about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,679 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Krysta and the second variable is Points Scored by Winning Team in Super Bowl.  The chart goes from 1975 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the popularity of the name Krysta rose, so did the points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. It seems that there was some sort of mystical connection between the two. Perhaps every time someone shouted "Krysta" in excitement, it inadvertently added a little extra 'kick' to the game. It's as if the name itself was a secret quarterback whispering sweet victory strategies into the team's ears. Who knew that all this time, the real MVP of the Super Bowl was just a name away from superstardom! Or maybe there's just something about that name that screams "touchdown!"

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of the grand Super Bowl stadium packed with ecstatic fans cheering in the stands, while a colossal banner unfurls in the center with "Congratulations Krysta!" emblazoned across it. The crowd is awash with jubilation as vibrant confetti cascades from the sky, commemorating the victorious team's groundbreaking 50-point achievement. The joyous atmosphere of the event should be unmistakable, with the energy and enthusiasm of the crowd palpable. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Krysta and Points Scored by Winning Team in Super Bowl. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Low poly Cute cartoon Sci-fi fantacy Realistic Concept art
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Krysta and Points Scored by Winning Team in Super Bowl together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A large banner at the Super Bowl stadium reads "Congratulations Krysta!" as fans cheer in the stands. The banner is surrounded by colorful confetti falling from the sky, celebrating the winning team scoring a record-breaking 50 points.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: A large banner at the Super Bowl stadium reads "Congratulations Krysta!" as fans cheer in the stands. The banner is surrounded by colorful confetti falling from the sky, celebrating the winning team scoring a record-breaking 50 points. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of the grand Super Bowl stadium packed with ecstatic fans cheering in the stands, while a colossal banner unfurls in the center with "Congratulations Krysta!" emblazoned across it. The crowd is awash with jubilation as vibrant confetti cascades from the sky, commemorating the victorious team's groundbreaking 50-point achievement. The joyous atmosphere of the event should be unmistakable, with the energy and enthusiasm of the crowd palpable.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the first name Krysta positively influenced Points Scored by Winning Team in Super Bowl. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Krysta's Knack: The Correlation between Krysta's Popularity and Points Scored in the Super Bowl

The Journal of Quirky Quantitative Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Krysta and Points Scored by Winning Team in Super Bowl. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.5242463 and p < 0.01 for 1975 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Krysta's Knack: The Correlation between Krysta's Popularity and Points Scored in the Super Bowl

[[ABSTRACT]]
The aim of this research was to investigate the potential link between the popularity of the first name Krysta and the points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, a quantitative analysis was conducted to address this pressing question. The results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5242463 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2022. This implies that there is indeed an intriguing association between the prevalence of the name Krysta and the success of Super Bowl teams.

Interestingly, our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Krysta increases, so does the number of points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. The implications of this peculiar correlation are both thought-provoking and memorable, much like a good dad joke. Could it be that there is a "Krysta"l clear winning trend associated with this name? One can't help but wonder if the success of the Super Bowl teams somehow hinges on the popularity of individuals bearing the name Krysta. Further research is warranted to unravel the complexities of this unexpected association and to discern whether other names hold similar sway over sporting events.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Krysta and Points Scored by Winning Team in Super Bowl. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Krysta's Knack: The Correlation between Krysta's Popularity and Points Scored in the Super Bowl

[[ABSTRACT]]
The aim of this research was to investigate the potential link between the popularity of the first name Krysta and the points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, a quantitative analysis was conducted to address this pressing question. The results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5242463 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2022. This implies that there is indeed an intriguing association between the prevalence of the name Krysta and the success of Super Bowl teams.

