about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,543 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and the second variable is Kroger's stock price (KR).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As people drank more bottled water, they became better hydrated and therefore more productive. This led to overall economic growth, increasing the demand for grocery products, including those sold at Kroger. Additionally, the influx of empty water bottles provided a new source of recyclable materials, leading to cost savings for the company. Remember, the correlation does not imply causation!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image where a hyper-realistic person, glowing with health, walks through the sunshine towards a Kroger store. The person, with clear signs of hydration, confidently holds a glistening bottle of water. The bottle catches the light, showcasing its pure contents. The person's enlivened expression communicates the positive effects of proper hydration. In the background, a stock price ticker for Kroger (KR) displays a noticeable uptick, directly linking increased water consumption to the rise in the company's stock price. The entire scene should be full of vibrant, realistic details, bringing each element to life. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Kroger's stock price (KR). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Scalar art Macabre Celtic art Cubism Hyper-realistic
ChatGPT: Hyper-realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Kroger's stock price (KR), in the following situation: The increased water consumption led to more hydration which in turn led to more people having the energy to shop at Kroger, thus boosting their stock price. It's a trickle-down effect, you could say.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, we see a person carrying a bottle of water while walking into a Kroger store. The sunshine illuminates the clear bottle of water, symbolizing increased water consumption. The person's energized expression shows the effects of hydration, and in the background, the stock price ticker for Kroger (KR) is displayed, indicating a rise in the company's stock price. This illustrates the direct link between increased water consumption and the rise in Kroger's stock price.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Hyper-realistic ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, we see a person carrying a bottle of water while walking into a Kroger store. The sunshine illuminates the clear bottle of water, symbolizing increased water consumption. The person's energized expression shows the effects of hydration, and in the background, the stock price ticker for Kroger (KR) is displayed, indicating a rise in the company's stock price. This illustrates the direct link between increased water consumption and the rise in Kroger's stock price. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image where a hyper-realistic person, glowing with health, walks through the sunshine towards a Kroger store. The person, with clear signs of hydration, confidently holds a glistening bottle of water. The bottle catches the light, showcasing its pure contents. The person's enlivened expression communicates the positive effects of proper hydration. In the background, a stock price ticker for Kroger (KR) displays a noticeable uptick, directly linking increased water consumption to the rise in the company's stock price. The entire scene should be full of vibrant, realistic details, bringing each element to life.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in US Bottled Water Consumption per Person caused Kroger's stock price (KR) to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Quench for Financial Success: A Thirsty Analysis of US Bottled Water Consumption and Kroger's Stock Price

The Journal of Thirstonomics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Kroger's stock price (KR). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8829960 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Quench for Financial Success: A Thirsty Analysis of US Bottled Water Consumption and Kroger's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we dive into the quenching world of US bottled water consumption and its surprising correlation with the stock price of Kroger (KR). Utilizing data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning two decades, from 2002 to 2022. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8829960 and p < 0.01 between US bottled water consumption per person and the fluctuation of Kroger's stock price. This unexpected link has left us pondering, "Are investors making a splash with their stock decisions, or is there something bubbling beneath the surface?" Our research aims to quench the curiosity of both financial analysts and water enthusiasts alike. We hope this paper makes a wave in the academic world while leaving readers both informed and refreshed.

*Do you know why we should never tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears!*


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Kroger's stock price (KR). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Quench for Financial Success: A Thirsty Analysis of US Bottled Water Consumption and Kroger's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we dive into the quenching world of US bottled water consumption and its surprising correlation with the stock price of Kroger (KR). Utilizing data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning two decades, from 2002 to 2022. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8829960 and p < 0.01 between US bottled water consumption per person and the fluctuation of Kroger's stock price. This unexpected link has left us pondering, "Are investors making a splash with their stock decisions, or is there something bubbling beneath the surface?" Our research aims to quench the curiosity of both financial analysts and water enthusiasts alike. We hope this paper makes a wave in the academic world while leaving readers both informed and refreshed.

*Do you know why we should never tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears!*

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Amidst the hustle and bustle of the financial world, there exists an unexpected correlation that has bubbled to the surface - the relationship between US bottled water consumption and the stock price of Kroger (KR). As the saying goes, "Water you thinking?" One might be tempted to ask, "What's the pourpose of studying such a connection?" Well, fear not, for we are here to quench that curiosity.

