about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,668 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of dishwashers in Illinois and the second variable is Season wins for the Chicago Bears.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of dishwashers in Illinois decreased, so did the Bears' ability to clean up their game. With fewer dishwashers around, the team couldn't handle the pressure and ended up having a washout of a season. The correlation between dirty dishes and losing matches became all too clear - it seems the fate of the Chicago Bears was truly linked to the dish-tastrophe in Illinois. Remember, when it comes to football success, the cleanliness of the players may have been at stake all along!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image in the style of a cute cartoon that depicts an Illinois kitchen. The kitchen has a cheerful and cozy atmosphere, with sunny yellow walls and checkered blue curtains. In the foreground, there are three dishwashers lined up in a row, gradually diminishing in number from three to two, and then one. Each dishwasher has a sad and surprised expression as if they are disappearing. In the background, a TV screen shows the Chicago Bears football game. The Bears players are shown on the field, fumbling and dropping the ball, their uniforms visibly dirty and tattered. The kitchen surroundings are adorned with little bear motifs and the color scheme is in the team's iconic navy blue and orange. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of dishwashers in Illinois and Season wins for the Chicago Bears. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Vaporwave Cute 2D animation Minimalism Cute cartoon
ChatGPT: Cute cartoon

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of dishwashers in Illinois and Season wins for the Chicago Bears, in the following situation: As the number of dishwashers in Illinois decreased, so did the efficiency of the Bears' offense. Without clean dishes, the team couldn't "dish out" the ball properly, leading to fumbles and interceptions. Plus, with dirty uniforms, they were too "soiled" to play well!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In an Illinois kitchen, the number of dishwashers decreases while the Chicago Bears play on a TV screen in the background. As the dishwashers decrease, the Bears' offense falters. Players fumble and drop the ball, and the team struggles to move forward on the field, their uniforms visibly dirty and tattered.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute cartoon ] and depicting this scene: In an Illinois kitchen, the number of dishwashers decreases while the Chicago Bears play on a TV screen in the background. As the dishwashers decrease, the Bears' offense falters. Players fumble and drop the ball, and the team struggles to move forward on the field, their uniforms visibly dirty and tattered. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image in the style of a cute cartoon that depicts an Illinois kitchen. The kitchen has a cheerful and cozy atmosphere, with sunny yellow walls and checkered blue curtains. In the foreground, there are three dishwashers lined up in a row, gradually diminishing in number from three to two, and then one. Each dishwasher has a sad and surprised expression as if they are disappearing. In the background, a TV screen shows the Chicago Bears football game. The Bears players are shown on the field, fumbling and dropping the ball, their uniforms visibly dirty and tattered. The kitchen surroundings are adorned with little bear motifs and the color scheme is in the team's iconic navy blue and orange.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of dishwashers in Illinois caused Season wins for the Chicago Bears to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Who's Dishin' Out Wins? A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' Season Success

Journal of Sports Appliance Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dishwashers in Illinois and Season wins for the Chicago Bears. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.5498565 and p < 0.05 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Who's Dishin' Out Wins? A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' Season Success

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unconventional realms of sports and household appliances to investigate the potential link between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the season wins for the Chicago Bears. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, our research team found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5498565 and p < 0.05 over the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings challenge traditional notions of sports analysis and household economics, demonstrating the unexpected connections that can emerge when seemingly disparate factors are examined. Join us as we embark on a journey through the whimsical world of statistical correlations, where the clinking of dishes and the roar of the stadium converge in an unlikely dance of data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dishwashers in Illinois and Season wins for the Chicago Bears. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Who's Dishin' Out Wins? A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' Season Success

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unconventional realms of sports and household appliances to investigate the potential link between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the season wins for the Chicago Bears. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, our research team found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5498565 and p < 0.05 over the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings challenge traditional notions of sports analysis and household economics, demonstrating the unexpected connections that can emerge when seemingly disparate factors are examined. Join us as we embark on a journey through the whimsical world of statistical correlations, where the clinking of dishes and the roar of the stadium converge in an unlikely dance of data.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

In the grand casino of statistical analysis, where the chips are data and the deck is shuffled with variables, we, the intrepid research team, have rolled the dice on a gambit of a study. Welcome to the unfolding saga of "Who's Dishin' Out Wins? A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' Season Success." It's a tale of two seemingly unrelated entities coming together in a dance of data that would make even the most stoic statistician wiggle with excitement.

But hold on to your lab coats, folks, for we are about to embark on an expedition into uncharted territory - where household appliances meet sports success, where dishwashers play a role in football fortunes, and where statistical correlations tread the fine line between the expected and the absurd. So, buckle up as we journey through the labyrinth of data, where the dishes are as clear as the outcome of a game and the touchdowns are as sparkling as a freshly scrubbed pot.

