about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,057 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Wichita and the second variable is xkcd comics published about politics.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2016, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The higher levels of smog acted as a creative catalyst for political satire, leading to an uptick in politically themed xkcd comics. As the pollution particles wafted through the city, they inadvertently sparked a chain reaction of comedic inspiration in the brains of the cartoonists, ultimately shaping the content of the comics. Who would have thought that dirty air could lead to clean humor about dirty politics? It’s like the atmosphere was saying, “I may be hazy, but let me clear the way for some politically charged laughter!”

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a cyber folk gathering in Wichita, with a low-hanging haze creating an ethereal atmosphere. In the center, a group of people are gathered around a glowing holographic display showing an xkcd comic about politics. The scene is lit by neon lights, with digital artwork and futuristic elements blending seamlessly with the urban landscape. The people are depicted in a mix of retro and futuristic fashion, adding to the cyber folk aesthetic. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Poor air quality in Wichita and xkcd comics published about politics. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: inspired by bauhaus Low poly Whimsical illustration Cyber folk Cyber folk
ChatGPT: Cyber folk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Poor air quality in Wichita and xkcd comics published about politics together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Wichita, a haze hangs low in the sky, making it difficult to see the familiar skyline. Amidst the murk, a group of people gathered around, laughing and enjoying an xkcd comic about politics, suspended on a makeshift board.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyber folk ] and depicting this scene: In Wichita, a haze hangs low in the sky, making it difficult to see the familiar skyline. Amidst the murk, a group of people gathered around, laughing and enjoying an xkcd comic about politics, suspended on a makeshift board. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a cyber folk gathering in Wichita, with a low-hanging haze creating an ethereal atmosphere. In the center, a group of people are gathered around a glowing holographic display showing an xkcd comic about politics. The scene is lit by neon lights, with digital artwork and futuristic elements blending seamlessly with the urban landscape. The people are depicted in a mix of retro and futuristic fashion, adding to the cyber folk aesthetic.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air pollution in Wichita caused xkcd comics published about politics to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Wichita Winds: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution and Political xkcd Comics

Journal of Environmental Satire and Statistical Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wichita and xkcd comics published about politics. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and AI analysis of xkcd comics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7762892 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2016.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Wichita Winds: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution and Political xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of a quirky investigation into the correlation between air pollution in Wichita and the publication of xkcd comics about politics. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and employing advanced artificial intelligence techniques to analyze a decade's worth of xkcd comics, we aimed to shed light on this unlikely but riveting association. Our results reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7762892 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2007 to 2016, uncovering a whimsical yet intriguing relationship. Our study not only bridges disciplines but also brings an element of lightheartedness to the realm of statistical analysis, leaving readers with a breath of fresh air as they contemplate this unexpected connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wichita and xkcd comics published about politics. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wichita Winds: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution and Political xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of a quirky investigation into the correlation between air pollution in Wichita and the publication of xkcd comics about politics. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and employing advanced artificial intelligence techniques to analyze a decade's worth of xkcd comics, we aimed to shed light on this unlikely but riveting association. Our results reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7762892 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2007 to 2016, uncovering a whimsical yet intriguing relationship. Our study not only bridges disciplines but also brings an element of lightheartedness to the realm of statistical analysis, leaving readers with a breath of fresh air as they contemplate this unexpected connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
I. INTRODUCTION

Dust off those computer screens, dear readers, because we are about to embark on a journey through the whimsical world of statistical analysis and comic hilarity. In this paper, we delve into the enigmatic nexus of air pollution in Wichita and the publication of xkcd comics about politics. Yes, you read that right – we're going to connect smog and satire to uncover an improbable association that is sure to leave you chuckling and scratching your heads in equal measure.

The backdrop of our study is none other than Wichita, Kansas, known for its winds that can carry across the plains the aroma of toasted bread from the local bakeries, the unmistakable scent of freshly mowed lawns, and alas, the subtle hint of air pollution. Against this atmospheric canvas, we cast our net wide, harnessing data from the Environmental Protection Agency to capture the ebbs and flows of air pollutants over a decade-long period.

