about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,957 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Felisha and the second variable is The number of cartographers in New York.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2019, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

People just didn't want to ma--p it out anymore.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image in the style of cutesy art illustration that depicts a whimsical small town in New York. Show a group of cartographers gathered around a table, their expressions filled with confusion as they survey scattered and disorganized maps. Nearby, a colorful playground is portrayed with children laughing and playing, but one particular swing remains empty and motionless. The name "Felisha" is subtly implied amidst the ensemble of townsfolk, with the swing bearing a sense of abandonment and longing. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Felisha and The number of cartographers in New York. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie A scene from Skyrim Cutsy art illustration Surrealism Celtic art
ChatGPT: Cutesy art illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Felisha and The number of cartographers in New York, in the following situation: As the name Felisha fell out of favor, so did the enthusiasm for charting new territories. It seems that cartographers just couldn't "smell-isha" anymore and lost their direction without a "Felisha" guiding them.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small town in New York, a group of cartographers gather around a table, looking lost and confused. Their maps lay scattered and disorganized. Meanwhile, a playground nearby is filled with children laughing and playing, but one particular swing remains empty. The name "Felisha" is barely spoken among the townsfolk and the swing remains still, seemingly forgotten.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cutesy art illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a small town in New York, a group of cartographers gather around a table, looking lost and confused. Their maps lay scattered and disorganized. Meanwhile, a playground nearby is filled with children laughing and playing, but one particular swing remains empty. The name "Felisha" is barely spoken among the townsfolk and the swing remains still, seemingly forgotten. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image in the style of cutesy art illustration that depicts a whimsical small town in New York. Show a group of cartographers gathered around a table, their expressions filled with confusion as they survey scattered and disorganized maps. Nearby, a colorful playground is portrayed with children laughing and playing, but one particular swing remains empty and motionless. The name "Felisha" is subtly implied amidst the ensemble of townsfolk, with the swing bearing a sense of abandonment and longing.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Felisha caused The number of cartographers in New York to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Map-py Name Connections: The Cartographic Correlation between Felisha's Fame and New York's Namericians

The Journal of Geographic Serendipity

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Felisha and The number of cartographers in New York. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8443021 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2019.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Map-py Name Connections: The Cartographic Correlation between Felisha's Fame and New York's Namericians"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Felisha and the number of cartographers in New York, utilizing extensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our research team diligently analyzed trends from 2003 to 2019, uncovering a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8443021, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The findings not only confirm a compelling association between the two variables but also raise questions about the potential influence of nomenclature on occupational preferences. This paper delves into an unconventional realm of inquiry, offering insights that may spark further curiosity and investigation into the whimsical world of nominative determinism.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Felisha and The number of cartographers in New York. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Map-py Name Connections: The Cartographic Correlation between Felisha's Fame and New York's Namericians"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Felisha and the number of cartographers in New York, utilizing extensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our research team diligently analyzed trends from 2003 to 2019, uncovering a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8443021, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The findings not only confirm a compelling association between the two variables but also raise questions about the potential influence of nomenclature on occupational preferences. This paper delves into an unconventional realm of inquiry, offering insights that may spark further curiosity and investigation into the whimsical world of nominative determinism.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
The relationship between nomenclature and occupational preferences has long been a subject of fascination and frivolity among researchers. The whimsical world of nominative determinism has piqued the interest of scholars seeking to uncover the curious connections between names and professions. In this vein, we set out to investigate the correlation between the popularity of the first name Felisha and the number of cartographers in the bustling metropolis of New York. This endeavor emerged from a lighthearted conversation over a cup of coffee, where we marveled at the potential influence of nomenclature on career paths and pondered the possibility of a cartographic correlation. Little did we know, this seemingly jestful quip would lead us down a path of statistical analysis and empirical inquiry.

The title of this study, "Map-py Name Connections: The Cartographic Correlation between Felisha's Fame and New York's Namericians," embodies our commitment to unveiling the playful yet consequential relationship between nomenclature and the professional sphere. The punny synthesis of "map" and "happy" in the title underscores our determination to approach this inquiry with a light-hearted yet rigorous mindset.

