about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,978 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is US household spending on postage and stationery and the second variable is The number of tapers in Texas.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As household spending on postage and stationery decreased, people resorted to using electronic communication, leading to less need for traditional mail items. With fewer letters being sent, there was a decline in the demand for sealing wax, ultimately causing the number of tapers in Texas to decrease. The situation really waxed and waned for the tapers, leaving them in a sticky spot!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that resembles a scene from 'Star Wars' set in a quiet Texas town. It should portray a small stationery shop with its doors closed and a for sale sign hanging in the window. Outside the shop, there is a lone taper placed on a wooden table, untouched and unused. The sign on the shop reads "Wax Seals R Us." Nearby, an old mailbox stands empty, with no letters in sight. The decline in household spending on postage and stationery has caused a decrease in the demand for wax seals and tapers, leaving the once bustling shop and its tapers jobless. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: US household spending on postage and stationery and The number of tapers in Texas. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Low poly Cubism Data cyber art An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Voxel art
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both US household spending on postage and stationery and The number of tapers in Texas, in the following situation: The decrease in US household spending on postage and stationery caused the number of tapers in Texas to decrease because as people sent fewer letters, the demand for wax seals dwindled, leading to a decline in tapers needed to seal envelopes with wax. As the envelope-sealing industry went up in smoke, so did the tapers' jobs!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a quiet Texas town, a small stationery shop sits with its doors closed, a for sale sign hanging in the window. Outside, a lone taper sits on a wooden table, untouched and unused. The sign on the shop reads "Wax Seals R Us." Nearby, an old mailbox stands empty, with no letters to be seen. The decline in household spending on postage and stationery has caused a decrease in the demand for wax seals and tapers, leaving the once bustling shop and its tapers jobless.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: In a quiet Texas town, a small stationery shop sits with its doors closed, a for sale sign hanging in the window. Outside, a lone taper sits on a wooden table, untouched and unused. The sign on the shop reads "Wax Seals R Us." Nearby, an old mailbox stands empty, with no letters to be seen. The decline in household spending on postage and stationery has caused a decrease in the demand for wax seals and tapers, leaving the once bustling shop and its tapers jobless. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that resembles a scene from 'Star Wars' set in a quiet Texas town. It should portray a small stationery shop with its doors closed and a for sale sign hanging in the window. Outside the shop, there is a lone taper placed on a wooden table, untouched and unused. The sign on the shop reads "Wax Seals R Us." Nearby, an old mailbox stands empty, with no letters in sight. The decline in household spending on postage and stationery has caused a decrease in the demand for wax seals and tapers, leaving the once bustling shop and its tapers jobless.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in US household spending on postage and stationery caused The number of tapers in Texas to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Sticking Together: Exploring the Correlation Between US Household Spending on Postage and Stationery and the Number of Tapers in Texas

The Journal of Quirky Correlations and Unconventional Connections

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on postage and stationery and The number of tapers in Texas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8026438 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Sticking Together: Exploring the Correlation Between US Household Spending on Postage and Stationery and the Number of Tapers in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between US household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas. Our research team meticulously compiled and analyzed data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Bureau of Larbor Statistics (whoops, we mean Bureau of Labor Statistics) to unpack this unconventional connection. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8026438 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2020. This unexpected relationship between mailing supplies and amateur performers of brisk, lively dances adds a fascinating dimension to the intricate web of consumer behaviors. Through our rigorous analysis, we have unraveled a peculiar link that illustrates the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on postage and stationery and The number of tapers in Texas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Sticking Together: Exploring the Correlation Between US Household Spending on Postage and Stationery and the Number of Tapers in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between US household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas. Our research team meticulously compiled and analyzed data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Bureau of Larbor Statistics (whoops, we mean Bureau of Labor Statistics) to unpack this unconventional connection. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8026438 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2020. This unexpected relationship between mailing supplies and amateur performers of brisk, lively dances adds a fascinating dimension to the intricate web of consumer behaviors. Through our rigorous analysis, we have unraveled a peculiar link that illustrates the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between US household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas may seem as mismatched as a cowboy in a tutu, but our research aims to unravel the intriguing connection between these seemingly unrelated entities. On the one hand, we have the commonplace purchases of mailing supplies and stationery, facilitating communication and organization in the modern household. On the other hand, we encounter the curious world of tapers, amateur enthusiasts of lively and rhythmic dances that may just have two left feet.

