about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,864 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Hickory, North Carolina and the second variable is The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air became cleaner in Hickory, the trees and shrubs in North Carolina started to flourish without restraint. This led to an unprecedented growth spurt, leaving the cutters and trimmers feeling uncharacteristically obsolete. In a surprising turn of events, it seems Mother Nature decided to take landscaping into her own branches! "Looks like even the greenery wanted to branch out on its own!"

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling street in Hickory, North Carolina, showcasing people walking without masks or bandanas. The scene should include storefronts with well-stocked displays of hand cutters and trimmers. The overall aesthetic should reflect a clean and modern atmosphere, with a focus on the reduction of pandemic-related accessories and the prominence of high-tech tools. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Hickory, North Carolina and The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Photorealism Surrealism High-tech Macabre
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Hickory, North Carolina and The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina, in the following situation: Because as air pollution decreased, people no longer needed to wear masks and bandanas, which led to a decline in the demand for hand cutters and trimmers for stylish pandemic accessories.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Hickory, North Carolina, the air is noticeably clearer as people walk through the streets without masks or bandanas. With less need for stylish pandemic accessories, the demand for hand cutters and trimmers has decreased, and the local shops have plenty of these tools in stock.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In Hickory, North Carolina, the air is noticeably clearer as people walk through the streets without masks or bandanas. With less need for stylish pandemic accessories, the demand for hand cutters and trimmers has decreased, and the local shops have plenty of these tools in stock. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling street in Hickory, North Carolina, showcasing people walking without masks or bandanas. The scene should include storefronts with well-stocked displays of hand cutters and trimmers. The overall aesthetic should reflect a clean and modern atmosphere, with a focus on the reduction of pandemic-related accessories and the prominence of high-tech tools.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Hickory, North Carolina caused The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Cutting Edge: A Study of the Correlation between Air Pollution in Hickory, North Carolina, and the Number of Cutters and Trimmers, Hand in North Carolina

Journal of Environmental Epidemiology and Occupational Health

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hickory, North Carolina and The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8706574 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Cutting Edge: A Study of the Correlation between Air Pollution in Hickory, North Carolina, and the Number of Cutters and Trimmers, Hand in North Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing relationship between air pollution in the quaint town of Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of cutters and trimmers, hand located in the state. Our diligent research team, armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, delved into this unlikely connection. Employing robust statistical analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8706574 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2022.

While the initial inquiry may seem somewhat eccentric, our findings offer compelling insights into the interplay between environmental factors and occupational trends. The presence of a high correlation between air pollution levels and the number of individuals engaged in the delicate art of hand trimming and cutting serves as a testament to the intricate dynamics of our natural and human-made environments. As we consider the implications of our results, we are reminded of the old adage, "cutting through the air pollution" may indeed have more than just a figurative meaning for the dedicated individuals shaping and trimming by hand.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hickory, North Carolina and The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cutting Edge: A Study of the Correlation between Air Pollution in Hickory, North Carolina, and the Number of Cutters and Trimmers, Hand in North Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing relationship between air pollution in the quaint town of Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of cutters and trimmers, hand located in the state. Our diligent research team, armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, delved into this unlikely connection. Employing robust statistical analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8706574 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2022.

While the initial inquiry may seem somewhat eccentric, our findings offer compelling insights into the interplay between environmental factors and occupational trends. The presence of a high correlation between air pollution levels and the number of individuals engaged in the delicate art of hand trimming and cutting serves as a testament to the intricate dynamics of our natural and human-made environments. As we consider the implications of our results, we are reminded of the old adage, "cutting through the air pollution" may indeed have more than just a figurative meaning for the dedicated individuals shaping and trimming by hand.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The gentle rustle of leaves, the faint scent of sawdust, and the persistent hum of machinery in the distance – these are the sensory hallmarks of the town of Hickory, North Carolina. Amidst this tranquil backdrop, a curious relationship has come to light, one that intertwines the intangible presence of air pollution with the tangible hands that wield cutters and trimmers. Our foray into this seemingly whimsical correlation stems from an earnest desire to illuminate the intricate connections that underlie occupational patterns in the face of environmental challenges.

As we embark on this scholarly exploration, it is critical to acknowledge the idiosyncrasies that distinguish Hickory from its urban counterparts. The town's intimate setting amidst the enveloping beauty of nature belies a susceptibility to varying levels of air pollution, inviting contemplation of how such environmental nuances intersect with labor dynamics. Conversely, the distinctive rhythm of manual cutting and trimming, an artistry steeped in tradition, engenders a profound appreciation for the deft hands that shape our physical surroundings. It is this convergence of the ethereal and the tangible that forms the backdrop for our investigation.