The significance of water consumption in the United States cannot be overestimated. The country has witnessed a shift in consumer preferences toward convenient, on-the-go hydration options. In fact, per capita consumption of bottled water has been on the rise, leading us to ponder whether this trend is merely a drop in the ocean or a ripple effect that extends to the stock market. It's like the stock market is saying, "Let's make some waves," while the water industry is exclaiming, "We're on a liquid diet!"

Meanwhile, Kroger, one of the largest supermarket chains in the United States, stands as a relevant entity in this study, as its performance is heavily influenced by consumer trends and behaviors. One might even say that Kroger's stock price is taking the plunge every time there's a surge in water consumption. It's like retail and hydration have become partners in a intricate dance, with the stock market saying, "I'm just trying to stay afloat," and water consumption replying, "I'm here to make a splash!"

This leads us to our research question: "Is there more to this correlation than meets the eye, or are we simply skimming the surface?" In the words of a wise investor, "I'm not watering down my portfolio with these stocks, I just have a thirst for financial success!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Kroger's stock price (KR). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Quench for Financial Success: A Thirsty Analysis of US Bottled Water Consumption and Kroger's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we dive into the quenching world of US bottled water consumption and its surprising correlation with the stock price of Kroger (KR). Utilizing data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning two decades, from 2002 to 2022. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8829960 and p < 0.01 between US bottled water consumption per person and the fluctuation of Kroger's stock price. This unexpected link has left us pondering, "Are investors making a splash with their stock decisions, or is there something bubbling beneath the surface?" Our research aims to quench the curiosity of both financial analysts and water enthusiasts alike. We hope this paper makes a wave in the academic world while leaving readers both informed and refreshed.

*Do you know why we should never tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears!*

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Amidst the hustle and bustle of the financial world, there exists an unexpected correlation that has bubbled to the surface - the relationship between US bottled water consumption and the stock price of Kroger (KR). As the saying goes, "Water you thinking?" One might be tempted to ask, "What's the pourpose of studying such a connection?" Well, fear not, for we are here to quench that curiosity.
The significance of water consumption in the United States cannot be overestimated. The country has witnessed a shift in consumer preferences toward convenient, on-the-go hydration options. In fact, per capita consumption of bottled water has been on the rise, leading us to ponder whether this trend is merely a drop in the ocean or a ripple effect that extends to the stock market. It's like the stock market is saying, "Let's make some waves," while the water industry is exclaiming, "We're on a liquid diet!"
Meanwhile, Kroger, one of the largest supermarket chains in the United States, stands as a relevant entity in this study, as its performance is heavily influenced by consumer trends and behaviors. One might even say that Kroger's stock price is taking the plunge every time there's a surge in water consumption. It's like retail and hydration have become partners in a intricate dance, with the stock market saying, "I'm just trying to stay afloat," and water consumption replying, "I'm here to make a splash!"
This leads us to our research question: "Is there more to this correlation than meets the eye, or are we simply skimming the surface?" In the words of a wise investor, "I'm not watering down my portfolio with these stocks, I just have a thirst for financial success!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith and Doe (2017) examined the fluctuations in US bottled water consumption and its potential impact on various industries. They discovered a positive correlation between increased bottled water consumption and the performance of retail and beverage sectors, but their analysis stopped short of delving into specific stock market effects. It's like they dipped their toes in the water but didn't want to make a splash.

In a similar vein, Jones (2020) conducted a comprehensive analysis of stock prices of major supermarket chains, including Kroger, and identified several market influencers. However, the study overlooked the potential influence of consumer behavior, such as bottled water consumption, on stock performance. It's as though they looked at the stock market through a filter, but the water was still murky.

Moving on to more lighthearted literature, "Thirst: A Brief History of BAI Consumption" by Keller (2019) sheds light on the cultural and societal shifts surrounding bottled water consumption. This book provides a refreshing perspective on the social significance of staying hydrated while investing in stocks. It's like a bottle of knowledge with a twist of lemon – both informative and refreshing.

A fictional book, "The Water Witch" by Scott (2015), although not directly related to financial matters or retail, presents a fantastical world where water holds mysterious powers. One might humorously speculate that perhaps Kroger's stock price is influenced by mystical water forces beyond our comprehension. Maybe they have a magician in their accounting department who can make profits disappear.

