about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,103 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and the second variable is Tesla's stock price (TSLA).  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The smog in Sioux City created a higher demand for electric cars, leading to a spike in interest and purchases of Tesla vehicles. As more people sought environmentally friendly transportation options, Tesla's stock price soared, proving that even pollution has a way of inadvertently promoting clean energy!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image with the style of a Discovery magazine cover. The scene depicts a hazy Sioux City, Iowa skyline with people wearing masks and walking the streets. In the background, a digital stock ticker displays Tesla's plunging stock price against the backdrop of polluted air. The focus should be on the contrast between the polluted city and the declining stock price within the hazy urban environment. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Poor air quality in Sioux City, Iowa and Tesla's stock price. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Vaporwave Glitch art Cute cartoon Surrealism A Discovery magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Poor air quality in Sioux City, Iowa and Tesla's stock price together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Sioux City, Iowa, a hazy skyline looms over the city as people walk the streets wearing masks. Meanwhile, on a digital stock ticker, Tesla's stock price is shown plunging down amid the backdrop of the polluted air.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In Sioux City, Iowa, a hazy skyline looms over the city as people walk the streets wearing masks. Meanwhile, on a digital stock ticker, Tesla's stock price is shown plunging down amid the backdrop of the polluted air. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image with the style of a Discovery magazine cover. The scene depicts a hazy Sioux City, Iowa skyline with people wearing masks and walking the streets. In the background, a digital stock ticker displays Tesla's plunging stock price against the backdrop of polluted air. The focus should be on the contrast between the polluted city and the declining stock price within the hazy urban environment.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa caused Tesla's stock price (TSLA) to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Air Pollution in Sioux City: A Shock to Tesla's Stock?

Journal of Environmental Economics and Electric Car Innovation

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Tesla's stock price (TSLA). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9922663 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Air Pollution in Sioux City: A Shock to Tesla's Stock?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the electrifying relationship between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the stock price of Tesla (TSLA). Combining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to unravel whether Sioux City's air quality woes have been silently "charging up" Tesla's stock performance. Our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9922663 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings may jolt the belief that environmental factors and stock prices are unrelated, providing a breath of fresh air to econometric enthusiasts and pun aficionados alike.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Tesla's stock price (TSLA). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Pollution in Sioux City: A Shock to Tesla's Stock?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the electrifying relationship between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the stock price of Tesla (TSLA). Combining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to unravel whether Sioux City's air quality woes have been silently "charging up" Tesla's stock performance. Our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9922663 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings may jolt the belief that environmental factors and stock prices are unrelated, providing a breath of fresh air to econometric enthusiasts and pun aficionados alike.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In recent years, the link between environmental factors and financial markets has gained increasing attention, sparking interest among scholars, investors, and nature enthusiasts alike. This study delves into the peculiar relationship between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the stock price of Tesla (TSLA). It aims to shed light on whether the atmospheric woes of Sioux City have silently energized or deflated the performance of Tesla's stock, sending shockwaves through the realm of econometrics and environmental economics.

The synergy between environmental indicators and stock prices has long been a topic of intrigue. Whether it's the smokescreens of industrial emissions or the ethereal whispers of a pristine countryside, the influence of environmental conditions on financial markets has been under scrutiny. Amidst this backdrop, our investigation seeks to inject a breath of fresh air into the staid corridors of financial analysis, without neglecting the inherent playfulness of the topic.

Sioux City, Iowa, with its rich history and charming Midwestern appeal, has found itself at the center of our inquiry. Known for its blend of urban bustle and easygoing charm, Sioux City carries with it the weight of environmental challenges, particularly concerning air quality. Whether it's the ethereal murmur of exhaust fumes from a tractor-trailer or the peaceful rustle of a cornfield in the wind, Sioux City provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation.

On the other side of the coin, we have Tesla, the charismatic darling of the electric vehicle sector, renowned for its innovative prowess and polarizing stock performance. As an icon of sustainable technology, Tesla's stock price reflects not just the ebb and flow of market sentiment, but also the intangible currents of environmental consciousness and regulatory winds. It is against this vibrant canvas that we seek to debunk, illuminate, and entertain with regards to the relationship between air pollution in Sioux City and Tesla's stock performance.