In this study, we bring together these unexpected bedfellows and delve into the data to explore any hidden threads that bind them together. While one might assume that these two phenomena would be as unrelated as chalk and cheese, our research questions this assumption by delving into the waltz of consumer behaviors and tapping into the unexplored nuances of household expenditure and folk dance fiascos.

The correlation coefficient of 0.8026438 and p < 0.01 that emerged from our analysis for the years 2003 to 2020 raised our eyebrows more than a bad fringe trim. As we avoid stepping on any toes in our exploration, we seek to shed light on the convoluted patterns that underpin consumer choices and folk dance participation. Through this investigation, we hope not only to provide new insights into the economic and sociocultural landscape but also to bring a lighthearted twist to the often serious world of research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on postage and stationery and The number of tapers in Texas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Sticking Together: Exploring the Correlation Between US Household Spending on Postage and Stationery and the Number of Tapers in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between US household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas. Our research team meticulously compiled and analyzed data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Bureau of Larbor Statistics (whoops, we mean Bureau of Labor Statistics) to unpack this unconventional connection. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8026438 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2020. This unexpected relationship between mailing supplies and amateur performers of brisk, lively dances adds a fascinating dimension to the intricate web of consumer behaviors. Through our rigorous analysis, we have unraveled a peculiar link that illustrates the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between US household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas may seem as mismatched as a cowboy in a tutu, but our research aims to unravel the intriguing connection between these seemingly unrelated entities. On the one hand, we have the commonplace purchases of mailing supplies and stationery, facilitating communication and organization in the modern household. On the other hand, we encounter the curious world of tapers, amateur enthusiasts of lively and rhythmic dances that may just have two left feet.
In this study, we bring together these unexpected bedfellows and delve into the data to explore any hidden threads that bind them together. While one might assume that these two phenomena would be as unrelated as chalk and cheese, our research questions this assumption by delving into the waltz of consumer behaviors and tapping into the unexplored nuances of household expenditure and folk dance fiascos.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8026438 and p < 0.01 that emerged from our analysis for the years 2003 to 2020 raised our eyebrows more than a bad fringe trim. As we avoid stepping on any toes in our exploration, we seek to shed light on the convoluted patterns that underpin consumer choices and folk dance participation. Through this investigation, we hope not only to provide new insights into the economic and sociocultural landscape but also to bring a lighthearted twist to the often serious world of research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find that US household spending on postage and stationery is influenced by various economic and sociocultural factors. The link between consumer behaviors and the purchase of mailing supplies has been a subject of interest for economists and sociologists alike. Furthermore, "Doe and Smith" delve into the intricacies of folk dance participation in Texas and its implications on community engagement and cultural traditions.

Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Art of Letter Writing" by John Smith and "Stamp Collecting: A Philatelist's Guide" by Jane Doe offer valuable insights into the historical and cultural significance of postage and stationery. Additionally, fiction works like "The Secret Life of Envelopes" by J.K. Rowling and "Dances with Tapers" by George R.R. Martin illuminate the imaginative and whimsical aspects of our research topic.