But wait, what's the twist, you ask? Enter xkcd, the webcomic beloved by nerds and geeks alike. With its trademark stick figures and thought-provoking humor, xkcd has ventured into the realm of politics, sparking giggles and groans in equal measure. Armed with cutting-edge artificial intelligence techniques, we analyze over a decade's worth of xkcd comics to pinpoint the exact moments when political satire hits the digital pages.

As we gaze upon this peculiar pairing of air pollution and political xkcd comics, we can't help but marvel at the serendipity of this investigation. While our findings may initially seem as improbable as an economist moonlighting as a stand-up comedian, we assure you that our statistical analysis holds firm, uncovering a correlation coefficient that sparkles like a freshly polished data set.

So fasten your seatbelts and prepare for an exhilarating romp through the world of air pollution, xkcd comics, and statistical jocularity. Our analysis promises to reveal a connection that is as surprising as a solemn economist cracking a joke at an academic conference. So, brace yourselves for an adventure that will leave you gasping for air – literally and figuratively!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wichita and xkcd comics published about politics. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wichita Winds: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution and Political xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of a quirky investigation into the correlation between air pollution in Wichita and the publication of xkcd comics about politics. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and employing advanced artificial intelligence techniques to analyze a decade's worth of xkcd comics, we aimed to shed light on this unlikely but riveting association. Our results reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7762892 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2007 to 2016, uncovering a whimsical yet intriguing relationship. Our study not only bridges disciplines but also brings an element of lightheartedness to the realm of statistical analysis, leaving readers with a breath of fresh air as they contemplate this unexpected connection.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
I. INTRODUCTION
Dust off those computer screens, dear readers, because we are about to embark on a journey through the whimsical world of statistical analysis and comic hilarity. In this paper, we delve into the enigmatic nexus of air pollution in Wichita and the publication of xkcd comics about politics. Yes, you read that right – we're going to connect smog and satire to uncover an improbable association that is sure to leave you chuckling and scratching your heads in equal measure.
The backdrop of our study is none other than Wichita, Kansas, known for its winds that can carry across the plains the aroma of toasted bread from the local bakeries, the unmistakable scent of freshly mowed lawns, and alas, the subtle hint of air pollution. Against this atmospheric canvas, we cast our net wide, harnessing data from the Environmental Protection Agency to capture the ebbs and flows of air pollutants over a decade-long period.
But wait, what's the twist, you ask? Enter xkcd, the webcomic beloved by nerds and geeks alike. With its trademark stick figures and thought-provoking humor, xkcd has ventured into the realm of politics, sparking giggles and groans in equal measure. Armed with cutting-edge artificial intelligence techniques, we analyze over a decade's worth of xkcd comics to pinpoint the exact moments when political satire hits the digital pages.
As we gaze upon this peculiar pairing of air pollution and political xkcd comics, we can't help but marvel at the serendipity of this investigation. While our findings may initially seem as improbable as an economist moonlighting as a stand-up comedian, we assure you that our statistical analysis holds firm, uncovering a correlation coefficient that sparkles like a freshly polished data set.
So fasten your seatbelts and prepare for an exhilarating romp through the world of air pollution, xkcd comics, and statistical jocularity. Our analysis promises to reveal a connection that is as surprising as a solemn economist cracking a joke at an academic conference. So, brace yourselves for an adventure that will leave you gasping for air – literally and figuratively!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Air Pollution in Urban Environments: Issues and Solutions," Smith et al. (2015) examine the far-reaching implications of air pollution in urban landscapes, offering a comprehensive overview of the sources and effects of airborne contaminants. Their meticulous analysis shines a spotlight on the pressing need for rigorous interventions to combat the adverse effects of air pollution, a topic that wafts through the corridors of scientific discourse with as much urgency as a sudden gust of wind through an open window.

Furthermore, Doe's "The Politics of Satire: xkcd Edition" (2014) explores the intersection of political discourse and humor, delving into the intricate layers of political satire within the context of popular culture. Through an exploration of the xkcd webcomic, Doe highlights the role of satire in shaping public perceptions and engaging audiences in matters of governance, illuminating the power of humor to puncture the somber veil of politics.

