about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,803 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and the second variable is xkcd comics published about romance.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the GMO cotton dwindled, so did the genetically modified romance in the xkcd comics. It seems like the non-GMO cotton fields just couldn't cultivate the same level of passion, leading to a defluffing of romantic storylines. It's a case of unrequited love for these xkcd comics, as they were left spinning in a punny, organic love triangle. Who knew that matters of the heart were sewn into the very fabric of agriculture? Whether it's a-maize-ing or just a cotton-picking coincidence, this link between GMO cotton in Tennessee and romantic xkcd comics is truly a budding romance novel in itself!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a cartoon-style farmer in denim overalls standing in a vast cotton field in Tennessee. The farmer is meticulously picking off pests from lush non-GMO cotton plants. In the background, a stack of xkcd comics about romance sits untouched, with colorful covers and heart symbols. The emphasis should be on the farmer's comedic frustration with the task, while surrounded by the untouched stack of romance comics. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and xkcd comics published about romance. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' a funny image macro Realistic Photorealism
ChatGPT: a funny image macro

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and xkcd comics published about romance, in the following situation: Because as the use of genetically modified cotton decreased in Tennessee, farmers were forced to spend more time and resources on pest management, leaving them with less time to read xkcd comics about romance. This led to a decrease in demand for such content, prompting the publisher to focus on other topics instead.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cotton field in Tennessee, a farmer is seen spending extra time manually picking off pests from non-GMO cotton plants. In the background, a stack of xkcd comics about romance lies untouched, as the farmer is too busy with pest management to read them.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image macro ] and depicting this scene: In a cotton field in Tennessee, a farmer is seen spending extra time manually picking off pests from non-GMO cotton plants. In the background, a stack of xkcd comics about romance lies untouched, as the farmer is too busy with pest management to read them. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a cartoon-style farmer in denim overalls standing in a vast cotton field in Tennessee. The farmer is meticulously picking off pests from lush non-GMO cotton plants. In the background, a stack of xkcd comics about romance sits untouched, with colorful covers and heart symbols. The emphasis should be on the farmer's comedic frustration with the task, while surrounded by the untouched stack of romance comics.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in cotton in Tennessee caused xkcd comics published about romance to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Cottoning On to Romance: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Tennessee Cotton and xkcd Comics

The Journal of Agricultural Genetics and Pop Culture Neuroscience

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and xkcd comics published about romance. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and AI analysis of xkcd comics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9138442 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Cottoning On to Romance: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Tennessee Cotton and xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a curious examination of the relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the publication of xkcd comics pertaining to romance. Drawing on data from the USDA and employing AI analysis techniques to scrutinize xkcd comics, our research team has uncovered a striking correlation between the two seemingly disparate domains. Lo and behold, we report a correlation coefficient of 0.9138442 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2021. As we delve into the knotty details, our findings may just spin a yarn that could unravel the fabric of conventional wisdom in agricultural and cultural spheres. So, join us as we unpick this entangled web of cotton and comics, as we stitch together an intriguing narrative that threads together these unexpected connections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and xkcd comics published about romance. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cottoning On to Romance: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Tennessee Cotton and xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a curious examination of the relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the publication of xkcd comics pertaining to romance. Drawing on data from the USDA and employing AI analysis techniques to scrutinize xkcd comics, our research team has uncovered a striking correlation between the two seemingly disparate domains. Lo and behold, we report a correlation coefficient of 0.9138442 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2021. As we delve into the knotty details, our findings may just spin a yarn that could unravel the fabric of conventional wisdom in agricultural and cultural spheres. So, join us as we unpick this entangled web of cotton and comics, as we stitch together an intriguing narrative that threads together these unexpected connections.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The modern world is a tapestry interwoven with countless threads of innovation, from genetic engineering to webcomics. In this study, we aim to unravel an unexpected connection between two seemingly disparate domains: genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the publishing of xkcd comics pertaining to romance. It's as if we've stumbled upon a twist in the fabric of reality, where GMOs and webcomics converge in an unexpected embrace.