In the realm of statistical inquiry, the landscape is often littered with familiar pairings - the classic duets of supply and demand, income and expenditure, or cause and effect. Yet, nestled in the annals of empirical exploration, we find ourselves drawn to the peculiar magnetism of an unlikely pair - the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the triumphs of the Chicago Bears. Two entities, seemingly unrelated, converge in a spectacle of statistical intrigue that has left even our most seasoned researchers scratching their heads in bemusement.

The stage is set, the data is poised, and the game is afoot. As we peer into the realms of household economics and sports analysis, we are confronted with a correlation coefficient that dances tantalizingly at 0.5498565, with a p-value that winks mischievously at p < 0.05. Yes, you heard that right, dear readers! The numbers have spoken, and they've dared to suggest a synchronous tango between the clink of dishware and the roar of the gridiron.

As we sift through the ocean of variables and unravel the yarn of data, we are reminded that statistical analysis is not just about crunching numbers – it's about heeding the whispers of the unexpected, and recognizing that the most delightful discoveries often emerge from the most serendipitous of pairings. It's a reminder that in the magical world of research, no variable is too quirky, no correlation too whimsical, and no finding too outlandish.

So, come one, come all, as we venture into the wondrous world of statistical correlations, where household appliances and touchdowns converge in a kaleidoscope of numbers, and where the ordinary becomes extraordinary. The journey promises to be a whirlwind of statistical surprises, where the unlikeliest of bedfellows waltz through the data and where the unpredictable outcome is the only constant. Join us, dear readers, for this unprecedented expedition into the confluence of dishwashers and gridiron glory.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dishwashers in Illinois and Season wins for the Chicago Bears. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Who's Dishin' Out Wins? A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' Season Success

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unconventional realms of sports and household appliances to investigate the potential link between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the season wins for the Chicago Bears. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, our research team found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5498565 and p < 0.05 over the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings challenge traditional notions of sports analysis and household economics, demonstrating the unexpected connections that can emerge when seemingly disparate factors are examined. Join us as we embark on a journey through the whimsical world of statistical correlations, where the clinking of dishes and the roar of the stadium converge in an unlikely dance of data.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
In the grand casino of statistical analysis, where the chips are data and the deck is shuffled with variables, we, the intrepid research team, have rolled the dice on a gambit of a study. Welcome to the unfolding saga of "Who's Dishin' Out Wins? A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' Season Success." It's a tale of two seemingly unrelated entities coming together in a dance of data that would make even the most stoic statistician wiggle with excitement.
But hold on to your lab coats, folks, for we are about to embark on an expedition into uncharted territory - where household appliances meet sports success, where dishwashers play a role in football fortunes, and where statistical correlations tread the fine line between the expected and the absurd. So, buckle up as we journey through the labyrinth of data, where the dishes are as clear as the outcome of a game and the touchdowns are as sparkling as a freshly scrubbed pot.
In the realm of statistical inquiry, the landscape is often littered with familiar pairings - the classic duets of supply and demand, income and expenditure, or cause and effect. Yet, nestled in the annals of empirical exploration, we find ourselves drawn to the peculiar magnetism of an unlikely pair - the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the triumphs of the Chicago Bears. Two entities, seemingly unrelated, converge in a spectacle of statistical intrigue that has left even our most seasoned researchers scratching their heads in bemusement.
The stage is set, the data is poised, and the game is afoot. As we peer into the realms of household economics and sports analysis, we are confronted with a correlation coefficient that dances tantalizingly at 0.5498565, with a p-value that winks mischievously at p < 0.05. Yes, you heard that right, dear readers! The numbers have spoken, and they've dared to suggest a synchronous tango between the clink of dishware and the roar of the gridiron.
As we sift through the ocean of variables and unravel the yarn of data, we are reminded that statistical analysis is not just about crunching numbers – it's about heeding the whispers of the unexpected, and recognizing that the most delightful discoveries often emerge from the most serendipitous of pairings. It's a reminder that in the magical world of research, no variable is too quirky, no correlation too whimsical, and no finding too outlandish.
So, come one, come all, as we venture into the wondrous world of statistical correlations, where household appliances and touchdowns converge in a kaleidoscope of numbers, and where the ordinary becomes extraordinary. The journey promises to be a whirlwind of statistical surprises, where the unlikeliest of bedfellows waltz through the data and where the unpredictable outcome is the only constant. Join us, dear readers, for this unprecedented expedition into the confluence of dishwashers and gridiron glory.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between household appliances and sports success has long been a topic of interest in the world of statistical analysis. Historically, researchers have sought to uncover the hidden dynamics between seemingly disparate entities, such as the number of dishwashers in a given region and the performance of a local sports team. As Smith et al. (2010) aptly noted in their seminal work, "Household Economics and Sports Success," the interplay between domestic technologies and athletic outcomes remains an enigmatic puzzle, ripe for exploration.

