about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,031 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Killian and the second variable is Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM).  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

More babies named Killian means more toddlers demanding family vacations, leading to higher usage of Trip.com for booking, and ultimately boosting the stock price.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling city street scene, where a group of friends are gathered together, all depicted in a photo-realistic style. The friends should be portrayed as eagerly checking their phones and engaging in excited conversation, with subtle indications of their upcoming trip booked through Trip.com Group. One of the friends, named Killian, should be shown receiving numerous notifications on his phone, with a visible sense of his growing popularity on social media platforms. In the background, subtly incorporate a representation of the Trip.com Group stock price steadily climbing, reflecting its popularity among investors. Capture the vibrant energy of the urban setting and the enthusiasm of the friends as they interact with their devices and discuss their upcoming adventure. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Killian and Trip.com Group's stock price. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic Steampunk Charcoal Photorealism A photo-realistic image
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Killian and Trip.com Group's stock price together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the bustling city, a group of friends eagerly checks their phones, excitedly discussing their upcoming trip booked through Trip.com Group. One friend, named Killian, receives a flurry of notifications as his popularity peaks on social media, with his name trending across various platforms. Meanwhile, the stock price of Trip.com Group steadily climbs in the background, reflecting its popularity among investors.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In the bustling city, a group of friends eagerly checks their phones, excitedly discussing their upcoming trip booked through Trip.com Group. One friend, named Killian, receives a flurry of notifications as his popularity peaks on social media, with his name trending across various platforms. Meanwhile, the stock price of Trip.com Group steadily climbs in the background, reflecting its popularity among investors. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a bustling city street scene, where a group of friends are gathered together, all depicted in a photo-realistic style. The friends should be portrayed as eagerly checking their phones and engaging in excited conversation, with subtle indications of their upcoming trip booked through Trip.com Group. One of the friends, named Killian, should be shown receiving numerous notifications on his phone, with a visible sense of his growing popularity on social media platforms. In the background, subtly incorporate a representation of the Trip.com Group stock price steadily climbing, reflecting its popularity among investors. Capture the vibrant energy of the urban setting and the enthusiasm of the friends as they interact with their devices and discuss their upcoming adventure.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Killian caused Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM) to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Killing It: The Killian Name Popularity and TCOM Stock Price Connection

The Journal of Quirky Data Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Killian and Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9177683 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Killing It: The Killian Name Popularity and TCOM Stock Price Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study dives into the correlation between the rising popularity of the first name Killian and the stock price of Trip.com Group (TCOM) from 2004 to 2022. Our team combined data from the US Social Security Administration with LSEG Analytics to analyze this seemingly quirky relationship. The results revealed an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9177683 with statistical significance (p < 0.01), suggesting a significant association between the two variables. Our findings not only shed light on the unexpected influence of nomenclature on stock performance but also highlight the potential for unconventional indicators in financial analysis. Join us in unraveling the mysteries of "Killing It" in both the name game and stock market trends!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Killian and Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Killing It: The Killian Name Popularity and TCOM Stock Price Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study dives into the correlation between the rising popularity of the first name Killian and the stock price of Trip.com Group (TCOM) from 2004 to 2022. Our team combined data from the US Social Security Administration with LSEG Analytics to analyze this seemingly quirky relationship. The results revealed an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9177683 with statistical significance (p < 0.01), suggesting a significant association between the two variables. Our findings not only shed light on the unexpected influence of nomenclature on stock performance but also highlight the potential for unconventional indicators in financial analysis. Join us in unraveling the mysteries of "Killing It" in both the name game and stock market trends!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of finance is often characterized by complex models, intricate theories, and mountains of data - not exactly a place where one would expect to find a connection to the world of baby names. However, as in any good mystery novel, sometimes the most unlikely clues lead to the most intriguing revelations. Enter the enigmatic case of "Killing It": the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name Killian and the stock price of Trip.com Group (TCOM).

As researchers, we are accustomed to diving deep into data and scrutinizing numbers with keen precision. But who could have guessed that the rise and fall of a particular name would be so intricately linked with the ebbs and flows of an international company's stock price? Is it purely a coincidence, a cosmic joke from the financial fates, or perhaps a serendipitous insight into the hidden forces shaping the market?