As our investigation embraced a wide-ranging approach, we also considered unconventional sources. While perusing an array of grocery store receipts and delving into the underappreciated realm of CVS receipts, we stumbled upon cryptic clues and enigmatic patterns that led us straight to the heart of this perplexing correlation. The unexpected findings from these so-called "literary works" added an element of surprise and amusement to our rigorous research endeavors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on postage and stationery and The number of tapers in Texas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Sticking Together: Exploring the Correlation Between US Household Spending on Postage and Stationery and the Number of Tapers in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between US household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas. Our research team meticulously compiled and analyzed data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Bureau of Larbor Statistics (whoops, we mean Bureau of Labor Statistics) to unpack this unconventional connection. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8026438 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2020. This unexpected relationship between mailing supplies and amateur performers of brisk, lively dances adds a fascinating dimension to the intricate web of consumer behaviors. Through our rigorous analysis, we have unraveled a peculiar link that illustrates the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between US household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas may seem as mismatched as a cowboy in a tutu, but our research aims to unravel the intriguing connection between these seemingly unrelated entities. On the one hand, we have the commonplace purchases of mailing supplies and stationery, facilitating communication and organization in the modern household. On the other hand, we encounter the curious world of tapers, amateur enthusiasts of lively and rhythmic dances that may just have two left feet.
In this study, we bring together these unexpected bedfellows and delve into the data to explore any hidden threads that bind them together. While one might assume that these two phenomena would be as unrelated as chalk and cheese, our research questions this assumption by delving into the waltz of consumer behaviors and tapping into the unexplored nuances of household expenditure and folk dance fiascos.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8026438 and p < 0.01 that emerged from our analysis for the years 2003 to 2020 raised our eyebrows more than a bad fringe trim. As we avoid stepping on any toes in our exploration, we seek to shed light on the convoluted patterns that underpin consumer choices and folk dance participation. Through this investigation, we hope not only to provide new insights into the economic and sociocultural landscape but also to bring a lighthearted twist to the often serious world of research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to illuminate the perplexing connection between US household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas, our research team embarked on an odyssey of data collection and analysis that would make Odysseus proud. We scoured the vast expanse of the internet, navigating through the treacherous seas of information overload, and eventually found refuge in the reliable harbors of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Bureau of Larbor Statistics (no, not a typo, just a little joke to keep things light). With our trusty vessels of spreadsheets and statistical software at the ready, we embarked on our epic quest to unravel this enigmatic correlation.

Our initial step involved extracting data on US household expenditure on postage and stationery from the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Expenditure Surveys. We meticulously combed through the data spanning the years 2003 to 2020, capturing the fluctuations and trends in consumer spending on these essential yet often overlooked items. Meanwhile, to tap into the world of tapers in Texas, we harnessed the power of online forums, regional dance associations, and community event listings to gather data on the number of individuals engaged in this spirited pastime.

Having amassed this wealth of information, we then hunkered down for the rigorous process of data wrangling and manipulation. Our team employed a combination of descriptive statistics, cross-tabulations, and regression analyses to uncover the underlying patterns and associations within the data. We applied cutting-edge econometric techniques and dabbled in the art of time series analysis to capture the dynamic interplay between household spending on postage and stationery and the ebbs and flows of the Texan taper population.

Furthermore, in order to validate the robustness of our findings and shield them from the theoretical headwinds, we conducted sensitivity analyses and explored alternate specifications to ensure that our results stood firm against the gusts of skepticism.

With the precision of a postal worker sorting through a mountain of mail and the rhythm of a Texan taper reveling in the dance floor, we meticulously dovetailed the disparate strands of data to reveal the surprising harmony between these ostensibly unrelated phenomena. Our methodology, while somewhat unorthodox in its approach, ultimately guided us to the intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8026438 with a p-value of less than 0.01, providing us with a compelling glimpse into the synchronized cadence of household spending and folk dance fervor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on postage and stationery and The number of tapers in Texas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8026438, r-squared of 0.6442370, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Sticking Together: Exploring the Correlation Between US Household Spending on Postage and Stationery and the Number of Tapers in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between US household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas. Our research team meticulously compiled and analyzed data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Bureau of Larbor Statistics (whoops, we mean Bureau of Labor Statistics) to unpack this unconventional connection. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8026438 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2020. This unexpected relationship between mailing supplies and amateur performers of brisk, lively dances adds a fascinating dimension to the intricate web of consumer behaviors. Through our rigorous analysis, we have unraveled a peculiar link that illustrates the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between US household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas may seem as mismatched as a cowboy in a tutu, but our research aims to unravel the intriguing connection between these seemingly unrelated entities. On the one hand, we have the commonplace purchases of mailing supplies and stationery, facilitating communication and organization in the modern household. On the other hand, we encounter the curious world of tapers, amateur enthusiasts of lively and rhythmic dances that may just have two left feet.
In this study, we bring together these unexpected bedfellows and delve into the data to explore any hidden threads that bind them together. While one might assume that these two phenomena would be as unrelated as chalk and cheese, our research questions this assumption by delving into the waltz of consumer behaviors and tapping into the unexplored nuances of household expenditure and folk dance fiascos.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8026438 and p < 0.01 that emerged from our analysis for the years 2003 to 2020 raised our eyebrows more than a bad fringe trim. As we avoid stepping on any toes in our exploration, we seek to shed light on the convoluted patterns that underpin consumer choices and folk dance participation. Through this investigation, we hope not only to provide new insights into the economic and sociocultural landscape but also to bring a lighthearted twist to the often serious world of research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between US household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8026438 (p < 0.01) for the period from 2003 to 2020. This correlation, stronger than a cowboy's grip on his lasso, suggests a noteworthy association between these two seemingly disparate variables.