Jones' seminal work, "Data Mining Techniques in Comics Analysis" (2012), lays the foundation for our unconventional approach, providing a roadmap for the exploitation of computational methods to dissect the subtle nuances of sequential art. This pioneering work serves as a guiding beacon as we navigate the uncharted waters of xkcd's politically tinged humor, infusing our research with an element of whimsy that is as invigorating as a breath of fresh air.

In addition to these scholarly inquiries, the present investigation draws inspiration from real-world accounts and fictional narratives that orbit the themes of pollution and political satire. From Rachel Carson's "Silent Spring" (1962) to Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" (2006), the literature on environmental degradation infuses our analysis with a gravitas that is as weighty as the volume of pollutants hanging in the air of a busy metropolis.

Turning our attention to the realm of satire, novels such as George Orwell's "Animal Farm" (1945) and Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World" (1932) serve as cautionary tales that mirror the absurdities and ironies of political machinations, offering a salient reminder of the power of humor and allegory in dissecting the human condition. Indeed, the pages of these literary masterpieces overflow with insights as rich and layered as a finely aged cheese, enlivening our pursuit with a flair for the dramatic that is as captivating as a well-crafted punchline.

In a whimsical departure from convention, this study also taps into unconventional sources, drawing inspiration from the most unexpected corners of human creativity. From perusing the backs of shampoo bottles, with their tantalizing promises of luscious locks and unparalleled shine, to eavesdropping on the whispers of passing clouds as they swap tales of meteorological mischief, our foray into offbeat sources adds a dash of mirth to our academic endeavor, infusing our exploration with an air of delightful absurdity that is as refreshing as a whoosh of wind on a scorching summer day.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wichita and xkcd comics published about politics. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and AI analysis of xkcd comics . You used data from 2007 to 2016

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wichita Winds: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution and Political xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of a quirky investigation into the correlation between air pollution in Wichita and the publication of xkcd comics about politics. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and employing advanced artificial intelligence techniques to analyze a decade's worth of xkcd comics, we aimed to shed light on this unlikely but riveting association. Our results reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7762892 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2007 to 2016, uncovering a whimsical yet intriguing relationship. Our study not only bridges disciplines but also brings an element of lightheartedness to the realm of statistical analysis, leaving readers with a breath of fresh air as they contemplate this unexpected connection.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
I. INTRODUCTION
Dust off those computer screens, dear readers, because we are about to embark on a journey through the whimsical world of statistical analysis and comic hilarity. In this paper, we delve into the enigmatic nexus of air pollution in Wichita and the publication of xkcd comics about politics. Yes, you read that right – we're going to connect smog and satire to uncover an improbable association that is sure to leave you chuckling and scratching your heads in equal measure.
The backdrop of our study is none other than Wichita, Kansas, known for its winds that can carry across the plains the aroma of toasted bread from the local bakeries, the unmistakable scent of freshly mowed lawns, and alas, the subtle hint of air pollution. Against this atmospheric canvas, we cast our net wide, harnessing data from the Environmental Protection Agency to capture the ebbs and flows of air pollutants over a decade-long period.
But wait, what's the twist, you ask? Enter xkcd, the webcomic beloved by nerds and geeks alike. With its trademark stick figures and thought-provoking humor, xkcd has ventured into the realm of politics, sparking giggles and groans in equal measure. Armed with cutting-edge artificial intelligence techniques, we analyze over a decade's worth of xkcd comics to pinpoint the exact moments when political satire hits the digital pages.
As we gaze upon this peculiar pairing of air pollution and political xkcd comics, we can't help but marvel at the serendipity of this investigation. While our findings may initially seem as improbable as an economist moonlighting as a stand-up comedian, we assure you that our statistical analysis holds firm, uncovering a correlation coefficient that sparkles like a freshly polished data set.
So fasten your seatbelts and prepare for an exhilarating romp through the world of air pollution, xkcd comics, and statistical jocularity. Our analysis promises to reveal a connection that is as surprising as a solemn economist cracking a joke at an academic conference. So, brace yourselves for an adventure that will leave you gasping for air – literally and figuratively!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

A. Data Collection
1. Air Pollution Data:
To capture the essence of Wichita's atmospheric makeup, we turned to the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) treasure trove of air quality data. Our team scoured through an assortment of pollutant measurements, from the notorious nitrogen dioxide to the mischievous particulate matter, collecting a comprehensive record of Wichita's air quality over the span of 2007 to 2016. With these data in hand, we were ready to embark on our odyssey through the windswept plains of statistical analysis.