Our findings may well be a startling shock to traditional economic thought, adding a charming zing and sparking "current" discussions in both financial and environmental circles. With the grounding of theoretical underpinnings and the vibrancy of empirical evidence, this study promises to offer a fascinating journey through the "electrifying" interconnectedness of seemingly disparate realms of study.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Tesla's stock price (TSLA). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Pollution in Sioux City: A Shock to Tesla's Stock?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the electrifying relationship between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the stock price of Tesla (TSLA). Combining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to unravel whether Sioux City's air quality woes have been silently "charging up" Tesla's stock performance. Our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9922663 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings may jolt the belief that environmental factors and stock prices are unrelated, providing a breath of fresh air to econometric enthusiasts and pun aficionados alike.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In recent years, the link between environmental factors and financial markets has gained increasing attention, sparking interest among scholars, investors, and nature enthusiasts alike. This study delves into the peculiar relationship between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the stock price of Tesla (TSLA). It aims to shed light on whether the atmospheric woes of Sioux City have silently energized or deflated the performance of Tesla's stock, sending shockwaves through the realm of econometrics and environmental economics.
The synergy between environmental indicators and stock prices has long been a topic of intrigue. Whether it's the smokescreens of industrial emissions or the ethereal whispers of a pristine countryside, the influence of environmental conditions on financial markets has been under scrutiny. Amidst this backdrop, our investigation seeks to inject a breath of fresh air into the staid corridors of financial analysis, without neglecting the inherent playfulness of the topic.
Sioux City, Iowa, with its rich history and charming Midwestern appeal, has found itself at the center of our inquiry. Known for its blend of urban bustle and easygoing charm, Sioux City carries with it the weight of environmental challenges, particularly concerning air quality. Whether it's the ethereal murmur of exhaust fumes from a tractor-trailer or the peaceful rustle of a cornfield in the wind, Sioux City provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation.
On the other side of the coin, we have Tesla, the charismatic darling of the electric vehicle sector, renowned for its innovative prowess and polarizing stock performance. As an icon of sustainable technology, Tesla's stock price reflects not just the ebb and flow of market sentiment, but also the intangible currents of environmental consciousness and regulatory winds. It is against this vibrant canvas that we seek to debunk, illuminate, and entertain with regards to the relationship between air pollution in Sioux City and Tesla's stock performance.
Our findings may well be a startling shock to traditional economic thought, adding a charming zing and sparking "current" discussions in both financial and environmental circles. With the grounding of theoretical underpinnings and the vibrancy of empirical evidence, this study promises to offer a fascinating journey through the "electrifying" interconnectedness of seemingly disparate realms of study.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The realm of literature on the intersections of environmental variables and stock prices embarks on a serious note, with seminal works by Smith (2015), Doe (2018), and Jones (2020) laying the groundwork for further inquiry into the electrifying interplay between air pollution and financial markets. These foundational studies delve into the intricate dynamics of environmental factors and stock price movements, encapsulating the gravity of their impact and the depth of their interrelations.

Venturing into the domain of non-fiction literature, titles such as "The Economics of Pollution" by White (2017), "Environmental Influences on Financial Markets" by Green (2019), and "Tesla: A Conduit for Change" by Grey (2020) provide valuable insights into the serious underpinnings of our investigation. However, in the spirit of unraveling the unexpected connections in the world, we draw inspiration from the realm of fictional works, where "The Shock of Pollution" by Sparks (2018), "Battery Dreams: Tales of Electrified Stocks" by Volt (2021), and "The Tesla Effect: Jolts and Joules in the Market" by Sparkle (2019) transport us into a realm of whimsy and speculation.

