about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,687 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of social work teachers in Louisiana and the second variable is Kerosene used in Iraq.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of social work teachers in Louisiana increased, so did the amount of emotional support available. This led to a ripple effect of heightened positivity around the world. Eventually, this positivity found its way to Iraq, where the need for kerosene decreased due to the sudden surge in warmth and fuzziness, resulting in a surplus of kerosene.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s that depicts a classroom in Louisiana. Inside, a group of social work teachers, their numbers visibly increased, gather surrounded by books and resources, exuding empathy and warmth. Outside the window, a shipment of kerosene barrels is being loaded onto a plane, destined for Iraq, symbolizing the surplus generated by this increase in empathy. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of social work teachers in Louisiana and Kerosene used in Iraq. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Brutalism Psychedelic 3D Pixar Style Low poly A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of social work teachers in Louisiana and Kerosene used in Iraq, in the following situation: Because the increase in social work teachers in Louisiana led to a surplus of empathy, causing Louisiana to donate excess kerosene to Iraq as a humanitarian gesture.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a classroom in Louisiana, a group of social work teachers gather, their numbers visibly increased. They are surrounded by books and resources, exuding empathy and warmth. Outside the window, a shipment of kerosene barrels is being loaded onto a plane, destined for Iraq, symbolizing the surplus generated by this increase in empathy.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In a classroom in Louisiana, a group of social work teachers gather, their numbers visibly increased. They are surrounded by books and resources, exuding empathy and warmth. Outside the window, a shipment of kerosene barrels is being loaded onto a plane, destined for Iraq, symbolizing the surplus generated by this increase in empathy. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s that depicts a classroom in Louisiana. Inside, a group of social work teachers, their numbers visibly increased, gather surrounded by books and resources, exuding empathy and warmth. Outside the window, a shipment of kerosene barrels is being loaded onto a plane, destined for Iraq, symbolizing the surplus generated by this increase in empathy.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of social work teachers in Louisiana caused Kerosene used in Iraq to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Estimating the Net Work: A Statistical Examination of Social Work Teachers in Louisiana and Kerosene Consumption in Iraq

The Journal of Global Social Dynamics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of social work teachers in Louisiana and Kerosene used in Iraq. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8289093 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Estimating the Net Work: A Statistical Examination of Social Work Teachers in Louisiana and Kerosene Consumption in Iraq

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a comprehensive statistical analysis of the seemingly unrelated variables of the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and the kerosene consumption in Iraq. Our research team, utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, set out to shed light on this puzzling relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8289093 and p < 0.01, our findings point to a surprisingly strong positive association between the two variables from 2004 to 2020. We maneuver through the complexities of demographics and energy trends to connect these enigmatic dots, addressing the question that has been looming over the academic community. In elucidating this unlikely connection, we uncover deeper insights into the interplay of seemingly unrelated phenomena with a touch of statistical serendipity and a dash of academic whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of social work teachers in Louisiana and Kerosene used in Iraq. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Estimating the Net Work: A Statistical Examination of Social Work Teachers in Louisiana and Kerosene Consumption in Iraq

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a comprehensive statistical analysis of the seemingly unrelated variables of the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and the kerosene consumption in Iraq. Our research team, utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, set out to shed light on this puzzling relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8289093 and p < 0.01, our findings point to a surprisingly strong positive association between the two variables from 2004 to 2020. We maneuver through the complexities of demographics and energy trends to connect these enigmatic dots, addressing the question that has been looming over the academic community. In elucidating this unlikely connection, we uncover deeper insights into the interplay of seemingly unrelated phenomena with a touch of statistical serendipity and a dash of academic whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intricate web of statistical analysis often leads the inquisitive researcher to unexpected and, at times, downright perplexing findings. In this regard, our investigation into the correlation between the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and kerosene consumption in Iraq is a testament to the eclectic nature of statistical inquiry. At first glance, these two variables may seem as unrelated as a cat and a cactus. However, armed with an arsenal of statistical tools and a penchant for unraveling enigmatic connections, we delved into this curious relationship with a mixture of intrigue and bemusement.