Drawing unexpected inspiration from the world of board games, "WaterWorks: Shareholder Showdown" by Aqua Games Inc. (2012) playfully imagines a scenario where players invest in bottled water companies while competing to control the stock market. The game's tagline, "Make a splash with your stock portfolio," reflects the surprising connection we are investigating. It's as if financial success and water are playing a game of tug-of-war, with investors exclaiming, "I'm all in!" and water enthusiasts declaring, "I'm riding the wave!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Kroger's stock price (KR). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Quench for Financial Success: A Thirsty Analysis of US Bottled Water Consumption and Kroger's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we dive into the quenching world of US bottled water consumption and its surprising correlation with the stock price of Kroger (KR). Utilizing data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning two decades, from 2002 to 2022. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8829960 and p < 0.01 between US bottled water consumption per person and the fluctuation of Kroger's stock price. This unexpected link has left us pondering, "Are investors making a splash with their stock decisions, or is there something bubbling beneath the surface?" Our research aims to quench the curiosity of both financial analysts and water enthusiasts alike. We hope this paper makes a wave in the academic world while leaving readers both informed and refreshed.

*Do you know why we should never tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears!*

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Amidst the hustle and bustle of the financial world, there exists an unexpected correlation that has bubbled to the surface - the relationship between US bottled water consumption and the stock price of Kroger (KR). As the saying goes, "Water you thinking?" One might be tempted to ask, "What's the pourpose of studying such a connection?" Well, fear not, for we are here to quench that curiosity.
The significance of water consumption in the United States cannot be overestimated. The country has witnessed a shift in consumer preferences toward convenient, on-the-go hydration options. In fact, per capita consumption of bottled water has been on the rise, leading us to ponder whether this trend is merely a drop in the ocean or a ripple effect that extends to the stock market. It's like the stock market is saying, "Let's make some waves," while the water industry is exclaiming, "We're on a liquid diet!"
Meanwhile, Kroger, one of the largest supermarket chains in the United States, stands as a relevant entity in this study, as its performance is heavily influenced by consumer trends and behaviors. One might even say that Kroger's stock price is taking the plunge every time there's a surge in water consumption. It's like retail and hydration have become partners in a intricate dance, with the stock market saying, "I'm just trying to stay afloat," and water consumption replying, "I'm here to make a splash!"
This leads us to our research question: "Is there more to this correlation than meets the eye, or are we simply skimming the surface?" In the words of a wise investor, "I'm not watering down my portfolio with these stocks, I just have a thirst for financial success!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To quench our thirst for knowledge, our research employed a comprehensive and innovative methodology to explore the intriguing link between US bottled water consumption and Kroger's stock price. We didn't just want to make a splash in the academic world; we aimed to dive deep into the data. Our data collection involved various elaborate means, including consulting the Oracle of Data (aka Statista) and navigating the labyrinth of financial information provided by LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). It was like trying to locate the fabled Fountain of Financial Truth amidst a sea of statistical noise and market fluctuations.

To ensure the integrity and depth of our analysis, we utilized a time series approach, transforming data from 2002 to 2022 into a liquid narrative that could reveal the ebbs and flows of both bottled water consumption and Kroger's stock price. We conducted a thorough statistical analysis, leveraging the power of correlation coefficients and regression models to discern any patterns in the data. Our statistical tools were like the lifebuoys in the stormy seas of financial data; they kept us afloat, allowing us to navigate the choppy waters of correlation.

In addition to statistical analyses, we employed a multidisciplinary approach that combined elements of market sentiment analysis and consumer behavior studies. We wanted to delve beyond the mere numbers and explore the psychological and emotional undercurrents that might be driving the observed correlation. It was like trying to read the ripples on a tranquil pond, seeking out the hidden undercurrents of consumer sentiment and stock market behavior.

To complement our quantitative methods, we conducted qualitative interviews with industry experts and financial analysts. These interviews provided us with valuable insights, akin to catching droplets of wisdom in the torrential downpour of financial speculation and consumer trends.

Finally, to add an element of unpredictability and excitement to our research, we conducted a controlled experiment involving a blind taste test of various bottled water brands among a sample of stock market analysts. This unconventional approach provided us with a rather refreshing perspective, one that allowed us to glimpse the intersection of sensory experience and financial decision-making. It was as if we were saying, "Let's add a dash of surprise to this otherwise predictable study."

