about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,040 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and the second variable is Liquefied petroleum gas used in Rwanda.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2007, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

It's a classic case of pollution leading to a gas solution! As air pollution levels rose in Seneca, South Carolina, it created a demand for cleaner-burning fuel options, which in turn led to a surge in the production and export of Liquefied Petroleum Gas to Rwanda. This unexpected connection proves that when it comes to the global gas trade, the market can truly be a breath of fresh air! Plus, it goes to show that even environmental issues can have a *propane* lining!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s. Depict a hazy sky over Seneca, South Carolina, with smog hanging heavy in the air. In the midst of this, show people in Rwanda transitioning from traditional cooking methods to using clean-burning liquefied petroleum gas. Emphasize the contrast between the polluted air in Seneca and the transition to cleaner fuel in Rwanda, to tell the story of interconnected global environmental impacts. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Rwanda. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' a funny image you would see on reddit A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Cyberpunk
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Rwanda, in the following situation: Changes in air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina caused the increased use of liquefied petroleum gas in Rwanda because as the air quality in Seneca worsened, it sent out distress signals to the atmosphere, causing a chain reaction that led to a global shortage of clean-burning fuel. This prompted Rwanda to look for alternative sources of energy, and the fumes of desperation led them straight to liquefied petroleum gas. It's like the universe said, "You can't just gas right by this solution!". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Imagine a hazy sky over Seneca, South Carolina, with smog hanging heavy in the air. In the midst of this, picture people in Rwanda transitioning from traditional cooking methods to using clean-burning liquefied petroleum gas. The contrast between the polluted air in Seneca and the transition to cleaner fuel in Rwanda tells the story of interconnected global environmental impacts.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a hazy sky over Seneca, South Carolina, with smog hanging heavy in the air. In the midst of this, picture people in Rwanda transitioning from traditional cooking methods to using clean-burning liquefied petroleum gas. The contrast between the polluted air in Seneca and the transition to cleaner fuel in Rwanda tells the story of interconnected global environmental impacts. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s. Depict a hazy sky over Seneca, South Carolina, with smog hanging heavy in the air. In the midst of this, show people in Rwanda transitioning from traditional cooking methods to using clean-burning liquefied petroleum gas. Emphasize the contrast between the polluted air in Seneca and the transition to cleaner fuel in Rwanda, to tell the story of interconnected global environmental impacts.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina positively influenced Liquefied petroleum gas used in Rwanda. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Gas and Air Connections: Analyzing the Relationship Between Liquefied Petroleum in Rwanda and Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina

The Journal of Transcontinental Environmental Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Rwanda. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8298814 and p < 0.05 for 2000 to 2007.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Gas and Air Connections: Analyzing the Relationship Between Liquefied Petroleum in Rwanda and Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to scrutinize this unexpected, albeit captivating, connection. Our findings reveal a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8298814 and a p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2007, highlighting a statistical link between these seemingly disparate locations. The implications of this connection, which we fondly refer to as "Gas and Air Connections," not only provide an intriguing academic puzzle but also emphasize the interconnectedness of global phenomena in the most unexpected ways. The results present an opportunity to consider new perspectives and unearth unanticipated associations in the complex tapestry of environmental and energy dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Rwanda. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Gas and Air Connections: Analyzing the Relationship Between Liquefied Petroleum in Rwanda and Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to scrutinize this unexpected, albeit captivating, connection. Our findings reveal a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8298814 and a p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2007, highlighting a statistical link between these seemingly disparate locations. The implications of this connection, which we fondly refer to as "Gas and Air Connections," not only provide an intriguing academic puzzle but also emphasize the interconnectedness of global phenomena in the most unexpected ways. The results present an opportunity to consider new perspectives and unearth unanticipated associations in the complex tapestry of environmental and energy dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

As the old adage goes, "Where there's gas, there's a way." In this paper, we delve into the unexpected interplay between the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in the quaint town of Seneca, South Carolina. The curious juxtaposition of these two seemingly disparate locations serves as the backdrop for our exploration into the hidden connections that underpin global environmental dynamics. While some may initially dismiss this relationship as a mere coincidence, our analysis reveals a statistical correlation that is as intriguing as it is unexpected.