Doe and Jones (2015) further delved into the intriguing nexus between home amenities and sporting achievements in their comprehensive study, "Appliances and Touchdowns: A Statistical Odyssey." Their rigorous analysis unearthed compelling correlations between the prevalence of specific household devices and the triumphs of various sports teams. However, it is important to note that the specific link between dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' season wins has been a relatively uncharted territory in the realm of academic inquiry.

Leaping from the realm of academia to the realm of practical wisdom, "The Curious Case of Home Appliances and Sports" by Lorem and Ipsum (2018) offers a delightful exploration of the idiosyncratic connections that exist beyond the realm of traditional statistical modeling. The authors astutely observe that while the world of household appliances and sports may appear disparate, there is often an underlying syncopation that defies conventional understanding.

Steering now into the realm of creative literature, a trove of fictional works emerges that, while not grounded in empirical evidence, offers imaginative insights into the potential interplay between household amenities and athletic prowess. Books such as "The Quarterback's Dishwashing Dilemma" by Fictional Author A and "Clean Sweeps and Touchdowns: A Tale of Squeaky Clean Success" by Fictional Author B beckon readers into whimsical narratives where the clatter of kitchenware intertwines with the roar of the crowd.

Beyond the bounds of printed literature, cinematic endeavors such as "Dishwashers of Destiny" and "Gridiron Suds" have playfully toyed with the notion of unexpected connections between household chores and sports glory. While these cultural works may not offer empirical evidence, their imaginative forays into the amalgamation of dishwashing and football add a delightful layer of whimsy to the broader conversation.

As our expedition into the correlation between dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' season success unfolds, we are reminded that the journey of statistical inquiry is not merely about propounding serious hypotheses and conducting rigorous analyses. It also entails a dance with the absurd, a flirtation with the unexpected, and a willingness to embrace the delightfully wacky connections that emerge in the tapestry of data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dishwashers in Illinois and Season wins for the Chicago Bears. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Who's Dishin' Out Wins? A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' Season Success

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unconventional realms of sports and household appliances to investigate the potential link between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the season wins for the Chicago Bears. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, our research team found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5498565 and p < 0.05 over the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings challenge traditional notions of sports analysis and household economics, demonstrating the unexpected connections that can emerge when seemingly disparate factors are examined. Join us as we embark on a journey through the whimsical world of statistical correlations, where the clinking of dishes and the roar of the stadium converge in an unlikely dance of data.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
In the grand casino of statistical analysis, where the chips are data and the deck is shuffled with variables, we, the intrepid research team, have rolled the dice on a gambit of a study. Welcome to the unfolding saga of "Who's Dishin' Out Wins? A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' Season Success." It's a tale of two seemingly unrelated entities coming together in a dance of data that would make even the most stoic statistician wiggle with excitement.
But hold on to your lab coats, folks, for we are about to embark on an expedition into uncharted territory - where household appliances meet sports success, where dishwashers play a role in football fortunes, and where statistical correlations tread the fine line between the expected and the absurd. So, buckle up as we journey through the labyrinth of data, where the dishes are as clear as the outcome of a game and the touchdowns are as sparkling as a freshly scrubbed pot.
In the realm of statistical inquiry, the landscape is often littered with familiar pairings - the classic duets of supply and demand, income and expenditure, or cause and effect. Yet, nestled in the annals of empirical exploration, we find ourselves drawn to the peculiar magnetism of an unlikely pair - the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the triumphs of the Chicago Bears. Two entities, seemingly unrelated, converge in a spectacle of statistical intrigue that has left even our most seasoned researchers scratching their heads in bemusement.
The stage is set, the data is poised, and the game is afoot. As we peer into the realms of household economics and sports analysis, we are confronted with a correlation coefficient that dances tantalizingly at 0.5498565, with a p-value that winks mischievously at p < 0.05. Yes, you heard that right, dear readers! The numbers have spoken, and they've dared to suggest a synchronous tango between the clink of dishware and the roar of the gridiron.
As we sift through the ocean of variables and unravel the yarn of data, we are reminded that statistical analysis is not just about crunching numbers – it's about heeding the whispers of the unexpected, and recognizing that the most delightful discoveries often emerge from the most serendipitous of pairings. It's a reminder that in the magical world of research, no variable is too quirky, no correlation too whimsical, and no finding too outlandish.
So, come one, come all, as we venture into the wondrous world of statistical correlations, where household appliances and touchdowns converge in a kaleidoscope of numbers, and where the ordinary becomes extraordinary. The journey promises to be a whirlwind of statistical surprises, where the unlikeliest of bedfellows waltz through the data and where the unpredictable outcome is the only constant. Join us, dear readers, for this unprecedented expedition into the confluence of dishwashers and gridiron glory.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the clandestine connection between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' season wins, our research team employed a concoction of rigorous data collection and analysis methods sprinkled with a dash of whimsy. We embarked on this scientific quest armed with the formidable tools of internet sleuthing, statistical jiggery-pokery, and a healthy dose of unbounded curiosity.

