about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,753 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Wind power generated in Puerto Rico and the second variable is The number of operations research analysts in Indiana.  The chart goes from 2010 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The increase in Wind power in Puerto Rico has been generating a lot of energy buzz. This has led to a surge in productivity and efficiency across various industries. As a result, companies in Indiana are finding the need for more operations research analysts to help them ride the winds of change and make sense of all the new opportunities blowing their way! It's like they say, when it comes to hiring analysts, it's best to go with the flow of supply and demand!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a majestic landscape, featuring wind turbines dotting the verdant hills of Puerto Rico, their blades whirling vigorously in the powerful breeze. In the foreground, a group of focused individuals are gathered amidst the picturesque setting, engrossed in discussions and brainstorming sessions, alluding to the world of operations research. The scene should convey the sense of palpable energy and inspiration, symbolizing the harmonious convergence of renewable wind power and the growth of operations research in Indiana. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Wind power generated in Puerto Rico and The number of operations research analysts in Indiana. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie A scene from Skyrim inspired by bauhaus Low poly
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Wind power generated in Puerto Rico and The number of operations research analysts in Indiana, in the following situation: Because the wind power in Puerto Rico blew so strong, it caused a surge in energy that energized the brains of Hoosiers in Indiana, inspiring them to pursue careers in operations research! The winds of change brought a gust of inspiration, leading them to analyze and optimize systems with the force of a mighty hurricane!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vibrant scene, the powerful winds of Puerto Rico sweep across the landscape, turning the wind turbines and generating an abundance of energy. Meanwhile, in Indiana, a group of inspired individuals are gathered, delving into the world of operations research, their minds buzzing with energy and ideas. The winds of change have brought a surge of inspiration and determination, fueling the growth of both wind power and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In a vibrant scene, the powerful winds of Puerto Rico sweep across the landscape, turning the wind turbines and generating an abundance of energy. Meanwhile, in Indiana, a group of inspired individuals are gathered, delving into the world of operations research, their minds buzzing with energy and ideas. The winds of change have brought a surge of inspiration and determination, fueling the growth of both wind power and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a majestic landscape, featuring wind turbines dotting the verdant hills of Puerto Rico, their blades whirling vigorously in the powerful breeze. In the foreground, a group of focused individuals are gathered amidst the picturesque setting, engrossed in discussions and brainstorming sessions, alluding to the world of operations research. The scene should convey the sense of palpable energy and inspiration, symbolizing the harmonious convergence of renewable wind power and the growth of operations research in Indiana.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Wind power generated in Puerto Rico caused The number of operations research analysts in Indiana to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Blown Away: Uncovering the Winds of Change in the Relationship Between Wind Power in Puerto Rico and Operations Research Analysts in Indiana

The Journal of Renewable Energy Integration and Regional Economic Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Puerto Rico and The number of operations research analysts in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9591213 and p < 0.01 for 2010 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: Uncovering the Winds of Change in the Relationship Between Wind Power in Puerto Rico and Operations Research Analysts in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the surprising link between wind power generated in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana, uncovering a gust of unexpected findings. Leveraging data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team delved into this peculiar correlation, ultimately revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9591213 and p < 0.01 over the years 2010 to 2021. The results, though windswept, provide compelling evidence of a strong relationship between the two seemingly disparate variables, indicating that the winds of change may be blowing through the fields of energy and employment in unexpected ways. This study not only sheds light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated factors but also adds a breath of fresh air to the world of statistical research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Puerto Rico and The number of operations research analysts in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: Uncovering the Winds of Change in the Relationship Between Wind Power in Puerto Rico and Operations Research Analysts in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the surprising link between wind power generated in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana, uncovering a gust of unexpected findings. Leveraging data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team delved into this peculiar correlation, ultimately revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9591213 and p < 0.01 over the years 2010 to 2021. The results, though windswept, provide compelling evidence of a strong relationship between the two seemingly disparate variables, indicating that the winds of change may be blowing through the fields of energy and employment in unexpected ways. This study not only sheds light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated factors but also adds a breath of fresh air to the world of statistical research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the age-old adage goes, "the winds of change are blowing," and in the realm of energy production and labor market dynamics, this sentiment could not ring truer. While the link between wind power generation in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana may at first glance seem as unrelated as a tornado in a teapot, our investigation has unearthed a surprising and undeniable connection. These two seemingly disparate variables, like two ships passing in the night, have actually been sailing in remarkably close proximity for years.

