about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,277 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Stevie and the second variable is Lululemon's stock price (LULU).  The chart goes from 2008 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

This all comes down to a little-known psychological phenomenon called the "Stevie Style Effect." It turns out that people named Stevie have an innate ability to exude an aura of effortless coolness and a keen eye for sleek, comfortable activewear. As the number of individuals named Stevie grew, so did the demand for stylish yet functional athleisure apparel. This led to an unexpected surge in Lululemon's sales, prompting investors to clamor for LULU stock, driving up its price. Who would have thought that the name Stevie would hold the key to the rise of Lululemon? It's like they say, never underestimate the impact of a trendsetting Stevie on the sartorial choices of the masses!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create a vibrant image of a high-tech cityscape where a large crowd of people are gathered outside a Lululemon store, with the store's sleek, modern design standing out against the surrounding buildings. The scene is alive with excitement as the crowd of enthusiastic shoppers eagerly discuss the latest yoga pants and athletic wear, while a group of friends all named Stevie happily compare their purchases. The stock ticker outside the store prominently displays Lululemon's surging stock price, reflecting the brand's popularity and success in a visually captivating manner. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Stevie and Lululemon's stock price. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Macabre High-tech Charcoal Surrealism Cybernetic art
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Stevie and Lululemon's stock price together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling city, a crowd of people gather outside a Lululemon store, excitedly chatting about the latest yoga pants and athletic wear. Among them, a group of friends all named Stevie cheerfully compare their purchases, adding to the lively buzz with their enthusiasm. Meanwhile, the stock ticker outside the store prominently displays Lululemon's rising stock price, reflecting the brand's popularity and success.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling city, a crowd of people gather outside a Lululemon store, excitedly chatting about the latest yoga pants and athletic wear. Among them, a group of friends all named Stevie cheerfully compare their purchases, adding to the lively buzz with their enthusiasm. Meanwhile, the stock ticker outside the store prominently displays Lululemon's rising stock price, reflecting the brand's popularity and success. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create a vibrant image of a high-tech cityscape where a large crowd of people are gathered outside a Lululemon store, with the store's sleek, modern design standing out against the surrounding buildings. The scene is alive with excitement as the crowd of enthusiastic shoppers eagerly discuss the latest yoga pants and athletic wear, while a group of friends all named Stevie happily compare their purchases. The stock ticker outside the store prominently displays Lululemon's surging stock price, reflecting the brand's popularity and success in a visually captivating manner.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Stevie caused Lululemon's stock price (LULU) to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
LULU-lemonade: A Statistical Study of the Stevie-nized Market

Journal of Quirky Economics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Lululemon's stock price (LULU). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9802432 and p < 0.01 for 2008 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
LULU-lemonade: A Statistical Study of the Stevie-nized Market

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Harnessing the data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we endeavored to shed light on this unconventional correlation. Focusing on the period from 2008 to 2022, our research team observed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9802432 and a p-value much less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a strong, albeit unexpected, relationship between the prevalence of the name "Stevie" and the performance of LULU in the stock market. This discovery blurs the lines between market behavior and mirthful nomenclature, prompting further investigation into the whimsical dynamics at play.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Lululemon's stock price (LULU). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
LULU-lemonade: A Statistical Study of the Stevie-nized Market

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Harnessing the data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we endeavored to shed light on this unconventional correlation. Focusing on the period from 2008 to 2022, our research team observed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9802432 and a p-value much less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a strong, albeit unexpected, relationship between the prevalence of the name "Stevie" and the performance of LULU in the stock market. This discovery blurs the lines between market behavior and mirthful nomenclature, prompting further investigation into the whimsical dynamics at play.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

The correlation between personal nomenclature and financial market performance has long been a subject of intrigue and speculation. While traditional economic theories have predominantly focused on factors such as GDP growth, interest rates, and corporate earnings, our study delves into a less conventional yet perplexing association—the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). This whimsical investigation seeks to unravel the enigmatic connection between the prevalence of a specific moniker and the gyrations of LULU's stock price.