As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually demonstrates the strong positive correlation between household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas. It's almost as if these two phenomena are dancing in tandem, much like a pair of synchronized tap dancers. The upward trend in the scatterplot speaks volumes about the unexpectedly harmonious relationship between the purchase of mailing supplies and the pursuit of lively dance performances in the Lone Star State.

The R-squared value of 0.6442370 indicates that approximately 64.42% of the variation in the number of tapers in Texas can be explained by US household spending on postage and stationery. In other words, the consumption of stationery and postage stamps could be influencing the population of tapers more than one might expect, just like an unexpected key change in a lively Texas two-step.

Overall, these findings shed light on the intriguing interplay between consumer behavior and cultural activities, revealing a connection that is as unexpected as finding an embroidered handkerchief in a cowboy's boot. Our results not only contribute to the understanding of consumer spending patterns but also provide a lighthearted twist to the often-serious field of economic research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on postage and stationery and The number of tapers in Texas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Sticking Together: Exploring the Correlation Between US Household Spending on Postage and Stationery and the Number of Tapers in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between US household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas. Our research team meticulously compiled and analyzed data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Bureau of Larbor Statistics (whoops, we mean Bureau of Labor Statistics) to unpack this unconventional connection. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8026438 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2020. This unexpected relationship between mailing supplies and amateur performers of brisk, lively dances adds a fascinating dimension to the intricate web of consumer behaviors. Through our rigorous analysis, we have unraveled a peculiar link that illustrates the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that US household spending on postage and stationery is influenced by various economic and sociocultural factors. The link between consumer behaviors and the purchase of mailing supplies has been a subject of interest for economists and sociologists alike. Furthermore, "Doe and Smith" delve into the intricacies of folk dance participation in Texas and its implications on community engagement and cultural traditions.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Art of Letter Writing" by John Smith and "Stamp Collecting: A Philatelist's Guide" by Jane Doe offer valuable insights into the historical and cultural significance of postage and stationery. Additionally, fiction works like "The Secret Life of Envelopes" by J.K. Rowling and "Dances with Tapers" by George R.R. Martin illuminate the imaginative and whimsical aspects of our research topic.
As our investigation embraced a wide-ranging approach, we also considered unconventional sources. While perusing an array of grocery store receipts and delving into the underappreciated realm of CVS receipts, we stumbled upon cryptic clues and enigmatic patterns that led us straight to the heart of this perplexing correlation. The unexpected findings from these so-called "literary works" added an element of surprise and amusement to our rigorous research endeavors.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between US household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8026438 (p < 0.01) for the period from 2003 to 2020. This correlation, stronger than a cowboy's grip on his lasso, suggests a noteworthy association between these two seemingly disparate variables.
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually demonstrates the strong positive correlation between household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas. It's almost as if these two phenomena are dancing in tandem, much like a pair of synchronized tap dancers. The upward trend in the scatterplot speaks volumes about the unexpectedly harmonious relationship between the purchase of mailing supplies and the pursuit of lively dance performances in the Lone Star State.
The R-squared value of 0.6442370 indicates that approximately 64.42% of the variation in the number of tapers in Texas can be explained by US household spending on postage and stationery. In other words, the consumption of stationery and postage stamps could be influencing the population of tapers more than one might expect, just like an unexpected key change in a lively Texas two-step.
Overall, these findings shed light on the intriguing interplay between consumer behavior and cultural activities, revealing a connection that is as unexpected as finding an embroidered handkerchief in a cowboy's boot. Our results not only contribute to the understanding of consumer spending patterns but also provide a lighthearted twist to the often-serious field of economic research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation into the correlation between US household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas have provided intriguing insights into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated consumer behaviors and cultural activities. The findings not only offer a lighthearted twist to the often-serious field of economic research but also support prior research on the influence of consumer behaviors on the purchase of mailing supplies and the pursuit of lively dance performances.

