about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,801 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Nebraska and the second variable is Google searches for 'n95 mask'.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Nebraska increased, more students started to fluently speak in exotic accents. This led to a sudden surge in mask production as Hollywood realized there was a high demand for blockbuster movies featuring masked language experts, like "The Masquerade of Monte Cristo" and "The Phantom of the Opera: International Linguist Edition." This, in turn, sparked a nationwide craze for N95 masks, as people clamored to imitate their favorite linguistic superheroes, creating a language barrier not even viruses could penetrate! The verb to mask-querade has taken on a whole new meaning in the theatrical world of linguistics!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of an atmospheric university classroom bathed in the dramatic contrasts of chiaroscuro lighting. Show a group of foreign language and literature teachers deeply engrossed in a spirited discussion. A few of them are depicted on their laptops, visibly searching for 'n95 mask' on Google, conveying a sense of concern in the current situation. The visual should capture the tension between the scholarly engagement and the real-world worries, evoking a sense of juxtaposition and contemplation. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Nebraska and Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Macabre Art nouveau Vaporwave Woodblock painting Charcoal
ChatGPT: Chiaroscuro

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Nebraska and Google searches for 'n95 mask' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy university classroom in Nebraska, a group of foreign language and literature teachers are engaged in a lively discussion. Meanwhile, on their laptops, a few of them are shown searching for 'n95 mask' on Google, perhaps concerned about the current situation.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Chiaroscuro ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy university classroom in Nebraska, a group of foreign language and literature teachers are engaged in a lively discussion. Meanwhile, on their laptops, a few of them are shown searching for 'n95 mask' on Google, perhaps concerned about the current situation. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of an atmospheric university classroom bathed in the dramatic contrasts of chiaroscuro lighting. Show a group of foreign language and literature teachers deeply engrossed in a spirited discussion. A few of them are depicted on their laptops, visibly searching for 'n95 mask' on Google, conveying a sense of concern in the current situation. The visual should capture the tension between the scholarly engagement and the real-world worries, evoking a sense of juxtaposition and contemplation.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Nebraska caused n95 mask (Google searches for 'n95 mask') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Nexus of Nebraska's University Language Lecturers and N95 Mask Mysteries

Journal of Linguistic Puzzles and Protective Gear

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Nebraska and Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6324163 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Nexus of Nebraska's University Language Lecturers and N95 Mask Mysteries

[[ABSTRACT]]
The enigmatic relationship between the abundance of university foreign language and literature instructors in the state of Nebraska and the public's interest in N95 masks sparks an intriguing inquiry. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the count of language educators and Google Trends to measure search interest in N95 masks, our study unveils a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.6324163 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning from 2005 to 2022. This connection, while not immediately intuitive, suggests a complex interplay between language pedagogy and public health concerns, distinctly fascinating yet confoundingly perplexing. Our findings open a Pandora's box of possibilities, shedding light on the language-laden linkage to respiratory protection, leaving much to contemplate and unravel.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Nebraska and Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Nexus of Nebraska's University Language Lecturers and N95 Mask Mysteries

[[ABSTRACT]]
The enigmatic relationship between the abundance of university foreign language and literature instructors in the state of Nebraska and the public's interest in N95 masks sparks an intriguing inquiry. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the count of language educators and Google Trends to measure search interest in N95 masks, our study unveils a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.6324163 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning from 2005 to 2022. This connection, while not immediately intuitive, suggests a complex interplay between language pedagogy and public health concerns, distinctly fascinating yet confoundingly perplexing. Our findings open a Pandora's box of possibilities, shedding light on the language-laden linkage to respiratory protection, leaving much to contemplate and unravel.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
The intersection of academia and public curiosity often yields unexpected and intriguing connections, and the peculiar correlation between the number of university foreign language and literature instructors in Nebraska and the public's interest in N95 masks stands as a testament to this adage. While it may seem implausible that the teaching of French, Spanish, German, and other languages could have any bearing on the public's interest in respiratory protection, our study delves into this enigmatic relationship to unmask the underlying dynamics.

As researchers, we often find ourselves in a linguistic labyrinth, navigating through the mazes of data and insights to uncover hidden patterns and correlations. The Bureau of Labor Statistics grants us passage into the realm of academia, providing a trove of data on the count of language educators in the state of Nebraska, while Google Trends offers a window into the ever-fluctuating realm of public interest, particularly in the elusive realm of N95 masks. Our study melds these disparate datasets, forging a bridge between the esoteric world of language pedagogy and the palpable realm of public health concerns.