The rationale behind the juxtaposition of these variables lies not in an impulse for whimsy, but rather in the pursuit of elucidating the subtle interconnectedness of societal phenomena. The notion that the employment prospects of social work teachers in a U.S. state might somehow be entangled with the consumption patterns of kerosene in a Middle Eastern nation might elicit a quizzical eyebrow raise or two. Yet, as in many statistical endeavors, hidden gems of insight often emerge from seemingly improbable pairings.

Hence, drawing from data meticulously collected from authoritative sources such as the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on this statistical adventure, armed with fervor and a splash of statistical serendipity. However, before we unveil the intriguing findings of our analysis, it is imperative to provide a brief elucidation of the theoretical background that underpins this unconventional exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of social work teachers in Louisiana and Kerosene used in Iraq. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Estimating the Net Work: A Statistical Examination of Social Work Teachers in Louisiana and Kerosene Consumption in Iraq

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a comprehensive statistical analysis of the seemingly unrelated variables of the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and the kerosene consumption in Iraq. Our research team, utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, set out to shed light on this puzzling relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8289093 and p < 0.01, our findings point to a surprisingly strong positive association between the two variables from 2004 to 2020. We maneuver through the complexities of demographics and energy trends to connect these enigmatic dots, addressing the question that has been looming over the academic community. In elucidating this unlikely connection, we uncover deeper insights into the interplay of seemingly unrelated phenomena with a touch of statistical serendipity and a dash of academic whimsy.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intricate web of statistical analysis often leads the inquisitive researcher to unexpected and, at times, downright perplexing findings. In this regard, our investigation into the correlation between the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and kerosene consumption in Iraq is a testament to the eclectic nature of statistical inquiry. At first glance, these two variables may seem as unrelated as a cat and a cactus. However, armed with an arsenal of statistical tools and a penchant for unraveling enigmatic connections, we delved into this curious relationship with a mixture of intrigue and bemusement.
The rationale behind the juxtaposition of these variables lies not in an impulse for whimsy, but rather in the pursuit of elucidating the subtle interconnectedness of societal phenomena. The notion that the employment prospects of social work teachers in a U.S. state might somehow be entangled with the consumption patterns of kerosene in a Middle Eastern nation might elicit a quizzical eyebrow raise or two. Yet, as in many statistical endeavors, hidden gems of insight often emerge from seemingly improbable pairings.
Hence, drawing from data meticulously collected from authoritative sources such as the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on this statistical adventure, armed with fervor and a splash of statistical serendipity. However, before we unveil the intriguing findings of our analysis, it is imperative to provide a brief elucidation of the theoretical background that underpins this unconventional exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The academic literature on the relationship between the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and kerosene consumption in Iraq is surprisingly sparse, as if researchers have been too perplexed by the apparent incongruity of these variables to even broach the subject. Nonetheless, within the realm of statistical inquiry, the pursuit of unexpected correlations can yield enlightening revelations, akin to finding a needle in a haystack or, perhaps more fittingly in this case, a kerosene lamp in a Louisiana swamp.

In "The Statistical Gazette," Smith et al. present a comprehensive examination of employment trends in the United States, including the variations in the number of social work teachers across different states. Though the authors stop short of linking this data to international energy consumption, their meticulous analysis paves the way for future explorations into seemingly unrelated phenomena.

Doe and Jones, in their seminal work "Quantitative Connections," delve into the intricacies of energy use patterns in the Middle East, shedding light on the factors influencing kerosene consumption in Iraq. While their focus remains centered on regional energy dynamics, their insights offer a crucial piece to our own statistical puzzle, albeit one that initially appears as incongruous as a social worker at an oil refinery.

In the realm of non-fiction literature, "The Social Work Handbook" by Lorem et al. and "The Energy Crisis in the Middle East" by Ipsum provide valuable contextual information for the variables under investigation. However, it is worth noting that "The Art of War" by Sun Tzu and "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald are not directly related to our research, despite the whispered rumors of social work strategies and excessive kerosene usage at lavish parties in West Egg.

Furthermore, the internet meme "Hide the Pain Harold" has been associated with both the challenges faced by social work teachers and the seemingly inexplicable reliance on kerosene in certain regions. While the meme's relevance to our academic inquiry may be tenuous at best, its presence in the cultural zeitgeist serves as a gentle reminder that unexpected correlations can emerge in the unlikeliest of places.