It is worth noting that while our research was initially met with skepticism and bemusement, the statistical analysis presented in this paper demonstrates a strikingly robust correlation between the frequency of the name "Stevie" and LULU's stock price movements. The implications of our findings stretch far beyond mere philosophical musings and call attention to the potential influence of seemingly arbitrary factors on financial markets. Who would have thought that the trajectory of a stock could be influenced by the popularity of a first name? Certainly not the conventional market analysts, but here we are, probing into the uncharted territory of market behavior and mirthful nomenclature.

Our investigation looks to challenge the traditional paradigms of market analysis and remind us that underneath the seemingly austere exterior of financial markets, there may lie a quirky interplay of sociocultural phenomena. As we embark on this analytical journey, we cannot help but marvel at the whimsical dynamics at play and ponder the implications of what we have coined the "Stevie-nized Market" phenomenon.

With a blend of earnest inquiry and a lighthearted spirit, we aim to unravel the curious connection between the popularity of the name "Stevie" and LULU's stock price, and perhaps, offer a refreshing perspective on the interplay between market forces and the serendipitous quirks of human identity.

So, buckle up and get ready for a comical yet cogent inquiry into the curious correlation that is LULU-lemonade: A Statistical Study of the Stevie-nized Market.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Lululemon's stock price (LULU). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
LULU-lemonade: A Statistical Study of the Stevie-nized Market

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Harnessing the data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we endeavored to shed light on this unconventional correlation. Focusing on the period from 2008 to 2022, our research team observed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9802432 and a p-value much less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a strong, albeit unexpected, relationship between the prevalence of the name "Stevie" and the performance of LULU in the stock market. This discovery blurs the lines between market behavior and mirthful nomenclature, prompting further investigation into the whimsical dynamics at play.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The correlation between personal nomenclature and financial market performance has long been a subject of intrigue and speculation. While traditional economic theories have predominantly focused on factors such as GDP growth, interest rates, and corporate earnings, our study delves into a less conventional yet perplexing association—the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). This whimsical investigation seeks to unravel the enigmatic connection between the prevalence of a specific moniker and the gyrations of LULU's stock price.
It is worth noting that while our research was initially met with skepticism and bemusement, the statistical analysis presented in this paper demonstrates a strikingly robust correlation between the frequency of the name "Stevie" and LULU's stock price movements. The implications of our findings stretch far beyond mere philosophical musings and call attention to the potential influence of seemingly arbitrary factors on financial markets. Who would have thought that the trajectory of a stock could be influenced by the popularity of a first name? Certainly not the conventional market analysts, but here we are, probing into the uncharted territory of market behavior and mirthful nomenclature.
Our investigation looks to challenge the traditional paradigms of market analysis and remind us that underneath the seemingly austere exterior of financial markets, there may lie a quirky interplay of sociocultural phenomena. As we embark on this analytical journey, we cannot help but marvel at the whimsical dynamics at play and ponder the implications of what we have coined the "Stevie-nized Market" phenomenon.
With a blend of earnest inquiry and a lighthearted spirit, we aim to unravel the curious connection between the popularity of the name "Stevie" and LULU's stock price, and perhaps, offer a refreshing perspective on the interplay between market forces and the serendipitous quirks of human identity.
So, buckle up and get ready for a comical yet cogent inquiry into the curious correlation that is LULU-lemonade: A Statistical Study of the Stevie-nized Market.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The curious correlation between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has piqued the interest of researchers and market enthusiasts alike. While traditional studies typically focus on more conventional economic indicators, such as interest rates and corporate earnings, the link between personal nomenclature and financial market performance presents a uniquely comical yet thought-provoking avenue of investigation.

Smith and Doe (2010) investigate the influence of personal names on consumer behavior, shedding light on the psychological effects of familiarity and likability associated with specific names. Their study provides compelling insights into the potential impact of personal names on consumer preferences, notably leaving us to wonder if the allure of "Stevie" extends beyond the individual to the realm of market dynamics.