The allure of the inexplicable beckons us, spurring our inquiry into the dimensions of this unusual nexus. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.6324163, accompanied by a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over a seventeen-year period, invokes a sense of fascination and bewilderment. It is akin to stumbling upon an unexpected treasure trove hidden in plain sight, prompting us to unravel the threads of this peculiar tapestry.

One might be inclined to dismiss this correlation as mere happenstance, a statistical quirk dancing on the fringes of significance. However, our findings urge us to resist such hasty judgments. The interplay between language educators and public interest in respiratory protection emerges as a compelling subject for exploration, inviting us to dig deeper and unravel the peculiarities that underpin this unexpected connection.

In the following sections, we embark on an in-depth analysis of this uncharted territory, untangling the intricate web of factors that give rise to this connection. Our foray into this uncharted territory promises to shed light on the cryptic linkage between language education and public health, challenging conventional wisdom and beckoning us to reimagine the underlying dynamics. Join us on this academic odyssey as we navigate the labyrinthine corridors of academia and public interest, venturing into the intersecting realms of language pedagogy and public health concern.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Nebraska and Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Nexus of Nebraska's University Language Lecturers and N95 Mask Mysteries

[[ABSTRACT]]
The enigmatic relationship between the abundance of university foreign language and literature instructors in the state of Nebraska and the public's interest in N95 masks sparks an intriguing inquiry. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the count of language educators and Google Trends to measure search interest in N95 masks, our study unveils a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.6324163 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning from 2005 to 2022. This connection, while not immediately intuitive, suggests a complex interplay between language pedagogy and public health concerns, distinctly fascinating yet confoundingly perplexing. Our findings open a Pandora's box of possibilities, shedding light on the language-laden linkage to respiratory protection, leaving much to contemplate and unravel.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of academia and public curiosity often yields unexpected and intriguing connections, and the peculiar correlation between the number of university foreign language and literature instructors in Nebraska and the public's interest in N95 masks stands as a testament to this adage. While it may seem implausible that the teaching of French, Spanish, German, and other languages could have any bearing on the public's interest in respiratory protection, our study delves into this enigmatic relationship to unmask the underlying dynamics.
As researchers, we often find ourselves in a linguistic labyrinth, navigating through the mazes of data and insights to uncover hidden patterns and correlations. The Bureau of Labor Statistics grants us passage into the realm of academia, providing a trove of data on the count of language educators in the state of Nebraska, while Google Trends offers a window into the ever-fluctuating realm of public interest, particularly in the elusive realm of N95 masks. Our study melds these disparate datasets, forging a bridge between the esoteric world of language pedagogy and the palpable realm of public health concerns.
The allure of the inexplicable beckons us, spurring our inquiry into the dimensions of this unusual nexus. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.6324163, accompanied by a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over a seventeen-year period, invokes a sense of fascination and bewilderment. It is akin to stumbling upon an unexpected treasure trove hidden in plain sight, prompting us to unravel the threads of this peculiar tapestry.
One might be inclined to dismiss this correlation as mere happenstance, a statistical quirk dancing on the fringes of significance. However, our findings urge us to resist such hasty judgments. The interplay between language educators and public interest in respiratory protection emerges as a compelling subject for exploration, inviting us to dig deeper and unravel the peculiarities that underpin this unexpected connection.
In the following sections, we embark on an in-depth analysis of this uncharted territory, untangling the intricate web of factors that give rise to this connection. Our foray into this uncharted territory promises to shed light on the cryptic linkage between language education and public health, challenging conventional wisdom and beckoning us to reimagine the underlying dynamics. Join us on this academic odyssey as we navigate the labyrinthine corridors of academia and public interest, venturing into the intersecting realms of language pedagogy and public health concern.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The interconnectedness of university foreign language and literature instructors in Nebraska and the public's interest in N95 masks has sparked an array of research inquiries, prompting scholarly investigations into this unexpected correlation. Smith et al. (2018) delved into the enigmatic world of language education and its latent implications, underscoring the complex web of factors that shape public preferences for respiratory protection. Doe's (2016) comprehensive analysis of linguistic influences on public health behaviors offers a nuanced perspective, shedding light on the subtleties that underpin this peculiar connection. Jones and colleagues (2020) conducted a thorough exploration of language pedagogy and its reverberations in public consciousness, demonstrating the intricate interplay between linguistic exposure and respiratory precautions.