As we navigate through this literature review, it becomes increasingly evident that the seemingly disparate realms of social work education and energy consumption are not as estranged as one might assume, much like the comedic relief in a highbrow statistical discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of social work teachers in Louisiana and Kerosene used in Iraq. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2004 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Estimating the Net Work: A Statistical Examination of Social Work Teachers in Louisiana and Kerosene Consumption in Iraq

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a comprehensive statistical analysis of the seemingly unrelated variables of the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and the kerosene consumption in Iraq. Our research team, utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, set out to shed light on this puzzling relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8289093 and p < 0.01, our findings point to a surprisingly strong positive association between the two variables from 2004 to 2020. We maneuver through the complexities of demographics and energy trends to connect these enigmatic dots, addressing the question that has been looming over the academic community. In elucidating this unlikely connection, we uncover deeper insights into the interplay of seemingly unrelated phenomena with a touch of statistical serendipity and a dash of academic whimsy.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intricate web of statistical analysis often leads the inquisitive researcher to unexpected and, at times, downright perplexing findings. In this regard, our investigation into the correlation between the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and kerosene consumption in Iraq is a testament to the eclectic nature of statistical inquiry. At first glance, these two variables may seem as unrelated as a cat and a cactus. However, armed with an arsenal of statistical tools and a penchant for unraveling enigmatic connections, we delved into this curious relationship with a mixture of intrigue and bemusement.
The rationale behind the juxtaposition of these variables lies not in an impulse for whimsy, but rather in the pursuit of elucidating the subtle interconnectedness of societal phenomena. The notion that the employment prospects of social work teachers in a U.S. state might somehow be entangled with the consumption patterns of kerosene in a Middle Eastern nation might elicit a quizzical eyebrow raise or two. Yet, as in many statistical endeavors, hidden gems of insight often emerge from seemingly improbable pairings.
Hence, drawing from data meticulously collected from authoritative sources such as the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on this statistical adventure, armed with fervor and a splash of statistical serendipity. However, before we unveil the intriguing findings of our analysis, it is imperative to provide a brief elucidation of the theoretical background that underpins this unconventional exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To explicate the elusive link between the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and kerosene consumption in Iraq, our research team harnessed a concoction of methodological approaches designed to wrangle the enigmatic data hand-in-hand. The study period of 2004 to 2020 provided a temporal tapestry rich enough to capture the dynamic interplay between these seemingly disconnected variables.

To commence our statistical odyssey, we procured detailed information on the employment landscape of Louisiana’s social work sector from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This entailed sifting through vast troves of occupational data, navigating the proverbial forest of employment figures to extract the specific cohort of social work teachers. With the precision of a diamond cutter and the determination of a bloodhound, we harnessed the power of quantitative analysis to quantify the ebb and flow of this specific workforce, ensuring the integrity of our empirical foundation.

Simultaneously, our intrepid inquiry into kerosene consumption in Iraq led us to the Energy Information Administration, where we unearthed intricate details on energy consumption patterns. The data collection process involved a meticulous spelunking through the caverns of statistical reports, distilling the essence of kerosene consumption trends from the morass of energy statistics. Through this diligent spelunking, we emerged with a robust dataset that encapsulated the nuanced dynamics of kerosene usage in Iraq.

With our arsenal of data primed and polished, we employed an array of statistical analyses to disentangle the web of interconnectedness between these two disparate variables. The bivariate correlation analysis served as our compass, guiding us through the treacherous terrain of statistical analysis to unveil the strength and direction of the association. Our inferential framework, steeped in the mystique of regression analysis, bestowed upon us the power to discern the predictive potential of one variable on the other, illuminating the shadows of causality of this curious nexus.

Furthermore, employing the tool of time series analysis allowed us to traverse the temporal landscape, discerning the nuanced fluctuations and long-term trends that weave the intricate tapestry of this association. Together, these methodological forays served as the linchpin of our analytical arsenal, enabling us to anatomize the curious intersection of social work teachers in Louisiana and kerosene consumption in Iraq with a blend of rigor and statistical zest.

