about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,085 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota and the second variable is Total regular season games played by Nicklas Backstrom.  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The genetically modified soybeans inadvertently produced a bumper crop of hockey stick-shaped plants, leading to a surge in the availability of high-quality, locally sourced equipment. With an abundance of top-notch sticks at his disposal, Nicklas Backstrom was inspired to spend more time practicing and ultimately ended up playing more regular season games. It’s a classic case of agricultural innovation indirectly fueling hockey success!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a stunning Discovery magazine cover featuring a picturesque scene: a farmer standing triumphantly in a field of lush, genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota. In the background, a powerful image of Nicklas Backstrom tirelessly gliding on the ice, supported by the nourishing benefits of the soybeans that have propelled him to play a record number of regular season games with unwavering endurance. The image should capture the vibrant colors of the soybean field and the determination in the hockey player's movements, evoking a sense of resilience and vitality. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota and Total regular season games played by Nicklas Backstrom. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: inspired by bauhaus Concept art An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie a Polaroid photo A Discovery magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota and Total regular season games played by Nicklas Backstrom, in the following situation: Because GMO soybeans in North Dakota increased, Nicklas Backstrom played more games due to the enhanced nutritional value of soy, resulting in higher endurance and on-ice performance.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In North Dakota, a farmer stands proudly in a field of vibrant GMO soybeans. In the background, Nicklas Backstrom skates tirelessly on the ice, playing a record number of regular season games with unwavering endurance, thanks to the nourishing benefits of the soybeans.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In North Dakota, a farmer stands proudly in a field of vibrant GMO soybeans. In the background, Nicklas Backstrom skates tirelessly on the ice, playing a record number of regular season games with unwavering endurance, thanks to the nourishing benefits of the soybeans. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a stunning Discovery magazine cover featuring a picturesque scene: a farmer standing triumphantly in a field of lush, genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota. In the background, a powerful image of Nicklas Backstrom tirelessly gliding on the ice, supported by the nourishing benefits of the soybeans that have propelled him to play a record number of regular season games with unwavering endurance. The image should capture the vibrant colors of the soybean field and the determination in the hockey player's movements, evoking a sense of resilience and vitality.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota caused Total regular season games played by Nicklas Backstrom to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Soybean Score: Exploring the Interplay Between GMO Use in North Dakota and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL Stint

The Journal of Agro-Hockey Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota and Total regular season games played by Nicklas Backstrom. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from USDA and NHL to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8088943 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Soybean Score: Exploring the Interplay Between GMO Use in North Dakota and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL Stint

[[ABSTRACT]]
GMO soybeans have long been a topic of debate and discussion, much like the career of NHL star Nicklas Backstrom. In this paper, we delve into the whimsical world of statistical analysis to explore the intriguing correlation between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and the total regular season games played by the enigmatic Nicklas Backstrom. Embracing our inner Sherlock Holmes, we investigated data from the USDA and the NHL to conduct a thorough examination of this peculiar relationship.

As we crunched the numbers, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8088943 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. Our findings provide compelling evidence that there might be more to GMO soybeans and Backstrom's on-ice prowess than meets the eye. This paper aims to spark intriguing conversations about the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena and inject some lighthearted humor into the often staid world of academic research. So, buckle up as we embark on a lighthearted, yet insightful journey into the world of GMO soybeans and NHL statistics!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota and Total regular season games played by Nicklas Backstrom. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Soybean Score: Exploring the Interplay Between GMO Use in North Dakota and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL Stint

[[ABSTRACT]]
GMO soybeans have long been a topic of debate and discussion, much like the career of NHL star Nicklas Backstrom. In this paper, we delve into the whimsical world of statistical analysis to explore the intriguing correlation between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and the total regular season games played by the enigmatic Nicklas Backstrom. Embracing our inner Sherlock Holmes, we investigated data from the USDA and the NHL to conduct a thorough examination of this peculiar relationship.

As we crunched the numbers, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8088943 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. Our findings provide compelling evidence that there might be more to GMO soybeans and Backstrom's on-ice prowess than meets the eye. This paper aims to spark intriguing conversations about the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena and inject some lighthearted humor into the often staid world of academic research. So, buckle up as we embark on a lighthearted, yet insightful journey into the world of GMO soybeans and NHL statistics!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

When considering the realm of agricultural biotechnology and professional ice hockey, one might be forgiven for assuming there could be no conceivable link between the two. However, with the rise of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the soybean fields of North Dakota and the enduring presence of Nicklas Backstrom in the NHL, we are confronted with a peculiar union that demands our attention. Much like the unyielding force of gravity or the persistence of unanswered voicemails from your mother-in-law, this unlikely pairing beckons us to uncover its underlying mysteries and absurdities.

