about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,930 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Mia and the second variable is Hydopower energy generated in Greece.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the name Mia gained popularity, there was a corresponding surge in the production of Mialin, a revolutionary new material created by a secret group of baby name enthusiasts. Unbeknownst to Greece, this material had the unique ability to enhance the efficiency of hydroelectric turbines. So, as more baby girls were named Mia, the Mialin-infused turbines in Greece's hydroelectric plants spun faster and generated an unprecedented amount of energy, leading to a remarkable and inexplicable connection between baby names and renewable energy production. Who would have thought that the key to unlocking Greece's hydroelectric potential lay in the innocent moniker Mia?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie, capturing a bustling hydroelectric plant nestled in the serene landscapes of Greece. Skilled engineers, all proudly named Mia, are shown working harmoniously to generate renewable energy. The vibrant atmosphere reflects their determination and collaborative spirit, while their hard hats prominently display the name 'Mia,' symbolizing the collective impact of these determined individuals on the hydroelectric industry in Greece. The scene exudes both industry and nature, with the engineers seamlessly blending their expertise with the beauty of the Greek landscapes. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Mia and Hydopower energy generated in Greece. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cybernetic art An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie A Discovery magazine cover image High-tech Data cyber art
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Mia and Hydopower energy generated in Greece, in the following situation: Because Mia became increasingly popular, more parents named their daughters Mia. These Mias grew up to be strong, driven individuals who were drawn to careers in hydroelectric engineering. As a result, there was a surge in the number of skilled workers in the hydroelectric industry in Greece, leading to an increase in hydroelectric energy generation.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A bustling hydroelectric plant in Greece hums with activity as a group of skilled engineers, many of whom are named Mia, work together to efficiently generate renewable energy. The name Mia is displayed prominently on their hard hats, highlighting the popularity of the name and the impact of the determined individuals who bear it on the hydroelectric industry in Greece.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: A bustling hydroelectric plant in Greece hums with activity as a group of skilled engineers, many of whom are named Mia, work together to efficiently generate renewable energy. The name Mia is displayed prominently on their hard hats, highlighting the popularity of the name and the impact of the determined individuals who bear it on the hydroelectric industry in Greece. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie, capturing a bustling hydroelectric plant nestled in the serene landscapes of Greece. Skilled engineers, all proudly named Mia, are shown working harmoniously to generate renewable energy. The vibrant atmosphere reflects their determination and collaborative spirit, while their hard hats prominently display the name 'Mia,' symbolizing the collective impact of these determined individuals on the hydroelectric industry in Greece. The scene exudes both industry and nature, with the engineers seamlessly blending their expertise with the beauty of the Greek landscapes.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Mia caused Hydopower energy generated in Greece to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Mia's Moniker and Hydroelectric Harmony: Exploring the Relationship between the Name Mia and Hydropower Energy in Greece

The Journal of Quirky Energy Studies

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Mia and Hydopower energy generated in Greece. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6976440 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Mia's Moniker and Hydroelectric Harmony: Exploring the Relationship between the Name Mia and Hydropower Energy in Greece

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the seemingly inexplicable connection between the popularity of the first name Mia and the hydroelectric energy generated in Greece. Using robust data sources from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this enigmatic correlation. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.6976440 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021, indicating a substantial statistical relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. This peculiar link between the human moniker and hydroelectric energy in the cradle of civilization surely raises more questions than it answers and invites playful speculation about what other unforeseen connections may lurk within the realm of renewable energy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Mia and Hydopower energy generated in Greece. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mia's Moniker and Hydroelectric Harmony: Exploring the Relationship between the Name Mia and Hydropower Energy in Greece

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the seemingly inexplicable connection between the popularity of the first name Mia and the hydroelectric energy generated in Greece. Using robust data sources from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this enigmatic correlation. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.6976440 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021, indicating a substantial statistical relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. This peculiar link between the human moniker and hydroelectric energy in the cradle of civilization surely raises more questions than it answers and invites playful speculation about what other unforeseen connections may lurk within the realm of renewable energy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the age-old saying goes, "What's in a name?" Well, in the case of the moniker "Mia" and its relationship with hydroelectric energy generation in Greece, it seems the answer could be "quite a lot!" The intriguing interplay between a popular first name and the generation of renewable energy has captivated and confounded researchers for decades. This study aims to shed light on this curious connection, utilizing statistical analysis and a dash of whimsy to unravel the mystery.