2. xkcd Comics on Politics:
For the delightful domain of webcomics, we harnessed the power of artificial intelligence to sift through the digital landscape of xkcd comics. Employing a sophisticated algorithm that could discern political nuances and satirical ripples, we meticulously combed through over a decade's worth of xkcd material. Much like intrepid explorers mapping uncharted territories, we charted the ebbs and flows of political content in the quirky world of stick figures and geeky humor.

B. Data Analysis
1. Air Pollution Metrics:
Armed with an arsenal of statistical tools and a touch of whimsy, we delved into the EPA's air pollution data. Our analysis encompassed a smorgasbord of metrics, from the average concentrations of pollutants to the oscillations of air quality index readings. Through the magic of computation and a dash of statistical wizardry, we sought to distill the essence of Wichita's atmospheric mélange.

2. xkcd Comics and Political Content:
With an ensemble of advanced AI techniques at our disposal, we navigated the vast expanse of xkcd's political oeuvre. Our algorithms were finely tuned to detect the nuances of political humor and the timely release of political comics, creating a tapestry of satirical cadence and satirical crescendos. Just as a knowledgeable sommelier discerns the subtle notes of a fine wine, our AI analysis teased out the flavorful essence of political banter within the digital pages of xkcd.

C. Correlation Analysis
To unravel the whimsical yet profound connection between air pollution and political xkcd comics, we applied a robust correlation analysis. With a twinkle in our eyes and a bevy of statistical tests at our disposal, we probed the interplay between air quality metrics and the publication of political xkcd comics. The resulting correlation coefficient served as our compass, guiding us through the tempestuous winds of statistical inference and improbable correlation.

D. Statistical Assurance
1. Robustness Checks:
To fortify the veracity of our findings, we subjected our data and analyses to a rigorous battery of robustness checks. These checks encompassed various sensitivity analyses and diagnostic examinations, ensuring that our results stood firm against the tumultuous tides of statistical scrutiny.

2. Significance Assessment:
Armed with a keen eye for statistical significance, we scrutinized the p-values and confidence intervals of our correlation coefficient. The significance of our findings was akin to stumbling upon a rare gem in a statistical mine – a fortuitous discovery encapsulated in the confines of p < 0.01.

In presenting our methodology, we extend to our esteemed readers an invitation to partake in our whimsical voyage through air pollution, xkcd comics, and the hallowed halls of statistical exploration. With our data collection, analysis, and statistical assurance firmly in place, we shall unravel the serendipitous connection between smog and satire, leaving readers with a dataset as refreshing as a breeze on a sweltering summer day.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wichita and xkcd comics published about politics. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and AI analysis of xkcd comics .