In this paper, we aim to unravel the tangled web connecting the adoption of GMO soybeans in North Dakota and the total regular season games played by the enigmatic Nicklas Backstrom. By embracing the whimsy of statistical analysis, we venture into uncharted territory with the determination of a penguin navigating the treacherous perils of a newly zambonied ice rink.

GMO soybeans, with their genetically tailored traits and potential economic impact, have garnered significant attention among agricultural enthusiasts and skeptics alike, akin to the frenzy surrounding a new mysterious flavor of ice cream or a polarizing fashion trend. Concurrently, the career of Nicklas Backstrom, with its highs, lows, and epic playoff beard moments, has captured the imaginations of hockey fans and analysts worldwide, much like a captivating soap opera or a particularly thrilling game of Monopoly.

As we embark on this escapade of scientific whimsy, we invite you to don your metaphorical lab coat and join us in the exploration of this captivating nexus between soybeans and slap shots. Our investigation promises to be as unpredictable as a game of musical chairs at a genetics symposium, but let us assure you, the discoveries that await are as tantalizing as a freshly baked batch of statistical cookies.

So, without further ado, let us dive headfirst into the cornucopia of peculiarities that lie at the intersection of GMO soybeans and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL career. It's a journey that promises to be as quirky as a round of statistical karaoke but as enlightening as a eureka moment in a dimly lit laboratory. With that said, fasten your seatbelts, grab your calculators, and prepare for an exhilarating romp through the enchanting realm of statistical absurdity!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota and Total regular season games played by Nicklas Backstrom. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Soybean Score: Exploring the Interplay Between GMO Use in North Dakota and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL Stint

[[ABSTRACT]]
GMO soybeans have long been a topic of debate and discussion, much like the career of NHL star Nicklas Backstrom. In this paper, we delve into the whimsical world of statistical analysis to explore the intriguing correlation between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and the total regular season games played by the enigmatic Nicklas Backstrom. Embracing our inner Sherlock Holmes, we investigated data from the USDA and the NHL to conduct a thorough examination of this peculiar relationship.

As we crunched the numbers, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8088943 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. Our findings provide compelling evidence that there might be more to GMO soybeans and Backstrom's on-ice prowess than meets the eye. This paper aims to spark intriguing conversations about the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena and inject some lighthearted humor into the often staid world of academic research. So, buckle up as we embark on a lighthearted, yet insightful journey into the world of GMO soybeans and NHL statistics!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
When considering the realm of agricultural biotechnology and professional ice hockey, one might be forgiven for assuming there could be no conceivable link between the two. However, with the rise of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the soybean fields of North Dakota and the enduring presence of Nicklas Backstrom in the NHL, we are confronted with a peculiar union that demands our attention. Much like the unyielding force of gravity or the persistence of unanswered voicemails from your mother-in-law, this unlikely pairing beckons us to uncover its underlying mysteries and absurdities.
In this paper, we aim to unravel the tangled web connecting the adoption of GMO soybeans in North Dakota and the total regular season games played by the enigmatic Nicklas Backstrom. By embracing the whimsy of statistical analysis, we venture into uncharted territory with the determination of a penguin navigating the treacherous perils of a newly zambonied ice rink.
GMO soybeans, with their genetically tailored traits and potential economic impact, have garnered significant attention among agricultural enthusiasts and skeptics alike, akin to the frenzy surrounding a new mysterious flavor of ice cream or a polarizing fashion trend. Concurrently, the career of Nicklas Backstrom, with its highs, lows, and epic playoff beard moments, has captured the imaginations of hockey fans and analysts worldwide, much like a captivating soap opera or a particularly thrilling game of Monopoly.
As we embark on this escapade of scientific whimsy, we invite you to don your metaphorical lab coat and join us in the exploration of this captivating nexus between soybeans and slap shots. Our investigation promises to be as unpredictable as a game of musical chairs at a genetics symposium, but let us assure you, the discoveries that await are as tantalizing as a freshly baked batch of statistical cookies.
So, without further ado, let us dive headfirst into the cornucopia of peculiarities that lie at the intersection of GMO soybeans and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL career. It's a journey that promises to be as quirky as a round of statistical karaoke but as enlightening as a eureka moment in a dimly lit laboratory. With that said, fasten your seatbelts, grab your calculators, and prepare for an exhilarating romp through the enchanting realm of statistical absurdity!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans (GMOs) in North Dakota and the total number of regular season games played by NHL star Nicklas Backstrom has captivated the scholarly community, much like the intrigue surrounding a Sherlock Holmes mystery adaptation set in the vast soybean fields of the American Midwest. While seemingly disparate, these two entities have sparked a flurry of interest, reminiscent of the tumultuous reactions following the release of a surprise science fiction romance novel.

Smith et al. (2010) delved into the agricultural landscape of North Dakota, unearthing the economic ramifications of GMO soybean adoption and its potential impact on crop yield. Similarly, Doe (2015) scrutinized the ecological implications of genetically modified crops, drawing parallels to the resilience and adaptability of NHL players in the face of rigorous game schedules. These studies shed light on the multifaceted nature of both GMO adoption and professional sports careers, providing a solid foundation for our current investigation.

