about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,874 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Maverick and the second variable is Fossil fuel use in Belize.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the name Maverick gained popularity, more parents were subconsciously influenced by the image of a daring, independent individual. This led to a spike in baby boys being named Maverick, and as they grew up, they developed a fascination with all things related to being a maverick, including fast cars and motorbikes. This sudden interest in vehicles sparked a nationwide craze for driving, subsequently leading to a sharp rise in fossil fuel use in Belize. It's like the butterfly effect, but with a toddler shouting "Yeehaw" while playing with toy trucks and inadvertently shaping the country's energy consumption habits.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a small town in Belize, characterized by Brutalist architecture, with a line of fighter jets parked on the runway. The jets have the name "Maverick" painted on the side. Parents are boarding the jets, smiling and waving as they prepare to commute to work and run errands. The scene is filled with thick clouds of exhaust billowing from the jets. Nearby, a bustling gas station is depicted, with people filling up their cars with fossil fuels. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Maverick and Fossil fuel use in Belize. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: 3D Pixar Style Cutsy graphics Brutalism Voxel art Parallax art
ChatGPT: Brutalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Maverick and Fossil fuel use in Belize, in the following situation: Because as the name Maverick gained popularity, more parents were inspired by the Top Gun character, leading them to commute endlessly in their fighter jets, thus increasing fossil fuel use in Belize.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small town in Belize, a line of fighter jets are parked on the runway, with their engines running. The name Maverick is painted on the side of each jet. A group of parents, smiling and waving, are boarding the jets to commute to work and run errands. Thick clouds of exhaust billow from the jets, while a nearby gas station is bustling with activity as people fill up their cars with fossil fuels.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Brutalism ] and depicting this scene: In a small town in Belize, a line of fighter jets are parked on the runway, with their engines running. The name Maverick is painted on the side of each jet. A group of parents, smiling and waving, are boarding the jets to commute to work and run errands. Thick clouds of exhaust billow from the jets, while a nearby gas station is bustling with activity as people fill up their cars with fossil fuels. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a small town in Belize, characterized by Brutalist architecture, with a line of fighter jets parked on the runway. The jets have the name "Maverick" painted on the side. Parents are boarding the jets, smiling and waving as they prepare to commute to work and run errands. The scene is filled with thick clouds of exhaust billowing from the jets. Nearby, a bustling gas station is depicted, with people filling up their cars with fossil fuels.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Maverick caused Fossil fuel use in Belize to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Mav-erick Rises: A Fuelish Connection Between Name Popularity and Fossil Fuel Use in Belize

The Journal of Quirky Energy Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Maverick and Fossil fuel use in Belize. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9368881 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Mav-erick Rises: A Fuelish Connection Between Name Popularity and Fossil Fuel Use in Belize

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the hitherto unexplored correlation between the popularity of the first name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in Belize. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our study covers the period from 1980 to 2021. By employing rigorous statistical analysis, we established a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9368881 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust link between the two seemingly disparate phenomena.

Our findings, though initially eyebrow-raising, illuminate a potential avenue for further research, shedding light on the impact of naming trends on energy consumption patterns. The implications, while amusing, also spark contemplation about the influences that nomenclature might exert on broader societal behaviors. This work offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking contribution to the interdisciplinary discourse at the intersection of nomenclature and energy economics, laying the groundwork for future inquiries into the quirky correlations that underpin our world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Maverick and Fossil fuel use in Belize. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Mav-erick Rises: A Fuelish Connection Between Name Popularity and Fossil Fuel Use in Belize

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the hitherto unexplored correlation between the popularity of the first name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in Belize. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our study covers the period from 1980 to 2021. By employing rigorous statistical analysis, we established a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9368881 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust link between the two seemingly disparate phenomena.

Our findings, though initially eyebrow-raising, illuminate a potential avenue for further research, shedding light on the impact of naming trends on energy consumption patterns. The implications, while amusing, also spark contemplation about the influences that nomenclature might exert on broader societal behaviors. This work offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking contribution to the interdisciplinary discourse at the intersection of nomenclature and energy economics, laying the groundwork for future inquiries into the quirky correlations that underpin our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The phenomenon of naming trends and their potential impact on societal behaviors has been a subject of scholarly intrigue, prompting researchers to delve into the intriguing world of nomenclature and its curious correlations. In this vein, our study embarks on a whimsical yet substantive exploration of the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in the charming Central American country of Belize. The juxtaposition of these seemingly unrelated elements has piqued our curiosity and set the stage for an investigation that is as entertaining as it is enlightening.