Before delving into the methodology and results that underpin this study, one cannot overlook the inherent curiosity that sparks inquiry into seemingly incongruous matters. In the annals of scientific exploration, the chance alignment of two seemingly disparate phenomena often serves as the catalyst for unforeseen discoveries. With this in mind, our initial foray into the correlation between air pollution levels and the number of hand cutters and trimmers brims with the potential for uncovering uncharted terrain, both figuratively and perhaps literally.

Akin to the delicate precision of a skilled craftsman, the statistical machinations employed in this study have honed in on a correlation coefficient that elicits astonishment – 0.8706574, a figure that prompts contemplation of the intricate dance between ambient air quality and manual dexterity. Bolstering this staggering coefficient is a p-value of less than 0.01, a testament to the robustness of our findings and the salience of the interplay between environmental factors and labor dynamics.

As we traverse the pathways of this investigation, it becomes apparent that the whimsical juxtaposition of air pollution and artisanal handiwork conceals a richness of insights waiting to be unearthed. Beyond the veil of initial incredulity, the correlation we have unearthed imparts a deeper appreciation for the symbiotic relationship between the fragility of our natural surroundings and the resilience of human endeavor. Our endeavor is not merely an exercise in data crunching; it is a testament to the interwoven fabric of environmental influences and occupational proclivities.

In the unfolding pages of this report, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic interplay between the ethereal tendrils of air pollution and the palpable endeavor of hand cutters and trimmers. Our scholarly odyssey promises a journey through the subtleties of statistical significance and the whimsy of unexpected connections, shedding light on the unassuming nexus that binds the ethereal with the grounded. With our findings as companions, let us venture forth, armed with academia's equivalent of pruning shears, to trim the unruly undergrowth of misunderstanding and cultivate a deeper understanding of the curious symbiosis we have uncovered.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hickory, North Carolina and The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cutting Edge: A Study of the Correlation between Air Pollution in Hickory, North Carolina, and the Number of Cutters and Trimmers, Hand in North Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing relationship between air pollution in the quaint town of Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of cutters and trimmers, hand located in the state. Our diligent research team, armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, delved into this unlikely connection. Employing robust statistical analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8706574 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2022.

While the initial inquiry may seem somewhat eccentric, our findings offer compelling insights into the interplay between environmental factors and occupational trends. The presence of a high correlation between air pollution levels and the number of individuals engaged in the delicate art of hand trimming and cutting serves as a testament to the intricate dynamics of our natural and human-made environments. As we consider the implications of our results, we are reminded of the old adage, "cutting through the air pollution" may indeed have more than just a figurative meaning for the dedicated individuals shaping and trimming by hand.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The gentle rustle of leaves, the faint scent of sawdust, and the persistent hum of machinery in the distance – these are the sensory hallmarks of the town of Hickory, North Carolina. Amidst this tranquil backdrop, a curious relationship has come to light, one that intertwines the intangible presence of air pollution with the tangible hands that wield cutters and trimmers. Our foray into this seemingly whimsical correlation stems from an earnest desire to illuminate the intricate connections that underlie occupational patterns in the face of environmental challenges.
As we embark on this scholarly exploration, it is critical to acknowledge the idiosyncrasies that distinguish Hickory from its urban counterparts. The town's intimate setting amidst the enveloping beauty of nature belies a susceptibility to varying levels of air pollution, inviting contemplation of how such environmental nuances intersect with labor dynamics. Conversely, the distinctive rhythm of manual cutting and trimming, an artistry steeped in tradition, engenders a profound appreciation for the deft hands that shape our physical surroundings. It is this convergence of the ethereal and the tangible that forms the backdrop for our investigation.
Before delving into the methodology and results that underpin this study, one cannot overlook the inherent curiosity that sparks inquiry into seemingly incongruous matters. In the annals of scientific exploration, the chance alignment of two seemingly disparate phenomena often serves as the catalyst for unforeseen discoveries. With this in mind, our initial foray into the correlation between air pollution levels and the number of hand cutters and trimmers brims with the potential for uncovering uncharted terrain, both figuratively and perhaps literally.
Akin to the delicate precision of a skilled craftsman, the statistical machinations employed in this study have honed in on a correlation coefficient that elicits astonishment – 0.8706574, a figure that prompts contemplation of the intricate dance between ambient air quality and manual dexterity. Bolstering this staggering coefficient is a p-value of less than 0.01, a testament to the robustness of our findings and the salience of the interplay between environmental factors and labor dynamics.
As we traverse the pathways of this investigation, it becomes apparent that the whimsical juxtaposition of air pollution and artisanal handiwork conceals a richness of insights waiting to be unearthed. Beyond the veil of initial incredulity, the correlation we have unearthed imparts a deeper appreciation for the symbiotic relationship between the fragility of our natural surroundings and the resilience of human endeavor. Our endeavor is not merely an exercise in data crunching; it is a testament to the interwoven fabric of environmental influences and occupational proclivities.
In the unfolding pages of this report, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic interplay between the ethereal tendrils of air pollution and the palpable endeavor of hand cutters and trimmers. Our scholarly odyssey promises a journey through the subtleties of statistical significance and the whimsy of unexpected connections, shedding light on the unassuming nexus that binds the ethereal with the grounded. With our findings as companions, let us venture forth, armed with academia's equivalent of pruning shears, to trim the unruly undergrowth of misunderstanding and cultivate a deeper understanding of the curious symbiosis we have uncovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

