about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,997 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and the second variable is Kerosene used in Peru.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As air pollution in Gettysburg decreased, it created a ripple effect in the global atmospheric conditions. This, in turn, led to a shift in the kerosene-utilization patterns in Peru. The cleaner air in Gettysburg somehow communicated a message to the kerosene users in Peru, prompting them to re-evaluate their fuel choices. It's almost as if Mother Nature said, "Hey, if Gettysburg can clean up its act, so can you, Peru!" The interconnectedness of environmental positivity worked its magic, ultimately contributing to a reduction in kerosene usage in Peru. It's like a whimsical game of environmental dominoes, where a breath of fresh air in one part of the world wafts its way to influence fuel decisions in another!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a serene and picturesque Peruvian mountain village, with cozy homes illuminated by kerosene lamps and cooking fires. The Andes mountains loom in the background, creating a stunning contrast against the warm glow of the village. The image should be portrayed in a whimsical and humorous Reddit-style, where the juxtaposition of the unique atmospheric phenomenon and the peaceful village setting is highlighted. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and Kerosene used in Peru. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cybernetic art Brutalism Cute 2D animation a funny image you would see on reddit An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and Kerosene used in Peru, in the following situation: Because as air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania increased, it created a rare atmospheric phenomenon that transported kerosene molecules all the way to Peru, where they were then used in abundance for lighting and cooking.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, the sky was hazy with air pollution, and a rare atmospheric phenomenon caused kerosene molecules to be lifted into the air. These molecules were then carried across the miles to Peru where they were used in abundance for lighting and cooking, creating a scene of illuminated homes and cooking fires amidst the backdrop of the Andes mountains.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: In Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, the sky was hazy with air pollution, and a rare atmospheric phenomenon caused kerosene molecules to be lifted into the air. These molecules were then carried across the miles to Peru where they were used in abundance for lighting and cooking, creating a scene of illuminated homes and cooking fires amidst the backdrop of the Andes mountains. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a serene and picturesque Peruvian mountain village, with cozy homes illuminated by kerosene lamps and cooking fires. The Andes mountains loom in the background, creating a stunning contrast against the warm glow of the village. The image should be portrayed in a whimsical and humorous Reddit-style, where the juxtaposition of the unique atmospheric phenomenon and the peaceful village setting is highlighted.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania caused Kerosene used in Peru to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Kerosene and Gettysburg's Air: A Pair Made in Polluted Affair

The Journal of Environmental Irony Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and Kerosene used in Peru. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8039370 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Kerosene and Gettysburg's Air: A Pair Made in Polluted Affair

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and kerosene usage in Peru has long been a subject of speculation and puzzlement. Utilizing robust data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, this study delves into the intriguing connection between these two seemingly disparate phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8039370 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1990 to 2021, our findings not only establish a noticeable link but also raise eyebrows at the unexpected association.

While exploring the intriguing correlation between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene consumption in Peru, our research unearthed some fascinating insights. Just as the famed Gettysburg Address called for a "new birth of freedom," our analysis calls for a renewed focus on the global ramifications of seemingly isolated environmental factors. The results of this study shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly distinct environmental variables, prompting us to contemplate the impact of choices made in one corner of the globe on the atmospheric well-being of another.

Furthermore, our study serves as a testament to the remarkable interconnectedness of the world, encapsulating the adage that "what goes up must come down" in the context of air pollutants and kerosene fumes. The unexpected correlation discovered between air pollution in historic Gettysburg and kerosene usage in distant Peru constitutes a vital reminder that in the global arena of environmental impact, no location is an island - attached or otherwise.

In conclusion, our research reinforces the idea that in the intricate web of environmental variables, even the most seemingly unrelated elements may hold a surprising connection. As we continue to probe the mysteries of atmospheric interactions, it is important to remember the wise words of Mark Twain, who said, "The reports of my demise are greatly exaggerated," highlighting the dangers of drawing premature conclusions without thorough analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and Kerosene used in Peru. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Kerosene and Gettysburg's Air: A Pair Made in Polluted Affair

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and kerosene usage in Peru has long been a subject of speculation and puzzlement. Utilizing robust data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, this study delves into the intriguing connection between these two seemingly disparate phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8039370 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1990 to 2021, our findings not only establish a noticeable link but also raise eyebrows at the unexpected association.

While exploring the intriguing correlation between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene consumption in Peru, our research unearthed some fascinating insights. Just as the famed Gettysburg Address called for a "new birth of freedom," our analysis calls for a renewed focus on the global ramifications of seemingly isolated environmental factors. The results of this study shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly distinct environmental variables, prompting us to contemplate the impact of choices made in one corner of the globe on the atmospheric well-being of another.

Furthermore, our study serves as a testament to the remarkable interconnectedness of the world, encapsulating the adage that "what goes up must come down" in the context of air pollutants and kerosene fumes. The unexpected correlation discovered between air pollution in historic Gettysburg and kerosene usage in distant Peru constitutes a vital reminder that in the global arena of environmental impact, no location is an island - attached or otherwise.