As we delve into this unconventional realm of inquiry, we acknowledge the uncharted territory that lies ahead. The juxtaposition of a specific name with a specialized profession is indeed an unconventional avenue for investigation. However, our analysis progresses with a spirit of curiosity and a touch of whimsy, as we embark on an exploration of the unexpected ties between the popularity of a moniker and the career choices of individuals in the field of cartography.

We commence our investigation by introducing the data sources and analytical methods employed to probe the correlation between the moniker "Felisha" and the population of cartographers in the vibrant urban landscape of New York. Our findings not only illuminate the intriguing association between these seemingly disparate variables but also stand to provoke further inquiry into the whimsical world of nominative determinism.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Felisha and The number of cartographers in New York. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Map-py Name Connections: The Cartographic Correlation between Felisha's Fame and New York's Namericians"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Felisha and the number of cartographers in New York, utilizing extensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our research team diligently analyzed trends from 2003 to 2019, uncovering a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8443021, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The findings not only confirm a compelling association between the two variables but also raise questions about the potential influence of nomenclature on occupational preferences. This paper delves into an unconventional realm of inquiry, offering insights that may spark further curiosity and investigation into the whimsical world of nominative determinism.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between nomenclature and occupational preferences has long been a subject of fascination and frivolity among researchers. The whimsical world of nominative determinism has piqued the interest of scholars seeking to uncover the curious connections between names and professions. In this vein, we set out to investigate the correlation between the popularity of the first name Felisha and the number of cartographers in the bustling metropolis of New York. This endeavor emerged from a lighthearted conversation over a cup of coffee, where we marveled at the potential influence of nomenclature on career paths and pondered the possibility of a cartographic correlation. Little did we know, this seemingly jestful quip would lead us down a path of statistical analysis and empirical inquiry.
The title of this study, "Map-py Name Connections: The Cartographic Correlation between Felisha's Fame and New York's Namericians," embodies our commitment to unveiling the playful yet consequential relationship between nomenclature and the professional sphere. The punny synthesis of "map" and "happy" in the title underscores our determination to approach this inquiry with a light-hearted yet rigorous mindset.
As we delve into this unconventional realm of inquiry, we acknowledge the uncharted territory that lies ahead. The juxtaposition of a specific name with a specialized profession is indeed an unconventional avenue for investigation. However, our analysis progresses with a spirit of curiosity and a touch of whimsy, as we embark on an exploration of the unexpected ties between the popularity of a moniker and the career choices of individuals in the field of cartography.
We commence our investigation by introducing the data sources and analytical methods employed to probe the correlation between the moniker "Felisha" and the population of cartographers in the vibrant urban landscape of New York. Our findings not only illuminate the intriguing association between these seemingly disparate variables but also stand to provoke further inquiry into the whimsical world of nominative determinism.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The correlation between the popularity of first names and the occupational landscape has been a topic of perennial interest among researchers. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive study examining the influence of nomenclature on career choices, emphasizing the significance of nominative determinism in various professional domains. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2017) explored the intriguing connections between names and occupations, shedding light on the subtle yet impactful role of nomenclature in shaping individual trajectories.

Turning to more specific literature related to our inquiry, "The Art and Science of Cartography" by Carto Grapher (2008) provides a foundational understanding of the cartographic profession and the factors influencing its prevalence in urban environments. In addition, "Name Matters: The Influence of Nomenclature on Society" by Lexi Conn (2014) delves into the intricate interplay between names and societal constructs, offering insights that may indirectly relate to the association between the first name Felisha and the population of cartographers in New York.

While the aforementioned studies and literature offer valuable perspectives on naming conventions and professional pathways, the surprising intersection of the popularity of the first name Felisha and the number of cartographers in New York presents an unprecedented avenue of inquiry. Our exploration into this uncharted territory unveils a whimsical yet thought-provoking dimension of nominative determinism, highlighting the potential impact of nomenclature on occupational preferences in a playful and unexpected manner.

In a departure from traditional scholarly sources, the fictitious works "Cartography and Felisha: Navigating Name-Occupation Dynamics" by Map Enthusiast (2012) and "The Felisha Phenomenon: A Cartographic Comedy" by Geo Graphical (2016) offer lighthearted and imaginative portrayals of the interconnectedness between personal names and the cartographic profession. The playful approach to this thematic realm serves as a reminder of the serendipitous nature of our own inquiry and the unforeseen correlations that may emerge from seemingly unrelated variables.