In "The Economics of Nomenclature" by Jones (2015), the author delves into the potential societal implications of personal names on economic decision-making. With a blend of anecdotal evidence and quantitative analysis, Jones' work challenges conventional wisdom and encourages readers to contemplate the whimsical yet impactful nature of nomenclature in economic phenomena. As we examine the correlation between the popularity of the name "Stevie" and LULU's stock performance, Jones' insights prompt us to consider the possibility of a broader sociocultural influence on market behavior.

Turning to non-fiction literature, "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner (2005) offers a captivating exploration of unconventional economic theories and their implications for real-world phenomena. While "Freakonomics" does not specifically address the correlation between personal names and stock price movements, the spirit of unconventional inquiry that permeates the book serves as a fitting backdrop for our investigation into the enigmatic link between "Stevie" and LULU.

In a similar vein, the works of fiction offer an interesting lens through which to contemplate the interplay of societal quirks and market dynamics. Consider "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "The Catcher in the Rye" by J.D. Salinger—both works underscore the significance of personal identity and its potential impact on individual journeys, albeit in markedly different contexts. While these literary masterpieces may not directly inform our statistical analysis, their exploration of the nuanced nature of identity prompts us to ponder the potential influence of personal nomenclature on market phenomena in a lighthearted manner.

Furthermore, a recent discourse on social media platforms has captured the attention of our research team. A Twitter post by @MarketMaven247 humorously suggests that the rise and fall of LULU's stock price can be attributed to the whims of individuals named "Stevie" making inordinate purchases of Lululemon apparel. While the post is undoubtedly tongue-in-cheek, the underlying lighthearted speculation raises interesting questions about the interplay between personal nomenclature and brand affinity, adding a touch of levity to our investigation.

In this unconventional and comical pursuit of knowledge, our exploration into the correlation between the popularity of the name "Stevie" and LULU's stock price seeks to reconcile statistical rigor with an appreciation for the unexpected and whimsical. As we navigate through the intersecting realms of market behavior and mirthful nomenclature, we invite our readers to join us on this analytical journey and embrace the delightful peculiarity that is the LULU-lemonade: A Statistical Study of the Stevie-nized Market.

And there you have it, a delightful blend of academic rigor and lighthearted inquiry into the curious correlation between "Stevie" and LULU's stock price movements. We've taken a comedic detour in the land of scholarly literature, but hey, it's all in the name of academic amusement!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Lululemon's stock price (LULU). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2008 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
LULU-lemonade: A Statistical Study of the Stevie-nized Market

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Harnessing the data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we endeavored to shed light on this unconventional correlation. Focusing on the period from 2008 to 2022, our research team observed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9802432 and a p-value much less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a strong, albeit unexpected, relationship between the prevalence of the name "Stevie" and the performance of LULU in the stock market. This discovery blurs the lines between market behavior and mirthful nomenclature, prompting further investigation into the whimsical dynamics at play.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The correlation between personal nomenclature and financial market performance has long been a subject of intrigue and speculation. While traditional economic theories have predominantly focused on factors such as GDP growth, interest rates, and corporate earnings, our study delves into a less conventional yet perplexing association—the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). This whimsical investigation seeks to unravel the enigmatic connection between the prevalence of a specific moniker and the gyrations of LULU's stock price.
It is worth noting that while our research was initially met with skepticism and bemusement, the statistical analysis presented in this paper demonstrates a strikingly robust correlation between the frequency of the name "Stevie" and LULU's stock price movements. The implications of our findings stretch far beyond mere philosophical musings and call attention to the potential influence of seemingly arbitrary factors on financial markets. Who would have thought that the trajectory of a stock could be influenced by the popularity of a first name? Certainly not the conventional market analysts, but here we are, probing into the uncharted territory of market behavior and mirthful nomenclature.
Our investigation looks to challenge the traditional paradigms of market analysis and remind us that underneath the seemingly austere exterior of financial markets, there may lie a quirky interplay of sociocultural phenomena. As we embark on this analytical journey, we cannot help but marvel at the whimsical dynamics at play and ponder the implications of what we have coined the "Stevie-nized Market" phenomenon.
With a blend of earnest inquiry and a lighthearted spirit, we aim to unravel the curious connection between the popularity of the name "Stevie" and LULU's stock price, and perhaps, offer a refreshing perspective on the interplay between market forces and the serendipitous quirks of human identity.
So, buckle up and get ready for a comical yet cogent inquiry into the curious correlation that is LULU-lemonade: A Statistical Study of the Stevie-nized Market.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the hidden connection between the burgeoning popularity of the name "Stevie" and the fluctuating stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU), our research team embarked on a journey that was part statistical analysis, part sleuthing for serendipitous correlations.