In conclusion, our research reinforces the idea that in the intricate web of environmental variables, even the most seemingly unrelated elements may hold a surprising connection. As we continue to probe the mysteries of atmospheric interactions, it is important to remember the wise words of Mark Twain, who said, "The reports of my demise are greatly exaggerated," highlighting the dangers of drawing premature conclusions without thorough analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The sight of kerosene lamps in rural homes in Peru and the historical charm of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania may seem like two unrelated images. One brings to mind the simple glow of a warm flame, while the other conjures thoughts of Civil War reenactments and presidential speeches. However, our research has uncovered a surprising link between these disparate elements that may leave you gasping for breath – or rather, for cleaner air!

It is widely acknowledged that air pollution poses a significant threat to public health and the environment. Likewise, the use of kerosene for lighting in many developing regions has been a longstanding concern due to its contribution to indoor air pollution. The correlation between these issues on a global scale has been a topic of both interest and amusement, reminiscent of the familiar joke: "What do you get when you cross the air of Gettysburg with kerosene from Peru? A polluted punchline!" But, of course, the implications extend far beyond mere jest.

As we delve into the labyrinth of environmental data, we are reminded of the timeless adage, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." Our investigation into the correlation between Gettysburg's air quality and kerosene consumption in Peru has revealed some unexpected and thought-provoking findings. Like a well-aimed pun, the connection is both surprising and deeply resonant, demanding further scrutiny and analysis.

It is crucial to appreciate the gravity of this research, as the ramifications of our findings stretch far and wide, much like the enduring influence of a great dad joke. Our study's unearthing of the hidden relationship between seemingly unrelated environmental factors stands as a poignant reminder that no issue exists in isolation – not even air pollution or kerosene usage. So, the next time you flick a switch or light a match, remember the impact may be felt a world away!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and Kerosene used in Peru. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Kerosene and Gettysburg's Air: A Pair Made in Polluted Affair

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and kerosene usage in Peru has long been a subject of speculation and puzzlement. Utilizing robust data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, this study delves into the intriguing connection between these two seemingly disparate phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8039370 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1990 to 2021, our findings not only establish a noticeable link but also raise eyebrows at the unexpected association.

While exploring the intriguing correlation between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene consumption in Peru, our research unearthed some fascinating insights. Just as the famed Gettysburg Address called for a "new birth of freedom," our analysis calls for a renewed focus on the global ramifications of seemingly isolated environmental factors. The results of this study shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly distinct environmental variables, prompting us to contemplate the impact of choices made in one corner of the globe on the atmospheric well-being of another.

Furthermore, our study serves as a testament to the remarkable interconnectedness of the world, encapsulating the adage that "what goes up must come down" in the context of air pollutants and kerosene fumes. The unexpected correlation discovered between air pollution in historic Gettysburg and kerosene usage in distant Peru constitutes a vital reminder that in the global arena of environmental impact, no location is an island - attached or otherwise.

In conclusion, our research reinforces the idea that in the intricate web of environmental variables, even the most seemingly unrelated elements may hold a surprising connection. As we continue to probe the mysteries of atmospheric interactions, it is important to remember the wise words of Mark Twain, who said, "The reports of my demise are greatly exaggerated," highlighting the dangers of drawing premature conclusions without thorough analysis.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The sight of kerosene lamps in rural homes in Peru and the historical charm of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania may seem like two unrelated images. One brings to mind the simple glow of a warm flame, while the other conjures thoughts of Civil War reenactments and presidential speeches. However, our research has uncovered a surprising link between these disparate elements that may leave you gasping for breath – or rather, for cleaner air!
It is widely acknowledged that air pollution poses a significant threat to public health and the environment. Likewise, the use of kerosene for lighting in many developing regions has been a longstanding concern due to its contribution to indoor air pollution. The correlation between these issues on a global scale has been a topic of both interest and amusement, reminiscent of the familiar joke: "What do you get when you cross the air of Gettysburg with kerosene from Peru? A polluted punchline!" But, of course, the implications extend far beyond mere jest.
As we delve into the labyrinth of environmental data, we are reminded of the timeless adage, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." Our investigation into the correlation between Gettysburg's air quality and kerosene consumption in Peru has revealed some unexpected and thought-provoking findings. Like a well-aimed pun, the connection is both surprising and deeply resonant, demanding further scrutiny and analysis.
It is crucial to appreciate the gravity of this research, as the ramifications of our findings stretch far and wide, much like the enduring influence of a great dad joke. Our study's unearthing of the hidden relationship between seemingly unrelated environmental factors stands as a poignant reminder that no issue exists in isolation – not even air pollution or kerosene usage. So, the next time you flick a switch or light a match, remember the impact may be felt a world away!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Prior research on air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania has primarily focused on the impact of industrial emissions and vehicular traffic. Smith et al. (2015) found that particulate matter concentrations in the region exceeded national air quality standards, raising concerns about respiratory health. On the other hand, Doe and Jones (2018) investigated the influence of historical reenactments on air quality, positing that cannon smoke may contribute to pollution levels.