It is well-established that names carry connotations and symbolism that can influence individuals' self-perception and societal roles. From the illustrious "Maverick" in popular culture to the daring spirit exuded by those who bear the name, the moniker encapsulates a sense of adventure and individualism. Its emergence as a favored choice for newborns in the United States over the past few decades has presented an intriguing opportunity to explore potential connections between appellative preferences and societal phenomena.

Simultaneously, the study of energy economics provides a platform to examine patterns of consumption and their complex interactions with societal factors. Belize, with its captivating blend of ecological diversity and cultural vibrancy, serves as a captivating backdrop for our investigation. The utilization of fossil fuels, a crucial component of energy consumption in the country, is influenced by a myriad of economic, environmental, and demographic factors. Our endeavor seeks to add a dash of levity and curiosity to this discourse by introducing the unexpected variable of "Maverick" popularity into the analytical mix.

The broader context of this research lies at the intersection of nomenclature studies and energy economics, constructing a bridge between the lighthearted allure of names and the weighty considerations of energy use. While the initial inquiry may elicit a chuckle or raise an eyebrow, it is our contention that the unearthing of an intriguing correlation carries the potential to stimulate further contemplation and scholarly discourse.

Our investigation promises to offer both mirth and insight, as we navigate the delightful labyrinth of nomenclature impact, unleashing the potential for unexpected discoveries and sparkling intellectual engagement. Join us as we embark on this amusing yet illuminating exploration, where the seemingly whimsical and the academically rigorous converge in a manner that embodies the distinctive spirit of a "Maverick."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Maverick and Fossil fuel use in Belize. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Mav-erick Rises: A Fuelish Connection Between Name Popularity and Fossil Fuel Use in Belize

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the hitherto unexplored correlation between the popularity of the first name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in Belize. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our study covers the period from 1980 to 2021. By employing rigorous statistical analysis, we established a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9368881 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust link between the two seemingly disparate phenomena.

Our findings, though initially eyebrow-raising, illuminate a potential avenue for further research, shedding light on the impact of naming trends on energy consumption patterns. The implications, while amusing, also spark contemplation about the influences that nomenclature might exert on broader societal behaviors. This work offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking contribution to the interdisciplinary discourse at the intersection of nomenclature and energy economics, laying the groundwork for future inquiries into the quirky correlations that underpin our world.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The phenomenon of naming trends and their potential impact on societal behaviors has been a subject of scholarly intrigue, prompting researchers to delve into the intriguing world of nomenclature and its curious correlations. In this vein, our study embarks on a whimsical yet substantive exploration of the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in the charming Central American country of Belize. The juxtaposition of these seemingly unrelated elements has piqued our curiosity and set the stage for an investigation that is as entertaining as it is enlightening.
It is well-established that names carry connotations and symbolism that can influence individuals' self-perception and societal roles. From the illustrious "Maverick" in popular culture to the daring spirit exuded by those who bear the name, the moniker encapsulates a sense of adventure and individualism. Its emergence as a favored choice for newborns in the United States over the past few decades has presented an intriguing opportunity to explore potential connections between appellative preferences and societal phenomena.
Simultaneously, the study of energy economics provides a platform to examine patterns of consumption and their complex interactions with societal factors. Belize, with its captivating blend of ecological diversity and cultural vibrancy, serves as a captivating backdrop for our investigation. The utilization of fossil fuels, a crucial component of energy consumption in the country, is influenced by a myriad of economic, environmental, and demographic factors. Our endeavor seeks to add a dash of levity and curiosity to this discourse by introducing the unexpected variable of "Maverick" popularity into the analytical mix.
The broader context of this research lies at the intersection of nomenclature studies and energy economics, constructing a bridge between the lighthearted allure of names and the weighty considerations of energy use. While the initial inquiry may elicit a chuckle or raise an eyebrow, it is our contention that the unearthing of an intriguing correlation carries the potential to stimulate further contemplation and scholarly discourse.
Our investigation promises to offer both mirth and insight, as we navigate the delightful labyrinth of nomenclature impact, unleashing the potential for unexpected discoveries and sparkling intellectual engagement. Join us as we embark on this amusing yet illuminating exploration, where the seemingly whimsical and the academically rigorous converge in a manner that embodies the distinctive spirit of a "Maverick."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Prior research has plodded along the well-trodden path of examining the connection between nomenclature and societal phenomena, with a particular focus on the influence of names on individual behaviors and group dynamics. Smith (2009) conducted an exhaustive analysis of naming trends and their impact on identity formation, though regrettably failing to explore the implications for energy consumption. Similarly, Doe (2015) delved into the cultural significance of names and their role in shaping social interactions, offering valuable insights yet overlooking the potential correlations with fossil fuel use in Belize. Additionally, Jones (2018) meticulously investigated the historical evolution of naming practices, providing a comprehensive overview but neglecting to venture into the terrain of energy economics.

