about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,833 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota and the second variable is Hollister retail store count worldwide.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As soybean crops experienced a growth spurt from GMO use, it led to a surplus of soy material for clothing production. This, in turn, lowered the cost of manufacturing stylish yet affordable soy-based clothing, giving Hollister the perfect opportunity to expand its store count worldwide. You could say it really "soy-ced" up their expansion plans!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a serene South Dakota soybean field with a farmer standing proudly next to rows of vibrant, genetically modified soybean plants. The lush green leaves of the plants stretch out under the clear blue sky. In the distance, depict a Hollister retail store nestled in a bustling international city, with its iconic logo shining brightly against the urban skyline. Emphasize the contrast between the tranquil agricultural setting and the bustling urban landscape. The image should be rendered in a cute and captivating visual style akin to colorful illustrations, evoking a sense of wonder and vibrancy. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Symbolism Cutsy graphics Cute cartoon Symbolism Cubism
ChatGPT: Cutsy graphics

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota and Hollister retail store count worldwide together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a South Dakota soybean field, a farmer proudly stands next to rows of genetically modified soybean plants, their lush green leaves stretching out under the clear blue sky. In the distance, a Hollister retail store sits nestled in a bustling international city, its iconic logo shining brightly against the urban skyline.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cutsy graphics ] and depicting this scene: In a South Dakota soybean field, a farmer proudly stands next to rows of genetically modified soybean plants, their lush green leaves stretching out under the clear blue sky. In the distance, a Hollister retail store sits nestled in a bustling international city, its iconic logo shining brightly against the urban skyline. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a serene South Dakota soybean field with a farmer standing proudly next to rows of vibrant, genetically modified soybean plants. The lush green leaves of the plants stretch out under the clear blue sky. In the distance, depict a Hollister retail store nestled in a bustling international city, with its iconic logo shining brightly against the urban skyline. Emphasize the contrast between the tranquil agricultural setting and the bustling urban landscape. The image should be rendered in a cute and captivating visual style akin to colorful illustrations, evoking a sense of wonder and vibrancy.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota caused Hollister retail store count worldwide to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Genetically Modified Goop: Grasping the Galactic Connection between Soybeans and Surrealistic Stores

The Journal of Interplanetary Agricultural Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from USDA and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8193655 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Goop: Grasping the Galactic Connection between Soybeans and Surrealistic Stores

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study sets out to investigate a rather peculiar link between the use of genetically modified soybeans in South Dakota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. With a blend of agricultural and retail data, we embark on a journey through the galaxies of commerce to uncover whether there is a cosmic correlation lurking beneath the surface. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, our analysis yields a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8193655 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022. Our findings will tickle the fancy of those intrigued by the far-reaching implications of GMOs and the strange orbits of global retail expansion.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Goop: Grasping the Galactic Connection between Soybeans and Surrealistic Stores

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study sets out to investigate a rather peculiar link between the use of genetically modified soybeans in South Dakota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. With a blend of agricultural and retail data, we embark on a journey through the galaxies of commerce to uncover whether there is a cosmic correlation lurking beneath the surface. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, our analysis yields a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8193655 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022. Our findings will tickle the fancy of those intrigued by the far-reaching implications of GMOs and the strange orbits of global retail expansion.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and unexpected phenomena seems to resemble a complex dance, with steps that surprise and entice. In this study, we delve deep into the curious interplay between the cultivation of GMO soybeans in South Dakota and the global spread of Hollister retail stores. The enigmatic connection between these two seemingly disparate variables has puzzled many, prompting us to embark on a scientific escapade to unravel the mysteries that lie beneath the surface.

As we venture into this unusual realm of investigation, we are reminded of the words of physicist Richard Feynman, who quipped, "Nature makes use of the laws of probability. We ought to do the same." The whimsical nature of this research endeavor embodies Feynman's sentiment, as we traverse the realms of agriculture and retail with a zeal for uncovering hidden patterns and unexpected relationships.

Statistics, like a magician's sleight of hand, can reveal the hidden connections between variables and captivate the curious minds of researchers. Our data, sourced from the USDA and Statista, has allowed us to peer into the cosmic dance of soybean cultivation and the proliferation of Hollister stores. As we crunch the numbers and manipulate the variables, the quest for understanding yields promising results that are both intriguing and statistically robust.

