about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,178 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of private detectives in Delaware and the second variable is Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of private detectives in Delaware increased, so did the demand for sneaky ways to purchase toilet paper undetected. These detectives were on the case, following leads to the best and most covert toilet paper suppliers. It became a game of cat and mouse, with TP enthusiasts trying to outsmart the investigators in a high-stakes quest for bathroom tissue. Little did the detectives know, they were inadvertently wiping out the competition for the top spot in where to buy toilet paper search results.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that combines the following scene in a [Cutesy art illustration] style: "In downtown Wilmington, Delaware, a group of private detectives meet at a bustling coffee shop. They are chatting animatedly, surrounded by steaming cups of coffee and stacks of files, discussing the surge in cases they've been handling lately. Meanwhile, at a nearby grocery store, shelves are almost empty as people frantically search for toilet paper, with many simultaneously googling "where to buy toilet paper" on their phones. The scene is filled with a sense of urgency and activity, capturing the contrast between the detectives' calm conversation and the chaotic search for essential supplies." The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of private detectives in Delaware and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Charcoal Charcoal Concept art 3D Pixar Style Cutsy art illustration
ChatGPT: Cutsy art illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of private detectives in Delaware and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper', in the following situation: Because the increase in private detectives led to more suspicious behavior, causing people to stockpile toilet paper. Curious minds need a lot of TP!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In downtown Wilmington, Delaware, a group of private detectives meet at a coffee shop, discussing their recent surge in cases. Meanwhile, at a nearby grocery store, shelves are empty as people frantically search for toilet paper, with many simultaneously googling "where to buy toilet paper" on their phones.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cutsy art illustration ] and depicting this scene: In downtown Wilmington, Delaware, a group of private detectives meet at a coffee shop, discussing their recent surge in cases. Meanwhile, at a nearby grocery store, shelves are empty as people frantically search for toilet paper, with many simultaneously googling "where to buy toilet paper" on their phones. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that combines the following scene in a [Cutesy art illustration] style: "In downtown Wilmington, Delaware, a group of private detectives meet at a bustling coffee shop. They are chatting animatedly, surrounded by steaming cups of coffee and stacks of files, discussing the surge in cases they've been handling lately. Meanwhile, at a nearby grocery store, shelves are almost empty as people frantically search for toilet paper, with many simultaneously googling "where to buy toilet paper" on their phones. The scene is filled with a sense of urgency and activity, capturing the contrast between the detectives' calm conversation and the chaotic search for essential supplies."

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in The number of private detectives in Delaware positively influenced where to buy toilet paper (Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper').\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Surveillance of Sudden Spikes: A Statistical Examination of the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Delaware and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Toilet Paper'

The Journal of Quirky Investigations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Delaware and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7742851 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Surveillance of Sudden Spikes: A Statistical Examination of the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Delaware and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Toilet Paper'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the number of private detectives in Delaware and the volume of Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough statistical analysis covering the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.7742851, coupled with a robust statistical significance (p < 0.01). Our research sheds light on the unexpected link between the surveillance industry and household consumables, offering an amusing yet thought-provoking insight into societal behavior and market trends.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Delaware and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Surveillance of Sudden Spikes: A Statistical Examination of the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Delaware and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Toilet Paper'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the number of private detectives in Delaware and the volume of Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough statistical analysis covering the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.7742851, coupled with a robust statistical significance (p < 0.01). Our research sheds light on the unexpected link between the surveillance industry and household consumables, offering an amusing yet thought-provoking insight into societal behavior and market trends.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The seemingly disparate realms of private investigation and consumer purchasing patterns have collided in a peculiar intersection, prompting an inquiry into the relationship between these two seemingly unrelated spheres. In this study, we aim to unravel the enigmatic connection between the number of private detectives in the state of Delaware and the frequency of Google searches for the elusive commodity of toilet paper. While some may jest that such a correlation is simply a matter of "following the paper trail," we approach this investigation with a decidedly earnest and statistical lens.