However, the divergence into uncharted territory commences with our present inquiry, which boldly ventures into the delightful labyrinth of the "Maverick" phenomenon and its connection to fossil fuel use in Belize. While the academic landscape is rich with contributions on more conventional naming studies, such as those mentioned above, our study stands out as a beacon of quirkiness and intellectual merriment in the seemingly sober realm of energy economics.

Drawing from relevant non-fiction literature, the work of O'Leary et al. (2017) in "The Power of Names" offers a thoughtful examination of the significance of appellations in various societal contexts, laying a foundation for our exploration into unconventional correlations. In a similar vein, Johnson (2019) presents a thorough analysis of energy consumption patterns, providing a backdrop against which the unexpected relationship with the popularity of the name "Maverick" can be juxtaposed.

Turning to the domain of fiction, the works of literary giants such as Steinbeck's "East of Eden" and Brontë's "Jane Eyre," albeit not directly addressing our research questions, convey the enduring fascination with names and the complexities they signify. These fictional narratives, though unrelated to our investigation, serve as a reminder of the enduring allure and cultural significance of appellations in the collective consciousness.

Intriguingly, the researchers also stumbled upon an assortment of social media posts that, while lacking empirical rigor, showcased public musings on the inexplicable allure of the name "Maverick" and its potential impact on energy choices. The playful exchanges and humorous speculations observed in these digital forums underscore the innate curiosity surrounding the interplay between nomenclature and societal phenomena, mirroring the spirit of inquiry that propels our own investigation.

Thus, as we traverse the scholarly terrain, we are reminded of the inherent amusement and intellectual charm that infuses our pursuit, where the seemingly disparate threads of name popularity and fossil fuel use intertwine in a manner that teases the imagination and sparks scholarly reverie.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Maverick and Fossil fuel use in Belize. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Mav-erick Rises: A Fuelish Connection Between Name Popularity and Fossil Fuel Use in Belize

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the hitherto unexplored correlation between the popularity of the first name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in Belize. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our study covers the period from 1980 to 2021. By employing rigorous statistical analysis, we established a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9368881 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust link between the two seemingly disparate phenomena.

Our findings, though initially eyebrow-raising, illuminate a potential avenue for further research, shedding light on the impact of naming trends on energy consumption patterns. The implications, while amusing, also spark contemplation about the influences that nomenclature might exert on broader societal behaviors. This work offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking contribution to the interdisciplinary discourse at the intersection of nomenclature and energy economics, laying the groundwork for future inquiries into the quirky correlations that underpin our world.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The phenomenon of naming trends and their potential impact on societal behaviors has been a subject of scholarly intrigue, prompting researchers to delve into the intriguing world of nomenclature and its curious correlations. In this vein, our study embarks on a whimsical yet substantive exploration of the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in the charming Central American country of Belize. The juxtaposition of these seemingly unrelated elements has piqued our curiosity and set the stage for an investigation that is as entertaining as it is enlightening.
It is well-established that names carry connotations and symbolism that can influence individuals' self-perception and societal roles. From the illustrious "Maverick" in popular culture to the daring spirit exuded by those who bear the name, the moniker encapsulates a sense of adventure and individualism. Its emergence as a favored choice for newborns in the United States over the past few decades has presented an intriguing opportunity to explore potential connections between appellative preferences and societal phenomena.
Simultaneously, the study of energy economics provides a platform to examine patterns of consumption and their complex interactions with societal factors. Belize, with its captivating blend of ecological diversity and cultural vibrancy, serves as a captivating backdrop for our investigation. The utilization of fossil fuels, a crucial component of energy consumption in the country, is influenced by a myriad of economic, environmental, and demographic factors. Our endeavor seeks to add a dash of levity and curiosity to this discourse by introducing the unexpected variable of "Maverick" popularity into the analytical mix.
The broader context of this research lies at the intersection of nomenclature studies and energy economics, constructing a bridge between the lighthearted allure of names and the weighty considerations of energy use. While the initial inquiry may elicit a chuckle or raise an eyebrow, it is our contention that the unearthing of an intriguing correlation carries the potential to stimulate further contemplation and scholarly discourse.
Our investigation promises to offer both mirth and insight, as we navigate the delightful labyrinth of nomenclature impact, unleashing the potential for unexpected discoveries and sparkling intellectual engagement. Join us as we embark on this amusing yet illuminating exploration, where the seemingly whimsical and the academically rigorous converge in a manner that embodies the distinctive spirit of a "Maverick."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The current study utilized a combination of data mining techniques and statistical analyses to investigate the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in Belize. The primary data sources for the study were the US Social Security Administration's database of baby names and the Energy Information Administration's records of fossil fuel consumption in Belize. The research spanned the time period from 1980 to 2021, capturing several decades of naming trends and energy consumption patterns.