This section presents a review of existing literature to contextualize the unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina.

In "Air Quality and Health" by Smith et al., the authors find a strong relationship between air pollution and respiratory health, highlighting the potential impact of environmental factors on human well-being. Furthermore, Doe's study on "Occupational Trends in North Carolina" delves into the diverse array of manual labor occupations in the state, shedding light on the nuances of specialized crafts such as hand trimming and cutting.

Expanding beyond the realm of scholarly works, pertinent non-fiction sources such as "The Air We Breathe: A Guide to Air Pollution and Its Impacts" offer comprehensive insights into the multifaceted nature of air pollution and its consequences. Similarly, "The Art of Precision: The Legacy of Hand Craftsmanship" provides a lens into the world of artisanal craftsmanship, capturing the essence of manual dexterity and meticulous attention to detail.

In a departure from traditional academic sources, the works of fiction also present curious parallels to the interplay between environmental factors and manual labor. In the novel "The Cutting Edge of Destiny," the protagonist's journey mirrors the delicate balance of navigating occupational pursuits amidst environmental challenges. Likewise, the classic "A Breath of Fresh Scissors" weaves a tale of resilience and adaptability, striking an uncanny resonance with the symbiotic relationship between air pollution and hand cutting and trimming.

Drawing inspiration from unexpected quarters, board games such as "Pollution Pandemonium" evoke a playful exploration of environmental perils, mirroring the complexities inherent in the real-world dynamics of air pollution and its impact on occupational trends. Meanwhile, "Precision Pursuit" introduces strategic maneuvering akin to the deft movements of hand cutters and trimmers, infusing an element of whimsy into our understanding of the subtle correlations at play.

In synthesizing these diverse sources, it becomes evident that our exploration transcends conventional boundaries, permeating the realms of both erudition and imagination. As we traverse the terrain of interconnected disciplines and narratives, the tapestry of our investigation takes shape, unfurling a rich mosaic of insights into the intricate relationship between air pollution and the craft of hand trimming and cutting.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hickory, North Carolina and The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cutting Edge: A Study of the Correlation between Air Pollution in Hickory, North Carolina, and the Number of Cutters and Trimmers, Hand in North Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing relationship between air pollution in the quaint town of Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of cutters and trimmers, hand located in the state. Our diligent research team, armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, delved into this unlikely connection. Employing robust statistical analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8706574 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2022.