Cotton, historically known as the "fabric of our lives," has undergone a transformation with the widespread adoption of GMOs. Meanwhile, the comic artist Randall Munroe, through his renowned xkcd series, weaves narratives akin to romantic sonnets in binary code, bridging the gap between technology and heartstrings. With these two distinct, seemingly unrelated domains in mind, our curiosity was piqued to explore any hidden stitches joining their narratives.

As we embark on this adventure, let's not rush to conclusions. Perseverance and patience are essential when untangling the yarn of data. We have gathered USDA data on cotton cultivation in Tennessee and employed advanced AI analysis to scrutinize the xkcd comic corpus. Our tools and techniques may not be as simple as threading a needle, but they have allowed us to tease out a correlation that knits these two domains closer than one might expect.

So, as we embark on this scholarly escapade, we invite you to join us in navigating the labyrinth of probability, statistics, and the unexpected. As we unravel this entangled web, our findings may just spin a yarn that leaves us in stitches or, at the very least, inspires a few cotton-picking good puns.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and xkcd comics published about romance. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cottoning On to Romance: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Tennessee Cotton and xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a curious examination of the relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the publication of xkcd comics pertaining to romance. Drawing on data from the USDA and employing AI analysis techniques to scrutinize xkcd comics, our research team has uncovered a striking correlation between the two seemingly disparate domains. Lo and behold, we report a correlation coefficient of 0.9138442 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2021. As we delve into the knotty details, our findings may just spin a yarn that could unravel the fabric of conventional wisdom in agricultural and cultural spheres. So, join us as we unpick this entangled web of cotton and comics, as we stitch together an intriguing narrative that threads together these unexpected connections.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The modern world is a tapestry interwoven with countless threads of innovation, from genetic engineering to webcomics. In this study, we aim to unravel an unexpected connection between two seemingly disparate domains: genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the publishing of xkcd comics pertaining to romance. It's as if we've stumbled upon a twist in the fabric of reality, where GMOs and webcomics converge in an unexpected embrace.
Cotton, historically known as the "fabric of our lives," has undergone a transformation with the widespread adoption of GMOs. Meanwhile, the comic artist Randall Munroe, through his renowned xkcd series, weaves narratives akin to romantic sonnets in binary code, bridging the gap between technology and heartstrings. With these two distinct, seemingly unrelated domains in mind, our curiosity was piqued to explore any hidden stitches joining their narratives.
As we embark on this adventure, let's not rush to conclusions. Perseverance and patience are essential when untangling the yarn of data. We have gathered USDA data on cotton cultivation in Tennessee and employed advanced AI analysis to scrutinize the xkcd comic corpus. Our tools and techniques may not be as simple as threading a needle, but they have allowed us to tease out a correlation that knits these two domains closer than one might expect.
So, as we embark on this scholarly escapade, we invite you to join us in navigating the labyrinth of probability, statistics, and the unexpected. As we unravel this entangled web, our findings may just spin a yarn that leaves us in stitches or, at the very least, inspires a few cotton-picking good puns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith and Doe (2015) conducted an exhaustive analysis of GMO adoption in cotton cultivation to evaluate its impact on yield and pest resistance. Their groundbreaking work shed light on the agronomic benefits and economic implications of GMO cotton in various regions. Meanwhile, Jones et al. (2018) delved into the socio-economic aspects of GMO adoption, emphasizing the complex interplay between stakeholders, policymakers, and public perception.

Turning to cultural phenomena, "Modern Romance" by Aziz Ansari (2015) offers a thought-provoking exploration of contemporary courtship in the digital age, albeit tangentially related to our focus. In a similar vein, "The Rosie Project" by Graeme Simsion (2013) provides an endearing account of love and logic, resonating with the theme of relationships that transcends technology.

Peering further into the literary landscape, we reckon with xkcd comics. Munroe's clever juxtaposition of science and humor in "xkcd: volume 0" (2010) captivates readers, intertwining mathematical musings with witty insights. As we delve deeper, we come across "Why We Love" by Helen Fisher (2004), a captivating exploration of the biochemical pathways underpinning human affection. Although seemingly unrelated at first glance, this work offers an intriguing backdrop for understanding the quirky connections between GMO cotton and xkcd comics.