In this study, we embark on a quest to unravel this unexpected connection and explore the implications it holds for the world of finance. From nosediving stock prices to skyrocketing name popularities, we navigate through the tumultuous seas of data, seeking to make sense of this peculiar intersection between social trends and market dynamics. So, buckle up and prepare for a rollercoaster ride of statistical analysis, name puns, and potentially surprising insights. The adventure awaits as we seek to decipher the intriguing correlation between "Killing It" and TCOM stock prices.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Killian and Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Killing It: The Killian Name Popularity and TCOM Stock Price Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study dives into the correlation between the rising popularity of the first name Killian and the stock price of Trip.com Group (TCOM) from 2004 to 2022. Our team combined data from the US Social Security Administration with LSEG Analytics to analyze this seemingly quirky relationship. The results revealed an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9177683 with statistical significance (p < 0.01), suggesting a significant association between the two variables. Our findings not only shed light on the unexpected influence of nomenclature on stock performance but also highlight the potential for unconventional indicators in financial analysis. Join us in unraveling the mysteries of "Killing It" in both the name game and stock market trends!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of finance is often characterized by complex models, intricate theories, and mountains of data - not exactly a place where one would expect to find a connection to the world of baby names. However, as in any good mystery novel, sometimes the most unlikely clues lead to the most intriguing revelations. Enter the enigmatic case of "Killing It": the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name Killian and the stock price of Trip.com Group (TCOM).
As researchers, we are accustomed to diving deep into data and scrutinizing numbers with keen precision. But who could have guessed that the rise and fall of a particular name would be so intricately linked with the ebbs and flows of an international company's stock price? Is it purely a coincidence, a cosmic joke from the financial fates, or perhaps a serendipitous insight into the hidden forces shaping the market?
In this study, we embark on a quest to unravel this unexpected connection and explore the implications it holds for the world of finance. From nosediving stock prices to skyrocketing name popularities, we navigate through the tumultuous seas of data, seeking to make sense of this peculiar intersection between social trends and market dynamics. So, buckle up and prepare for a rollercoaster ride of statistical analysis, name puns, and potentially surprising insights. The adventure awaits as we seek to decipher the intriguing correlation between "Killing It" and TCOM stock prices.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The impact of naming trends on seemingly unrelated economic variables has been a subject of great fascination among researchers in various fields. Smith et al. (2010) conducted a study examining the influence of popular baby names on consumer spending habits, while Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the potential impact of unique names on corporate branding strategies. These works laid the groundwork for uncovering a potential link between the popularity of the first name Killian and the stock performance of Trip.com Group (TCOM).

In "Naming and Nomics: Exploring the Economics of Baby Names," the authors unearthed surprising correlations between the rise of unconventional names and patterns in consumer behavior. Meanwhile, "Branding Bonanza: The Power of Unique Names in Corporate Identity" shed light on the influence of distinctive names in shaping public perceptions of companies. However, little did these researchers know that their explorations into the world of nomenclature would eventually intersect with the realm of stock market dynamics in the context of "Killing It" and TCOM.

As we delve further into the literature, it is essential to consider not only the factual accounts but also fictional works that may inadvertently offer insights into the obscure connections we are exploring. Could "Name Quest: The Legend of Market Influencers" or "Stockholm Syndrome: When Stocks and Names Collide" hold hidden clues within their fictional narratives? The enigmatic allure of the unknown beckons us to contemplate unconventional sources that might illuminate the unexpected relationship we are investigating.

In addition to books, let us not discount the potential influence of popular culture on our perceptions and understanding of these phenomena. Could the board game "Stock Name Shuffle" offer a playful analogy to the intricate dynamics at play, or does "Nameopoly: Navigating the Market of Monikers" hold secret strategies for identifying trends in nomenclature and their impact on financial realms? These whimsical considerations prompt us to approach our investigation with a sense of open-minded curiosity, recognizing the potential for unconventional inspiration in our pursuit of knowledge.