Data Collection:
The first clause in our research symphony involved the harmonious compilation of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and Pro-Football-Reference.com. We cast our net wide, spanning the period from 2003 to 2022, to capture the nuanced fluctuations of dishwasher ownership and the ebbs and flows of the Chicago Bears' fortunes on the field. Our data trawling journey traversed the digital seas of internet databases, and truth be told, we initially stumbled upon this unusual correlation whilst trying to disentangle the enigmatic relationship between household appliances and sports victories. Who would have thought that we'd end up knee-deep in data about dishwashers and touchdown dances?

The Alchemical Cocktail of Statistical Analysis:
As any adept alchemist knows, brewing an elixir of statistical insight requires equal parts caution and audacity. Our research team applied a heady blend of correlation analysis, regression models, and time series techniques to distill the essence of interconnectedness between these seemingly distinct variables. With the precision of a scientist and the intuition of a fortune teller, we subjected the data to the unforgiving scrutiny of statistical tests, coaxing the numbers to divulge their secrets and possibly share a joke or two along the way.

Control Variables and Quirks of Research Fate:
In a world where the unexpected lurks around every statistical corner, we embraced the capricious nature of research by delicately balancing our analyses with a smorgasbord of control variables. We accounted for confounding factors such as the performance of opposing teams, weather conditions during game days, and perhaps even the cosmic alignment of celestial bodies over Soldier Field. After all, in the madcap circus of research, nothing is too bizarre to consider.

Ethical Considerations and Researcher Sanity:
Amidst the uproarious whirlwind of data manipulation and statistical acrobatics, our research team upheld the solemn covenant of scientific integrity and researcher sanity. We pledged allegiance to the sacred code of statistical transparency, ensuring that every step of our methodological odyssey was documented with the precision of a calligrapher and the humor of a stand-up comedian.

Why did the statistician bring a ladder to the football game?
Because he wanted to reach the high p-values!

In conclusion, our methodology dances on the edge of conventional research practice, daring to blend the esoteric arts of data collection and statistical analysis with a touch of lighthearted whimsy. As we delved into the enigma of dishwashers and football victories, we stood at the nexus of empirical inquiry and statistical tomfoolery, ready to unfurl the mystique of our findings for the discerning eyes of the academic world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dishwashers in Illinois and Season wins for the Chicago Bears. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.5498565, r-squared of 0.3023422, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Who's Dishin' Out Wins? A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' Season Success

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unconventional realms of sports and household appliances to investigate the potential link between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the season wins for the Chicago Bears. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, our research team found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5498565 and p < 0.05 over the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings challenge traditional notions of sports analysis and household economics, demonstrating the unexpected connections that can emerge when seemingly disparate factors are examined. Join us as we embark on a journey through the whimsical world of statistical correlations, where the clinking of dishes and the roar of the stadium converge in an unlikely dance of data.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
In the grand casino of statistical analysis, where the chips are data and the deck is shuffled with variables, we, the intrepid research team, have rolled the dice on a gambit of a study. Welcome to the unfolding saga of "Who's Dishin' Out Wins? A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' Season Success." It's a tale of two seemingly unrelated entities coming together in a dance of data that would make even the most stoic statistician wiggle with excitement.
But hold on to your lab coats, folks, for we are about to embark on an expedition into uncharted territory - where household appliances meet sports success, where dishwashers play a role in football fortunes, and where statistical correlations tread the fine line between the expected and the absurd. So, buckle up as we journey through the labyrinth of data, where the dishes are as clear as the outcome of a game and the touchdowns are as sparkling as a freshly scrubbed pot.
In the realm of statistical inquiry, the landscape is often littered with familiar pairings - the classic duets of supply and demand, income and expenditure, or cause and effect. Yet, nestled in the annals of empirical exploration, we find ourselves drawn to the peculiar magnetism of an unlikely pair - the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the triumphs of the Chicago Bears. Two entities, seemingly unrelated, converge in a spectacle of statistical intrigue that has left even our most seasoned researchers scratching their heads in bemusement.
The stage is set, the data is poised, and the game is afoot. As we peer into the realms of household economics and sports analysis, we are confronted with a correlation coefficient that dances tantalizingly at 0.5498565, with a p-value that winks mischievously at p < 0.05. Yes, you heard that right, dear readers! The numbers have spoken, and they've dared to suggest a synchronous tango between the clink of dishware and the roar of the gridiron.
As we sift through the ocean of variables and unravel the yarn of data, we are reminded that statistical analysis is not just about crunching numbers – it's about heeding the whispers of the unexpected, and recognizing that the most delightful discoveries often emerge from the most serendipitous of pairings. It's a reminder that in the magical world of research, no variable is too quirky, no correlation too whimsical, and no finding too outlandish.
So, come one, come all, as we venture into the wondrous world of statistical correlations, where household appliances and touchdowns converge in a kaleidoscope of numbers, and where the ordinary becomes extraordinary. The journey promises to be a whirlwind of statistical surprises, where the unlikeliest of bedfellows waltz through the data and where the unpredictable outcome is the only constant. Join us, dear readers, for this unprecedented expedition into the confluence of dishwashers and gridiron glory.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The moment of truth has arrived, and we are delighted to unveil the captivating findings of our intrepid expedition into the improbable connection between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' season wins. Brace yourselves, dear readers, for the results are as delightful and surprising as a perfectly-timed touchdown dance.

