about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,051 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is US Rice Consumption and the second variable is Google searches for 'who is alexa'.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As US rice consumption increases, so does the collective brain power of the nation. With their newfound cognitive abilities, more people become curious about the mysterious entity known as Alexa. They ponder existential questions like "Who is Alexa?" and "What is her purpose?" The surge in rice consumption leads to an unexpected boom in philosophical discussions about artificial intelligence and virtual assistants. It's a classic case of stir-fried knowledge, where the more rice Americans eat, the more they question the nature of technological companions.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie: In a warm, inviting kitchen, a family gathers around a wooden table, enjoying a homemade meal of rice. The parents, with bright smiles, are seen talking to a sleek smart speaker, while their two kids look on, filled with wonder and bubbling excitement. The kitchen is bathed in soft, golden light, and the children's faces are illuminated with anticipation as they ask about the enigmatic "Alexa." In the background, a computer screen displays a graphical representation of a sudden surge of "who is Alexa" searches, capturing the family's amusing curiosity and connection between rice consumption and culinary knowledge. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: US Rice Consumption and Google searches for 'who is alexa'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting Sci-fi fantacy An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie a funny image you would see on reddit Cyber folk
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both US Rice Consumption and Google searches for 'who is alexa', in the following situation: Because as people started consuming more rice, they found themselves constantly saying "Alexa, how do you cook rice?" causing them to also wonder "Who is Alexa? Do they know the secret to perfect rice?" This natural progression of curiosity led to an increase in searches for "who is Alexa," linking rice consumption to the quest for culinary knowledge.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy kitchen, a family enjoys a meal of rice together at the table. The parents are asking their smart speaker, "Alexa, how do you cook rice?" while their kids eagerly join in, excitedly asking, "Who is Alexa? Do they know the secret to perfect rice?" In the background, a computer screen shows a spike in Google searches for "who is Alexa," capturing the family's curiosity and connection between rice consumption and culinary knowledge.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy kitchen, a family enjoys a meal of rice together at the table. The parents are asking their smart speaker, "Alexa, how do you cook rice?" while their kids eagerly join in, excitedly asking, "Who is Alexa? Do they know the secret to perfect rice?" In the background, a computer screen shows a spike in Google searches for "who is Alexa," capturing the family's curiosity and connection between rice consumption and culinary knowledge. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie: In a warm, inviting kitchen, a family gathers around a wooden table, enjoying a homemade meal of rice. The parents, with bright smiles, are seen talking to a sleek smart speaker, while their two kids look on, filled with wonder and bubbling excitement. The kitchen is bathed in soft, golden light, and the children's faces are illuminated with anticipation as they ask about the enigmatic "Alexa." In the background, a computer screen displays a graphical representation of a sudden surge of "who is Alexa" searches, capturing the family's amusing curiosity and connection between rice consumption and culinary knowledge.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in US Rice Consumption caused who is alexa (Google searches for 'who is alexa') to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Rice Rice, Baby: Unveiling the Grains of Truth in the Relationship Between US Rice Consumption and Google Searches for 'Who is Alexa'

The Journal of Culinary Anthropology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Rice Consumption and Google searches for 'who is alexa'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Statista and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8326709 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Rice Rice, Baby: Unveiling the Grains of Truth in the Relationship Between US Rice Consumption and Google Searches for 'Who is Alexa'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexpectedly intertwined world of US rice consumption and Google searches for "who is Alexa." Through a thorough analysis of data from Statista and Google Trends spanning from 2009 to 2022, we discovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8326709 and p-value less than 0.01. Our findings not only shed light on this unlikely connection but also serve as a reminder that in the world of data, there are always more grains of truth to uncover. So, prepare to be rice-ified and delve into the deliciously quirky world of this unconventional research connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Rice Consumption and Google searches for 'who is alexa'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Rice Rice, Baby: Unveiling the Grains of Truth in the Relationship Between US Rice Consumption and Google Searches for 'Who is Alexa'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexpectedly intertwined world of US rice consumption and Google searches for "who is Alexa." Through a thorough analysis of data from Statista and Google Trends spanning from 2009 to 2022, we discovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8326709 and p-value less than 0.01. Our findings not only shed light on this unlikely connection but also serve as a reminder that in the world of data, there are always more grains of truth to uncover. So, prepare to be rice-ified and delve into the deliciously quirky world of this unconventional research connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the ever-evolving landscape of research, one can always expect to stumble upon some truly rice-sing findings that leave us in a state of paddy-ment. We live in an age where data is the new bacon, and statistical analyses hold the keys to unlocking peculiar correlations that may seem as unlikely as a rice farmer turning into a professional juggler. Today, we embark on a journey to uncover the flavorful connection between two seemingly unrelated entities – US rice consumption and Google searches for "who is Alexa."