Adding an electrifying twist to the endeavor, we step into the world of cartoons and children's shows, where the likes of "Captain Planet and the Planeteers," "The Magic School Bus: Air Pollution Adventure," and "The Adventures of Smog-Man" playfully echo the themes that have captured our scholarly curiosity. In this juxtaposition of serious scholarship and playful musings, we aim to weave a narrative that not only enlightens the mind but also tickles the fancy, electrifying the pursuit of knowledge with a jolt of humor and delight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Tesla's stock price (TSLA). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Pollution in Sioux City: A Shock to Tesla's Stock?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the electrifying relationship between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the stock price of Tesla (TSLA). Combining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to unravel whether Sioux City's air quality woes have been silently "charging up" Tesla's stock performance. Our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9922663 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings may jolt the belief that environmental factors and stock prices are unrelated, providing a breath of fresh air to econometric enthusiasts and pun aficionados alike.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In recent years, the link between environmental factors and financial markets has gained increasing attention, sparking interest among scholars, investors, and nature enthusiasts alike. This study delves into the peculiar relationship between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the stock price of Tesla (TSLA). It aims to shed light on whether the atmospheric woes of Sioux City have silently energized or deflated the performance of Tesla's stock, sending shockwaves through the realm of econometrics and environmental economics.
The synergy between environmental indicators and stock prices has long been a topic of intrigue. Whether it's the smokescreens of industrial emissions or the ethereal whispers of a pristine countryside, the influence of environmental conditions on financial markets has been under scrutiny. Amidst this backdrop, our investigation seeks to inject a breath of fresh air into the staid corridors of financial analysis, without neglecting the inherent playfulness of the topic.
Sioux City, Iowa, with its rich history and charming Midwestern appeal, has found itself at the center of our inquiry. Known for its blend of urban bustle and easygoing charm, Sioux City carries with it the weight of environmental challenges, particularly concerning air quality. Whether it's the ethereal murmur of exhaust fumes from a tractor-trailer or the peaceful rustle of a cornfield in the wind, Sioux City provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation.
On the other side of the coin, we have Tesla, the charismatic darling of the electric vehicle sector, renowned for its innovative prowess and polarizing stock performance. As an icon of sustainable technology, Tesla's stock price reflects not just the ebb and flow of market sentiment, but also the intangible currents of environmental consciousness and regulatory winds. It is against this vibrant canvas that we seek to debunk, illuminate, and entertain with regards to the relationship between air pollution in Sioux City and Tesla's stock performance.
Our findings may well be a startling shock to traditional economic thought, adding a charming zing and sparking "current" discussions in both financial and environmental circles. With the grounding of theoretical underpinnings and the vibrancy of empirical evidence, this study promises to offer a fascinating journey through the "electrifying" interconnectedness of seemingly disparate realms of study.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Our methodology was as rigorous as it was entertaining, much like a tightrope walker balancing between the realms of quantitative analysis and whimsical curiosity. We employed a time-series design to examine the impact of air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, on the stock price of Tesla (TSLA) from 2011 to 2021. Our data, sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), was as pristine as a freshly washed electric car, ensuring the reliability and validity of our analysis.

To measure air pollution in Sioux City, we utilized air quality indices, particulate matter concentrations, and other environmental metrics that make statistical analyses “breathe a little easier.” These data were collected from monitoring stations scattered like breadcrumbs across Sioux City, providing a comprehensive picture of the city’s atmospheric conditions. As for Tesla's stock price, we turned to the digital hearths of market data, carefully tracking TSLA's daily closing prices and incorporating them into our electrifying investigation.

To establish the relationship between air pollution and Tesla's stock performance, we employed various statistical techniques, including time-series modeling, regression analysis, and correlation studies. Our models were as meticulously crafted as a Tesla electric car, with each variable and coefficient impeccably placed to illuminate the interconnectedness of the environmental and financial worlds.

In addition, we employed sophisticated techniques to control for potential confounding variables, including market dynamics, industry trends, and meteorological factors. As we sifted through the data, we ensured that our analysis was as pristine and transparent as the air that would emerge from a zero-emission vehicle.