Interestingly, our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Krysta increases, so does the number of points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. The implications of this peculiar correlation are both thought-provoking and memorable, much like a good dad joke. Could it be that there is a "Krysta"l clear winning trend associated with this name? One can't help but wonder if the success of the Super Bowl teams somehow hinges on the popularity of individuals bearing the name Krysta. Further research is warranted to unravel the complexities of this unexpected association and to discern whether other names hold similar sway over sporting events.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of sports and nomenclature presents an intriguing field of study, akin to a pun about data analysis - it requires a keen eye and a good sense of humor. The influence of seemingly unrelated factors on the outcome of athletic events has long fascinated researchers and armchair statisticians alike. In this vein, we endeavored to explore the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Krysta and the points scored by the victorious team in the grand spectacle of American football that is the Super Bowl.

One might say that our pursuit of this correlation was as relentless as a parent's quest for the perfect dad joke - thorough, unwavering, and at times, amusingly unexpected. As we delved into the realms of historical naming trends and sports statistics, we could not help but ponder the potential significance of a seemingly arbitrary variable such as a person's given name on the prowess of elite athletes.

The aim of this research was to blend the rigors of statistical analysis with the levity of a well-timed quip; to discern whether the popularity of the name Krysta harbors any discernible influence over the outcome of one of the most-watched sporting events in the world. Our findings promise to be as illuminating as a light bulb in a STEM laboratory, shedding light on a hitherto overlooked facet of sports dynamics.

Embarking on this scholarly escapade, we aimed to uncover if there exists a statistically meaningful relationship between the frequency of the name Krysta and the number of points accrued by the triumphant team in the Super Bowl. Would the data reveal a correlation as conspicuous as a neon sign, or would it prove as elusive as a playful quip in the midst of a serious conversation? The results of our investigation beckon curiosity, much like the setup of a wry but undeniable dad joke.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Krysta and Points Scored by Winning Team in Super Bowl. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Krysta's Knack: The Correlation between Krysta's Popularity and Points Scored in the Super Bowl

[[ABSTRACT]]
The aim of this research was to investigate the potential link between the popularity of the first name Krysta and the points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, a quantitative analysis was conducted to address this pressing question. The results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5242463 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2022. This implies that there is indeed an intriguing association between the prevalence of the name Krysta and the success of Super Bowl teams.

Interestingly, our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Krysta increases, so does the number of points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. The implications of this peculiar correlation are both thought-provoking and memorable, much like a good dad joke. Could it be that there is a "Krysta"l clear winning trend associated with this name? One can't help but wonder if the success of the Super Bowl teams somehow hinges on the popularity of individuals bearing the name Krysta. Further research is warranted to unravel the complexities of this unexpected association and to discern whether other names hold similar sway over sporting events.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of sports and nomenclature presents an intriguing field of study, akin to a pun about data analysis - it requires a keen eye and a good sense of humor. The influence of seemingly unrelated factors on the outcome of athletic events has long fascinated researchers and armchair statisticians alike. In this vein, we endeavored to explore the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Krysta and the points scored by the victorious team in the grand spectacle of American football that is the Super Bowl.
One might say that our pursuit of this correlation was as relentless as a parent's quest for the perfect dad joke - thorough, unwavering, and at times, amusingly unexpected. As we delved into the realms of historical naming trends and sports statistics, we could not help but ponder the potential significance of a seemingly arbitrary variable such as a person's given name on the prowess of elite athletes.
The aim of this research was to blend the rigors of statistical analysis with the levity of a well-timed quip; to discern whether the popularity of the name Krysta harbors any discernible influence over the outcome of one of the most-watched sporting events in the world. Our findings promise to be as illuminating as a light bulb in a STEM laboratory, shedding light on a hitherto overlooked facet of sports dynamics.
Embarking on this scholarly escapade, we aimed to uncover if there exists a statistically meaningful relationship between the frequency of the name Krysta and the number of points accrued by the triumphant team in the Super Bowl. Would the data reveal a correlation as conspicuous as a neon sign, or would it prove as elusive as a playful quip in the midst of a serious conversation? The results of our investigation beckon curiosity, much like the setup of a wry but undeniable dad joke.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The subject of naming patterns and their influence on various societal phenomena has captivated researchers for decades. Smith et al. (2010) examined the correlations between first names and sports outcomes, shedding light on the potential influence of nomenclature on athletic success. Doe and Jones (2015) extended this line of inquiry by investigating the impact of popular given names on the performance of professional sports teams. These sobering investigations provided a foundation for delving into the vexing question of whether the name Krysta holds any sway over the points scored in the esteemed event of the Super Bowl.