In a tangential yet noteworthy addition, the board game "Name-Map Matchup Madness" creatively intertwines the concept of personal names with geographical elements, presenting a whimsical confluence of themes that resonates with our examination of the correlation between the first name Felisha and the prevalence of cartographers in New York.

As we navigate this unorthodox nexus of nomenclature and professional realms, we approach our analysis with an open mind and a touch of levity, recognizing the unexpected avenues that may arise in the exploration of nominal influences on occupational trajectories.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Felisha and The number of cartographers in New York. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2019

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Map-py Name Connections: The Cartographic Correlation between Felisha's Fame and New York's Namericians"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Felisha and the number of cartographers in New York, utilizing extensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our research team diligently analyzed trends from 2003 to 2019, uncovering a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8443021, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The findings not only confirm a compelling association between the two variables but also raise questions about the potential influence of nomenclature on occupational preferences. This paper delves into an unconventional realm of inquiry, offering insights that may spark further curiosity and investigation into the whimsical world of nominative determinism.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between nomenclature and occupational preferences has long been a subject of fascination and frivolity among researchers. The whimsical world of nominative determinism has piqued the interest of scholars seeking to uncover the curious connections between names and professions. In this vein, we set out to investigate the correlation between the popularity of the first name Felisha and the number of cartographers in the bustling metropolis of New York. This endeavor emerged from a lighthearted conversation over a cup of coffee, where we marveled at the potential influence of nomenclature on career paths and pondered the possibility of a cartographic correlation. Little did we know, this seemingly jestful quip would lead us down a path of statistical analysis and empirical inquiry.
The title of this study, "Map-py Name Connections: The Cartographic Correlation between Felisha's Fame and New York's Namericians," embodies our commitment to unveiling the playful yet consequential relationship between nomenclature and the professional sphere. The punny synthesis of "map" and "happy" in the title underscores our determination to approach this inquiry with a light-hearted yet rigorous mindset.
As we delve into this unconventional realm of inquiry, we acknowledge the uncharted territory that lies ahead. The juxtaposition of a specific name with a specialized profession is indeed an unconventional avenue for investigation. However, our analysis progresses with a spirit of curiosity and a touch of whimsy, as we embark on an exploration of the unexpected ties between the popularity of a moniker and the career choices of individuals in the field of cartography.
We commence our investigation by introducing the data sources and analytical methods employed to probe the correlation between the moniker "Felisha" and the population of cartographers in the vibrant urban landscape of New York. Our findings not only illuminate the intriguing association between these seemingly disparate variables but also stand to provoke further inquiry into the whimsical world of nominative determinism.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The initial phase of this research endeavor involved the meticulous collection of data pertaining to the popularity of the first name Felisha and the employment statistics of cartographers in the state of New York. The primary sources utilized for this purpose were the US Social Security Administration's database of baby names and the Bureau of Labor Statistics' occupational employment data. These repositories provided a comprehensive record of the frequency of the name "Felisha" and the count of individuals employed as cartographers from the years 2003 to 2019.

Name Fame Quantification:
To quantify the popularity of the first name Felisha, the research team employed a combination of statistical and computational methods. The frequency of the name was assessed based on the number of occurrences in the US Social Security Administration's database, considering variations in spelling such as "Felicia" and "Phelicia" to ensure a comprehensive assessment. The process entailed parsing through a plethora of nomenclatural variations to encapsulate the true essence of Felisha's appellative eminence.

Cartographic Census:
The determination of the number of cartographers in New York necessitated an exhaustive exploration of the Bureau of Labor Statistics' occupational employment data. This dataset provided a wealth of information regarding the employment trends within the cartographic domain, enabling the analysis of fluctuations in the population of individuals engaged in the map-making profession within the specified timeframe.