As researchers, we are accustomed to sifting through data like pigs rooting through truffle fields, hoping to strike gold in the form of statistical significance. Our quest began with an innocuous query: "Can rice consumption in the US truly have any bearing on the curiosity about 'who is Alexa' in the virtual realm?" Our pursuit led us down a rabbit hole of data sets, statistical analyses, and the occasional rice joke – the type that would make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile.

Our investigation takes us beyond the surface level of data, where statistical staples reign supreme and p-values hold the gravitas of ancient relics. We sought to uncover the kernels of truth buried within the rice fields, hoping to shed light on a connection that might just be the rice-ing star of the scientific world.

So, grab a chopstick and prepare to stir-fry your curiosity, because what we unearthed is nothing short of an unexpected culinary delight in the realm of research. The results of our analysis yield not only a robust correlation coefficient but also a flavor profile that could make even the most discerning statistician's taste buds tingle with intrigue. Let the aroma of p-values waft through the air as we peel back the layers of this enigmatic connection, and prepare to be rice-ified with our findings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Rice Consumption and Google searches for 'who is alexa'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Rice Rice, Baby: Unveiling the Grains of Truth in the Relationship Between US Rice Consumption and Google Searches for 'Who is Alexa'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexpectedly intertwined world of US rice consumption and Google searches for "who is Alexa." Through a thorough analysis of data from Statista and Google Trends spanning from 2009 to 2022, we discovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8326709 and p-value less than 0.01. Our findings not only shed light on this unlikely connection but also serve as a reminder that in the world of data, there are always more grains of truth to uncover. So, prepare to be rice-ified and delve into the deliciously quirky world of this unconventional research connection.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the ever-evolving landscape of research, one can always expect to stumble upon some truly rice-sing findings that leave us in a state of paddy-ment. We live in an age where data is the new bacon, and statistical analyses hold the keys to unlocking peculiar correlations that may seem as unlikely as a rice farmer turning into a professional juggler. Today, we embark on a journey to uncover the flavorful connection between two seemingly unrelated entities – US rice consumption and Google searches for "who is Alexa."
As researchers, we are accustomed to sifting through data like pigs rooting through truffle fields, hoping to strike gold in the form of statistical significance. Our quest began with an innocuous query: "Can rice consumption in the US truly have any bearing on the curiosity about 'who is Alexa' in the virtual realm?" Our pursuit led us down a rabbit hole of data sets, statistical analyses, and the occasional rice joke – the type that would make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile.
Our investigation takes us beyond the surface level of data, where statistical staples reign supreme and p-values hold the gravitas of ancient relics. We sought to uncover the kernels of truth buried within the rice fields, hoping to shed light on a connection that might just be the rice-ing star of the scientific world.
So, grab a chopstick and prepare to stir-fry your curiosity, because what we unearthed is nothing short of an unexpected culinary delight in the realm of research. The results of our analysis yield not only a robust correlation coefficient but also a flavor profile that could make even the most discerning statistician's taste buds tingle with intrigue. Let the aroma of p-values waft through the air as we peel back the layers of this enigmatic connection, and prepare to be rice-ified with our findings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their study, Smith and Doe (2010) explored the intricate relationship between food consumption patterns and internet search behavior. The authors found a surprising link between the rise in rice consumption in the US and an increase in searches for "who is Alexa" on Google. Furthermore, Jones et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of online search trends, revealing a notable spike in curiosity about the identity of 'Alexa' coinciding with the peak of rice harvest season in the United States.

These surprising findings present a conundrum that rivals the mystery of a soggy bottom pie – how could US rice consumption possibly be intertwined with the curiosity about 'who is Alexa' in the virtual domain? As we sift through the literature, it becomes abundantly clear that this unlikely coupling is anything but a mere flash in the pan. It's as though the world of data has decided to add a pinch of whimsy and a dash of unpredictability to keep us on our statistical toes.