The field of operations research, often likened to navigating through turbulent seas of data and modeling, might seem far removed from the island of Puerto Rico's wind turbines, which are quite literally harnessing the power of the air. Nevertheless, our research has blown away any preconceived notions of isolation between these areas of study, revealing a correlation so strong it could knock the wind out of you. Our findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also suggest that the winds of change may indeed be ushering in a new era of interconnectedness between energy production and labor market demand.

In this study, we embark on a journey to demystify the enigmatic relationship between wind power in the Caribbean and the career paths of analysts in the Heartland. Armed with data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set sail on the statistical seas, charting a course toward a deeper understanding of this uncharted territory. Our exploration is not merely academic, but rather an opportunity to harness the power of knowledge to revolutionize our understanding of how different sectors of our economy are intertwined.

Stay tuned as we navigate through the winds of data and come face to face with the surprising findings that challenge the conventional wisdom and breathe new life into the fields of energy and employment. So batten down the hatches, hold on to your hats, and prepare to be swept away by the groundbreaking discoveries that await in the following pages!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Puerto Rico and The number of operations research analysts in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: Uncovering the Winds of Change in the Relationship Between Wind Power in Puerto Rico and Operations Research Analysts in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the surprising link between wind power generated in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana, uncovering a gust of unexpected findings. Leveraging data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team delved into this peculiar correlation, ultimately revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9591213 and p < 0.01 over the years 2010 to 2021. The results, though windswept, provide compelling evidence of a strong relationship between the two seemingly disparate variables, indicating that the winds of change may be blowing through the fields of energy and employment in unexpected ways. This study not only sheds light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated factors but also adds a breath of fresh air to the world of statistical research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the age-old adage goes, "the winds of change are blowing," and in the realm of energy production and labor market dynamics, this sentiment could not ring truer. While the link between wind power generation in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana may at first glance seem as unrelated as a tornado in a teapot, our investigation has unearthed a surprising and undeniable connection. These two seemingly disparate variables, like two ships passing in the night, have actually been sailing in remarkably close proximity for years.
The field of operations research, often likened to navigating through turbulent seas of data and modeling, might seem far removed from the island of Puerto Rico's wind turbines, which are quite literally harnessing the power of the air. Nevertheless, our research has blown away any preconceived notions of isolation between these areas of study, revealing a correlation so strong it could knock the wind out of you. Our findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also suggest that the winds of change may indeed be ushering in a new era of interconnectedness between energy production and labor market demand.
In this study, we embark on a journey to demystify the enigmatic relationship between wind power in the Caribbean and the career paths of analysts in the Heartland. Armed with data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set sail on the statistical seas, charting a course toward a deeper understanding of this uncharted territory. Our exploration is not merely academic, but rather an opportunity to harness the power of knowledge to revolutionize our understanding of how different sectors of our economy are intertwined.
Stay tuned as we navigate through the winds of data and come face to face with the surprising findings that challenge the conventional wisdom and breathe new life into the fields of energy and employment. So batten down the hatches, hold on to your hats, and prepare to be swept away by the groundbreaking discoveries that await in the following pages!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith et al. (2015) in "The Journal of Renewable Energy" found that wind power generation in Puerto Rico had been steadily increasing over the past decade, with the trade winds providing a reliable source of renewable energy for the island. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) in "Operations Research Quarterly" delved into the employment trends in Indiana, uncovering a growing demand for operations research analysts in various industries. These seemingly unrelated studies laid the groundwork for our investigation into the elusive relationship between wind power in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana.

As we navigate through the literature, it becomes evident that the winds of change are not merely a poetic metaphor but a tangible force shaping the interconnectedness of these two distinct domains. "Wind Energy Explained" by J. F. Manwell and "Operations Research: An Introduction" by Hamdy Taha set the stage for our exploration, providing a foundation in both the physics of renewable energy and the principles of operations research.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, tales of whirlwinds and mathematical marvels in books like "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell and "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" by Mark Haddon offer an unexpected parallel to the winds of change buffeting the fields of energy and employment. These literary parallels, though whimsical, mirror the uncanny connection we have uncovered in our empirical investigation.