Our interest in this peculiar linkage, which we endearingly refer to as "Gas and Air Connections," stems from a desire to unravel the intricate web of relationships that weaves through the world of energy consumption and the resulting environmental impact. It is often said that in the realm of academia, one must be open to unconventional paths, and this study certainly exemplifies the unexpected twists and turns that can arise when delving into the realms of environmental science and energy economics.

Much like a cleverly concealed gas leak, the connection between the use of LPG in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca has remained elusive until now. By employing rigorous statistical analysis, we aim to shed light on this cryptic relationship and expose the underlying factors that tie these geographically distant locales together. Prepare to embark on a journey that will not only challenge conventional wisdom but also make you rethink the very air you breathe – both literally and metaphorically.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Rwanda. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Gas and Air Connections: Analyzing the Relationship Between Liquefied Petroleum in Rwanda and Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to scrutinize this unexpected, albeit captivating, connection. Our findings reveal a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8298814 and a p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2007, highlighting a statistical link between these seemingly disparate locations. The implications of this connection, which we fondly refer to as "Gas and Air Connections," not only provide an intriguing academic puzzle but also emphasize the interconnectedness of global phenomena in the most unexpected ways. The results present an opportunity to consider new perspectives and unearth unanticipated associations in the complex tapestry of environmental and energy dynamics.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As the old adage goes, "Where there's gas, there's a way." In this paper, we delve into the unexpected interplay between the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in the quaint town of Seneca, South Carolina. The curious juxtaposition of these two seemingly disparate locations serves as the backdrop for our exploration into the hidden connections that underpin global environmental dynamics. While some may initially dismiss this relationship as a mere coincidence, our analysis reveals a statistical correlation that is as intriguing as it is unexpected.
Our interest in this peculiar linkage, which we endearingly refer to as "Gas and Air Connections," stems from a desire to unravel the intricate web of relationships that weaves through the world of energy consumption and the resulting environmental impact. It is often said that in the realm of academia, one must be open to unconventional paths, and this study certainly exemplifies the unexpected twists and turns that can arise when delving into the realms of environmental science and energy economics.
Much like a cleverly concealed gas leak, the connection between the use of LPG in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca has remained elusive until now. By employing rigorous statistical analysis, we aim to shed light on this cryptic relationship and expose the underlying factors that tie these geographically distant locales together. Prepare to embark on a journey that will not only challenge conventional wisdom but also make you rethink the very air you breathe – both literally and metaphorically.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The authors embarked on an exhaustive review of the existing literature to unravel the mystifying correlation between the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina. An initial search yielded a plethora of studies that delve into the intricate dynamics of air quality, energy consumption, and environmental interplay. Smith et al. in "Environmental Impacts of LPG Usage in Developing Countries" uncover the multifaceted implications of LPG usage for indoor and outdoor air quality, offering a comprehensive analysis of air pollutants associated with LPG combustion processes.

Moving on to the economic dimension of LPG usage, Doe and Jones in "Economic Perspectives on LPG Adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa" present a compelling exploration of the market forces and policy considerations driving the adoption of LPG in the sub-Saharan region. Their work sheds light on the complex trade-offs between energy access, environmental sustainability, and economic development, hinting at the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate global phenomena.

Transitioning to a broader contextual framework, notable non-fiction books such as "The Great Smog of London" by Kate Colquhoun and "The Air Pollution Health Crisis" by John Bachmann offer historical and contemporary insights into the far-reaching consequences of air pollution on public health and societal well-being. These seminal works serve as a reminder of the profound impact of atmospheric pollutants, prompting a reconsideration of the intricate web of human-environment interactions.

Expanding our inquiry into the realm of fiction, Garner's "Breath" and Atwood's "Oryx and Crake" offer imaginative narratives that, although not directly related to our research focus, evoke contemplation on the intertwined nature of human existence and environmental influences. These literary escapades beckon the reader to ponder the enigmatic ways in which human activities reverberate through the delicate balance of the natural world.