To begin the analysis, the team collated and curated a comprehensive dataset of newborn names, capturing the frequency of occurrences of the name "Maverick" over the study period. The extraction of these data from the US Social Security Administration's archives involved sifting through voluminous records and applying a combination of Python scripts and old-fashioned human scrutiny. This process allowed us to capture the temporal variations in the popularity of the name "Maverick" with meticulous precision, unearthing the nuances of its ascent to prominence within the nomenclature landscape.

Simultaneously, the team obtained detailed statistics on fossil fuel consumption in Belize from the Energy Information Administration, navigating through the labyrinth of energy data with a keen eye for patterns and anomalies. Collating information on the utilization of various fossil fuels, including coal, petroleum, and natural gas, was akin to embarking on a treasure hunt through the caverns of statistical databases, where nuggets of insight awaited discovery.

Having amassed the requisite data, the statistical analysis commenced, encompassing a rigorous examination of correlations and trends. Leveraging tools such as Pearson's correlation coefficient and multiple regression analyses, we sought to unveil the potential interplay between the popularity of the name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in Belize. Through the application of these statistical gymnastics, we endeavored to tease out the underlying associations that transcend the realms of nomenclature and energy economics, casting a revealing spotlight on the whimsical yet arresting connection under scrutiny.

Furthermore, to ensure the robustness of our findings, sensitivity analyses and robustness checks were conducted to scrutinize the stability of the correlation and to guard against spurious relationships masquerading as substantial connections. Our methodological approach prioritized the thorough exploration of potential confounding variables and spurious correlations, thereby fortifying the credibility of the identified link between "Maverick" popularity and fossil fuel use in Belize.

In the realm of statistical inference, the p-value emerged as a crucial parameter of assessment, serving as the arbiter of statistical significance within the analytical tapestry. The determination of an acclaimed p-value of less than 0.01 instilled confidence in the strength of the observed correlation, affirming the solidity of our statistical findings and lending weight to the legitimacy of the documented relationship.

The resulting analyses, while steeped in methodological rigor, unfurled an unexpected tapestry of connections, laying bare the remarkable link between the burgeoning popularity of the name "Maverick" and the trajectory of fossil fuel consumption in Belize. The amalgamation of whimsy and scholarly inquiry in this exploration epitomizes the eclectic spirit of academic research, where the inexplicable conundrums of nomenclature intersect with the practicalities of energy economics, yielding a blend of amusement and insight that characterizes the vibrant milieu of scientific inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Maverick and Fossil fuel use in Belize. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9368881, r-squared of 0.8777593, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Mav-erick Rises: A Fuelish Connection Between Name Popularity and Fossil Fuel Use in Belize

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the hitherto unexplored correlation between the popularity of the first name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in Belize. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our study covers the period from 1980 to 2021. By employing rigorous statistical analysis, we established a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9368881 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust link between the two seemingly disparate phenomena.

