the hills of West Virginia, where a quirky correlation has captured the attention of researchers. Yes, we're talking about the peculiar pairing of the first name "Johnna" and the air quality in Parkersburg, West Virginia. This is no ordinary tale of scientific investigation – it's a comical caper that unfolds with data as our accomplice and statistics as our trusty sidekick. Prepare for a riveting ride as we dissect the Johnna conundrum and see if the air in Parkersburg is truly a breath of fresh "Aire"!
Who would have thought that a name could be linked to the air we breathe? Yet, with a blend of jest and scholarly scrutiny, we aim to unravel the tale and tickle your academic palate. The concoction of enthusiasm, curiosity, and a pinch of skepticism has led us to unveil an unexpected connection that has raised eyebrows and spirits alike.
As we delve into the idyllic town of Parkersburg, we cannot help but wonder – is there a storm of confusion brewing, or are we about to unearth a quirky quirk of fate? To answer this question, we called upon the power of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency – because when life presents you with a curious correlation, you should always have the statistical tools to paint the full picture!
So, gather 'round, dear readers, as we embark on an academic escapade like no other. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7031419 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1983 to 2022, we invite you to embrace the chuckle-worthy tale of the Johnna conundrum. Let's break through the haze and breathe in the unexpected findings in our quest to tease out whether the name Johnna heralds a gust of fresh air or a cloud of befuddlement in the charming town of Parkersburg. Are you ready to embark on this whimsical excursion into the statistical rollercoaster that is the Johnna conundrum? Strap in and get ready to laugh – and learn – as we navigate this unexpected correlation. Let the adventure begin!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency has blown a breath of fresh "Aire" into the realm of quirky correlations. We found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7031419 between the popularity of the first name Johnna and air pollution levels in Parkersburg, West Virginia for the years 1983 to 2022. It seems like there's more than just air circulating in the town – there's a hint of whimsy and wonder in this unexpected connection!
The r-squared value of 0.4944085 further emphasized the significant relationship between the two variables. It's as if the name Johnna has been whispering subtle cues into the wind, nudging the air quality in Parkersburg on a whimsical journey of its own. This intriguing correlation left us in a state of delighted befuddlement, as it unfolded like a plot twist in a whimsical comedy.
In fact, the p-value being less than 0.01 added a sprinkle of statistical certainty to our findings, reassuring us that this correlation is not just a figment of our imagination. The data told a story of its own, weaving a whimsical tale of how a first name can be intertwined with the air we breathe.
Furthermore, to visually capture the essence of this unexpected connection, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that captures the strong correlation between the popularity of the name Johnna and air pollution levels in Parkersburg. It's like a whimsical dance between statistical significance and quaint curiosity, with each data point adding to the whimsy of the correlation.
In conclusion, our findings have breathed a gust of fresh excitement into the field of offbeat correlations, reminding us that even the most unexpected pairings can lead to intriguing discoveries. So, let's savor this comical caper and revel in the statistical whimsy of the Johnna conundrum, for it has truly blown a breath of fresh air into the academic atmosphere!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In closing, our whimsical escapade into the Johnna conundrum has uncovered a truly "air-resistible" correlation between the popularity of the first name Johnna and air pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.7031419 has left us feeling like we stumbled upon a whimsical secret whispered in the wind, and the r-squared value of 0.4944085 further solidifies the significance of this surprising connection – talk about a breath of fresh "Aire"! The p-value less than 0.01 reassures us that this isn't just a puff of whimsy, but a genuine finding that's as clear as the air after a rainstorm.

As we bid adieu to this amusing correlation, it's clear that the name Johnna may indeed be influencing the air quality in Parkersburg, proving that the town's atmosphere is filled with more than just oxygen and pollutants – there's a hint of statistical whimsy too. We can't help but chuckle at the thought of Johnna having a secret talent for influencing atmospheric conditions, adding a touch of charm to the very air we breathe.

So, as we wrap up this bubbly exploration, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. After all, we've captured the whimsy, the chuckles, and the statistical quirks of the Johnna conundrum – what more could one ask for? This unexpected correlation has blown through the academic atmosphere like a breath of fresh air, leaving us with a tale of statistical marvel and whimsical enchantment that we'll be laughing about for years to come!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Johnna Conundrum: Is Air Pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia a Breath of Fresh Aire?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Environmental Quirkiness


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Johnna Conundrum: Is Air Pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia a Breath of Fresh Aire?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Clean Air Research and Environmental Solutions


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Johnna Conundrum: Is Air Pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia a Breath of Fresh Aire? with an abstract of This research paper delves deep into the whimsical world of first names and air pollution, presenting a surprising correlation between the popularity of the first name Johnna and the air quality in Parkersburg, West Virginia. With a dash of humor, a pinch of puns, and a sprinkle of statistical analysis, we bring to light the unexpected link between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency to tickle the fancy of curiosity and uncover the amusing connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7031419 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1983 to 2022, this paper unveils the chuckle-worthy tale of how the prevalence of the name Johnna may be blowing fresh air or adding a haze of confusion in the charming town of Parkersburg. So, buckle up for an air-tight analysis of this offbeat correlation, and get ready to breathe in the unexpected findings of the Johnna conundrum.

ChatGPT:

Parkersburg, West Virginia air pollution, Johnna name popularity, correlation between name and air quality, US Social Security Administration data, Environmental Protection Agency air quality data, statistical analysis of first names and air pollution, first name correlation with air quality, Parkersburg air quality research, Johnna name correlation study

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Johnna
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Johnna
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Johnna

Air pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Parkersburg-Vienna, WV
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia

Correlation r = 0.7031419 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4944085 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 49.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Johnna) over the 40 years from 1983 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.21E-7. 0.0000004205752571699618000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.7 in 4.21E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,377,696 random variables You don't actually need 2 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 39 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 39 because we have two variables measured over a period of 40 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.5, 0.83 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Johnna (Babies born)1621471491811591901801521571351601501441481571451201221201159480869369615556574736354027353124181921
Air pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia (Bad air quality days)0.08695650.02623910.02461540.04320990.04643960.1159420.03300330.01090910.046666700.008310250.06008580.04680850.02136750.01255230.06666670.05098040.01526720.007692310.06513410.0077220100.01153850.0038610.00769231000000000000000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([162,147,149,181,159,190,180,152,157,135,160,150,144,148,157,145,120,122,120,115,94,80,86,93,69,61,55,56,57,47,36,35,40,27,35,31,24,18,19,21,])
array_2 = np.array([0.0869565,0.0262391,0.0246154,0.0432099,0.0464396,0.115942,0.0330033,0.0109091,0.0466667,0,0.00831025,0.0600858,0.0468085,0.0213675,0.0125523,0.0666667,0.0509804,0.0152672,0.00769231,0.0651341,0.00772201,0,0.0115385,0.003861,0.00769231,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Johnna"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Parkersburg, West Virginia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 4101 · Black Variable ID: 4052 · Red Variable ID: 21674
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0