In a whimsical turn of events, our literature review ventures into uncharted territories, with a fortuitous discovery in an unexpected source. The humble back of a shampoo bottle, with its sudsy aphorisms and convoluted ingredient lists, inadvertently imparts wisdom about the tangled web of human relationships. True to the adage that inspiration can be found in the most unlikely of places, we gleaned unexpected insights while lathering, rinsing, and repeating the process.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and xkcd comics published about romance. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and AI analysis of xkcd comics . You used data from 2007 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cottoning On to Romance: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Tennessee Cotton and xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a curious examination of the relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the publication of xkcd comics pertaining to romance. Drawing on data from the USDA and employing AI analysis techniques to scrutinize xkcd comics, our research team has uncovered a striking correlation between the two seemingly disparate domains. Lo and behold, we report a correlation coefficient of 0.9138442 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2021. As we delve into the knotty details, our findings may just spin a yarn that could unravel the fabric of conventional wisdom in agricultural and cultural spheres. So, join us as we unpick this entangled web of cotton and comics, as we stitch together an intriguing narrative that threads together these unexpected connections.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The modern world is a tapestry interwoven with countless threads of innovation, from genetic engineering to webcomics. In this study, we aim to unravel an unexpected connection between two seemingly disparate domains: genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the publishing of xkcd comics pertaining to romance. It's as if we've stumbled upon a twist in the fabric of reality, where GMOs and webcomics converge in an unexpected embrace.
Cotton, historically known as the "fabric of our lives," has undergone a transformation with the widespread adoption of GMOs. Meanwhile, the comic artist Randall Munroe, through his renowned xkcd series, weaves narratives akin to romantic sonnets in binary code, bridging the gap between technology and heartstrings. With these two distinct, seemingly unrelated domains in mind, our curiosity was piqued to explore any hidden stitches joining their narratives.
As we embark on this adventure, let's not rush to conclusions. Perseverance and patience are essential when untangling the yarn of data. We have gathered USDA data on cotton cultivation in Tennessee and employed advanced AI analysis to scrutinize the xkcd comic corpus. Our tools and techniques may not be as simple as threading a needle, but they have allowed us to tease out a correlation that knits these two domains closer than one might expect.
So, as we embark on this scholarly escapade, we invite you to join us in navigating the labyrinth of probability, statistics, and the unexpected. As we unravel this entangled web, our findings may just spin a yarn that leaves us in stitches or, at the very least, inspires a few cotton-picking good puns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the tangled tapestry of interconnectedness between genetically modified cotton in Tennessee and xkcd comics about romance, our research team employed a multifaceted approach that mirrored the complex interplay of strands within a spool of genetic material. Our methodology leaned heavily on the use of both quantitative and qualitative analysis techniques, akin to weaving a fabric that marries statistics with narrative insight.

Data Collection:
The first strand of our research involved the collection of data from two disparate yet complementary sources. For the cotton cultivation aspect, we turned to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for their comprehensive records on GMO adoption in cotton farming across Tennessee. To capture the essence of romance depicted in xkcd comics, we utilized an advanced form of AI analysis to thread our way through the digital library of xkcd webcomics published between 2007 and 2021. We focused our efforts on identifying comics with a discernible romantic theme, curiously noting how these themes were intricately entwined with the fabric of genetic modification.

Data Analysis:
Tugging on the threads of correlation, we subjected the collected data to a rigorous barrage of statistical analyses and machine learning algorithms. Our AI analysis of xkcd comics involved not only identifying and classifying romance-related content but also delving into the co-occurrence of specific themes and motifs within the broader narrative structure of the comics. This approach, much like untangling a particularly knotted ball of yarn, allowed us to unravel the underlying patterns in the webcomics and discern the subtle threads connecting them to the agricultural landscape of genetically modified cotton in Tennessee.