The year 2020 witnessed a surge of interest in the availability of toilet paper, with unprecedented fervor driving individuals to scour the web for sources of this essential item. Concurrently, the field of private investigation in Delaware has experienced its own fluctuations, impelling us to inquire whether these two fluctuations were mere coincidence or unwittily entwined in an intricate dance of correlation.

Thus, armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics on the number of private detectives in Delaware and Google search trends regarding the procurement of toilet paper, our study encompasses the years 2004 through 2022. By employing a rigorous statistical analysis, we endeavor to bring clarity to this captivating yet unexpected relationship.

As we embark on this analytical odyssey, we seek to elucidate the underlying factors driving the observed correlation with the seriousness it demands while also keeping a keen eye for the unexpected humor and amusement that awaits in the annals of statistical investigation. Our findings aim to not only add a touch of amusement to the academic discourse but also provide valuable insights into the way societal behavior intertwines with market dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Delaware and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Surveillance of Sudden Spikes: A Statistical Examination of the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Delaware and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Toilet Paper'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the number of private detectives in Delaware and the volume of Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough statistical analysis covering the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.7742851, coupled with a robust statistical significance (p < 0.01). Our research sheds light on the unexpected link between the surveillance industry and household consumables, offering an amusing yet thought-provoking insight into societal behavior and market trends.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The seemingly disparate realms of private investigation and consumer purchasing patterns have collided in a peculiar intersection, prompting an inquiry into the relationship between these two seemingly unrelated spheres. In this study, we aim to unravel the enigmatic connection between the number of private detectives in the state of Delaware and the frequency of Google searches for the elusive commodity of toilet paper. While some may jest that such a correlation is simply a matter of "following the paper trail," we approach this investigation with a decidedly earnest and statistical lens.
The year 2020 witnessed a surge of interest in the availability of toilet paper, with unprecedented fervor driving individuals to scour the web for sources of this essential item. Concurrently, the field of private investigation in Delaware has experienced its own fluctuations, impelling us to inquire whether these two fluctuations were mere coincidence or unwittily entwined in an intricate dance of correlation.
Thus, armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics on the number of private detectives in Delaware and Google search trends regarding the procurement of toilet paper, our study encompasses the years 2004 through 2022. By employing a rigorous statistical analysis, we endeavor to bring clarity to this captivating yet unexpected relationship.
As we embark on this analytical odyssey, we seek to elucidate the underlying factors driving the observed correlation with the seriousness it demands while also keeping a keen eye for the unexpected humor and amusement that awaits in the annals of statistical investigation. Our findings aim to not only add a touch of amusement to the academic discourse but also provide valuable insights into the way societal behavior intertwines with market dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

A compelling body of research has delved into the realm of consumer behavior, market trends, and surveillance practices, offering insights into the intricate facets of human interaction with goods and services. Smith (2010) demonstrates the impact of consumer sentiment on purchasing decisions, shedding light on the nuanced interplay between public perception and market dynamics. In a similar vein, Doe (2015) uncovers the influence of societal trends on the supply and demand of household products, providing a comprehensive analysis of consumption patterns.

Jones (2018) further contributes to the field by exploring the evolution of surveillance methods and their implications on consumer behavior. Drawing from these serious investigations, our study embarks on an unconventional path to uncover the tantalizing correlation between the abundance of private detectives in Delaware and the fervent quest for toilet paper.

Turning our attention to non-fiction literature related to our topic, "The Consumer Chronicles: A History of Household Goods" by John Smith presents a comprehensive overview of the societal factors shaping purchasing behaviors. In a similar vein, "Market Mayhem: The Secret Lives of Consumer Products" by Jane Doe offers a captivating exploration of the intricacies of market trends and consumer preferences.

Venturing into the realm of fiction that may tangentially relate to our subject matter, "The Secret Agent" by Joseph Conrad delves into the clandestine world of espionage, hinting at the covert dealings that may influence consumer behavior. Additionally, "The Big Short" by Michael Lewis provides a gripping narrative of the financial industry, serving as a reminder of the unpredictable nature of market forces.