Our study's surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8026438 (p < 0.01) for the years 2003 to 2020 aligns with previous studies that have highlighted the impact of economic and sociocultural factors on household spending patterns. The work of Smith et al. has underscored the multifaceted nature of consumer behaviors, demonstrating that economic and sociocultural influences play a significant role in shaping expenditure on mailing supplies. Our findings provide additional support for this perspective, revealing the unanticipated association between US household spending on postage and stationery and the presence of tapers in Texas.

Furthermore, our results echo the insights offered by "Doe and Smith," who have delved into the intricate implications of folk dance participation in Texas. The unexpectedly strong positive correlation between household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas reinforces the notion that cultural traditions and community engagement can have a tangible impact on consumer spending habits. This alignment with prior research emphasizes the complex interplay between consumer behaviors and cultural activities and underscores the importance of considering diverse influences when examining spending patterns.

In addition to supporting existing literature, our findings add a whimsical element to the discourse on consumer behavior. The strong positive correlation, depicted graphically as a pair of phenomena dancing in tandem, evokes a sense of playful synchronicity that challenges conventional notions of economic analysis. The unexpected harmonious relationship between the purchase of mailing supplies and the pursuit of lively dance performances highlights the multidimensional nature of consumer behavior, adding a touch of lightheartedness to the investigation of expenditure patterns.

In conclusion, our research has illuminated an unexpected connection between US household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas, underscoring the interwoven nature of consumer behaviors and cultural activities. By embracing a wide-ranging approach and drawing upon unconventional sources, we have contributed to the understanding of consumer spending patterns while infusing the discussion with an element of surprise and amusement. This unexpected correlation, as striking as finding a harmonica in a cowboy's hat, emphasizes the need to explore diverse influences when investigating consumer behaviors and serves as a reminder that even economic research can have a playful twist.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on postage and stationery and The number of tapers in Texas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Sticking Together: Exploring the Correlation Between US Household Spending on Postage and Stationery and the Number of Tapers in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between US household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas. Our research team meticulously compiled and analyzed data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Bureau of Larbor Statistics (whoops, we mean Bureau of Labor Statistics) to unpack this unconventional connection. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8026438 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2020. This unexpected relationship between mailing supplies and amateur performers of brisk, lively dances adds a fascinating dimension to the intricate web of consumer behaviors. Through our rigorous analysis, we have unraveled a peculiar link that illustrates the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between US household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas may seem as mismatched as a cowboy in a tutu, but our research aims to unravel the intriguing connection between these seemingly unrelated entities. On the one hand, we have the commonplace purchases of mailing supplies and stationery, facilitating communication and organization in the modern household. On the other hand, we encounter the curious world of tapers, amateur enthusiasts of lively and rhythmic dances that may just have two left feet.
In this study, we bring together these unexpected bedfellows and delve into the data to explore any hidden threads that bind them together. While one might assume that these two phenomena would be as unrelated as chalk and cheese, our research questions this assumption by delving into the waltz of consumer behaviors and tapping into the unexplored nuances of household expenditure and folk dance fiascos.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8026438 and p < 0.01 that emerged from our analysis for the years 2003 to 2020 raised our eyebrows more than a bad fringe trim. As we avoid stepping on any toes in our exploration, we seek to shed light on the convoluted patterns that underpin consumer choices and folk dance participation. Through this investigation, we hope not only to provide new insights into the economic and sociocultural landscape but also to bring a lighthearted twist to the often serious world of research.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between US household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8026438 (p < 0.01) for the period from 2003 to 2020. This correlation, stronger than a cowboy's grip on his lasso, suggests a noteworthy association between these two seemingly disparate variables.
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually demonstrates the strong positive correlation between household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas. It's almost as if these two phenomena are dancing in tandem, much like a pair of synchronized tap dancers. The upward trend in the scatterplot speaks volumes about the unexpectedly harmonious relationship between the purchase of mailing supplies and the pursuit of lively dance performances in the Lone Star State.
The R-squared value of 0.6442370 indicates that approximately 64.42% of the variation in the number of tapers in Texas can be explained by US household spending on postage and stationery. In other words, the consumption of stationery and postage stamps could be influencing the population of tapers more than one might expect, just like an unexpected key change in a lively Texas two-step.
Overall, these findings shed light on the intriguing interplay between consumer behavior and cultural activities, revealing a connection that is as unexpected as finding an embroidered handkerchief in a cowboy's boot. Our results not only contribute to the understanding of consumer spending patterns but also provide a lighthearted twist to the often-serious field of economic research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a surprising correlation between US household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas, a link as unexpected as finding a cowboy with a secret love for stationary. The statistical significance of this relationship, akin to a perfect dance partnership, suggests an intriguing interplay between household expenditures and amateur dance enthusiasts that even the smoothest foxtrot couldn't match. While one might expect these two phenomena to be as disconnected as a rusty wagon wheel and a line dance, our findings imply a connection tighter than a lasso around a prized bull.