In addition, by virtue of this comprehensive analysis, we have been able to draw unlikely connections between distinct societal phenomena, all the while maintaining a scholarly equilibrium. At every juncture, we have leveraged our incisive intellect backed by statistical acumen to illuminate the crannies of this unconventional juxtaposition. The results of this methodological symphony are unveiled in the subsequent section, providing a comedic installment in the cryptic theatrical production of empirical exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of social work teachers in Louisiana and Kerosene used in Iraq. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2004 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8289093, r-squared of 0.6870906, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Estimating the Net Work: A Statistical Examination of Social Work Teachers in Louisiana and Kerosene Consumption in Iraq

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a comprehensive statistical analysis of the seemingly unrelated variables of the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and the kerosene consumption in Iraq. Our research team, utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, set out to shed light on this puzzling relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8289093 and p < 0.01, our findings point to a surprisingly strong positive association between the two variables from 2004 to 2020. We maneuver through the complexities of demographics and energy trends to connect these enigmatic dots, addressing the question that has been looming over the academic community. In elucidating this unlikely connection, we uncover deeper insights into the interplay of seemingly unrelated phenomena with a touch of statistical serendipity and a dash of academic whimsy.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intricate web of statistical analysis often leads the inquisitive researcher to unexpected and, at times, downright perplexing findings. In this regard, our investigation into the correlation between the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and kerosene consumption in Iraq is a testament to the eclectic nature of statistical inquiry. At first glance, these two variables may seem as unrelated as a cat and a cactus. However, armed with an arsenal of statistical tools and a penchant for unraveling enigmatic connections, we delved into this curious relationship with a mixture of intrigue and bemusement.
The rationale behind the juxtaposition of these variables lies not in an impulse for whimsy, but rather in the pursuit of elucidating the subtle interconnectedness of societal phenomena. The notion that the employment prospects of social work teachers in a U.S. state might somehow be entangled with the consumption patterns of kerosene in a Middle Eastern nation might elicit a quizzical eyebrow raise or two. Yet, as in many statistical endeavors, hidden gems of insight often emerge from seemingly improbable pairings.
Hence, drawing from data meticulously collected from authoritative sources such as the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on this statistical adventure, armed with fervor and a splash of statistical serendipity. However, before we unveil the intriguing findings of our analysis, it is imperative to provide a brief elucidation of the theoretical background that underpins this unconventional exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The correlation analysis between the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and kerosene consumption in Iraq revealed a surprisingly robust relationship. The correlation coefficient of 0.8289093, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6870906, indicates a strong positive association between these ostensibly unrelated variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the statistical significance of this unanticipated connection, reaffirming that this finding is not merely a statistical fluke.

Fig. 1 highlights the notable relationship with a scatterplot demonstrating the coherent trend in the data. The figure elegantly captures the unmistakable positive linear association between the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and kerosene consumption in Iraq. One might even say that the relationship between these variables is as clear as a sunny day in the desert, pardon the pun.

The strength of this correlation prompts a reevaluation of our perceptions regarding seemingly disparate societal elements. It urges us to approach statistical analysis with an open mind and a willingness to entertain the unexpected. After all, as George Bernard Shaw quipped, "If all the economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion."

In unraveling this peculiar correlation, we are faced with the delightful challenge of elucidating the underlying mechanisms that may underpin this unexpected association. The statistical evidence points to a connection that goes beyond mere coincidence, prompting us to delve into the multidimensional aspects of societal trends and human behavior.

In essence, the results of our analysis have unearthed a statistical conundrum that has the potential to stimulate further inquiry, challenging the boundaries of traditional statistical modeling. This unlikely pairing of variables serves as a compelling testament to the unforeseen revelations that await those who venture into the captivating realm of statistical exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of social work teachers in Louisiana and Kerosene used in Iraq. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Estimating the Net Work: A Statistical Examination of Social Work Teachers in Louisiana and Kerosene Consumption in Iraq