Our statistical analysis has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5498565, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' season wins. This implies that as the number of dishwashers in Illinois increases, the season wins for the Chicago Bears also tend to rise – a peculiar union of household chores and football fortunes that defies conventional wisdom.

In the captivating dance of statistical significance, our findings are further accentuated by an r-squared value of 0.3023422. This coefficient speaks volumes about the proportion of variation in the Chicago Bears' season wins that can be explained by the number of dishwashers in Illinois. Yes, you guessed it – it's more than just a mere dish-scrubbing revelation; it's an eruption of statistical significance that demands attention as it waltzes onto the scientific stage.

And to top it all off, the p-value of less than 0.05 shimmies onto the scene, signaling a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. This p-value is the confetti on our statistical celebration, a declaration that the correlation between dishwashers and the Chicago Bears' triumphs is not just a fluke – it's the real deal.

But hold on to your lab goggles, for we haven't even touched upon the visual spectacle encapsulated in Fig. 1. Our beloved scatterplot – akin to a celestial ballet of data points – illustrates the remarkably strong and positive correlation between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' season victories. It's a sight to behold, a symphony of dots that tell the enchanting tale of how the clink of dishes echoes in the cheers of victory at Soldier Field.

In conclusion, our findings challenge the boundaries of rational expectation, where the whimsical dance of dishwashers and football feats defies traditional logic. Join us as we revel in the sheer delight of uncovering unexpected connections between seemingly unrelated factors – for in the enchanting realm of statistical analysis, even the quirkiest of correlations can spark the brightest of revelations.

The whimsical world of statistical analysis beckons, where the whims meet the wisdom, and the improbable unearths the truly remarkable.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dishwashers in Illinois and Season wins for the Chicago Bears. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Who's Dishin' Out Wins? A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' Season Success

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unconventional realms of sports and household appliances to investigate the potential link between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the season wins for the Chicago Bears. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, our research team found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5498565 and p < 0.05 over the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings challenge traditional notions of sports analysis and household economics, demonstrating the unexpected connections that can emerge when seemingly disparate factors are examined. Join us as we embark on a journey through the whimsical world of statistical correlations, where the clinking of dishes and the roar of the stadium converge in an unlikely dance of data.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between household appliances and sports success has long been a topic of interest in the world of statistical analysis. Historically, researchers have sought to uncover the hidden dynamics between seemingly disparate entities, such as the number of dishwashers in a given region and the performance of a local sports team. As Smith et al. (2010) aptly noted in their seminal work, "Household Economics and Sports Success," the interplay between domestic technologies and athletic outcomes remains an enigmatic puzzle, ripe for exploration.
Doe and Jones (2015) further delved into the intriguing nexus between home amenities and sporting achievements in their comprehensive study, "Appliances and Touchdowns: A Statistical Odyssey." Their rigorous analysis unearthed compelling correlations between the prevalence of specific household devices and the triumphs of various sports teams. However, it is important to note that the specific link between dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' season wins has been a relatively uncharted territory in the realm of academic inquiry.
Leaping from the realm of academia to the realm of practical wisdom, "The Curious Case of Home Appliances and Sports" by Lorem and Ipsum (2018) offers a delightful exploration of the idiosyncratic connections that exist beyond the realm of traditional statistical modeling. The authors astutely observe that while the world of household appliances and sports may appear disparate, there is often an underlying syncopation that defies conventional understanding.
Steering now into the realm of creative literature, a trove of fictional works emerges that, while not grounded in empirical evidence, offers imaginative insights into the potential interplay between household amenities and athletic prowess. Books such as "The Quarterback's Dishwashing Dilemma" by Fictional Author A and "Clean Sweeps and Touchdowns: A Tale of Squeaky Clean Success" by Fictional Author B beckon readers into whimsical narratives where the clatter of kitchenware intertwines with the roar of the crowd.
Beyond the bounds of printed literature, cinematic endeavors such as "Dishwashers of Destiny" and "Gridiron Suds" have playfully toyed with the notion of unexpected connections between household chores and sports glory. While these cultural works may not offer empirical evidence, their imaginative forays into the amalgamation of dishwashing and football add a delightful layer of whimsy to the broader conversation.
As our expedition into the correlation between dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' season success unfolds, we are reminded that the journey of statistical inquiry is not merely about propounding serious hypotheses and conducting rigorous analyses. It also entails a dance with the absurd, a flirtation with the unexpected, and a willingness to embrace the delightfully wacky connections that emerge in the tapestry of data.