Thus, with an air of anticipation and a sprinkle of scientific curiosity, we invite you to join us on this scientific adventure as we untangle the genetic goop and peer into the surrealistic world of global commerce. The findings that await us are sure to be as surprising as a sudden appearance of a retail outlet in the midst of a soybean field.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Goop: Grasping the Galactic Connection between Soybeans and Surrealistic Stores

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study sets out to investigate a rather peculiar link between the use of genetically modified soybeans in South Dakota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. With a blend of agricultural and retail data, we embark on a journey through the galaxies of commerce to uncover whether there is a cosmic correlation lurking beneath the surface. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, our analysis yields a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8193655 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022. Our findings will tickle the fancy of those intrigued by the far-reaching implications of GMOs and the strange orbits of global retail expansion.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and unexpected phenomena seems to resemble a complex dance, with steps that surprise and entice. In this study, we delve deep into the curious interplay between the cultivation of GMO soybeans in South Dakota and the global spread of Hollister retail stores. The enigmatic connection between these two seemingly disparate variables has puzzled many, prompting us to embark on a scientific escapade to unravel the mysteries that lie beneath the surface.
As we venture into this unusual realm of investigation, we are reminded of the words of physicist Richard Feynman, who quipped, "Nature makes use of the laws of probability. We ought to do the same." The whimsical nature of this research endeavor embodies Feynman's sentiment, as we traverse the realms of agriculture and retail with a zeal for uncovering hidden patterns and unexpected relationships.
Statistics, like a magician's sleight of hand, can reveal the hidden connections between variables and captivate the curious minds of researchers. Our data, sourced from the USDA and Statista, has allowed us to peer into the cosmic dance of soybean cultivation and the proliferation of Hollister stores. As we crunch the numbers and manipulate the variables, the quest for understanding yields promising results that are both intriguing and statistically robust.
Thus, with an air of anticipation and a sprinkle of scientific curiosity, we invite you to join us on this scientific adventure as we untangle the genetic goop and peer into the surrealistic world of global commerce. The findings that await us are sure to be as surprising as a sudden appearance of a retail outlet in the midst of a soybean field.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The authors find that the relationship between genetically modified soybeans and retail store proliferation has been an area of growing interest in recent years. Smith, in "The Galactic Influence of Genetically Modified Organisms," observes an intriguing pattern of soybean cultivation and the expansion of retail chains, sparking curiosity among researchers about the underlying forces at play. Similarly, Doe, in "Unraveling the Mysteries of Retail Ecology," notes the surprising interconnectedness between agricultural practices and retail establishment growth, prompting further investigation into this enigmatic web of relations. Jones, in "The Cosmic Dance of Commerce," contributes to the literature by examining the potential cosmic correlations between agricultural commodities and retail expansion, shedding light on the cosmic dance of commerce that transcends traditional boundaries.

Further delving into the realm of agribusiness and retail dynamics, "The Economics of GMO Soybeans" by Baker and Smith offers a comprehensive analysis of the economic implications of genetically modified soybeans in the global market. Meanwhile, "Retail Revolution: How Commerce Shapes the World" by Johnson and Clark provides a thorough exploration of the various factors influencing retail industry growth, including potential unforeseen influences such as agricultural practices.

Turning to fiction, the works of Douglas Adams, particularly "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," evoke a sense of cosmic wonder and interconnectedness that parallels the unexpected link between soybeans and retail stores. In a similar vein, the whimsical world of Terry Pratchett's "Discworld" series offers a lighthearted portrayal of complex interconnections and causality that may resonate with the peculiar relationship under investigation.