Turning the pages from the analytical to the literary, we encounter profoundly relevant works that might shed some grainy light on this curious correlation. "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "Guns, Germs, and Steel" by Jared Diamond offer insightful perspectives on the cultural significance of food consumption patterns and their impact on society, perhaps hinting at the complexity of the human psyche when it comes to satisfying its culinary cravings and intellectual curiosities.

Venturing into the world of fiction, we stumble upon "Cloud Atlas" by David Mitchell and "Sourdough" by Robin Sloan – works that, while not directly related to our research, evoke a sense of interconnectedness and unpredictability, much like the relationship between US rice consumption and the enigmatic curiosity about 'who is Alexa'.

In the digital age, even internet memes have been known to offer valuable insights. The ubiquitous meme "I Don't Know who Needs to Hear This, but..." – accompanied by a comically philosophical statement – bears an uncanny resemblance to the befuddling nature of our research topic. It seems that even in the realm of online humor, there lies a reflection of the perplexing interplay between rice and virtual curiosity.

As we journey through the literature, it becomes increasingly evident that the connection between US rice consumption and Google searches for "who is Alexa" is not just a statistical quirk but a lively confluence of human behavior, cultural influences, and the whims of the digital world. The richness of this connection is matched only by the diversity of rice dishes across the globe, and our research aims to unearth the kernels of truth hidden within this unexpected fusion.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Rice Consumption and Google searches for 'who is alexa'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and Google Trends . You used data from 2009 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Rice Rice, Baby: Unveiling the Grains of Truth in the Relationship Between US Rice Consumption and Google Searches for 'Who is Alexa'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexpectedly intertwined world of US rice consumption and Google searches for "who is Alexa." Through a thorough analysis of data from Statista and Google Trends spanning from 2009 to 2022, we discovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8326709 and p-value less than 0.01. Our findings not only shed light on this unlikely connection but also serve as a reminder that in the world of data, there are always more grains of truth to uncover. So, prepare to be rice-ified and delve into the deliciously quirky world of this unconventional research connection.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the ever-evolving landscape of research, one can always expect to stumble upon some truly rice-sing findings that leave us in a state of paddy-ment. We live in an age where data is the new bacon, and statistical analyses hold the keys to unlocking peculiar correlations that may seem as unlikely as a rice farmer turning into a professional juggler. Today, we embark on a journey to uncover the flavorful connection between two seemingly unrelated entities – US rice consumption and Google searches for "who is Alexa."
As researchers, we are accustomed to sifting through data like pigs rooting through truffle fields, hoping to strike gold in the form of statistical significance. Our quest began with an innocuous query: "Can rice consumption in the US truly have any bearing on the curiosity about 'who is Alexa' in the virtual realm?" Our pursuit led us down a rabbit hole of data sets, statistical analyses, and the occasional rice joke – the type that would make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile.
Our investigation takes us beyond the surface level of data, where statistical staples reign supreme and p-values hold the gravitas of ancient relics. We sought to uncover the kernels of truth buried within the rice fields, hoping to shed light on a connection that might just be the rice-ing star of the scientific world.
So, grab a chopstick and prepare to stir-fry your curiosity, because what we unearthed is nothing short of an unexpected culinary delight in the realm of research. The results of our analysis yield not only a robust correlation coefficient but also a flavor profile that could make even the most discerning statistician's taste buds tingle with intrigue. Let the aroma of p-values waft through the air as we peel back the layers of this enigmatic connection, and prepare to be rice-ified with our findings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the puzzling connection between U.S. rice consumption and Google searches for "who is Alexa," our research team embarked on a data spelunking expedition, armed with an arsenal of statistical tools and a zest for unraveling the unexpected. Our journey took us through the treacherous terrain of internet data sources, where we hunted high and low (mainly just in Statista and Google Trends) for the most robust and comprehensive datasets spanning from the year 2009 to 2022.

Our first step down this convoluted path involved gathering copious amounts of data, akin to a rice farmer accumulating his harvest. The U.S. rice consumption figures were meticulously sourced from agricultural databases, with an emphasis on distinguishing between short-grain, long-grain, and wild rice varieties. We delved into the digital labyrinth that is Google Trends, meticulously extracting the search volume index for the enigmatic query "who is Alexa" with the precision of a neurosurgeon extracting a brain tumor.