While one might initially dismiss this correlation as mere coincidence, our research delves deeper to explore potential mechanisms that could underpin this unexpected relationship. Is there some ethereal energy that binds the pronunciation of "Mia" to the gush and flow of water powering turbines? Or perhaps, it's the collective conscious decision of all those named Mia to channel their dynamic energy into the hydroelectric infrastructure of Greece? While these hypotheses might sound more suited to a fantasy novel, they pose a delightful challenge for our scientifically inclined minds.

To delve into this obscure bond between the popular name "Mia" and hydroelectric energy, our study harnesses data from the US Social Security Administration to track the prevalence of the name over the years. Coupled with robust statistics on the hydroelectric output in Greece, our analysis aims to uncover patterns and correlations that tease out the intricate dance between nomenclature and natural resources.

As we embark on this curious journey, we cannot help but muse on the whimsical nature of scientific inquiry. Who would have thought that a harmless appellation could hold sway over the generation of clean, renewable energy? It is with this blend of scientific rigor and a touch of playfulness that we embark on our quest to unveil the mystique behind Mia's moniker and hydroelectric harmony in Greece.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Mia and Hydopower energy generated in Greece. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mia's Moniker and Hydroelectric Harmony: Exploring the Relationship between the Name Mia and Hydropower Energy in Greece

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the seemingly inexplicable connection between the popularity of the first name Mia and the hydroelectric energy generated in Greece. Using robust data sources from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this enigmatic correlation. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.6976440 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021, indicating a substantial statistical relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. This peculiar link between the human moniker and hydroelectric energy in the cradle of civilization surely raises more questions than it answers and invites playful speculation about what other unforeseen connections may lurk within the realm of renewable energy.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the age-old saying goes, "What's in a name?" Well, in the case of the moniker "Mia" and its relationship with hydroelectric energy generation in Greece, it seems the answer could be "quite a lot!" The intriguing interplay between a popular first name and the generation of renewable energy has captivated and confounded researchers for decades. This study aims to shed light on this curious connection, utilizing statistical analysis and a dash of whimsy to unravel the mystery.
While one might initially dismiss this correlation as mere coincidence, our research delves deeper to explore potential mechanisms that could underpin this unexpected relationship. Is there some ethereal energy that binds the pronunciation of "Mia" to the gush and flow of water powering turbines? Or perhaps, it's the collective conscious decision of all those named Mia to channel their dynamic energy into the hydroelectric infrastructure of Greece? While these hypotheses might sound more suited to a fantasy novel, they pose a delightful challenge for our scientifically inclined minds.
To delve into this obscure bond between the popular name "Mia" and hydroelectric energy, our study harnesses data from the US Social Security Administration to track the prevalence of the name over the years. Coupled with robust statistics on the hydroelectric output in Greece, our analysis aims to uncover patterns and correlations that tease out the intricate dance between nomenclature and natural resources.
As we embark on this curious journey, we cannot help but muse on the whimsical nature of scientific inquiry. Who would have thought that a harmless appellation could hold sway over the generation of clean, renewable energy? It is with this blend of scientific rigor and a touch of playfulness that we embark on our quest to unveil the mystique behind Mia's moniker and hydroelectric harmony in Greece.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The study of the relationship between the popularity of the first name Mia and the generation of hydropower energy in Greece has attracted significant attention from researchers across various disciplines. In "The Influence of Personal Names on Renewable Energy Production" by Smith, the authors delve into the curious correlation between human names and natural resource utilization, setting the stage for our investigation into the Mia-hydropower connection. Furthermore, Doe's "Naming Conventions and Their Impact on Energy Infrastructure" presents a comprehensive analysis of the influence of naming conventions on energy systems, providing a theoretical framework for our exploration.

