about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,111 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Fossil fuel use in Brazil and the second variable is US Annual Tax Revenue.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Well, you see, as Brazil started revving up the fossil fuel action, all those extra emissions must have wafted their way up to the US, fertilizing the economy and causing a surge in productivity. It's like Brazil and the US were in cahoots, with every puff of exhaust from the Amazon rainforest fueling the IRS's coffers. Who would have thought that the road to financial success was paved with a bit of Brazilian gas? A truly gas-tly connection indeed!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A scene from Skyrim ]: A dragon swoops down from a clear sky, breathing fire over a landscape adorned with lush, green trees and snow-capped mountains. Below, a majestic castle built of ancient stone overlooks a bustling harbor filled with colossal ships from distant lands. The townspeople go about their daily lives, weaving through cobblestone streets as merchants and adventurers haggle and barter. As the dragon looms overhead, a group of warriors stand ready with swords and shields, prepared to defend their home from the legendary creature. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Fossil fuel use in Brazil and US Annual Tax Revenue. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Photorealism Hyper-realistic Minimalism A scene from Skyrim Magic realism
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Fossil fuel use in Brazil and US Annual Tax Revenue together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A bustling highway in Brazil is lined with cars and trucks fueled by fossil fuels, with billowing smoke coming out of their exhaust pipes. Alongside the highway, a busy US tax office is processing payments from individuals and businesses, with stacks of money piling up signifying the annual tax revenue.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: A bustling highway in Brazil is lined with cars and trucks fueled by fossil fuels, with billowing smoke coming out of their exhaust pipes. Alongside the highway, a busy US tax office is processing payments from individuals and businesses, with stacks of money piling up signifying the annual tax revenue. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A scene from Skyrim ]: A dragon swoops down from a clear sky, breathing fire over a landscape adorned with lush, green trees and snow-capped mountains. Below, a majestic castle built of ancient stone overlooks a bustling harbor filled with colossal ships from distant lands. The townspeople go about their daily lives, weaving through cobblestone streets as merchants and adventurers haggle and barter. As the dragon looms overhead, a group of warriors stand ready with swords and shields, prepared to defend their home from the legendary creature.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Fossil fuel use in Brazil caused US Annual Tax Revenue to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fueling Finances: Fossil Fuel Use in Brazil and US Annual Tax Revenue

Journal of Energy Economics and Environmental Policy

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Brazil and US Annual Tax Revenue. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and About.Com to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9064749 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling Finances: Fossil Fuel Use in Brazil and US Annual Tax Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the relationship between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue. Leveraging data from the Energy Information Administration and About.Com, we aimed to shed light on this fiery topic. Our analysis revealed a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9064749 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. It seems that the burning questions surrounding this connection are heating up! Our findings indicate a strong positive association between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue, suggesting that as fossil fuel consumption in Brazil rises, so does US tax revenue. This connection between the two is truly gaseous, I mean, "gracious"! We discuss the implications of these findings and propose potential policy measures to further fuel the financial synergies between the two nations. Our research ignites a spark of curiosity, fueling further investigations into the interplay between fossil fuel use and tax revenue.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Brazil and US Annual Tax Revenue. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling Finances: Fossil Fuel Use in Brazil and US Annual Tax Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the relationship between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue. Leveraging data from the Energy Information Administration and About.Com, we aimed to shed light on this fiery topic. Our analysis revealed a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9064749 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. It seems that the burning questions surrounding this connection are heating up! Our findings indicate a strong positive association between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue, suggesting that as fossil fuel consumption in Brazil rises, so does US tax revenue. This connection between the two is truly gaseous, I mean, "gracious"! We discuss the implications of these findings and propose potential policy measures to further fuel the financial synergies between the two nations. Our research ignites a spark of curiosity, fueling further investigations into the interplay between fossil fuel use and tax revenue.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the global demand for energy continues to soar, the relationship between fossil fuel use and economic indicators has become a hot topic of debate. In particular, the connection between fossil fuel consumption in Brazil and US annual tax revenue has sparked interest among researchers and policymakers alike. It's like trying to determine if the fuel that powers our world also fuels our finances - a burning question indeed!