While the initial inquiry may seem somewhat eccentric, our findings offer compelling insights into the interplay between environmental factors and occupational trends. The presence of a high correlation between air pollution levels and the number of individuals engaged in the delicate art of hand trimming and cutting serves as a testament to the intricate dynamics of our natural and human-made environments. As we consider the implications of our results, we are reminded of the old adage, "cutting through the air pollution" may indeed have more than just a figurative meaning for the dedicated individuals shaping and trimming by hand.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The gentle rustle of leaves, the faint scent of sawdust, and the persistent hum of machinery in the distance – these are the sensory hallmarks of the town of Hickory, North Carolina. Amidst this tranquil backdrop, a curious relationship has come to light, one that intertwines the intangible presence of air pollution with the tangible hands that wield cutters and trimmers. Our foray into this seemingly whimsical correlation stems from an earnest desire to illuminate the intricate connections that underlie occupational patterns in the face of environmental challenges.
As we embark on this scholarly exploration, it is critical to acknowledge the idiosyncrasies that distinguish Hickory from its urban counterparts. The town's intimate setting amidst the enveloping beauty of nature belies a susceptibility to varying levels of air pollution, inviting contemplation of how such environmental nuances intersect with labor dynamics. Conversely, the distinctive rhythm of manual cutting and trimming, an artistry steeped in tradition, engenders a profound appreciation for the deft hands that shape our physical surroundings. It is this convergence of the ethereal and the tangible that forms the backdrop for our investigation.
Before delving into the methodology and results that underpin this study, one cannot overlook the inherent curiosity that sparks inquiry into seemingly incongruous matters. In the annals of scientific exploration, the chance alignment of two seemingly disparate phenomena often serves as the catalyst for unforeseen discoveries. With this in mind, our initial foray into the correlation between air pollution levels and the number of hand cutters and trimmers brims with the potential for uncovering uncharted terrain, both figuratively and perhaps literally.
Akin to the delicate precision of a skilled craftsman, the statistical machinations employed in this study have honed in on a correlation coefficient that elicits astonishment – 0.8706574, a figure that prompts contemplation of the intricate dance between ambient air quality and manual dexterity. Bolstering this staggering coefficient is a p-value of less than 0.01, a testament to the robustness of our findings and the salience of the interplay between environmental factors and labor dynamics.
As we traverse the pathways of this investigation, it becomes apparent that the whimsical juxtaposition of air pollution and artisanal handiwork conceals a richness of insights waiting to be unearthed. Beyond the veil of initial incredulity, the correlation we have unearthed imparts a deeper appreciation for the symbiotic relationship between the fragility of our natural surroundings and the resilience of human endeavor. Our endeavor is not merely an exercise in data crunching; it is a testament to the interwoven fabric of environmental influences and occupational proclivities.
In the unfolding pages of this report, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic interplay between the ethereal tendrils of air pollution and the palpable endeavor of hand cutters and trimmers. Our scholarly odyssey promises a journey through the subtleties of statistical significance and the whimsy of unexpected connections, shedding light on the unassuming nexus that binds the ethereal with the grounded. With our findings as companions, let us venture forth, armed with academia's equivalent of pruning shears, to trim the unruly undergrowth of misunderstanding and cultivate a deeper understanding of the curious symbiosis we have uncovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To probe the captivating correlation between air pollution in Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina, a manifold approach was employed. The research team harnessed the power of data spanning from 2003 to 2022, primarily sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The initial phase of the methodology involved the meticulous extraction of air pollution data from diverse sources, encapsulating an array of pollutants such as particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and ozone. These data were scrutinized and synthesized to construct a comprehensive portrait of air quality in Hickory, thereby laying the foundation for the quantitative dimension of our investigation.

Simultaneously, the Bureau of Labor Statistics furnished invaluable information pertaining to the number of individuals employed as cutters and trimmers, hand, offering a glimpse into the ebbs and flows of this specialized occupation over nearly two decades. This data, painstakingly collated and cleansed, formed the crux of our endeavor to discern underlying patterns in labor dynamics amidst environmental vicissitudes.

To uncover the anticipated correlation between air pollution levels and the prevalence of hand cutters and trimmers, a series of statistical analyses was implemented. Leveraging sophisticated software, the research team executed regression models and time-series analyses, entwining the rich tapestry of environmental variables with occupational indicators. This analytical odyssey culminated in the identification of a robust correlation coefficient and a statistically significant p-value, unfurling a tantalizing vista of insights for scholarly exploration.

Moreover, to fortify the integrity of our findings, control variables such as economic trends, demographic shifts, and industrial developments were meticulously factored into the analytical framework. This holistically-designed approach sought to disentangle the intricate skeins of causality, discerning the nuanced interplay between environmental stressors and occupational proclivities.

Ultimately, our methodological apparatus embraced the whimsical and the substantive alike, navigating the labyrinthine nexus of air pollution and human labor with a keen eye for rigour and a sprightly inclination for unexpected connections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hickory, North Carolina and The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8706574, r-squared of 0.7580442, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cutting Edge: A Study of the Correlation between Air Pollution in Hickory, North Carolina, and the Number of Cutters and Trimmers, Hand in North Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing relationship between air pollution in the quaint town of Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of cutters and trimmers, hand located in the state. Our diligent research team, armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, delved into this unlikely connection. Employing robust statistical analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8706574 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2022.