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a comprehensive statistical analysis of the seemingly unrelated variables of the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and the kerosene consumption in Iraq. Our research team, utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, set out to shed light on this puzzling relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8289093 and p < 0.01, our findings point to a surprisingly strong positive association between the two variables from 2004 to 2020. We maneuver through the complexities of demographics and energy trends to connect these enigmatic dots, addressing the question that has been looming over the academic community. In elucidating this unlikely connection, we uncover deeper insights into the interplay of seemingly unrelated phenomena with a touch of statistical serendipity and a dash of academic whimsy.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The academic literature on the relationship between the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and kerosene consumption in Iraq is surprisingly sparse, as if researchers have been too perplexed by the apparent incongruity of these variables to even broach the subject. Nonetheless, within the realm of statistical inquiry, the pursuit of unexpected correlations can yield enlightening revelations, akin to finding a needle in a haystack or, perhaps more fittingly in this case, a kerosene lamp in a Louisiana swamp.
In "The Statistical Gazette," Smith et al. present a comprehensive examination of employment trends in the United States, including the variations in the number of social work teachers across different states. Though the authors stop short of linking this data to international energy consumption, their meticulous analysis paves the way for future explorations into seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Doe and Jones, in their seminal work "Quantitative Connections," delve into the intricacies of energy use patterns in the Middle East, shedding light on the factors influencing kerosene consumption in Iraq. While their focus remains centered on regional energy dynamics, their insights offer a crucial piece to our own statistical puzzle, albeit one that initially appears as incongruous as a social worker at an oil refinery.
In the realm of non-fiction literature, "The Social Work Handbook" by Lorem et al. and "The Energy Crisis in the Middle East" by Ipsum provide valuable contextual information for the variables under investigation. However, it is worth noting that "The Art of War" by Sun Tzu and "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald are not directly related to our research, despite the whispered rumors of social work strategies and excessive kerosene usage at lavish parties in West Egg.
Furthermore, the internet meme "Hide the Pain Harold" has been associated with both the challenges faced by social work teachers and the seemingly inexplicable reliance on kerosene in certain regions. While the meme's relevance to our academic inquiry may be tenuous at best, its presence in the cultural zeitgeist serves as a gentle reminder that unexpected correlations can emerge in the unlikeliest of places.
As we navigate through this literature review, it becomes increasingly evident that the seemingly disparate realms of social work education and energy consumption are not as estranged as one might assume, much like the comedic relief in a highbrow statistical discourse.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis between the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and kerosene consumption in Iraq revealed a surprisingly robust relationship. The correlation coefficient of 0.8289093, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6870906, indicates a strong positive association between these ostensibly unrelated variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the statistical significance of this unanticipated connection, reaffirming that this finding is not merely a statistical fluke.
Fig. 1 highlights the notable relationship with a scatterplot demonstrating the coherent trend in the data. The figure elegantly captures the unmistakable positive linear association between the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and kerosene consumption in Iraq. One might even say that the relationship between these variables is as clear as a sunny day in the desert, pardon the pun.
The strength of this correlation prompts a reevaluation of our perceptions regarding seemingly disparate societal elements. It urges us to approach statistical analysis with an open mind and a willingness to entertain the unexpected. After all, as George Bernard Shaw quipped, "If all the economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion."
In unraveling this peculiar correlation, we are faced with the delightful challenge of elucidating the underlying mechanisms that may underpin this unexpected association. The statistical evidence points to a connection that goes beyond mere coincidence, prompting us to delve into the multidimensional aspects of societal trends and human behavior.
In essence, the results of our analysis have unearthed a statistical conundrum that has the potential to stimulate further inquiry, challenging the boundaries of traditional statistical modeling. This unlikely pairing of variables serves as a compelling testament to the unforeseen revelations that await those who venture into the captivating realm of statistical exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our analysis have brought to light a compelling and, dare we say, illuminating relationship between the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and kerosene consumption in Iraq. Despite the initial incredulity that may accompany such an unexpected correlation, our findings align with prior research in intriguing ways.

In our literature review, we amusingly touched upon the whispered rumors of social work strategies and excessive kerosene usage at lavish parties in West Egg. Although seemingly whimsical, these references allude to the pervasive influence of societal and cultural factors on the variables under scrutiny. This jest ignites contemplation on the role of social norms and economic dynamics in shaping the intricate tapestry of statistical associations. As such, our results substantiate the notion that unexpected correlations can indeed emerge from the depths of statistical inquiry, much like unearthing a hidden treasure amidst a sea of data.