Turning our attention to the wider ecosystem of literature, Jones (2012) presented a comprehensive analysis of the genetic modification debate, including the contrasting viewpoints of proponents and detractors. In an unexpected twist, "Farming in the Fast Lane" by Green Thumb Gurus (2018) offered a tongue-in-cheek exposé of the quirky world of agricultural innovation, hinting at the possibility of secret genetic modifications enhancing athletic abilities, not just crop traits.

On the more fanciful side, "Soybeans: A Love Story" by Agri-Romance Quarterly (2017) spun a tale of star-crossed soybean farmers, but buried within its pages were kernels of wisdom about the interconnectedness of agricultural practices and unexpected consequences. In a lighthearted nod to fiction, "The Great Bean Caper" by Fictitious Farming Tales (2019) threw caution to the wind as it wove a fantastical narrative involving a mischievous genie granting extraordinary abilities to those toiling in the soybean fields. Despite its whimsical nature, the book raised thought-provoking questions about the potential impact of unanticipated genetic enhancements.

From a more visual perspective, the researchers also engaged with media representations of soybean cultivation and the NHL. "Field to Glory: A Soybean Saga" provided a cinematic view of midwestern farming, offering a glimpse into the toils and triumphs of those cultivating the humble soybean. On the ice, "Puck and Prejudice" showcased the tumultuous hockey career of a fictional character, evoking comparisons to the real-life trials and triumphs of Nicklas Backstrom. The captivating drama and comedic mishaps mirrored the unpredictability present in both the world of sports and genetic crop modification, providing a whimsical backdrop to our scholarly pursuits.

As an unconventional approach, the researchers also indulged in the consumption of media such as "Soybeans, Soy More!" – a reality television show offering insight into the soybean industry. Additionally, "Hockey Night Heuristics" provided an entertaining lens through which to view the world of professional hockey, igniting the researchers' passion for exploring the quirky connection between soybeans and slap shots.

In the next section, we delve into the statistical analyses that form the crux of our investigation, revealing unexpected patterns and correlations that could rival even the most perplexing plot twists of a mystery novel. So, buckle up for the rollercoaster ride of GMOs, hockey, and statistical shenanigans – it's bound to be as exhilarating as a game-winning overtime goal, and quite possibly as absurd as a competitive vegetable-growing contest in the middle of an ice rink!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota and Total regular season games played by Nicklas Backstrom. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and NHL . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Soybean Score: Exploring the Interplay Between GMO Use in North Dakota and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL Stint

[[ABSTRACT]]
GMO soybeans have long been a topic of debate and discussion, much like the career of NHL star Nicklas Backstrom. In this paper, we delve into the whimsical world of statistical analysis to explore the intriguing correlation between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and the total regular season games played by the enigmatic Nicklas Backstrom. Embracing our inner Sherlock Holmes, we investigated data from the USDA and the NHL to conduct a thorough examination of this peculiar relationship.

As we crunched the numbers, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8088943 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. Our findings provide compelling evidence that there might be more to GMO soybeans and Backstrom's on-ice prowess than meets the eye. This paper aims to spark intriguing conversations about the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena and inject some lighthearted humor into the often staid world of academic research. So, buckle up as we embark on a lighthearted, yet insightful journey into the world of GMO soybeans and NHL statistics!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
When considering the realm of agricultural biotechnology and professional ice hockey, one might be forgiven for assuming there could be no conceivable link between the two. However, with the rise of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the soybean fields of North Dakota and the enduring presence of Nicklas Backstrom in the NHL, we are confronted with a peculiar union that demands our attention. Much like the unyielding force of gravity or the persistence of unanswered voicemails from your mother-in-law, this unlikely pairing beckons us to uncover its underlying mysteries and absurdities.
In this paper, we aim to unravel the tangled web connecting the adoption of GMO soybeans in North Dakota and the total regular season games played by the enigmatic Nicklas Backstrom. By embracing the whimsy of statistical analysis, we venture into uncharted territory with the determination of a penguin navigating the treacherous perils of a newly zambonied ice rink.
GMO soybeans, with their genetically tailored traits and potential economic impact, have garnered significant attention among agricultural enthusiasts and skeptics alike, akin to the frenzy surrounding a new mysterious flavor of ice cream or a polarizing fashion trend. Concurrently, the career of Nicklas Backstrom, with its highs, lows, and epic playoff beard moments, has captured the imaginations of hockey fans and analysts worldwide, much like a captivating soap opera or a particularly thrilling game of Monopoly.
As we embark on this escapade of scientific whimsy, we invite you to don your metaphorical lab coat and join us in the exploration of this captivating nexus between soybeans and slap shots. Our investigation promises to be as unpredictable as a game of musical chairs at a genetics symposium, but let us assure you, the discoveries that await are as tantalizing as a freshly baked batch of statistical cookies.
So, without further ado, let us dive headfirst into the cornucopia of peculiarities that lie at the intersection of GMO soybeans and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL career. It's a journey that promises to be as quirky as a round of statistical karaoke but as enlightening as a eureka moment in a dimly lit laboratory. With that said, fasten your seatbelts, grab your calculators, and prepare for an exhilarating romp through the enchanting realm of statistical absurdity!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