Our findings, though initially eyebrow-raising, illuminate a potential avenue for further research, shedding light on the impact of naming trends on energy consumption patterns. The implications, while amusing, also spark contemplation about the influences that nomenclature might exert on broader societal behaviors. This work offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking contribution to the interdisciplinary discourse at the intersection of nomenclature and energy economics, laying the groundwork for future inquiries into the quirky correlations that underpin our world.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The phenomenon of naming trends and their potential impact on societal behaviors has been a subject of scholarly intrigue, prompting researchers to delve into the intriguing world of nomenclature and its curious correlations. In this vein, our study embarks on a whimsical yet substantive exploration of the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in the charming Central American country of Belize. The juxtaposition of these seemingly unrelated elements has piqued our curiosity and set the stage for an investigation that is as entertaining as it is enlightening.
It is well-established that names carry connotations and symbolism that can influence individuals' self-perception and societal roles. From the illustrious "Maverick" in popular culture to the daring spirit exuded by those who bear the name, the moniker encapsulates a sense of adventure and individualism. Its emergence as a favored choice for newborns in the United States over the past few decades has presented an intriguing opportunity to explore potential connections between appellative preferences and societal phenomena.
Simultaneously, the study of energy economics provides a platform to examine patterns of consumption and their complex interactions with societal factors. Belize, with its captivating blend of ecological diversity and cultural vibrancy, serves as a captivating backdrop for our investigation. The utilization of fossil fuels, a crucial component of energy consumption in the country, is influenced by a myriad of economic, environmental, and demographic factors. Our endeavor seeks to add a dash of levity and curiosity to this discourse by introducing the unexpected variable of "Maverick" popularity into the analytical mix.
The broader context of this research lies at the intersection of nomenclature studies and energy economics, constructing a bridge between the lighthearted allure of names and the weighty considerations of energy use. While the initial inquiry may elicit a chuckle or raise an eyebrow, it is our contention that the unearthing of an intriguing correlation carries the potential to stimulate further contemplation and scholarly discourse.
Our investigation promises to offer both mirth and insight, as we navigate the delightful labyrinth of nomenclature impact, unleashing the potential for unexpected discoveries and sparkling intellectual engagement. Join us as we embark on this amusing yet illuminating exploration, where the seemingly whimsical and the academically rigorous converge in a manner that embodies the distinctive spirit of a "Maverick."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in Belize yielded intriguing results. We found a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9368881, with an r-squared of 0.8777593, and a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a significant relationship. This suggests that there is indeed a compelling linkage between the ascent of the name "Maverick" and the utilization of fossil fuels in this charming Central American country.

The robust correlation, as depicted in Figure 1, presents a striking visual affirmation of the covariation between the two variables. This scatterplot illustrates the compelling relationship, showcasing the synchronous fluctuations between the popularity of the appellation "Maverick" and the consumption of fossil fuels in Belize over the period from 1980 to 2021.

The findings not only highlight the surprising synchronicity between an individual's choice of nomenclature and a nation's energy consumption patterns but also prompt reflection on the whimsical ways in which seemingly unrelated phenomena can intertwine. While the implications may elicit a raised eyebrow or a wry smile, they also inspire contemplation about the peculiar influences that names may exert on broader societal behaviors.

This investigation offers an illuminating revelation, opening the door to further inquiries that ruminate on the potential impact of naming trends on societal patterns. Our discernment of this correlation serves as a whimsical yet thought-provoking contribution to the interdisciplinary discourse at the confluence of nomenclature and energy economics. It sets the stage for future explorations into the enchantingly unexpected correlations that underpin our world, reminding us that in the realm of scholarly inquiry, one should always expect the unanticipated.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Maverick and Fossil fuel use in Belize. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Mav-erick Rises: A Fuelish Connection Between Name Popularity and Fossil Fuel Use in Belize

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the hitherto unexplored correlation between the popularity of the first name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in Belize. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our study covers the period from 1980 to 2021. By employing rigorous statistical analysis, we established a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9368881 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust link between the two seemingly disparate phenomena.