In conclusion, our methodology was a fusion of traditional statistical analyses, psychological insights, and a sprinkle of unconventional experimentation. It's like we were trying to mix different flavors of research methods to create a refreshing blend that both invigorates and informs. With this approach, we hope to quench the academic community's thirst for knowledge and leave a lasting impression, much like the first gulp of water on a scorching summer day.

Let's just say our methodology was as refreshing as a glass of cold water on a hot day – it hit the spot!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Kroger's stock price (KR). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8829960, r-squared of 0.7796819, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Quench for Financial Success: A Thirsty Analysis of US Bottled Water Consumption and Kroger's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we dive into the quenching world of US bottled water consumption and its surprising correlation with the stock price of Kroger (KR). Utilizing data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning two decades, from 2002 to 2022. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8829960 and p < 0.01 between US bottled water consumption per person and the fluctuation of Kroger's stock price. This unexpected link has left us pondering, "Are investors making a splash with their stock decisions, or is there something bubbling beneath the surface?" Our research aims to quench the curiosity of both financial analysts and water enthusiasts alike. We hope this paper makes a wave in the academic world while leaving readers both informed and refreshed.

*Do you know why we should never tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears!*

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Amidst the hustle and bustle of the financial world, there exists an unexpected correlation that has bubbled to the surface - the relationship between US bottled water consumption and the stock price of Kroger (KR). As the saying goes, "Water you thinking?" One might be tempted to ask, "What's the pourpose of studying such a connection?" Well, fear not, for we are here to quench that curiosity.
The significance of water consumption in the United States cannot be overestimated. The country has witnessed a shift in consumer preferences toward convenient, on-the-go hydration options. In fact, per capita consumption of bottled water has been on the rise, leading us to ponder whether this trend is merely a drop in the ocean or a ripple effect that extends to the stock market. It's like the stock market is saying, "Let's make some waves," while the water industry is exclaiming, "We're on a liquid diet!"
Meanwhile, Kroger, one of the largest supermarket chains in the United States, stands as a relevant entity in this study, as its performance is heavily influenced by consumer trends and behaviors. One might even say that Kroger's stock price is taking the plunge every time there's a surge in water consumption. It's like retail and hydration have become partners in a intricate dance, with the stock market saying, "I'm just trying to stay afloat," and water consumption replying, "I'm here to make a splash!"
This leads us to our research question: "Is there more to this correlation than meets the eye, or are we simply skimming the surface?" In the words of a wise investor, "I'm not watering down my portfolio with these stocks, I just have a thirst for financial success!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

After analyzing the data collected from 2002 to 2022, a remarkably strong positive correlation was observed between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Kroger (KR). The correlation coefficient of 0.8829960 indicates a robust relationship between these two variables, and the r-squared value of 0.7796819 suggests that approximately 78% of the variation in Kroger's stock price can be explained by changes in US bottled water consumption per person. Furthermore, the p-value being less than 0.01 demonstrates that this correlation is highly statistically significant.

Figure 1 illustrates the strong relationship between US bottled water consumption per person and Kroger's stock price. The scatterplot depicts a clear pattern, resembling the waves of the stock market mirroring the ebb and flow of water consumption. It's like the stock market is crying out, "Water we waiting for? Let's ride this wave to success!"

The results of this study provide compelling evidence of the unexpected connection between US bottled water consumption and Kroger's stock price. These findings raise thought-provoking questions about the influence of consumer behavior on the financial performance of retail companies. It's as if the stock market is saying, "Take stock of your hydration, and watch the market flow," while the bottles of water chime in, "We're not just refreshing, we're financially uplifting!"

The strong correlation uncovered in this research highlights the potential impact of consumer trends on the stock market, emphasizing the need to consider diverse and unconventional factors when analyzing stock performance. This unexpected relationship between bottled water consumption and stock prices urges us to delve deeper and explore what other surprising connections may exist in the financial world. It's like the market is full of mysteries, and we're here to solve them with a splash of humor and a drop of insight.

*Why couldn't the bicycle stand up by itself? Because it was two-tired!*


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Kroger's stock price (KR). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Quench for Financial Success: A Thirsty Analysis of US Bottled Water Consumption and Kroger's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we dive into the quenching world of US bottled water consumption and its surprising correlation with the stock price of Kroger (KR). Utilizing data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning two decades, from 2002 to 2022. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8829960 and p < 0.01 between US bottled water consumption per person and the fluctuation of Kroger's stock price. This unexpected link has left us pondering, "Are investors making a splash with their stock decisions, or is there something bubbling beneath the surface?" Our research aims to quench the curiosity of both financial analysts and water enthusiasts alike. We hope this paper makes a wave in the academic world while leaving readers both informed and refreshed.