Data Collection:
Our data collection process began with a thorough scouring of the US Social Security Administration database to extract the frequency of the first name "Stevie" from 2008 to 2022. This was complemented by the procurement of LULU's stock price data from the esteemed LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), covering the same time period. The utilization of these sources allowed us to capture the zeitgeist of nomenclature alongside the undulating tides of the stock market, creating a concoction of data that would make both a genealogist and a financial analyst raise an eyebrow.

Statistical Analysis:
With data in hand, we dove headfirst into the statistical whirlpool, employing rigorous methodologies to unravel the enigmatic correlation veiled within the annals of numbers. The statistical techniques utilized included Pearson correlation coefficient, time series analysis, and trend tracking. Now, we understand that to some, these statistical machinations might seem as enthralling as watching grass grow, but rest assured, beneath the seemingly mundane surface lay insights into the whimsical marriage of nomenclature and market momentum.

Correlation Coefficient and P-Value:
An essential ingredient in our analytical potion was the calculation of the Pearson correlation coefficient, which chirped out a rhapsodic value of 0.9802432. This value not only raised an eyebrow but also prompted a chirpy "What's up?" from the statisticians in the room. Additionally, the p-value, which danced jubilantly at a level much less than 0.01, furthered our intrigue and fueled our determination to unravel the mysteries of this Stevie-LULU tango.

Thematic Analysis:
In an endeavor to infuse depth into our investigation, we conducted a thematic analysis, juxtaposing the historical trajectories of the name "Stevie" with the undulations of LULU's stock price. This qualitative approach allowed us to unravel the subtle dance between societal nomenclature and capital market dynamics, painting a vivid portrait of the interplay between human identity and financial fervor.

The amalgamation of these methodological contraptions granted us an unparalleled vantage point from which to decipher the unlikely yet compelling correlation between the first name "Stevie" and the fortunes of LULU in the stock market. As we unravel this peculiar connection, let us not forget to don our thinking caps laced with a dash of whimsy, for the pursuit of knowledge should always include a sprinkle of mirth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Lululemon's stock price (LULU). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2008 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9802432, r-squared of 0.9608767, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
LULU-lemonade: A Statistical Study of the Stevie-nized Market

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Harnessing the data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we endeavored to shed light on this unconventional correlation. Focusing on the period from 2008 to 2022, our research team observed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9802432 and a p-value much less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a strong, albeit unexpected, relationship between the prevalence of the name "Stevie" and the performance of LULU in the stock market. This discovery blurs the lines between market behavior and mirthful nomenclature, prompting further investigation into the whimsical dynamics at play.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
The correlation between personal nomenclature and financial market performance has long been a subject of intrigue and speculation. While traditional economic theories have predominantly focused on factors such as GDP growth, interest rates, and corporate earnings, our study delves into a less conventional yet perplexing association—the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). This whimsical investigation seeks to unravel the enigmatic connection between the prevalence of a specific moniker and the gyrations of LULU's stock price.
It is worth noting that while our research was initially met with skepticism and bemusement, the statistical analysis presented in this paper demonstrates a strikingly robust correlation between the frequency of the name "Stevie" and LULU's stock price movements. The implications of our findings stretch far beyond mere philosophical musings and call attention to the potential influence of seemingly arbitrary factors on financial markets. Who would have thought that the trajectory of a stock could be influenced by the popularity of a first name? Certainly not the conventional market analysts, but here we are, probing into the uncharted territory of market behavior and mirthful nomenclature.
Our investigation looks to challenge the traditional paradigms of market analysis and remind us that underneath the seemingly austere exterior of financial markets, there may lie a quirky interplay of sociocultural phenomena. As we embark on this analytical journey, we cannot help but marvel at the whimsical dynamics at play and ponder the implications of what we have coined the "Stevie-nized Market" phenomenon.
With a blend of earnest inquiry and a lighthearted spirit, we aim to unravel the curious connection between the popularity of the name "Stevie" and LULU's stock price, and perhaps, offer a refreshing perspective on the interplay between market forces and the serendipitous quirks of human identity.
So, buckle up and get ready for a comical yet cogent inquiry into the curious correlation that is LULU-lemonade: A Statistical Study of the Stevie-nized Market.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) for the period from 2008 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9802432 indicates a strong positive relationship between the prevalence of the name "Stevie" and the performance of LULU in the stock market. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.9608767, signifying that approximately 96.1% of the variability in LULU's stock price can be explained by changes in the prevalence of the name "Stevie." The p-value obtained was much less than 0.01, providing strong evidence against the null hypothesis and indicating that the observed correlation is statistically significant.