Moving beyond the realm of scholarly articles, influential non-fiction works such as "The Language Instinct" by Steven Pinker and "The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks" by Rebecca Skloot offer tangential insights into the interplay between language, culture, and health. These seminal works serve as a bridge, offering indirect commentary on the convoluted relationship between language education and public health consciousness.

In exploring the fiction domain, the works of Gabriel Garcia Marquez, such as "One Hundred Years of Solitude," and Jhumpa Lahiri's "Interpreter of Maladies," present immersive narratives that delve into the rich tapestry of language and culture, albeit in realms distant from the tangible concerns of respiratory protection. Yet, amidst the hallowed halls of literature, threads of linguistic intrigue entwine with the fabric of public health consciousness, beckoning to uncover unforeseen connections.

Beyond traditional academic sources and literary works, our exhaustive literature review has encompassed unconventional sources, including but not limited to grocery lists, fortune cookie fortunes, and even discarded CVS receipts. While these explorations at first glance may appear ludicrous, they have yielded unexpected morsels of insight, adding a whimsical layer to our scholarly quest for understanding the perplexing relationship between Nebraska's language educators and the public's fascination with N95 masks.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Nebraska and Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2005 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Nexus of Nebraska's University Language Lecturers and N95 Mask Mysteries

[[ABSTRACT]]
The enigmatic relationship between the abundance of university foreign language and literature instructors in the state of Nebraska and the public's interest in N95 masks sparks an intriguing inquiry. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the count of language educators and Google Trends to measure search interest in N95 masks, our study unveils a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.6324163 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning from 2005 to 2022. This connection, while not immediately intuitive, suggests a complex interplay between language pedagogy and public health concerns, distinctly fascinating yet confoundingly perplexing. Our findings open a Pandora's box of possibilities, shedding light on the language-laden linkage to respiratory protection, leaving much to contemplate and unravel.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of academia and public curiosity often yields unexpected and intriguing connections, and the peculiar correlation between the number of university foreign language and literature instructors in Nebraska and the public's interest in N95 masks stands as a testament to this adage. While it may seem implausible that the teaching of French, Spanish, German, and other languages could have any bearing on the public's interest in respiratory protection, our study delves into this enigmatic relationship to unmask the underlying dynamics.
As researchers, we often find ourselves in a linguistic labyrinth, navigating through the mazes of data and insights to uncover hidden patterns and correlations. The Bureau of Labor Statistics grants us passage into the realm of academia, providing a trove of data on the count of language educators in the state of Nebraska, while Google Trends offers a window into the ever-fluctuating realm of public interest, particularly in the elusive realm of N95 masks. Our study melds these disparate datasets, forging a bridge between the esoteric world of language pedagogy and the palpable realm of public health concerns.
The allure of the inexplicable beckons us, spurring our inquiry into the dimensions of this unusual nexus. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.6324163, accompanied by a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over a seventeen-year period, invokes a sense of fascination and bewilderment. It is akin to stumbling upon an unexpected treasure trove hidden in plain sight, prompting us to unravel the threads of this peculiar tapestry.
One might be inclined to dismiss this correlation as mere happenstance, a statistical quirk dancing on the fringes of significance. However, our findings urge us to resist such hasty judgments. The interplay between language educators and public interest in respiratory protection emerges as a compelling subject for exploration, inviting us to dig deeper and unravel the peculiarities that underpin this unexpected connection.
In the following sections, we embark on an in-depth analysis of this uncharted territory, untangling the intricate web of factors that give rise to this connection. Our foray into this uncharted territory promises to shed light on the cryptic linkage between language education and public health, challenging conventional wisdom and beckoning us to reimagine the underlying dynamics. Join us on this academic odyssey as we navigate the labyrinthine corridors of academia and public interest, venturing into the intersecting realms of language pedagogy and public health concern.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:

Our research methodology involved a multi-pronged approach to gather the relevant data for discerning the intricate relationship between the number of university foreign language and literature instructors in Nebraska and Google searches for 'N95 mask'. The initial phase of data collection included an exhaustive mining of information from reputable sources such as the Bureau of Labor Statistics, with a fervent enthusiasm akin to a prospector seeking nuggets of insight. The count of language educators in Nebraska was meticulously tabulated over the period from 2005 to 2022, offering a comprehensive view of the ebb and flow of linguistic pedagogy in the state.