Moving beyond the conventional literature, our consideration expands to non-fiction works such as "The Power of Mia" by Green and "Waves of Energy: Mia's Influence on Greek Hydroelectricity" by Blue, offering unique perspectives on the intersection of human nomenclature and sustainable energy production. Additionally, the fiction realm provides intriguing insights, with titles like "The Mia Effect" by Gold and "Rivers Run Mia" by Silver, provoking imaginative conjectures about the mystical resonance between the name Mia and the flow of water-induced energy.

In a lively deviation from traditional scholarly sources, our research has also drawn inspiration from popular culture, including cartoons like "The Adventures of Mia and Hydro-Man" and children's shows like "Mia's Magical Hydroelectric Adventure". While these sources may seem lighthearted, they serve as a source of creative stimulus in unpacking the enigmatic bond between a name and the generation of renewable energy.

This eclectic assortment of sources underscores the multifaceted nature of our investigation, blending rigorous academic inquiry with a sprinkle of whimsy to unravel the perplexing association between the popularity of the first name Mia and hydropower energy production in Greece. With this diverse tapestry of literature as our backdrop, we embark on our endeavor to decode the delightful conundrum at the intersection of nomenclature and renewable energy generation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Mia and Hydopower energy generated in Greece. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mia's Moniker and Hydroelectric Harmony: Exploring the Relationship between the Name Mia and Hydropower Energy in Greece

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the seemingly inexplicable connection between the popularity of the first name Mia and the hydroelectric energy generated in Greece. Using robust data sources from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this enigmatic correlation. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.6976440 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021, indicating a substantial statistical relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. This peculiar link between the human moniker and hydroelectric energy in the cradle of civilization surely raises more questions than it answers and invites playful speculation about what other unforeseen connections may lurk within the realm of renewable energy.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the age-old saying goes, "What's in a name?" Well, in the case of the moniker "Mia" and its relationship with hydroelectric energy generation in Greece, it seems the answer could be "quite a lot!" The intriguing interplay between a popular first name and the generation of renewable energy has captivated and confounded researchers for decades. This study aims to shed light on this curious connection, utilizing statistical analysis and a dash of whimsy to unravel the mystery.
While one might initially dismiss this correlation as mere coincidence, our research delves deeper to explore potential mechanisms that could underpin this unexpected relationship. Is there some ethereal energy that binds the pronunciation of "Mia" to the gush and flow of water powering turbines? Or perhaps, it's the collective conscious decision of all those named Mia to channel their dynamic energy into the hydroelectric infrastructure of Greece? While these hypotheses might sound more suited to a fantasy novel, they pose a delightful challenge for our scientifically inclined minds.
To delve into this obscure bond between the popular name "Mia" and hydroelectric energy, our study harnesses data from the US Social Security Administration to track the prevalence of the name over the years. Coupled with robust statistics on the hydroelectric output in Greece, our analysis aims to uncover patterns and correlations that tease out the intricate dance between nomenclature and natural resources.
As we embark on this curious journey, we cannot help but muse on the whimsical nature of scientific inquiry. Who would have thought that a harmless appellation could hold sway over the generation of clean, renewable energy? It is with this blend of scientific rigor and a touch of playfulness that we embark on our quest to unveil the mystique behind Mia's moniker and hydroelectric harmony in Greece.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To begin our quest for understanding the mystical connection between the first name Mia and the production of hydroelectric energy in Greece, we crafted a methodology that was as meticulous as it was whimsical. Our approach involved a blend of statistical analyses, data mining, and a sprinkle of imaginative pondering to capture the elusive essence of this peculiar association.

Firstly, we harnessed the robust dataset from the US Social Security Administration to track the fluctuations in the popularity of the name Mia from 1980 to 2021. Our team meticulously combed through the sea of names to isolate the occurrence and prevalence of Mia, ensuring that no "Mias" slipped through the cracks of our data dragnet. We then utilized advanced statistical techniques to wrangle this voluminous dataset into a form that could be scrutinized for any enigmatic patterns.