It was imperative to devise a methodology as eclectic as the subjects under investigation – genetically modified soybeans and the esteemed NHL player, Nicklas Backstrom. Our team embarked on a quest to corral data from the wild frontiers of the internet, relying on sources as varied as the USDA and the NHL archives. We scoured these digital landscapes, navigating through the treacherous terrains of statistical databases and hockey fan forums alike.

To forge a path through this uncharted realm, we employed a mix of quantitative analysis tempered with a dash of whimsy – much like seeking the perfect ratio of cocoa and sugar when baking statistical brownies. Our trusty statistical software, fueled by the finest algorithms known to humankind, diligently churned through the vast array of data points, combining the rigor of peak efficiency with the audacity of unbridled curiosity.

The analysis encompassed a time span stretching from 2002 to 2022, a period rife with the growth of GMO soybeans and the flourishing of Backstrom's on-ice career. To investigate the connection between these seemingly disparate threads, we summoned the forces of correlation analysis, teasing apart the interplay between GMO adoption in North Dakota and the total number of regular season games attended by the puck-savvy virtuoso, Nicklas Backstrom.

Imbued with the enthusiasm of a labrador retriever chasing a frisbee, we embraced robust statistical methods, traversing through the terrain of regression analysis to unravel the potential nuances within the obtained datasets. This culminated in the unearthing of a correlation coefficient that exhibited a bond stronger than a corkscrew to a wine bottle, standing at a formidable 0.8088943. With a p-value that shimmered beneath the ever-elusive threshold of 0.01, the statistical constellations seemed to align in a manner as beguiling as the Fibonacci sequence in sunflower seed arrangements.

With data in hand, we conducted further analysis to unearth the underlying dynamics of this enigmatic relationship. It was a journey akin to untying a Gordian knot made of spaghetti – perplexing, yet strangely satisfying. The results of our quest not only provided compelling evidence of an unanticipated correlation, but also beckoned forth captivating conversations and, of course, the occasional office debate, akin to discussions about which statistical test holds the most coffee-induced clarity.

Having navigated the uncharted waters of GMO soybeans and the twists and turns of an NHL career, we emerged from this academic odyssey armed with empirical evidence and a newfound fondness for statistical puns. So, with the gravity of our findings weighing as heavily as a black hole in a physics classroom, we present the results of our unconventional foray into the interconnectedness of GMO soybeans and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL performance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota and Total regular season games played by Nicklas Backstrom. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and NHL .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8088943, r-squared of 0.6543100, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Soybean Score: Exploring the Interplay Between GMO Use in North Dakota and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL Stint

[[ABSTRACT]]
GMO soybeans have long been a topic of debate and discussion, much like the career of NHL star Nicklas Backstrom. In this paper, we delve into the whimsical world of statistical analysis to explore the intriguing correlation between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and the total regular season games played by the enigmatic Nicklas Backstrom. Embracing our inner Sherlock Holmes, we investigated data from the USDA and the NHL to conduct a thorough examination of this peculiar relationship.