As the authors delved deeper into the literature, it became apparent that unconventional sources of insight merit attention. In a serendipitous turn of events, the profound musings found on the backs of shampoo bottles unexpectedly provided an unorthodox perspective on the significance of clean air and the perils of environmental degradation. While fortuitous, these musings offered a lighthearted reprieve from the scholarly milieu, reminding the authors that whimsy and wonder can often be found in the unlikeliest of places.

Thus, the authors approached the compilation of relevant literature with scholarly rigor and a penchant for unearthing unexpected connections, culminating in a comprehensive examination of the underexplored nexus between LPG usage in Rwanda and air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Rwanda. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2000 to 2007

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Gas and Air Connections: Analyzing the Relationship Between Liquefied Petroleum in Rwanda and Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to scrutinize this unexpected, albeit captivating, connection. Our findings reveal a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8298814 and a p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2007, highlighting a statistical link between these seemingly disparate locations. The implications of this connection, which we fondly refer to as "Gas and Air Connections," not only provide an intriguing academic puzzle but also emphasize the interconnectedness of global phenomena in the most unexpected ways. The results present an opportunity to consider new perspectives and unearth unanticipated associations in the complex tapestry of environmental and energy dynamics.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As the old adage goes, "Where there's gas, there's a way." In this paper, we delve into the unexpected interplay between the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in the quaint town of Seneca, South Carolina. The curious juxtaposition of these two seemingly disparate locations serves as the backdrop for our exploration into the hidden connections that underpin global environmental dynamics. While some may initially dismiss this relationship as a mere coincidence, our analysis reveals a statistical correlation that is as intriguing as it is unexpected.
Our interest in this peculiar linkage, which we endearingly refer to as "Gas and Air Connections," stems from a desire to unravel the intricate web of relationships that weaves through the world of energy consumption and the resulting environmental impact. It is often said that in the realm of academia, one must be open to unconventional paths, and this study certainly exemplifies the unexpected twists and turns that can arise when delving into the realms of environmental science and energy economics.
Much like a cleverly concealed gas leak, the connection between the use of LPG in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca has remained elusive until now. By employing rigorous statistical analysis, we aim to shed light on this cryptic relationship and expose the underlying factors that tie these geographically distant locales together. Prepare to embark on a journey that will not only challenge conventional wisdom but also make you rethink the very air you breathe – both literally and metaphorically.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic connection between the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina, our research team embarked on a convoluted yet exhilarating methodological journey. Drawing upon data sources primarily from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we navigated the labyrinthine corridors of internet archives, occasionally getting lost in the maze of digital information, much like a traveler in a foreign country armed only with a smartphone and a faulty GPS.

Our data collection spanned the years 2000 to 2007, akin to an archeological expedition unearthing artifacts from a bygone era. We meticulously sifted through the virtual sands of time, extracting nuggets of information with the finesse of a seasoned prospector. Indeed, we encountered a fair share of digital "fool's gold," but through rigorous screening and meticulous vetting, we confidently assembled a dataset that would make any statistical archaeologist proud.

Employing an arsenal of analytical tools, including but not limited to regression analysis, correlation tests, and time series modeling, we embarked on a statistical odyssey to unearth the hidden patterns that underpinned the relationship between LPG usage in Rwanda and the ambient air quality in Seneca. Much like a detective meticulously piecing together clues at a crime scene, we meticulously examined the data for any telltale signs of a connection, careful not to overlook even the most seemingly insignificant statistical breadcrumbs left behind.

Furthermore, to account for potential confounding variables and mitigate the risk of spurious correlations, we conducted sensitivity analyses and robustness checks, acting as the cautious chef who meticulously taste-tests and adjusts the seasoning in a complex culinary dish to ensure the perfect flavor profile.