Now, as we embark on this intellectual journey, let us brace ourselves for the unexpected twists and turns that lie ahead. Prepare for a voyage into the realm of statistical absurdity, where the mysterious connection between "Killing It" and TCOM stock prices may just unfold before our very eyes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Killian and Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Killing It: The Killian Name Popularity and TCOM Stock Price Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study dives into the correlation between the rising popularity of the first name Killian and the stock price of Trip.com Group (TCOM) from 2004 to 2022. Our team combined data from the US Social Security Administration with LSEG Analytics to analyze this seemingly quirky relationship. The results revealed an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9177683 with statistical significance (p < 0.01), suggesting a significant association between the two variables. Our findings not only shed light on the unexpected influence of nomenclature on stock performance but also highlight the potential for unconventional indicators in financial analysis. Join us in unraveling the mysteries of "Killing It" in both the name game and stock market trends!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of finance is often characterized by complex models, intricate theories, and mountains of data - not exactly a place where one would expect to find a connection to the world of baby names. However, as in any good mystery novel, sometimes the most unlikely clues lead to the most intriguing revelations. Enter the enigmatic case of "Killing It": the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name Killian and the stock price of Trip.com Group (TCOM).
As researchers, we are accustomed to diving deep into data and scrutinizing numbers with keen precision. But who could have guessed that the rise and fall of a particular name would be so intricately linked with the ebbs and flows of an international company's stock price? Is it purely a coincidence, a cosmic joke from the financial fates, or perhaps a serendipitous insight into the hidden forces shaping the market?
In this study, we embark on a quest to unravel this unexpected connection and explore the implications it holds for the world of finance. From nosediving stock prices to skyrocketing name popularities, we navigate through the tumultuous seas of data, seeking to make sense of this peculiar intersection between social trends and market dynamics. So, buckle up and prepare for a rollercoaster ride of statistical analysis, name puns, and potentially surprising insights. The adventure awaits as we seek to decipher the intriguing correlation between "Killing It" and TCOM stock prices.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
To investigate the perplexing connection between the popularity of the first name Killian and the stock price of Trip.com Group (TCOM), our research team embarked on a data collection journey that delved into the deepest recesses of statistical archives. We primarily sourced our data from the US Social Security Administration, where the popularity of baby names is meticulously documented, and from LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), providing us with the market data that made our analysis possible. As for the specifics of our data collection method, well, let's just say it involved a lot of late nights, gallons of coffee, and a fair amount of eyebrow-raising from the office cat.

Statistical Analysis:
With the collected data in hand, we proceeded to analyze the trends and patterns with all the rigor and enthusiasm one would expect from a group of researchers eager to uncover the mysteries of "Killing It." Our statistical analysis involved employing sophisticated techniques such as correlation analysis, time series modeling, and regression analysis. We tamed the statistical beasts prowling through our data, ensuring that our findings were robust, reliable, and, dare we say, entertaining.

Correlation Coefficient:
The cornerstone of our analysis lay in calculating the correlation coefficient between the popularity of the name Killian and TCOM's stock price. This coefficient, symbolized by the Greek letter rho (ρ), revealed the strength and direction of the relationship between the two variables. A coefficient close to 1 would indicate a strong positive correlation, while a coefficient near -1 would suggest a strong negative correlation. We were delighted to discover that the correlation coefficient was a whopping 0.9177683, signifying a remarkably high positive association between the two entities. We couldn't escape the feeling that a name like Killian was not just capturing hearts but also captivating market trends!

Significance Testing:
To ensure that our findings weren't just playing tricks on us, we subjected our results to rigorous significance testing. Our p-value, that magical number of statistical significance, gleamed brightly at p < 0.01, affirming that the relationship we unveiled was not merely a statistical ghost story but a bona fide revelation. It was a true "Eureka!" moment, with the echoes of our excitement reverberating through the hallowed halls of academic research.

Validity Checks:
Aware of the unconventional nature of our inquiry, we performed validity checks to corroborate the reliability of our findings. We scrutinized historical trends, scrutinized outliers, and conducted sensitivity analyses to ensure that our results withstood the harshest of scrutinies. It turned out that the connection between Killian and TCOM's stock performance was as solid as a rock, or perhaps as solid as a stock market trend after a sudden media frenzy.

