about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,216 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Wabash, Indiana and the second variable is Customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications.  The chart goes from 1994 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the air cleared in Wabash, it also cleared people's minds, making them more aware of the subpar service provided by Frontier Communications. It seems like Frontier's connection with customer satisfaction was as unstable as their internet connection!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image representing the scene described using the style of a TIME magazine cover. The cover should depict a serene local park scene in Wabash, Indiana, with families having picnics, children playing, and couples taking leisurely strolls. In contrast, the local Frontier Communications office is shown to be quieter, with fewer people waiting in line or calling customer service. A subtle visual cue should indicate the decrease in air pollution, highlighting the cause of people spending more time outdoors and the subsequent decrease in customer interactions and services at the office. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Wabash, Indiana and Customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Macabre A TIME magazine cover image Cyber folk Sci-fi fantacy Art nouveau
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Wabash, Indiana and Customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications, in the following situation: As air pollution decreased in Wabash, Indiana, people started spending more time outside, leading to fewer hours spent on the phone with customer service, and subsequently, lower customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Wabash, Indiana, the air is clearer and more people are seen enjoying the outdoors in the local park. Families are having picnics, children are playing, and couples are taking leisurely strolls. At the same time, the local Frontier Communications office is quieter, with fewer people waiting in line or calling customer service. The decrease in air pollution has led to people spending less time indoors and consequently, lower customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications due to reduced interactions and services.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In Wabash, Indiana, the air is clearer and more people are seen enjoying the outdoors in the local park. Families are having picnics, children are playing, and couples are taking leisurely strolls. At the same time, the local Frontier Communications office is quieter, with fewer people waiting in line or calling customer service. The decrease in air pollution has led to people spending less time indoors and consequently, lower customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications due to reduced interactions and services. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image representing the scene described using the style of a TIME magazine cover. The cover should depict a serene local park scene in Wabash, Indiana, with families having picnics, children playing, and couples taking leisurely strolls. In contrast, the local Frontier Communications office is shown to be quieter, with fewer people waiting in line or calling customer service. A subtle visual cue should indicate the decrease in air pollution, highlighting the cause of people spending more time outdoors and the subsequent decrease in customer interactions and services at the office.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Wabash, Indiana caused Customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Airborne Aggravation: Analyzing the Amusing Association Between Air Pollution in Wabash and Customer Contentment with Frontier Communications

Journal of Environmental Humor and Ecological Irony

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wabash, Indiana and Customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and American Customer Satisfaction Index to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7882932 and p < 0.01 for 1994 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Airborne Aggravation: Analyzing the Amusing Association Between Air Pollution in Wabash and Customer Contentment with Frontier Communications

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a peculiar investigation into the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Wabash, Indiana, and customer satisfaction with the telecommunications services provided by Frontier Communications. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, our research team embarked on this whimsical quest to unravel the intriguing link between environmental factors and consumer sentiments. Our findings reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.7882932 with a significance level of p < 0.01 over the period spanning from 1994 to 2021. This unexpected connection prompts lively discussions about the potential influence of air quality on the whims and woes of customer satisfaction in the digital age. As we delve into the statistical weeds, we hope to tickle the fancy of researchers and practitioners alike with our whimsical exploration of this comical correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wabash, Indiana and Customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Airborne Aggravation: Analyzing the Amusing Association Between Air Pollution in Wabash and Customer Contentment with Frontier Communications

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a peculiar investigation into the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Wabash, Indiana, and customer satisfaction with the telecommunications services provided by Frontier Communications. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, our research team embarked on this whimsical quest to unravel the intriguing link between environmental factors and consumer sentiments. Our findings reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.7882932 with a significance level of p < 0.01 over the period spanning from 1994 to 2021. This unexpected connection prompts lively discussions about the potential influence of air quality on the whims and woes of customer satisfaction in the digital age. As we delve into the statistical weeds, we hope to tickle the fancy of researchers and practitioners alike with our whimsical exploration of this comical correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

Picture this: a cloud of air pollution hovering over the quaint town of Wabash, Indiana, making its way to the homes and businesses of its inhabitants. Meanwhile, on the other end of the spectrum, disgruntled customers are venting their frustrations with their telecommunications services, quite possibly with Frontier Communications. Now, you may be thinking, "What on Earth do these two seemingly unrelated phenomena have to do with each other?" Well, grab your academic seatbelts, because we are about to embark on a wild and wacky journey through the zany realm of statistical analysis and quirky correlations.