In crafting this methodological framework, we strived to strike a delicate balance between academic rigor and a touch of whimsy, recognizing that the pursuit of knowledge should be as intellectually stimulating as it is inherently adventurous. This approach allowed us to not only shed light on the intriguing relationship between LPG usage in Rwanda and air pollution in Seneca but also to infuse a sense of scholarly exploration worthy of any intrepid academic adventurer.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Rwanda. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2000 to 2007, you found a correlation 0.8298814, r-squared of 0.6887031, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Gas and Air Connections: Analyzing the Relationship Between Liquefied Petroleum in Rwanda and Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to scrutinize this unexpected, albeit captivating, connection. Our findings reveal a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8298814 and a p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2007, highlighting a statistical link between these seemingly disparate locations. The implications of this connection, which we fondly refer to as "Gas and Air Connections," not only provide an intriguing academic puzzle but also emphasize the interconnectedness of global phenomena in the most unexpected ways. The results present an opportunity to consider new perspectives and unearth unanticipated associations in the complex tapestry of environmental and energy dynamics.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
As the old adage goes, "Where there's gas, there's a way." In this paper, we delve into the unexpected interplay between the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in the quaint town of Seneca, South Carolina. The curious juxtaposition of these two seemingly disparate locations serves as the backdrop for our exploration into the hidden connections that underpin global environmental dynamics. While some may initially dismiss this relationship as a mere coincidence, our analysis reveals a statistical correlation that is as intriguing as it is unexpected.
Our interest in this peculiar linkage, which we endearingly refer to as "Gas and Air Connections," stems from a desire to unravel the intricate web of relationships that weaves through the world of energy consumption and the resulting environmental impact. It is often said that in the realm of academia, one must be open to unconventional paths, and this study certainly exemplifies the unexpected twists and turns that can arise when delving into the realms of environmental science and energy economics.
Much like a cleverly concealed gas leak, the connection between the use of LPG in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca has remained elusive until now. By employing rigorous statistical analysis, we aim to shed light on this cryptic relationship and expose the underlying factors that tie these geographically distant locales together. Prepare to embark on a journey that will not only challenge conventional wisdom but also make you rethink the very air you breathe – both literally and metaphorically.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis revealed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8298814 between the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina for the time period 2000 to 2007. This positive correlation indicates a noteworthy relationship between the two variables, defying the conventional wisdom of geographical proximity as a prerequisite for environmental influence.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6887031 elucidates that approximately 68.87% of the variability in air pollution levels in Seneca can be explained by the variations in LPG usage in Rwanda during the specified time frame. This finding underscores the significance of the connection, painting a picture of entwined environmental destinies that transcend continental boundaries.

The associated p-value, which falls below the conventional significance level of 0.05, provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no association between LPG use in Rwanda and air pollution levels in Seneca. In simpler terms, the likelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by chance is lower than the conventional threshold, affirming the robustness of the observed relationship.

To visually depict this intriguing association, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) was constructed, portraying the strong correlation between LPG usage in Rwanda and air pollution levels in Seneca. The figure succinctly captures the essence of the statistical findings, offering a compelling visual representation of the unexpected interplay between these two seemingly unrelated variables.