These findings suggest a compelling association between the frequency of the name "Stevie" and the movements of LULU's stock price. The implications of such a correlation challenge traditional notions of market analysis and raise thought-provoking questions about the influence of sociocultural phenomena on financial markets. It appears that beneath the veneer of rational market behavior, there exists a perplexing interplay between human identity and market dynamics, blurring the lines between what is traditionally deemed as serious market analysis and the whimsical nuances of nomenclature.

Figure 1 illustrates the scatterplot depicting the strong correlation between the frequency of the name "Stevie" and LULU's stock price. This visual representation vividly encapsulates the robust relationship observed in our statistical analysis.

In conclusion, the results of our study emphasize the unexpected yet substantial connection between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the performance of LULU in the stock market. This unorthodox correlation, though initially met with skepticism, highlights the intricate and unconventional undercurrents that may sway financial markets. Our findings prompt further inquiry into the peculiar dynamics of the "Stevie-nized Market" phenomenon, inviting scholarly exploration and lighthearted contemplation of the delightful idiosyncrasies that underpin the world of finance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Lululemon's stock price (LULU). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
LULU-lemonade: A Statistical Study of the Stevie-nized Market

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Harnessing the data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we endeavored to shed light on this unconventional correlation. Focusing on the period from 2008 to 2022, our research team observed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9802432 and a p-value much less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a strong, albeit unexpected, relationship between the prevalence of the name "Stevie" and the performance of LULU in the stock market. This discovery blurs the lines between market behavior and mirthful nomenclature, prompting further investigation into the whimsical dynamics at play.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The curious correlation between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has piqued the interest of researchers and market enthusiasts alike. While traditional studies typically focus on more conventional economic indicators, such as interest rates and corporate earnings, the link between personal nomenclature and financial market performance presents a uniquely comical yet thought-provoking avenue of investigation.
Smith and Doe (2010) investigate the influence of personal names on consumer behavior, shedding light on the psychological effects of familiarity and likability associated with specific names. Their study provides compelling insights into the potential impact of personal names on consumer preferences, notably leaving us to wonder if the allure of "Stevie" extends beyond the individual to the realm of market dynamics.
In "The Economics of Nomenclature" by Jones (2015), the author delves into the potential societal implications of personal names on economic decision-making. With a blend of anecdotal evidence and quantitative analysis, Jones' work challenges conventional wisdom and encourages readers to contemplate the whimsical yet impactful nature of nomenclature in economic phenomena. As we examine the correlation between the popularity of the name "Stevie" and LULU's stock performance, Jones' insights prompt us to consider the possibility of a broader sociocultural influence on market behavior.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner (2005) offers a captivating exploration of unconventional economic theories and their implications for real-world phenomena. While "Freakonomics" does not specifically address the correlation between personal names and stock price movements, the spirit of unconventional inquiry that permeates the book serves as a fitting backdrop for our investigation into the enigmatic link between "Stevie" and LULU.
In a similar vein, the works of fiction offer an interesting lens through which to contemplate the interplay of societal quirks and market dynamics. Consider "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "The Catcher in the Rye" by J.D. Salinger—both works underscore the significance of personal identity and its potential impact on individual journeys, albeit in markedly different contexts. While these literary masterpieces may not directly inform our statistical analysis, their exploration of the nuanced nature of identity prompts us to ponder the potential influence of personal nomenclature on market phenomena in a lighthearted manner.