In "Trends in American Naming" by Lee (2003), the author delves into the complex landscape of first name popularity and its implications for societal trends. Lee's comprehensive analysis provides insight into the ebb and flow of naming patterns and their potential repercussions on various domains, including sports. In "The Power of Names" by Schwarz (2017), the author explores the psychological and social significance of names, offering a compelling perspective on the potential influence of names on individual and collective achievements.

Moreover, fictional works such as "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "The Name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco offer tantalizing narratives surrounding the weight of names and their impact on events - albeit in a more fantastical context. These literary forays into the realm of names and their connotations serve as a reminder of the enduring allure of the subject matter and prompt further contemplation regarding its potential real-world implications.

Intriguingly, television series such as "Alias" and "The Americans" provide fictional yet captivating explorations of the significance of nomenclature and its role in shaping identities and outcomes. These popular series offer a glimpse into the multifaceted connections between names, personas, and the unfolding of events, inspiring contemplation on the potential parallels with the influence of the name Krysta on Super Bowl performances.

To aptly summarize the literature on the subject, one might say that the role of names in shaping destinies and outcomes is as engaging as a clever pun at a scholarly conference - always unexpected, often whimsical, and at times, surprisingly revelatory.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Krysta and Points Scored by Winning Team in Super Bowl. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia . You used data from 1975 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Krysta's Knack: The Correlation between Krysta's Popularity and Points Scored in the Super Bowl

[[ABSTRACT]]
The aim of this research was to investigate the potential link between the popularity of the first name Krysta and the points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, a quantitative analysis was conducted to address this pressing question. The results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5242463 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2022. This implies that there is indeed an intriguing association between the prevalence of the name Krysta and the success of Super Bowl teams.

Interestingly, our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Krysta increases, so does the number of points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. The implications of this peculiar correlation are both thought-provoking and memorable, much like a good dad joke. Could it be that there is a "Krysta"l clear winning trend associated with this name? One can't help but wonder if the success of the Super Bowl teams somehow hinges on the popularity of individuals bearing the name Krysta. Further research is warranted to unravel the complexities of this unexpected association and to discern whether other names hold similar sway over sporting events.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of sports and nomenclature presents an intriguing field of study, akin to a pun about data analysis - it requires a keen eye and a good sense of humor. The influence of seemingly unrelated factors on the outcome of athletic events has long fascinated researchers and armchair statisticians alike. In this vein, we endeavored to explore the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Krysta and the points scored by the victorious team in the grand spectacle of American football that is the Super Bowl.
One might say that our pursuit of this correlation was as relentless as a parent's quest for the perfect dad joke - thorough, unwavering, and at times, amusingly unexpected. As we delved into the realms of historical naming trends and sports statistics, we could not help but ponder the potential significance of a seemingly arbitrary variable such as a person's given name on the prowess of elite athletes.
The aim of this research was to blend the rigors of statistical analysis with the levity of a well-timed quip; to discern whether the popularity of the name Krysta harbors any discernible influence over the outcome of one of the most-watched sporting events in the world. Our findings promise to be as illuminating as a light bulb in a STEM laboratory, shedding light on a hitherto overlooked facet of sports dynamics.
Embarking on this scholarly escapade, we aimed to uncover if there exists a statistically meaningful relationship between the frequency of the name Krysta and the number of points accrued by the triumphant team in the Super Bowl. Would the data reveal a correlation as conspicuous as a neon sign, or would it prove as elusive as a playful quip in the midst of a serious conversation? The results of our investigation beckon curiosity, much like the setup of a wry but undeniable dad joke.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To undertake this investigation, a meticulous and at times whimsical approach was adopted, reminiscent of a playful lab technician. The data pertaining to the first name "Krysta" was sourced from the US Social Security Administration's database of baby names, while statistics regarding the points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl were gleaned from the venerable online resource, Wikipedia. The period under consideration spans from 1975 to 2022, encapsulating a wide-ranging swath of naming practices and gridiron triumphs.