Moreover, in our pursuit of unexpected connections, it would be remiss not to acknowledge the influence of popular culture on our understanding of surveillance and consumerism. Cartoons such as "Inspector Gadget" and "Scooby-Doo" offer whimsical portrayals of detective work, serving as a lighthearted reminder of the pervasive nature of surveillance in everyday life. Furthermore, children's shows such as "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" playfully engage with the concept of clandestine activities, inspiring curiosity about the undercurrents of information gathering and investigation.

Though these works may seem remote from our statistical inquiry, they serve as a whimsical backdrop to our earnest exploration of the connection between private detectives in Delaware and the quest for toilet paper. As we embark on this investigative odyssey, we aim to inject a touch of levity into the astute analysis of societal phenomena, recognizing that even the most unconventional correlations warrant a moment of mirthful consideration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Delaware and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Surveillance of Sudden Spikes: A Statistical Examination of the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Delaware and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Toilet Paper'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the number of private detectives in Delaware and the volume of Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough statistical analysis covering the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.7742851, coupled with a robust statistical significance (p < 0.01). Our research sheds light on the unexpected link between the surveillance industry and household consumables, offering an amusing yet thought-provoking insight into societal behavior and market trends.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The seemingly disparate realms of private investigation and consumer purchasing patterns have collided in a peculiar intersection, prompting an inquiry into the relationship between these two seemingly unrelated spheres. In this study, we aim to unravel the enigmatic connection between the number of private detectives in the state of Delaware and the frequency of Google searches for the elusive commodity of toilet paper. While some may jest that such a correlation is simply a matter of "following the paper trail," we approach this investigation with a decidedly earnest and statistical lens.
The year 2020 witnessed a surge of interest in the availability of toilet paper, with unprecedented fervor driving individuals to scour the web for sources of this essential item. Concurrently, the field of private investigation in Delaware has experienced its own fluctuations, impelling us to inquire whether these two fluctuations were mere coincidence or unwittily entwined in an intricate dance of correlation.
Thus, armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics on the number of private detectives in Delaware and Google search trends regarding the procurement of toilet paper, our study encompasses the years 2004 through 2022. By employing a rigorous statistical analysis, we endeavor to bring clarity to this captivating yet unexpected relationship.
As we embark on this analytical odyssey, we seek to elucidate the underlying factors driving the observed correlation with the seriousness it demands while also keeping a keen eye for the unexpected humor and amusement that awaits in the annals of statistical investigation. Our findings aim to not only add a touch of amusement to the academic discourse but also provide valuable insights into the way societal behavior intertwines with market dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this research endeavors to unveil the underlying mechanisms driving the observed correlation between the number of private detectives in Delaware and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Our data collection sources primarily included the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, as these platforms offered the most comprehensive and reliable datasets for the period spanning 2004 to 2022.

To initiate the investigation, we sought to establish a sound foundation for our statistical analysis. With the tenacity of a seasoned detective unraveling a complex case, we meticulously compiled the yearly counts of private detectives in Delaware, combing through the Bureau of Labor Statistics database for the requisite data. Meanwhile, our quest for insights into the toilet paper procurement behavior of the populace led us to Google Trends, where we unearthed the search volume index for the specific query 'where to buy toilet paper' over the same time frame.

In a departure from conventional methodologies, we integrated a novel approach to further enrich our dataset. Embracing the spirit of uncovering hidden truths, we employed a reconciliatory algorithm to merge the Bureau of Labor Statistics data with the Google Trends search index. This entailed transforming the numerical representations of both datasets into a comparable format, creating an unprecedented union of labor market statistics and toilet paper-centric cyber inquiries.

Embarking on the analysis phase, we applied a diverse array of statistical techniques, each chosen with the precision of a detective selecting the right tool for the job. From humble yet dependable correlation measures to sophisticated time series analyses, our methodological arsenal was designed to leave no stone unturned in our quest for understanding this intriguing relationship. We proceeded to calculate correlation coefficients, perform linear regression analysis, and explore any temporal patterns or anomalies with resolute determination.

The statistical analyses were conducted using industry-standard software and coding languages, meticulously cross-referenced with manual scrutiny to affirm the coherence and accuracy of our findings.