While the initial inquiry may seem somewhat eccentric, our findings offer compelling insights into the interplay between environmental factors and occupational trends. The presence of a high correlation between air pollution levels and the number of individuals engaged in the delicate art of hand trimming and cutting serves as a testament to the intricate dynamics of our natural and human-made environments. As we consider the implications of our results, we are reminded of the old adage, "cutting through the air pollution" may indeed have more than just a figurative meaning for the dedicated individuals shaping and trimming by hand.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The gentle rustle of leaves, the faint scent of sawdust, and the persistent hum of machinery in the distance – these are the sensory hallmarks of the town of Hickory, North Carolina. Amidst this tranquil backdrop, a curious relationship has come to light, one that intertwines the intangible presence of air pollution with the tangible hands that wield cutters and trimmers. Our foray into this seemingly whimsical correlation stems from an earnest desire to illuminate the intricate connections that underlie occupational patterns in the face of environmental challenges.
As we embark on this scholarly exploration, it is critical to acknowledge the idiosyncrasies that distinguish Hickory from its urban counterparts. The town's intimate setting amidst the enveloping beauty of nature belies a susceptibility to varying levels of air pollution, inviting contemplation of how such environmental nuances intersect with labor dynamics. Conversely, the distinctive rhythm of manual cutting and trimming, an artistry steeped in tradition, engenders a profound appreciation for the deft hands that shape our physical surroundings. It is this convergence of the ethereal and the tangible that forms the backdrop for our investigation.
Before delving into the methodology and results that underpin this study, one cannot overlook the inherent curiosity that sparks inquiry into seemingly incongruous matters. In the annals of scientific exploration, the chance alignment of two seemingly disparate phenomena often serves as the catalyst for unforeseen discoveries. With this in mind, our initial foray into the correlation between air pollution levels and the number of hand cutters and trimmers brims with the potential for uncovering uncharted terrain, both figuratively and perhaps literally.
Akin to the delicate precision of a skilled craftsman, the statistical machinations employed in this study have honed in on a correlation coefficient that elicits astonishment – 0.8706574, a figure that prompts contemplation of the intricate dance between ambient air quality and manual dexterity. Bolstering this staggering coefficient is a p-value of less than 0.01, a testament to the robustness of our findings and the salience of the interplay between environmental factors and labor dynamics.
As we traverse the pathways of this investigation, it becomes apparent that the whimsical juxtaposition of air pollution and artisanal handiwork conceals a richness of insights waiting to be unearthed. Beyond the veil of initial incredulity, the correlation we have unearthed imparts a deeper appreciation for the symbiotic relationship between the fragility of our natural surroundings and the resilience of human endeavor. Our endeavor is not merely an exercise in data crunching; it is a testament to the interwoven fabric of environmental influences and occupational proclivities.
In the unfolding pages of this report, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic interplay between the ethereal tendrils of air pollution and the palpable endeavor of hand cutters and trimmers. Our scholarly odyssey promises a journey through the subtleties of statistical significance and the whimsy of unexpected connections, shedding light on the unassuming nexus that binds the ethereal with the grounded. With our findings as companions, let us venture forth, armed with academia's equivalent of pruning shears, to trim the unruly undergrowth of misunderstanding and cultivate a deeper understanding of the curious symbiosis we have uncovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The examination of the correlation between air pollution in Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina yielded remarkable findings. For the time period spanning from 2003 to 2022, the correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.8706574, indicating a strong positive correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The r-squared value of 0.7580442 further reinforced the robustness of this association, suggesting that approximately 75.8% of the variability in the number of hand cutters and trimmers can be explained by fluctuations in air pollution levels. Furthermore, the obtained p-value of less than 0.01 underscored the statistical significance of this correlation, providing compelling evidence in support of our initial hypothesis.

As illustrated in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually encapsulates the striking correlation between air pollution levels and the number of individuals engaged in manual cutting and trimming. The data points cluster tightly along a positively sloped trendline, mirroring the cohesive relationship between these variables. The undeniable alignment of the data points serves as a visual testament to the remarkable harmony between environmental factors and labor dynamics, shedding light on the nuanced interplay that characterizes this intriguing correlation.

As we confront the implications of these findings, it becomes evident that the intricate dance between air pollution and hand cutting and trimming transcends mere statistical conjecture. The delicate interweaving of these phenomena offers profound insights into the convoluted tapestry of human activities, reminding us that even the subtlest of environmental perturbations can leave an indelible imprint on occupational trends. In light of these results, it is clear that the symphony of occupational endeavors is not insulated from the subtle whispers of our natural surroundings; rather, it is an integral part of the harmonious ensemble that constitutes our intricate ecosystem.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hickory, North Carolina and The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Cutting Edge: A Study of the Correlation between Air Pollution in Hickory, North Carolina, and the Number of Cutters and Trimmers, Hand in North Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing relationship between air pollution in the quaint town of Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of cutters and trimmers, hand located in the state. Our diligent research team, armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, delved into this unlikely connection. Employing robust statistical analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8706574 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2022.