Furthermore, a recent discourse on social media platforms has captured the attention of our research team. A Twitter post by @MarketMaven247 humorously suggests that the rise and fall of LULU's stock price can be attributed to the whims of individuals named "Stevie" making inordinate purchases of Lululemon apparel. While the post is undoubtedly tongue-in-cheek, the underlying lighthearted speculation raises interesting questions about the interplay between personal nomenclature and brand affinity, adding a touch of levity to our investigation.
In this unconventional and comical pursuit of knowledge, our exploration into the correlation between the popularity of the name "Stevie" and LULU's stock price seeks to reconcile statistical rigor with an appreciation for the unexpected and whimsical. As we navigate through the intersecting realms of market behavior and mirthful nomenclature, we invite our readers to join us on this analytical journey and embrace the delightful peculiarity that is the LULU-lemonade: A Statistical Study of the Stevie-nized Market.
And there you have it, a delightful blend of academic rigor and lighthearted inquiry into the curious correlation between "Stevie" and LULU's stock price movements. We've taken a comedic detour in the land of scholarly literature, but hey, it's all in the name of academic amusement!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) for the period from 2008 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9802432 indicates a strong positive relationship between the prevalence of the name "Stevie" and the performance of LULU in the stock market. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.9608767, signifying that approximately 96.1% of the variability in LULU's stock price can be explained by changes in the prevalence of the name "Stevie." The p-value obtained was much less than 0.01, providing strong evidence against the null hypothesis and indicating that the observed correlation is statistically significant.
These findings suggest a compelling association between the frequency of the name "Stevie" and the movements of LULU's stock price. The implications of such a correlation challenge traditional notions of market analysis and raise thought-provoking questions about the influence of sociocultural phenomena on financial markets. It appears that beneath the veneer of rational market behavior, there exists a perplexing interplay between human identity and market dynamics, blurring the lines between what is traditionally deemed as serious market analysis and the whimsical nuances of nomenclature.
Figure 1 illustrates the scatterplot depicting the strong correlation between the frequency of the name "Stevie" and LULU's stock price. This visual representation vividly encapsulates the robust relationship observed in our statistical analysis.
In conclusion, the results of our study emphasize the unexpected yet substantial connection between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the performance of LULU in the stock market. This unorthodox correlation, though initially met with skepticism, highlights the intricate and unconventional undercurrents that may sway financial markets. Our findings prompt further inquiry into the peculiar dynamics of the "Stevie-nized Market" phenomenon, inviting scholarly exploration and lighthearted contemplation of the delightful idiosyncrasies that underpin the world of finance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study corroborate the prior research that hinted at the influence of personal nomenclature on market dynamics. While the connection between the prevalence of the name "Stevie" and Lululemon Athletica Inc.'s (LULU) stock performance may initially elicit a chuckle, our findings underscore the robustness of this correlation. Smith and Doe's (2010) insights into the psychological impact of familiar and likable names take on a new light as we observe the substantial association between the popularity of "Stevie" and LULU's stock price. It appears that the allure of the name "Stevie" extends beyond individual consumer behavior to influence the market as a whole, a notion that may tickle the fancy of even the most serious market analysts.

Moreover, Jones' (2015) exploration of the potential sociocultural implications of personal names on economic decision-making prompts us to consider the broader societal undercurrents shaping market phenomena. As our statistical analysis unveils the striking correlation between "Stevie" and LULU, it becomes evident that the whimsical dynamics of nomenclature may wield unexpected influence on financial markets, leaving us in a curious conundrum of serious market analysis intersecting with mirthful nomenclature.