Algorithmic Analysis:
Upon the aggregation of name popularity and occupational employment data, a series of algorithmic analyses were conducted to elucidate the potential correlations between the two variables. Statistical techniques, including but not limited to regression analysis and correlation coefficient computation, were applied to identify patterns and trends that may lend credence to the proposed relationship between the prevalence of the name "Felisha" and the demographic composition of cartographers in New York.

Validity and Reliability:
The application of rigorous statistical methodologies and the calibration of computational algorithms were pivotal in ensuring the validity and reliability of the findings. Various robustness checks, sensitivity analyses, and diagnostic tests were conducted to substantiate the veracity of the observed correlation and to safeguard against spurious relationships arising from confounding variables or erroneous data inputs.

Ethical Considerations:
In alignment with the ethical standards of research conduct, measures were undertaken to uphold the privacy and anonymity of individuals represented in the datasets utilized. The aggregation and analysis of anonymized data served as the cornerstone of ethical research practices, affirming the absence of any undue intrusion into personal or sensitive information of the subjects under study.

The implemented methodology encapsulated a comprehensive and rigorous approach to probing the relationship between the popularity of the first name Felisha and the demographic composition of cartographers in New York, thereby laying the foundations for a systematic investigation into the whimsical world of nominative determinism.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Felisha and The number of cartographers in New York. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2019, you found a correlation 0.8443021, r-squared of 0.7128460, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Map-py Name Connections: The Cartographic Correlation between Felisha's Fame and New York's Namericians"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Felisha and the number of cartographers in New York, utilizing extensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our research team diligently analyzed trends from 2003 to 2019, uncovering a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8443021, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The findings not only confirm a compelling association between the two variables but also raise questions about the potential influence of nomenclature on occupational preferences. This paper delves into an unconventional realm of inquiry, offering insights that may spark further curiosity and investigation into the whimsical world of nominative determinism.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between nomenclature and occupational preferences has long been a subject of fascination and frivolity among researchers. The whimsical world of nominative determinism has piqued the interest of scholars seeking to uncover the curious connections between names and professions. In this vein, we set out to investigate the correlation between the popularity of the first name Felisha and the number of cartographers in the bustling metropolis of New York. This endeavor emerged from a lighthearted conversation over a cup of coffee, where we marveled at the potential influence of nomenclature on career paths and pondered the possibility of a cartographic correlation. Little did we know, this seemingly jestful quip would lead us down a path of statistical analysis and empirical inquiry.
The title of this study, "Map-py Name Connections: The Cartographic Correlation between Felisha's Fame and New York's Namericians," embodies our commitment to unveiling the playful yet consequential relationship between nomenclature and the professional sphere. The punny synthesis of "map" and "happy" in the title underscores our determination to approach this inquiry with a light-hearted yet rigorous mindset.
As we delve into this unconventional realm of inquiry, we acknowledge the uncharted territory that lies ahead. The juxtaposition of a specific name with a specialized profession is indeed an unconventional avenue for investigation. However, our analysis progresses with a spirit of curiosity and a touch of whimsy, as we embark on an exploration of the unexpected ties between the popularity of a moniker and the career choices of individuals in the field of cartography.
We commence our investigation by introducing the data sources and analytical methods employed to probe the correlation between the moniker "Felisha" and the population of cartographers in the vibrant urban landscape of New York. Our findings not only illuminate the intriguing association between these seemingly disparate variables but also stand to provoke further inquiry into the whimsical world of nominative determinism.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our study revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Felisha and the number of cartographers in New York. Over the period of 2003 to 2019, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.8443021 between these variables, indicating a strong positive relationship. The r-squared value of 0.7128460 further confirmed that approximately 71.28% of the variation in the number of cartographers could be explained by the popularity of the name Felisha. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggested a statistically significant association, dismissing the null hypothesis with whimsical confidence.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually displays this correlation, depicting a clear trend that maps out the notable connection between the frequency of the name Felisha and the population of cartographers in New York. This graphical representation serves as a cartographic testament to the lighthearted yet substantial relationship uncovered by our research team. The vibrant interplay of data points on the scatterplot illustrates the dynamic landscape of nominative determinism, beckoning observers to explore the whimsical nuances hidden within the numeric axes.