In conclusion, our methodology, despite its slightly unorthodox nature, has provided us with the ammunition needed to unravel the enigma of "Killing It" and its surprising influence on TCOM's stock price. The adventure continues as we embark on the exhilarating journey of interpreting and analyzing our findings, armed with our wits, data, and an unhealthy obsession with name puns. Let the statistical storytelling begin!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Killian and Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9177683, r-squared of 0.8422987, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Killing It: The Killian Name Popularity and TCOM Stock Price Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study dives into the correlation between the rising popularity of the first name Killian and the stock price of Trip.com Group (TCOM) from 2004 to 2022. Our team combined data from the US Social Security Administration with LSEG Analytics to analyze this seemingly quirky relationship. The results revealed an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9177683 with statistical significance (p < 0.01), suggesting a significant association between the two variables. Our findings not only shed light on the unexpected influence of nomenclature on stock performance but also highlight the potential for unconventional indicators in financial analysis. Join us in unraveling the mysteries of "Killing It" in both the name game and stock market trends!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of finance is often characterized by complex models, intricate theories, and mountains of data - not exactly a place where one would expect to find a connection to the world of baby names. However, as in any good mystery novel, sometimes the most unlikely clues lead to the most intriguing revelations. Enter the enigmatic case of "Killing It": the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name Killian and the stock price of Trip.com Group (TCOM).
As researchers, we are accustomed to diving deep into data and scrutinizing numbers with keen precision. But who could have guessed that the rise and fall of a particular name would be so intricately linked with the ebbs and flows of an international company's stock price? Is it purely a coincidence, a cosmic joke from the financial fates, or perhaps a serendipitous insight into the hidden forces shaping the market?
In this study, we embark on a quest to unravel this unexpected connection and explore the implications it holds for the world of finance. From nosediving stock prices to skyrocketing name popularities, we navigate through the tumultuous seas of data, seeking to make sense of this peculiar intersection between social trends and market dynamics. So, buckle up and prepare for a rollercoaster ride of statistical analysis, name puns, and potentially surprising insights. The adventure awaits as we seek to decipher the intriguing correlation between "Killing It" and TCOM stock prices.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name Killian and the stock price of Trip.com Group (TCOM) from 2004 to 2022 have left us feeling both amazed and amused. The correlation coefficient of 0.9177683 suggests a near-perfect positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables, leaving us contemplating whether the power of a name goes far beyond mere identity.

Analyzing the data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we found an r-squared value of 0.8422987, indicating that over 84% of the variability in TCOM stock price can be explained by the popularity of the name Killian. It's as if each time someone named Killian reaches for the stars, TCOM stock is reaching for new heights as well.

In addition to these compelling statistics, the p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the significance of our findings. This robust level of statistical significance suggests that the observed relationship between the name Killian's popularity and TCOM stock price is not a fluke, but a genuine phenomenon worthy of further exploration.

To visually capture this striking association, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the strong correlation between the two variables. The plot showcases the synchronicity between the rise and fall of TCOM stock price and the ebbs and flows of Killian's popularity, providing a visual testament to the unexpected bond between the name game and stock market trends.

These results not only spotlight the surprising interplay between nomenclature and financial performance but also open the door to a world of unconventional indicators in the realm of financial analysis. The unexpected revelation that a name can wield such influence in the realm of stocks reminds us that amidst the labyrinth of numbers and trends, there may always be room for a dash of wit and whimsy.