Correlation Coefficients and Probability:
With our data firmly in hand, we then turned to the loom of statistical analysis to weave together the fabric of correlation. Through meticulous calculations and application of regression models, we arrived at a correlation coefficient of 0.9138442, accompanied by a p-value smaller than 0.01, suggesting a robust association between the adoption of GMOs in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the publication of xkcd comics dedicated to matters of the heart. This finding left us in stitches, quite literally, as it seems there might be more to this relationship than meets the eye!

Limitations and Caveats:
As with any complex fabric, our study is not devoid of loose threads. While we took great care to ensure the validity and reliability of our findings, the nature of analyzing webcomics and agricultural data introduces inherent uncertainties and potential biases. Our observation of correlation does not, by any means, imply causation, and caution must be taken in interpreting the interconnectedness we've discovered.

In conclusion, our methodology wove together the warp and weft of agricultural and cultural domains, using a blend of advanced data gathering techniques and statistical analyses. We hope that our findings offer a skein of insight into the intricate fabric of our modern world, prompting further exploration into unexpected connections that lie waiting to be unraveled.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and xkcd comics published about romance. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and AI analysis of xkcd comics .

For the time period 2007 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9138442, r-squared of 0.8351112, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cottoning On to Romance: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Tennessee Cotton and xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a curious examination of the relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the publication of xkcd comics pertaining to romance. Drawing on data from the USDA and employing AI analysis techniques to scrutinize xkcd comics, our research team has uncovered a striking correlation between the two seemingly disparate domains. Lo and behold, we report a correlation coefficient of 0.9138442 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2021. As we delve into the knotty details, our findings may just spin a yarn that could unravel the fabric of conventional wisdom in agricultural and cultural spheres. So, join us as we unpick this entangled web of cotton and comics, as we stitch together an intriguing narrative that threads together these unexpected connections.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The modern world is a tapestry interwoven with countless threads of innovation, from genetic engineering to webcomics. In this study, we aim to unravel an unexpected connection between two seemingly disparate domains: genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the publishing of xkcd comics pertaining to romance. It's as if we've stumbled upon a twist in the fabric of reality, where GMOs and webcomics converge in an unexpected embrace.
Cotton, historically known as the "fabric of our lives," has undergone a transformation with the widespread adoption of GMOs. Meanwhile, the comic artist Randall Munroe, through his renowned xkcd series, weaves narratives akin to romantic sonnets in binary code, bridging the gap between technology and heartstrings. With these two distinct, seemingly unrelated domains in mind, our curiosity was piqued to explore any hidden stitches joining their narratives.
As we embark on this adventure, let's not rush to conclusions. Perseverance and patience are essential when untangling the yarn of data. We have gathered USDA data on cotton cultivation in Tennessee and employed advanced AI analysis to scrutinize the xkcd comic corpus. Our tools and techniques may not be as simple as threading a needle, but they have allowed us to tease out a correlation that knits these two domains closer than one might expect.
So, as we embark on this scholarly escapade, we invite you to join us in navigating the labyrinth of probability, statistics, and the unexpected. As we unravel this entangled web, our findings may just spin a yarn that leaves us in stitches or, at the very least, inspires a few cotton-picking good puns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data analysis revealed a remarkable correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the appearance of xkcd comics related to romance. The correlation coefficient of 0.9138442 indicates a strong positive relationship between these two variables. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8351112 highlights that approximately 83.5% of the variation in xkcd comics can be explained by changes in GMO adoption in cotton cultivation. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis and supports the existence of a significant association.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts this striking correlation, leaving little room for doubt. The points on the plot align with the precision of a tailor's hand, showcasing a near-linear relationship that may just sew together the unexpected links between cotton and comics. It's as if the data points themselves are stitches in the fabric of this scientific narrative.

These findings highlight the synergistic interplay, or dare we say, a "cottonnection," between advancements in agricultural biotechnology and cultural expressions in the digital domain. It is as though GMOs and webcomics have been entwined in a dance as intricate as the patterns on a quilt, with each innovation influencing the other in ways unforeseen.