Speaking of burning, did you hear about the scientist who accidentally lit her research notes on fire? She claims it was an "unintended replication study"! Now, let's turn our attention to the scorching correlation between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US tax revenue.

The fluctuation in fossil fuel prices and consumption patterns has wide-reaching implications for economies worldwide, and the interplay between Brazil's fossil fuel use and US tax revenue is no exception. This relationship is akin to a well-oiled machine - when one part heats up, it can have cascading effects on the overall system. It's all about finding the perfect fuel-to-tax ratio, don't you think?

Our study aims to harness the power of statistical analysis to shed light on this fiery topic and add fuel to the existing literature on energy economics. Our findings are like striking gold in the world of data - they reveal a correlation coefficient that's hotter than a sizzling barbecue, and a p-value lower than a mole's basement. It seems that when it comes to the connection between fossil fuel consumption in Brazil and US tax revenue, the relationship is not just smokin', it's scorching!

It's like trying to find the optimal mix of fuel and flair, don't you agree? Our research ignites a spark of curiosity, fueling further investigations into the interplay between fossil fuel use and tax revenue. So, let's fire up the statistical engines and delve into the flaming connection between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Brazil and US Annual Tax Revenue. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling Finances: Fossil Fuel Use in Brazil and US Annual Tax Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the relationship between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue. Leveraging data from the Energy Information Administration and About.Com, we aimed to shed light on this fiery topic. Our analysis revealed a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9064749 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. It seems that the burning questions surrounding this connection are heating up! Our findings indicate a strong positive association between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue, suggesting that as fossil fuel consumption in Brazil rises, so does US tax revenue. This connection between the two is truly gaseous, I mean, "gracious"! We discuss the implications of these findings and propose potential policy measures to further fuel the financial synergies between the two nations. Our research ignites a spark of curiosity, fueling further investigations into the interplay between fossil fuel use and tax revenue.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the global demand for energy continues to soar, the relationship between fossil fuel use and economic indicators has become a hot topic of debate. In particular, the connection between fossil fuel consumption in Brazil and US annual tax revenue has sparked interest among researchers and policymakers alike. It's like trying to determine if the fuel that powers our world also fuels our finances - a burning question indeed!
Speaking of burning, did you hear about the scientist who accidentally lit her research notes on fire? She claims it was an "unintended replication study"! Now, let's turn our attention to the scorching correlation between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US tax revenue.
The fluctuation in fossil fuel prices and consumption patterns has wide-reaching implications for economies worldwide, and the interplay between Brazil's fossil fuel use and US tax revenue is no exception. This relationship is akin to a well-oiled machine - when one part heats up, it can have cascading effects on the overall system. It's all about finding the perfect fuel-to-tax ratio, don't you think?
Our study aims to harness the power of statistical analysis to shed light on this fiery topic and add fuel to the existing literature on energy economics. Our findings are like striking gold in the world of data - they reveal a correlation coefficient that's hotter than a sizzling barbecue, and a p-value lower than a mole's basement. It seems that when it comes to the connection between fossil fuel consumption in Brazil and US tax revenue, the relationship is not just smokin', it's scorching!
It's like trying to find the optimal mix of fuel and flair, don't you agree? Our research ignites a spark of curiosity, fueling further investigations into the interplay between fossil fuel use and tax revenue. So, let's fire up the statistical engines and delve into the flaming connection between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Prior investigations into the interplay between fossil fuel use and tax revenue have laid the foundation for our current inquiry. Smith et al. (2015) examined the relationship between fossil fuel consumption in various countries and their respective tax revenues, offering valuable insights into the potential fiscal impacts of energy use. Additionally, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the specifics of fossil fuel taxation and revenue generation in the context of international trade, shedding light on the complex dynamics at play.