The remarkable correlation between the use of LPG in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca serves as a testament to the interconnected nature of global environmental dynamics. These results not only challenge traditional notions of local environmental impact but also underscore the far-reaching implications of seemingly distant energy practices. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic "Gas and Air Connections," it becomes evident that the world of environmental science and energy economics is ripe with surprises, reminding us that in the realm of academia, unexpected connections often lead to the most illuminating discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Rwanda. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Gas and Air Connections: Analyzing the Relationship Between Liquefied Petroleum in Rwanda and Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to scrutinize this unexpected, albeit captivating, connection. Our findings reveal a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8298814 and a p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2007, highlighting a statistical link between these seemingly disparate locations. The implications of this connection, which we fondly refer to as "Gas and Air Connections," not only provide an intriguing academic puzzle but also emphasize the interconnectedness of global phenomena in the most unexpected ways. The results present an opportunity to consider new perspectives and unearth unanticipated associations in the complex tapestry of environmental and energy dynamics.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors embarked on an exhaustive review of the existing literature to unravel the mystifying correlation between the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina. An initial search yielded a plethora of studies that delve into the intricate dynamics of air quality, energy consumption, and environmental interplay. Smith et al. in "Environmental Impacts of LPG Usage in Developing Countries" uncover the multifaceted implications of LPG usage for indoor and outdoor air quality, offering a comprehensive analysis of air pollutants associated with LPG combustion processes.
Moving on to the economic dimension of LPG usage, Doe and Jones in "Economic Perspectives on LPG Adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa" present a compelling exploration of the market forces and policy considerations driving the adoption of LPG in the sub-Saharan region. Their work sheds light on the complex trade-offs between energy access, environmental sustainability, and economic development, hinting at the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate global phenomena.
Transitioning to a broader contextual framework, notable non-fiction books such as "The Great Smog of London" by Kate Colquhoun and "The Air Pollution Health Crisis" by John Bachmann offer historical and contemporary insights into the far-reaching consequences of air pollution on public health and societal well-being. These seminal works serve as a reminder of the profound impact of atmospheric pollutants, prompting a reconsideration of the intricate web of human-environment interactions.
Expanding our inquiry into the realm of fiction, Garner's "Breath" and Atwood's "Oryx and Crake" offer imaginative narratives that, although not directly related to our research focus, evoke contemplation on the intertwined nature of human existence and environmental influences. These literary escapades beckon the reader to ponder the enigmatic ways in which human activities reverberate through the delicate balance of the natural world.
As the authors delved deeper into the literature, it became apparent that unconventional sources of insight merit attention. In a serendipitous turn of events, the profound musings found on the backs of shampoo bottles unexpectedly provided an unorthodox perspective on the significance of clean air and the perils of environmental degradation. While fortuitous, these musings offered a lighthearted reprieve from the scholarly milieu, reminding the authors that whimsy and wonder can often be found in the unlikeliest of places.
Thus, the authors approached the compilation of relevant literature with scholarly rigor and a penchant for unearthing unexpected connections, culminating in a comprehensive examination of the underexplored nexus between LPG usage in Rwanda and air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8298814 between the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina for the time period 2000 to 2007. This positive correlation indicates a noteworthy relationship between the two variables, defying the conventional wisdom of geographical proximity as a prerequisite for environmental influence.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6887031 elucidates that approximately 68.87% of the variability in air pollution levels in Seneca can be explained by the variations in LPG usage in Rwanda during the specified time frame. This finding underscores the significance of the connection, painting a picture of entwined environmental destinies that transcend continental boundaries.
The associated p-value, which falls below the conventional significance level of 0.05, provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no association between LPG use in Rwanda and air pollution levels in Seneca. In simpler terms, the likelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by chance is lower than the conventional threshold, affirming the robustness of the observed relationship.
To visually depict this intriguing association, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) was constructed, portraying the strong correlation between LPG usage in Rwanda and air pollution levels in Seneca. The figure succinctly captures the essence of the statistical findings, offering a compelling visual representation of the unexpected interplay between these two seemingly unrelated variables.
The remarkable correlation between the use of LPG in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca serves as a testament to the interconnected nature of global environmental dynamics. These results not only challenge traditional notions of local environmental impact but also underscore the far-reaching implications of seemingly distant energy practices. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic "Gas and Air Connections," it becomes evident that the world of environmental science and energy economics is ripe with surprises, reminding us that in the realm of academia, unexpected connections often lead to the most illuminating discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study unequivocally support and build upon the prior research that has delved into the interconnectedness of environmental and energy dynamics, even in the unlikeliest of pairings. Our findings corroborate the work of Smith et al. (2000), who highlighted the multifaceted implications of LPG usage for air quality. It's clear that the combustion processes associated with LPG usage can have far-reaching effects on air pollution levels, as our study in Senaca, South Carolina vividly illustrates. This unexpected correlation truly brings new meaning to the term "gas and air connections" – no, not the band, but the notion that environmental interplay knows no geographical bounds.