In our modern world, where data reigns supreme and customer satisfaction is the holy grail of businesses, it is crucial to uncover the factors that may influence the whims and woes of consumer contentment. With this in mind, our fearless research team set out to untangle the web of curious connections between air pollution levels and customer satisfaction in Wabash, Indiana. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, we sought to shed light on this unlikely duo and the extent of their relationship. With one foot in the environmental realm and the other in the customer service domain, our research aims to entertain and enlighten, all while sifting through the statistical maze.

As we delve into this uncharted territory where environmental science meets consumer behavior, we invite you to join us on this rollicking ride through the twists and turns of data analysis. From the peculiar to the preposterous, our findings promise to tickle the fancy of researchers and practitioners alike. So, buckle up and prepare for a whimsical exploration of this comical correlation, because in the world of academia, sometimes truth is indeed stranger than fiction.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wabash, Indiana and Customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Airborne Aggravation: Analyzing the Amusing Association Between Air Pollution in Wabash and Customer Contentment with Frontier Communications

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a peculiar investigation into the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Wabash, Indiana, and customer satisfaction with the telecommunications services provided by Frontier Communications. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, our research team embarked on this whimsical quest to unravel the intriguing link between environmental factors and consumer sentiments. Our findings reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.7882932 with a significance level of p < 0.01 over the period spanning from 1994 to 2021. This unexpected connection prompts lively discussions about the potential influence of air quality on the whims and woes of customer satisfaction in the digital age. As we delve into the statistical weeds, we hope to tickle the fancy of researchers and practitioners alike with our whimsical exploration of this comical correlation.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Picture this: a cloud of air pollution hovering over the quaint town of Wabash, Indiana, making its way to the homes and businesses of its inhabitants. Meanwhile, on the other end of the spectrum, disgruntled customers are venting their frustrations with their telecommunications services, quite possibly with Frontier Communications. Now, you may be thinking, "What on Earth do these two seemingly unrelated phenomena have to do with each other?" Well, grab your academic seatbelts, because we are about to embark on a wild and wacky journey through the zany realm of statistical analysis and quirky correlations.
In our modern world, where data reigns supreme and customer satisfaction is the holy grail of businesses, it is crucial to uncover the factors that may influence the whims and woes of consumer contentment. With this in mind, our fearless research team set out to untangle the web of curious connections between air pollution levels and customer satisfaction in Wabash, Indiana. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, we sought to shed light on this unlikely duo and the extent of their relationship. With one foot in the environmental realm and the other in the customer service domain, our research aims to entertain and enlighten, all while sifting through the statistical maze.
As we delve into this uncharted territory where environmental science meets consumer behavior, we invite you to join us on this rollicking ride through the twists and turns of data analysis. From the peculiar to the preposterous, our findings promise to tickle the fancy of researchers and practitioners alike. So, buckle up and prepare for a whimsical exploration of this comical correlation, because in the world of academia, sometimes truth is indeed stranger than fiction.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The analysis of the perplexing connection between air pollution in Wabash, Indiana, and customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications has captivated the attention of researchers and practitioners alike. Smith et al. (2015) provide compelling insights into the detrimental effects of air pollution on human health, laying the groundwork for examining its potential influence on consumer behavior. Moreover, Doe and Jones (2018) delve into the complexities of customer satisfaction, highlighting the multifaceted nature of this elusive phenomenon.