Speaking of complex dynamics, did you hear about the scientist who turned himself into a pickle? He called himself "Dill Nye the Science Guy"! Now, let's rev up our engines and explore the sizzling connection between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue.

Further contributing to the discussion, "The Economics of Energy: What Went Wrong" by Thompson (2017) and "The Global Impact of Fossil Fuel Dependency" by White (2019) provide essential context for understanding the broader economic implications of fossil fuel consumption. These works offer a wealth of information and spark further interest in the flaming relationship between energy use and financial dynamics.

Looking at the fiction side of the spectrum, "The Fire Within: A Tale of Energy and Economics" by Redwood (fictional) captures the imagination with its fiery narrative and serves as a metaphorical kindling for our exploration of fossil fuel's financial flames. In a similar vein, "Burning Up the Balance Sheets: A Novel Approach to Economic Relations" by Ember (also fictional) presents a captivating account of the intersection between energy and economics, fueling our intellectual curiosity with its daring prose.

And as for our own approach to literature review, we spared no effort in ensuring a comprehensive analysis of existing research. In addition to scholarly sources, we ventured into uncharted territories, including the backs of shampoo bottles, where "Lather, Rinse, Repeat: A Tale of Tax and Toiletries" (completely made up) provided unexpected wisdom on the tax implications of personal hygiene. While not the most traditional source, it certainly added a touch of levity to our investigation.

In summary, the existing literature sets the stage for our exploration of the scorching correlation between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue. The combination of serious scholarship and playful curiosity creates a combustible mix that fuels our pursuit of knowledge in this fiery field. Let's stoke the flames of inquiry and dive into our own illuminating findings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Brazil and US Annual Tax Revenue. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and About.Com . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling Finances: Fossil Fuel Use in Brazil and US Annual Tax Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the relationship between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue. Leveraging data from the Energy Information Administration and About.Com, we aimed to shed light on this fiery topic. Our analysis revealed a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9064749 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. It seems that the burning questions surrounding this connection are heating up! Our findings indicate a strong positive association between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue, suggesting that as fossil fuel consumption in Brazil rises, so does US tax revenue. This connection between the two is truly gaseous, I mean, "gracious"! We discuss the implications of these findings and propose potential policy measures to further fuel the financial synergies between the two nations. Our research ignites a spark of curiosity, fueling further investigations into the interplay between fossil fuel use and tax revenue.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the global demand for energy continues to soar, the relationship between fossil fuel use and economic indicators has become a hot topic of debate. In particular, the connection between fossil fuel consumption in Brazil and US annual tax revenue has sparked interest among researchers and policymakers alike. It's like trying to determine if the fuel that powers our world also fuels our finances - a burning question indeed!
Speaking of burning, did you hear about the scientist who accidentally lit her research notes on fire? She claims it was an "unintended replication study"! Now, let's turn our attention to the scorching correlation between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US tax revenue.
The fluctuation in fossil fuel prices and consumption patterns has wide-reaching implications for economies worldwide, and the interplay between Brazil's fossil fuel use and US tax revenue is no exception. This relationship is akin to a well-oiled machine - when one part heats up, it can have cascading effects on the overall system. It's all about finding the perfect fuel-to-tax ratio, don't you think?
Our study aims to harness the power of statistical analysis to shed light on this fiery topic and add fuel to the existing literature on energy economics. Our findings are like striking gold in the world of data - they reveal a correlation coefficient that's hotter than a sizzling barbecue, and a p-value lower than a mole's basement. It seems that when it comes to the connection between fossil fuel consumption in Brazil and US tax revenue, the relationship is not just smokin', it's scorching!
It's like trying to find the optimal mix of fuel and flair, don't you agree? Our research ignites a spark of curiosity, fueling further investigations into the interplay between fossil fuel use and tax revenue. So, let's fire up the statistical engines and delve into the flaming connection between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to investigate the scorching connection between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue, our research team employed a sizzling array of statistical and econometric methods. We utilized a variety of data sources, including the Energy Information Administration and About.Com, to gather detailed information on fossil fuel consumption in Brazil and US tax revenue from the years 1980 to 2021. Our data collection process was about as rigorous as a wildfire evacuation drill - leaving no statistical stone unturned!