Furthermore, our analysis encompassed the consideration of potential non-linear relationships, understanding that the dynamics of stock market reactions and environmental influences are as complex and enigmatic as a Tesla autopilot system. Through robust sensitivity analyses and diagnostic checks, we sought to ensure that our findings weren't merely sparks in the pan but enduring insights into the evolving relationship between environmental conditions and financial markets.

In summary, our methodology was not a mere drive through the backstreets of statistical analysis but an exhilarating journey across the intersecting highways of environmental economics and financial econometrics. Its intricacy and robustness are the tire tracks left behind by a high-performing electric vehicle, paving the way for future research to continue unraveling the mystique of this electrifying relationship.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Tesla's stock price (TSLA). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9922663, r-squared of 0.9845924, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Pollution in Sioux City: A Shock to Tesla's Stock?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the electrifying relationship between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the stock price of Tesla (TSLA). Combining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to unravel whether Sioux City's air quality woes have been silently "charging up" Tesla's stock performance. Our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9922663 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings may jolt the belief that environmental factors and stock prices are unrelated, providing a breath of fresh air to econometric enthusiasts and pun aficionados alike.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In recent years, the link between environmental factors and financial markets has gained increasing attention, sparking interest among scholars, investors, and nature enthusiasts alike. This study delves into the peculiar relationship between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the stock price of Tesla (TSLA). It aims to shed light on whether the atmospheric woes of Sioux City have silently energized or deflated the performance of Tesla's stock, sending shockwaves through the realm of econometrics and environmental economics.
The synergy between environmental indicators and stock prices has long been a topic of intrigue. Whether it's the smokescreens of industrial emissions or the ethereal whispers of a pristine countryside, the influence of environmental conditions on financial markets has been under scrutiny. Amidst this backdrop, our investigation seeks to inject a breath of fresh air into the staid corridors of financial analysis, without neglecting the inherent playfulness of the topic.
Sioux City, Iowa, with its rich history and charming Midwestern appeal, has found itself at the center of our inquiry. Known for its blend of urban bustle and easygoing charm, Sioux City carries with it the weight of environmental challenges, particularly concerning air quality. Whether it's the ethereal murmur of exhaust fumes from a tractor-trailer or the peaceful rustle of a cornfield in the wind, Sioux City provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation.
On the other side of the coin, we have Tesla, the charismatic darling of the electric vehicle sector, renowned for its innovative prowess and polarizing stock performance. As an icon of sustainable technology, Tesla's stock price reflects not just the ebb and flow of market sentiment, but also the intangible currents of environmental consciousness and regulatory winds. It is against this vibrant canvas that we seek to debunk, illuminate, and entertain with regards to the relationship between air pollution in Sioux City and Tesla's stock performance.
Our findings may well be a startling shock to traditional economic thought, adding a charming zing and sparking "current" discussions in both financial and environmental circles. With the grounding of theoretical underpinnings and the vibrancy of empirical evidence, this study promises to offer a fascinating journey through the "electrifying" interconnectedness of seemingly disparate realms of study.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the potential electrifying relationship between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the stock price of Tesla (TSLA) has yielded some shockingly eye-opening results. Analyzing data from 2011 to 2021, we found a positively charged correlation coefficient of 0.9922663, signaling a remarkably strong relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.9845924 indicates that a substantial proportion of the variability in Tesla's stock price can be attributed to changes in air pollution levels in Sioux City.

To put it simply, the correlation between air pollution in Sioux City and Tesla's stock price is as strong as the power output of a fully charged Tesla Model S! The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this relationship, leaving little room for doubt that there is indeed something in the air impacting Tesla's stock performance.

Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating this electrifying correlation, which is as clear as day... or as clear as the sky over Sioux City on a particularly smoggy day, if you prefer a more atmospheric analogy.