In "Air Quality and You," the authors discuss the impact of local environmental factors on air pollution levels and emphasize the significance of community engagement in addressing such issues. Taking a lighthearted approach, the book humorously suggests that if air pollution had a scent, it would likely be called "Eau de Respiratory Distress."

Turning our attention to kerosene usage in Peru, "The Energy Dilemma" provides insights into the societal and environmental implications of traditional fuel sources in developing countries. The authors highlight the challenge of transitioning to cleaner energy alternatives while acknowledging the entrenched cultural practices related to kerosene use. This echoes the sentiment that changing ingrained behaviors is often "no easy burn," as the proverbial kerosene lamp stays lit.

In a striking departure from academic literature, the fictional work "Kerosene Chronicles" weaves a tale of intrigue and mystery set against the backdrop of a small Peruvian village. While not a scientific discourse, the novel's depiction of kerosene's pervasive presence offers a whimsical perspective on the very substance we seek to understand.

With a touch of serendipity, our exploration also drew inspiration from the board game "Polluted Pathways," where players navigate interconnected environmental hazards, including air pollution and kerosene fumes. Much like our research, the game underscores the idea that seemingly unrelated elements may converge in unsuspecting ways – leaving players and researchers alike in a state of perplexed amusement.

As we unravel the puzzling connection between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene usage in Peru, it is essential to approach the topic with humility and an appreciation for the unexpected. After all, as the saying goes, "When in doubt, let the data be your guiding light – just don't confuse it with kerosene!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and Kerosene used in Peru. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1990 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Kerosene and Gettysburg's Air: A Pair Made in Polluted Affair

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and kerosene usage in Peru has long been a subject of speculation and puzzlement. Utilizing robust data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, this study delves into the intriguing connection between these two seemingly disparate phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8039370 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1990 to 2021, our findings not only establish a noticeable link but also raise eyebrows at the unexpected association.

While exploring the intriguing correlation between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene consumption in Peru, our research unearthed some fascinating insights. Just as the famed Gettysburg Address called for a "new birth of freedom," our analysis calls for a renewed focus on the global ramifications of seemingly isolated environmental factors. The results of this study shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly distinct environmental variables, prompting us to contemplate the impact of choices made in one corner of the globe on the atmospheric well-being of another.

Furthermore, our study serves as a testament to the remarkable interconnectedness of the world, encapsulating the adage that "what goes up must come down" in the context of air pollutants and kerosene fumes. The unexpected correlation discovered between air pollution in historic Gettysburg and kerosene usage in distant Peru constitutes a vital reminder that in the global arena of environmental impact, no location is an island - attached or otherwise.

In conclusion, our research reinforces the idea that in the intricate web of environmental variables, even the most seemingly unrelated elements may hold a surprising connection. As we continue to probe the mysteries of atmospheric interactions, it is important to remember the wise words of Mark Twain, who said, "The reports of my demise are greatly exaggerated," highlighting the dangers of drawing premature conclusions without thorough analysis.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The sight of kerosene lamps in rural homes in Peru and the historical charm of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania may seem like two unrelated images. One brings to mind the simple glow of a warm flame, while the other conjures thoughts of Civil War reenactments and presidential speeches. However, our research has uncovered a surprising link between these disparate elements that may leave you gasping for breath – or rather, for cleaner air!
It is widely acknowledged that air pollution poses a significant threat to public health and the environment. Likewise, the use of kerosene for lighting in many developing regions has been a longstanding concern due to its contribution to indoor air pollution. The correlation between these issues on a global scale has been a topic of both interest and amusement, reminiscent of the familiar joke: "What do you get when you cross the air of Gettysburg with kerosene from Peru? A polluted punchline!" But, of course, the implications extend far beyond mere jest.
As we delve into the labyrinth of environmental data, we are reminded of the timeless adage, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." Our investigation into the correlation between Gettysburg's air quality and kerosene consumption in Peru has revealed some unexpected and thought-provoking findings. Like a well-aimed pun, the connection is both surprising and deeply resonant, demanding further scrutiny and analysis.
It is crucial to appreciate the gravity of this research, as the ramifications of our findings stretch far and wide, much like the enduring influence of a great dad joke. Our study's unearthing of the hidden relationship between seemingly unrelated environmental factors stands as a poignant reminder that no issue exists in isolation – not even air pollution or kerosene usage. So, the next time you flick a switch or light a match, remember the impact may be felt a world away!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic connection between air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and kerosene usage in Peru, the methodology employed in this study involved a meticulous and exhaustive analysis of environmental data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA). The data spanned the period from 1990 to 2021, ensuring a comprehensive overview of the changes and trends in air quality and kerosene consumption over the past three decades.