To start off, we engaged in some fiery data cleaning and preprocessing, ensuring that our dataset was as pristine as a freshly polished flame detector. We then conducted a thorough exploration of the data, examining the trends and fluctuations in fossil fuel use in Brazil and US tax revenue over the three-decade period. Our statistical journey through the data was akin to navigating a labyrinth of infernos - but we emerged with a treasure trove of insights hotter than a jalapeno pepper!

Applying a red-hot bivariate analysis, we calculated the scorching correlation coefficient between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US tax revenue. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient so strong, it could power a thousand combustion engines - with a value of 0.9064749. This coefficient was as impressive as finding a rare gem amidst a sea of statistical rubble!

Furthermore, to assess the significance of this sizzling relationship, we conducted a blistering hypothesis test, resulting in a p-value that was lower than the temperature in an ice cream truck during a heatwave. With a p-value less than 0.01, our results provided robust evidence for the association between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US tax revenue, leaving little room for statistical doubt!

But, I must say, our journey through the statistical inferno was not without its challenges. Just like navigating through a complex maze of scientific puzzles, we encountered some data anomalies that were as puzzling as a riddle wrapped in an enigma wrapped in a statistical conundrum. However, with meticulous care and statistical prowess, we managed to tame these anomalies and ensure the reliability of our findings.

In conclusion, our methodology blazed a trail through the statistical wilderness, harnessing the power of data analysis to illuminate the fiery connection between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue. Our findings are like a glowing ember in the realm of energy economics, igniting new avenues for research and policy considerations. It just goes to show that when it comes to statistical exploration, the flames of knowledge can truly illuminate the path to understanding!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Brazil and US Annual Tax Revenue. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and About.Com .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9064749, r-squared of 0.8216967, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling Finances: Fossil Fuel Use in Brazil and US Annual Tax Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the relationship between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue. Leveraging data from the Energy Information Administration and About.Com, we aimed to shed light on this fiery topic. Our analysis revealed a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9064749 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. It seems that the burning questions surrounding this connection are heating up! Our findings indicate a strong positive association between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue, suggesting that as fossil fuel consumption in Brazil rises, so does US tax revenue. This connection between the two is truly gaseous, I mean, "gracious"! We discuss the implications of these findings and propose potential policy measures to further fuel the financial synergies between the two nations. Our research ignites a spark of curiosity, fueling further investigations into the interplay between fossil fuel use and tax revenue.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the global demand for energy continues to soar, the relationship between fossil fuel use and economic indicators has become a hot topic of debate. In particular, the connection between fossil fuel consumption in Brazil and US annual tax revenue has sparked interest among researchers and policymakers alike. It's like trying to determine if the fuel that powers our world also fuels our finances - a burning question indeed!
Speaking of burning, did you hear about the scientist who accidentally lit her research notes on fire? She claims it was an "unintended replication study"! Now, let's turn our attention to the scorching correlation between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US tax revenue.
The fluctuation in fossil fuel prices and consumption patterns has wide-reaching implications for economies worldwide, and the interplay between Brazil's fossil fuel use and US tax revenue is no exception. This relationship is akin to a well-oiled machine - when one part heats up, it can have cascading effects on the overall system. It's all about finding the perfect fuel-to-tax ratio, don't you think?
Our study aims to harness the power of statistical analysis to shed light on this fiery topic and add fuel to the existing literature on energy economics. Our findings are like striking gold in the world of data - they reveal a correlation coefficient that's hotter than a sizzling barbecue, and a p-value lower than a mole's basement. It seems that when it comes to the connection between fossil fuel consumption in Brazil and US tax revenue, the relationship is not just smokin', it's scorching!
It's like trying to find the optimal mix of fuel and flair, don't you agree? Our research ignites a spark of curiosity, fueling further investigations into the interplay between fossil fuel use and tax revenue. So, let's fire up the statistical engines and delve into the flaming connection between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

A scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9064749 and a sizzling r-squared of 0.8216967 were observed between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue for the period 1980 to 2021. This fiery relationship suggests that as fossil fuel consumption in Brazil blazes a trail, US tax revenue also catches fire. It's as if the two are burning with desire to be closely linked - talk about a heatwave of financial influence!

Our findings reveal a p-value less than 0.01, indicating that the likelihood of this association being a mere coincidence is as rare as finding a fossil fuel alternative that's both efficient and affordable. The results are truly flammable - meaning that the connection between these variables is hotter than a Bunsen burner turned up to max! It seems that when it comes to the financial impact of fossil fuel use, this relationship is not just heating up, it's positively smoldering.

Now, as Fig. 1 illustrates, the scatterplot showcases the strong positive association between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue. The data points are as closely packed as a school of sardines in a can, demonstrating the intense connection between these searing variables.

Our study has certainly uncovered a burning issue - it appears that the financial fortunes of the US are inextricably tied to the flames of Brazil's fossil fuel consumption. This relationship is as hot as a summer's day in the Amazon rainforest, and our research aims to fan the flames of curiosity, igniting further investigations into the glowing interplay between fossil fuel use and tax revenue.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Brazil and US Annual Tax Revenue. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Fueling Finances: Fossil Fuel Use in Brazil and US Annual Tax Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the relationship between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue. Leveraging data from the Energy Information Administration and About.Com, we aimed to shed light on this fiery topic. Our analysis revealed a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9064749 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. It seems that the burning questions surrounding this connection are heating up! Our findings indicate a strong positive association between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue, suggesting that as fossil fuel consumption in Brazil rises, so does US tax revenue. This connection between the two is truly gaseous, I mean, "gracious"! We discuss the implications of these findings and propose potential policy measures to further fuel the financial synergies between the two nations. Our research ignites a spark of curiosity, fueling further investigations into the interplay between fossil fuel use and tax revenue.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Prior investigations into the interplay between fossil fuel use and tax revenue have laid the foundation for our current inquiry. Smith et al. (2015) examined the relationship between fossil fuel consumption in various countries and their respective tax revenues, offering valuable insights into the potential fiscal impacts of energy use. Additionally, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the specifics of fossil fuel taxation and revenue generation in the context of international trade, shedding light on the complex dynamics at play.
Speaking of complex dynamics, did you hear about the scientist who turned himself into a pickle? He called himself "Dill Nye the Science Guy"! Now, let's rev up our engines and explore the sizzling connection between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue.
Further contributing to the discussion, "The Economics of Energy: What Went Wrong" by Thompson (2017) and "The Global Impact of Fossil Fuel Dependency" by White (2019) provide essential context for understanding the broader economic implications of fossil fuel consumption. These works offer a wealth of information and spark further interest in the flaming relationship between energy use and financial dynamics.
Looking at the fiction side of the spectrum, "The Fire Within: A Tale of Energy and Economics" by Redwood (fictional) captures the imagination with its fiery narrative and serves as a metaphorical kindling for our exploration of fossil fuel's financial flames. In a similar vein, "Burning Up the Balance Sheets: A Novel Approach to Economic Relations" by Ember (also fictional) presents a captivating account of the intersection between energy and economics, fueling our intellectual curiosity with its daring prose.
And as for our own approach to literature review, we spared no effort in ensuring a comprehensive analysis of existing research. In addition to scholarly sources, we ventured into uncharted territories, including the backs of shampoo bottles, where "Lather, Rinse, Repeat: A Tale of Tax and Toiletries" (completely made up) provided unexpected wisdom on the tax implications of personal hygiene. While not the most traditional source, it certainly added a touch of levity to our investigation.
In summary, the existing literature sets the stage for our exploration of the scorching correlation between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue. The combination of serious scholarship and playful curiosity creates a combustible mix that fuels our pursuit of knowledge in this fiery field. Let's stoke the flames of inquiry and dive into our own illuminating findings.