Turning to the digital world, the viral meme of the "Distracted Boyfriend" serves as a humorous reminder of the unexpected twists and turns one may encounter in statistical analysis. Just as the character's gaze shifts from one object of interest to another, our exploration of the relationship between wind power in Puerto Rico and operations research analysts in Indiana has led us down a path filled with surprising revelations and unforeseen connections.

With our compass pointed toward the intersection of these unexpected variables, we embark on a journey through the windswept landscape of empirical evidence, statistical analysis, and whimsical literary connections. As we plumb the depths of this uncharted territory, the unexpected gusts of correlation may very well sweep us off our feet into uncharted and uproarious research territories.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Puerto Rico and The number of operations research analysts in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2010 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: Uncovering the Winds of Change in the Relationship Between Wind Power in Puerto Rico and Operations Research Analysts in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the surprising link between wind power generated in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana, uncovering a gust of unexpected findings. Leveraging data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team delved into this peculiar correlation, ultimately revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9591213 and p < 0.01 over the years 2010 to 2021. The results, though windswept, provide compelling evidence of a strong relationship between the two seemingly disparate variables, indicating that the winds of change may be blowing through the fields of energy and employment in unexpected ways. This study not only sheds light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated factors but also adds a breath of fresh air to the world of statistical research.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the age-old adage goes, "the winds of change are blowing," and in the realm of energy production and labor market dynamics, this sentiment could not ring truer. While the link between wind power generation in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana may at first glance seem as unrelated as a tornado in a teapot, our investigation has unearthed a surprising and undeniable connection. These two seemingly disparate variables, like two ships passing in the night, have actually been sailing in remarkably close proximity for years.
The field of operations research, often likened to navigating through turbulent seas of data and modeling, might seem far removed from the island of Puerto Rico's wind turbines, which are quite literally harnessing the power of the air. Nevertheless, our research has blown away any preconceived notions of isolation between these areas of study, revealing a correlation so strong it could knock the wind out of you. Our findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also suggest that the winds of change may indeed be ushering in a new era of interconnectedness between energy production and labor market demand.
In this study, we embark on a journey to demystify the enigmatic relationship between wind power in the Caribbean and the career paths of analysts in the Heartland. Armed with data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set sail on the statistical seas, charting a course toward a deeper understanding of this uncharted territory. Our exploration is not merely academic, but rather an opportunity to harness the power of knowledge to revolutionize our understanding of how different sectors of our economy are intertwined.
Stay tuned as we navigate through the winds of data and come face to face with the surprising findings that challenge the conventional wisdom and breathe new life into the fields of energy and employment. So batten down the hatches, hold on to your hats, and prepare to be swept away by the groundbreaking discoveries that await in the following pages!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the unexpected relationship between wind power generation in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana, our research team employed a methodological approach that could be likened to navigating uncharted statistical waters amidst swirling winds of data. Our research design was akin to setting sail on a voyage of discovery, with the aim of not only capturing the gusts of correlation between these variables but also weathering the storm of potential confounding factors.

Data Sources:
Our team scoured the vast expanse of the internet to gather relevant information, with a keen focus on data from authoritative sources such as the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Gathering data from the years 2010 to 2021, we cast our net wide to encompass a comprehensive timeframe, akin to harnessing the breadth and depth of the ocean to capture the ebbs and flows of our variables of interest.

Unconventional Data Collection:
In true exploratory fashion, we utilized a variety of unconventional methods to capture the nuances of wind power generation in Puerto Rico and the employment landscape of operations research analysts in Indiana. This included employing metaphorical kites to capture the winds of change in energy production and navigating through the maze of labor market statistics aboard a hypothetical statistical gondola.

Statistical Analysis:
Having gathered the data like seasoned seafarers hauling in the bounty of the statistical seas, we set sail for the treacherous waters of statistical analysis. Leveraging advanced statistical techniques, such as correlation analysis and time series modeling, we charted a course to uncover the hidden patterns within the tumultuous waves of data. In a manner befitting the stormy relationship between wind power and employment, we sought to not only identify correlations but also to interrogate the winds of causation that could potentially drive this relationship.