Turn the page to a more whimsical aspect of our literature review, where we draw inspiration from non-fiction books relevant to the topic, such as "The Air We Breathe" by Hill (2019), and "Customer Delight: A Humorous Approach" by Joyful (2020). Mixing a dash of humor with hard-hitting research, we take a whimsical turn as we consider the potential impact of air pollution on customer satisfaction. Can the noxious fumes of industry pop the bubble of consumer contentment? Our findings suggest a harmonious symphony of statistical significance and punchy puns.

But wait, the rabbit hole goes deeper as we draw unexpected parallels from fiction. In "Cloudy with a Chance of Frowns" by Gray and Gloom (2017), the whimsical world of air pollution collides with the realm of customer discontent. Are disgruntled customers raining on Frontier Communications' parade? The plot thickens as we throw in a board game twist, with inspiration from "Trouble in Telecommunications Town" and "Polluted Pursuit: The Search for Satisfaction."

As we bask in the glow of our comical correlation, we invite fellow researchers and practitioners to join us on this rollicking ride through the land of whimsical analysis. After all, when it comes to the amalgamation of air pollution and customer satisfaction, the data may be serious, but the journey is certainly anything but.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wabash, Indiana and Customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and American Customer Satisfaction Index . You used data from 1994 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Airborne Aggravation: Analyzing the Amusing Association Between Air Pollution in Wabash and Customer Contentment with Frontier Communications

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a peculiar investigation into the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Wabash, Indiana, and customer satisfaction with the telecommunications services provided by Frontier Communications. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, our research team embarked on this whimsical quest to unravel the intriguing link between environmental factors and consumer sentiments. Our findings reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.7882932 with a significance level of p < 0.01 over the period spanning from 1994 to 2021. This unexpected connection prompts lively discussions about the potential influence of air quality on the whims and woes of customer satisfaction in the digital age. As we delve into the statistical weeds, we hope to tickle the fancy of researchers and practitioners alike with our whimsical exploration of this comical correlation.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Picture this: a cloud of air pollution hovering over the quaint town of Wabash, Indiana, making its way to the homes and businesses of its inhabitants. Meanwhile, on the other end of the spectrum, disgruntled customers are venting their frustrations with their telecommunications services, quite possibly with Frontier Communications. Now, you may be thinking, "What on Earth do these two seemingly unrelated phenomena have to do with each other?" Well, grab your academic seatbelts, because we are about to embark on a wild and wacky journey through the zany realm of statistical analysis and quirky correlations.
In our modern world, where data reigns supreme and customer satisfaction is the holy grail of businesses, it is crucial to uncover the factors that may influence the whims and woes of consumer contentment. With this in mind, our fearless research team set out to untangle the web of curious connections between air pollution levels and customer satisfaction in Wabash, Indiana. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, we sought to shed light on this unlikely duo and the extent of their relationship. With one foot in the environmental realm and the other in the customer service domain, our research aims to entertain and enlighten, all while sifting through the statistical maze.
As we delve into this uncharted territory where environmental science meets consumer behavior, we invite you to join us on this rollicking ride through the twists and turns of data analysis. From the peculiar to the preposterous, our findings promise to tickle the fancy of researchers and practitioners alike. So, buckle up and prepare for a whimsical exploration of this comical correlation, because in the world of academia, sometimes truth is indeed stranger than fiction.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Statistical Buffet:
To munch on this puzzling problem, we opted for a smorgasbord of statistical methods, hoping to cook up some tasty results. We whipped out regression analysis to sauté the relationship between air pollution levels (in the form of particulate matter, ozone, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide) and customer satisfaction scores with Frontier Communications. Like a culinary wizard, we also added a pinch of time-series analysis to our cauldron, simmering the data from 1994 to 2021 to identify any seasonal patterns or long-term trends. This statistical feast proved to be a delightful adventure, seasoned with intrigue and sprinkled with absurdity.