These findings are certainly nothing to sneeze at, leading us to question whether the environmental woes of Sioux City have been silently "charging up" Tesla's stock, or if it's just a mere coincidence, creating a buzz within the realms of econometrics and environmental economics. While we can't conclusively say whether the stock price is "polluted" by the air quality in Sioux City, our results are undeniably captivating and should be considered with a breath of fresh air, even if that air happens to contain a bit of particulate matter.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Tesla's stock price (TSLA). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Air Pollution in Sioux City: A Shock to Tesla's Stock?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the electrifying relationship between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the stock price of Tesla (TSLA). Combining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to unravel whether Sioux City's air quality woes have been silently "charging up" Tesla's stock performance. Our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9922663 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings may jolt the belief that environmental factors and stock prices are unrelated, providing a breath of fresh air to econometric enthusiasts and pun aficionados alike.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The realm of literature on the intersections of environmental variables and stock prices embarks on a serious note, with seminal works by Smith (2015), Doe (2018), and Jones (2020) laying the groundwork for further inquiry into the electrifying interplay between air pollution and financial markets. These foundational studies delve into the intricate dynamics of environmental factors and stock price movements, encapsulating the gravity of their impact and the depth of their interrelations.
Venturing into the domain of non-fiction literature, titles such as "The Economics of Pollution" by White (2017), "Environmental Influences on Financial Markets" by Green (2019), and "Tesla: A Conduit for Change" by Grey (2020) provide valuable insights into the serious underpinnings of our investigation. However, in the spirit of unraveling the unexpected connections in the world, we draw inspiration from the realm of fictional works, where "The Shock of Pollution" by Sparks (2018), "Battery Dreams: Tales of Electrified Stocks" by Volt (2021), and "The Tesla Effect: Jolts and Joules in the Market" by Sparkle (2019) transport us into a realm of whimsy and speculation.
Adding an electrifying twist to the endeavor, we step into the world of cartoons and children's shows, where the likes of "Captain Planet and the Planeteers," "The Magic School Bus: Air Pollution Adventure," and "The Adventures of Smog-Man" playfully echo the themes that have captured our scholarly curiosity. In this juxtaposition of serious scholarship and playful musings, we aim to weave a narrative that not only enlightens the mind but also tickles the fancy, electrifying the pursuit of knowledge with a jolt of humor and delight.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the potential electrifying relationship between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the stock price of Tesla (TSLA) has yielded some shockingly eye-opening results. Analyzing data from 2011 to 2021, we found a positively charged correlation coefficient of 0.9922663, signaling a remarkably strong relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.9845924 indicates that a substantial proportion of the variability in Tesla's stock price can be attributed to changes in air pollution levels in Sioux City.
To put it simply, the correlation between air pollution in Sioux City and Tesla's stock price is as strong as the power output of a fully charged Tesla Model S! The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this relationship, leaving little room for doubt that there is indeed something in the air impacting Tesla's stock performance.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating this electrifying correlation, which is as clear as day... or as clear as the sky over Sioux City on a particularly smoggy day, if you prefer a more atmospheric analogy.
These findings are certainly nothing to sneeze at, leading us to question whether the environmental woes of Sioux City have been silently "charging up" Tesla's stock, or if it's just a mere coincidence, creating a buzz within the realms of econometrics and environmental economics. While we can't conclusively say whether the stock price is "polluted" by the air quality in Sioux City, our results are undeniably captivating and should be considered with a breath of fresh air, even if that air happens to contain a bit of particulate matter.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The electrifying results of our study have sparked a lively debate about the potential shocks and volts that may be influencing Tesla's stock price. Our findings support the existing literature, skirting the serious and whimsical alike, that has suggested a link between environmental factors and financial markets. While we initially approached this investigation with a lighthearted wink at the unexpected connections in the world, our results have lent a powerful jolt of credibility to the notion that air pollution in Sioux City may indeed be charging up Tesla's stock performance.

Returning to the fictional and playful underpinnings that inspired our inquiry, we cannot help but marvel at the striking resemblance between our findings and the speculative musings of "Battery Dreams: Tales of Electrified Stocks" by Volt (2021), which often tread the fine line between imagination and financial plausibility. Our results not only echo the speculative sparks within these fictional tales but also ground them in a statistical reality with a vibrant zing. In the spirited realm of playful musings, this electrifying correlation between air pollution and Tesla's stock price is akin to a plot twist in a thrilling sci-fi novel—one that leaves readers simultaneously bemused and captivated.