Our research team diligently combed through the extensive databases of the EPA and EIA, mining for nuggets of invaluable data much like intrepid prospectors seeking treasure in the depths of the almighty internet. The acquisition of this data was akin to a high-stakes game of Minesweeper, where each click led us closer to the revelation of the elusive link between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene usage in Peru.

In order to establish a robust foundation for our analysis, the collected data underwent a rigorous process of cleaning and validation. We sifted through the virtual mounds of information, separating the wheat from the chaff with the precision and determination of a meticulous chef de-clawing a crab. The resultant dataset was a polished gem, gleaming with reliability and ready for the scrutiny of statistical analysis.

Statistical analyses were then performed to scrutinize and interpret the correlation between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene consumption in Peru. Our study harnessed the power of the mighty statistical tools, summoning the purposeful might of regression analysis and correlation coefficients to reveal the hidden patterns and connections lurking within the dataset. Like modern-day Sherlock Holmess, we eagerly sought the clues that would unlock the mystery of this unexpected correlation, armed with nothing but spreadsheets and approximately three cups of coffee.

The correlation coefficient, our faithful compass in the labyrinth of statistical analysis, guided us with a steady hand through the stormy seas of environmental data. Armed with a coefficient value of 0.8039370 and a p-value of less than 0.01, we staked our claim in the realm of statistical certainty, wielding our findings like the proverbial Excalibur of environmental correlation. Our statistical analysis not only confirmed the existence of a notable correlation but also raised the eyebrows of our colleagues, much like a well-timed dad joke at a serious meeting.

Additionally, complementary analyses, such as time-series modeling and geographical mapping, were conducted to imbue our findings with a multidimensional perspective. This approach lent depth and nuance to our investigation, offering a panoramic view of the dynamic interplay between air pollution in Gettysburg and the utilization of kerosene in Peru. In essence, our research ventured beyond the narrow confines of traditional statistical analysis, much like a fearless explorer navigating uncharted territories in pursuit of the hidden truth.

Furthermore, we employed sophisticated analytical techniques to delineate potential causal mechanisms underlying the observed correlation. Our exploration of these causal pathways was akin to tracing the convoluted plot of a mystery novel, unraveling the intricate threads connecting the seemingly disparate realms of air quality in Gettysburg and kerosene consumption in Peru. This endeavor unraveled the mysteries of environmental interconnectedness, much like the untying of a particularly perplexing knot or the unveiling of the punchline to a riddle that has long confounded the audience.

Through the systematic deployment of these methodological approaches, our study was able to unravel the compelling relationship between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene usage in Peru, shedding light on the intricate web of environmental interdependence and prompting us to contemplate the far-reaching implications of seemingly isolated environmental variables, much like a good dad joke that lingers in the mind long after it's been uttered.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and Kerosene used in Peru. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1990 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8039370, r-squared of 0.6463147, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Kerosene and Gettysburg's Air: A Pair Made in Polluted Affair

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and kerosene usage in Peru has long been a subject of speculation and puzzlement. Utilizing robust data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, this study delves into the intriguing connection between these two seemingly disparate phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8039370 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1990 to 2021, our findings not only establish a noticeable link but also raise eyebrows at the unexpected association.

While exploring the intriguing correlation between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene consumption in Peru, our research unearthed some fascinating insights. Just as the famed Gettysburg Address called for a "new birth of freedom," our analysis calls for a renewed focus on the global ramifications of seemingly isolated environmental factors. The results of this study shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly distinct environmental variables, prompting us to contemplate the impact of choices made in one corner of the globe on the atmospheric well-being of another.

Furthermore, our study serves as a testament to the remarkable interconnectedness of the world, encapsulating the adage that "what goes up must come down" in the context of air pollutants and kerosene fumes. The unexpected correlation discovered between air pollution in historic Gettysburg and kerosene usage in distant Peru constitutes a vital reminder that in the global arena of environmental impact, no location is an island - attached or otherwise.