Our findings not only demonstrate the statistical bond between the popularity of the name Felisha and the number of cartographers but also shed light on the potential influence of nomenclature on occupational preferences. The correlation uncovered in this study poses intriguing questions that beckon further investigation into the curious world of nominative determinism, where the map of one's name seemingly guides the territory of professional pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Felisha and The number of cartographers in New York. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Map-py Name Connections: The Cartographic Correlation between Felisha's Fame and New York's Namericians"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Felisha and the number of cartographers in New York, utilizing extensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our research team diligently analyzed trends from 2003 to 2019, uncovering a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8443021, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The findings not only confirm a compelling association between the two variables but also raise questions about the potential influence of nomenclature on occupational preferences. This paper delves into an unconventional realm of inquiry, offering insights that may spark further curiosity and investigation into the whimsical world of nominative determinism.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between the popularity of first names and the occupational landscape has been a topic of perennial interest among researchers. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive study examining the influence of nomenclature on career choices, emphasizing the significance of nominative determinism in various professional domains. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2017) explored the intriguing connections between names and occupations, shedding light on the subtle yet impactful role of nomenclature in shaping individual trajectories.
Turning to more specific literature related to our inquiry, "The Art and Science of Cartography" by Carto Grapher (2008) provides a foundational understanding of the cartographic profession and the factors influencing its prevalence in urban environments. In addition, "Name Matters: The Influence of Nomenclature on Society" by Lexi Conn (2014) delves into the intricate interplay between names and societal constructs, offering insights that may indirectly relate to the association between the first name Felisha and the population of cartographers in New York.
While the aforementioned studies and literature offer valuable perspectives on naming conventions and professional pathways, the surprising intersection of the popularity of the first name Felisha and the number of cartographers in New York presents an unprecedented avenue of inquiry. Our exploration into this uncharted territory unveils a whimsical yet thought-provoking dimension of nominative determinism, highlighting the potential impact of nomenclature on occupational preferences in a playful and unexpected manner.
In a departure from traditional scholarly sources, the fictitious works "Cartography and Felisha: Navigating Name-Occupation Dynamics" by Map Enthusiast (2012) and "The Felisha Phenomenon: A Cartographic Comedy" by Geo Graphical (2016) offer lighthearted and imaginative portrayals of the interconnectedness between personal names and the cartographic profession. The playful approach to this thematic realm serves as a reminder of the serendipitous nature of our own inquiry and the unforeseen correlations that may emerge from seemingly unrelated variables.
In a tangential yet noteworthy addition, the board game "Name-Map Matchup Madness" creatively intertwines the concept of personal names with geographical elements, presenting a whimsical confluence of themes that resonates with our examination of the correlation between the first name Felisha and the prevalence of cartographers in New York.
As we navigate this unorthodox nexus of nomenclature and professional realms, we approach our analysis with an open mind and a touch of levity, recognizing the unexpected avenues that may arise in the exploration of nominal influences on occupational trajectories.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Felisha and the number of cartographers in New York. Over the period of 2003 to 2019, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.8443021 between these variables, indicating a strong positive relationship. The r-squared value of 0.7128460 further confirmed that approximately 71.28% of the variation in the number of cartographers could be explained by the popularity of the name Felisha. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggested a statistically significant association, dismissing the null hypothesis with whimsical confidence.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually displays this correlation, depicting a clear trend that maps out the notable connection between the frequency of the name Felisha and the population of cartographers in New York. This graphical representation serves as a cartographic testament to the lighthearted yet substantial relationship uncovered by our research team. The vibrant interplay of data points on the scatterplot illustrates the dynamic landscape of nominative determinism, beckoning observers to explore the whimsical nuances hidden within the numeric axes.
Our findings not only demonstrate the statistical bond between the popularity of the name Felisha and the number of cartographers but also shed light on the potential influence of nomenclature on occupational preferences. The correlation uncovered in this study poses intriguing questions that beckon further investigation into the curious world of nominative determinism, where the map of one's name seemingly guides the territory of professional pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The correlation between the popularity of the first name Felisha and the number of cartographers in New York has yielded fascinating results in this study. Our findings, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8443021, lend support to previous research by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2017) regarding the influence of nomenclature on career preferences. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 amuses us greatly, as it dismisses the null hypothesis with a playful twirl and affirms the substantial association between these seemingly disparate variables.