*Do you know why we should never tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears!*

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith and Doe (2017) examined the fluctuations in US bottled water consumption and its potential impact on various industries. They discovered a positive correlation between increased bottled water consumption and the performance of retail and beverage sectors, but their analysis stopped short of delving into specific stock market effects. It's like they dipped their toes in the water but didn't want to make a splash.
In a similar vein, Jones (2020) conducted a comprehensive analysis of stock prices of major supermarket chains, including Kroger, and identified several market influencers. However, the study overlooked the potential influence of consumer behavior, such as bottled water consumption, on stock performance. It's as though they looked at the stock market through a filter, but the water was still murky.
Moving on to more lighthearted literature, "Thirst: A Brief History of BAI Consumption" by Keller (2019) sheds light on the cultural and societal shifts surrounding bottled water consumption. This book provides a refreshing perspective on the social significance of staying hydrated while investing in stocks. It's like a bottle of knowledge with a twist of lemon – both informative and refreshing.
A fictional book, "The Water Witch" by Scott (2015), although not directly related to financial matters or retail, presents a fantastical world where water holds mysterious powers. One might humorously speculate that perhaps Kroger's stock price is influenced by mystical water forces beyond our comprehension. Maybe they have a magician in their accounting department who can make profits disappear.
Drawing unexpected inspiration from the world of board games, "WaterWorks: Shareholder Showdown" by Aqua Games Inc. (2012) playfully imagines a scenario where players invest in bottled water companies while competing to control the stock market. The game's tagline, "Make a splash with your stock portfolio," reflects the surprising connection we are investigating. It's as if financial success and water are playing a game of tug-of-war, with investors exclaiming, "I'm all in!" and water enthusiasts declaring, "I'm riding the wave!"

[[RESULTS]]
After analyzing the data collected from 2002 to 2022, a remarkably strong positive correlation was observed between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Kroger (KR). The correlation coefficient of 0.8829960 indicates a robust relationship between these two variables, and the r-squared value of 0.7796819 suggests that approximately 78% of the variation in Kroger's stock price can be explained by changes in US bottled water consumption per person. Furthermore, the p-value being less than 0.01 demonstrates that this correlation is highly statistically significant.
Figure 1 illustrates the strong relationship between US bottled water consumption per person and Kroger's stock price. The scatterplot depicts a clear pattern, resembling the waves of the stock market mirroring the ebb and flow of water consumption. It's like the stock market is crying out, "Water we waiting for? Let's ride this wave to success!"
The results of this study provide compelling evidence of the unexpected connection between US bottled water consumption and Kroger's stock price. These findings raise thought-provoking questions about the influence of consumer behavior on the financial performance of retail companies. It's as if the stock market is saying, "Take stock of your hydration, and watch the market flow," while the bottles of water chime in, "We're not just refreshing, we're financially uplifting!"
The strong correlation uncovered in this research highlights the potential impact of consumer trends on the stock market, emphasizing the need to consider diverse and unconventional factors when analyzing stock performance. This unexpected relationship between bottled water consumption and stock prices urges us to delve deeper and explore what other surprising connections may exist in the financial world. It's like the market is full of mysteries, and we're here to solve them with a splash of humor and a drop of insight.
*Why couldn't the bicycle stand up by itself? Because it was two-tired!*

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Building on the literature review, our findings not only confirm but also substantially advance the understanding of the unexpected relationship between US bottled water consumption and Kroger's stock price. Smith and Doe (2017) hinted at the potential influence of bottled water consumption on retail performance, and our research dives deeper into the financial realm, showing a remarkably strong positive correlation. It's like we turned a small ripple in the data into a tidal wave of insight.

Similarly, drawing inspiration from the lighthearted literature, "WaterWorks: Shareholder Showdown" by Aqua Games Inc. (2012) may not have been meant as a serious academic contribution, but our results elevate this playful game's tagline, "Make a splash with your stock portfolio," to a prophetic statement. It's as if the game developers had an inside scoop on our findings. Who would've thunk that the financial success of a supermarket chain could be tied to a product as simple as bottled water?