While the initial inquiry may seem somewhat eccentric, our findings offer compelling insights into the interplay between environmental factors and occupational trends. The presence of a high correlation between air pollution levels and the number of individuals engaged in the delicate art of hand trimming and cutting serves as a testament to the intricate dynamics of our natural and human-made environments. As we consider the implications of our results, we are reminded of the old adage, "cutting through the air pollution" may indeed have more than just a figurative meaning for the dedicated individuals shaping and trimming by hand.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
This section presents a review of existing literature to contextualize the unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina.
In "Air Quality and Health" by Smith et al., the authors find a strong relationship between air pollution and respiratory health, highlighting the potential impact of environmental factors on human well-being. Furthermore, Doe's study on "Occupational Trends in North Carolina" delves into the diverse array of manual labor occupations in the state, shedding light on the nuances of specialized crafts such as hand trimming and cutting.
Expanding beyond the realm of scholarly works, pertinent non-fiction sources such as "The Air We Breathe: A Guide to Air Pollution and Its Impacts" offer comprehensive insights into the multifaceted nature of air pollution and its consequences. Similarly, "The Art of Precision: The Legacy of Hand Craftsmanship" provides a lens into the world of artisanal craftsmanship, capturing the essence of manual dexterity and meticulous attention to detail.
In a departure from traditional academic sources, the works of fiction also present curious parallels to the interplay between environmental factors and manual labor. In the novel "The Cutting Edge of Destiny," the protagonist's journey mirrors the delicate balance of navigating occupational pursuits amidst environmental challenges. Likewise, the classic "A Breath of Fresh Scissors" weaves a tale of resilience and adaptability, striking an uncanny resonance with the symbiotic relationship between air pollution and hand cutting and trimming.
Drawing inspiration from unexpected quarters, board games such as "Pollution Pandemonium" evoke a playful exploration of environmental perils, mirroring the complexities inherent in the real-world dynamics of air pollution and its impact on occupational trends. Meanwhile, "Precision Pursuit" introduces strategic maneuvering akin to the deft movements of hand cutters and trimmers, infusing an element of whimsy into our understanding of the subtle correlations at play.
In synthesizing these diverse sources, it becomes evident that our exploration transcends conventional boundaries, permeating the realms of both erudition and imagination. As we traverse the terrain of interconnected disciplines and narratives, the tapestry of our investigation takes shape, unfurling a rich mosaic of insights into the intricate relationship between air pollution and the craft of hand trimming and cutting.

[[RESULTS]]
The examination of the correlation between air pollution in Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina yielded remarkable findings. For the time period spanning from 2003 to 2022, the correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.8706574, indicating a strong positive correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The r-squared value of 0.7580442 further reinforced the robustness of this association, suggesting that approximately 75.8% of the variability in the number of hand cutters and trimmers can be explained by fluctuations in air pollution levels. Furthermore, the obtained p-value of less than 0.01 underscored the statistical significance of this correlation, providing compelling evidence in support of our initial hypothesis.
As illustrated in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually encapsulates the striking correlation between air pollution levels and the number of individuals engaged in manual cutting and trimming. The data points cluster tightly along a positively sloped trendline, mirroring the cohesive relationship between these variables. The undeniable alignment of the data points serves as a visual testament to the remarkable harmony between environmental factors and labor dynamics, shedding light on the nuanced interplay that characterizes this intriguing correlation.
As we confront the implications of these findings, it becomes evident that the intricate dance between air pollution and hand cutting and trimming transcends mere statistical conjecture. The delicate interweaving of these phenomena offers profound insights into the convoluted tapestry of human activities, reminding us that even the subtlest of environmental perturbations can leave an indelible imprint on occupational trends. In light of these results, it is clear that the symphony of occupational endeavors is not insulated from the subtle whispers of our natural surroundings; rather, it is an integral part of the harmonious ensemble that constitutes our intricate ecosystem.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The present study has unearthed a compelling correlation between air pollution levels in Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina, providing a novel insight into the interconnectedness of environmental factors and occupational trends. Our findings resonate with prior research, aligning with the work of Smith et al., which highlighted the impact of air pollution on human health. We have expanded this understanding by revealing a tangible linkage between air quality and the prevalence of hand trimming and cutting occupations.

Moreover, our results converge with Doe's exploration of occupational trends in North Carolina, which emphasized the diverse array of manual labor occupations in the state. This study offers a conceptual leap by pinpointing the specific association between air pollution and the number of individuals engaged in the delicate art of hand cutting and trimming. The unexpected parallels drawn from non-fiction and fiction sources, while initially unconventional, have furnished valuable insights into the intricate dynamics of environmental influence on labor activities.

The robust correlation coefficient and the statistically significant p-value derived from our analysis lend credence to the notion that the prevalence of hand trimming and cutting occupations is inextricably intertwined with air pollution levels. The visual representation of the data in the scatterplot further encapsulates this substantial association, providing a tangible manifestation of the harmonious interplay between environmental perturbations and occupational dynamics.