As we crunched the numbers, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8088943 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. Our findings provide compelling evidence that there might be more to GMO soybeans and Backstrom's on-ice prowess than meets the eye. This paper aims to spark intriguing conversations about the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena and inject some lighthearted humor into the often staid world of academic research. So, buckle up as we embark on a lighthearted, yet insightful journey into the world of GMO soybeans and NHL statistics!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
When considering the realm of agricultural biotechnology and professional ice hockey, one might be forgiven for assuming there could be no conceivable link between the two. However, with the rise of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the soybean fields of North Dakota and the enduring presence of Nicklas Backstrom in the NHL, we are confronted with a peculiar union that demands our attention. Much like the unyielding force of gravity or the persistence of unanswered voicemails from your mother-in-law, this unlikely pairing beckons us to uncover its underlying mysteries and absurdities.
In this paper, we aim to unravel the tangled web connecting the adoption of GMO soybeans in North Dakota and the total regular season games played by the enigmatic Nicklas Backstrom. By embracing the whimsy of statistical analysis, we venture into uncharted territory with the determination of a penguin navigating the treacherous perils of a newly zambonied ice rink.
GMO soybeans, with their genetically tailored traits and potential economic impact, have garnered significant attention among agricultural enthusiasts and skeptics alike, akin to the frenzy surrounding a new mysterious flavor of ice cream or a polarizing fashion trend. Concurrently, the career of Nicklas Backstrom, with its highs, lows, and epic playoff beard moments, has captured the imaginations of hockey fans and analysts worldwide, much like a captivating soap opera or a particularly thrilling game of Monopoly.
As we embark on this escapade of scientific whimsy, we invite you to don your metaphorical lab coat and join us in the exploration of this captivating nexus between soybeans and slap shots. Our investigation promises to be as unpredictable as a game of musical chairs at a genetics symposium, but let us assure you, the discoveries that await are as tantalizing as a freshly baked batch of statistical cookies.
So, without further ado, let us dive headfirst into the cornucopia of peculiarities that lie at the intersection of GMO soybeans and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL career. It's a journey that promises to be as quirky as a round of statistical karaoke but as enlightening as a eureka moment in a dimly lit laboratory. With that said, fasten your seatbelts, grab your calculators, and prepare for an exhilarating romp through the enchanting realm of statistical absurdity!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In our pursuit of unraveling the whimsical connection between genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and the NHL career of Nicklas Backstrom, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8088943, an r-squared value of 0.6543100, and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. Our statistical escapade was akin to navigating a labyrinth with only the guidance of a statistical GPS and a hearty helping of pure conjecture.

Upon delving into the data, we stumbled upon a scatterplot (Fig. 1) so striking, it could make even the most ardent statistics aficionado do a double take. As we peered at the plot, it was abundantly clear that the rise and spread of GMO soybeans in North Dakota bore an uncanny resemblance to the trajectory of Nicklas Backstrom's NHL journey. It was as if the soybeans were orchestrating a clandestine tango with Backstrom's career, a dance as bewildering and exhilarating as statistical line dancing.

The correlation we uncovered nearly leaped off the screen, much like a surprise jump scare in a horror movie, only this time, it was a tango of statistical significance and agricultural intrigue. It seems that the genetically modified soybeans were not content to merely grow in the fields; they were also planting their genetically engineered tendrils in the statistical fabric of Nicklas Backstrom's games played.

We understand that this revelation might sound as perplexing as a heated debate about the color of an experimental lab coat, but the numbers don't lie. Well, at least not in this case. Our findings hint at a possible connection as mysterious and captivating as a thrilling subplot in a mystery novel.

In essence, our results provide a whimsical glimpse into the interconnectedness of the agricultural realm and professional hockey, a connection that might raise more eyebrows than a statistical magician pulling a rabbit out of a data hat. It is a testament to the serendipitous nature of statistical inquiry and the delightful surprises it can unveil, much like stumbling upon a hidden treasure chest amidst a sea of data points.

As we bid adieu to this portion of our exploration, we leave you with the tantalizing prospect that there might be more to GMO soybeans and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL career than meets the eye. It's a conundrum that sounds as perplexing as trying to balance a beaker on a unicycle, but we are undeniably excited to see where this research journey will lead.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota and Total regular season games played by Nicklas Backstrom. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Soybean Score: Exploring the Interplay Between GMO Use in North Dakota and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL Stint

[[ABSTRACT]]
GMO soybeans have long been a topic of debate and discussion, much like the career of NHL star Nicklas Backstrom. In this paper, we delve into the whimsical world of statistical analysis to explore the intriguing correlation between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and the total regular season games played by the enigmatic Nicklas Backstrom. Embracing our inner Sherlock Holmes, we investigated data from the USDA and the NHL to conduct a thorough examination of this peculiar relationship.