Furthermore, the unexpected whimsy derived from "The Water Witch" by Scott (2015) takes on a whole new dimension as our research hints at a mystical force steering Kroger's stock price. Perhaps there's a water wizard behind those boardroom doors with a secret recipe for financial success, blending water and stocks like a well-crafted potion. Or maybe it's just a quirk of consumer behavior, but either way, the statistically significant correlation speaks for itself.

These results not only bridge the gap between two seemingly incongruent entities, water consumption, and stock price but also extend an invitation to think outside the box when dissecting the complexities of the financial market. It's as if the market is urging both investors and analysts to drink deeply from the well of unconventional wisdom, realizing that sometimes, the most unexpected correlations can hold the key to untold riches.

In conclusion, our research stands as a testament to the dynamic nature of the financial world and the surprising interplay between consumer behavior and stock market performance. Our empirical evidence substantiates the previously overlooked influences, leaving one to wonder what other unexpected connections may lie beneath the surface, waiting to be unearthed. It's like the market is a treasure map, and we just found the 'X' that says, "Bottled Water = Kroger's Stock Price." And who said academic research can't be a thirst quencher for knowledge?
*Did you hear about the Italian chef who died? He pasta way.*


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Kroger's stock price (KR). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Quench for Financial Success: A Thirsty Analysis of US Bottled Water Consumption and Kroger's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we dive into the quenching world of US bottled water consumption and its surprising correlation with the stock price of Kroger (KR). Utilizing data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning two decades, from 2002 to 2022. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8829960 and p < 0.01 between US bottled water consumption per person and the fluctuation of Kroger's stock price. This unexpected link has left us pondering, "Are investors making a splash with their stock decisions, or is there something bubbling beneath the surface?" Our research aims to quench the curiosity of both financial analysts and water enthusiasts alike. We hope this paper makes a wave in the academic world while leaving readers both informed and refreshed.

*Do you know why we should never tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears!*

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Amidst the hustle and bustle of the financial world, there exists an unexpected correlation that has bubbled to the surface - the relationship between US bottled water consumption and the stock price of Kroger (KR). As the saying goes, "Water you thinking?" One might be tempted to ask, "What's the pourpose of studying such a connection?" Well, fear not, for we are here to quench that curiosity.
The significance of water consumption in the United States cannot be overestimated. The country has witnessed a shift in consumer preferences toward convenient, on-the-go hydration options. In fact, per capita consumption of bottled water has been on the rise, leading us to ponder whether this trend is merely a drop in the ocean or a ripple effect that extends to the stock market. It's like the stock market is saying, "Let's make some waves," while the water industry is exclaiming, "We're on a liquid diet!"
Meanwhile, Kroger, one of the largest supermarket chains in the United States, stands as a relevant entity in this study, as its performance is heavily influenced by consumer trends and behaviors. One might even say that Kroger's stock price is taking the plunge every time there's a surge in water consumption. It's like retail and hydration have become partners in a intricate dance, with the stock market saying, "I'm just trying to stay afloat," and water consumption replying, "I'm here to make a splash!"
This leads us to our research question: "Is there more to this correlation than meets the eye, or are we simply skimming the surface?" In the words of a wise investor, "I'm not watering down my portfolio with these stocks, I just have a thirst for financial success!"

[[RESULTS]]
After analyzing the data collected from 2002 to 2022, a remarkably strong positive correlation was observed between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Kroger (KR). The correlation coefficient of 0.8829960 indicates a robust relationship between these two variables, and the r-squared value of 0.7796819 suggests that approximately 78% of the variation in Kroger's stock price can be explained by changes in US bottled water consumption per person. Furthermore, the p-value being less than 0.01 demonstrates that this correlation is highly statistically significant.
Figure 1 illustrates the strong relationship between US bottled water consumption per person and Kroger's stock price. The scatterplot depicts a clear pattern, resembling the waves of the stock market mirroring the ebb and flow of water consumption. It's like the stock market is crying out, "Water we waiting for? Let's ride this wave to success!"
The results of this study provide compelling evidence of the unexpected connection between US bottled water consumption and Kroger's stock price. These findings raise thought-provoking questions about the influence of consumer behavior on the financial performance of retail companies. It's as if the stock market is saying, "Take stock of your hydration, and watch the market flow," while the bottles of water chime in, "We're not just refreshing, we're financially uplifting!"
The strong correlation uncovered in this research highlights the potential impact of consumer trends on the stock market, emphasizing the need to consider diverse and unconventional factors when analyzing stock performance. This unexpected relationship between bottled water consumption and stock prices urges us to delve deeper and explore what other surprising connections may exist in the financial world. It's like the market is full of mysteries, and we're here to solve them with a splash of humor and a drop of insight.
*Why couldn't the bicycle stand up by itself? Because it was two-tired!*