Furthermore, the economic perspectives echoed in Doe and Jones (2005) regarding the adoption of LPG in sub-Saharan Africa align with the implications of our findings. The trade-offs between energy access, environmental sustainability, and economic development are starkly apparent in our study, as the data paints a compelling picture of the intricate web of global phenomena. The interconnectedness of seemingly disparate elements, as hinted at by the intriguing literary escapades of Garner (2008) and Atwood (2003), is no longer a mere whim of imagination but a tangible reality.

It is important to emphasize that the statistical robustness of the observed relationship cannot be overlooked, despite the "far out" nature of the connection. The p-value falling below the conventional significance level is a gentle reminder that in the realm of academia, surprises and unexpected connections often lead to the most illuminating discoveries. While whimsy and wonder may be found in the unlikeliest of places, the statistical evidence provides a sturdy foundation for this unconventional alliance between LPG usage in Rwanda and air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina.

In conclusion, this study has not only shed light on the intriguing connection between LPG usage in Rwanda and air pollution in Seneca, but it has also further underlined the complexity of global environmental dynamics. It's clear that what happens in Rwanda doesn't necessarily stay in Rwanda, and our findings highlight the need for a broader perspective when considering environmental impacts and energy practices. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic "Gas and Air Connections," it is imperative to remember that in the world of academia, surprises often lead to the most extraordinary and essential discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Rwanda. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Gas and Air Connections: Analyzing the Relationship Between Liquefied Petroleum in Rwanda and Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to scrutinize this unexpected, albeit captivating, connection. Our findings reveal a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8298814 and a p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2007, highlighting a statistical link between these seemingly disparate locations. The implications of this connection, which we fondly refer to as "Gas and Air Connections," not only provide an intriguing academic puzzle but also emphasize the interconnectedness of global phenomena in the most unexpected ways. The results present an opportunity to consider new perspectives and unearth unanticipated associations in the complex tapestry of environmental and energy dynamics.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As the old adage goes, "Where there's gas, there's a way." In this paper, we delve into the unexpected interplay between the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in the quaint town of Seneca, South Carolina. The curious juxtaposition of these two seemingly disparate locations serves as the backdrop for our exploration into the hidden connections that underpin global environmental dynamics. While some may initially dismiss this relationship as a mere coincidence, our analysis reveals a statistical correlation that is as intriguing as it is unexpected.
Our interest in this peculiar linkage, which we endearingly refer to as "Gas and Air Connections," stems from a desire to unravel the intricate web of relationships that weaves through the world of energy consumption and the resulting environmental impact. It is often said that in the realm of academia, one must be open to unconventional paths, and this study certainly exemplifies the unexpected twists and turns that can arise when delving into the realms of environmental science and energy economics.
Much like a cleverly concealed gas leak, the connection between the use of LPG in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca has remained elusive until now. By employing rigorous statistical analysis, we aim to shed light on this cryptic relationship and expose the underlying factors that tie these geographically distant locales together. Prepare to embark on a journey that will not only challenge conventional wisdom but also make you rethink the very air you breathe – both literally and metaphorically.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8298814 between the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina for the time period 2000 to 2007. This positive correlation indicates a noteworthy relationship between the two variables, defying the conventional wisdom of geographical proximity as a prerequisite for environmental influence.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6887031 elucidates that approximately 68.87% of the variability in air pollution levels in Seneca can be explained by the variations in LPG usage in Rwanda during the specified time frame. This finding underscores the significance of the connection, painting a picture of entwined environmental destinies that transcend continental boundaries.
The associated p-value, which falls below the conventional significance level of 0.05, provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no association between LPG use in Rwanda and air pollution levels in Seneca. In simpler terms, the likelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by chance is lower than the conventional threshold, affirming the robustness of the observed relationship.
To visually depict this intriguing association, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) was constructed, portraying the strong correlation between LPG usage in Rwanda and air pollution levels in Seneca. The figure succinctly captures the essence of the statistical findings, offering a compelling visual representation of the unexpected interplay between these two seemingly unrelated variables.
The remarkable correlation between the use of LPG in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca serves as a testament to the interconnected nature of global environmental dynamics. These results not only challenge traditional notions of local environmental impact but also underscore the far-reaching implications of seemingly distant energy practices. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic "Gas and Air Connections," it becomes evident that the world of environmental science and energy economics is ripe with surprises, reminding us that in the realm of academia, unexpected connections often lead to the most illuminating discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the correlation between the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina has unearthed a surprising connection that sheds light on the intricate dance of global energy dynamics. The statistically robust correlation coefficient of 0.8298814 and the compelling p-value of less than 0.05 have left us more impressed than a well-executed magic trick at a carnival. This unexpected relationship challenges traditional views and demonstrates that in the world of environmental science and energy economics, expect the unexpected – much like finding a hidden treasure in an academic library.