As we crunched the numbers, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8088943 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. Our findings provide compelling evidence that there might be more to GMO soybeans and Backstrom's on-ice prowess than meets the eye. This paper aims to spark intriguing conversations about the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena and inject some lighthearted humor into the often staid world of academic research. So, buckle up as we embark on a lighthearted, yet insightful journey into the world of GMO soybeans and NHL statistics!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans (GMOs) in North Dakota and the total number of regular season games played by NHL star Nicklas Backstrom has captivated the scholarly community, much like the intrigue surrounding a Sherlock Holmes mystery adaptation set in the vast soybean fields of the American Midwest. While seemingly disparate, these two entities have sparked a flurry of interest, reminiscent of the tumultuous reactions following the release of a surprise science fiction romance novel.
Smith et al. (2010) delved into the agricultural landscape of North Dakota, unearthing the economic ramifications of GMO soybean adoption and its potential impact on crop yield. Similarly, Doe (2015) scrutinized the ecological implications of genetically modified crops, drawing parallels to the resilience and adaptability of NHL players in the face of rigorous game schedules. These studies shed light on the multifaceted nature of both GMO adoption and professional sports careers, providing a solid foundation for our current investigation.
Turning our attention to the wider ecosystem of literature, Jones (2012) presented a comprehensive analysis of the genetic modification debate, including the contrasting viewpoints of proponents and detractors. In an unexpected twist, "Farming in the Fast Lane" by Green Thumb Gurus (2018) offered a tongue-in-cheek exposé of the quirky world of agricultural innovation, hinting at the possibility of secret genetic modifications enhancing athletic abilities, not just crop traits.
On the more fanciful side, "Soybeans: A Love Story" by Agri-Romance Quarterly (2017) spun a tale of star-crossed soybean farmers, but buried within its pages were kernels of wisdom about the interconnectedness of agricultural practices and unexpected consequences. In a lighthearted nod to fiction, "The Great Bean Caper" by Fictitious Farming Tales (2019) threw caution to the wind as it wove a fantastical narrative involving a mischievous genie granting extraordinary abilities to those toiling in the soybean fields. Despite its whimsical nature, the book raised thought-provoking questions about the potential impact of unanticipated genetic enhancements.
From a more visual perspective, the researchers also engaged with media representations of soybean cultivation and the NHL. "Field to Glory: A Soybean Saga" provided a cinematic view of midwestern farming, offering a glimpse into the toils and triumphs of those cultivating the humble soybean. On the ice, "Puck and Prejudice" showcased the tumultuous hockey career of a fictional character, evoking comparisons to the real-life trials and triumphs of Nicklas Backstrom. The captivating drama and comedic mishaps mirrored the unpredictability present in both the world of sports and genetic crop modification, providing a whimsical backdrop to our scholarly pursuits.
As an unconventional approach, the researchers also indulged in the consumption of media such as "Soybeans, Soy More!" – a reality television show offering insight into the soybean industry. Additionally, "Hockey Night Heuristics" provided an entertaining lens through which to view the world of professional hockey, igniting the researchers' passion for exploring the quirky connection between soybeans and slap shots.
In the next section, we delve into the statistical analyses that form the crux of our investigation, revealing unexpected patterns and correlations that could rival even the most perplexing plot twists of a mystery novel. So, buckle up for the rollercoaster ride of GMOs, hockey, and statistical shenanigans – it's bound to be as exhilarating as a game-winning overtime goal, and quite possibly as absurd as a competitive vegetable-growing contest in the middle of an ice rink!

[[RESULTS]]
In our pursuit of unraveling the whimsical connection between genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and the NHL career of Nicklas Backstrom, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8088943, an r-squared value of 0.6543100, and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. Our statistical escapade was akin to navigating a labyrinth with only the guidance of a statistical GPS and a hearty helping of pure conjecture.
Upon delving into the data, we stumbled upon a scatterplot (Fig. 1) so striking, it could make even the most ardent statistics aficionado do a double take. As we peered at the plot, it was abundantly clear that the rise and spread of GMO soybeans in North Dakota bore an uncanny resemblance to the trajectory of Nicklas Backstrom's NHL journey. It was as if the soybeans were orchestrating a clandestine tango with Backstrom's career, a dance as bewildering and exhilarating as statistical line dancing.
The correlation we uncovered nearly leaped off the screen, much like a surprise jump scare in a horror movie, only this time, it was a tango of statistical significance and agricultural intrigue. It seems that the genetically modified soybeans were not content to merely grow in the fields; they were also planting their genetically engineered tendrils in the statistical fabric of Nicklas Backstrom's games played.
We understand that this revelation might sound as perplexing as a heated debate about the color of an experimental lab coat, but the numbers don't lie. Well, at least not in this case. Our findings hint at a possible connection as mysterious and captivating as a thrilling subplot in a mystery novel.
In essence, our results provide a whimsical glimpse into the interconnectedness of the agricultural realm and professional hockey, a connection that might raise more eyebrows than a statistical magician pulling a rabbit out of a data hat. It is a testament to the serendipitous nature of statistical inquiry and the delightful surprises it can unveil, much like stumbling upon a hidden treasure chest amidst a sea of data points.
As we bid adieu to this portion of our exploration, we leave you with the tantalizing prospect that there might be more to GMO soybeans and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL career than meets the eye. It's a conundrum that sounds as perplexing as trying to balance a beaker on a unicycle, but we are undeniably excited to see where this research journey will lead.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

In the hallowed halls of statistical sleuthing, we have unraveled a correlation between the adoption of GMO soybeans in North Dakota and the regular season games played by Nicklas Backstrom that rivals the exhilaration of discovering an Easter egg in a blockbuster movie. Our findings have not only mirrored previous research but have also turbocharged the whimsical wagon of agricultural intrigue and professional hockey happenstance.

Returning to the academic riff on a Sherlock Holmes adaptation set in the soybean fields, our results supported the economic and ecological ramifications of GMO soybean adoption highlighted by Smith et al. (2010) and Doe (2015). It's as if the soybeans were whispering tales of resilience and adaptation, akin to a thrilling saga of agricultural prowess and ingenuity, much like the plot development in a gripping science fiction romance novel.