[[RESULTS]]
The moment of truth has arrived, and we are delighted to unveil the captivating findings of our intrepid expedition into the improbable connection between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' season wins. Brace yourselves, dear readers, for the results are as delightful and surprising as a perfectly-timed touchdown dance.
Our statistical analysis has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5498565, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' season wins. This implies that as the number of dishwashers in Illinois increases, the season wins for the Chicago Bears also tend to rise – a peculiar union of household chores and football fortunes that defies conventional wisdom.
In the captivating dance of statistical significance, our findings are further accentuated by an r-squared value of 0.3023422. This coefficient speaks volumes about the proportion of variation in the Chicago Bears' season wins that can be explained by the number of dishwashers in Illinois. Yes, you guessed it – it's more than just a mere dish-scrubbing revelation; it's an eruption of statistical significance that demands attention as it waltzes onto the scientific stage.
And to top it all off, the p-value of less than 0.05 shimmies onto the scene, signaling a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. This p-value is the confetti on our statistical celebration, a declaration that the correlation between dishwashers and the Chicago Bears' triumphs is not just a fluke – it's the real deal.
But hold on to your lab goggles, for we haven't even touched upon the visual spectacle encapsulated in Fig. 1. Our beloved scatterplot – akin to a celestial ballet of data points – illustrates the remarkably strong and positive correlation between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' season victories. It's a sight to behold, a symphony of dots that tell the enchanting tale of how the clink of dishes echoes in the cheers of victory at Soldier Field.
In conclusion, our findings challenge the boundaries of rational expectation, where the whimsical dance of dishwashers and football feats defies traditional logic. Join us as we revel in the sheer delight of uncovering unexpected connections between seemingly unrelated factors – for in the enchanting realm of statistical analysis, even the quirkiest of correlations can spark the brightest of revelations.
The whimsical world of statistical analysis beckons, where the whims meet the wisdom, and the improbable unearths the truly remarkable.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

Ah, the whimsical world of statistical correlations – where the clinking of dishes and the roar of the stadium converge in an unlikely dance of data. Our expedition into the relationship between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' season success has unearthed a marvelously peculiar union that challenges traditional notions of sports analysis and household economics.

In this fantastical foray, our findings support and even amplify the prior literature's speculation about the unexpected connections between household amenities and athletic prowess. Smith et al.'s (2010) resonant proclamation about the enigmatic puzzle of domestic technologies and athletic outcomes has, quite surprisingly, found resonance in our own investigation. Similarly, the spirited odyssey undertaken by Doe and Jones (2015) as they delved into the nexus between home appliances and sporting achievements seems to have inspired our very own delightful sojourn into the whimsical realm of dishwashers and football victories. Who would have thought that these seemingly unrelated variables could pirouette so gracefully in the realm of statistical relevance?

Our results, revealing a moderately strong positive relationship between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' season wins, stand as a gleaming testament to the improbable merger of household chores and football fortunes. The r-squared value of 0.3023422 – a veritable Cinderella of statistics – boldly proclaims the proportion of variation in the Chicago Bears' season wins explained by the number of dishwashers in Illinois. And let's not forget the p-value strutting onto the scene with all the confidence of a statistical superstar, affirming the bonafide significance of this correlation. It's as if the statistical cosmos has orchestrated a grand symphony in honor of these unlikeliest of companions.

Indeed, our scatterplot, akin to a celestial ballet of data points, presents the enchanting tale of how the clink of dishes resonates with the cheers of victory at Soldier Field. It's a narrative fit for the whimsy of Fictional Author A and the mirth of Fictional Author B, a story where the underdog variable – the humble dishwasher – dances into the limelight alongside football heroes.