As we reflect on these findings, one can't help but wonder: Are we witnessing the birth of a new era in financial analysis, where the whims of baby names hold sway over stock movements? While we may not have all the answers, we have certainly cracked open a pandora's box of possibilities. So, fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a wild ride through the unpredictable world of finance, where the impact of a name may just be the unexpected game-changer.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Killian and Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Killing It: The Killian Name Popularity and TCOM Stock Price Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study dives into the correlation between the rising popularity of the first name Killian and the stock price of Trip.com Group (TCOM) from 2004 to 2022. Our team combined data from the US Social Security Administration with LSEG Analytics to analyze this seemingly quirky relationship. The results revealed an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9177683 with statistical significance (p < 0.01), suggesting a significant association between the two variables. Our findings not only shed light on the unexpected influence of nomenclature on stock performance but also highlight the potential for unconventional indicators in financial analysis. Join us in unraveling the mysteries of "Killing It" in both the name game and stock market trends!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The impact of naming trends on seemingly unrelated economic variables has been a subject of great fascination among researchers in various fields. Smith et al. (2010) conducted a study examining the influence of popular baby names on consumer spending habits, while Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the potential impact of unique names on corporate branding strategies. These works laid the groundwork for uncovering a potential link between the popularity of the first name Killian and the stock performance of Trip.com Group (TCOM).
In "Naming and Nomics: Exploring the Economics of Baby Names," the authors unearthed surprising correlations between the rise of unconventional names and patterns in consumer behavior. Meanwhile, "Branding Bonanza: The Power of Unique Names in Corporate Identity" shed light on the influence of distinctive names in shaping public perceptions of companies. However, little did these researchers know that their explorations into the world of nomenclature would eventually intersect with the realm of stock market dynamics in the context of "Killing It" and TCOM.
As we delve further into the literature, it is essential to consider not only the factual accounts but also fictional works that may inadvertently offer insights into the obscure connections we are exploring. Could "Name Quest: The Legend of Market Influencers" or "Stockholm Syndrome: When Stocks and Names Collide" hold hidden clues within their fictional narratives? The enigmatic allure of the unknown beckons us to contemplate unconventional sources that might illuminate the unexpected relationship we are investigating.
In addition to books, let us not discount the potential influence of popular culture on our perceptions and understanding of these phenomena. Could the board game "Stock Name Shuffle" offer a playful analogy to the intricate dynamics at play, or does "Nameopoly: Navigating the Market of Monikers" hold secret strategies for identifying trends in nomenclature and their impact on financial realms? These whimsical considerations prompt us to approach our investigation with a sense of open-minded curiosity, recognizing the potential for unconventional inspiration in our pursuit of knowledge.
Now, as we embark on this intellectual journey, let us brace ourselves for the unexpected twists and turns that lie ahead. Prepare for a voyage into the realm of statistical absurdity, where the mysterious connection between "Killing It" and TCOM stock prices may just unfold before our very eyes.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name Killian and the stock price of Trip.com Group (TCOM) from 2004 to 2022 have left us feeling both amazed and amused. The correlation coefficient of 0.9177683 suggests a near-perfect positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables, leaving us contemplating whether the power of a name goes far beyond mere identity.
Analyzing the data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we found an r-squared value of 0.8422987, indicating that over 84% of the variability in TCOM stock price can be explained by the popularity of the name Killian. It's as if each time someone named Killian reaches for the stars, TCOM stock is reaching for new heights as well.
In addition to these compelling statistics, the p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the significance of our findings. This robust level of statistical significance suggests that the observed relationship between the name Killian's popularity and TCOM stock price is not a fluke, but a genuine phenomenon worthy of further exploration.
To visually capture this striking association, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the strong correlation between the two variables. The plot showcases the synchronicity between the rise and fall of TCOM stock price and the ebbs and flows of Killian's popularity, providing a visual testament to the unexpected bond between the name game and stock market trends.
These results not only spotlight the surprising interplay between nomenclature and financial performance but also open the door to a world of unconventional indicators in the realm of financial analysis. The unexpected revelation that a name can wield such influence in the realm of stocks reminds us that amidst the labyrinth of numbers and trends, there may always be room for a dash of wit and whimsy.
As we reflect on these findings, one can't help but wonder: Are we witnessing the birth of a new era in financial analysis, where the whims of baby names hold sway over stock movements? While we may not have all the answers, we have certainly cracked open a pandora's box of possibilities. So, fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a wild ride through the unpredictable world of finance, where the impact of a name may just be the unexpected game-changer.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study provide compelling evidence to support the notion that the popularity of the first name Killian is indeed correlated with the stock price of Trip.com Group (TCOM). It is remarkable that our results align with prior research that has explored the influence of unconventional names on various economic and branding phenomena. As we traverse the uncharted territory of nomenclature in the financial realm, the unlikely connection between "Killing It" and TCOM stock prices becomes increasingly conspicuous.