Mining the Internet for Ingredients:
In our quest to uncover the tantalizing truth behind this odd pairing of air pollution and customer satisfaction, we combed through the vast internet landscape like curious digital prospectors. With the Environmental Protection Agency serving as our treasure trove of air quality data, we unearthed a myriad of measurements, from inhalable particulate matter to gaseous pollutants, all while dodging the digital tumbleweeds. Meanwhile, the American Customer Satisfaction Index emerged as the source of savory satisfaction scores, providing us with the delectable feedback of Frontier Communications' customers. We then seasoned our data stew with a sprinkle of social media sentiment analysis, tracking the online chatter about air quality and telecom troubles in Wabash, adding a touch of modern flair to our eclectic mix of data sources.

The Grand Data Symphony:
Once we had gathered our statistical ingredients and simmered them to perfection, it was time to compose a grand symphony of data analysis. We harmonized the air pollution metrics with the customer satisfaction scores, crafting a whimsical melody of correlation coefficients and p-values. Our fantastical orchestra of statistics danced and twirled, revealing a surprisingly robust relationship between the two seemingly disparate elements. It was as though the data itself had donned a pair of jester's shoes and regaled us with a merry jig of interconnectedness.

Testing the Hypotheses:
With our hodgepodge of data and statistical techniques in hand, we proceeded to test our hypotheses with the zeal of mad scientists in a laboratory of laughter. Our primary hypothesis, that higher levels of air pollution in Wabash, Indiana, would lead to lower customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications, was greeted with a resounding "Eureka!" as our results pranced and pirouetted in agreement. The absurdity of this connection only added to the delight of our findings, as if the data itself had decided to showcase its ironic sense of humor.

Adventures in Quirkland:
In this unusually whimsical expedition into the realm of empirical exploration, we encountered peculiar quirks and comical surprises along the way. Our methodology might have raised a few eyebrows, with its blend of statistical sorcery and digital safari, but rest assured, the results are as legitimate as they are lighthearted. So, grab your academic snorkel and dive headfirst into our data ocean of folly, because when it comes to the surreal world of statistical research, there's always room for an extra sprinkle of absurdity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wabash, Indiana and Customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and American Customer Satisfaction Index .

For the time period 1994 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7882932, r-squared of 0.6214062, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Airborne Aggravation: Analyzing the Amusing Association Between Air Pollution in Wabash and Customer Contentment with Frontier Communications

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a peculiar investigation into the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Wabash, Indiana, and customer satisfaction with the telecommunications services provided by Frontier Communications. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, our research team embarked on this whimsical quest to unravel the intriguing link between environmental factors and consumer sentiments. Our findings reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.7882932 with a significance level of p < 0.01 over the period spanning from 1994 to 2021. This unexpected connection prompts lively discussions about the potential influence of air quality on the whims and woes of customer satisfaction in the digital age. As we delve into the statistical weeds, we hope to tickle the fancy of researchers and practitioners alike with our whimsical exploration of this comical correlation.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
Picture this: a cloud of air pollution hovering over the quaint town of Wabash, Indiana, making its way to the homes and businesses of its inhabitants. Meanwhile, on the other end of the spectrum, disgruntled customers are venting their frustrations with their telecommunications services, quite possibly with Frontier Communications. Now, you may be thinking, "What on Earth do these two seemingly unrelated phenomena have to do with each other?" Well, grab your academic seatbelts, because we are about to embark on a wild and wacky journey through the zany realm of statistical analysis and quirky correlations.
In our modern world, where data reigns supreme and customer satisfaction is the holy grail of businesses, it is crucial to uncover the factors that may influence the whims and woes of consumer contentment. With this in mind, our fearless research team set out to untangle the web of curious connections between air pollution levels and customer satisfaction in Wabash, Indiana. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, we sought to shed light on this unlikely duo and the extent of their relationship. With one foot in the environmental realm and the other in the customer service domain, our research aims to entertain and enlighten, all while sifting through the statistical maze.
As we delve into this uncharted territory where environmental science meets consumer behavior, we invite you to join us on this rollicking ride through the twists and turns of data analysis. From the peculiar to the preposterous, our findings promise to tickle the fancy of researchers and practitioners alike. So, buckle up and prepare for a whimsical exploration of this comical correlation, because in the world of academia, sometimes truth is indeed stranger than fiction.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our team of intrepid researchers uncovered a remarkably robust correlation between air pollution levels in Wabash, Indiana, and customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications. The correlation coefficient of 0.7882932, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.6214062, and a significance level of p < 0.01, not only piqued our interest but also tickled our statistical fancy in unexpected ways.