As we heed Lorem and Ipsum's (2018) wisdom about the underlying syncopation that defies conventional understanding and embrace the absurd dance with unexpected connections, our research serves as a reminder that the whimsical can be wondrous, the curious can be compelling, and the most improbable of correlations can unveil the truly remarkable.

In this enchanting realm of statistical analysis, where the whims meet the wisdom and the improbable unearths the truly remarkable, we are left, much like the outcome of our study, with more questions than answers. But isn't that the very essence of scientific inquiry – to revel in the sheer delight of uncovering unexpected connections and allowing the quirkiest of correlations to spark the brightest of revelations? Who knew that the clatter of kitchenware and the roar of the crowd could blend so harmoniously in the tapestry of data?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dishwashers in Illinois and Season wins for the Chicago Bears. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Who's Dishin' Out Wins? A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' Season Success

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unconventional realms of sports and household appliances to investigate the potential link between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the season wins for the Chicago Bears. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, our research team found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5498565 and p < 0.05 over the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings challenge traditional notions of sports analysis and household economics, demonstrating the unexpected connections that can emerge when seemingly disparate factors are examined. Join us as we embark on a journey through the whimsical world of statistical correlations, where the clinking of dishes and the roar of the stadium converge in an unlikely dance of data.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
In the grand casino of statistical analysis, where the chips are data and the deck is shuffled with variables, we, the intrepid research team, have rolled the dice on a gambit of a study. Welcome to the unfolding saga of "Who's Dishin' Out Wins? A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' Season Success." It's a tale of two seemingly unrelated entities coming together in a dance of data that would make even the most stoic statistician wiggle with excitement.
But hold on to your lab coats, folks, for we are about to embark on an expedition into uncharted territory - where household appliances meet sports success, where dishwashers play a role in football fortunes, and where statistical correlations tread the fine line between the expected and the absurd. So, buckle up as we journey through the labyrinth of data, where the dishes are as clear as the outcome of a game and the touchdowns are as sparkling as a freshly scrubbed pot.
In the realm of statistical inquiry, the landscape is often littered with familiar pairings - the classic duets of supply and demand, income and expenditure, or cause and effect. Yet, nestled in the annals of empirical exploration, we find ourselves drawn to the peculiar magnetism of an unlikely pair - the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the triumphs of the Chicago Bears. Two entities, seemingly unrelated, converge in a spectacle of statistical intrigue that has left even our most seasoned researchers scratching their heads in bemusement.
The stage is set, the data is poised, and the game is afoot. As we peer into the realms of household economics and sports analysis, we are confronted with a correlation coefficient that dances tantalizingly at 0.5498565, with a p-value that winks mischievously at p < 0.05. Yes, you heard that right, dear readers! The numbers have spoken, and they've dared to suggest a synchronous tango between the clink of dishware and the roar of the gridiron.
As we sift through the ocean of variables and unravel the yarn of data, we are reminded that statistical analysis is not just about crunching numbers – it's about heeding the whispers of the unexpected, and recognizing that the most delightful discoveries often emerge from the most serendipitous of pairings. It's a reminder that in the magical world of research, no variable is too quirky, no correlation too whimsical, and no finding too outlandish.
So, come one, come all, as we venture into the wondrous world of statistical correlations, where household appliances and touchdowns converge in a kaleidoscope of numbers, and where the ordinary becomes extraordinary. The journey promises to be a whirlwind of statistical surprises, where the unlikeliest of bedfellows waltz through the data and where the unpredictable outcome is the only constant. Join us, dear readers, for this unprecedented expedition into the confluence of dishwashers and gridiron glory.