Navigating Confounding Factors:
In our quest for scientific rigor, we meticulously navigated through the choppy waters of confounding factors that might have threatened to capsize our findings. Just as a skilled navigator steers a ship through unpredictable weather, our team employed rigorous statistical controls to ensure that our findings were not merely swept up in a maelstrom of spurious correlations.

Overall, our methodological approach was characterized by a spirit of adventure and discovery, much like explorers embarking on a quest to map out new territories. Our voyage through the statistical seas may not have been without its tumultuous moments, but it has ultimately led us to the shores of intriguing findings that challenge conventional wisdom and breathe new life into the fields of energy production and employment analysis. Set your compass for the following sections as we unveil the surprising voyages and discoveries that lie ahead!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Puerto Rico and The number of operations research analysts in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2010 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9591213, r-squared of 0.9199136, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: Uncovering the Winds of Change in the Relationship Between Wind Power in Puerto Rico and Operations Research Analysts in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the surprising link between wind power generated in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana, uncovering a gust of unexpected findings. Leveraging data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team delved into this peculiar correlation, ultimately revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9591213 and p < 0.01 over the years 2010 to 2021. The results, though windswept, provide compelling evidence of a strong relationship between the two seemingly disparate variables, indicating that the winds of change may be blowing through the fields of energy and employment in unexpected ways. This study not only sheds light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated factors but also adds a breath of fresh air to the world of statistical research.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the age-old adage goes, "the winds of change are blowing," and in the realm of energy production and labor market dynamics, this sentiment could not ring truer. While the link between wind power generation in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana may at first glance seem as unrelated as a tornado in a teapot, our investigation has unearthed a surprising and undeniable connection. These two seemingly disparate variables, like two ships passing in the night, have actually been sailing in remarkably close proximity for years.
The field of operations research, often likened to navigating through turbulent seas of data and modeling, might seem far removed from the island of Puerto Rico's wind turbines, which are quite literally harnessing the power of the air. Nevertheless, our research has blown away any preconceived notions of isolation between these areas of study, revealing a correlation so strong it could knock the wind out of you. Our findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also suggest that the winds of change may indeed be ushering in a new era of interconnectedness between energy production and labor market demand.
In this study, we embark on a journey to demystify the enigmatic relationship between wind power in the Caribbean and the career paths of analysts in the Heartland. Armed with data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set sail on the statistical seas, charting a course toward a deeper understanding of this uncharted territory. Our exploration is not merely academic, but rather an opportunity to harness the power of knowledge to revolutionize our understanding of how different sectors of our economy are intertwined.
Stay tuned as we navigate through the winds of data and come face to face with the surprising findings that challenge the conventional wisdom and breathe new life into the fields of energy and employment. So batten down the hatches, hold on to your hats, and prepare to be swept away by the groundbreaking discoveries that await in the following pages!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The findings of our study showcase a remarkably strong correlation between wind power generated in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana. The correlation coefficient of 0.9591213 and an r-squared value of 0.9199136 suggest a robust relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this connection, indicating that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation by chance is less than 1 in 100.

Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the strikingly close relationship between wind power in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana. The data points are clustered tightly around a clear upward-sloping trend line, providing a visual representation of the gusty correlation uncovered in our analysis.

These results, like a gust of wind on a calm day, have blown away any skepticism surrounding the connection between these disparate variables. While one might expect wind power in Puerto Rico to only influence energy-related occupations, the unexpected link to operations research analysts in Indiana adds a new dimension to our understanding of the interconnectedness of different sectors of the economy.

This intriguing correlation rattles the traditional notions of cause and effect, prompting us to reconsider the ways in which economic and environmental factors may interact. It appears that the winds of change may be blowing through the fields of energy and employment in ways we never anticipated, leaving us to ponder the vast expanse of uncharted territory in statistical research.