Fig. 1 showcases the scatterplot, which vividly illustrates the strong correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. It’s as if the data itself couldn’t resist the magnetic pull of this quirky relationship and decided to jump into a whimsical waltz of statistical significance.

The findings from our analysis beg the question: could the influx of air pollution particles floating through the Wabash air be whispering discontent into the ears of Frontier Communications' customers? It seems that the fabled winds of change may be carrying more than just environmental flotsam; they may also be ruffling the feathers of consumer contentment in surprising ways.

In unraveling and embracing this unlikely alliance between air pollution and customer satisfaction, we are pleased to have unearthed this comical correlation that not only raises eyebrows but also elicits a chuckle or two. Our results add a dash of playful play-by-play to the tapestry of academic research, proving that sometimes the most unexpected findings can be the source of scholarly amusement.

As the data dances to the beat of this curious correlation, our minds are filled with the curiosity of what other zany relationships may be lurking in the depths of statistical analysis. With a nod to the whimsical nature of our research, we invite fellow scholars and practitioners to join us in this merry escapade through the statistical funhouse, where truth becomes the jester and findings take on a life of their own. Stay tuned for the next act of this whimsical saga, as we continue to uncover unlikely links in the labyrinth of data and delight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wabash, Indiana and Customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Airborne Aggravation: Analyzing the Amusing Association Between Air Pollution in Wabash and Customer Contentment with Frontier Communications

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a peculiar investigation into the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Wabash, Indiana, and customer satisfaction with the telecommunications services provided by Frontier Communications. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, our research team embarked on this whimsical quest to unravel the intriguing link between environmental factors and consumer sentiments. Our findings reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.7882932 with a significance level of p < 0.01 over the period spanning from 1994 to 2021. This unexpected connection prompts lively discussions about the potential influence of air quality on the whims and woes of customer satisfaction in the digital age. As we delve into the statistical weeds, we hope to tickle the fancy of researchers and practitioners alike with our whimsical exploration of this comical correlation.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The analysis of the perplexing connection between air pollution in Wabash, Indiana, and customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications has captivated the attention of researchers and practitioners alike. Smith et al. (2015) provide compelling insights into the detrimental effects of air pollution on human health, laying the groundwork for examining its potential influence on consumer behavior. Moreover, Doe and Jones (2018) delve into the complexities of customer satisfaction, highlighting the multifaceted nature of this elusive phenomenon.
Turn the page to a more whimsical aspect of our literature review, where we draw inspiration from non-fiction books relevant to the topic, such as "The Air We Breathe" by Hill (2019), and "Customer Delight: A Humorous Approach" by Joyful (2020). Mixing a dash of humor with hard-hitting research, we take a whimsical turn as we consider the potential impact of air pollution on customer satisfaction. Can the noxious fumes of industry pop the bubble of consumer contentment? Our findings suggest a harmonious symphony of statistical significance and punchy puns.
But wait, the rabbit hole goes deeper as we draw unexpected parallels from fiction. In "Cloudy with a Chance of Frowns" by Gray and Gloom (2017), the whimsical world of air pollution collides with the realm of customer discontent. Are disgruntled customers raining on Frontier Communications' parade? The plot thickens as we throw in a board game twist, with inspiration from "Trouble in Telecommunications Town" and "Polluted Pursuit: The Search for Satisfaction."
As we bask in the glow of our comical correlation, we invite fellow researchers and practitioners to join us on this rollicking ride through the land of whimsical analysis. After all, when it comes to the amalgamation of air pollution and customer satisfaction, the data may be serious, but the journey is certainly anything but.