Simultaneously, we delved into the reservoirs of data from the Energy Information Administration to quantify the hydroelectric energy generated in the ancient land of Greece over the same time period. As we navigated this sea of energy statistics, we couldn't help but ponder the metaphysical currents that might be at play, linking the ebb and flow of renewable energy to the ebb and flow of human names.

In our analysis, we employed sophisticated statistical methods to assess the correlation between the prevalence of the name Mia and the hydroelectric energy output in Greece. We calculated correlation coefficients, ran regressions, and conducted other advanced analyses to uncover any hidden links that might have eluded a cursory glance. While our statistical pursuits grounded us in the realms of mathematical rigor, we allowed our musings to wander into the whimsical realms of speculative connections and fantastical correlations.

Our team also took notice of the temporal ebb and flow of these variables, allowing us to explore potential time lags and shifts that might reveal deeper insights into the underlying mechanisms governing this seemingly paradoxical relationship. While the nitty-gritty details of our statistical methods may not bear the charm of ethereal energy connections, they certainly served as sturdy vessels to navigate the choppy seas of data.

Furthermore, our methodology incorporated a healthy dose of whimsical ponderings, inviting imaginative speculation into the underlying mechanisms that might give rise to the curious correlation between a name and renewable energy. We indulged in the delightful exercise of contemplating the potential influence of unconscious associations, psychological resonances, and perhaps even a touch of serendipitous synchronicity in shaping this intriguing link.

Finally, being intent on illuminating the revelatory nature of our findings, we crafted a methodology that was not only rigorous but an exhilarating odyssey for the scientific mind. Our approach was a blend of quantitative analysis, qualitative wanderings, and a zest for uncovering unexpected connections—almost akin to solving a scientific riddle with playful curiosity.

In essence, our methodology was a tapestry woven with the threads of empirical rigor, statistical wizardry, and a sprinkle of imaginative pondering to untangle the perplexing relationship between Mia's moniker and the mesmerizing hum of hydroelectric harmony in Greece.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Mia and Hydopower energy generated in Greece. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.6976440, r-squared of 0.4867072, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mia's Moniker and Hydroelectric Harmony: Exploring the Relationship between the Name Mia and Hydropower Energy in Greece

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the seemingly inexplicable connection between the popularity of the first name Mia and the hydroelectric energy generated in Greece. Using robust data sources from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this enigmatic correlation. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.6976440 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021, indicating a substantial statistical relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. This peculiar link between the human moniker and hydroelectric energy in the cradle of civilization surely raises more questions than it answers and invites playful speculation about what other unforeseen connections may lurk within the realm of renewable energy.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the age-old saying goes, "What's in a name?" Well, in the case of the moniker "Mia" and its relationship with hydroelectric energy generation in Greece, it seems the answer could be "quite a lot!" The intriguing interplay between a popular first name and the generation of renewable energy has captivated and confounded researchers for decades. This study aims to shed light on this curious connection, utilizing statistical analysis and a dash of whimsy to unravel the mystery.
While one might initially dismiss this correlation as mere coincidence, our research delves deeper to explore potential mechanisms that could underpin this unexpected relationship. Is there some ethereal energy that binds the pronunciation of "Mia" to the gush and flow of water powering turbines? Or perhaps, it's the collective conscious decision of all those named Mia to channel their dynamic energy into the hydroelectric infrastructure of Greece? While these hypotheses might sound more suited to a fantasy novel, they pose a delightful challenge for our scientifically inclined minds.
To delve into this obscure bond between the popular name "Mia" and hydroelectric energy, our study harnesses data from the US Social Security Administration to track the prevalence of the name over the years. Coupled with robust statistics on the hydroelectric output in Greece, our analysis aims to uncover patterns and correlations that tease out the intricate dance between nomenclature and natural resources.
As we embark on this curious journey, we cannot help but muse on the whimsical nature of scientific inquiry. Who would have thought that a harmless appellation could hold sway over the generation of clean, renewable energy? It is with this blend of scientific rigor and a touch of playfulness that we embark on our quest to unveil the mystique behind Mia's moniker and hydroelectric harmony in Greece.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data yielded some rather electrifying results, illuminating the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Mia and the hydroelectric energy generated in Greece. The Pearson correlation coefficient for the period from 1980 to 2021 was found to be a striking 0.6976440, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This coefficient suggests that as the popularity of the name Mia waxes and wanes, so too does the hydroelectric energy production in Greece, much to the surprise of our research team and likely the delight of the Mias around the world.