While not directly related to the topic at hand, the films "Field of Dreams" and "The Devil Wears Prada" present narratives that, in some surrealistic or metaphorical sense, mirror the unexpected juxtaposition of soybean fields and retail emporiums. These cinematic works, though not scientific in nature, capture the imagination and playfully tease at the notion of improbable connections in the world of agriculture and commerce.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista . You used data from 2000 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Goop: Grasping the Galactic Connection between Soybeans and Surrealistic Stores

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study sets out to investigate a rather peculiar link between the use of genetically modified soybeans in South Dakota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. With a blend of agricultural and retail data, we embark on a journey through the galaxies of commerce to uncover whether there is a cosmic correlation lurking beneath the surface. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, our analysis yields a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8193655 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022. Our findings will tickle the fancy of those intrigued by the far-reaching implications of GMOs and the strange orbits of global retail expansion.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and unexpected phenomena seems to resemble a complex dance, with steps that surprise and entice. In this study, we delve deep into the curious interplay between the cultivation of GMO soybeans in South Dakota and the global spread of Hollister retail stores. The enigmatic connection between these two seemingly disparate variables has puzzled many, prompting us to embark on a scientific escapade to unravel the mysteries that lie beneath the surface.
As we venture into this unusual realm of investigation, we are reminded of the words of physicist Richard Feynman, who quipped, "Nature makes use of the laws of probability. We ought to do the same." The whimsical nature of this research endeavor embodies Feynman's sentiment, as we traverse the realms of agriculture and retail with a zeal for uncovering hidden patterns and unexpected relationships.
Statistics, like a magician's sleight of hand, can reveal the hidden connections between variables and captivate the curious minds of researchers. Our data, sourced from the USDA and Statista, has allowed us to peer into the cosmic dance of soybean cultivation and the proliferation of Hollister stores. As we crunch the numbers and manipulate the variables, the quest for understanding yields promising results that are both intriguing and statistically robust.
Thus, with an air of anticipation and a sprinkle of scientific curiosity, we invite you to join us on this scientific adventure as we untangle the genetic goop and peer into the surrealistic world of global commerce. The findings that await us are sure to be as surprising as a sudden appearance of a retail outlet in the midst of a soybean field.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the confounding conundrum of the connection between genetically modified soybeans and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores, we embarked on a methodological odyssey that involved a blend of agricultural and retail data. The first step in this perplexing pursuit was the acquisition of GMO soybean usage data in South Dakota. Using a combination of telepathy, quantum entanglement, and a handful of reliable internet sources such as the USDA, we extracted annual data on the cultivation of genetically modified soybeans from 2000 to 2022.

Next, we set our sights on the worldly expanse of Hollister retail stores, with their eclectic mix of fashion and enigma. Traversing the digital cosmos, we extracted the global count of Hollister stores from the confines of Statista's vast data repository. The peculiar dance of data collection involved delicate maneuvers akin to a cosmic ballet, as we pooled information on the dispersion of these retail establishments across the years under scrutiny.

With our data in hand, we navigated the treacherous terrain of statistical analysis, employing the venerable tools of correlation and regression. Like intrepid explorers charting uncharted territories, we ventured into the tangled thicket of data points, mindful of the treacherous pitfalls of spurious correlations and confounding variables that lurked in the shadows.

Utilizing the stalwart software packages of statistical analysis, we calculated correlation coefficients and p-values with the precision of a digitally enhanced quasar. Our explorations of the data revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8193655 and a p-value of less than 0.01, signaling a statistically significant relationship that tantalized the senses. The cosmic dance between genetically modified soybeans in South Dakota and the emergence of Hollister stores on the global stage beckoned us with its enigmatic allure, yielding results that sparked the imagination and stirred the scientific soul.

The intertwining of agriculture and commerce, like a celestial waltz, intrigued us as we embarked on this peculiar journey. The methods employed in this investigation, though whimsical in description, upheld the rigors of scientific inquiry and yielded findings that beguiled the mind with their unexpected harmony.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista .

For the time period 2000 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8193655, r-squared of 0.6713599, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Goop: Grasping the Galactic Connection between Soybeans and Surrealistic Stores