Hence, our study not only substantiates prior findings but also extends the existing knowledge by unearthing a previously unrecognized linkage between air pollution and the prevalence of hand trimming and cutting occupations. It underscores the nuanced ways in which environmental factors permeate human activities, infusing a touch of whimsy into the otherwise staid realm of occupational correlations. The implications of our results are far-reaching, emblematic of the intricate dance between environmental perturbations and the labor motifs that shape our societal fabric.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hickory, North Carolina and The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Cutting Edge: A Study of the Correlation between Air Pollution in Hickory, North Carolina, and the Number of Cutters and Trimmers, Hand in North Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing relationship between air pollution in the quaint town of Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of cutters and trimmers, hand located in the state. Our diligent research team, armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, delved into this unlikely connection. Employing robust statistical analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8706574 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2022.

While the initial inquiry may seem somewhat eccentric, our findings offer compelling insights into the interplay between environmental factors and occupational trends. The presence of a high correlation between air pollution levels and the number of individuals engaged in the delicate art of hand trimming and cutting serves as a testament to the intricate dynamics of our natural and human-made environments. As we consider the implications of our results, we are reminded of the old adage, "cutting through the air pollution" may indeed have more than just a figurative meaning for the dedicated individuals shaping and trimming by hand.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The gentle rustle of leaves, the faint scent of sawdust, and the persistent hum of machinery in the distance – these are the sensory hallmarks of the town of Hickory, North Carolina. Amidst this tranquil backdrop, a curious relationship has come to light, one that intertwines the intangible presence of air pollution with the tangible hands that wield cutters and trimmers. Our foray into this seemingly whimsical correlation stems from an earnest desire to illuminate the intricate connections that underlie occupational patterns in the face of environmental challenges.
As we embark on this scholarly exploration, it is critical to acknowledge the idiosyncrasies that distinguish Hickory from its urban counterparts. The town's intimate setting amidst the enveloping beauty of nature belies a susceptibility to varying levels of air pollution, inviting contemplation of how such environmental nuances intersect with labor dynamics. Conversely, the distinctive rhythm of manual cutting and trimming, an artistry steeped in tradition, engenders a profound appreciation for the deft hands that shape our physical surroundings. It is this convergence of the ethereal and the tangible that forms the backdrop for our investigation.
Before delving into the methodology and results that underpin this study, one cannot overlook the inherent curiosity that sparks inquiry into seemingly incongruous matters. In the annals of scientific exploration, the chance alignment of two seemingly disparate phenomena often serves as the catalyst for unforeseen discoveries. With this in mind, our initial foray into the correlation between air pollution levels and the number of hand cutters and trimmers brims with the potential for uncovering uncharted terrain, both figuratively and perhaps literally.
Akin to the delicate precision of a skilled craftsman, the statistical machinations employed in this study have honed in on a correlation coefficient that elicits astonishment – 0.8706574, a figure that prompts contemplation of the intricate dance between ambient air quality and manual dexterity. Bolstering this staggering coefficient is a p-value of less than 0.01, a testament to the robustness of our findings and the salience of the interplay between environmental factors and labor dynamics.
As we traverse the pathways of this investigation, it becomes apparent that the whimsical juxtaposition of air pollution and artisanal handiwork conceals a richness of insights waiting to be unearthed. Beyond the veil of initial incredulity, the correlation we have unearthed imparts a deeper appreciation for the symbiotic relationship between the fragility of our natural surroundings and the resilience of human endeavor. Our endeavor is not merely an exercise in data crunching; it is a testament to the interwoven fabric of environmental influences and occupational proclivities.
In the unfolding pages of this report, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic interplay between the ethereal tendrils of air pollution and the palpable endeavor of hand cutters and trimmers. Our scholarly odyssey promises a journey through the subtleties of statistical significance and the whimsy of unexpected connections, shedding light on the unassuming nexus that binds the ethereal with the grounded. With our findings as companions, let us venture forth, armed with academia's equivalent of pruning shears, to trim the unruly undergrowth of misunderstanding and cultivate a deeper understanding of the curious symbiosis we have uncovered.

[[RESULTS]]
The examination of the correlation between air pollution in Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina yielded remarkable findings. For the time period spanning from 2003 to 2022, the correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.8706574, indicating a strong positive correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The r-squared value of 0.7580442 further reinforced the robustness of this association, suggesting that approximately 75.8% of the variability in the number of hand cutters and trimmers can be explained by fluctuations in air pollution levels. Furthermore, the obtained p-value of less than 0.01 underscored the statistical significance of this correlation, providing compelling evidence in support of our initial hypothesis.
As illustrated in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually encapsulates the striking correlation between air pollution levels and the number of individuals engaged in manual cutting and trimming. The data points cluster tightly along a positively sloped trendline, mirroring the cohesive relationship between these variables. The undeniable alignment of the data points serves as a visual testament to the remarkable harmony between environmental factors and labor dynamics, shedding light on the nuanced interplay that characterizes this intriguing correlation.
As we confront the implications of these findings, it becomes evident that the intricate dance between air pollution and hand cutting and trimming transcends mere statistical conjecture. The delicate interweaving of these phenomena offers profound insights into the convoluted tapestry of human activities, reminding us that even the subtlest of environmental perturbations can leave an indelible imprint on occupational trends. In light of these results, it is clear that the symphony of occupational endeavors is not insulated from the subtle whispers of our natural surroundings; rather, it is an integral part of the harmonious ensemble that constitutes our intricate ecosystem.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the correlation between air pollution levels in Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina has yielded an enlightening tapestry of interconnectedness. The strength of the correlation coefficient, an impressive 0.8706574, showcases the robust association between these seemingly distinct spheres of influence. The R-squared value of 0.7580442 further emphasizes the substantial extent to which air pollution levels explain the variability in the number of hand cutters and trimmers, underscoring the intimate intertwining of environmental factors and occupational dynamics.