The implications of these findings are substantial, as they call for a reevaluation of the conventional boundaries that have historically separated distinct domains of study. This study not only serves as a testament to the surprising nature of statistical relationships but also invites further exploration into the intricate web of connections that exist within the fabric of our economy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Puerto Rico and The number of operations research analysts in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: Uncovering the Winds of Change in the Relationship Between Wind Power in Puerto Rico and Operations Research Analysts in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the surprising link between wind power generated in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana, uncovering a gust of unexpected findings. Leveraging data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team delved into this peculiar correlation, ultimately revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9591213 and p < 0.01 over the years 2010 to 2021. The results, though windswept, provide compelling evidence of a strong relationship between the two seemingly disparate variables, indicating that the winds of change may be blowing through the fields of energy and employment in unexpected ways. This study not only sheds light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated factors but also adds a breath of fresh air to the world of statistical research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2015) in "The Journal of Renewable Energy" found that wind power generation in Puerto Rico had been steadily increasing over the past decade, with the trade winds providing a reliable source of renewable energy for the island. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) in "Operations Research Quarterly" delved into the employment trends in Indiana, uncovering a growing demand for operations research analysts in various industries. These seemingly unrelated studies laid the groundwork for our investigation into the elusive relationship between wind power in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana.
As we navigate through the literature, it becomes evident that the winds of change are not merely a poetic metaphor but a tangible force shaping the interconnectedness of these two distinct domains. "Wind Energy Explained" by J. F. Manwell and "Operations Research: An Introduction" by Hamdy Taha set the stage for our exploration, providing a foundation in both the physics of renewable energy and the principles of operations research.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, tales of whirlwinds and mathematical marvels in books like "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell and "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" by Mark Haddon offer an unexpected parallel to the winds of change buffeting the fields of energy and employment. These literary parallels, though whimsical, mirror the uncanny connection we have uncovered in our empirical investigation.
Turning to the digital world, the viral meme of the "Distracted Boyfriend" serves as a humorous reminder of the unexpected twists and turns one may encounter in statistical analysis. Just as the character's gaze shifts from one object of interest to another, our exploration of the relationship between wind power in Puerto Rico and operations research analysts in Indiana has led us down a path filled with surprising revelations and unforeseen connections.
With our compass pointed toward the intersection of these unexpected variables, we embark on a journey through the windswept landscape of empirical evidence, statistical analysis, and whimsical literary connections. As we plumb the depths of this uncharted territory, the unexpected gusts of correlation may very well sweep us off our feet into uncharted and uproarious research territories.

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our study showcase a remarkably strong correlation between wind power generated in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana. The correlation coefficient of 0.9591213 and an r-squared value of 0.9199136 suggest a robust relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this connection, indicating that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation by chance is less than 1 in 100.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the strikingly close relationship between wind power in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana. The data points are clustered tightly around a clear upward-sloping trend line, providing a visual representation of the gusty correlation uncovered in our analysis.
These results, like a gust of wind on a calm day, have blown away any skepticism surrounding the connection between these disparate variables. While one might expect wind power in Puerto Rico to only influence energy-related occupations, the unexpected link to operations research analysts in Indiana adds a new dimension to our understanding of the interconnectedness of different sectors of the economy.
This intriguing correlation rattles the traditional notions of cause and effect, prompting us to reconsider the ways in which economic and environmental factors may interact. It appears that the winds of change may be blowing through the fields of energy and employment in ways we never anticipated, leaving us to ponder the vast expanse of uncharted territory in statistical research.
The implications of these findings are substantial, as they call for a reevaluation of the conventional boundaries that have historically separated distinct domains of study. This study not only serves as a testament to the surprising nature of statistical relationships but also invites further exploration into the intricate web of connections that exist within the fabric of our economy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The remarkable correlation unveiled in this study has not only blown our minds but has also shed light on the unexpected interconnectedness of wind power in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana. The strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables goes beyond mere coincidence, as supported by the compelling correlation coefficient of 0.9591213 and a p-value of less than 0.01. These findings align with the prior research of Smith et al. (2015), who highlighted the increasing trend of wind power generation in Puerto Rico, and Doe and Jones (2018), who identified the growing demand for operations research analysts in Indiana. It seems that the winds of change are indeed sweeping through both the energy landscape of Puerto Rico and the employment terrain of Indiana, intertwining these domains in a manner that defies conventional wisdom.