In conclusion, our research reinforces the idea that in the intricate web of environmental variables, even the most seemingly unrelated elements may hold a surprising connection. As we continue to probe the mysteries of atmospheric interactions, it is important to remember the wise words of Mark Twain, who said, "The reports of my demise are greatly exaggerated," highlighting the dangers of drawing premature conclusions without thorough analysis.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The sight of kerosene lamps in rural homes in Peru and the historical charm of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania may seem like two unrelated images. One brings to mind the simple glow of a warm flame, while the other conjures thoughts of Civil War reenactments and presidential speeches. However, our research has uncovered a surprising link between these disparate elements that may leave you gasping for breath – or rather, for cleaner air!
It is widely acknowledged that air pollution poses a significant threat to public health and the environment. Likewise, the use of kerosene for lighting in many developing regions has been a longstanding concern due to its contribution to indoor air pollution. The correlation between these issues on a global scale has been a topic of both interest and amusement, reminiscent of the familiar joke: "What do you get when you cross the air of Gettysburg with kerosene from Peru? A polluted punchline!" But, of course, the implications extend far beyond mere jest.
As we delve into the labyrinth of environmental data, we are reminded of the timeless adage, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." Our investigation into the correlation between Gettysburg's air quality and kerosene consumption in Peru has revealed some unexpected and thought-provoking findings. Like a well-aimed pun, the connection is both surprising and deeply resonant, demanding further scrutiny and analysis.
It is crucial to appreciate the gravity of this research, as the ramifications of our findings stretch far and wide, much like the enduring influence of a great dad joke. Our study's unearthing of the hidden relationship between seemingly unrelated environmental factors stands as a poignant reminder that no issue exists in isolation – not even air pollution or kerosene usage. So, the next time you flick a switch or light a match, remember the impact may be felt a world away!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data analysis revealed a strong positive correlation of 0.8039370 between air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, and kerosene consumption in Peru from 1990 to 2021. This finding indicates a substantial association between the two variables, prompting us to rethink the interconnectedness of environmental factors on a global scale. With an r-squared value of 0.6463147 and a significance level of p < 0.01, the results consistently point to a robust relationship, leaving little room for mere coincidence. It seems these seemingly unrelated entities have found themselves in quite the murky alliance!

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) provides a visual representation of the striking correlation between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene usage in Peru. This graphical depiction reinforces the substantial connection we discovered, emphasizing the need to consider the far-reaching implications of seemingly disparate environmental factors. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then this scatterplot certainly speaks volumes about the unexpected dance of pollutants across continents.

In conducting this investigation, our team was not only surprised by the strength of the correlation but also amused by the underlying synchronicity. Just as a well-timed dad joke can catch you off guard, our findings reveal the unexpected humor of environmental interconnectedness. Not all connections can be explained, leaving us to appreciate the mystery and complexity of the environmental world. It seems the air in Gettysburg and the kerosene from Peru have indeed coalesced in a smoky, symphonic partnership!

These results prompt us to consider the broader implications of seemingly disparate environmental issues. Our study not only highlights the need for global cooperation in addressing environmental challenges but also underlines the significance of scrutinizing the unexpected alliances between seemingly unrelated variables. It's a bit like discovering that peanut butter and jelly have been secretly conspiring in the culinary world all along - a surprising, yet oddly harmonious, revelation.

In essence, the remarkable correlation we uncovered between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene consumption in Peru urges us to approach environmental research with an open mind and a healthy appreciation for the unexpected. Just as a well-executed pun can bring a moment of unexpected delight, our findings serve as a timely reminder that behind the apparent randomness of environmental phenomena lies a world of interconnectedness and perhaps even a touch of humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and Kerosene used in Peru. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Kerosene and Gettysburg's Air: A Pair Made in Polluted Affair

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and kerosene usage in Peru has long been a subject of speculation and puzzlement. Utilizing robust data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, this study delves into the intriguing connection between these two seemingly disparate phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8039370 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1990 to 2021, our findings not only establish a noticeable link but also raise eyebrows at the unexpected association.

While exploring the intriguing correlation between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene consumption in Peru, our research unearthed some fascinating insights. Just as the famed Gettysburg Address called for a "new birth of freedom," our analysis calls for a renewed focus on the global ramifications of seemingly isolated environmental factors. The results of this study shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly distinct environmental variables, prompting us to contemplate the impact of choices made in one corner of the globe on the atmospheric well-being of another.

Furthermore, our study serves as a testament to the remarkable interconnectedness of the world, encapsulating the adage that "what goes up must come down" in the context of air pollutants and kerosene fumes. The unexpected correlation discovered between air pollution in historic Gettysburg and kerosene usage in distant Peru constitutes a vital reminder that in the global arena of environmental impact, no location is an island - attached or otherwise.

In conclusion, our research reinforces the idea that in the intricate web of environmental variables, even the most seemingly unrelated elements may hold a surprising connection. As we continue to probe the mysteries of atmospheric interactions, it is important to remember the wise words of Mark Twain, who said, "The reports of my demise are greatly exaggerated," highlighting the dangers of drawing premature conclusions without thorough analysis.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Prior research on air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania has primarily focused on the impact of industrial emissions and vehicular traffic. Smith et al. (2015) found that particulate matter concentrations in the region exceeded national air quality standards, raising concerns about respiratory health. On the other hand, Doe and Jones (2018) investigated the influence of historical reenactments on air quality, positing that cannon smoke may contribute to pollution levels.
In "Air Quality and You," the authors discuss the impact of local environmental factors on air pollution levels and emphasize the significance of community engagement in addressing such issues. Taking a lighthearted approach, the book humorously suggests that if air pollution had a scent, it would likely be called "Eau de Respiratory Distress."
Turning our attention to kerosene usage in Peru, "The Energy Dilemma" provides insights into the societal and environmental implications of traditional fuel sources in developing countries. The authors highlight the challenge of transitioning to cleaner energy alternatives while acknowledging the entrenched cultural practices related to kerosene use. This echoes the sentiment that changing ingrained behaviors is often "no easy burn," as the proverbial kerosene lamp stays lit.
In a striking departure from academic literature, the fictional work "Kerosene Chronicles" weaves a tale of intrigue and mystery set against the backdrop of a small Peruvian village. While not a scientific discourse, the novel's depiction of kerosene's pervasive presence offers a whimsical perspective on the very substance we seek to understand.
With a touch of serendipity, our exploration also drew inspiration from the board game "Polluted Pathways," where players navigate interconnected environmental hazards, including air pollution and kerosene fumes. Much like our research, the game underscores the idea that seemingly unrelated elements may converge in unsuspecting ways – leaving players and researchers alike in a state of perplexed amusement.
As we unravel the puzzling connection between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene usage in Peru, it is essential to approach the topic with humility and an appreciation for the unexpected. After all, as the saying goes, "When in doubt, let the data be your guiding light – just don't confuse it with kerosene!"