Drawing from the works of Smith et al. and Doe and Jones, who approached the realms of social work education and energy consumption from different vantage points, we find an unanticipated synergy between their respective areas of study. While their analyses were not explicitly geared towards linking the two variables of interest, the depth of their insights lays the groundwork for our fortuitous discovery. This underscores the interconnectedness of diverse fields of research and evokes an appreciative nod to the unpredictability of statistical exploration.

Moreover, the presence of the internet meme "Hide the Pain Harold" hints at the interplay of humor and serious inquiry, serving as a whimsical reminder that statistical analysis need not be devoid of levity. This underlines the multifaceted nature of scholarly discourse and the potential for unexpected sources of inspiration to spark novel perspectives. Indeed, statistical serendipity has a whimsical allure, akin to stumbling upon a lighthearted pun in an otherwise weighty tome.

In conclusion, our findings bolster the growing realization that statistical inquiry is not devoid of surprises, and that amidst the sea of data, unexpected correlations can lead to profound revelations. This statistical oddity encourages us to embrace the delightful unpredictability of empirical exploration and underscores the value of approaching research with an open mind and a sense of statistical whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of social work teachers in Louisiana and Kerosene used in Iraq. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Estimating the Net Work: A Statistical Examination of Social Work Teachers in Louisiana and Kerosene Consumption in Iraq

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a comprehensive statistical analysis of the seemingly unrelated variables of the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and the kerosene consumption in Iraq. Our research team, utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, set out to shed light on this puzzling relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8289093 and p < 0.01, our findings point to a surprisingly strong positive association between the two variables from 2004 to 2020. We maneuver through the complexities of demographics and energy trends to connect these enigmatic dots, addressing the question that has been looming over the academic community. In elucidating this unlikely connection, we uncover deeper insights into the interplay of seemingly unrelated phenomena with a touch of statistical serendipity and a dash of academic whimsy.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intricate web of statistical analysis often leads the inquisitive researcher to unexpected and, at times, downright perplexing findings. In this regard, our investigation into the correlation between the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and kerosene consumption in Iraq is a testament to the eclectic nature of statistical inquiry. At first glance, these two variables may seem as unrelated as a cat and a cactus. However, armed with an arsenal of statistical tools and a penchant for unraveling enigmatic connections, we delved into this curious relationship with a mixture of intrigue and bemusement.
The rationale behind the juxtaposition of these variables lies not in an impulse for whimsy, but rather in the pursuit of elucidating the subtle interconnectedness of societal phenomena. The notion that the employment prospects of social work teachers in a U.S. state might somehow be entangled with the consumption patterns of kerosene in a Middle Eastern nation might elicit a quizzical eyebrow raise or two. Yet, as in many statistical endeavors, hidden gems of insight often emerge from seemingly improbable pairings.
Hence, drawing from data meticulously collected from authoritative sources such as the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on this statistical adventure, armed with fervor and a splash of statistical serendipity. However, before we unveil the intriguing findings of our analysis, it is imperative to provide a brief elucidation of the theoretical background that underpins this unconventional exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis between the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and kerosene consumption in Iraq revealed a surprisingly robust relationship. The correlation coefficient of 0.8289093, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6870906, indicates a strong positive association between these ostensibly unrelated variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the statistical significance of this unanticipated connection, reaffirming that this finding is not merely a statistical fluke.
Fig. 1 highlights the notable relationship with a scatterplot demonstrating the coherent trend in the data. The figure elegantly captures the unmistakable positive linear association between the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and kerosene consumption in Iraq. One might even say that the relationship between these variables is as clear as a sunny day in the desert, pardon the pun.
The strength of this correlation prompts a reevaluation of our perceptions regarding seemingly disparate societal elements. It urges us to approach statistical analysis with an open mind and a willingness to entertain the unexpected. After all, as George Bernard Shaw quipped, "If all the economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion."
In unraveling this peculiar correlation, we are faced with the delightful challenge of elucidating the underlying mechanisms that may underpin this unexpected association. The statistical evidence points to a connection that goes beyond mere coincidence, prompting us to delve into the multidimensional aspects of societal trends and human behavior.
In essence, the results of our analysis have unearthed a statistical conundrum that has the potential to stimulate further inquiry, challenging the boundaries of traditional statistical modeling. This unlikely pairing of variables serves as a compelling testament to the unforeseen revelations that await those who venture into the captivating realm of statistical exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the perplexing relationship between the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and kerosene consumption in Iraq has yielded captivating insights that bridge seemingly unrelated societal phenomena. The correlation coefficient of 0.8289093, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the robustness and statistical significance of this unexpected linkage. Much like uncovering a hidden treasure in the labyrinth of statistical analysis, our findings invite further contemplation and scholarly amusement.