Furthermore, we delved into the digital domain, harnessing the omnipresent tool of Google Trends to gauge the fluctuating levels of public curiosity regarding N95 masks. Our digital expedition unraveled the search interest data and trends, akin to voyaging into uncharted waters to uncover hidden treasures of information. This data, spanning the same time frame as the Bureau of Labor Statistics data, provided us with a lens into the public's evolving preoccupations with respiratory protection, unveiling the peaks and troughs of interest with a sense of intrigue akin to studying the tides of the ocean.

Data Analysis:

The next phase of our methodology involved a meticulous examination of the collected data, with a keen eye for patterns and anomalies akin to a seasoned detective scanning a crime scene for clues. We employed statistical techniques to compute the correlation coefficient between the count of university language instructors and the Google search interest for 'N95 mask', utilizing the tools of analysis to discern the underlying connections amidst the sea of data.

The statistical analysis was underpinned by a rigorous application of regression models, designed to elucidate the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Through the art of statistical modeling, we endeavored to unravel the enigmatic linkages and unearth the hidden threads that weave these two seemingly unrelated domains into a cohesive narrative.

Cross-Validation and Sensitivity Analysis:

To ensure the robustness of our findings, we subjected our analysis to a battery of cross-validation techniques, akin to stress-testing a bridge to ascertain its structural integrity. Sensitivity analyses were also performed, akin to tinkering with the dials of a finely tuned instrument, to gauge the resilience of our results to potential outliers and variations in the data.

Ethical Considerations:

In conducting our research, we remained steadfast in upholding the ethical principles governing academic inquiry, akin to navigating the moral compass that guides the scholarly enterprise. The data utilized in our study were acquired from publicly available sources, and rigorous protocols were adhered to in preserving the confidentiality and integrity of the information.

In a manner akin to a surgeon's precision, we ensured the anonymity of individual data points to safeguard the privacy of the subjects represented within our dataset, affirming our commitment to ethical research practices.

Limitations:

Amidst the rigors of scientific inquiry, it is imperative to acknowledge the limitations inherent in our methodology. The boundary conditions of our study encompass the constraints of available data and the inherent assumptions underpinning statistical analyses. While our findings unveil a compelling nexus between language pedagogy and public health concerns, caution must be exercised in extrapolating causative relationships solely based on the observed correlations.

Conclusion:

Despite these limitations, our methodology served as a robust framework for unraveling the enigmatic affiliation between the count of university language educators in Nebraska and public interest in N95 masks. Our study ventured into uncharted terrain and unearthed a tenuous yet intriguing connection, challenging conventional paradigms and offering a portal to reimagine the intersections of language education and public health concern.

In the subsequent sections of our paper, we present the empirical results of our investigation, delving into the nuances of this peculiar correlation and offering insights into the labyrinthine entanglement of language pedagogy and public curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Nebraska and Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2005 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6324163, r-squared of 0.3999504, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Nexus of Nebraska's University Language Lecturers and N95 Mask Mysteries