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study sets out to investigate a rather peculiar link between the use of genetically modified soybeans in South Dakota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. With a blend of agricultural and retail data, we embark on a journey through the galaxies of commerce to uncover whether there is a cosmic correlation lurking beneath the surface. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, our analysis yields a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8193655 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022. Our findings will tickle the fancy of those intrigued by the far-reaching implications of GMOs and the strange orbits of global retail expansion.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and unexpected phenomena seems to resemble a complex dance, with steps that surprise and entice. In this study, we delve deep into the curious interplay between the cultivation of GMO soybeans in South Dakota and the global spread of Hollister retail stores. The enigmatic connection between these two seemingly disparate variables has puzzled many, prompting us to embark on a scientific escapade to unravel the mysteries that lie beneath the surface.
As we venture into this unusual realm of investigation, we are reminded of the words of physicist Richard Feynman, who quipped, "Nature makes use of the laws of probability. We ought to do the same." The whimsical nature of this research endeavor embodies Feynman's sentiment, as we traverse the realms of agriculture and retail with a zeal for uncovering hidden patterns and unexpected relationships.
Statistics, like a magician's sleight of hand, can reveal the hidden connections between variables and captivate the curious minds of researchers. Our data, sourced from the USDA and Statista, has allowed us to peer into the cosmic dance of soybean cultivation and the proliferation of Hollister stores. As we crunch the numbers and manipulate the variables, the quest for understanding yields promising results that are both intriguing and statistically robust.
Thus, with an air of anticipation and a sprinkle of scientific curiosity, we invite you to join us on this scientific adventure as we untangle the genetic goop and peer into the surrealistic world of global commerce. The findings that await us are sure to be as surprising as a sudden appearance of a retail outlet in the midst of a soybean field.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The extensive data analysis of the relationship between genetically modified soybeans in South Dakota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide has revealed a remarkably strong correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.8193655 suggests a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding challenges the traditional notions of causality and prompts us to ponder the cosmic forces at play.

The r-squared value of 0.6713599 indicates that approximately 67.14% of the variability in the number of Hollister stores can be explained by the use of GMO soybeans in South Dakota. This substantial proportion of variation elucidates the gravitational pull that GMO soybeans exert on the retail universe, drawing in Hollister stores like celestial bodies orbiting a central force.

Furthermore, with a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis and assert that the observed correlation is statistically significant. This veritable "Eureka!" moment bolsters our confidence in the cosmic connection we have uncovered and serves as a testament to the power of statistical inquiry in unraveling peculiar phenomena.

Figure 1, the scatterplot illustrating the relationship between GMO soybean use in South Dakota and Hollister retail store count worldwide, visually encapsulates the striking correlation uncovered in our analysis. The data points align in a harmonious dance, painting a picture of interconnectedness that transcends conventional understanding. This visual representation serves as a beacon of intrigue in the otherwise uncharted waters of GMO-related retail phenomena.

In conclusion, our findings present a compelling case for the existence of a cosmic connection between genetically modified soybeans and the expansion of Hollister stores on a global scale. This revelation invites further inquiry and sparks a sense of wonder at the unexpected twists and turns of the commercial cosmos. As we peer through the lens of statistics, we are reminded of the words of physicist Niels Bohr, who aptly remarked, "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Indeed, the future implications of our findings are as enigmatic as the forces that have shaped this peculiar correlation.

The unexpected synchronicity between soybean cultivation and the retail realm offers a rich tapestry of scientific mystique, beckoning for continued exploration and contemplation. The interplay of agricultural genetics and commercial dynamics reveals a cosmic ballet that transcends conventional boundaries, capturing the imaginations of researchers and enthusiasts alike.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Goop: Grasping the Galactic Connection between Soybeans and Surrealistic Stores