In line with previous studies, Jones (2012) and the tongue-in-cheek "Farming in the Fast Lane" by Green Thumb Gurus (2018), our findings add another layer to the genetic modification debate and the possibility of secret enhancements. We dare say it's as if the soybeans and Backstrom's on-ice prowess were engaged in a whimsical tango, not unlike the dance of statistical significance and agricultural intrigue.

Our statistical escapade navigates a labyrinth of data with the prowess of a statistical GPS, weaving a fascinating tale of interconnectedness as captivating as a competitive vegetable-growing contest in the middle of an ice rink. The correlation coefficient practically leapt off the screen, like a tango of statistical significance and agricultural marvels that could rival even the most perplexing plot twists of a mystery novel.

So, buckle up for this wild rollercoaster ride of GMOs, hockey, and statistical shenanigans – it's bound to be as exhilarating as a game-winning overtime goal and quite possibly as absurd as a competitive vegetable-growing contest in the middle of an ice rink.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota and Total regular season games played by Nicklas Backstrom. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Soybean Score: Exploring the Interplay Between GMO Use in North Dakota and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL Stint

[[ABSTRACT]]
GMO soybeans have long been a topic of debate and discussion, much like the career of NHL star Nicklas Backstrom. In this paper, we delve into the whimsical world of statistical analysis to explore the intriguing correlation between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and the total regular season games played by the enigmatic Nicklas Backstrom. Embracing our inner Sherlock Holmes, we investigated data from the USDA and the NHL to conduct a thorough examination of this peculiar relationship.

As we crunched the numbers, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8088943 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. Our findings provide compelling evidence that there might be more to GMO soybeans and Backstrom's on-ice prowess than meets the eye. This paper aims to spark intriguing conversations about the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena and inject some lighthearted humor into the often staid world of academic research. So, buckle up as we embark on a lighthearted, yet insightful journey into the world of GMO soybeans and NHL statistics!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
When considering the realm of agricultural biotechnology and professional ice hockey, one might be forgiven for assuming there could be no conceivable link between the two. However, with the rise of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the soybean fields of North Dakota and the enduring presence of Nicklas Backstrom in the NHL, we are confronted with a peculiar union that demands our attention. Much like the unyielding force of gravity or the persistence of unanswered voicemails from your mother-in-law, this unlikely pairing beckons us to uncover its underlying mysteries and absurdities.
In this paper, we aim to unravel the tangled web connecting the adoption of GMO soybeans in North Dakota and the total regular season games played by the enigmatic Nicklas Backstrom. By embracing the whimsy of statistical analysis, we venture into uncharted territory with the determination of a penguin navigating the treacherous perils of a newly zambonied ice rink.
GMO soybeans, with their genetically tailored traits and potential economic impact, have garnered significant attention among agricultural enthusiasts and skeptics alike, akin to the frenzy surrounding a new mysterious flavor of ice cream or a polarizing fashion trend. Concurrently, the career of Nicklas Backstrom, with its highs, lows, and epic playoff beard moments, has captured the imaginations of hockey fans and analysts worldwide, much like a captivating soap opera or a particularly thrilling game of Monopoly.
As we embark on this escapade of scientific whimsy, we invite you to don your metaphorical lab coat and join us in the exploration of this captivating nexus between soybeans and slap shots. Our investigation promises to be as unpredictable as a game of musical chairs at a genetics symposium, but let us assure you, the discoveries that await are as tantalizing as a freshly baked batch of statistical cookies.
So, without further ado, let us dive headfirst into the cornucopia of peculiarities that lie at the intersection of GMO soybeans and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL career. It's a journey that promises to be as quirky as a round of statistical karaoke but as enlightening as a eureka moment in a dimly lit laboratory. With that said, fasten your seatbelts, grab your calculators, and prepare for an exhilarating romp through the enchanting realm of statistical absurdity!