Further bolstering the robustness of this relationship, the r-squared value of 0.4867072 indicates that a substantial proportion of the variability in hydroelectric energy generation in Greece can be explained by the fluctuations in the popularity of the name Mia. This unexpected statistical insight certainly raises the question: are Mias unwittingly harnessing the power of hydropower through the sheer force of their collective identity?

Certainly, it is crucial to note that while correlation does not imply causation, the strength of the relationship between the name Mia and hydropower energy in Greece is nothing short of remarkable. Though we must exercise caution before jumping to entirely frivolous conclusions, it is undeniable that this peculiar connection merits further exploration and invites a whimsical interpretation of the synergy between human nomenclature and renewable energy sources.

With a p-value less than 0.01, our results provide compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no association between the popularity of the name Mia and hydroelectric energy generated in Greece. Fig. 1 illustrates the undeniable correlation between the name Mia and hydroelectric energy output, visually capturing the enchanting dance between these seemingly disparate variables. With this unanticipated correlation and the thought-provoking possibilities it engenders, one cannot help but wonder what other humorous and unexpected connections lie latent within the realm of scientific inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Mia and Hydopower energy generated in Greece. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Mia's Moniker and Hydroelectric Harmony: Exploring the Relationship between the Name Mia and Hydropower Energy in Greece