[[ABSTRACT]]
The enigmatic relationship between the abundance of university foreign language and literature instructors in the state of Nebraska and the public's interest in N95 masks sparks an intriguing inquiry. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the count of language educators and Google Trends to measure search interest in N95 masks, our study unveils a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.6324163 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning from 2005 to 2022. This connection, while not immediately intuitive, suggests a complex interplay between language pedagogy and public health concerns, distinctly fascinating yet confoundingly perplexing. Our findings open a Pandora's box of possibilities, shedding light on the language-laden linkage to respiratory protection, leaving much to contemplate and unravel.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of academia and public curiosity often yields unexpected and intriguing connections, and the peculiar correlation between the number of university foreign language and literature instructors in Nebraska and the public's interest in N95 masks stands as a testament to this adage. While it may seem implausible that the teaching of French, Spanish, German, and other languages could have any bearing on the public's interest in respiratory protection, our study delves into this enigmatic relationship to unmask the underlying dynamics.
As researchers, we often find ourselves in a linguistic labyrinth, navigating through the mazes of data and insights to uncover hidden patterns and correlations. The Bureau of Labor Statistics grants us passage into the realm of academia, providing a trove of data on the count of language educators in the state of Nebraska, while Google Trends offers a window into the ever-fluctuating realm of public interest, particularly in the elusive realm of N95 masks. Our study melds these disparate datasets, forging a bridge between the esoteric world of language pedagogy and the palpable realm of public health concerns.
The allure of the inexplicable beckons us, spurring our inquiry into the dimensions of this unusual nexus. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.6324163, accompanied by a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over a seventeen-year period, invokes a sense of fascination and bewilderment. It is akin to stumbling upon an unexpected treasure trove hidden in plain sight, prompting us to unravel the threads of this peculiar tapestry.
One might be inclined to dismiss this correlation as mere happenstance, a statistical quirk dancing on the fringes of significance. However, our findings urge us to resist such hasty judgments. The interplay between language educators and public interest in respiratory protection emerges as a compelling subject for exploration, inviting us to dig deeper and unravel the peculiarities that underpin this unexpected connection.
In the following sections, we embark on an in-depth analysis of this uncharted territory, untangling the intricate web of factors that give rise to this connection. Our foray into this uncharted territory promises to shed light on the cryptic linkage between language education and public health, challenging conventional wisdom and beckoning us to reimagine the underlying dynamics. Join us on this academic odyssey as we navigate the labyrinthine corridors of academia and public interest, venturing into the intersecting realms of language pedagogy and public health concern.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between the number of university foreign language and literature instructors in Nebraska and public interest in N95 masks yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.6324163, an r-squared of 0.3999504, and a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period of 2005 to 2022. These statistical metrics affirm a moderately-strong positive relationship between the two variables. It seems that when it comes to undertaking linguistic endeavors, Nebraskans also have a keen interest in safeguarding their respiratory well-being. Our findings illuminate a curiously synergistic connection between the world of language pedagogy and the public's concern for respiratory protection.

[Fig. 1 about here]

As evidenced in Fig. 1, the scatterplot boldly showcases the noteworthy correlation between the count of university foreign language and literature educators in Nebraska and the search interest in N95 masks. The data points form a discernible pattern, painting a vivid picture of the interwoven nature of these seemingly disparate factors. It is as if the students of language and literature are not only honing their linguistic prowess but also kindling an interest in respiratory defense, or perhaps meticulously planning multilingual escapades for the day when the world is free of respiratory apprehensions.

This unexpected correlation prompts a reevaluation of the linear connections in an ever-evolving world. It is a reminder that statistical analyses and academic discoveries are not just confined to predictable realms; they are also lurking in the uncharted territories of intellectual exploration. Our findings evoke a sense of the inexplicable, thus fortifying the need for continued inquiry into the esoteric ties between language education and public health concerns. The intersection of these unlikely bedfellows urges us to embrace the whimsical quirkiness of human interests and the intricate interplay between intellectual pursuits and mundane necessities. This academic odyssey has unraveled a conundrum that is both confoundingly confounding and intriguingly intriguing.

In the subsequent sections, we delve deeper into the underlying mechanisms and potential implications of this unearthed correlation. Our endeavor aims to not only illuminate the woven strands of this enigmatic connection but also to spark further curiosity and discourse regarding the captivating interface of pedagogy and public health.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Nebraska and Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Nexus of Nebraska's University Language Lecturers and N95 Mask Mysteries