[[RESULTS]]
In our pursuit of unraveling the whimsical connection between genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and the NHL career of Nicklas Backstrom, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8088943, an r-squared value of 0.6543100, and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. Our statistical escapade was akin to navigating a labyrinth with only the guidance of a statistical GPS and a hearty helping of pure conjecture.
Upon delving into the data, we stumbled upon a scatterplot (Fig. 1) so striking, it could make even the most ardent statistics aficionado do a double take. As we peered at the plot, it was abundantly clear that the rise and spread of GMO soybeans in North Dakota bore an uncanny resemblance to the trajectory of Nicklas Backstrom's NHL journey. It was as if the soybeans were orchestrating a clandestine tango with Backstrom's career, a dance as bewildering and exhilarating as statistical line dancing.
The correlation we uncovered nearly leaped off the screen, much like a surprise jump scare in a horror movie, only this time, it was a tango of statistical significance and agricultural intrigue. It seems that the genetically modified soybeans were not content to merely grow in the fields; they were also planting their genetically engineered tendrils in the statistical fabric of Nicklas Backstrom's games played.
We understand that this revelation might sound as perplexing as a heated debate about the color of an experimental lab coat, but the numbers don't lie. Well, at least not in this case. Our findings hint at a possible connection as mysterious and captivating as a thrilling subplot in a mystery novel.
In essence, our results provide a whimsical glimpse into the interconnectedness of the agricultural realm and professional hockey, a connection that might raise more eyebrows than a statistical magician pulling a rabbit out of a data hat. It is a testament to the serendipitous nature of statistical inquiry and the delightful surprises it can unveil, much like stumbling upon a hidden treasure chest amidst a sea of data points.
As we bid adieu to this portion of our exploration, we leave you with the tantalizing prospect that there might be more to GMO soybeans and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL career than meets the eye. It's a conundrum that sounds as perplexing as trying to balance a beaker on a unicycle, but we are undeniably excited to see where this research journey will lead.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our foray into the peculiar interplay between GMO soybeans in North Dakota and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL stint has left us with more questions than answers, much like trying to comprehend the quirks of quantum mechanics after a double shot of espresso. Our findings unveil a correlation coefficient that is as eyebrow-raising as a magician pulling a statistical rabbit out of a data hat.

The statistically significant relationship we uncovered between GMO soybean adoption and the total regular season games played by Backstrom is as puzzling as a Rubik's Cube dipped in statistical significance. It's like discovering that the secret to Backstrom's on-ice prowess might be sown in the very fields of North Dakota, much like a tale spun from the enchanting threads of statistical serendipity and agricultural intrigue.

This unlikely association between soybeans and slap shots raises more eyebrows than a group of aliens mistakenly landing at a statistical convention. It's a reminder that the whimsical world of research is rife with unexpected connections and delightful surprises, akin to stumbling upon a statistical unicorn frolicking through a forest of data.

We can confidently assert that further research in this area is as necessary as a fish needs a bicycle. Let's bid adieu to this statistical rollercoaster and revel in the delightful absurdity of our findings. It's clear that sometimes, the most remarkable connections emerge from the most unlikely pairings, much like finding out that pineapple belongs on pizza.

So, let's raise a statistical toast to the remarkable synergy between soybeans and slap shots, and assert wholeheartedly that no more research is needed in this area. It's time to celebrate this statistical union like a wildly successful experiment in a lab full of bumbling researchers. Cheers to the whimsical, the absurd, and the utterly delightful - until our next statistical escapade beckons!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Soybean Score: Exploring the Interplay Between GMO Use in North Dakota and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL Stint. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agro-Hockey Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Soybean Score: Exploring the Interplay Between GMO Use in North Dakota and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL Stint. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Agro-Genetic Studies and Sports Analytics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Soybean Score: Exploring the Interplay Between GMO Use in North Dakota and Nicklas Backstrom's NHL Stint with an abstract of GMO soybeans have long been a topic of debate and discussion, much like the career of NHL star Nicklas Backstrom. In this paper, we delve into the whimsical world of statistical analysis to explore the intriguing correlation between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and the total regular season games played by the enigmatic Nicklas Backstrom. Embracing our inner Sherlock Holmes, we investigated data from the USDA and the NHL to conduct a thorough examination of this peculiar relationship.
As we crunched the numbers, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8088943 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. Our findings provide compelling evidence that there might be more to GMO soybeans and Backstrom's on-ice prowess than meets the eye. This paper aims to spark intriguing conversations about the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena and inject some lighthearted humor into the often staid world of academic research. So, buckle up as we embark on a lighthearted, yet insightful journey into the world of GMO soybeans and NHL statistics!

ChatGPT:

GMO soybeans, North Dakota, genetically modified organisms, Nicklas Backstrom, NHL, statistical analysis, USDA data, NHL statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, interconnected phenomena, academic research, lighthearted academic paper

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota
Detailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in North Dakota that are genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota

Total regular season games played by Nicklas Backstrom
Source: NHL
See what else correlates with Total regular season games played by Nicklas Backstrom

Correlation r = 0.8088943 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6543100 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 65.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total regular season games played by Nicklas Backstrom) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.04E-6. 0.0000090389519238864730000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.81 in 0.000904% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 110,632 random variables You don't actually need 110 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.58, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota (GMO soybeans %)617482899092949494949894969495959595949392
Total regular season games played by Nicklas Backstrom (Games played)2027675061918286774248828275828180615547




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([61,74,82,89,90,92,94,94,94,94,98,94,96,94,95,95,95,95,94,93,92,])
array_2 = np.array([2,0,27,67,50,61,91,82,86,77,42,48,82,82,75,82,81,80,61,55,47,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota"
array_2_name = "Total regular season games played by Nicklas Backstrom"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 3085 · Black Variable ID: 839 · Red Variable ID: 349
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0