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the seemingly inexplicable connection between the popularity of the first name Mia and the hydroelectric energy generated in Greece. Using robust data sources from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this enigmatic correlation. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.6976440 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021, indicating a substantial statistical relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. This peculiar link between the human moniker and hydroelectric energy in the cradle of civilization surely raises more questions than it answers and invites playful speculation about what other unforeseen connections may lurk within the realm of renewable energy.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of the relationship between the popularity of the first name Mia and the generation of hydropower energy in Greece has attracted significant attention from researchers across various disciplines. In "The Influence of Personal Names on Renewable Energy Production" by Smith, the authors delve into the curious correlation between human names and natural resource utilization, setting the stage for our investigation into the Mia-hydropower connection. Furthermore, Doe's "Naming Conventions and Their Impact on Energy Infrastructure" presents a comprehensive analysis of the influence of naming conventions on energy systems, providing a theoretical framework for our exploration.
Moving beyond the conventional literature, our consideration expands to non-fiction works such as "The Power of Mia" by Green and "Waves of Energy: Mia's Influence on Greek Hydroelectricity" by Blue, offering unique perspectives on the intersection of human nomenclature and sustainable energy production. Additionally, the fiction realm provides intriguing insights, with titles like "The Mia Effect" by Gold and "Rivers Run Mia" by Silver, provoking imaginative conjectures about the mystical resonance between the name Mia and the flow of water-induced energy.
In a lively deviation from traditional scholarly sources, our research has also drawn inspiration from popular culture, including cartoons like "The Adventures of Mia and Hydro-Man" and children's shows like "Mia's Magical Hydroelectric Adventure". While these sources may seem lighthearted, they serve as a source of creative stimulus in unpacking the enigmatic bond between a name and the generation of renewable energy.
This eclectic assortment of sources underscores the multifaceted nature of our investigation, blending rigorous academic inquiry with a sprinkle of whimsy to unravel the perplexing association between the popularity of the first name Mia and hydropower energy production in Greece. With this diverse tapestry of literature as our backdrop, we embark on our endeavor to decode the delightful conundrum at the intersection of nomenclature and renewable energy generation.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data yielded some rather electrifying results, illuminating the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Mia and the hydroelectric energy generated in Greece. The Pearson correlation coefficient for the period from 1980 to 2021 was found to be a striking 0.6976440, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This coefficient suggests that as the popularity of the name Mia waxes and wanes, so too does the hydroelectric energy production in Greece, much to the surprise of our research team and likely the delight of the Mias around the world.
Further bolstering the robustness of this relationship, the r-squared value of 0.4867072 indicates that a substantial proportion of the variability in hydroelectric energy generation in Greece can be explained by the fluctuations in the popularity of the name Mia. This unexpected statistical insight certainly raises the question: are Mias unwittingly harnessing the power of hydropower through the sheer force of their collective identity?
Certainly, it is crucial to note that while correlation does not imply causation, the strength of the relationship between the name Mia and hydropower energy in Greece is nothing short of remarkable. Though we must exercise caution before jumping to entirely frivolous conclusions, it is undeniable that this peculiar connection merits further exploration and invites a whimsical interpretation of the synergy between human nomenclature and renewable energy sources.
With a p-value less than 0.01, our results provide compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no association between the popularity of the name Mia and hydroelectric energy generated in Greece. Fig. 1 illustrates the undeniable correlation between the name Mia and hydroelectric energy output, visually capturing the enchanting dance between these seemingly disparate variables. With this unanticipated correlation and the thought-provoking possibilities it engenders, one cannot help but wonder what other humorous and unexpected connections lie latent within the realm of scientific inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The unearthed relationship between the popularity of the first name Mia and the generation of hydropower energy in Greece has left our research team simultaneously bewildered and utterly captivated. Our findings not only affirm but amplify the earlier research of Smith and Doe, validating the inexplicable interplay between human nomenclature and energy infrastructure. As our results echoed their prior work, we found ourselves nodding in amused fascination at the whimsically serious musings we had initially encountered in the literature review.

The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.6976440, supported by a p-value less than 0.01, leaves little room for skepticism regarding the substantial statistical association between the name Mia and hydroelectric energy production in Greece. This robust statistical support adds a dash of scientific spice to the charmingly offbeat nature of our investigation, akin to adding a scientifically quantifiable snicker to a lighthearted anecdote.

Moreover, the unexpected strength of the relationship, as indicated by an r-squared value of 0.4867072, compels us to mull over the notion that Mias may unknowingly have a subtle, ethereal influence on the ebbs and flows of hydropower energy. This curious avenue of speculation teases us with the prospect of Mias inadvertently serving as energy muses, effectively conducting water into power through the cadence of their name. While we must exercise academic restraint in drawing far-fetched conclusions, the delightful possibility that we may have stumbled upon the interconnected currents of human nomenclature and renewable energy fills us with scientific glee.

Our results' call to reject the null hypothesis amplifies the playful excitement of our research, inviting us to taste the subtly sweet flavors of scientific discovery, further fueling a lighthearted sense of wonder. The tangible allure of our statistical findings also breathes life into the fantastical inklings found in works such as "The Mia Effect" by Gold and "Rivers Run Mia" by Silver, illustrating how sheer serendipity can reveal intriguing connections lurking beneath the surface of scientific inquiry.

Our endeavor leaves us yearning to explore other seemingly unrelated variables that might twirl together in a harmonious statistical tango, akin to Mias and hydropower. Perhaps a confounding dance exists between the frequency of avocado toast consumption and solar energy output, or a whimsical minuet between the prevalence of penguin documentaries and wind power generation. As we bask in the glow of our findings, we are left wondering what other comical and serendipitous connections beckon us in the enchanting realm of scientific wonder.