For the time period 2007 to 2016, you found a correlation 0.7762892, r-squared of 0.6026249, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wichita Winds: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution and Political xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of a quirky investigation into the correlation between air pollution in Wichita and the publication of xkcd comics about politics. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and employing advanced artificial intelligence techniques to analyze a decade's worth of xkcd comics, we aimed to shed light on this unlikely but riveting association. Our results reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7762892 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2007 to 2016, uncovering a whimsical yet intriguing relationship. Our study not only bridges disciplines but also brings an element of lightheartedness to the realm of statistical analysis, leaving readers with a breath of fresh air as they contemplate this unexpected connection.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
I. INTRODUCTION
Dust off those computer screens, dear readers, because we are about to embark on a journey through the whimsical world of statistical analysis and comic hilarity. In this paper, we delve into the enigmatic nexus of air pollution in Wichita and the publication of xkcd comics about politics. Yes, you read that right – we're going to connect smog and satire to uncover an improbable association that is sure to leave you chuckling and scratching your heads in equal measure.
The backdrop of our study is none other than Wichita, Kansas, known for its winds that can carry across the plains the aroma of toasted bread from the local bakeries, the unmistakable scent of freshly mowed lawns, and alas, the subtle hint of air pollution. Against this atmospheric canvas, we cast our net wide, harnessing data from the Environmental Protection Agency to capture the ebbs and flows of air pollutants over a decade-long period.
But wait, what's the twist, you ask? Enter xkcd, the webcomic beloved by nerds and geeks alike. With its trademark stick figures and thought-provoking humor, xkcd has ventured into the realm of politics, sparking giggles and groans in equal measure. Armed with cutting-edge artificial intelligence techniques, we analyze over a decade's worth of xkcd comics to pinpoint the exact moments when political satire hits the digital pages.
As we gaze upon this peculiar pairing of air pollution and political xkcd comics, we can't help but marvel at the serendipity of this investigation. While our findings may initially seem as improbable as an economist moonlighting as a stand-up comedian, we assure you that our statistical analysis holds firm, uncovering a correlation coefficient that sparkles like a freshly polished data set.
So fasten your seatbelts and prepare for an exhilarating romp through the world of air pollution, xkcd comics, and statistical jocularity. Our analysis promises to reveal a connection that is as surprising as a solemn economist cracking a joke at an academic conference. So, brace yourselves for an adventure that will leave you gasping for air – literally and figuratively!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the connection between air pollution in Wichita and the publication of xkcd comics about politics yielded some delightfully surprising findings. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.7762892, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. To put it in layman's terms, it's as if the winds of Wichita were whispering jokes to the xkcd creator, prompting a series of political satire to bloom.

Our analysis also revealed an r-squared value of 0.6026249, suggesting that a substantial 60.26% of the variability in the frequency of political xkcd comics can be explained by fluctuations in air pollution. It's as if the air pollution was playing a cameo role in the creation of these comics, adding an unexpected twist to their publication timeline.

Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 further emphasizes the statistical significance of the relationship. In other words, this correlation is as clear as a well-drawn xkcd comic – unmistakable and thought-provoking.

The correlation is visually depicted in Fig. 1, a scatterplot that illustrates the strong connection between air pollution levels and the appearance of political xkcd comics. The points on the graph are as closely packed as a group of statisticians at a comic book convention, leaving no doubt about the intriguing relationship uncovered by our analysis.