Moreover, our results align with the more serious scholarship that has painstakingly documented the entwined fate of environmental variables and financial markets. The substantial r-squared value in our analysis reinforces the gravity of this connection, akin to a gravity-defying twirl in a serious ballet performance. It suggests that changes in air pollution levels in Sioux City can account for a substantial proportion of the twists and turns in Tesla's stock price, lending credence to the notion that environmental considerations are indeed a breath of fresh air in the realm of stock market analysis.

In the spirit of playful speculation and statistical rigor, we find our investigation straddling the lines between imagination and reality, much like a high-wire act in the circus. While we cannot definitively label this relationship as causal—or causally electrifying, in keeping with our theme—our results certainly provide an enigmatic spark that ignites further inquiry into the curious dance between air quality and stock prices. With a twinkle in our eyes and a sprinkling of statistical fairy dust, we invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts to join us in this exciting quest to unravel the unexpected connections that infuse the world of econometrics with a shockingly delightful jolt of wonder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa and Tesla's stock price (TSLA). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Air Pollution in Sioux City: A Shock to Tesla's Stock?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the electrifying relationship between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the stock price of Tesla (TSLA). Combining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to unravel whether Sioux City's air quality woes have been silently "charging up" Tesla's stock performance. Our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9922663 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings may jolt the belief that environmental factors and stock prices are unrelated, providing a breath of fresh air to econometric enthusiasts and pun aficionados alike.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In recent years, the link between environmental factors and financial markets has gained increasing attention, sparking interest among scholars, investors, and nature enthusiasts alike. This study delves into the peculiar relationship between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the stock price of Tesla (TSLA). It aims to shed light on whether the atmospheric woes of Sioux City have silently energized or deflated the performance of Tesla's stock, sending shockwaves through the realm of econometrics and environmental economics.
The synergy between environmental indicators and stock prices has long been a topic of intrigue. Whether it's the smokescreens of industrial emissions or the ethereal whispers of a pristine countryside, the influence of environmental conditions on financial markets has been under scrutiny. Amidst this backdrop, our investigation seeks to inject a breath of fresh air into the staid corridors of financial analysis, without neglecting the inherent playfulness of the topic.
Sioux City, Iowa, with its rich history and charming Midwestern appeal, has found itself at the center of our inquiry. Known for its blend of urban bustle and easygoing charm, Sioux City carries with it the weight of environmental challenges, particularly concerning air quality. Whether it's the ethereal murmur of exhaust fumes from a tractor-trailer or the peaceful rustle of a cornfield in the wind, Sioux City provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation.
On the other side of the coin, we have Tesla, the charismatic darling of the electric vehicle sector, renowned for its innovative prowess and polarizing stock performance. As an icon of sustainable technology, Tesla's stock price reflects not just the ebb and flow of market sentiment, but also the intangible currents of environmental consciousness and regulatory winds. It is against this vibrant canvas that we seek to debunk, illuminate, and entertain with regards to the relationship between air pollution in Sioux City and Tesla's stock performance.
Our findings may well be a startling shock to traditional economic thought, adding a charming zing and sparking "current" discussions in both financial and environmental circles. With the grounding of theoretical underpinnings and the vibrancy of empirical evidence, this study promises to offer a fascinating journey through the "electrifying" interconnectedness of seemingly disparate realms of study.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the potential electrifying relationship between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the stock price of Tesla (TSLA) has yielded some shockingly eye-opening results. Analyzing data from 2011 to 2021, we found a positively charged correlation coefficient of 0.9922663, signaling a remarkably strong relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.9845924 indicates that a substantial proportion of the variability in Tesla's stock price can be attributed to changes in air pollution levels in Sioux City.
To put it simply, the correlation between air pollution in Sioux City and Tesla's stock price is as strong as the power output of a fully charged Tesla Model S! The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this relationship, leaving little room for doubt that there is indeed something in the air impacting Tesla's stock performance.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating this electrifying correlation, which is as clear as day... or as clear as the sky over Sioux City on a particularly smoggy day, if you prefer a more atmospheric analogy.
These findings are certainly nothing to sneeze at, leading us to question whether the environmental woes of Sioux City have been silently "charging up" Tesla's stock, or if it's just a mere coincidence, creating a buzz within the realms of econometrics and environmental economics. While we can't conclusively say whether the stock price is "polluted" by the air quality in Sioux City, our results are undeniably captivating and should be considered with a breath of fresh air, even if that air happens to contain a bit of particulate matter.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has shed light on the electrifying relationship between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the stock price of Tesla (TSLA). The shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9922663 and the p-value of less than 0.01 provide compelling evidence of a strong association between these disparate factors. It seems that the atmospheric woes of Sioux City have indeed been silently "charging up" Tesla's stock performance, leaving investors and environmental enthusiasts alike breathless with amazement.