With our dataset securely in hand, we donned our proverbial lab coats, pored over the numbers, and subjected them to rigorous statistical scrutiny. Our trusty tools included correlation analysis, regression models, and an occasional sprinkle of Bayesian inference for that extra dash of flavor. Each statistical test was performed with the meticulousness of a master sushi chef crafting his finest rolls, ensuring that our findings were robust, reliable, and seasoned to perfection.

As we navigated the murky waters of statistical inference, we also employed a myriad of control variables to ensure that our analysis was as pristine as a freshly steamed bowl of rice. These included economic indicators, technological advancements, and societal trends, serving as the seasoning to our statistical stir-fry, adding depth and complexity to our investigation.

Having meticulously cooked our statistical concoction, we finally arrived at the steaming pot of results, brimming with flavor and intrigue. With a glint of satisfaction in our eyes, we unveiled the surprising correlation coefficient and p-value, standing as a testament to the flavorful connection between U.S. rice consumption and the curiosity about "who is Alexa." Our statistical odyssey had culminated in a tantalizing dish, leaving our taste buds tingling with the unexpected zing of scientific discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Rice Consumption and Google searches for 'who is alexa'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and Google Trends .

For the time period 2009 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8326709, r-squared of 0.6933409, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Rice Rice, Baby: Unveiling the Grains of Truth in the Relationship Between US Rice Consumption and Google Searches for 'Who is Alexa'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexpectedly intertwined world of US rice consumption and Google searches for "who is Alexa." Through a thorough analysis of data from Statista and Google Trends spanning from 2009 to 2022, we discovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8326709 and p-value less than 0.01. Our findings not only shed light on this unlikely connection but also serve as a reminder that in the world of data, there are always more grains of truth to uncover. So, prepare to be rice-ified and delve into the deliciously quirky world of this unconventional research connection.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the ever-evolving landscape of research, one can always expect to stumble upon some truly rice-sing findings that leave us in a state of paddy-ment. We live in an age where data is the new bacon, and statistical analyses hold the keys to unlocking peculiar correlations that may seem as unlikely as a rice farmer turning into a professional juggler. Today, we embark on a journey to uncover the flavorful connection between two seemingly unrelated entities – US rice consumption and Google searches for "who is Alexa."
As researchers, we are accustomed to sifting through data like pigs rooting through truffle fields, hoping to strike gold in the form of statistical significance. Our quest began with an innocuous query: "Can rice consumption in the US truly have any bearing on the curiosity about 'who is Alexa' in the virtual realm?" Our pursuit led us down a rabbit hole of data sets, statistical analyses, and the occasional rice joke – the type that would make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile.
Our investigation takes us beyond the surface level of data, where statistical staples reign supreme and p-values hold the gravitas of ancient relics. We sought to uncover the kernels of truth buried within the rice fields, hoping to shed light on a connection that might just be the rice-ing star of the scientific world.
So, grab a chopstick and prepare to stir-fry your curiosity, because what we unearthed is nothing short of an unexpected culinary delight in the realm of research. The results of our analysis yield not only a robust correlation coefficient but also a flavor profile that could make even the most discerning statistician's taste buds tingle with intrigue. Let the aroma of p-values waft through the air as we peel back the layers of this enigmatic connection, and prepare to be rice-ified with our findings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon delving into the depths of the data, we unraveled a correlation coefficient of 0.8326709, an r-squared of 0.6933409, and a p-value less than 0.01 between US rice consumption and Google searches for "who is Alexa." If you had told us before this study that these two variables were in cahoots, we would have thought you were off your noodle. But here we are, with a statistical relationship that's as strong as the aroma of jasmine rice wafting through the kitchen.

Our findings reveal a connection that's as unexpected as stumbling upon a grain of rice in a haystack. The scatterplot (Fig. 1) paints a vivid picture of this unanticipated partnership, plotting US rice consumption against the frequency of searches for "who is Alexa" with a trend line that probably has statisticians in a stir.

We must say, uncovering a correlation of this magnitude feels like stumbling upon a golden grain in a field of chaff. It's proof that in the vast expanse of data, there are as many twists and turns as there are in a bowl of spiralized zucchini noodles.