It appears that our study has not only harnessed the gusty correlation between wind power and employment but has also blown away any doubts about the validity of this intriguing relationship. The unexpected link between wind power in Puerto Rico and operations research analysts in Indiana challenges traditional assumptions about the influence of renewable energy on employment dynamics. As we ride the winds of statistical significance, it becomes evident that the interconnectedness of these disparate sectors may hold the key to unlocking new opportunities and avenues for economic development.

The findings of this study serve as a breath of fresh air in the realm of statistical research, highlighting the whimsical interconnectedness of variables that may, at first glance, appear entirely unrelated. As we venture into uncharted territories of empirical investigation, the gusty correlation between wind power in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana invites us to reconsider the traditional boundaries that often confine our understanding of economic and environmental factors. It seems the winds of change have led us to an unexpected crossroads, where the convergence of renewable energy and employment dynamics presents an exhilarating opportunity for future exploration and inquiry.

In conclusion, the winds of statistical evidence have propelled us into a landscape of unforeseen connections and surprising revelations. Our study not only reinforces the windswept findings of prior research but also invites further exploration into the intricate web of relationships that define the intricate fabric of our economy. As we navigate through the gusty corridors of statistical analysis, the unexpected parallel between wind power in Puerto Rico and operations research analysts in Indiana reminds us of the remarkable and unpredictable forces that shape the world of empirical investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Puerto Rico and The number of operations research analysts in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: Uncovering the Winds of Change in the Relationship Between Wind Power in Puerto Rico and Operations Research Analysts in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the surprising link between wind power generated in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana, uncovering a gust of unexpected findings. Leveraging data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team delved into this peculiar correlation, ultimately revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9591213 and p < 0.01 over the years 2010 to 2021. The results, though windswept, provide compelling evidence of a strong relationship between the two seemingly disparate variables, indicating that the winds of change may be blowing through the fields of energy and employment in unexpected ways. This study not only sheds light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated factors but also adds a breath of fresh air to the world of statistical research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the age-old adage goes, "the winds of change are blowing," and in the realm of energy production and labor market dynamics, this sentiment could not ring truer. While the link between wind power generation in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana may at first glance seem as unrelated as a tornado in a teapot, our investigation has unearthed a surprising and undeniable connection. These two seemingly disparate variables, like two ships passing in the night, have actually been sailing in remarkably close proximity for years.
The field of operations research, often likened to navigating through turbulent seas of data and modeling, might seem far removed from the island of Puerto Rico's wind turbines, which are quite literally harnessing the power of the air. Nevertheless, our research has blown away any preconceived notions of isolation between these areas of study, revealing a correlation so strong it could knock the wind out of you. Our findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also suggest that the winds of change may indeed be ushering in a new era of interconnectedness between energy production and labor market demand.
In this study, we embark on a journey to demystify the enigmatic relationship between wind power in the Caribbean and the career paths of analysts in the Heartland. Armed with data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set sail on the statistical seas, charting a course toward a deeper understanding of this uncharted territory. Our exploration is not merely academic, but rather an opportunity to harness the power of knowledge to revolutionize our understanding of how different sectors of our economy are intertwined.
Stay tuned as we navigate through the winds of data and come face to face with the surprising findings that challenge the conventional wisdom and breathe new life into the fields of energy and employment. So batten down the hatches, hold on to your hats, and prepare to be swept away by the groundbreaking discoveries that await in the following pages!

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our study showcase a remarkably strong correlation between wind power generated in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana. The correlation coefficient of 0.9591213 and an r-squared value of 0.9199136 suggest a robust relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this connection, indicating that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation by chance is less than 1 in 100.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the strikingly close relationship between wind power in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana. The data points are clustered tightly around a clear upward-sloping trend line, providing a visual representation of the gusty correlation uncovered in our analysis.
These results, like a gust of wind on a calm day, have blown away any skepticism surrounding the connection between these disparate variables. While one might expect wind power in Puerto Rico to only influence energy-related occupations, the unexpected link to operations research analysts in Indiana adds a new dimension to our understanding of the interconnectedness of different sectors of the economy.
This intriguing correlation rattles the traditional notions of cause and effect, prompting us to reconsider the ways in which economic and environmental factors may interact. It appears that the winds of change may be blowing through the fields of energy and employment in ways we never anticipated, leaving us to ponder the vast expanse of uncharted territory in statistical research.
The implications of these findings are substantial, as they call for a reevaluation of the conventional boundaries that have historically separated distinct domains of study. This study not only serves as a testament to the surprising nature of statistical relationships but also invites further exploration into the intricate web of connections that exist within the fabric of our economy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has blown us away with the unexpected link between wind power in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana. It seems the winds of change are not just a cliché but a statistical reality, as evidenced by the robust correlation coefficient and the p-value that's rarer than a unicorn sighting.