The implications of these findings are as clear and striking as a bolt of lightning on a stormy day. It's tempting to say that Tesla's stock performance has been "polluted" by the air quality in Sioux City, but we must also acknowledge the possibility of other confounding factors at play. Nevertheless, these results have certainly sparked lively discussions in the realms of econometrics and environmental economics, injecting a much-needed jolt of excitement into these areas of study.

While we have electrifyingly illuminated the connection between air pollution in Sioux City and Tesla's stock price, with findings as strong as the power output of a fully charged Tesla Model S, it's important to acknowledge the limitations of our study. The dynamic nature of financial markets and the complexity of environmental influences warrant caution in drawing definitive conclusions.

But fear not, for this study has certainly charged up the debate on the interplay between environmental factors and stock prices. With a bit of statistical electric humor and a healthy dose of empirical insight, we have ventured into uncharted territory, illuminating the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

In the spirit of transparency, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. The shocking results of this study have provided a satisfying jolt of knowledge, leaving little room for doubt about the captivating connection between air pollution in Sioux City and Tesla's stock performance. It's safe to say that we have sparked enough puns and "current" discussions to power a small town, so let this research stand as a testament to the electrifying allure of empirical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Air Pollution in Sioux City: A Shock to Tesla's Stock?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Environmental Economics and Electric Car Innovation


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Air Pollution in Sioux City: A Shock to Tesla's Stock?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Electromagnetic Ecology and Urban Air Quality


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Air Pollution in Sioux City: A Shock to Tesla's Stock? with an abstract of This paper explores the electrifying relationship between air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa, and the stock price of Tesla (TSLA). Combining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to unravel whether Sioux City's air quality woes have been silently "charging up" Tesla's stock performance. Our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9922663 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings may jolt the belief that environmental factors and stock prices are unrelated, providing a breath of fresh air to econometric enthusiasts and pun aficionados alike.

ChatGPT:

Air Pollution, Sioux City, Iowa, Tesla Stock Performance, TSLA Stock, Environmental Protection Agency Data, LSEG Analytics Data, Air Quality, Stock Price Correlation, Stock Performance, Environmental Factors, Stock Prices, Econometric Analysis, Sioux City Air Quality, Tesla Stock, Air Pollution Impact on Stock Prices

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Sioux City, IA-NE-SD
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa

Tesla's stock price (TSLA)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Tesla (TSLA) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Tesla's stock price (TSLA)

Correlation r = 0.9922663 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9845924 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 98.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Tesla's stock price (TSLA)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.8E-9. 0.0000000018211121853480973000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 1.8E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 549,114,990 random variables You don't actually need 549 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.97, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa (Bad air quality days)00000000000.660066
Tesla's stock price (TSLA) (Stock price)1.791.932.339.9914.8615.3814.3220.820.4128.3239.82




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.660066,])
array_2 = np.array([1.79,1.93,2.33,9.99,14.86,15.38,14.32,20.8,20.41,28.3,239.82,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Sioux City, Iowa"
array_2_name = "Tesla's stock price (TSLA)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 2103 · Black Variable ID: 21264 · Red Variable ID: 1545
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0