The whimsical intersection of nomenclature and occupational pathways, as portrayed in the fictitious works "Cartography and Felisha: Navigating Name-Occupation Dynamics" and "The Felisha Phenomenon: A Cartographic Comedy," serves as a reminder of the serendipitous nature of our own inquiry. While these sources are fictitious, we cannot overlook the potential influence of lighthearted insight in this uncharted realm of inquiry. It remains a delightful notion that the name Felisha, with its evocative tonal rhythm and lyrical syllables, may indeed chart a course for individuals toward the art and science of mapmaking.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) vividly illustrates the robust relationship between the frequency of the name Felisha and the population of cartographers in New York. Such visual representation provides a whimsical cartographic testament to the substantial correlation uncovered, inviting further whimsical pondering on the name-occupation dynamic. The vibrant interplay of data points on the scatterplot beckons observers to take a light-hearted yet thoughtful stroll through the whimsical nuances hidden within the numeric axes, akin to navigating an unexpectedly delightful topographical terrain.

In alignment with the literature review's tangential yet noteworthy addition, the board game "Name-Map Matchup Madness" creatively intertwines the concept of personal names with geographical elements. This lighthearted confluence of themes resonates deeply with our examination of the correlation between the first name Felisha and the prevalence of cartographers in New York. The game's playful approach reminds us of the whimsical yet profound associations that can emerge from seemingly unrelated variables, stimulating our imagination and inviting us to embrace the joy of unexpected discoveries.

Overall, our study sheds light on the unorthodox nexus of nomenclature and professional realms, contributing a touch of levity to the scholarly exploration of nominative determinism. The findings ignite further curiosity and offer a whimsical window into the profound yet delightful dimensions of naming conventions and their potential influence on individual career pathways. We eagerly anticipate future investigations into other playful intersections between nominative determinism and occupational choices, where the landscape of one's name may indeed hold cartographic implications for one's chosen professional journey.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Felisha and The number of cartographers in New York. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Map-py Name Connections: The Cartographic Correlation between Felisha's Fame and New York's Namericians"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Felisha and the number of cartographers in New York, utilizing extensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our research team diligently analyzed trends from 2003 to 2019, uncovering a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8443021, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The findings not only confirm a compelling association between the two variables but also raise questions about the potential influence of nomenclature on occupational preferences. This paper delves into an unconventional realm of inquiry, offering insights that may spark further curiosity and investigation into the whimsical world of nominative determinism.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between nomenclature and occupational preferences has long been a subject of fascination and frivolity among researchers. The whimsical world of nominative determinism has piqued the interest of scholars seeking to uncover the curious connections between names and professions. In this vein, we set out to investigate the correlation between the popularity of the first name Felisha and the number of cartographers in the bustling metropolis of New York. This endeavor emerged from a lighthearted conversation over a cup of coffee, where we marveled at the potential influence of nomenclature on career paths and pondered the possibility of a cartographic correlation. Little did we know, this seemingly jestful quip would lead us down a path of statistical analysis and empirical inquiry.
The title of this study, "Map-py Name Connections: The Cartographic Correlation between Felisha's Fame and New York's Namericians," embodies our commitment to unveiling the playful yet consequential relationship between nomenclature and the professional sphere. The punny synthesis of "map" and "happy" in the title underscores our determination to approach this inquiry with a light-hearted yet rigorous mindset.
As we delve into this unconventional realm of inquiry, we acknowledge the uncharted territory that lies ahead. The juxtaposition of a specific name with a specialized profession is indeed an unconventional avenue for investigation. However, our analysis progresses with a spirit of curiosity and a touch of whimsy, as we embark on an exploration of the unexpected ties between the popularity of a moniker and the career choices of individuals in the field of cartography.
We commence our investigation by introducing the data sources and analytical methods employed to probe the correlation between the moniker "Felisha" and the population of cartographers in the vibrant urban landscape of New York. Our findings not only illuminate the intriguing association between these seemingly disparate variables but also stand to provoke further inquiry into the whimsical world of nominative determinism.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Felisha and the number of cartographers in New York. Over the period of 2003 to 2019, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.8443021 between these variables, indicating a strong positive relationship. The r-squared value of 0.7128460 further confirmed that approximately 71.28% of the variation in the number of cartographers could be explained by the popularity of the name Felisha. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggested a statistically significant association, dismissing the null hypothesis with whimsical confidence.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually displays this correlation, depicting a clear trend that maps out the notable connection between the frequency of the name Felisha and the population of cartographers in New York. This graphical representation serves as a cartographic testament to the lighthearted yet substantial relationship uncovered by our research team. The vibrant interplay of data points on the scatterplot illustrates the dynamic landscape of nominative determinism, beckoning observers to explore the whimsical nuances hidden within the numeric axes.
Our findings not only demonstrate the statistical bond between the popularity of the name Felisha and the number of cartographers but also shed light on the potential influence of nomenclature on occupational preferences. The correlation uncovered in this study poses intriguing questions that beckon further investigation into the curious world of nominative determinism, where the map of one's name seemingly guides the territory of professional pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has shed light on the whimsical yet substantial correlation between the popularity of the name Felisha and the number of cartographers in the bustling urban expanse of New York. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.8443021, combined with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, humorously dismisses any notions of mere coincidence. It seems the name Felisha may indeed hold a cartographically compelling influence on the occupational preferences of individuals in the mapping profession.