Our results unveil a curious association that leaves us pondering the common threads that weave agricultural practices and pop cultural phenomena. It's a revelation that might just knit together a new perspective on the intricate tapestry of our modern world. As we continue to unravel the mysteries that bind these fields, we anticipate that future research may spin even more captivating insights, perhaps even weaving a captivating sequel to this unorthodox scientific investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and xkcd comics published about romance. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Cottoning On to Romance: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Tennessee Cotton and xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a curious examination of the relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the publication of xkcd comics pertaining to romance. Drawing on data from the USDA and employing AI analysis techniques to scrutinize xkcd comics, our research team has uncovered a striking correlation between the two seemingly disparate domains. Lo and behold, we report a correlation coefficient of 0.9138442 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2021. As we delve into the knotty details, our findings may just spin a yarn that could unravel the fabric of conventional wisdom in agricultural and cultural spheres. So, join us as we unpick this entangled web of cotton and comics, as we stitch together an intriguing narrative that threads together these unexpected connections.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith and Doe (2015) conducted an exhaustive analysis of GMO adoption in cotton cultivation to evaluate its impact on yield and pest resistance. Their groundbreaking work shed light on the agronomic benefits and economic implications of GMO cotton in various regions. Meanwhile, Jones et al. (2018) delved into the socio-economic aspects of GMO adoption, emphasizing the complex interplay between stakeholders, policymakers, and public perception.
Turning to cultural phenomena, "Modern Romance" by Aziz Ansari (2015) offers a thought-provoking exploration of contemporary courtship in the digital age, albeit tangentially related to our focus. In a similar vein, "The Rosie Project" by Graeme Simsion (2013) provides an endearing account of love and logic, resonating with the theme of relationships that transcends technology.
Peering further into the literary landscape, we reckon with xkcd comics. Munroe's clever juxtaposition of science and humor in "xkcd: volume 0" (2010) captivates readers, intertwining mathematical musings with witty insights. As we delve deeper, we come across "Why We Love" by Helen Fisher (2004), a captivating exploration of the biochemical pathways underpinning human affection. Although seemingly unrelated at first glance, this work offers an intriguing backdrop for understanding the quirky connections between GMO cotton and xkcd comics.
In a whimsical turn of events, our literature review ventures into uncharted territories, with a fortuitous discovery in an unexpected source. The humble back of a shampoo bottle, with its sudsy aphorisms and convoluted ingredient lists, inadvertently imparts wisdom about the tangled web of human relationships. True to the adage that inspiration can be found in the most unlikely of places, we gleaned unexpected insights while lathering, rinsing, and repeating the process.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a remarkable correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the appearance of xkcd comics related to romance. The correlation coefficient of 0.9138442 indicates a strong positive relationship between these two variables. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8351112 highlights that approximately 83.5% of the variation in xkcd comics can be explained by changes in GMO adoption in cotton cultivation. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis and supports the existence of a significant association.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts this striking correlation, leaving little room for doubt. The points on the plot align with the precision of a tailor's hand, showcasing a near-linear relationship that may just sew together the unexpected links between cotton and comics. It's as if the data points themselves are stitches in the fabric of this scientific narrative.
These findings highlight the synergistic interplay, or dare we say, a "cottonnection," between advancements in agricultural biotechnology and cultural expressions in the digital domain. It is as though GMOs and webcomics have been entwined in a dance as intricate as the patterns on a quilt, with each innovation influencing the other in ways unforeseen.
Our results unveil a curious association that leaves us pondering the common threads that weave agricultural practices and pop cultural phenomena. It's a revelation that might just knit together a new perspective on the intricate tapestry of our modern world. As we continue to unravel the mysteries that bind these fields, we anticipate that future research may spin even more captivating insights, perhaps even weaving a captivating sequel to this unorthodox scientific investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our investigation into the entangled relationship between GMO adoption in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the publication of xkcd comics pertaining to romance present a substantial contribution to the agricultural and cultural dialogue. Our results substantiate the unanticipated links between these seemingly incongruent realms, supporting the notion that the fabric of our society is interwoven with intricate connections that defy conventional categorization.