This correlation has more twists and turns than a tornado, challenging conventional wisdom and leaving us breathless with its implications. Who would have thought that the gentle breeze of wind power in Puerto Rico could have such a strong pull on the career paths of analysts in Indiana? It's as if the winds of statistical fate have conspired to intertwine these two seemingly unrelated variables in an intricate dance of data.

Our findings shake the traditional notions of cause and effect to their core. It appears that these winds of change may be blowing through the fields of energy and employment, leaving us to ponder the vast expanse of uncharted territory in statistical research. It's as if Mother Nature herself has set sail on the statistical seas, guiding us toward a new era of interconnectedness between economic sectors.

But fear not, for this is not a wild gust of statistical anomaly. No, our results hold water. The correlation we've uncovered is as sturdy as a wind turbine in a hurricane. It's time we embrace the unpredictability of statistical relationships and sail forth into the uncharted waters of interconnectedness.

With that said, we assert that further research in this area is not necessary. The winds of statistical destiny have spoken, and it's time we bask in the breezy brilliance of this unexpected correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Blown Away: Uncovering the Winds of Change in the Relationship Between Wind Power in Puerto Rico and Operations Research Analysts in Indiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Renewable Energy Integration and Regional Economic Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Blown Away: Uncovering the Winds of Change in the Relationship Between Wind Power in Puerto Rico and Operations Research Analysts in Indiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Renewable Energy Integration and Optimization (CREIO)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Blown Away: Uncovering the Winds of Change in the Relationship Between Wind Power in Puerto Rico and Operations Research Analysts in Indiana with an abstract of This paper explores the surprising link between wind power generated in Puerto Rico and the number of operations research analysts in Indiana, uncovering a gust of unexpected findings. Leveraging data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team delved into this peculiar correlation, ultimately revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9591213 and p < 0.01 over the years 2010 to 2021. The results, though windswept, provide compelling evidence of a strong relationship between the two seemingly disparate variables, indicating that the winds of change may be blowing through the fields of energy and employment in unexpected ways. This study not only sheds light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated factors but also adds a breath of fresh air to the world of statistical research.

ChatGPT:

Wind power, Puerto Rico, operations research analysts, Indiana, energy information administration, bureau of labor statistics, correlation coefficient, employment, statistical research, interconnectedness, relationship, data analysis, wind energy, employment trends

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Wind power generated in Puerto Rico
Detailed data title: Total wind power generated in Puerto Rico in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Wind power generated in Puerto Rico

The number of operations research analysts in Indiana
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of operations research analysts in Indiana
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of operations research analysts in Indiana

Correlation r = 0.9591213 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9199136 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 92% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of operations research analysts in Indiana) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Wind power generated in Puerto Rico) over the 12 years from 2010 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.4E-7. 0.0000008392969050121641000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 8.4E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,191,473 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.86, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Wind power generated in Puerto Rico (Billion kWh)0.0010.0010.0150.1730.2180.2390.1930.1490.1080.1590.1430.162554
The number of operations research analysts in Indiana (Laborers)1030960980119014201400139012301140128012601290




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.001,0.001,0.015,0.173,0.218,0.239,0.193,0.149,0.108,0.159,0.143,0.162554,])
array_2 = np.array([1030,960,980,1190,1420,1400,1390,1230,1140,1280,1260,1290,])
array_1_name = "Wind power generated in Puerto Rico"
array_2_name = "The number of operations research analysts in Indiana"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 3753 · Black Variable ID: 23910 · Red Variable ID: 7591
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0