Our methodological approach, while infused with the essence of lighthearted curiosity, remained anchored in the foundational principles of rigorous statistical inquiry. By championing a blend of seriousness and subtle amusement, we unveiled the surprising correlation between the surveillance sector and the perennial quest for toilet paper. The ensuing section presents the findings of our investigation, shedding light on this unexpected pairing with the diligence expected of a seasoned investigator.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Delaware and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7742851, r-squared of 0.5995173, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Surveillance of Sudden Spikes: A Statistical Examination of the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Delaware and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Toilet Paper'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the number of private detectives in Delaware and the volume of Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough statistical analysis covering the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.7742851, coupled with a robust statistical significance (p < 0.01). Our research sheds light on the unexpected link between the surveillance industry and household consumables, offering an amusing yet thought-provoking insight into societal behavior and market trends.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The seemingly disparate realms of private investigation and consumer purchasing patterns have collided in a peculiar intersection, prompting an inquiry into the relationship between these two seemingly unrelated spheres. In this study, we aim to unravel the enigmatic connection between the number of private detectives in the state of Delaware and the frequency of Google searches for the elusive commodity of toilet paper. While some may jest that such a correlation is simply a matter of "following the paper trail," we approach this investigation with a decidedly earnest and statistical lens.
The year 2020 witnessed a surge of interest in the availability of toilet paper, with unprecedented fervor driving individuals to scour the web for sources of this essential item. Concurrently, the field of private investigation in Delaware has experienced its own fluctuations, impelling us to inquire whether these two fluctuations were mere coincidence or unwittily entwined in an intricate dance of correlation.
Thus, armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics on the number of private detectives in Delaware and Google search trends regarding the procurement of toilet paper, our study encompasses the years 2004 through 2022. By employing a rigorous statistical analysis, we endeavor to bring clarity to this captivating yet unexpected relationship.
As we embark on this analytical odyssey, we seek to elucidate the underlying factors driving the observed correlation with the seriousness it demands while also keeping a keen eye for the unexpected humor and amusement that awaits in the annals of statistical investigation. Our findings aim to not only add a touch of amusement to the academic discourse but also provide valuable insights into the way societal behavior intertwines with market dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The serendipitous convergence of detective work and consumer pursuits has yielded intriguing findings. Through our rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a substantial correlation between the number of private detectives in Delaware and the volume of Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. The correlation coefficient of 0.7742851 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, capturing the attention of statisticians and humorists alike.

A r-squared value of 0.5995173 reveals that approximately 60% of the variation in Google searches for toilet paper can be explained by the variation in the number of private detectives in Delaware. This finding elucidates the degree to which the demand for this essential household item may intersect with the activities of the surveillance industry in a manner that defies conventional intuition - a statistical enigma, if you will.

Furthermore, the statistical significance of our findings, denoted by p < 0.01, firmly establishes the robustness of the observed relationship. This result provides assurance that the correlation is not purely a product of chance, but reflects a genuine connection that warrants further investigation and potentially, a chuckle or two.

For a visual depiction of the correlation, refer to Figure 1, a scatterplot that conveys the striking association between the number of private detectives in Delaware and the frequency of Google searches for toilet paper. The data points coalesce along a trend line that accentuates the robustness of the observed relationship, reaffirming the profound insight that statistical analysis can offer in uncovering lighthearted yet enlightening connections in the world around us.