In essence, our research not only substantiates the entertaining whimsy of prior works but also adds a hearty dash of statistical robustness to this delightful odyssey through the intertwined tapestry of human nomenclature and renewable energy production. With a wink towards the unexpected and a nod to the statistically valid, we open the door to a playful exploration of the hidden enchantments that lie within the methodological confines of scientific inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Mia and Hydopower energy generated in Greece. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Mia's Moniker and Hydroelectric Harmony: Exploring the Relationship between the Name Mia and Hydropower Energy in Greece

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the seemingly inexplicable connection between the popularity of the first name Mia and the hydroelectric energy generated in Greece. Using robust data sources from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this enigmatic correlation. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.6976440 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021, indicating a substantial statistical relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. This peculiar link between the human moniker and hydroelectric energy in the cradle of civilization surely raises more questions than it answers and invites playful speculation about what other unforeseen connections may lurk within the realm of renewable energy.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the age-old saying goes, "What's in a name?" Well, in the case of the moniker "Mia" and its relationship with hydroelectric energy generation in Greece, it seems the answer could be "quite a lot!" The intriguing interplay between a popular first name and the generation of renewable energy has captivated and confounded researchers for decades. This study aims to shed light on this curious connection, utilizing statistical analysis and a dash of whimsy to unravel the mystery.
While one might initially dismiss this correlation as mere coincidence, our research delves deeper to explore potential mechanisms that could underpin this unexpected relationship. Is there some ethereal energy that binds the pronunciation of "Mia" to the gush and flow of water powering turbines? Or perhaps, it's the collective conscious decision of all those named Mia to channel their dynamic energy into the hydroelectric infrastructure of Greece? While these hypotheses might sound more suited to a fantasy novel, they pose a delightful challenge for our scientifically inclined minds.
To delve into this obscure bond between the popular name "Mia" and hydroelectric energy, our study harnesses data from the US Social Security Administration to track the prevalence of the name over the years. Coupled with robust statistics on the hydroelectric output in Greece, our analysis aims to uncover patterns and correlations that tease out the intricate dance between nomenclature and natural resources.
As we embark on this curious journey, we cannot help but muse on the whimsical nature of scientific inquiry. Who would have thought that a harmless appellation could hold sway over the generation of clean, renewable energy? It is with this blend of scientific rigor and a touch of playfulness that we embark on our quest to unveil the mystique behind Mia's moniker and hydroelectric harmony in Greece.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data yielded some rather electrifying results, illuminating the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Mia and the hydroelectric energy generated in Greece. The Pearson correlation coefficient for the period from 1980 to 2021 was found to be a striking 0.6976440, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This coefficient suggests that as the popularity of the name Mia waxes and wanes, so too does the hydroelectric energy production in Greece, much to the surprise of our research team and likely the delight of the Mias around the world.
Further bolstering the robustness of this relationship, the r-squared value of 0.4867072 indicates that a substantial proportion of the variability in hydroelectric energy generation in Greece can be explained by the fluctuations in the popularity of the name Mia. This unexpected statistical insight certainly raises the question: are Mias unwittingly harnessing the power of hydropower through the sheer force of their collective identity?
Certainly, it is crucial to note that while correlation does not imply causation, the strength of the relationship between the name Mia and hydropower energy in Greece is nothing short of remarkable. Though we must exercise caution before jumping to entirely frivolous conclusions, it is undeniable that this peculiar connection merits further exploration and invites a whimsical interpretation of the synergy between human nomenclature and renewable energy sources.
With a p-value less than 0.01, our results provide compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no association between the popularity of the name Mia and hydroelectric energy generated in Greece. Fig. 1 illustrates the undeniable correlation between the name Mia and hydroelectric energy output, visually capturing the enchanting dance between these seemingly disparate variables. With this unanticipated correlation and the thought-provoking possibilities it engenders, one cannot help but wonder what other humorous and unexpected connections lie latent within the realm of scientific inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has illuminated the intriguing statistical relationship between the popularity of the name Mia and hydroelectric energy generation in Greece. While our findings may seem as over-the-top as a classic Greek tragedy, the robust correlation coefficient and compelling p-value provide strong support for the existence of this captivating connection. It appears that the name Mia holds more power than one may initially imagine, and we're not just making waves with this assertion.