Overall, our results highlight a truly remarkable association between air pollution in Wichita and the publication of political xkcd comics, demonstrating that even the most unexpected pairings can have a surprising statistical link. This finding is as remarkable as finding a punchline in a data set, and it adds a unique and humorous dimension to the world of statistical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wichita and xkcd comics published about politics. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Wichita Winds: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution and Political xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of a quirky investigation into the correlation between air pollution in Wichita and the publication of xkcd comics about politics. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and employing advanced artificial intelligence techniques to analyze a decade's worth of xkcd comics, we aimed to shed light on this unlikely but riveting association. Our results reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7762892 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2007 to 2016, uncovering a whimsical yet intriguing relationship. Our study not only bridges disciplines but also brings an element of lightheartedness to the realm of statistical analysis, leaving readers with a breath of fresh air as they contemplate this unexpected connection.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Air Pollution in Urban Environments: Issues and Solutions," Smith et al. (2015) examine the far-reaching implications of air pollution in urban landscapes, offering a comprehensive overview of the sources and effects of airborne contaminants. Their meticulous analysis shines a spotlight on the pressing need for rigorous interventions to combat the adverse effects of air pollution, a topic that wafts through the corridors of scientific discourse with as much urgency as a sudden gust of wind through an open window.
Furthermore, Doe's "The Politics of Satire: xkcd Edition" (2014) explores the intersection of political discourse and humor, delving into the intricate layers of political satire within the context of popular culture. Through an exploration of the xkcd webcomic, Doe highlights the role of satire in shaping public perceptions and engaging audiences in matters of governance, illuminating the power of humor to puncture the somber veil of politics.
Jones' seminal work, "Data Mining Techniques in Comics Analysis" (2012), lays the foundation for our unconventional approach, providing a roadmap for the exploitation of computational methods to dissect the subtle nuances of sequential art. This pioneering work serves as a guiding beacon as we navigate the uncharted waters of xkcd's politically tinged humor, infusing our research with an element of whimsy that is as invigorating as a breath of fresh air.
In addition to these scholarly inquiries, the present investigation draws inspiration from real-world accounts and fictional narratives that orbit the themes of pollution and political satire. From Rachel Carson's "Silent Spring" (1962) to Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" (2006), the literature on environmental degradation infuses our analysis with a gravitas that is as weighty as the volume of pollutants hanging in the air of a busy metropolis.
Turning our attention to the realm of satire, novels such as George Orwell's "Animal Farm" (1945) and Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World" (1932) serve as cautionary tales that mirror the absurdities and ironies of political machinations, offering a salient reminder of the power of humor and allegory in dissecting the human condition. Indeed, the pages of these literary masterpieces overflow with insights as rich and layered as a finely aged cheese, enlivening our pursuit with a flair for the dramatic that is as captivating as a well-crafted punchline.
In a whimsical departure from convention, this study also taps into unconventional sources, drawing inspiration from the most unexpected corners of human creativity. From perusing the backs of shampoo bottles, with their tantalizing promises of luscious locks and unparalleled shine, to eavesdropping on the whispers of passing clouds as they swap tales of meteorological mischief, our foray into offbeat sources adds a dash of mirth to our academic endeavor, infusing our exploration with an air of delightful absurdity that is as refreshing as a whoosh of wind on a scorching summer day.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the connection between air pollution in Wichita and the publication of xkcd comics about politics yielded some delightfully surprising findings. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.7762892, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. To put it in layman's terms, it's as if the winds of Wichita were whispering jokes to the xkcd creator, prompting a series of political satire to bloom.
Our analysis also revealed an r-squared value of 0.6026249, suggesting that a substantial 60.26% of the variability in the frequency of political xkcd comics can be explained by fluctuations in air pollution. It's as if the air pollution was playing a cameo role in the creation of these comics, adding an unexpected twist to their publication timeline.
Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 further emphasizes the statistical significance of the relationship. In other words, this correlation is as clear as a well-drawn xkcd comic – unmistakable and thought-provoking.
The correlation is visually depicted in Fig. 1, a scatterplot that illustrates the strong connection between air pollution levels and the appearance of political xkcd comics. The points on the graph are as closely packed as a group of statisticians at a comic book convention, leaving no doubt about the intriguing relationship uncovered by our analysis.
Overall, our results highlight a truly remarkable association between air pollution in Wichita and the publication of political xkcd comics, demonstrating that even the most unexpected pairings can have a surprising statistical link. This finding is as remarkable as finding a punchline in a data set, and it adds a unique and humorous dimension to the world of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

As we reflect on the whimsical and unexpected relationship unveiled by our study, we find ourselves in a whirlwind of statistical marvel and comic intrigue. Our results not only support but also weave a comical thread into the fabric of prior research, akin to incorporating a playful pun into the seriousness of academic discourse.

The correlation coefficient of 0.7762892 discovered between air pollution in Wichita and the publication of political xkcd comics mirrors the connections found in prior literature. It's as if the winds of statistical fate had blown our findings into alignment with the serious contemplations of pollution's impact on society. Indeed, much like a sudden gust of wind through an open window, this correlation has brought together the seemingly disparate worlds of environmental concerns and comic satire, forming a bond as strong as the covalent sharing of electrons.

Our results echo the sentiments expressed in Smith et al.'s (2015) investigation of air pollution, which emphasized the urgent need for interventions to combat airborne contaminants. The robust relationship we uncovered beckons for attention to the whimsical dance between air quality and the comic musings on political affairs. It's as if the air pollution levels were secretly orchestrating a comedic play, with each inhalation of pollutants breathing life into a fresh political xkcd comic.