To determine the frequency of the name "Krysta," a combination of statistical measures akin to a researcher's version of "connect-the-dots" were employed, including the number of babies registered with this name each year, expressed as a percentage of total births. These figures were then cross-validated with the reported Super Bowl outcomes for the corresponding years, with the winning team's points scored serving as our primary indicator of success.

The statistical analyses included a regression model that was as stable as a pun delivered by a seasoned jokester, encompassing both simple linear regression to examine the relationship between the name popularity and points scored, and multiple linear regression to control for potential confounding variables such as team performance, game strategies, and meteorological conditions.

Classical statistical tests, including a t-test and ANOVA, were conducted to evaluate the significance of the correlation between the name "Krysta" and Super Bowl points scored. Additional robustness checks were performed to validate the findings, incorporating bootstrap methods and Monte Carlo simulations to account for potential sampling and variability issues.

Furthermore, to infuse the analysis with a dash of mirth, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the impact of variations in the spelling of the name "Krysta" and potential proxy names such as "Krista" or "Crystal" on the observed correlation.

Lastly, the research team employed a lighthearted yet judicious approach to outliers by adopting a "three-dad-joke rule" for the removal of extreme data points, ensuring that the results remain robust in the face of unexpected deviations.

In summary, the research methodology amalgamated a rigorous application of statistical techniques with a touch of wit, akin to a daring feat of scientific acrobatics. This approach allowed for the exploration of the potential link between the ebb and flow of name popularity and the crescendo of points in the celebrated arena of the Super Bowl, unlocking an unexpected synergy between nomenclature and athletic achievement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Krysta and Points Scored by Winning Team in Super Bowl. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1975 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.5242463, r-squared of 0.2748342, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Krysta's Knack: The Correlation between Krysta's Popularity and Points Scored in the Super Bowl

[[ABSTRACT]]
The aim of this research was to investigate the potential link between the popularity of the first name Krysta and the points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, a quantitative analysis was conducted to address this pressing question. The results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5242463 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2022. This implies that there is indeed an intriguing association between the prevalence of the name Krysta and the success of Super Bowl teams.

Interestingly, our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Krysta increases, so does the number of points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. The implications of this peculiar correlation are both thought-provoking and memorable, much like a good dad joke. Could it be that there is a "Krysta"l clear winning trend associated with this name? One can't help but wonder if the success of the Super Bowl teams somehow hinges on the popularity of individuals bearing the name Krysta. Further research is warranted to unravel the complexities of this unexpected association and to discern whether other names hold similar sway over sporting events.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of sports and nomenclature presents an intriguing field of study, akin to a pun about data analysis - it requires a keen eye and a good sense of humor. The influence of seemingly unrelated factors on the outcome of athletic events has long fascinated researchers and armchair statisticians alike. In this vein, we endeavored to explore the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Krysta and the points scored by the victorious team in the grand spectacle of American football that is the Super Bowl.
One might say that our pursuit of this correlation was as relentless as a parent's quest for the perfect dad joke - thorough, unwavering, and at times, amusingly unexpected. As we delved into the realms of historical naming trends and sports statistics, we could not help but ponder the potential significance of a seemingly arbitrary variable such as a person's given name on the prowess of elite athletes.
The aim of this research was to blend the rigors of statistical analysis with the levity of a well-timed quip; to discern whether the popularity of the name Krysta harbors any discernible influence over the outcome of one of the most-watched sporting events in the world. Our findings promise to be as illuminating as a light bulb in a STEM laboratory, shedding light on a hitherto overlooked facet of sports dynamics.
Embarking on this scholarly escapade, we aimed to uncover if there exists a statistically meaningful relationship between the frequency of the name Krysta and the number of points accrued by the triumphant team in the Super Bowl. Would the data reveal a correlation as conspicuous as a neon sign, or would it prove as elusive as a playful quip in the midst of a serious conversation? The results of our investigation beckon curiosity, much like the setup of a wry but undeniable dad joke.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data from 1975 to 2022 revealed a positive correlation between the popularity of the first name Krysta and the points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. The correlation coefficient of 0.5242463 indicated a moderate positive relationship between these two variables. It seems that the name Krysta might possess some mystical power over the outcome of this prestigious sporting event - one might even say it's as magical as a spell cast by a dad magician.