As we reflect on the whimsy of our scientific odyssey, it is evident that the mystical ties between nomenclature and renewable energy beckon further exploration. While we may have stumbled upon this peculiar correlation by sheer chance, it's clear that we've tapped into a current of research that's both electrifying and unexpectedly amusing. Our results raise eyebrows and bring a sparkle to the eye, much like an unexpected punchline at a scientific conference.

In a field often marked by somber analysis and unyielding data, the playful nature of this correlation serves as a delightful reminder that science can surprise and provoke a chuckle. However, with all puns aside, it's time to firmly assert that no more research is needed in this area. We may have unlocked the mysterious bond between Mia and hydropower, but let's not step into the realm of chasing wild goose hypotheses. With a statistical relationship as clear as the Greek skies, perhaps it's best to let sleeping Mias lie, and allow this discovery to buoy our spirits as we dive into the depths of other enigmatic scientific puzzles.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Mia's Moniker and Hydroelectric Harmony: Exploring the Relationship between the Name Mia and Hydropower Energy in Greece. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Mia's Moniker and Hydroelectric Harmony: Exploring the Relationship between the Name Mia and Hydropower Energy in Greece. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Eclectic Research Advancements (SERA)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Mia's Moniker and Hydroelectric Harmony: Exploring the Relationship between the Name Mia and Hydropower Energy in Greece with an abstract of In this paper, we investigate the seemingly inexplicable connection between the popularity of the first name Mia and the hydroelectric energy generated in Greece. Using robust data sources from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this enigmatic correlation. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.6976440 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021, indicating a substantial statistical relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. This peculiar link between the human moniker and hydroelectric energy in the cradle of civilization surely raises more questions than it answers and invites playful speculation about what other unforeseen connections may lurk within the realm of renewable energy.

ChatGPT:

"Mia name popularity", "hydroelectric energy Greece", "relationship between name and energy", "correlation between Mia and hydropower", "statistics of Mia name", "renewable energy correlations", "Greece hydroelectric power", "unusual energy correlations", "human name and energy connection"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Mia
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Mia
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Mia

Hydopower energy generated in Greece
Detailed data title: Total hydopower energy generated in Greece in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Hydopower energy generated in Greece

Correlation r = 0.6976440 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4867072 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 48.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hydopower energy generated in Greece) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Mia) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.8E-7. 0.0000002828429974104185700000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.7 in 2.8E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,535,530 random variables You don't actually need 3 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.5, 0.83 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Mia (Babies born)68771954747145250049154962067678377982280086111021690249525662737345639236269709574151085912042109451018011453106571154012040131781353814944144671351812736125021125311153
Hydopower energy generated in Greece (Billion kWh)3.3963.3983.5512.3312.8522.7923.2222.7682.3541.8881.7513.0682.1812.262.5733.4944.3053.843183.684.5463.6562.0762.7724.7184.6254.9675.8062.5653.2795.327.4313.9984.3876.3374.4645.7825.5433.9625.0353.97983.343695.90922




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([687,719,547,471,452,500,491,549,620,676,783,779,822,800,861,1102,1690,2495,2566,2737,3456,3923,6269,7095,7415,10859,12042,10945,10180,11453,10657,11540,12040,13178,13538,14944,14467,13518,12736,12502,11253,11153,])
array_2 = np.array([3.396,3.398,3.551,2.331,2.852,2.792,3.222,2.768,2.354,1.888,1.751,3.068,2.181,2.26,2.573,3.494,4.305,3.84318,3.68,4.546,3.656,2.076,2.772,4.718,4.625,4.967,5.806,2.565,3.279,5.32,7.431,3.998,4.387,6.337,4.464,5.782,5.543,3.962,5.035,3.9798,3.34369,5.90922,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Mia"
array_2_name = "Hydopower energy generated in Greece"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 3930 · Black Variable ID: 2344 · Red Variable ID: 23695
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0