This serendipitous connection between US rice consumption and the quest to decipher "who is Alexa" serves as a gentle reminder that in the wacky world of research, we must always keep our minds open to the unexpected. Just as rice can be the foundation of a delectable dish, our unlikely discovery may serve as the rice-ing star of statistical peculiarity. So, who knew that the world of research could be as intriguing as a pantry shelf stocked with arborio, jasmine, and basmati?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Rice Consumption and Google searches for 'who is alexa'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Rice Rice, Baby: Unveiling the Grains of Truth in the Relationship Between US Rice Consumption and Google Searches for 'Who is Alexa'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexpectedly intertwined world of US rice consumption and Google searches for "who is Alexa." Through a thorough analysis of data from Statista and Google Trends spanning from 2009 to 2022, we discovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8326709 and p-value less than 0.01. Our findings not only shed light on this unlikely connection but also serve as a reminder that in the world of data, there are always more grains of truth to uncover. So, prepare to be rice-ified and delve into the deliciously quirky world of this unconventional research connection.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study, Smith and Doe (2010) explored the intricate relationship between food consumption patterns and internet search behavior. The authors found a surprising link between the rise in rice consumption in the US and an increase in searches for "who is Alexa" on Google. Furthermore, Jones et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of online search trends, revealing a notable spike in curiosity about the identity of 'Alexa' coinciding with the peak of rice harvest season in the United States.
These surprising findings present a conundrum that rivals the mystery of a soggy bottom pie – how could US rice consumption possibly be intertwined with the curiosity about 'who is Alexa' in the virtual domain? As we sift through the literature, it becomes abundantly clear that this unlikely coupling is anything but a mere flash in the pan. It's as though the world of data has decided to add a pinch of whimsy and a dash of unpredictability to keep us on our statistical toes.
Turning the pages from the analytical to the literary, we encounter profoundly relevant works that might shed some grainy light on this curious correlation. "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "Guns, Germs, and Steel" by Jared Diamond offer insightful perspectives on the cultural significance of food consumption patterns and their impact on society, perhaps hinting at the complexity of the human psyche when it comes to satisfying its culinary cravings and intellectual curiosities.
Venturing into the world of fiction, we stumble upon "Cloud Atlas" by David Mitchell and "Sourdough" by Robin Sloan – works that, while not directly related to our research, evoke a sense of interconnectedness and unpredictability, much like the relationship between US rice consumption and the enigmatic curiosity about 'who is Alexa'.
In the digital age, even internet memes have been known to offer valuable insights. The ubiquitous meme "I Don't Know who Needs to Hear This, but..." – accompanied by a comically philosophical statement – bears an uncanny resemblance to the befuddling nature of our research topic. It seems that even in the realm of online humor, there lies a reflection of the perplexing interplay between rice and virtual curiosity.
As we journey through the literature, it becomes increasingly evident that the connection between US rice consumption and Google searches for "who is Alexa" is not just a statistical quirk but a lively confluence of human behavior, cultural influences, and the whims of the digital world. The richness of this connection is matched only by the diversity of rice dishes across the globe, and our research aims to unearth the kernels of truth hidden within this unexpected fusion.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon delving into the depths of the data, we unraveled a correlation coefficient of 0.8326709, an r-squared of 0.6933409, and a p-value less than 0.01 between US rice consumption and Google searches for "who is Alexa." If you had told us before this study that these two variables were in cahoots, we would have thought you were off your noodle. But here we are, with a statistical relationship that's as strong as the aroma of jasmine rice wafting through the kitchen.
Our findings reveal a connection that's as unexpected as stumbling upon a grain of rice in a haystack. The scatterplot (Fig. 1) paints a vivid picture of this unanticipated partnership, plotting US rice consumption against the frequency of searches for "who is Alexa" with a trend line that probably has statisticians in a stir.
We must say, uncovering a correlation of this magnitude feels like stumbling upon a golden grain in a field of chaff. It's proof that in the vast expanse of data, there are as many twists and turns as there are in a bowl of spiralized zucchini noodles.
This serendipitous connection between US rice consumption and the quest to decipher "who is Alexa" serves as a gentle reminder that in the wacky world of research, we must always keep our minds open to the unexpected. Just as rice can be the foundation of a delectable dish, our unlikely discovery may serve as the rice-ing star of statistical peculiarity. So, who knew that the world of research could be as intriguing as a pantry shelf stocked with arborio, jasmine, and basmati?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

In the whirlwind of statistical analysis, our study has unravelled a correlation of unprecedented proportions between US rice consumption and the perennial question, "Who is Alexa?" As we stand agape at the peculiarity of this connection, it's clear that our findings have not only contributed to the body of knowledge but have also added a pinch of whimsy to the world of research.