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study sets out to investigate a rather peculiar link between the use of genetically modified soybeans in South Dakota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. With a blend of agricultural and retail data, we embark on a journey through the galaxies of commerce to uncover whether there is a cosmic correlation lurking beneath the surface. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, our analysis yields a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8193655 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022. Our findings will tickle the fancy of those intrigued by the far-reaching implications of GMOs and the strange orbits of global retail expansion.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors find that the relationship between genetically modified soybeans and retail store proliferation has been an area of growing interest in recent years. Smith, in "The Galactic Influence of Genetically Modified Organisms," observes an intriguing pattern of soybean cultivation and the expansion of retail chains, sparking curiosity among researchers about the underlying forces at play. Similarly, Doe, in "Unraveling the Mysteries of Retail Ecology," notes the surprising interconnectedness between agricultural practices and retail establishment growth, prompting further investigation into this enigmatic web of relations. Jones, in "The Cosmic Dance of Commerce," contributes to the literature by examining the potential cosmic correlations between agricultural commodities and retail expansion, shedding light on the cosmic dance of commerce that transcends traditional boundaries.
Further delving into the realm of agribusiness and retail dynamics, "The Economics of GMO Soybeans" by Baker and Smith offers a comprehensive analysis of the economic implications of genetically modified soybeans in the global market. Meanwhile, "Retail Revolution: How Commerce Shapes the World" by Johnson and Clark provides a thorough exploration of the various factors influencing retail industry growth, including potential unforeseen influences such as agricultural practices.
Turning to fiction, the works of Douglas Adams, particularly "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," evoke a sense of cosmic wonder and interconnectedness that parallels the unexpected link between soybeans and retail stores. In a similar vein, the whimsical world of Terry Pratchett's "Discworld" series offers a lighthearted portrayal of complex interconnections and causality that may resonate with the peculiar relationship under investigation.
While not directly related to the topic at hand, the films "Field of Dreams" and "The Devil Wears Prada" present narratives that, in some surrealistic or metaphorical sense, mirror the unexpected juxtaposition of soybean fields and retail emporiums. These cinematic works, though not scientific in nature, capture the imagination and playfully tease at the notion of improbable connections in the world of agriculture and commerce.

[[RESULTS]]
The extensive data analysis of the relationship between genetically modified soybeans in South Dakota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide has revealed a remarkably strong correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.8193655 suggests a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding challenges the traditional notions of causality and prompts us to ponder the cosmic forces at play.
The r-squared value of 0.6713599 indicates that approximately 67.14% of the variability in the number of Hollister stores can be explained by the use of GMO soybeans in South Dakota. This substantial proportion of variation elucidates the gravitational pull that GMO soybeans exert on the retail universe, drawing in Hollister stores like celestial bodies orbiting a central force.
Furthermore, with a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis and assert that the observed correlation is statistically significant. This veritable "Eureka!" moment bolsters our confidence in the cosmic connection we have uncovered and serves as a testament to the power of statistical inquiry in unraveling peculiar phenomena.
Figure 1, the scatterplot illustrating the relationship between GMO soybean use in South Dakota and Hollister retail store count worldwide, visually encapsulates the striking correlation uncovered in our analysis. The data points align in a harmonious dance, painting a picture of interconnectedness that transcends conventional understanding. This visual representation serves as a beacon of intrigue in the otherwise uncharted waters of GMO-related retail phenomena.
In conclusion, our findings present a compelling case for the existence of a cosmic connection between genetically modified soybeans and the expansion of Hollister stores on a global scale. This revelation invites further inquiry and sparks a sense of wonder at the unexpected twists and turns of the commercial cosmos. As we peer through the lens of statistics, we are reminded of the words of physicist Niels Bohr, who aptly remarked, "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Indeed, the future implications of our findings are as enigmatic as the forces that have shaped this peculiar correlation.
The unexpected synchronicity between soybean cultivation and the retail realm offers a rich tapestry of scientific mystique, beckoning for continued exploration and contemplation. The interplay of agricultural genetics and commercial dynamics reveals a cosmic ballet that transcends conventional boundaries, capturing the imaginations of researchers and enthusiasts alike.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study not only corroborate the prior research on the connection between genetically modified soybeans and retail store proliferation but also unearth a cosmic correlation that challenges conventional understanding. Drawing from the literary inspirations of Smith, Doe, and Jones, who hinted at a mysterious web of relations between agriculture and retail, our results serve as a gravitational force pulling the cosmic dance of commerce into sharp focus. While the whimsical parallels with the works of Douglas Adams and Terry Pratchett may have seemed like fiction, our study brings these surrealistic musings into the realm of statistical inquiry.

Our research not only quantifies the correlation but also captures the essence of the unexpected juxtaposition between soybean fields and retail emporiums, reminiscent of the surrealistic or metaphorical narratives in "Field of Dreams" and "The Devil Wears Prada." These unexpected parallels bespeak the cosmic wonder and interconnectedness that resonates with the peculiar relationship under investigation.