Similarly, our findings resonate with Doe's (2014) exploration of the role of satire in political discourse, illuminating the ability of humor to puncture the somber veil of politics. The statistical link we unveiled suggests that air pollution may be the unseen jester, whispering punchlines to the xkcd creator and prompting a flurry of political satire to blossom. This unexpected camaraderie between pollution levels and comic artistry adds a dash of whimsy to the otherwise weighty discourse on political satire, tying together the serious implications of environmental degradation with the levity of satire in a manner as perfectly balanced as a well-crafted joke.

Furthermore, our results align with Jones' (2012) pioneering work on data mining techniques in comics analysis, infusing our research with a lighthearted flair as invigorating as a breath of fresh air. This uncharted territory of using computational methods to dissect the subtleties of sequential art has led us to the unexpected discovery of a statistical connection that is as surprising as finding a comedic twist in the midst of a serious discussion.

In conclusion, our investigation has not only uncovered a statistically significant correlation that is as clear as a well-drawn xkcd comic but has also underscored the whimsical intertwining of air pollution and political xkcd comics. This intertwining, although unexpected, adds a delightful dimension to the landscape of statistical analysis and underscores the potential for lighthearted discovery in the most unusual of places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wichita and xkcd comics published about politics. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Wichita Winds: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution and Political xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of a quirky investigation into the correlation between air pollution in Wichita and the publication of xkcd comics about politics. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and employing advanced artificial intelligence techniques to analyze a decade's worth of xkcd comics, we aimed to shed light on this unlikely but riveting association. Our results reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7762892 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2007 to 2016, uncovering a whimsical yet intriguing relationship. Our study not only bridges disciplines but also brings an element of lightheartedness to the realm of statistical analysis, leaving readers with a breath of fresh air as they contemplate this unexpected connection.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
I. INTRODUCTION
Dust off those computer screens, dear readers, because we are about to embark on a journey through the whimsical world of statistical analysis and comic hilarity. In this paper, we delve into the enigmatic nexus of air pollution in Wichita and the publication of xkcd comics about politics. Yes, you read that right – we're going to connect smog and satire to uncover an improbable association that is sure to leave you chuckling and scratching your heads in equal measure.
The backdrop of our study is none other than Wichita, Kansas, known for its winds that can carry across the plains the aroma of toasted bread from the local bakeries, the unmistakable scent of freshly mowed lawns, and alas, the subtle hint of air pollution. Against this atmospheric canvas, we cast our net wide, harnessing data from the Environmental Protection Agency to capture the ebbs and flows of air pollutants over a decade-long period.
But wait, what's the twist, you ask? Enter xkcd, the webcomic beloved by nerds and geeks alike. With its trademark stick figures and thought-provoking humor, xkcd has ventured into the realm of politics, sparking giggles and groans in equal measure. Armed with cutting-edge artificial intelligence techniques, we analyze over a decade's worth of xkcd comics to pinpoint the exact moments when political satire hits the digital pages.
As we gaze upon this peculiar pairing of air pollution and political xkcd comics, we can't help but marvel at the serendipity of this investigation. While our findings may initially seem as improbable as an economist moonlighting as a stand-up comedian, we assure you that our statistical analysis holds firm, uncovering a correlation coefficient that sparkles like a freshly polished data set.
So fasten your seatbelts and prepare for an exhilarating romp through the world of air pollution, xkcd comics, and statistical jocularity. Our analysis promises to reveal a connection that is as surprising as a solemn economist cracking a joke at an academic conference. So, brace yourselves for an adventure that will leave you gasping for air – literally and figuratively!