The implications of this curious association extend beyond the confines of statistical curiosity, prompting us to reconsider the conventional boundaries of societal interconnectedness. As we tread through the terra incognita of statistical inquiry, we are reminded of the words of Albert Einstein, who astutely remarked, "The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science."

Alas, as we draw the curtains on this statistical escapade, it is with good humor and a touch of intellectual whimsy that we assert the closure of this chapter of inquiry. For, as Mark Twain jested, "To a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail." We are wary of falling into the trap of overanalyzing frivolous connections and, therefore, advocate that no further research in this peculiar intersection of variables is warranted. After all, one must not try to connect too many dots, lest the picture becomes a convoluted mess.

Our exploration into this statistical oddity serves as a testament to the beguiling nature of statistical serendipity and the delightfully unexpected relationships that lie dormant within the labyrinth of data. As we bid adieu to this unlikely pairing, we anticipate that future statistical endeavors will continue to uncover the hidden treasures of association and correlation, sprinkled with a hint of whimsy and a dash of delight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Estimating the Net Work: A Statistical Examination of Social Work Teachers in Louisiana and Kerosene Consumption in Iraq. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Global Social Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Estimating the Net Work: A Statistical Examination of Social Work Teachers in Louisiana and Kerosene Consumption in Iraq. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Comparative Social Welfare and Energy Consumption Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Estimating the Net Work: A Statistical Examination of Social Work Teachers in Louisiana and Kerosene Consumption in Iraq with an abstract of In this paper, we present a comprehensive statistical analysis of the seemingly unrelated variables of the number of social work teachers in Louisiana and the kerosene consumption in Iraq. Our research team, utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, set out to shed light on this puzzling relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8289093 and p < 0.01, our findings point to a surprisingly strong positive association between the two variables from 2004 to 2020. We maneuver through the complexities of demographics and energy trends to connect these enigmatic dots, addressing the question that has been looming over the academic community. In elucidating this unlikely connection, we uncover deeper insights into the interplay of seemingly unrelated phenomena with a touch of statistical serendipity and a dash of academic whimsy.

ChatGPT:

social work teachers Louisiana, kerosene consumption Iraq, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, energy trends, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Energy Information Administration, demographics, social work education, fuel consumption, interdisciplinary analysis, academia

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of social work teachers in Louisiana
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of social work teachers, postsecondary in Louisiana
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of social work teachers in Louisiana

Kerosene used in Iraq
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Iraq in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Iraq

Correlation r = 0.8289093 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6870906 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Kerosene used in Iraq) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of social work teachers in Louisiana) over the 17 years from 2004 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.9E-5. 0.0000391541549862635400000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.0039% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 25,540 random variables You don't actually need 25 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.58, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
The number of social work teachers in Louisiana (Laborers)301109090120100120110120130606050801009070
Kerosene used in Iraq (Million Barrels/Day)29.69532.254235.092135.939237.446139.92074144454228262735.044136.065237.955433.784




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([30,110,90,90,120,100,120,110,120,130,60,60,50,80,100,90,70,])
array_2 = np.array([29.695,32.2542,35.0921,35.9392,37.4461,39.9207,41,44,45,42,28,26,27,35.0441,36.0652,37.9554,33.784,])
array_1_name = "The number of social work teachers in Louisiana"
array_2_name = "Kerosene used in Iraq"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 2687 · Black Variable ID: 17089 · Red Variable ID: 24552
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0