Our findings not only expand the frontiers of statistical inquiry but also infuse a touch of whimsy into the academic discourse, serving as a lighthearted reminder of the unexpected correlations that await discovery when statistical analysis meets societal behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Delaware and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Surveillance of Sudden Spikes: A Statistical Examination of the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Delaware and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Toilet Paper'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the number of private detectives in Delaware and the volume of Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough statistical analysis covering the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.7742851, coupled with a robust statistical significance (p < 0.01). Our research sheds light on the unexpected link between the surveillance industry and household consumables, offering an amusing yet thought-provoking insight into societal behavior and market trends.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
A compelling body of research has delved into the realm of consumer behavior, market trends, and surveillance practices, offering insights into the intricate facets of human interaction with goods and services. Smith (2010) demonstrates the impact of consumer sentiment on purchasing decisions, shedding light on the nuanced interplay between public perception and market dynamics. In a similar vein, Doe (2015) uncovers the influence of societal trends on the supply and demand of household products, providing a comprehensive analysis of consumption patterns.
Jones (2018) further contributes to the field by exploring the evolution of surveillance methods and their implications on consumer behavior. Drawing from these serious investigations, our study embarks on an unconventional path to uncover the tantalizing correlation between the abundance of private detectives in Delaware and the fervent quest for toilet paper.
Turning our attention to non-fiction literature related to our topic, "The Consumer Chronicles: A History of Household Goods" by John Smith presents a comprehensive overview of the societal factors shaping purchasing behaviors. In a similar vein, "Market Mayhem: The Secret Lives of Consumer Products" by Jane Doe offers a captivating exploration of the intricacies of market trends and consumer preferences.
Venturing into the realm of fiction that may tangentially relate to our subject matter, "The Secret Agent" by Joseph Conrad delves into the clandestine world of espionage, hinting at the covert dealings that may influence consumer behavior. Additionally, "The Big Short" by Michael Lewis provides a gripping narrative of the financial industry, serving as a reminder of the unpredictable nature of market forces.
Moreover, in our pursuit of unexpected connections, it would be remiss not to acknowledge the influence of popular culture on our understanding of surveillance and consumerism. Cartoons such as "Inspector Gadget" and "Scooby-Doo" offer whimsical portrayals of detective work, serving as a lighthearted reminder of the pervasive nature of surveillance in everyday life. Furthermore, children's shows such as "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" playfully engage with the concept of clandestine activities, inspiring curiosity about the undercurrents of information gathering and investigation.
Though these works may seem remote from our statistical inquiry, they serve as a whimsical backdrop to our earnest exploration of the connection between private detectives in Delaware and the quest for toilet paper. As we embark on this investigative odyssey, we aim to inject a touch of levity into the astute analysis of societal phenomena, recognizing that even the most unconventional correlations warrant a moment of mirthful consideration.

[[RESULTS]]
The serendipitous convergence of detective work and consumer pursuits has yielded intriguing findings. Through our rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a substantial correlation between the number of private detectives in Delaware and the volume of Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. The correlation coefficient of 0.7742851 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, capturing the attention of statisticians and humorists alike.
A r-squared value of 0.5995173 reveals that approximately 60% of the variation in Google searches for toilet paper can be explained by the variation in the number of private detectives in Delaware. This finding elucidates the degree to which the demand for this essential household item may intersect with the activities of the surveillance industry in a manner that defies conventional intuition - a statistical enigma, if you will.
Furthermore, the statistical significance of our findings, denoted by p < 0.01, firmly establishes the robustness of the observed relationship. This result provides assurance that the correlation is not purely a product of chance, but reflects a genuine connection that warrants further investigation and potentially, a chuckle or two.
For a visual depiction of the correlation, refer to Figure 1, a scatterplot that conveys the striking association between the number of private detectives in Delaware and the frequency of Google searches for toilet paper. The data points coalesce along a trend line that accentuates the robustness of the observed relationship, reaffirming the profound insight that statistical analysis can offer in uncovering lighthearted yet enlightening connections in the world around us.
Our findings not only expand the frontiers of statistical inquiry but also infuse a touch of whimsy into the academic discourse, serving as a lighthearted reminder of the unexpected correlations that await discovery when statistical analysis meets societal behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have given rise to a fascinating conundrum: the statistical link between the number of private detectives in Delaware and the surge in Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. While this correlation may, at first glance, appear comical or absurd, our findings suggest a serious underpinning to this unexpected relationship.

Our investigation builds upon the existing literature that explores the intricate web of consumer behavior and market trends. Smith's (2010) elucidation of consumer sentiment, Doe's (2015) analysis of societal trends, and Jones's (2018) investigation into surveillance methods have all contributed to our understanding of the complex dynamics at play. With a nod to these serious studies, we have ventured into uncharted territory, probing the whimsical connection between private detectives and toilet paper - a correlation that has now been solidified by our robust empirical evidence.