Figure 1 vividly portrays the robust relationship between the frequency of the name "Stevie" and LULU's stock price, serving as a visual testament to the unexpectedly substantial connection that characterizes the "Stevie-nized Market" phenomenon. This empirical evidence not only supports our findings but also invites a lighthearted contemplation of the delightful idiosyncrasies that underpin the world of finance. After all, who would have thought that the name "Stevie" could hold such sway over the fluctuating tides of the stock market?

The statistically significant correlation coefficient and the remarkably high coefficient of determination reaffirm the profound association between the prevalence of "Stevie" and the performance of LULU in the stock market. While this connection may raise eyebrows and elicit a wry grin, the empirical evidence leaves little room for skepticism. It appears that the whims of personal nomenclature intricately entwine with the serious matter of financial market dynamics, creating a tapestry of market behavior that is as amusing as it is perplexing.

In conclusion, our analysis has paved the way for further scholarly inquiry into the captivating enigma of the "Stevie-nized Market." As we confront the unexpected peculiarities of this correlation, we anticipate that our study will spark an intellectual curiosity that blends academic rigor with a whimsical embrace of the delightful idiosyncrasies that underpin the realm of finance. After all, sometimes, the most remarkable insights spring from the unlikeliest of sources.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Lululemon's stock price (LULU). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
LULU-lemonade: A Statistical Study of the Stevie-nized Market

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Harnessing the data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we endeavored to shed light on this unconventional correlation. Focusing on the period from 2008 to 2022, our research team observed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9802432 and a p-value much less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a strong, albeit unexpected, relationship between the prevalence of the name "Stevie" and the performance of LULU in the stock market. This discovery blurs the lines between market behavior and mirthful nomenclature, prompting further investigation into the whimsical dynamics at play.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
The correlation between personal nomenclature and financial market performance has long been a subject of intrigue and speculation. While traditional economic theories have predominantly focused on factors such as GDP growth, interest rates, and corporate earnings, our study delves into a less conventional yet perplexing association—the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). This whimsical investigation seeks to unravel the enigmatic connection between the prevalence of a specific moniker and the gyrations of LULU's stock price.
It is worth noting that while our research was initially met with skepticism and bemusement, the statistical analysis presented in this paper demonstrates a strikingly robust correlation between the frequency of the name "Stevie" and LULU's stock price movements. The implications of our findings stretch far beyond mere philosophical musings and call attention to the potential influence of seemingly arbitrary factors on financial markets. Who would have thought that the trajectory of a stock could be influenced by the popularity of a first name? Certainly not the conventional market analysts, but here we are, probing into the uncharted territory of market behavior and mirthful nomenclature.
Our investigation looks to challenge the traditional paradigms of market analysis and remind us that underneath the seemingly austere exterior of financial markets, there may lie a quirky interplay of sociocultural phenomena. As we embark on this analytical journey, we cannot help but marvel at the whimsical dynamics at play and ponder the implications of what we have coined the "Stevie-nized Market" phenomenon.
With a blend of earnest inquiry and a lighthearted spirit, we aim to unravel the curious connection between the popularity of the name "Stevie" and LULU's stock price, and perhaps, offer a refreshing perspective on the interplay between market forces and the serendipitous quirks of human identity.
So, buckle up and get ready for a comical yet cogent inquiry into the curious correlation that is LULU-lemonade: A Statistical Study of the Stevie-nized Market.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) for the period from 2008 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9802432 indicates a strong positive relationship between the prevalence of the name "Stevie" and the performance of LULU in the stock market. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.9608767, signifying that approximately 96.1% of the variability in LULU's stock price can be explained by changes in the prevalence of the name "Stevie." The p-value obtained was much less than 0.01, providing strong evidence against the null hypothesis and indicating that the observed correlation is statistically significant.
These findings suggest a compelling association between the frequency of the name "Stevie" and the movements of LULU's stock price. The implications of such a correlation challenge traditional notions of market analysis and raise thought-provoking questions about the influence of sociocultural phenomena on financial markets. It appears that beneath the veneer of rational market behavior, there exists a perplexing interplay between human identity and market dynamics, blurring the lines between what is traditionally deemed as serious market analysis and the whimsical nuances of nomenclature.
Figure 1 illustrates the scatterplot depicting the strong correlation between the frequency of the name "Stevie" and LULU's stock price. This visual representation vividly encapsulates the robust relationship observed in our statistical analysis.
In conclusion, the results of our study emphasize the unexpected yet substantial connection between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the performance of LULU in the stock market. This unorthodox correlation, though initially met with skepticism, highlights the intricate and unconventional undercurrents that may sway financial markets. Our findings prompt further inquiry into the peculiar dynamics of the "Stevie-nized Market" phenomenon, inviting scholarly exploration and lighthearted contemplation of the delightful idiosyncrasies that underpin the world of finance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unraveled the unexpectedly robust relationship between the prevalence of the name "Stevie" and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). The remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9802432 and the highly significant p-value have left us both astounded and slightly tickled. Our findings not only challenge traditional economic theories but also evoke a sense of whimsy, reminding us that even in the realm of finance, there may be room for the unpredictable and the mirthful. We have certainly shaken up the traditional market analysis with our exploration of the "Stevie-nized Market" phenomenon, proving that there might just be a “Stevie Wonder” influencing LULU’s stock prices.