[[RESULTS]]
Our team of intrepid researchers uncovered a remarkably robust correlation between air pollution levels in Wabash, Indiana, and customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications. The correlation coefficient of 0.7882932, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.6214062, and a significance level of p < 0.01, not only piqued our interest but also tickled our statistical fancy in unexpected ways.
Fig. 1 showcases the scatterplot, which vividly illustrates the strong correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. It’s as if the data itself couldn’t resist the magnetic pull of this quirky relationship and decided to jump into a whimsical waltz of statistical significance.
The findings from our analysis beg the question: could the influx of air pollution particles floating through the Wabash air be whispering discontent into the ears of Frontier Communications' customers? It seems that the fabled winds of change may be carrying more than just environmental flotsam; they may also be ruffling the feathers of consumer contentment in surprising ways.
In unraveling and embracing this unlikely alliance between air pollution and customer satisfaction, we are pleased to have unearthed this comical correlation that not only raises eyebrows but also elicits a chuckle or two. Our results add a dash of playful play-by-play to the tapestry of academic research, proving that sometimes the most unexpected findings can be the source of scholarly amusement.
As the data dances to the beat of this curious correlation, our minds are filled with the curiosity of what other zany relationships may be lurking in the depths of statistical analysis. With a nod to the whimsical nature of our research, we invite fellow scholars and practitioners to join us in this merry escapade through the statistical funhouse, where truth becomes the jester and findings take on a life of their own. Stay tuned for the next act of this whimsical saga, as we continue to uncover unlikely links in the labyrinth of data and delight.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our analysis whisk us into a whimsical world where the seemingly unrelated variables of air pollution levels in Wabash, Indiana, and customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications engage in a lively dance of statistical significance. Our findings not only support prior research on the detrimental effects of air pollution on human health (Smith et al., 2015), but they also add a playful twist to the exploration of its potential influence on consumer sentiments. It's as if the air particles themselves decided to partake in a comical caper of correlation, leading researchers and practitioners alike on a merry romp through the statistical wonderland.

Drawing inspiration from non-fiction tomes such as "The Air We Breathe" by Hill (2019) and "Customer Delight: A Humorous Approach" by Joyful (2020), we find that the serious nature of data can be enlivened with a sprinkling of whimsy. Our results echo the entertaining insights of these works, demonstrating that even the most peculiar correlations can provoke scholarly amusement.

As we turn the page to the unexpected parallels from fiction and board games, we are simultaneously bemused and intrigued by the notion that disgruntled customers may indeed be "raining on Frontier Communications' parade" as depicted in "Cloudy with a Chance of Frowns" by Gray and Gloom (2017). Our findings suggest that the whimsical world of air pollution may indeed collide with the realm of customer discontent in a manner that not only tickles the fancy but also begs further investigation. Perhaps there's merit in exploring the "Polluted Pursuit: The Search for Satisfaction" after all.

Extricating ourselves from the maze of mirth, we cannot help but marvel at the curious correlation that has blossomed from our analysis. Our results not only raise eyebrows but also elicit a chuckle or two, affirming that sometimes the most peculiar findings can be the source of scholarly amusement. This comical correlation has not only enriched our understanding of the potential influence of environmental factors on consumer sentiments but has also enlivened the academic discourse with a playful play-by-play that adds a delightful dash of whimsy to the tapestry of research.