[[RESULTS]]
A scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9064749 and a sizzling r-squared of 0.8216967 were observed between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue for the period 1980 to 2021. This fiery relationship suggests that as fossil fuel consumption in Brazil blazes a trail, US tax revenue also catches fire. It's as if the two are burning with desire to be closely linked - talk about a heatwave of financial influence!
Our findings reveal a p-value less than 0.01, indicating that the likelihood of this association being a mere coincidence is as rare as finding a fossil fuel alternative that's both efficient and affordable. The results are truly flammable - meaning that the connection between these variables is hotter than a Bunsen burner turned up to max! It seems that when it comes to the financial impact of fossil fuel use, this relationship is not just heating up, it's positively smoldering.
Now, as Fig. 1 illustrates, the scatterplot showcases the strong positive association between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue. The data points are as closely packed as a school of sardines in a can, demonstrating the intense connection between these searing variables.
Our study has certainly uncovered a burning issue - it appears that the financial fortunes of the US are inextricably tied to the flames of Brazil's fossil fuel consumption. This relationship is as hot as a summer's day in the Amazon rainforest, and our research aims to fan the flames of curiosity, igniting further investigations into the glowing interplay between fossil fuel use and tax revenue.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation into the connection between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue has unearthed a scorching association, confirming the findings of previous research on the topic. Our results align with the work of Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018), providing empirical support for the fiery relationship between energy consumption and fiscal inflow. It's as if this association is so hot, even the most distinguished scientists would be fired up by the statistical significance - talk about sparking interest on a global scale!

The substantial correlation coefficient and r-squared value not only reinforce the robustness of the relationship but also lend credence to the idea that these variables are truly in the same hot air balloon. It's like finding the perfect blend of fuel and oxygen for a scientific experiment - a match made in statistical heaven! Our results substantiate the notion that as fossil fuel use in Brazil blazes a trail, US tax revenue is stoked to follow suit, creating a financial bonfire that's as captivating as a great campfire ghost story!

Our findings suggest a level of interconnectedness that is as undeniable as the force of gravity - it's as if Brazil's fossil fuel use and US tax revenue are cosmically bound in a gravitational dance of financial influence. The p-value, much like a rare gem found amidst the statistical rubble, further solidifies the significance of this relationship. This association is not just a statistical blip; it's a statistical blaze, burning brighter than a supernova in the fiscal cosmos!

The scatterplot visually portrays the close proximity of the data points, implying a tight-knit connection that's as snug as a bug in a rug - it's clear that these variables are inseparable, like two peas in a highly combustible pod. The robustness and consistency of our findings fan the flames of curiosity and pave the way for future investigations into the economic alchemy that occurs when these searing variables collide.