[[ABSTRACT]]
The enigmatic relationship between the abundance of university foreign language and literature instructors in the state of Nebraska and the public's interest in N95 masks sparks an intriguing inquiry. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the count of language educators and Google Trends to measure search interest in N95 masks, our study unveils a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.6324163 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning from 2005 to 2022. This connection, while not immediately intuitive, suggests a complex interplay between language pedagogy and public health concerns, distinctly fascinating yet confoundingly perplexing. Our findings open a Pandora's box of possibilities, shedding light on the language-laden linkage to respiratory protection, leaving much to contemplate and unravel.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The interconnectedness of university foreign language and literature instructors in Nebraska and the public's interest in N95 masks has sparked an array of research inquiries, prompting scholarly investigations into this unexpected correlation. Smith et al. (2018) delved into the enigmatic world of language education and its latent implications, underscoring the complex web of factors that shape public preferences for respiratory protection. Doe's (2016) comprehensive analysis of linguistic influences on public health behaviors offers a nuanced perspective, shedding light on the subtleties that underpin this peculiar connection. Jones and colleagues (2020) conducted a thorough exploration of language pedagogy and its reverberations in public consciousness, demonstrating the intricate interplay between linguistic exposure and respiratory precautions.
Moving beyond the realm of scholarly articles, influential non-fiction works such as "The Language Instinct" by Steven Pinker and "The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks" by Rebecca Skloot offer tangential insights into the interplay between language, culture, and health. These seminal works serve as a bridge, offering indirect commentary on the convoluted relationship between language education and public health consciousness.
In exploring the fiction domain, the works of Gabriel Garcia Marquez, such as "One Hundred Years of Solitude," and Jhumpa Lahiri's "Interpreter of Maladies," present immersive narratives that delve into the rich tapestry of language and culture, albeit in realms distant from the tangible concerns of respiratory protection. Yet, amidst the hallowed halls of literature, threads of linguistic intrigue entwine with the fabric of public health consciousness, beckoning to uncover unforeseen connections.
Beyond traditional academic sources and literary works, our exhaustive literature review has encompassed unconventional sources, including but not limited to grocery lists, fortune cookie fortunes, and even discarded CVS receipts. While these explorations at first glance may appear ludicrous, they have yielded unexpected morsels of insight, adding a whimsical layer to our scholarly quest for understanding the perplexing relationship between Nebraska's language educators and the public's fascination with N95 masks.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of university foreign language and literature instructors in Nebraska and public interest in N95 masks yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.6324163, an r-squared of 0.3999504, and a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period of 2005 to 2022. These statistical metrics affirm a moderately-strong positive relationship between the two variables. It seems that when it comes to undertaking linguistic endeavors, Nebraskans also have a keen interest in safeguarding their respiratory well-being. Our findings illuminate a curiously synergistic connection between the world of language pedagogy and the public's concern for respiratory protection.
[Fig. 1 about here]
As evidenced in Fig. 1, the scatterplot boldly showcases the noteworthy correlation between the count of university foreign language and literature educators in Nebraska and the search interest in N95 masks. The data points form a discernible pattern, painting a vivid picture of the interwoven nature of these seemingly disparate factors. It is as if the students of language and literature are not only honing their linguistic prowess but also kindling an interest in respiratory defense, or perhaps meticulously planning multilingual escapades for the day when the world is free of respiratory apprehensions.
This unexpected correlation prompts a reevaluation of the linear connections in an ever-evolving world. It is a reminder that statistical analyses and academic discoveries are not just confined to predictable realms; they are also lurking in the uncharted territories of intellectual exploration. Our findings evoke a sense of the inexplicable, thus fortifying the need for continued inquiry into the esoteric ties between language education and public health concerns. The intersection of these unlikely bedfellows urges us to embrace the whimsical quirkiness of human interests and the intricate interplay between intellectual pursuits and mundane necessities. This academic odyssey has unraveled a conundrum that is both confoundingly confounding and intriguingly intriguing.
In the subsequent sections, we delve deeper into the underlying mechanisms and potential implications of this unearthed correlation. Our endeavor aims to not only illuminate the woven strands of this enigmatic connection but also to spark further curiosity and discourse regarding the captivating interface of pedagogy and public health.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The curious confluence of Nebraska's linguistic savants and the populace's fascination with N95 masks offers a plethora of intrigue, and our findings cast an illuminating spotlight on this enigmatic relationship. The moderate to strong positive correlation observed in our analysis mirrors the sentiments echoed by previous research by Smith et al. (2018) and Doe (2016), whose work sparked our appreciation for the depth of linguistic influences on public health concerns. It seems that the linguistic prowess honed in the hallowed halls of Nebraska's academic institutions is not merely conducive to eloquent discourse but also acts as a catalyst for a heightened awareness of respiratory well-being. Just as Gabriel Garcia Marquez weaves captivating tales of magical realism, the denizens of the Cornhusker State may be engaging in a linguistic dance that intersects with the prosaic yet indispensable realm of respiratory protection.

Our study corroborates the known unknowns alluded to in influential works like "The Language Instinct" by Steven Pinker and "The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks" by Rebecca Skloot, where linguistic nuance intersects with health consciousness in ways that lay beyond the realm of immediate perception. The language-laden lineage of this correlation is indeed confoundingly confounding yet intriguingly intriguing, evoking a sense of the inexplicable and the need for continued inquiry into the seen yet unseen connections between linguistics and public health.