The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8193655 and the substantial r-squared value of 0.6713599 underscore the robust positive relationship between genetically modified soybeans in South Dakota and the proliferation of Hollister stores worldwide. These results not only support the prior literature's speculations about the interconnectedness of agricultural practices and retail establishment growth but also infuse the narrative with a dash of scientific mystique and statistical intrigue. The visual representation of the relationship in the scatterplot mirrors the harmonious dance of interconnectedness, reminiscent of celestial bodies orbiting a central force, resonating with the unexpected twists and turns of the commercial cosmos.

The implications of our findings extend beyond the confines of conventional causality, fostering a sense of wonder at the cosmic forces that shape this peculiar correlation. As we delve deeper into the cosmic ballet between agricultural genetics and commercial dynamics, our study invites further exploration and contemplation, echoing the sentiments of physicist Niels Bohr: "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." The future implications of this cosmic correlation are as enigmatic as the forces that have shaped it, beckoning for continued inquiry into the surrealistic realms of GMO-related retail phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Goop: Grasping the Galactic Connection between Soybeans and Surrealistic Stores

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study sets out to investigate a rather peculiar link between the use of genetically modified soybeans in South Dakota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. With a blend of agricultural and retail data, we embark on a journey through the galaxies of commerce to uncover whether there is a cosmic correlation lurking beneath the surface. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, our analysis yields a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8193655 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022. Our findings will tickle the fancy of those intrigued by the far-reaching implications of GMOs and the strange orbits of global retail expansion.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and unexpected phenomena seems to resemble a complex dance, with steps that surprise and entice. In this study, we delve deep into the curious interplay between the cultivation of GMO soybeans in South Dakota and the global spread of Hollister retail stores. The enigmatic connection between these two seemingly disparate variables has puzzled many, prompting us to embark on a scientific escapade to unravel the mysteries that lie beneath the surface.
As we venture into this unusual realm of investigation, we are reminded of the words of physicist Richard Feynman, who quipped, "Nature makes use of the laws of probability. We ought to do the same." The whimsical nature of this research endeavor embodies Feynman's sentiment, as we traverse the realms of agriculture and retail with a zeal for uncovering hidden patterns and unexpected relationships.
Statistics, like a magician's sleight of hand, can reveal the hidden connections between variables and captivate the curious minds of researchers. Our data, sourced from the USDA and Statista, has allowed us to peer into the cosmic dance of soybean cultivation and the proliferation of Hollister stores. As we crunch the numbers and manipulate the variables, the quest for understanding yields promising results that are both intriguing and statistically robust.
Thus, with an air of anticipation and a sprinkle of scientific curiosity, we invite you to join us on this scientific adventure as we untangle the genetic goop and peer into the surrealistic world of global commerce. The findings that await us are sure to be as surprising as a sudden appearance of a retail outlet in the midst of a soybean field.

[[RESULTS]]
The extensive data analysis of the relationship between genetically modified soybeans in South Dakota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide has revealed a remarkably strong correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.8193655 suggests a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding challenges the traditional notions of causality and prompts us to ponder the cosmic forces at play.
The r-squared value of 0.6713599 indicates that approximately 67.14% of the variability in the number of Hollister stores can be explained by the use of GMO soybeans in South Dakota. This substantial proportion of variation elucidates the gravitational pull that GMO soybeans exert on the retail universe, drawing in Hollister stores like celestial bodies orbiting a central force.
Furthermore, with a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis and assert that the observed correlation is statistically significant. This veritable "Eureka!" moment bolsters our confidence in the cosmic connection we have uncovered and serves as a testament to the power of statistical inquiry in unraveling peculiar phenomena.
Figure 1, the scatterplot illustrating the relationship between GMO soybean use in South Dakota and Hollister retail store count worldwide, visually encapsulates the striking correlation uncovered in our analysis. The data points align in a harmonious dance, painting a picture of interconnectedness that transcends conventional understanding. This visual representation serves as a beacon of intrigue in the otherwise uncharted waters of GMO-related retail phenomena.
In conclusion, our findings present a compelling case for the existence of a cosmic connection between genetically modified soybeans and the expansion of Hollister stores on a global scale. This revelation invites further inquiry and sparks a sense of wonder at the unexpected twists and turns of the commercial cosmos. As we peer through the lens of statistics, we are reminded of the words of physicist Niels Bohr, who aptly remarked, "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Indeed, the future implications of our findings are as enigmatic as the forces that have shaped this peculiar correlation.
The unexpected synchronicity between soybean cultivation and the retail realm offers a rich tapestry of scientific mystique, beckoning for continued exploration and contemplation. The interplay of agricultural genetics and commercial dynamics reveals a cosmic ballet that transcends conventional boundaries, capturing the imaginations of researchers and enthusiasts alike.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the grand symphony of scientific discovery, our investigation has unveiled a marvelously eccentric melody that resonates through the fields of South Dakota and reverberates across the aisles of Hollister stores worldwide. The robust correlation between genetically modified soybeans and the proliferation of trendy retail outlets is as surprising as stumbling upon a crop circle in a fashion runway.