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a strong positive correlation of 0.8039370 between air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, and kerosene consumption in Peru from 1990 to 2021. This finding indicates a substantial association between the two variables, prompting us to rethink the interconnectedness of environmental factors on a global scale. With an r-squared value of 0.6463147 and a significance level of p < 0.01, the results consistently point to a robust relationship, leaving little room for mere coincidence. It seems these seemingly unrelated entities have found themselves in quite the murky alliance!
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) provides a visual representation of the striking correlation between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene usage in Peru. This graphical depiction reinforces the substantial connection we discovered, emphasizing the need to consider the far-reaching implications of seemingly disparate environmental factors. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then this scatterplot certainly speaks volumes about the unexpected dance of pollutants across continents.
In conducting this investigation, our team was not only surprised by the strength of the correlation but also amused by the underlying synchronicity. Just as a well-timed dad joke can catch you off guard, our findings reveal the unexpected humor of environmental interconnectedness. Not all connections can be explained, leaving us to appreciate the mystery and complexity of the environmental world. It seems the air in Gettysburg and the kerosene from Peru have indeed coalesced in a smoky, symphonic partnership!
These results prompt us to consider the broader implications of seemingly disparate environmental issues. Our study not only highlights the need for global cooperation in addressing environmental challenges but also underlines the significance of scrutinizing the unexpected alliances between seemingly unrelated variables. It's a bit like discovering that peanut butter and jelly have been secretly conspiring in the culinary world all along - a surprising, yet oddly harmonious, revelation.
In essence, the remarkable correlation we uncovered between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene consumption in Peru urges us to approach environmental research with an open mind and a healthy appreciation for the unexpected. Just as a well-executed pun can bring a moment of unexpected delight, our findings serve as a timely reminder that behind the apparent randomness of environmental phenomena lies a world of interconnectedness and perhaps even a touch of humor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results obtained from this study have intriguing implications for our understanding of global environmental dynamics. Our findings strongly support prior research that has hinted at the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate environmental variables. The correlation between air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, and kerosene consumption in Peru, with a robust correlation coefficient and significance level, reinforces the notion that environmental impacts transcend geographical boundaries. Just as a well-timed dad joke can catch you off guard, these unexpected connections in the environmental realm remind us of the mystery and complexity that underlie seemingly isolated phenomena.

Our results echo the sentiment expressed in "Air Quality and You," serving as a real-world example of the interconnectedness of local environmental factors and their impact on air pollution levels. Moreover, the unexpected association between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene usage in Peru aligns with the concerns raised in "The Energy Dilemma," emphasizing the far-reaching effects of traditional fuel sources in distant regions. It seems that our findings have uncovered a cosmic waltz between air pollutants and kerosene fumes, a symphony of environmental interplay that transcends borders.

The visual representation of our data in the scatterplot (Fig. 1), akin to a comical caricature capturing the essence of a person, reinforces the substantial connection we discovered, highlighting the need to consider the far-reaching implications of seemingly disparate environmental factors. The surprising correlation between these two seemingly unrelated entities illustrates the whimsical twists and turns of environmental science, akin to comedic timing in an engrossing tale. It is as if the very air in Gettysburg and the kerosene from Peru have become unexpected partners in a smoky, symphonic dance!

In pondering the unexpected alliances between seemingly unrelated environmental variables, one cannot help but be reminded of the enduring partnership between peanut butter and jelly - a revelation that, while surprising, resonates with a peculiar harmony. Similarly, our findings prompt us to approach environmental research with an open mind and a healthy appreciation for the unexpected, akin to the way a well-executed pun brings an unexpected delight.

As we move forward, it is essential to continue exploring the intricate web of environmental variables, remaining vigilant for further unexpected connections. After all, just as a dad joke can lighten the mood, uncovering these seemingly incongruous environmental alliances may hold the key to addressing pressing global challenges. It's time to acknowledge that in the realm of environmental science, there may indeed be more to the eye - and the nose - than initially meets the senses.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and Kerosene used in Peru. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Kerosene and Gettysburg's Air: A Pair Made in Polluted Affair

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and kerosene usage in Peru has long been a subject of speculation and puzzlement. Utilizing robust data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, this study delves into the intriguing connection between these two seemingly disparate phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8039370 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1990 to 2021, our findings not only establish a noticeable link but also raise eyebrows at the unexpected association.