In conclusion, our research adds fuel to the fiery debate surrounding the relationship between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue. Our results set the stage for a deeper understanding of the financial interplay between these variables, igniting a fervent interest in further inquiries and policy measures to stoke the flames of financial synergy. After all, understanding these financial dynamics is no trivial pursuit - it's a blaze of statistical glory!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Brazil and US Annual Tax Revenue. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Fueling Finances: Fossil Fuel Use in Brazil and US Annual Tax Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the relationship between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue. Leveraging data from the Energy Information Administration and About.Com, we aimed to shed light on this fiery topic. Our analysis revealed a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9064749 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. It seems that the burning questions surrounding this connection are heating up! Our findings indicate a strong positive association between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue, suggesting that as fossil fuel consumption in Brazil rises, so does US tax revenue. This connection between the two is truly gaseous, I mean, "gracious"! We discuss the implications of these findings and propose potential policy measures to further fuel the financial synergies between the two nations. Our research ignites a spark of curiosity, fueling further investigations into the interplay between fossil fuel use and tax revenue.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the global demand for energy continues to soar, the relationship between fossil fuel use and economic indicators has become a hot topic of debate. In particular, the connection between fossil fuel consumption in Brazil and US annual tax revenue has sparked interest among researchers and policymakers alike. It's like trying to determine if the fuel that powers our world also fuels our finances - a burning question indeed!
Speaking of burning, did you hear about the scientist who accidentally lit her research notes on fire? She claims it was an "unintended replication study"! Now, let's turn our attention to the scorching correlation between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US tax revenue.
The fluctuation in fossil fuel prices and consumption patterns has wide-reaching implications for economies worldwide, and the interplay between Brazil's fossil fuel use and US tax revenue is no exception. This relationship is akin to a well-oiled machine - when one part heats up, it can have cascading effects on the overall system. It's all about finding the perfect fuel-to-tax ratio, don't you think?
Our study aims to harness the power of statistical analysis to shed light on this fiery topic and add fuel to the existing literature on energy economics. Our findings are like striking gold in the world of data - they reveal a correlation coefficient that's hotter than a sizzling barbecue, and a p-value lower than a mole's basement. It seems that when it comes to the connection between fossil fuel consumption in Brazil and US tax revenue, the relationship is not just smokin', it's scorching!
It's like trying to find the optimal mix of fuel and flair, don't you agree? Our research ignites a spark of curiosity, fueling further investigations into the interplay between fossil fuel use and tax revenue. So, let's fire up the statistical engines and delve into the flaming connection between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue!

[[RESULTS]]
A scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9064749 and a sizzling r-squared of 0.8216967 were observed between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue for the period 1980 to 2021. This fiery relationship suggests that as fossil fuel consumption in Brazil blazes a trail, US tax revenue also catches fire. It's as if the two are burning with desire to be closely linked - talk about a heatwave of financial influence!
Our findings reveal a p-value less than 0.01, indicating that the likelihood of this association being a mere coincidence is as rare as finding a fossil fuel alternative that's both efficient and affordable. The results are truly flammable - meaning that the connection between these variables is hotter than a Bunsen burner turned up to max! It seems that when it comes to the financial impact of fossil fuel use, this relationship is not just heating up, it's positively smoldering.
Now, as Fig. 1 illustrates, the scatterplot showcases the strong positive association between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue. The data points are as closely packed as a school of sardines in a can, demonstrating the intense connection between these searing variables.
Our study has certainly uncovered a burning issue - it appears that the financial fortunes of the US are inextricably tied to the flames of Brazil's fossil fuel consumption. This relationship is as hot as a summer's day in the Amazon rainforest, and our research aims to fan the flames of curiosity, igniting further investigations into the glowing interplay between fossil fuel use and tax revenue.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our scorching findings have brought to light the flaming connection between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue. It seems that as Brazil's fossil fuel consumption blazes a trail, US tax revenue catches fire! It's like they're in a bonfire of financial synergy. As the great scientist once said, "Where there's smoke, there's statistical fire!"

The strong positive association between these variables is as clear as day - it's like trying to deny the existence of gravity; the evidence is just too weighty! The likelihood of this association being a mere coincidence is rarer than a steak at a vegan potluck. Our findings are truly incendiary – they've sparked a lot of interest in the field of energy economics.

Now, onto the joke part: Did you hear about the statistician who got a job because of her outstanding performance in data analysis? You could say she really nailed the "probabili-tees"! Speaking of nails, it's like we've hit the nail on the head with this research, uncovering a connection hotter than a jalapeño in a furnace!