The strong correlation coefficient of 0.9138442 and p < 0.01 that we uncovered seems to suggest that the influence of GMO adoption in cotton cultivation extends beyond the agricultural landscape and integrates itself into the cultural zeitgeist represented by the publication of xkcd comics. One might even say that this correlation is as tightly knit as a pair of cotton socks, highlighting the unanticipated synergy between biotechnological advancements and artistic expression.

Harking back to our literature review, the fortuitous discovery of wisdom in an unlikely source – a shampoo bottle – now gains a renewed significance. Much like unraveling a particularly complex knitting project, the unexpected insights gleaned from this review seem to accentuate the intricate nature of the connections we have unearthed. As we teased out these unexpected relationships that surfaced in rather peculiar places, we found that the puzzle pieces began to interlock in a way that echoes the intertwining of cotton fibers.

Moreover, these results align with prior research that has delved into the intricacies of GMO adoption in cotton cultivation and the socio-cultural aspects of romantic narratives. It is as if our findings offer an unexpected plot twist in the ongoing narrative that seeks to fuse seemingly disparate domains, not unlike the unexpected plot twist in a gripping romance novel.

In essence, this investigation may just sow the seeds for future studies that seek to disentangle this intriguing web of connections and illuminate the interplay between agricultural innovations and the cultural expressions they intersect. Much like the unexpected intricacies one might find in a seemingly straightforward knitting pattern, these findings underscore the depth of the relationships that underpin our modern landscape, weaving together an unexpected tale of romance, biotechnology, and humor – a narrative as complex and captivating as the patterns on a quilt.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and xkcd comics published about romance. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Cottoning On to Romance: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Tennessee Cotton and xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a curious examination of the relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the publication of xkcd comics pertaining to romance. Drawing on data from the USDA and employing AI analysis techniques to scrutinize xkcd comics, our research team has uncovered a striking correlation between the two seemingly disparate domains. Lo and behold, we report a correlation coefficient of 0.9138442 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2021. As we delve into the knotty details, our findings may just spin a yarn that could unravel the fabric of conventional wisdom in agricultural and cultural spheres. So, join us as we unpick this entangled web of cotton and comics, as we stitch together an intriguing narrative that threads together these unexpected connections.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The modern world is a tapestry interwoven with countless threads of innovation, from genetic engineering to webcomics. In this study, we aim to unravel an unexpected connection between two seemingly disparate domains: genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the publishing of xkcd comics pertaining to romance. It's as if we've stumbled upon a twist in the fabric of reality, where GMOs and webcomics converge in an unexpected embrace.
Cotton, historically known as the "fabric of our lives," has undergone a transformation with the widespread adoption of GMOs. Meanwhile, the comic artist Randall Munroe, through his renowned xkcd series, weaves narratives akin to romantic sonnets in binary code, bridging the gap between technology and heartstrings. With these two distinct, seemingly unrelated domains in mind, our curiosity was piqued to explore any hidden stitches joining their narratives.
As we embark on this adventure, let's not rush to conclusions. Perseverance and patience are essential when untangling the yarn of data. We have gathered USDA data on cotton cultivation in Tennessee and employed advanced AI analysis to scrutinize the xkcd comic corpus. Our tools and techniques may not be as simple as threading a needle, but they have allowed us to tease out a correlation that knits these two domains closer than one might expect.
So, as we embark on this scholarly escapade, we invite you to join us in navigating the labyrinth of probability, statistics, and the unexpected. As we unravel this entangled web, our findings may just spin a yarn that leaves us in stitches or, at the very least, inspires a few cotton-picking good puns.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a remarkable correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the appearance of xkcd comics related to romance. The correlation coefficient of 0.9138442 indicates a strong positive relationship between these two variables. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8351112 highlights that approximately 83.5% of the variation in xkcd comics can be explained by changes in GMO adoption in cotton cultivation. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis and supports the existence of a significant association.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts this striking correlation, leaving little room for doubt. The points on the plot align with the precision of a tailor's hand, showcasing a near-linear relationship that may just sew together the unexpected links between cotton and comics. It's as if the data points themselves are stitches in the fabric of this scientific narrative.
These findings highlight the synergistic interplay, or dare we say, a "cottonnection," between advancements in agricultural biotechnology and cultural expressions in the digital domain. It is as though GMOs and webcomics have been entwined in a dance as intricate as the patterns on a quilt, with each innovation influencing the other in ways unforeseen.
Our results unveil a curious association that leaves us pondering the common threads that weave agricultural practices and pop cultural phenomena. It's a revelation that might just knit together a new perspective on the intricate tapestry of our modern world. As we continue to unravel the mysteries that bind these fields, we anticipate that future research may spin even more captivating insights, perhaps even weaving a captivating sequel to this unorthodox scientific investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unveiled a fascinating connection between the adoption of GMOs in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the publication of xkcd comics related to romance. The correlation coefficient of 0.9138442 and the r-squared value of 0.8351112 demonstrate an unexpectedly strong relationship between these two varied domains. It's as if these findings have spun a web of intrigue, weaving a narrative that leaves us in stitches—as well as pondering the "yarns" spun by our trendsetting data. Nevertheless, while this correlation may seem as clear as... well, the thread on a needle, we must tread carefully and avoid jumping to conclusions. After all, correlation does not always imply causation, and we must be cautious not to pull the wool over our own eyes.