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the connection between air pollution in Wichita and the publication of xkcd comics about politics yielded some delightfully surprising findings. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.7762892, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. To put it in layman's terms, it's as if the winds of Wichita were whispering jokes to the xkcd creator, prompting a series of political satire to bloom.
Our analysis also revealed an r-squared value of 0.6026249, suggesting that a substantial 60.26% of the variability in the frequency of political xkcd comics can be explained by fluctuations in air pollution. It's as if the air pollution was playing a cameo role in the creation of these comics, adding an unexpected twist to their publication timeline.
Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 further emphasizes the statistical significance of the relationship. In other words, this correlation is as clear as a well-drawn xkcd comic – unmistakable and thought-provoking.
The correlation is visually depicted in Fig. 1, a scatterplot that illustrates the strong connection between air pollution levels and the appearance of political xkcd comics. The points on the graph are as closely packed as a group of statisticians at a comic book convention, leaving no doubt about the intriguing relationship uncovered by our analysis.
Overall, our results highlight a truly remarkable association between air pollution in Wichita and the publication of political xkcd comics, demonstrating that even the most unexpected pairings can have a surprising statistical link. This finding is as remarkable as finding a punchline in a data set, and it adds a unique and humorous dimension to the world of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our whimsical investigation tethers together two seemingly disparate entities – the winds of Wichita and the political musings of xkcd comics – in a statistical waltz that leaves us breathless, in more ways than one. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient as strong as the aroma of freshly baked bread wafting through the Kansas air, with an r-squared value that tickles our funny bone, attributing over 60% of the variability in political xkcd comics to air pollution whims.

However, it's not just the statistical significance that leaves us grinning like the Cheshire cat; it's the sheer unexpectedness of this connection. It's as if the winds of Wichita were whispering jokes to the xkcd creator, prompting a series of political satire to bloom. We can almost imagine the smog morphing into speech bubbles, carrying poignant political commentary across the digital pages.

Our scatterplot is as tightly knitted as the plots in a Christopher Nolan film, leaving no room for doubt – air pollution in Wichita and the publication of political xkcd comics are as intertwined as a pair of earbuds in the depths of a pocket. This revelation adds a playful, charming layer to the world of statistical analysis, akin to finding a hidden Easter egg in a data set.

So, with a twinkle in our eye and a chuckle in our hearts, we assert that no further research is needed in this peculiar but delightful realm. For now, let's bask in the whimsy of the wind's whispers and the wit of political xkcd comics. As the old adage goes, "Let's not stir the statistical pot when the comic brew tastes just right!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Wichita Winds: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution and Political xkcd Comics. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Environmental Satire and Statistical Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Wichita Winds: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution and Political xkcd Comics. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Comedic Climate Analysis and Political Cartoon Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Wichita Winds: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution and Political xkcd Comics with an abstract of This paper presents the findings of a quirky investigation into the correlation between air pollution in Wichita and the publication of xkcd comics about politics. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and employing advanced artificial intelligence techniques to analyze a decade's worth of xkcd comics, we aimed to shed light on this unlikely but riveting association. Our results reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7762892 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2007 to 2016, uncovering a whimsical yet intriguing relationship. Our study not only bridges disciplines but also brings an element of lightheartedness to the realm of statistical analysis, leaving readers with a breath of fresh air as they contemplate this unexpected connection.

ChatGPT:

"Wichita air pollution, xkcd comics, political xkcd comics, statistical analysis, air pollution correlation, xkcd comics correlation, Environmental Protection Agency data, artificial intelligence analysis, quirky study, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, Wichita air quality, political satire xkcd"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Wichita
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Wichita, KS
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Wichita

xkcd comics published about politics
Detailed data title: The number of xkcd comics published each year about politics
Source: AI analysis of xkcd comics
Additional Info: I designed a Python workflow to perform OCR on every xkcd comic, feed that text into a large language model, and ask the model whether this comic was about the category named in the title.

See what else correlates with xkcd comics published about politics

Correlation r = 0.7762892 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6026249 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 60.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., xkcd comics published about politics) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Wichita) over the 10 years from 2007 through 2016.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0083. 0.0082816343628055560000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.78 in 0.83% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 121 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.29, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016
Air pollution in Wichita (Bad air quality days)000.273973001.09290000.273224
xkcd comics published about politics (xkcd comics)5101086153988




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0,0,0.273973,0,0,1.0929,0,0,0,0.273224,])
array_2 = np.array([5,10,10,8,6,15,3,9,8,8,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Wichita"
array_2_name = "xkcd comics published about politics"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 2057 · Black Variable ID: 21444 · Red Variable ID: 20019
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0