The literature review laid the groundwork for our investigation, drawing attention to the potential impact of unique names on consumer behavior and corporate branding. While many may have initially perceived the linkage between the name Killian and TCOM stock prices as a whimsical notion, our results uphold the seriousness of this peculiar association. The surprising correlations between unconventional names and consumer behavior predicted by previous studies are echoed in our findings, underscoring the significance of naming trends in shaping economic variables.

The unexpected twists and playful analogies presented in the literature review, which may have initially appeared as whimsical diversions, have served as thought-provoking parallels to the curious relationship we have uncovered. The fictional works and popular cultural influences that were cited in the literature review, while seemingly lighthearted in nature, have inadvertently offered insightful perspectives into the obscure connections we have investigated. This prompts us to acknowledge the potential for unconventional sources to illuminate the unexpected relationships between naming trends and financial dynamics.

Our results have affirmed the statistical absurdity alluded to in the literature review, reinforcing the notion that the mysterious connection between "Killing It" and TCOM stock prices may not be as improbable as it initially seemed. The visual representation of the strong correlation between the popularity of the name Killian and TCOM stock prices, as depicted in the scatterplot, provides a compelling testament to the unanticipated bond between the name game and stock market trends.

It is evident that our findings have extended beyond the realm of statistical curiosity, challenging traditional paradigms in financial analysis. The revelation that a name holds such sway over stock movements has broadened the landscape of potential indicators in the financial sphere. Our study has ushered in a new era of contemplating the whims of baby names as potential game-changers in the complex world of finance. As we unravel the mysteries of nomenclature in the financial realm, we invite fellow researchers to join us in exploring this uncharted territory and embracing the unexpected with a sense of open-minded curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Killian and Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Killing It: The Killian Name Popularity and TCOM Stock Price Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study dives into the correlation between the rising popularity of the first name Killian and the stock price of Trip.com Group (TCOM) from 2004 to 2022. Our team combined data from the US Social Security Administration with LSEG Analytics to analyze this seemingly quirky relationship. The results revealed an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9177683 with statistical significance (p < 0.01), suggesting a significant association between the two variables. Our findings not only shed light on the unexpected influence of nomenclature on stock performance but also highlight the potential for unconventional indicators in financial analysis. Join us in unraveling the mysteries of "Killing It" in both the name game and stock market trends!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of finance is often characterized by complex models, intricate theories, and mountains of data - not exactly a place where one would expect to find a connection to the world of baby names. However, as in any good mystery novel, sometimes the most unlikely clues lead to the most intriguing revelations. Enter the enigmatic case of "Killing It": the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name Killian and the stock price of Trip.com Group (TCOM).
As researchers, we are accustomed to diving deep into data and scrutinizing numbers with keen precision. But who could have guessed that the rise and fall of a particular name would be so intricately linked with the ebbs and flows of an international company's stock price? Is it purely a coincidence, a cosmic joke from the financial fates, or perhaps a serendipitous insight into the hidden forces shaping the market?
In this study, we embark on a quest to unravel this unexpected connection and explore the implications it holds for the world of finance. From nosediving stock prices to skyrocketing name popularities, we navigate through the tumultuous seas of data, seeking to make sense of this peculiar intersection between social trends and market dynamics. So, buckle up and prepare for a rollercoaster ride of statistical analysis, name puns, and potentially surprising insights. The adventure awaits as we seek to decipher the intriguing correlation between "Killing It" and TCOM stock prices.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name Killian and the stock price of Trip.com Group (TCOM) from 2004 to 2022 have left us feeling both amazed and amused. The correlation coefficient of 0.9177683 suggests a near-perfect positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables, leaving us contemplating whether the power of a name goes far beyond mere identity.
Analyzing the data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we found an r-squared value of 0.8422987, indicating that over 84% of the variability in TCOM stock price can be explained by the popularity of the name Killian. It's as if each time someone named Killian reaches for the stars, TCOM stock is reaching for new heights as well.
In addition to these compelling statistics, the p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the significance of our findings. This robust level of statistical significance suggests that the observed relationship between the name Killian's popularity and TCOM stock price is not a fluke, but a genuine phenomenon worthy of further exploration.
To visually capture this striking association, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the strong correlation between the two variables. The plot showcases the synchronicity between the rise and fall of TCOM stock price and the ebbs and flows of Killian's popularity, providing a visual testament to the unexpected bond between the name game and stock market trends.
These results not only spotlight the surprising interplay between nomenclature and financial performance but also open the door to a world of unconventional indicators in the realm of financial analysis. The unexpected revelation that a name can wield such influence in the realm of stocks reminds us that amidst the labyrinth of numbers and trends, there may always be room for a dash of wit and whimsy.
As we reflect on these findings, one can't help but wonder: Are we witnessing the birth of a new era in financial analysis, where the whims of baby names hold sway over stock movements? While we may not have all the answers, we have certainly cracked open a pandora's box of possibilities. So, fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a wild ride through the unpredictable world of finance, where the impact of a name may just be the unexpected game-changer.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unveiled a mesmerizing correlation between the rising popularity of the first name Killian and the stock price of Trip.com Group (TCOM). The near-perfect positive relationship, with an r-squared value of 0.8422987, showcases how "Killing It" in the name game can also mean "Killing It" in the stock market. It seems that every surge in Killian's popularity sends TCOM stock soaring to new heights, proving that there's more than meets the eye in the world of finance.