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has quenched the curiosity surrounding the unexpected, yet substantial, connection between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Kroger (KR). The remarkably high correlation coefficient not only suggests a strong relationship between these variables but also leaves us pondering whether investors are making a splash with their stock decisions or if there's something bubbling beneath the surface of this correlation. It's as if the stock market is saying, "Let's make some waves," while the bottled water industry is exclaiming, "We're on a liquid diet!"

These findings carry significant implications for financial analysts and enthusiasts alike, urging consideration of unconventional factors when evaluating stock performance. It's like the market is a treasure trove of unexpected associations, and we're here to dive in and explore what tides may turn next!

With such compelling evidence, one might even say that investing in Kroger's stock is making a "water-tight" financial decision. As they say, "When it rains, it pours – especially in the stock market!"

So, what's the pourpose of all this research, you may ask? Well, we believe it's essential to stay fluid and adaptive in our analyses, as surprises may lurk where we least expect them. After all, the unexpected can sometimes turn out to be a water-ful opportunity in the financial world!

In conclusion, it's clear that there's no need to pour more resources into this area of study. This research has made a wave in the academic world, leaving readers both informed and refreshed. So, let's water-ever research the topic! We should just say, "That's a wrap – no pun intended!"

*What do you call cheese that isn't yours? Nacho cheese!*


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Quench for Financial Success: A Thirsty Analysis of US Bottled Water Consumption and Kroger's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Thirstonomics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Quench for Financial Success: A Thirsty Analysis of US Bottled Water Consumption and Kroger's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Aquatic Economic Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Quench for Financial Success: A Thirsty Analysis of US Bottled Water Consumption and Kroger's Stock Price with an abstract of In this research paper, we dive into the quenching world of US bottled water consumption and its surprising correlation with the stock price of Kroger (KR). Utilizing data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning two decades, from 2002 to 2022. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8829960 and p < 0.01 between US bottled water consumption per person and the fluctuation of Kroger's stock price. This unexpected link has left us pondering, "Are investors making a splash with their stock decisions, or is there something bubbling beneath the surface?" Our research aims to quench the curiosity of both financial analysts and water enthusiasts alike. We hope this paper makes a wave in the academic world while leaving readers both informed and refreshed.
*Do you know why we should never tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears!*

ChatGPT:

US bottled water consumption, Kroger stock price correlation, US bottled water consumption per person, Kroger stock price fluctuation, financial analysis, stock market correlation, Statista data, LSEG Analytics data, correlation coefficient, stock investment decisions, financial analysts, water consumption analysis, academic research, financial success, refreshment industry, market analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

US Bottled Water Consumption per Person
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with US Bottled Water Consumption per Person

Kroger's stock price (KR)
Detailed data title: Opening price of The Kroger Co. (KR) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Kroger's stock price (KR)

Correlation r = 0.8829960 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7796819 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 78% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Kroger's stock price (KR)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., US Bottled Water Consumption per Person) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.2E-7. 0.0000001159291876744809400000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.88 in 1.2E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 8,625,955 random variables You don't actually need 8 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.73, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
US Bottled Water Consumption per Person (Gallons)20.121.623.225.427.62928.527.628.329.230.83234.136.5394242.34445.24746.5
Kroger's stock price (KR) (Stock price)10.47.859.288.859.4511.5413.3313.2510.2711.2212.2413.1719.6332.0641.1634.527.5427.3929.0331.7744.91




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([20.1,21.6,23.2,25.4,27.6,29,28.5,27.6,28.3,29.2,30.8,32,34.1,36.5,39,42,42.3,44,45.2,47,46.5,])
array_2 = np.array([10.4,7.85,9.28,8.85,9.45,11.54,13.33,13.25,10.27,11.22,12.24,13.17,19.63,32.06,41.16,34.5,27.54,27.39,29.03,31.77,44.91,])
array_1_name = "US Bottled Water Consumption per Person"
array_2_name = "Kroger's stock price (KR)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 2543 · Black Variable ID: 32 · Red Variable ID: 1822
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0