Peering into the elegant scatterplot, we discern a pattern that suggests the count of university foreign language and literature educators in Nebraska holds hands with the public's interest in N95 masks, whimsically waltzing in harmonious synchrony. It appears the scholarly minds are not just kindling an intense passion for language and literature but also fostering a vigilant eye towards respiratory precautions, akin to the metaphorical adolescents venturing forth into linguistic escapades. This unexpected correlation serves as a reminder that scholarly pursuits are not merely confined to the predictable, but also resonate in the uncharted territories of research, sparking curiosity and discourse amidst the quirky depths of human interests.

Our academic odyssey has unraveled a conundrum that is as enchantingly perplexing as it is compelling, nudging us to humbly contemplate the unique fusion of intellectual pursuits and mundane necessities. The intersection of language education and public health concerns urges us to embrace the whimsical quirks of human interests and to marvel at the serendipitous interplay between the realms of pedagogy and public health.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Nebraska and Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Nexus of Nebraska's University Language Lecturers and N95 Mask Mysteries

[[ABSTRACT]]
The enigmatic relationship between the abundance of university foreign language and literature instructors in the state of Nebraska and the public's interest in N95 masks sparks an intriguing inquiry. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the count of language educators and Google Trends to measure search interest in N95 masks, our study unveils a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.6324163 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning from 2005 to 2022. This connection, while not immediately intuitive, suggests a complex interplay between language pedagogy and public health concerns, distinctly fascinating yet confoundingly perplexing. Our findings open a Pandora's box of possibilities, shedding light on the language-laden linkage to respiratory protection, leaving much to contemplate and unravel.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of academia and public curiosity often yields unexpected and intriguing connections, and the peculiar correlation between the number of university foreign language and literature instructors in Nebraska and the public's interest in N95 masks stands as a testament to this adage. While it may seem implausible that the teaching of French, Spanish, German, and other languages could have any bearing on the public's interest in respiratory protection, our study delves into this enigmatic relationship to unmask the underlying dynamics.
As researchers, we often find ourselves in a linguistic labyrinth, navigating through the mazes of data and insights to uncover hidden patterns and correlations. The Bureau of Labor Statistics grants us passage into the realm of academia, providing a trove of data on the count of language educators in the state of Nebraska, while Google Trends offers a window into the ever-fluctuating realm of public interest, particularly in the elusive realm of N95 masks. Our study melds these disparate datasets, forging a bridge between the esoteric world of language pedagogy and the palpable realm of public health concerns.
The allure of the inexplicable beckons us, spurring our inquiry into the dimensions of this unusual nexus. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.6324163, accompanied by a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over a seventeen-year period, invokes a sense of fascination and bewilderment. It is akin to stumbling upon an unexpected treasure trove hidden in plain sight, prompting us to unravel the threads of this peculiar tapestry.
One might be inclined to dismiss this correlation as mere happenstance, a statistical quirk dancing on the fringes of significance. However, our findings urge us to resist such hasty judgments. The interplay between language educators and public interest in respiratory protection emerges as a compelling subject for exploration, inviting us to dig deeper and unravel the peculiarities that underpin this unexpected connection.
In the following sections, we embark on an in-depth analysis of this uncharted territory, untangling the intricate web of factors that give rise to this connection. Our foray into this uncharted territory promises to shed light on the cryptic linkage between language education and public health, challenging conventional wisdom and beckoning us to reimagine the underlying dynamics. Join us on this academic odyssey as we navigate the labyrinthine corridors of academia and public interest, venturing into the intersecting realms of language pedagogy and public health concern.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of university foreign language and literature instructors in Nebraska and public interest in N95 masks yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.6324163, an r-squared of 0.3999504, and a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period of 2005 to 2022. These statistical metrics affirm a moderately-strong positive relationship between the two variables. It seems that when it comes to undertaking linguistic endeavors, Nebraskans also have a keen interest in safeguarding their respiratory well-being. Our findings illuminate a curiously synergistic connection between the world of language pedagogy and the public's concern for respiratory protection.
[Fig. 1 about here]
As evidenced in Fig. 1, the scatterplot boldly showcases the noteworthy correlation between the count of university foreign language and literature educators in Nebraska and the search interest in N95 masks. The data points form a discernible pattern, painting a vivid picture of the interwoven nature of these seemingly disparate factors. It is as if the students of language and literature are not only honing their linguistic prowess but also kindling an interest in respiratory defense, or perhaps meticulously planning multilingual escapades for the day when the world is free of respiratory apprehensions.
This unexpected correlation prompts a reevaluation of the linear connections in an ever-evolving world. It is a reminder that statistical analyses and academic discoveries are not just confined to predictable realms; they are also lurking in the uncharted territories of intellectual exploration. Our findings evoke a sense of the inexplicable, thus fortifying the need for continued inquiry into the esoteric ties between language education and public health concerns. The intersection of these unlikely bedfellows urges us to embrace the whimsical quirkiness of human interests and the intricate interplay between intellectual pursuits and mundane necessities. This academic odyssey has unraveled a conundrum that is both confoundingly confounding and intriguingly intriguing.
In the subsequent sections, we delve deeper into the underlying mechanisms and potential implications of this unearthed correlation. Our endeavor aims to not only illuminate the woven strands of this enigmatic connection but also to spark further curiosity and discourse regarding the captivating interface of pedagogy and public health.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unveiled a surprisingly robust correlation between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Nebraska and the public's interest in N95 masks. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over a seventeen-year period entices us to contemplate the intricate interplay between language education and respiratory protection. This unexpected nexus illuminates the curious synergy between intellectual pursuits and the practical concern for respiratory well-being. The scatterplot vividly portrays the intertwined nature of these seemingly unrelated variables, prompting us to envision a world where linguistic dexterity and respiratory defense seamlessly converge.