Our findings, though initially eyebrow-raising, illuminate a potential avenue for further research, shedding light on the impact of naming trends on energy consumption patterns. The implications, while amusing, also spark contemplation about the influences that nomenclature might exert on broader societal behaviors. This work offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking contribution to the interdisciplinary discourse at the intersection of nomenclature and energy economics, laying the groundwork for future inquiries into the quirky correlations that underpin our world.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Prior research has plodded along the well-trodden path of examining the connection between nomenclature and societal phenomena, with a particular focus on the influence of names on individual behaviors and group dynamics. Smith (2009) conducted an exhaustive analysis of naming trends and their impact on identity formation, though regrettably failing to explore the implications for energy consumption. Similarly, Doe (2015) delved into the cultural significance of names and their role in shaping social interactions, offering valuable insights yet overlooking the potential correlations with fossil fuel use in Belize. Additionally, Jones (2018) meticulously investigated the historical evolution of naming practices, providing a comprehensive overview but neglecting to venture into the terrain of energy economics.
However, the divergence into uncharted territory commences with our present inquiry, which boldly ventures into the delightful labyrinth of the "Maverick" phenomenon and its connection to fossil fuel use in Belize. While the academic landscape is rich with contributions on more conventional naming studies, such as those mentioned above, our study stands out as a beacon of quirkiness and intellectual merriment in the seemingly sober realm of energy economics.
Drawing from relevant non-fiction literature, the work of O'Leary et al. (2017) in "The Power of Names" offers a thoughtful examination of the significance of appellations in various societal contexts, laying a foundation for our exploration into unconventional correlations. In a similar vein, Johnson (2019) presents a thorough analysis of energy consumption patterns, providing a backdrop against which the unexpected relationship with the popularity of the name "Maverick" can be juxtaposed.
Turning to the domain of fiction, the works of literary giants such as Steinbeck's "East of Eden" and Brontë's "Jane Eyre," albeit not directly addressing our research questions, convey the enduring fascination with names and the complexities they signify. These fictional narratives, though unrelated to our investigation, serve as a reminder of the enduring allure and cultural significance of appellations in the collective consciousness.
Intriguingly, the researchers also stumbled upon an assortment of social media posts that, while lacking empirical rigor, showcased public musings on the inexplicable allure of the name "Maverick" and its potential impact on energy choices. The playful exchanges and humorous speculations observed in these digital forums underscore the innate curiosity surrounding the interplay between nomenclature and societal phenomena, mirroring the spirit of inquiry that propels our own investigation.
Thus, as we traverse the scholarly terrain, we are reminded of the inherent amusement and intellectual charm that infuses our pursuit, where the seemingly disparate threads of name popularity and fossil fuel use intertwine in a manner that teases the imagination and sparks scholarly reverie.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in Belize yielded intriguing results. We found a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9368881, with an r-squared of 0.8777593, and a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a significant relationship. This suggests that there is indeed a compelling linkage between the ascent of the name "Maverick" and the utilization of fossil fuels in this charming Central American country.
The robust correlation, as depicted in Figure 1, presents a striking visual affirmation of the covariation between the two variables. This scatterplot illustrates the compelling relationship, showcasing the synchronous fluctuations between the popularity of the appellation "Maverick" and the consumption of fossil fuels in Belize over the period from 1980 to 2021.
The findings not only highlight the surprising synchronicity between an individual's choice of nomenclature and a nation's energy consumption patterns but also prompt reflection on the whimsical ways in which seemingly unrelated phenomena can intertwine. While the implications may elicit a raised eyebrow or a wry smile, they also inspire contemplation about the peculiar influences that names may exert on broader societal behaviors.
This investigation offers an illuminating revelation, opening the door to further inquiries that ruminate on the potential impact of naming trends on societal patterns. Our discernment of this correlation serves as a whimsical yet thought-provoking contribution to the interdisciplinary discourse at the confluence of nomenclature and energy economics. It sets the stage for future explorations into the enchantingly unexpected correlations that underpin our world, reminding us that in the realm of scholarly inquiry, one should always expect the unanticipated.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The presented findings elucidate a captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in Belize. The statistical analysis established a remarkably strong correlation coefficient and a significant p-value, affirming the robust link between these seemingly incongruous variables. These results echo the prior research, which we initially regarded with a mix of lightheartedness and profound curiosity.

While the literature review may have seemed like a merry-go-round of whimsy, the serious undertones of our present inquiry are unmistakable. The study's outcomes bolster the inquiries of Smith (2009) into naming trends and their impact on individual behaviors, shedding light on the potential influence of appellations on societal energy consumption patterns. Additionally, the correlation observed resonates with the musings of Johnson (2019) on energy consumption patterns, unexpectedly weaving the captivating narrative of a name into the tapestry of energy economics.

The fortuitous correlation uncovered in this study represents a surprising yet substantive addition to the scholarly dialogue at the confluence of nomenclature and energy economics. Indeed, the unexpected connection between the popularity of the name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in Belize offers a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical interplay of naming trends and societal behaviors. This revelation not only sparks merriment but also invites thoughtful contemplation about the eccentric influences that names may exert on broader societal phenomena, reminding us that the scholarly landscape is rife with delightful surprises.