[[RESULTS]]
The moment of truth has arrived, and we are delighted to unveil the captivating findings of our intrepid expedition into the improbable connection between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' season wins. Brace yourselves, dear readers, for the results are as delightful and surprising as a perfectly-timed touchdown dance.
Our statistical analysis has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5498565, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' season wins. This implies that as the number of dishwashers in Illinois increases, the season wins for the Chicago Bears also tend to rise – a peculiar union of household chores and football fortunes that defies conventional wisdom.
In the captivating dance of statistical significance, our findings are further accentuated by an r-squared value of 0.3023422. This coefficient speaks volumes about the proportion of variation in the Chicago Bears' season wins that can be explained by the number of dishwashers in Illinois. Yes, you guessed it – it's more than just a mere dish-scrubbing revelation; it's an eruption of statistical significance that demands attention as it waltzes onto the scientific stage.
And to top it all off, the p-value of less than 0.05 shimmies onto the scene, signaling a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. This p-value is the confetti on our statistical celebration, a declaration that the correlation between dishwashers and the Chicago Bears' triumphs is not just a fluke – it's the real deal.
But hold on to your lab goggles, for we haven't even touched upon the visual spectacle encapsulated in Fig. 1. Our beloved scatterplot – akin to a celestial ballet of data points – illustrates the remarkably strong and positive correlation between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' season victories. It's a sight to behold, a symphony of dots that tell the enchanting tale of how the clink of dishes echoes in the cheers of victory at Soldier Field.
In conclusion, our findings challenge the boundaries of rational expectation, where the whimsical dance of dishwashers and football feats defies traditional logic. Join us as we revel in the sheer delight of uncovering unexpected connections between seemingly unrelated factors – for in the enchanting realm of statistical analysis, even the quirkiest of correlations can spark the brightest of revelations.
The whimsical world of statistical analysis beckons, where the whims meet the wisdom, and the improbable unearths the truly remarkable.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the grand symphony of statistical absurdity, where the unlikely pairings of household fixtures and sports prowess take center stage, we find ourselves at the end of a journey that has left our research team dazzled and delighted. The correlation coefficient of 0.5498565 between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' season wins has defied expectations and tickled our statistical sensibilities in the most unexpected of ways.

The r-squared value that cheekily nudges at 0.3023422 has whispered to us in the language of statistical significance, reminding us that even the most seemingly arbitrary variables can dance to the rhythm of empirical inquiry. And let's not forget the mischievous p-value, shimmying its way under the spotlight with a wink and a nod, proclaiming that this correlation is no statistical fluke – it's a real statistical touchdown.

And as our scatterplot unfurls its celestial ballet of data points, we're reminded that in the whimsical world of statistical analysis, the dance of correlation is as enchanting as it is confounding. It's a reminder that even in the most rigorous of pursuits, the sparkle of unexpected connections can illuminate the most unlikely of pathways.

So, dear readers, as we bid adieu to this glorious escapade into the fantastical realms of dishwashers and touchdowns, we are unequivocally confident – no, resolute – that no further research is needed in this area. The question of "Who's Dishin' Out Wins?" has been answered with a resounding statistical cheer, echoing through the hallowed halls of empirical wonder. The dance of dishwashers and touchdowns has spoken, and it's time for us to bask in the sheer delight of this whimsical statistical revelation.

In the whimsical world of research, where the absurd meets the empirical, and the statistics collide with the surreal, we have unraveled a tale that's as baffling as it is brilliant. Whimsy has met wisdom, and the results are as sparkling as a freshly scrubbed pot.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Who's Dishin' Out Wins? A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' Season Success. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Sports Appliance Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Who's Dishin' Out Wins? A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' Season Success. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Consortium for Appliance-Team Dynamics Research (CATDR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Who's Dishin' Out Wins? A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Dishwashers in Illinois and the Chicago Bears' Season Success with an abstract of This research paper delves into the unconventional realms of sports and household appliances to investigate the potential link between the number of dishwashers in Illinois and the season wins for the Chicago Bears. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, our research team found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5498565 and p < 0.05 over the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings challenge traditional notions of sports analysis and household economics, demonstrating the unexpected connections that can emerge when seemingly disparate factors are examined. Join us as we embark on a journey through the whimsical world of statistical correlations, where the clinking of dishes and the roar of the stadium converge in an unlikely dance of data.

ChatGPT:

dishwashers in Illinois, Chicago Bears season wins, statistical analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Pro-Football-Reference.com, correlation coefficient, household appliances, sports analysis, seasonal success, data analysis, statistical correlations

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of dishwashers in Illinois
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of dishwashers in Illinois
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of dishwashers in Illinois

Season wins for the Chicago Bears
Detailed data title: Number of season wins by the Chicago Bears
Source: Pro-Football-Reference.com
See what else correlates with Season wins for the Chicago Bears

Correlation r = 0.5498565 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.3023422 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 30.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Season wins for the Chicago Bears) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of dishwashers in Illinois) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.012. 0.0120166414271023480000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.55 in 1.2% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 83 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.14, 0.8 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of dishwashers in Illinois (Dishwashers)2077022170250502326020790215302004018800176101753018910186401747016900162701973019080155401597014390
Season wins for the Chicago Bears (Bears wins)7511137971181085635128863




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([20770,22170,25050,23260,20790,21530,20040,18800,17610,17530,18910,18640,17470,16900,16270,19730,19080,15540,15970,14390,])
array_2 = np.array([7,5,11,13,7,9,7,11,8,10,8,5,6,3,5,12,8,8,6,3,])
array_1_name = "The number of dishwashers in Illinois"
array_2_name = "Season wins for the Chicago Bears"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 3668 · Black Variable ID: 7442 · Red Variable ID: 19653
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0