Our findings, rather than tying up all loose ends, open the door to further exploration and contemplation. Yet let's not get too wrapped up in the allure of correlation. As much as we may be enticed to keep pulling at this thread, it is time to cut the cord and accept that no more research in this particular area is needed. We've truly reached the end of our tether.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Cottoning On to Romance: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Tennessee Cotton and xkcd Comics. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Genetics and Pop Culture Neuroscience


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Cottoning On to Romance: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Tennessee Cotton and xkcd Comics. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Eclectic Genetic Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Cottoning On to Romance: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Tennessee Cotton and xkcd Comics with an abstract of This paper presents a curious examination of the relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the publication of xkcd comics pertaining to romance. Drawing on data from the USDA and employing AI analysis techniques to scrutinize xkcd comics, our research team has uncovered a striking correlation between the two seemingly disparate domains. Lo and behold, we report a correlation coefficient of 0.9138442 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2021. As we delve into the knotty details, our findings may just spin a yarn that could unravel the fabric of conventional wisdom in agricultural and cultural spheres. So, join us as we unpick this entangled web of cotton and comics, as we stitch together an intriguing narrative that threads together these unexpected connections.

ChatGPT:

genetically modified cotton, cotton cultivation, Tennessee, xkcd comics, romance, USDA data, AI analysis, correlation coefficient, agricultural, cultural, conventional wisdom, GMOs, genetically modified organisms

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in Tennessee
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Tennessee that is genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Tennessee

xkcd comics published about romance
Detailed data title: The number of xkcd comics published each year about romance
Source: AI analysis of xkcd comics
Additional Info: I designed a Python workflow to perform OCR on every xkcd comic, feed that text into a large language model, and ask the model whether this comic was about the category named in the title.

See what else correlates with xkcd comics published about romance

Correlation r = 0.9138442 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8351112 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., xkcd comics published about romance) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Tennessee) over the 15 years from 2007 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.9E-6. 0.0000019139605235819290000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.00019% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 522,477 random variables You don't actually need 522 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.76, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
GMO use in cotton in Tennessee (GMO cotton %)171410866551334311
xkcd comics published about romance (xkcd comics)383521281118343231156




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([17,14,10,8,6,6,5,5,1,3,3,4,3,1,1,])
array_2 = np.array([38,35,21,28,11,18,3,4,3,2,3,1,1,5,6,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Tennessee"
array_2_name = "xkcd comics published about romance"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 2803 · Black Variable ID: 787 · Red Variable ID: 20013
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0