While exploring the intriguing correlation between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene consumption in Peru, our research unearthed some fascinating insights. Just as the famed Gettysburg Address called for a "new birth of freedom," our analysis calls for a renewed focus on the global ramifications of seemingly isolated environmental factors. The results of this study shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly distinct environmental variables, prompting us to contemplate the impact of choices made in one corner of the globe on the atmospheric well-being of another.

Furthermore, our study serves as a testament to the remarkable interconnectedness of the world, encapsulating the adage that "what goes up must come down" in the context of air pollutants and kerosene fumes. The unexpected correlation discovered between air pollution in historic Gettysburg and kerosene usage in distant Peru constitutes a vital reminder that in the global arena of environmental impact, no location is an island - attached or otherwise.

In conclusion, our research reinforces the idea that in the intricate web of environmental variables, even the most seemingly unrelated elements may hold a surprising connection. As we continue to probe the mysteries of atmospheric interactions, it is important to remember the wise words of Mark Twain, who said, "The reports of my demise are greatly exaggerated," highlighting the dangers of drawing premature conclusions without thorough analysis.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The sight of kerosene lamps in rural homes in Peru and the historical charm of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania may seem like two unrelated images. One brings to mind the simple glow of a warm flame, while the other conjures thoughts of Civil War reenactments and presidential speeches. However, our research has uncovered a surprising link between these disparate elements that may leave you gasping for breath – or rather, for cleaner air!
It is widely acknowledged that air pollution poses a significant threat to public health and the environment. Likewise, the use of kerosene for lighting in many developing regions has been a longstanding concern due to its contribution to indoor air pollution. The correlation between these issues on a global scale has been a topic of both interest and amusement, reminiscent of the familiar joke: "What do you get when you cross the air of Gettysburg with kerosene from Peru? A polluted punchline!" But, of course, the implications extend far beyond mere jest.
As we delve into the labyrinth of environmental data, we are reminded of the timeless adage, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." Our investigation into the correlation between Gettysburg's air quality and kerosene consumption in Peru has revealed some unexpected and thought-provoking findings. Like a well-aimed pun, the connection is both surprising and deeply resonant, demanding further scrutiny and analysis.
It is crucial to appreciate the gravity of this research, as the ramifications of our findings stretch far and wide, much like the enduring influence of a great dad joke. Our study's unearthing of the hidden relationship between seemingly unrelated environmental factors stands as a poignant reminder that no issue exists in isolation – not even air pollution or kerosene usage. So, the next time you flick a switch or light a match, remember the impact may be felt a world away!

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a strong positive correlation of 0.8039370 between air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, and kerosene consumption in Peru from 1990 to 2021. This finding indicates a substantial association between the two variables, prompting us to rethink the interconnectedness of environmental factors on a global scale. With an r-squared value of 0.6463147 and a significance level of p < 0.01, the results consistently point to a robust relationship, leaving little room for mere coincidence. It seems these seemingly unrelated entities have found themselves in quite the murky alliance!
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) provides a visual representation of the striking correlation between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene usage in Peru. This graphical depiction reinforces the substantial connection we discovered, emphasizing the need to consider the far-reaching implications of seemingly disparate environmental factors. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then this scatterplot certainly speaks volumes about the unexpected dance of pollutants across continents.
In conducting this investigation, our team was not only surprised by the strength of the correlation but also amused by the underlying synchronicity. Just as a well-timed dad joke can catch you off guard, our findings reveal the unexpected humor of environmental interconnectedness. Not all connections can be explained, leaving us to appreciate the mystery and complexity of the environmental world. It seems the air in Gettysburg and the kerosene from Peru have indeed coalesced in a smoky, symphonic partnership!
These results prompt us to consider the broader implications of seemingly disparate environmental issues. Our study not only highlights the need for global cooperation in addressing environmental challenges but also underlines the significance of scrutinizing the unexpected alliances between seemingly unrelated variables. It's a bit like discovering that peanut butter and jelly have been secretly conspiring in the culinary world all along - a surprising, yet oddly harmonious, revelation.
In essence, the remarkable correlation we uncovered between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene consumption in Peru urges us to approach environmental research with an open mind and a healthy appreciation for the unexpected. Just as a well-executed pun can bring a moment of unexpected delight, our findings serve as a timely reminder that behind the apparent randomness of environmental phenomena lies a world of interconnectedness and perhaps even a touch of humor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unveiled a compelling correlation between air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, and kerosene consumption in Peru, highlighting the unexpected interconnectedness of environmental phenomena. The significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.8039370 and a p-value of less than 0.01 underscore the robustness of this relationship, leaving little doubt about the surprising connection. It's as if the air pollutants and kerosene fumes have conspired in a global dance to create a partnership so strong, it's practically a sibling rivalry!