The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 acts as a resounding confirmation of the legitimacy of our findings, reminiscent of a well-honed blade effortlessly slicing through skepticism. As we contemplate the visual representation of our results in Figure 1, the tightly clustered data points along the positively sloped trendline evoke a synchrony reminiscent of an expertly executed dance, spotlighting the graceful interplay between air pollution and the art of hand cutting and trimming.

Our journey through the thicket of statistical analyses and scholarly exploration has illuminated a rich panorama of insights, challenging preconceived notions and beckoning us to ponder the profound ramifications of seemingly frivolous correlations. The symphony of statistical significance and the ballet of unexpected connections have converged to showcase an intricate web of associations, reminding us that even in the tranquil environs of Hickory, the pulsating heartbeat of industrial activity leaves an indelible imprint on the fabric of occupational pursuits.

This investigation, in all its statistical splendor and unanticipated revelations, stands as a testament to the synchronicity lurking within the inconspicuous. The unexpected harmony between air pollution and hand cutting and trimming invites us to contemplate the unseen threads that weave together the disparate elements of our environment and our endeavors.

It is with great confidence and a hint of whimsy that we assert that further research in this area is unnecessary, as the blades of insight we have wielded cut through the underbrush of inquiry with resounding clarity. Our findings invite us to embrace the unexpected correlations that whisper through the winds of statistical exploration and recognize the unfaltering rhythm of the intertwining forces that shape our occupational landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Cutting Edge: A Study of the Correlation between Air Pollution in Hickory, North Carolina, and the Number of Cutters and Trimmers, Hand in North Carolina. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Environmental Epidemiology and Occupational Health


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Cutting Edge: A Study of the Correlation between Air Pollution in Hickory, North Carolina, and the Number of Cutters and Trimmers, Hand in North Carolina. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Regional Air Quality and Occupational Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Cutting Edge: A Study of the Correlation between Air Pollution in Hickory, North Carolina, and the Number of Cutters and Trimmers, Hand in North Carolina with an abstract of This paper examines the intriguing relationship between air pollution in the quaint town of Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of cutters and trimmers, hand located in the state. Our diligent research team, armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, delved into this unlikely connection. Employing robust statistical analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8706574 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2022.
While the initial inquiry may seem somewhat eccentric, our findings offer compelling insights into the interplay between environmental factors and occupational trends. The presence of a high correlation between air pollution levels and the number of individuals engaged in the delicate art of hand trimming and cutting serves as a testament to the intricate dynamics of our natural and human-made environments. As we consider the implications of our results, we are reminded of the old adage, "cutting through the air pollution" may indeed have more than just a figurative meaning for the dedicated individuals shaping and trimming by hand.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, Hickory North Carolina, cutters, trimmers, hand, correlation, statistical analysis, environmental factors, occupational trends

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Hickory, North Carolina
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Hickory, North Carolina

The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina

Correlation r = 0.8706574 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7580442 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 75.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Hickory, North Carolina) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.0E-7. 0.0000005961455836078037000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 6.0E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,677,443 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.7, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Hickory, North Carolina (Bad air quality days)0.07984790.02641510.05970150.04722220.07945210.032786900.01923080.008219180.005479450000.00819672000000
The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina (Laborers)28702590241023302160198016101690155013801180117011001040129013401270109011201270




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
  5. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.0798479,0.0264151,0.0597015,0.0472222,0.0794521,0.0327869,0,0.0192308,0.00821918,0.00547945,0,0,0,0.00819672,0,0,0,0,0,0,])
array_2 = np.array([2870,2590,2410,2330,2160,1980,1610,1690,1550,1380,1180,1170,1100,1040,1290,1340,1270,1090,1120,1270,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Hickory, North Carolina"
array_2_name = "The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in North Carolina"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 2864 · Black Variable ID: 21546 · Red Variable ID: 12533
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0