The correlation coefficient of 0.7742851 and the impressively low p-value affirm the strength and significance of the relationship observed. This statistical support lends credence to the notion that there is indeed a tangible association between the clandestine activities of private detectives and the public's fervent pursuit of household essentials. The r-squared value of 0.5995173 further emphasizes the degree to which the variation in toilet paper searches is explained by the variation in private detective numbers, highlighting the surprising interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena.

It is important to remember that correlation does not imply causation. It is unlikely that the mere presence of private detectives in Delaware directly influences the urgency of acquiring toilet paper. Instead, our findings may reflect broader societal trends and the ways in which consumer behavior and market demand intersect with seemingly unrelated industries. However, our results undeniably provide a lighthearted lens through which to view these intricate relationships, sparking a chuckle or two at the whimsical nature of statistical discovery.

In addition to the serious literature that has informed our inquiry, we must also acknowledge the playful backdrop against which our study unfolds. References to "Inspector Gadget", "Scooby-Doo", and "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" may seem whimsical in the context of statistical inquiry, but they serve as a charming reminder that even the most unconventional correlations warrant thoughtful examination - and perhaps a moment of mirthful contemplation.

Ultimately, our study not only adds a quirky touch to the scholarly discourse but also underscores the latent humor that can be found in unexpected statistical relationships. As we consider the intersection of private detection and toilet paper quests, we are reminded that statistical analysis, while often serious and systematic, can also offer a delightful glimpse into the amusing intricacies of human behavior and industry influence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Delaware and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Surveillance of Sudden Spikes: A Statistical Examination of the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Delaware and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Toilet Paper'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the number of private detectives in Delaware and the volume of Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough statistical analysis covering the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.7742851, coupled with a robust statistical significance (p < 0.01). Our research sheds light on the unexpected link between the surveillance industry and household consumables, offering an amusing yet thought-provoking insight into societal behavior and market trends.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The seemingly disparate realms of private investigation and consumer purchasing patterns have collided in a peculiar intersection, prompting an inquiry into the relationship between these two seemingly unrelated spheres. In this study, we aim to unravel the enigmatic connection between the number of private detectives in the state of Delaware and the frequency of Google searches for the elusive commodity of toilet paper. While some may jest that such a correlation is simply a matter of "following the paper trail," we approach this investigation with a decidedly earnest and statistical lens.
The year 2020 witnessed a surge of interest in the availability of toilet paper, with unprecedented fervor driving individuals to scour the web for sources of this essential item. Concurrently, the field of private investigation in Delaware has experienced its own fluctuations, impelling us to inquire whether these two fluctuations were mere coincidence or unwittily entwined in an intricate dance of correlation.
Thus, armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics on the number of private detectives in Delaware and Google search trends regarding the procurement of toilet paper, our study encompasses the years 2004 through 2022. By employing a rigorous statistical analysis, we endeavor to bring clarity to this captivating yet unexpected relationship.
As we embark on this analytical odyssey, we seek to elucidate the underlying factors driving the observed correlation with the seriousness it demands while also keeping a keen eye for the unexpected humor and amusement that awaits in the annals of statistical investigation. Our findings aim to not only add a touch of amusement to the academic discourse but also provide valuable insights into the way societal behavior intertwines with market dynamics.

[[RESULTS]]
The serendipitous convergence of detective work and consumer pursuits has yielded intriguing findings. Through our rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a substantial correlation between the number of private detectives in Delaware and the volume of Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. The correlation coefficient of 0.7742851 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, capturing the attention of statisticians and humorists alike.
A r-squared value of 0.5995173 reveals that approximately 60% of the variation in Google searches for toilet paper can be explained by the variation in the number of private detectives in Delaware. This finding elucidates the degree to which the demand for this essential household item may intersect with the activities of the surveillance industry in a manner that defies conventional intuition - a statistical enigma, if you will.
Furthermore, the statistical significance of our findings, denoted by p < 0.01, firmly establishes the robustness of the observed relationship. This result provides assurance that the correlation is not purely a product of chance, but reflects a genuine connection that warrants further investigation and potentially, a chuckle or two.
For a visual depiction of the correlation, refer to Figure 1, a scatterplot that conveys the striking association between the number of private detectives in Delaware and the frequency of Google searches for toilet paper. The data points coalesce along a trend line that accentuates the robustness of the observed relationship, reaffirming the profound insight that statistical analysis can offer in uncovering lighthearted yet enlightening connections in the world around us.
Our findings not only expand the frontiers of statistical inquiry but also infuse a touch of whimsy into the academic discourse, serving as a lighthearted reminder of the unexpected correlations that await discovery when statistical analysis meets societal behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has brought to light the captivating relationship between the number of private detectives in Delaware and the public's fervent quest for toilet paper. The remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.7742851, backed by a robust statistical significance (p < 0.01), provides compelling evidence of the intertwining fates of the surveillance industry and household consumables. Our findings not only offer an intriguing insight into societal behavior and market trends but also underscore the charming unpredictability of statistical inquiry.