As we undertake further explorations into the potential impact of naming trends on societal patterns, it becomes clear that our study, though initially imbued with a touch of levity, offers a significant contribution to the interdisciplinary discourse. Our findings prod the scholarly community to embrace the unexpected and to remain open to the captivating confluences of seemingly unrelated phenomena, reminding us that scholarly inquiry, much like life itself, is full of delightful quirks and enigmas waiting to be unravelled.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Maverick and Fossil fuel use in Belize. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Mav-erick Rises: A Fuelish Connection Between Name Popularity and Fossil Fuel Use in Belize

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the hitherto unexplored correlation between the popularity of the first name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in Belize. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our study covers the period from 1980 to 2021. By employing rigorous statistical analysis, we established a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9368881 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust link between the two seemingly disparate phenomena.

Our findings, though initially eyebrow-raising, illuminate a potential avenue for further research, shedding light on the impact of naming trends on energy consumption patterns. The implications, while amusing, also spark contemplation about the influences that nomenclature might exert on broader societal behaviors. This work offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking contribution to the interdisciplinary discourse at the intersection of nomenclature and energy economics, laying the groundwork for future inquiries into the quirky correlations that underpin our world.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The phenomenon of naming trends and their potential impact on societal behaviors has been a subject of scholarly intrigue, prompting researchers to delve into the intriguing world of nomenclature and its curious correlations. In this vein, our study embarks on a whimsical yet substantive exploration of the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in the charming Central American country of Belize. The juxtaposition of these seemingly unrelated elements has piqued our curiosity and set the stage for an investigation that is as entertaining as it is enlightening.
It is well-established that names carry connotations and symbolism that can influence individuals' self-perception and societal roles. From the illustrious "Maverick" in popular culture to the daring spirit exuded by those who bear the name, the moniker encapsulates a sense of adventure and individualism. Its emergence as a favored choice for newborns in the United States over the past few decades has presented an intriguing opportunity to explore potential connections between appellative preferences and societal phenomena.
Simultaneously, the study of energy economics provides a platform to examine patterns of consumption and their complex interactions with societal factors. Belize, with its captivating blend of ecological diversity and cultural vibrancy, serves as a captivating backdrop for our investigation. The utilization of fossil fuels, a crucial component of energy consumption in the country, is influenced by a myriad of economic, environmental, and demographic factors. Our endeavor seeks to add a dash of levity and curiosity to this discourse by introducing the unexpected variable of "Maverick" popularity into the analytical mix.
The broader context of this research lies at the intersection of nomenclature studies and energy economics, constructing a bridge between the lighthearted allure of names and the weighty considerations of energy use. While the initial inquiry may elicit a chuckle or raise an eyebrow, it is our contention that the unearthing of an intriguing correlation carries the potential to stimulate further contemplation and scholarly discourse.
Our investigation promises to offer both mirth and insight, as we navigate the delightful labyrinth of nomenclature impact, unleashing the potential for unexpected discoveries and sparkling intellectual engagement. Join us as we embark on this amusing yet illuminating exploration, where the seemingly whimsical and the academically rigorous converge in a manner that embodies the distinctive spirit of a "Maverick."

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in Belize yielded intriguing results. We found a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9368881, with an r-squared of 0.8777593, and a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a significant relationship. This suggests that there is indeed a compelling linkage between the ascent of the name "Maverick" and the utilization of fossil fuels in this charming Central American country.
The robust correlation, as depicted in Figure 1, presents a striking visual affirmation of the covariation between the two variables. This scatterplot illustrates the compelling relationship, showcasing the synchronous fluctuations between the popularity of the appellation "Maverick" and the consumption of fossil fuels in Belize over the period from 1980 to 2021.
The findings not only highlight the surprising synchronicity between an individual's choice of nomenclature and a nation's energy consumption patterns but also prompt reflection on the whimsical ways in which seemingly unrelated phenomena can intertwine. While the implications may elicit a raised eyebrow or a wry smile, they also inspire contemplation about the peculiar influences that names may exert on broader societal behaviors.
This investigation offers an illuminating revelation, opening the door to further inquiries that ruminate on the potential impact of naming trends on societal patterns. Our discernment of this correlation serves as a whimsical yet thought-provoking contribution to the interdisciplinary discourse at the confluence of nomenclature and energy economics. It sets the stage for future explorations into the enchantingly unexpected correlations that underpin our world, reminding us that in the realm of scholarly inquiry, one should always expect the unanticipated.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has illuminated a compelling correlation between the popularity of the name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in Belize. The remarkably strong correlation coefficient and significant p-value affirm the unexpected link between these two seemingly disparate phenomena. While our findings may elicit a chuckle or two, they also offer a tantalizing glimpse into the delightful labyrinth of nomenclature impact on societal behaviors and energy consumption patterns.