Our findings, like a statistical sleight of hand, have captivated the audience of the research community, leaving them both puzzled and enchanted by the cosmic dance between agriculture and commerce. The substantial r-squared value of 0.6713599 shines as brightly as a supernova, illuminating the vast scope of impact that GMO soybeans wield over the retail constellation.

With a p-value less than 0.01, we confidently reject the bland hypothesis that these variables are as unrelated as mismatched socks, and instead embrace the flavorful notion of a magnetic pull between soybeans and stylish tees. Indeed, our results are statistically significant, proving that this cosmic connection is no mere shooting star, but a celestial phenomenon worthy of further investigation.

Our visualization of the correlation in Figure 1 is akin to a surrealist painting, blending the structured data points with the whimsy of interconnectedness. As researchers, we find ourselves suspended in the enigmatic limbo that lies between correlation and causation, contemplating the cosmic choreography that orchestrates the expansion of Hollister stores.

In light of these findings, we assert with unwavering confidence that no further research is needed in this area. The harmonious relationship between GMO soybeans and Hollister stores has been demystified, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the quirky quirks of the scientific universe. As skeptical as a cat observing quantum mechanics, we have purred in satisfaction at the revelation of this cosmic correlation, and now lay this peculiar puzzle to rest.

The cosmic connection has been untangled, the statistical constellations have aligned, and the time has come for us to bid adieu to this delightful interplay between agriculture and retail. As we bid farewell to this peculiar cosmic ballet, we do so with a twinkle in our eye and a newfound reverence for the unexpected wonders that science continues to unveil.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Genetically Modified Goop: Grasping the Galactic Connection between Soybeans and Surrealistic Stores. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Interplanetary Agricultural Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Genetically Modified Goop: Grasping the Galactic Connection between Soybeans and Surrealistic Stores. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Interstellar Agricultural Advancement


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Genetically Modified Goop: Grasping the Galactic Connection between Soybeans and Surrealistic Stores with an abstract of This study sets out to investigate a rather peculiar link between the use of genetically modified soybeans in South Dakota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. With a blend of agricultural and retail data, we embark on a journey through the galaxies of commerce to uncover whether there is a cosmic correlation lurking beneath the surface. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, our analysis yields a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8193655 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022. Our findings will tickle the fancy of those intrigued by the far-reaching implications of GMOs and the strange orbits of global retail expansion.

ChatGPT:

genetically modified soybeans, South Dakota, Hollister retail stores, agricultural data, retail data, USDA, Statista, correlation coefficient, p-value, GMOs, global retail expansion, cosmic correlation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota
Detailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in South Dakota that are genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota

Hollister retail store count worldwide
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Hollister retail store count worldwide

Correlation r = 0.8193655 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6713599 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hollister retail store count worldwide) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota) over the 23 years from 2000 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.7E-6. 0.0000017334714059725520000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 0.00017% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 576,877 random variables You don't actually need 576 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.61, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota (GMO soybeans %)6880899195959397979898989897979696969793959496
Hollister retail store count worldwide (Store count)53288167249309383447510525540571589587568553543538542546497505529




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([68,80,89,91,95,95,93,97,97,98,98,98,98,97,97,96,96,96,97,93,95,94,96,])
array_2 = np.array([5,32,88,167,249,309,383,447,510,525,540,571,589,587,568,553,543,538,542,546,497,505,529,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota"
array_2_name = "Hollister retail store count worldwide"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 1833 · Black Variable ID: 825 · Red Variable ID: 176
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0