The r-squared value of 0.2748342 indicated that approximately 27.48% of the variability in the points scored by the winning team could be explained by the popularity of the name Krysta. This suggests that while Krysta may not be the sole determinant of Super Bowl success, its influence is not to be underestimated - it's almost as if it's the unexpected MVP of the game.

Furthermore, the statistical significance of the correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforced the robustness of the relationship. This finding signifies that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation between the frequency of the name Krysta and the points scored by the winning team due to random chance alone is less than 1 in 100 - a probability as rare as finding a succinct, yet witty, dad joke.

In Figure 1, the scatterplot visually presents the positive association between the popularity of the name Krysta and the points scored by the victorious team in the Super Bowl. The data points, akin to the punchlines of a good dad joke, align themselves to form a discernible pattern, affirming the correlation uncovered in this investigation.

In summary, the results of this study suggest a noteworthy relationship between the prevalence of the name Krysta and the success of teams in the Super Bowl. This peculiar association raises intriguing questions about the potential influence of individual names on the outcomes of major sporting events and invites further investigation into the curious interplay between seemingly disparate variables. One cannot help but wonder: could there be a "Krysta"l ball prediction for future Super Bowl champions?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Krysta and Points Scored by Winning Team in Super Bowl. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Krysta's Knack: The Correlation between Krysta's Popularity and Points Scored in the Super Bowl

[[ABSTRACT]]
The aim of this research was to investigate the potential link between the popularity of the first name Krysta and the points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, a quantitative analysis was conducted to address this pressing question. The results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5242463 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2022. This implies that there is indeed an intriguing association between the prevalence of the name Krysta and the success of Super Bowl teams.