The whimsical yet substantive nature of our investigation underscores the potential for unexpected discoveries and sparkling intellectual engagement at the intersection of seemingly unrelated fields. The visual affirmation provided by our scatterplot serves as a compelling testament to the synchronous fluctuations between the ascent of the name "Maverick" and the utilization of fossil fuels in Belize. It is an affirmation that in the world of scholarly inquiry, one should always expect the unanticipated, and perhaps even the fuelish.

Despite the amusement that our findings may provoke, they also beckon further contemplation about the curious influences of naming trends on societal behaviors. The implications, both droll and insightful, prompt scholars to consider the unexplored avenues of influence that names may exert on broader societal patterns. However, given the levity and specificity of our findings, it is our contention that no further research is needed in this area. We hope that our work serves as a source of amusement and inspiration for future explorations into the whimsical correlations that underpin our world.

In the spirit of merriment, and with a nod to the adventurous "Mavericks" and their fuelish ways, we conclude that this investigation offers a lighthearted yet compelling addition to the scholarly discourse, reminding us that even in the serious pursuit of knowledge, there is always room for a touch of mirth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Mav-erick Rises: A Fuelish Connection Between Name Popularity and Fossil Fuel Use in Belize. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Mav-erick Rises: A Fuelish Connection Between Name Popularity and Fossil Fuel Use in Belize. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Atmospheric and Geographical Exploration (SAGE)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Mav-erick Rises: A Fuelish Connection Between Name Popularity and Fossil Fuel Use in Belize with an abstract of This paper examines the hitherto unexplored correlation between the popularity of the first name "Maverick" and fossil fuel use in Belize. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our study covers the period from 1980 to 2021. By employing rigorous statistical analysis, we established a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9368881 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust link between the two seemingly disparate phenomena.
Our findings, though initially eyebrow-raising, illuminate a potential avenue for further research, shedding light on the impact of naming trends on energy consumption patterns. The implications, while amusing, also spark contemplation about the influences that nomenclature might exert on broader societal behaviors. This work offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking contribution to the interdisciplinary discourse at the intersection of nomenclature and energy economics, laying the groundwork for future inquiries into the quirky correlations that underpin our world.

ChatGPT:

"Maverick name popularity," "fossil fuel use Belize," "nomenclature energy consumption correlation," "US Social Security Administration data," "Energy Information Administration statistics," "correlation coefficient energy consumption naming trends," "naming trends and societal behaviors," "interdisciplinary discourse nomenclature energy economics."

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Maverick
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Maverick
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Maverick

Fossil fuel use in Belize
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in Belize in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in Belize

Correlation r = 0.9368881 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8777593 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 87.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Fossil fuel use in Belize) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Maverick) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.4E-20. 0.0000000000000000000740282437
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 7.4E-18% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 13,508,357,756,703,068,160 random variables You don't actually need 13 quintillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.88, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Maverick (Babies born)1411141361619444854758876101128148167189191188184229216249236331400461534483509646868131518982298298447645098582361906687
Fossil fuel use in Belize (Billion kWh)0.0510.0520.0530.0550.0630.0670.070.0750.0850.0890.1020.1180.1320.1480.1350.1020.0860.0920.0870.0860.0710.0433670.0464910.0978890.0843690.087260.0322450.03860.011450.04899330.1519440.08281210.1631760.1122570.1477990.1810180.1532040.3653810.401440.40.3797850.404092




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([14,11,14,13,6,16,19,44,48,54,75,88,76,101,128,148,167,189,191,188,184,229,216,249,236,331,400,461,534,483,509,646,868,1315,1898,2298,2984,4764,5098,5823,6190,6687,])
array_2 = np.array([0.051,0.052,0.053,0.055,0.063,0.067,0.07,0.075,0.085,0.089,0.102,0.118,0.132,0.148,0.135,0.102,0.086,0.092,0.087,0.086,0.071,0.043367,0.046491,0.097889,0.084369,0.08726,0.032245,0.0386,0.01145,0.0489933,0.151944,0.0828121,0.163176,0.112257,0.147799,0.181018,0.153204,0.365381,0.40144,0.4,0.379785,0.404092,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Maverick"
array_2_name = "Fossil fuel use in Belize"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 2874 · Black Variable ID: 3886 · Red Variable ID: 23512
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0