This investigation has not only broadened our understanding of market behavior but also injected a dose of lighthearted amusement into the serious world of financial analysis. The implications of this correlation are far-reaching, potentially paving the way for a new wave of research delving into the playful interplay between sociocultural phenomena and market dynamics. Who would have thought that a simple name could hold such sway over stock prices? It's almost as if our financial system is performing a whimsical tap dance to the beat of a "Stevie" wonder.

As we wrap up this study, we are left with the realization that the "Stevie-nized Market" may just be the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the unconventional influences on stock performance. No doubt, this study has opened the door to a world of possibilities in market analysis, reminding us not to take ourselves too seriously and to embrace the delightful quirks that make the financial world an enchanting riddle to solve.

In light of these revelatory findings, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, as we have surely "Stevie"d into something extraordinary.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited LULU-lemonade: A Statistical Study of the Stevie-nized Market. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Quirky Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited LULU-lemonade: A Statistical Study of the Stevie-nized Market. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Quantitative Research (SQUIRQ)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled LULU-lemonade: A Statistical Study of the Stevie-nized Market with an abstract of This study investigates the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Stevie" and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Harnessing the data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we endeavored to shed light on this unconventional correlation. Focusing on the period from 2008 to 2022, our research team observed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9802432 and a p-value much less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a strong, albeit unexpected, relationship between the prevalence of the name "Stevie" and the performance of LULU in the stock market. This discovery blurs the lines between market behavior and mirthful nomenclature, prompting further investigation into the whimsical dynamics at play.

ChatGPT:

Lululemon Athletica Inc., Stevie, stock price, correlation, statistical study, market dynamics, US Social Security Administration data, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, market behavior, stock market performance, name "Stevie", nomenclature, whimsical correlation, mirthful dynamics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Stevie
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Stevie
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Stevie

Lululemon's stock price (LULU)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Lululemon Athletica (LULU) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Lululemon's stock price (LULU)

Correlation r = 0.9802432 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9608767 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 96.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Lululemon's stock price (LULU)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Stevie) over the 15 years from 2008 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.6E-10. 0.0000000001566574859064813500
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 1.6E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 6,383,352,792 random variables You don't actually need 6 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.94, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Stevie (Babies born)21724021022725426031831237944447362980111471217
Lululemon's stock price (LULU) (Stock price)23.73.9815.4434.747.577.7359.0856.0153.7165.9477.31118.89232.9351.67392.2




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([217,240,210,227,254,260,318,312,379,444,473,629,801,1147,1217,])
array_2 = np.array([23.7,3.98,15.44,34.7,47.5,77.73,59.08,56.01,53.71,65.94,77.31,118.89,232.9,351.67,392.2,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Stevie"
array_2_name = "Lululemon's stock price (LULU)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 2277 · Black Variable ID: 3190 · Red Variable ID: 1735
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0