With a nod to the whimsical nature of our journey through this statistical funhouse, we extend a tongue-in-cheek invitation to fellow scholars and practitioners to join us in further escapades through the labyrinth of data and delight. After all, in the realm of research, where truth becomes the jester and findings take on a life of their own, who's to say where the next laugh-out-loud discovery may be hiding? Stay tuned for the next act of this whimsical saga as we continue to unearth zany relationships and unearth unlikely links in the merry madness of statistical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wabash, Indiana and Customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Airborne Aggravation: Analyzing the Amusing Association Between Air Pollution in Wabash and Customer Contentment with Frontier Communications

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a peculiar investigation into the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Wabash, Indiana, and customer satisfaction with the telecommunications services provided by Frontier Communications. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, our research team embarked on this whimsical quest to unravel the intriguing link between environmental factors and consumer sentiments. Our findings reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.7882932 with a significance level of p < 0.01 over the period spanning from 1994 to 2021. This unexpected connection prompts lively discussions about the potential influence of air quality on the whims and woes of customer satisfaction in the digital age. As we delve into the statistical weeds, we hope to tickle the fancy of researchers and practitioners alike with our whimsical exploration of this comical correlation.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Picture this: a cloud of air pollution hovering over the quaint town of Wabash, Indiana, making its way to the homes and businesses of its inhabitants. Meanwhile, on the other end of the spectrum, disgruntled customers are venting their frustrations with their telecommunications services, quite possibly with Frontier Communications. Now, you may be thinking, "What on Earth do these two seemingly unrelated phenomena have to do with each other?" Well, grab your academic seatbelts, because we are about to embark on a wild and wacky journey through the zany realm of statistical analysis and quirky correlations.
In our modern world, where data reigns supreme and customer satisfaction is the holy grail of businesses, it is crucial to uncover the factors that may influence the whims and woes of consumer contentment. With this in mind, our fearless research team set out to untangle the web of curious connections between air pollution levels and customer satisfaction in Wabash, Indiana. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, we sought to shed light on this unlikely duo and the extent of their relationship. With one foot in the environmental realm and the other in the customer service domain, our research aims to entertain and enlighten, all while sifting through the statistical maze.
As we delve into this uncharted territory where environmental science meets consumer behavior, we invite you to join us on this rollicking ride through the twists and turns of data analysis. From the peculiar to the preposterous, our findings promise to tickle the fancy of researchers and practitioners alike. So, buckle up and prepare for a whimsical exploration of this comical correlation, because in the world of academia, sometimes truth is indeed stranger than fiction.

[[RESULTS]]
Our team of intrepid researchers uncovered a remarkably robust correlation between air pollution levels in Wabash, Indiana, and customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications. The correlation coefficient of 0.7882932, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.6214062, and a significance level of p < 0.01, not only piqued our interest but also tickled our statistical fancy in unexpected ways.
Fig. 1 showcases the scatterplot, which vividly illustrates the strong correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. It’s as if the data itself couldn’t resist the magnetic pull of this quirky relationship and decided to jump into a whimsical waltz of statistical significance.
The findings from our analysis beg the question: could the influx of air pollution particles floating through the Wabash air be whispering discontent into the ears of Frontier Communications' customers? It seems that the fabled winds of change may be carrying more than just environmental flotsam; they may also be ruffling the feathers of consumer contentment in surprising ways.
In unraveling and embracing this unlikely alliance between air pollution and customer satisfaction, we are pleased to have unearthed this comical correlation that not only raises eyebrows but also elicits a chuckle or two. Our results add a dash of playful play-by-play to the tapestry of academic research, proving that sometimes the most unexpected findings can be the source of scholarly amusement.
As the data dances to the beat of this curious correlation, our minds are filled with the curiosity of what other zany relationships may be lurking in the depths of statistical analysis. With a nod to the whimsical nature of our research, we invite fellow scholars and practitioners to join us in this merry escapade through the statistical funhouse, where truth becomes the jester and findings take on a life of their own. Stay tuned for the next act of this whimsical saga, as we continue to uncover unlikely links in the labyrinth of data and delight.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our whimsical journey through the land of statistical anomalies and comical correlations has illuminated the remarkably robust link between air pollution in Wabash, Indiana, and the wily world of customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications. As we draw the curtain on this zany exploration, it is clear that the winds of change may be carrying more than just environmental flotsam; they may also be ruffling the feathers of consumer contentment in unexpected ways. It seems the influx of air pollution particles is not just whispering discontent into the ears of Frontier Communications' customers but perhaps blowing a raspberry or two as well.