In light of our findings, it's safe to say that further research in this area is as unnecessary as a solar-powered flashlight. We've shed enough light on this fiery topic to keep the curiosity glowing for generations to come. No more research is needed, unless someone wants to see if the connection between fossil fuel use and tax revenue is as strong as the gravitational pull of dad jokes at a family gathering!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fueling Finances: Fossil Fuel Use in Brazil and US Annual Tax Revenue. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Energy Economics and Environmental Policy


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fueling Finances: Fossil Fuel Use in Brazil and US Annual Tax Revenue. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Sustainable Energy and Economic Development


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fueling Finances: Fossil Fuel Use in Brazil and US Annual Tax Revenue with an abstract of This study investigates the relationship between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue. Leveraging data from the Energy Information Administration and About.Com, we aimed to shed light on this fiery topic. Our analysis revealed a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9064749 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021. It seems that the burning questions surrounding this connection are heating up! Our findings indicate a strong positive association between fossil fuel use in Brazil and US annual tax revenue, suggesting that as fossil fuel consumption in Brazil rises, so does US tax revenue. This connection between the two is truly gaseous, I mean, "gracious"! We discuss the implications of these findings and propose potential policy measures to further fuel the financial synergies between the two nations. Our research ignites a spark of curiosity, fueling further investigations into the interplay between fossil fuel use and tax revenue.

ChatGPT:

fossil fuel use, tax revenue, Brazil, US, correlation coefficient, Energy Information Administration, fossil fuel consumption, policy measures, financial synergies

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Fossil fuel use in Brazil
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in Brazil in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in Brazil

US Annual Tax Revenue
Source: About.Com
See what else correlates with US Annual Tax Revenue

Correlation r = 0.9064749 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8216967 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., US Annual Tax Revenue) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Fossil fuel use in Brazil) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.5E-16. 0.0000000000000001451473559352
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 1.5E-14% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 6,889,550,233,670,414 random variables You don't actually need 6 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.83, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Fossil fuel use in Brazil (Billion kWh)7.9438.71857.965567.217327.39788.1140815.224212.15710.940710.81569.5165610.46511.168111.163411.177512.843215.482717.699318.620527.473428.428434.687932.946130.980539.455638.758138.664136.591454.953335.523560.045349.133875.8336110.298134.657126.93890.863599.586384.447488.686978.967145.386
US Annual Tax Revenue (Trillions of Dollars)0.5170.5990.6180.6010.6660.7340.7690.8540.9090.9911.031.051.091.151.261.351.451.581.721.822.031.991.851.721.882.152.42.572.522.12.162.32.452.783.023.253.273.323.333.463.424.05




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7.943,8.7185,7.96556,7.21732,7.3978,8.11408,15.2242,12.157,10.9407,10.8156,9.51656,10.465,11.1681,11.1634,11.1775,12.8432,15.4827,17.6993,18.6205,27.4734,28.4284,34.6879,32.9461,30.9805,39.4556,38.7581,38.6641,36.5914,54.9533,35.5235,60.0453,49.1338,75.8336,110.298,134.657,126.938,90.8635,99.5863,84.4474,88.6869,78.967,145.386,])
array_2 = np.array([0.517,0.599,0.618,0.601,0.666,0.734,0.769,0.854,0.909,0.991,1.03,1.05,1.09,1.15,1.26,1.35,1.45,1.58,1.72,1.82,2.03,1.99,1.85,1.72,1.88,2.15,2.4,2.57,2.52,2.1,2.16,2.3,2.45,2.78,3.02,3.25,3.27,3.32,3.33,3.46,3.42,4.05,])
array_1_name = "Fossil fuel use in Brazil"
array_2_name = "US Annual Tax Revenue"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 2111 · Black Variable ID: 23537 · Red Variable ID: 507
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0