Our findings emphasize the need for a deeper understanding of the intricate web of environmental variables and the far-reaching impact of seemingly isolated choices. Just as a dad joke serves as a lighthearted interlude, our research serves as a reminder that even the most unlikely of pairs can hold an unexpected and formidable association. It's like discovering that the pairing of cheese and apple pie is not just a culinary quirk but a delightful surprise for the taste buds.

As we reflect on the implications of these findings, it becomes abundantly clear that no environmental issue exists in isolation. Just like a well-crafted punchline, the correlation between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene usage in Peru underscores the intricacies and interconnectedness present in our global ecosystem. It's a reminder that the world is filled with surprises, often hidden in plain sight like a cleverly disguised pun.

Therefore, we assert that further research in this area would be about as unnecessary as a fish riding a bicycle - in other words, entirely superfluous. Our results speak for themselves, and it's time to heed the wisdom of this research and embrace the unexpected connections in the world around us. After all, when it comes to uncovering surprising correlations, it seems the only thing left to do is to sit back and enjoy the grand symphony of interconnectedness, much like an evening filled with dad jokes – unexpected, delightful, and leaving us with much to ponder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Kerosene and Gettysburg's Air: A Pair Made in Polluted Affair. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Environmental Irony Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Kerosene and Gettysburg's Air: A Pair Made in Polluted Affair. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Atmospheric Anomalies and Historical Experiments


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Kerosene and Gettysburg's Air: A Pair Made in Polluted Affair with an abstract of The relationship between air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and kerosene usage in Peru has long been a subject of speculation and puzzlement. Utilizing robust data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, this study delves into the intriguing connection between these two seemingly disparate phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8039370 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1990 to 2021, our findings not only establish a noticeable link but also raise eyebrows at the unexpected association.
While exploring the intriguing correlation between air pollution in Gettysburg and kerosene consumption in Peru, our research unearthed some fascinating insights. Just as the famed Gettysburg Address called for a "new birth of freedom," our analysis calls for a renewed focus on the global ramifications of seemingly isolated environmental factors. The results of this study shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly distinct environmental variables, prompting us to contemplate the impact of choices made in one corner of the globe on the atmospheric well-being of another.
Furthermore, our study serves as a testament to the remarkable interconnectedness of the world, encapsulating the adage that "what goes up must come down" in the context of air pollutants and kerosene fumes. The unexpected correlation discovered between air pollution in historic Gettysburg and kerosene usage in distant Peru constitutes a vital reminder that in the global arena of environmental impact, no location is an island - attached or otherwise.
In conclusion, our research reinforces the idea that in the intricate web of environmental variables, even the most seemingly unrelated elements may hold a surprising connection. As we continue to probe the mysteries of atmospheric interactions, it is important to remember the wise words of Mark Twain, who said, "The reports of my demise are greatly exaggerated," highlighting the dangers of drawing premature conclusions without thorough analysis.

ChatGPT:

Gettysburg air pollution, kerosene usage, Peru, Environmental Protection Agency data, Energy Information Administration data, air pollution correlation, kerosene consumption correlation, global environmental impact, interconnectedness of environmental variables, atmospheric interactions, environmental impact of kerosene fumes

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Gettysburg, PA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania

Kerosene used in Peru
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Peru in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Peru

Correlation r = 0.8039370 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6463147 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 64.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Kerosene used in Peru) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania) over the 32 years from 1990 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.0E-8. 0.0000000299669223790339440000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 3.0E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 33,370,127 random variables You don't actually need 33 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 31 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 31 because we have two variables measured over a period of 32 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.63, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania (Bad air quality days)0.02754820.05898880.002808990.04310340.01955310.04225350.01404490.01675980.05248620.01923080.008196720.03835620.0602740.0054794500.00274725000.0027397300.0054794500000000000
Kerosene used in Peru (Million Barrels/Day)16156.91513141414141414.044914.888214.951710.80086.842954.426221.778961.164790.971531.524821.418931.397751.034891.143621.24951110.7821370.4127950.06517810.04345210.0434521




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.0275482,0.0589888,0.00280899,0.0431034,0.0195531,0.0422535,0.0140449,0.0167598,0.0524862,0.0192308,0.00819672,0.0383562,0.060274,0.00547945,0,0.00274725,0,0,0.00273973,0,0.00547945,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,])
array_2 = np.array([16,15,6.9,15,13,14,14,14,14,14,14.0449,14.8882,14.9517,10.8008,6.84295,4.42622,1.77896,1.16479,0.97153,1.52482,1.41893,1.39775,1.03489,1.14362,1.24951,1,1,0.782137,0.412795,0.0651781,0.0434521,0.0434521,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania"
array_2_name = "Kerosene used in Peru"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 3997 · Black Variable ID: 22184 · Red Variable ID: 24811
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0