The strong positive relationship we uncovered, amounting to approximately 60% of the variation in Google searches for toilet paper being explainable by the variation in the number of private detectives in Delaware, serves as a testament to the inextricable link between seemingly unrelated domains. While some may find the evident correlation as banal as "unraveling a tissue of lies," our statistical analysis emphasizes that this phenomenon is no mere statistical sleight of hand, but a genuine connection that warrants further attention and, dare I say, a muted snicker.

As we heed the call for academic earnestness, we cannot overlook the inherent humor and whimsy intertwined in our findings – a statistical dance between surveillance operations and the whims of the consumer paper trail. The visual depiction of our correlation, embodied in Figure 1, stands as an artistic portrayal of the unexpected connections waiting to be uncovered through the lens of statistical analysis. It is a reminder that even the most unassuming variables can engage in a graceful statistical waltz, eliciting both awe and amusement from the discerning observer.

In light of our comprehensive analysis, it is our firm assertion that no further research is needed in this area. We have unraveled the statistical yarn that binds private detectives and toilet paper searches, leaving little room for doubt or further inquiry. With that, we bid adieu to this eccentric yet enlightening statistical oddity, allowing it to stand as a spirited testament to the delightful surprises that statistical investigation can offer.

No more research is needed here – this particular paper trail has been diligently surveilled, and the conclusion is as firm as a well-stocked toilet paper dispenser.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Surveillance of Sudden Spikes: A Statistical Examination of the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Delaware and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Toilet Paper'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Investigations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Surveillance of Sudden Spikes: A Statistical Examination of the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Delaware and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Toilet Paper'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for the Advancement of Quirky Research Endeavors (SAQRE)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Surveillance of Sudden Spikes: A Statistical Examination of the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Delaware and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Toilet Paper' with an abstract of In this research, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the number of private detectives in Delaware and the volume of Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough statistical analysis covering the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.7742851, coupled with a robust statistical significance (p < 0.01). Our research sheds light on the unexpected link between the surveillance industry and household consumables, offering an amusing yet thought-provoking insight into societal behavior and market trends.

ChatGPT:

Private detectives Delaware, Google searches toilet paper, correlation household consumables surveillance, statistical analysis market trends, Bureau of Labor Statistics Delaware, Google Trends data analysis, surveillance industry societal behavior, private investigators toilet paper purchase patterns

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of private detectives in Delaware
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of private detectives and investigators in Delaware
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of private detectives in Delaware

Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'

Correlation r = 0.7742851 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5995173 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 60% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of private detectives in Delaware) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0001. 0.0000998095003872454100000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.77 in 0.01% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 10,019 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.49, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of private detectives in Delaware (Laborers)70503030404030303040609010070402603204040
Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper' (Rel. search volume)0.3333330.5833330.3333330.083333300.3333330.50.2510.83333311111112.583311




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([70,50,30,30,40,40,30,30,30,40,60,90,100,70,40,260,320,40,40,])
array_2 = np.array([0.333333,0.583333,0.333333,0.0833333,0,0.333333,0.5,0.25,1,0.833333,1,1,1,1,1,1,12.5833,1,1,])
array_1_name = "The number of private detectives in Delaware"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 3178 · Black Variable ID: 6177 · Red Variable ID: 1385
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0