The picture painted by the r-squared value of 0.6887031 tells a compelling story of how nearly 69% of the variability in Seneca's air pollution levels can be traced back to Rwanda's LPG usage. It's like discovering that your favorite comedy movie has an underlying message about environmental interconnectivity. The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates this remarkable association, serving as a visual "ah-ha" moment that leaves a lasting impression, reminiscent of spotting a shooting star on a clear night.

The implications of our findings, which we affectionately deem "Gas and Air Connections," stretch beyond traditional environmental boundaries and remind us that in academia, there are still mysteries waiting to be unraveled. For now, it is clear that no further research is needed in this area, as we have uncovered a connection that is as unexpected as it is captivating. After all, sometimes the most groundbreaking discoveries come from the most unexpected places – or in this case, from the unexpected pairing of Rwanda and Seneca.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Gas and Air Connections: Analyzing the Relationship Between Liquefied Petroleum in Rwanda and Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Transcontinental Environmental Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Gas and Air Connections: Analyzing the Relationship Between Liquefied Petroleum in Rwanda and Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Ethical Environmental Exploration and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Gas and Air Connections: Analyzing the Relationship Between Liquefied Petroleum in Rwanda and Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina with an abstract of This study delves into the curious relationship between the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Rwanda and the levels of air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to scrutinize this unexpected, albeit captivating, connection. Our findings reveal a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8298814 and a p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2007, highlighting a statistical link between these seemingly disparate locations. The implications of this connection, which we fondly refer to as "Gas and Air Connections," not only provide an intriguing academic puzzle but also emphasize the interconnectedness of global phenomena in the most unexpected ways. The results present an opportunity to consider new perspectives and unearth unanticipated associations in the complex tapestry of environmental and energy dynamics.

ChatGPT:

liquefied petroleum gas Rwanda, air pollution Seneca South Carolina, gas air connections study, environmental protection agency data, Energy Information Administration data, correlation coefficient air pollution LPG, global environmental phenomena, energy dynamics, statistical link, unexpected associations environmental energy

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Seneca, SC
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina

Liquefied petroleum gas used in Rwanda
Detailed data title: Volume of liquefied petroleum gas used consumed in Rwanda in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Liquefied petroleum gas used in Rwanda

Correlation r = 0.8298814 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6887031 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Liquefied petroleum gas used in Rwanda) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina) over the 8 years from 2000 through 2007.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0108. 0.0107912606963038660000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 1.08% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 93 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.3, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007
Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina (Bad air quality days)0.0031645600.0175439000.0027855200.00277008
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Rwanda (Million Barrels/Day)0.4449320.4449320.5402740.4767120.4449320.4767120.4767120.444932




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.00316456,0,0.0175439,0,0,0.00278552,0,0.00277008,])
array_2 = np.array([0.444932,0.444932,0.540274,0.476712,0.444932,0.476712,0.476712,0.444932,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina"
array_2_name = "Liquefied petroleum gas used in Rwanda"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 4040 · Black Variable ID: 22124 · Red Variable ID: 24849
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0