As we wrap up this investigation, it's clear that this unlikely link between a name and stock performance defies traditional financial wisdom. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings stand as sturdy as a baby name book in a lively kindergarten. The scatterplot in Figure 1 paints a vivid picture of this outlandish connection, reminding us that in the world of numbers, there's always room for a dash of spontaneity and surprise.

The implications of our research go beyond mere statistical anomalies - they beckon us to reevaluate the very foundations of financial analysis. Are we witnessing the dawn of a new era where baby names hold the key to stock market fortunes? Only time will tell, but for now, we can revel in the wondrous quirkiness of this discovery.

In the immortal words of Shakespeare, "What's in a name? That which we call a Killian by any other name would make TCOM rise as sweet." And with that, we confidently assert that no further research in this area is needed. After all, sometimes it's best to leave a good name and its stock escapades unchallenged and simply bask in the delightful absurdity of it all.





Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Killing It: The Killian Name Popularity and TCOM Stock Price Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Data Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Killing It: The Killian Name Popularity and TCOM Stock Price Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Research on Unusual Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Killing It: The Killian Name Popularity and TCOM Stock Price Connection with an abstract of This groundbreaking study dives into the correlation between the rising popularity of the first name Killian and the stock price of Trip.com Group (TCOM) from 2004 to 2022. Our team combined data from the US Social Security Administration with LSEG Analytics to analyze this seemingly quirky relationship. The results revealed an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9177683 with statistical significance (p < 0.01), suggesting a significant association between the two variables. Our findings not only shed light on the unexpected influence of nomenclature on stock performance but also highlight the potential for unconventional indicators in financial analysis. Join us in unraveling the mysteries of "Killing It" in both the name game and stock market trends!

ChatGPT:

"Killian name popularity," "Trip.com Group stock price," "correlation between name popularity and stock price," "US Social Security Administration data," "LSEG Analytics," "stock market trends," "nomenclature influence on stock performance," "unconventional indicators in financial analysis," "association between name popularity and stock price," "Killian name significance in financial analysis."

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Killian
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Killian
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Killian

Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Trip.com Group (TCOM) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM)

Correlation r = 0.9177683 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8422987 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Killian) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.1E-8. 0.0000000312615508852854400000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 3.1E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 31,988,176 random variables You don't actually need 31 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.79, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Killian (Babies born)16617218726929032330931628031056010011400152412491105911957918
Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM) (Stock price)2.122.883.667.8814.495.9818.4320.211211.7524.782344.9940.8845.126.4134.9433.8424.53




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([166,172,187,269,290,323,309,316,280,310,560,1001,1400,1524,1249,1105,911,957,918,])
array_2 = np.array([2.12,2.88,3.66,7.88,14.49,5.98,18.43,20.21,12,11.75,24.78,23,44.99,40.88,45.1,26.41,34.94,33.84,24.53,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Killian"
array_2_name = "Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 2031 · Black Variable ID: 3936 · Red Variable ID: 1889
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0