Smith and Doe (2010) and Jones et al. (2015) set the stage for our investigation by hinting at the potential entwinement of US rice consumption and the enigmatic curiosity about 'who is Alexa'. Our results not only echoed their findings but also brought them to the boil, reinforcing the notion that the world of data has a quirky sense of humor, much like a science experiment gone deliciously awry.

Our findings stand as a testament to the unpredictability that often flavors the dish of scientific inquiry. Like a perfectly cooked risotto, our results have reached a level of statistical tenderness that is as surprising as finding a pearl in an oyster – or, in this case, finding a kernel of truth in the vast ocean of data. It's as if the universe conspired to serve up a delectable dish of statistical peculiarity, seasoned with a dash of intercontinental intrigue and a sprinkle of virtual mystery.

As we reflect on this unexpected connection, we are humbled by the realization that the world of research, much like a pantry stocked with varieties of rice, holds a treasure trove of surprises and delightful juxtapositions. It's a reminder that while we may endeavor to bring order to the universe of data, sometimes we must embrace the chaos and savor the unexpected flavors that science has to offer.

So, as we stir the pot of research further, let's not forget the importance of embracing the unexpected, for who knows what other unlikely connections lie in wait, ready to add a dash of curiosity to the banquet of knowledge. And just as rice is the foundation of myriad culinary creations, our unlikely discovery may very well be the rice-ing star of statistical peculiarity in the world of research. Cheers to more statistical surprises, and the never-ending quest for 'who is Alexa'!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Rice Consumption and Google searches for 'who is alexa'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Rice Rice, Baby: Unveiling the Grains of Truth in the Relationship Between US Rice Consumption and Google Searches for 'Who is Alexa'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexpectedly intertwined world of US rice consumption and Google searches for "who is Alexa." Through a thorough analysis of data from Statista and Google Trends spanning from 2009 to 2022, we discovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8326709 and p-value less than 0.01. Our findings not only shed light on this unlikely connection but also serve as a reminder that in the world of data, there are always more grains of truth to uncover. So, prepare to be rice-ified and delve into the deliciously quirky world of this unconventional research connection.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the ever-evolving landscape of research, one can always expect to stumble upon some truly rice-sing findings that leave us in a state of paddy-ment. We live in an age where data is the new bacon, and statistical analyses hold the keys to unlocking peculiar correlations that may seem as unlikely as a rice farmer turning into a professional juggler. Today, we embark on a journey to uncover the flavorful connection between two seemingly unrelated entities – US rice consumption and Google searches for "who is Alexa."
As researchers, we are accustomed to sifting through data like pigs rooting through truffle fields, hoping to strike gold in the form of statistical significance. Our quest began with an innocuous query: "Can rice consumption in the US truly have any bearing on the curiosity about 'who is Alexa' in the virtual realm?" Our pursuit led us down a rabbit hole of data sets, statistical analyses, and the occasional rice joke – the type that would make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile.
Our investigation takes us beyond the surface level of data, where statistical staples reign supreme and p-values hold the gravitas of ancient relics. We sought to uncover the kernels of truth buried within the rice fields, hoping to shed light on a connection that might just be the rice-ing star of the scientific world.
So, grab a chopstick and prepare to stir-fry your curiosity, because what we unearthed is nothing short of an unexpected culinary delight in the realm of research. The results of our analysis yield not only a robust correlation coefficient but also a flavor profile that could make even the most discerning statistician's taste buds tingle with intrigue. Let the aroma of p-values waft through the air as we peel back the layers of this enigmatic connection, and prepare to be rice-ified with our findings.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon delving into the depths of the data, we unraveled a correlation coefficient of 0.8326709, an r-squared of 0.6933409, and a p-value less than 0.01 between US rice consumption and Google searches for "who is Alexa." If you had told us before this study that these two variables were in cahoots, we would have thought you were off your noodle. But here we are, with a statistical relationship that's as strong as the aroma of jasmine rice wafting through the kitchen.
Our findings reveal a connection that's as unexpected as stumbling upon a grain of rice in a haystack. The scatterplot (Fig. 1) paints a vivid picture of this unanticipated partnership, plotting US rice consumption against the frequency of searches for "who is Alexa" with a trend line that probably has statisticians in a stir.
We must say, uncovering a correlation of this magnitude feels like stumbling upon a golden grain in a field of chaff. It's proof that in the vast expanse of data, there are as many twists and turns as there are in a bowl of spiralized zucchini noodles.
This serendipitous connection between US rice consumption and the quest to decipher "who is Alexa" serves as a gentle reminder that in the wacky world of research, we must always keep our minds open to the unexpected. Just as rice can be the foundation of a delectable dish, our unlikely discovery may serve as the rice-ing star of statistical peculiarity. So, who knew that the world of research could be as intriguing as a pantry shelf stocked with arborio, jasmine, and basmati?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a correlation that's as surprising as finding a wild grain of rice in your luscious risotto. The connection between US rice consumption and Google searches for "who is Alexa" is akin to stumbling upon a unicorn in a sea of statistical analyses. It's a reminder that in the world of data, there are more unexpected twists than a complex DNA helix.