The scatterplot, affectionately dubbed "Felisha's Cartographic Constellation," illuminates the visually captivating relationship uncovered in our analysis. This visual aid not only maps out the notable connection between Felisha's fame and New York's namericians but also serves as a whimsical testament to the playful yet noteworthy bond between nomenclature and occupation.

When considering the implications of our findings, we must navigate the uncharted waters of nominative determinism with cautious curiosity. While our research has unveiled an intriguing correlation, it is important to approach such whimsical inquiries with a light-hearted yet rigorous mindset. After all, the interplay between nomenclature and occupational preferences unveils a lively panorama of statistical musings, where the whimsical nuances hidden within the numeric axes beckon observers to explore the unexpected ties between names and professions.

In light of these findings, it seems that no further research into the correlation between the popularity of the name Felisha and the number of cartographers in New York is needed. The map-py name connections, although jovially uncovered in our study, stand as a testament to the delightfully peculiar intricacies of nominative determinism.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Map-py Name Connections: The Cartographic Correlation between Felisha's Fame and New York's Namericians. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Geographic Serendipity


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Map-py Name Connections: The Cartographic Correlation between Felisha's Fame and New York's Namericians. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Geographic Celebrity Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Map-py Name Connections: The Cartographic Correlation between Felisha's Fame and New York's Namericians with an abstract of This study explores the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Felisha and the number of cartographers in New York, utilizing extensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our research team diligently analyzed trends from 2003 to 2019, uncovering a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8443021, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The findings not only confirm a compelling association between the two variables but also raise questions about the potential influence of nomenclature on occupational preferences. This paper delves into an unconventional realm of inquiry, offering insights that may spark further curiosity and investigation into the whimsical world of nominative determinism.

ChatGPT:

"Felisha popularity trends", "New York cartographers statistics", "US Social Security Administration data", "Bureau of Labor Statistics analysis", "correlation between names and occupations", "nominative determinism research", "name influence on career choices"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Felisha
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Felisha
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Felisha

The number of cartographers in New York
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of cartographers and photogrammetrists in New York
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of cartographers in New York

Correlation r = 0.8443021 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7128460 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 71.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of cartographers in New York) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Felisha) over the 17 years from 2003 through 2019.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.02E-5. 0.0000202405635721887020000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.84 in 0.00202% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 49,406 random variables You don't actually need 49 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.61, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019
Popularity of the first name Felisha (Babies born)34262529232915201517101058056
The number of cartographers in New York (Laborers)260210200220230230220230220180130170150170150170130




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([34,26,25,29,23,29,15,20,15,17,10,10,5,8,0,5,6,])
array_2 = np.array([260,210,200,220,230,230,220,230,220,180,130,170,150,170,150,170,130,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Felisha"
array_2_name = "The number of cartographers in New York"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 2957 · Black Variable ID: 4197 · Red Variable ID: 11997
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0