Our findings not only add a dash of playful play-by-play to the tapestry of academic research but also reaffirm the whimsical nature of statistical analysis. The unexpected connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena prompts lively discussions and elicits a chuckle or two, proving that sometimes the most eccentric findings can be the source of scholarly amusement.

As we bid adieu to this merry escapade through the statistical funhouse, it is safe to say that no more research is needed in this particular area of study. After all, sometimes the truth is indeed stranger than fiction, and in this case, it's also a source of scholarly entertainment. So, with a nod to the whimsical nature of our research, we invite fellow scholars and practitioners to revel in the merry mayhem of statistical exploration and to embrace the unexpected with open arms. Onward to new adventures in academia, where reality continues to astonish and amuse in equal measure!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Airborne Aggravation: Analyzing the Amusing Association Between Air Pollution in Wabash and Customer Contentment with Frontier Communications. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Environmental Humor and Ecological Irony


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Airborne Aggravation: Analyzing the Amusing Association Between Air Pollution in Wabash and Customer Contentment with Frontier Communications. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

American Society for Comedic Environmental Epidemiology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Airborne Aggravation: Analyzing the Amusing Association Between Air Pollution in Wabash and Customer Contentment with Frontier Communications with an abstract of This paper presents a peculiar investigation into the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Wabash, Indiana, and customer satisfaction with the telecommunications services provided by Frontier Communications. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, our research team embarked on this whimsical quest to unravel the intriguing link between environmental factors and consumer sentiments. Our findings reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.7882932 with a significance level of p < 0.01 over the period spanning from 1994 to 2021. This unexpected connection prompts lively discussions about the potential influence of air quality on the whims and woes of customer satisfaction in the digital age. As we delve into the statistical weeds, we hope to tickle the fancy of researchers and practitioners alike with our whimsical exploration of this comical correlation.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, customer satisfaction, Wabash Indiana, Frontier Communications, telecommunications services, environmental factors, correlation coefficient, consumer sentiments, air quality, statistical analysis, digital age

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Wabash, Indiana
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Wabash, IN
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Wabash, Indiana

Customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications
Source: American Customer Satisfaction Index
See what else correlates with Customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications

Correlation r = 0.7882932 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6214062 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 62.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Wabash, Indiana) over the 28 years from 1994 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.3E-7. 0.0000006321656733618717000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.79 in 6.3E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,581,864 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 27 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 27 because we have two variables measured over a period of 28 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.59, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air pollution in Wabash, Indiana (Bad air quality days)0.1002870.1412640.1267610.07202220.08169010.1191140.03591160.03305780.08011050.02873560.01146130.0474860.0030030.05898880.0029411800.005602240.02083330.06760560.005665720.005952380.005586590.01440920.003012050.0138122000.00276243
Customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications (Consumer Satisfaction)79838076767470717473656664667068707066717170686666656565




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.100287,0.141264,0.126761,0.0720222,0.0816901,0.119114,0.0359116,0.0330578,0.0801105,0.0287356,0.0114613,0.047486,0.003003,0.0589888,0.00294118,0,0.00560224,0.0208333,0.0676056,0.00566572,0.00595238,0.00558659,0.0144092,0.00301205,0.0138122,0,0,0.00276243,])
array_2 = np.array([79,83,80,76,76,74,70,71,74,73,65,66,64,66,70,68,70,70,66,71,71,70,68,66,66,65,65,65,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Wabash, Indiana"
array_2_name = "Customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 3216 · Black Variable ID: 22271 · Red Variable ID: 19860
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0