The implications of our results stretch further than a pair of cowboy boots. By illustrating the unanticipated influence of postage and stationery on the population of tapers, we have highlighted the intricate and often amusing ways in which consumer choices can intertwine with cultural activities. This newfound correlation is as unexpected as chancing upon a harmonica at a rodeo.

As we wrap up our investigation, we can confidently assert that no further research in this specific area is needed. It's like finding a needle in a haystack – we've unraveled the peculiar connection between postage and stationery spending and the world of tapers, leaving no yarn unturned. This study not only showcases the surprising interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena but also injects a dose of lightheartedness into the sometimes somber realm of economic inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Sticking Together: Exploring the Correlation Between US Household Spending on Postage and Stationery and the Number of Tapers in Texas. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Correlations and Unconventional Connections


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Sticking Together: Exploring the Correlation Between US Household Spending on Postage and Stationery and the Number of Tapers in Texas. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Mail, Paper, and Adhesive Research (SMPAR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Sticking Together: Exploring the Correlation Between US Household Spending on Postage and Stationery and the Number of Tapers in Texas with an abstract of This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between US household spending on postage and stationery and the number of tapers in Texas. Our research team meticulously compiled and analyzed data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Bureau of Larbor Statistics (whoops, we mean Bureau of Labor Statistics) to unpack this unconventional connection. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8026438 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2020. This unexpected relationship between mailing supplies and amateur performers of brisk, lively dances adds a fascinating dimension to the intricate web of consumer behaviors. Through our rigorous analysis, we have unraveled a peculiar link that illustrates the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

ChatGPT:

US household spending, postage and stationery, number of tapers, Texas, correlation, Bureau of Labor Statistics, consumer behaviors, mailing supplies, amateur performers, dances, correlation coefficient, p-value, interconnectedness, consumer trends, consumer spending, research analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

US household spending on postage and stationery
Detailed data title: Annual US household spend on postage and stationery, as a percentage of total household spend
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with US household spending on postage and stationery

The number of tapers in Texas
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of tapers in Texas
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of tapers in Texas

Correlation r = 0.8026438 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6442370 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 64.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of tapers in Texas) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., US household spending on postage and stationery) over the 18 years from 2003 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.1E-5. 0.0000610019199993926500000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 0.0061% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 16,393 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.54, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
US household spending on postage and stationery (Household spend)0.3258450.3571840.3382960.3285120.3062170.3089970.2914380.2743770.2615430.2643750.2739730.2448830.2340210.2390470.249750.2156020.193540.211954
The number of tapers in Texas (Tapers)90010607508409101080810470350510101077059052035040090300




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.325845,0.357184,0.338296,0.328512,0.306217,0.308997,0.291438,0.274377,0.261543,0.264375,0.273973,0.244883,0.234021,0.239047,0.24975,0.215602,0.19354,0.211954,])
array_2 = np.array([900,1060,750,840,910,1080,810,470,350,510,1010,770,590,520,350,400,90,300,])
array_1_name = "US household spending on postage and stationery"
array_2_name = "The number of tapers in Texas"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2978 · Black Variable ID: 19974 · Red Variable ID: 14883
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0