Our findings not only spice up the statistical menu but also serve as a rice-ing star in the constellation of peculiar research connections. If statistics were flavors, this correlation would be the equivalent of a fusion dish that marries spaghetti and sushi – unexpected but strangely intriguing.

So, as we wrap up this journey through the land of rice and research, we stand in awe of the curious connections that lurk within the data-scape. The correlation coefficient of 0.8326709 and a p-value less than 0.01 serve as a gentle nudge, reminding us to keep our minds open to the unexpected, even if it's as unlikely as finding a secret stash of quinoa in a rice bag.

In the spirit of cooking puns and statistical spice, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. The rice has been thoroughly cooked, and it's time to savor the flavorful findings we've unearthed. As a wise man once said, "Too much rice research can be un-ful'filling." Thank you, and may your data always be as rich and flavorful as a perfectly cooked batch of paella.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Rice Rice, Baby: Unveiling the Grains of Truth in the Relationship Between US Rice Consumption and Google Searches for 'Who is Alexa'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Culinary Anthropology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Rice Rice, Baby: Unveiling the Grains of Truth in the Relationship Between US Rice Consumption and Google Searches for 'Who is Alexa'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Association for Agricultural Analytics and Amusing Anecdotes (AAAAA)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Rice Rice, Baby: Unveiling the Grains of Truth in the Relationship Between US Rice Consumption and Google Searches for 'Who is Alexa' with an abstract of In this research paper, we delve into the unexpectedly intertwined world of US rice consumption and Google searches for "who is Alexa." Through a thorough analysis of data from Statista and Google Trends spanning from 2009 to 2022, we discovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8326709 and p-value less than 0.01. Our findings not only shed light on this unlikely connection but also serve as a reminder that in the world of data, there are always more grains of truth to uncover. So, prepare to be rice-ified and delve into the deliciously quirky world of this unconventional research connection.

ChatGPT:

US rice consumption, Google searches, 'Who is Alexa', relationship, correlation coefficient, data analysis, Statista, Google Trends, p-value, unconventional research, US food consumption, data correlation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

US Rice Consumption
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with US Rice Consumption

Google searches for 'who is alexa'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'who is alexa' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'who is alexa'

Correlation r = 0.8326709 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6933409 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 69.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'who is alexa') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., US Rice Consumption) over the 14 years from 2009 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00022. 0.0002187160337260367300000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.022% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,572 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 13 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 13 because we have two variables measured over a period of 14 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.54, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
US Rice Consumption (Thousand Metric Tons)40824016432934923779397742843578423042994577458648604799
Google searches for 'who is alexa' (Rel. search volume)12.083312.583314.083314.083313.333313.7518.2513.916726.833345.416749.2567.333367.577.0833




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4082,4016,4329,3492,3779,3977,4284,3578,4230,4299,4577,4586,4860,4799,])
array_2 = np.array([12.0833,12.5833,14.0833,14.0833,13.3333,13.75,18.25,13.9167,26.8333,45.4167,49.25,67.3333,67.5,77.0833,])
array_1_name = "US Rice Consumption"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'who is alexa'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 3051 · Black Variable ID: 438 · Red Variable ID: 1461
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0