While it may be tempting to dismiss this connection as a mere statistical anomaly, our findings beckon us to embrace the unconventional and recognize the uncharted territories of intellectual exploration. As we reflect on the inexplicable nature of this correlation, one cannot help but ponder the whimsical quirkiness of human interests and the intricate interplay between academic endeavors and mundane necessities. This unexpected linkage not only challenges conventional wisdom but also invites us to delve deeper into the underlying mechanisms and potential implications of this unearthed correlation.

As we stand at the crossroads of language pedagogy and public health concern, our research underscores the need for continued inquiry into the esoteric ties between intellectual pursuits and everyday exigencies. The confoundingly confounding and intriguingly intriguing nature of this conundrum stirs a desire for further exploration, yet we are compelled to assert that no more research in this area is needed.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Nexus of Nebraska's University Language Lecturers and N95 Mask Mysteries. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Linguistic Puzzles and Protective Gear


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Nexus of Nebraska's University Language Lecturers and N95 Mask Mysteries. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Linguistic Bioprotection Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Nexus of Nebraska's University Language Lecturers and N95 Mask Mysteries with an abstract of The enigmatic relationship between the abundance of university foreign language and literature instructors in the state of Nebraska and the public's interest in N95 masks sparks an intriguing inquiry. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the count of language educators and Google Trends to measure search interest in N95 masks, our study unveils a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.6324163 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning from 2005 to 2022. This connection, while not immediately intuitive, suggests a complex interplay between language pedagogy and public health concerns, distinctly fascinating yet confoundingly perplexing. Our findings open a Pandora's box of possibilities, shedding light on the language-laden linkage to respiratory protection, leaving much to contemplate and unravel.

ChatGPT:

University foreign language instructors, Nebraska educators, N95 mask public interest, language educators data, Google Trends N95 search, correlation between language educators and N95 interest, language pedagogy and public health, language influence on respiratory protection, Nebraska language instructors relationship with N95 masks.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Nebraska
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of foreign language and literature teachers, postsecondary in Nebraska
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Nebraska

Google searches for 'n95 mask'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'n95 mask' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'n95 mask'

Correlation r = 0.6324163 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.3999504 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 40% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'n95 mask') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Nebraska) over the 18 years from 2005 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0049. 0.0048583337290135160000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.63 in 0.49% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 206 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.23, 0.85 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Nebraska (Laborers)7070100120120100100100907070404040150190110120
Google searches for 'n95 mask' (Rel. search volume)0.6666671001.66667000511111.666671.1428634.758.583336.33333




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([70,70,100,120,120,100,100,100,90,70,70,40,40,40,150,190,110,120,])
array_2 = np.array([0.666667,1,0,0,1.66667,0,0,0,5,1,1,1,1,1.66667,1.14286,34.75,8.58333,6.33333,])
array_1_name = "The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Nebraska"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'n95 mask'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 1801 · Black Variable ID: 10906 · Red Variable ID: 1496
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0