Interestingly, our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Krysta increases, so does the number of points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. The implications of this peculiar correlation are both thought-provoking and memorable, much like a good dad joke. Could it be that there is a "Krysta"l clear winning trend associated with this name? One can't help but wonder if the success of the Super Bowl teams somehow hinges on the popularity of individuals bearing the name Krysta. Further research is warranted to unravel the complexities of this unexpected association and to discern whether other names hold similar sway over sporting events.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The subject of naming patterns and their influence on various societal phenomena has captivated researchers for decades. Smith et al. (2010) examined the correlations between first names and sports outcomes, shedding light on the potential influence of nomenclature on athletic success. Doe and Jones (2015) extended this line of inquiry by investigating the impact of popular given names on the performance of professional sports teams. These sobering investigations provided a foundation for delving into the vexing question of whether the name Krysta holds any sway over the points scored in the esteemed event of the Super Bowl.
In "Trends in American Naming" by Lee (2003), the author delves into the complex landscape of first name popularity and its implications for societal trends. Lee's comprehensive analysis provides insight into the ebb and flow of naming patterns and their potential repercussions on various domains, including sports. In "The Power of Names" by Schwarz (2017), the author explores the psychological and social significance of names, offering a compelling perspective on the potential influence of names on individual and collective achievements.
Moreover, fictional works such as "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "The Name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco offer tantalizing narratives surrounding the weight of names and their impact on events - albeit in a more fantastical context. These literary forays into the realm of names and their connotations serve as a reminder of the enduring allure of the subject matter and prompt further contemplation regarding its potential real-world implications.
Intriguingly, television series such as "Alias" and "The Americans" provide fictional yet captivating explorations of the significance of nomenclature and its role in shaping identities and outcomes. These popular series offer a glimpse into the multifaceted connections between names, personas, and the unfolding of events, inspiring contemplation on the potential parallels with the influence of the name Krysta on Super Bowl performances.
To aptly summarize the literature on the subject, one might say that the role of names in shaping destinies and outcomes is as engaging as a clever pun at a scholarly conference - always unexpected, often whimsical, and at times, surprisingly revelatory.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from 1975 to 2022 revealed a positive correlation between the popularity of the first name Krysta and the points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. The correlation coefficient of 0.5242463 indicated a moderate positive relationship between these two variables. It seems that the name Krysta might possess some mystical power over the outcome of this prestigious sporting event - one might even say it's as magical as a spell cast by a dad magician.
The r-squared value of 0.2748342 indicated that approximately 27.48% of the variability in the points scored by the winning team could be explained by the popularity of the name Krysta. This suggests that while Krysta may not be the sole determinant of Super Bowl success, its influence is not to be underestimated - it's almost as if it's the unexpected MVP of the game.
Furthermore, the statistical significance of the correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforced the robustness of the relationship. This finding signifies that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation between the frequency of the name Krysta and the points scored by the winning team due to random chance alone is less than 1 in 100 - a probability as rare as finding a succinct, yet witty, dad joke.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot visually presents the positive association between the popularity of the name Krysta and the points scored by the victorious team in the Super Bowl. The data points, akin to the punchlines of a good dad joke, align themselves to form a discernible pattern, affirming the correlation uncovered in this investigation.
In summary, the results of this study suggest a noteworthy relationship between the prevalence of the name Krysta and the success of teams in the Super Bowl. This peculiar association raises intriguing questions about the potential influence of individual names on the outcomes of major sporting events and invites further investigation into the curious interplay between seemingly disparate variables. One cannot help but wonder: could there be a "Krysta"l ball prediction for future Super Bowl champions?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study lend support to prior research suggesting that there may indeed be a captivating correlation between the popularity of the name Krysta and the points scored by the winning team in the illustrious event of the Super Bowl. The moderate positive relationship observed between these variables is as surprising as finding a statistical outlier in a dataset - it catches one off guard, but it's undeniably intriguing.

Our results align with the work of Smith et al. (2010) and Doe and Jones (2015), who hinted at the potential impact of nomenclature on sporting triumphs. While some may view the connection between a name and a sporting event as improbable as a pun about statistics, our data suggest that there may be more to this relationship than meets the eye.

The statistical significance of the correlation coefficient in our analysis, with a p-value of less than 0.01, echoes the empirically grounded assertions put forth by Lee (2003) regarding the societal implications of naming patterns. This suggests that the burgeoning popularity of the name Krysta may indeed hold a tangible influence over the outcome of the Super Bowl - a notion as confounding as a paradox in economic theory.

Moreover, our findings conjure up the possibility that the effect of the name Krysta on Super Bowl outcomes could be akin to an overlooked variable in a complex statistical model. Just as a hidden confounding factor can confound the results of an analysis, the presence of the name Krysta in the zeitgeist may have been quietly shaping the destiny of Super Bowl champions all along.

The r-squared value of 0.2748342 implies that nearly 28% of the variability in the points scored by the winning team can be attributed to the popularity of the name Krysta. While this proportion may not be as substantial as the pressure experienced by a dad trying to come up with the perfect dad joke, it nevertheless underscores the relevance of this name in the context of the Super Bowl.

In light of these findings, it is evident that the influence of individual names on major sporting events warrants further investigation. The implications of our results are as weighty as the delivery of a good dad joke - they are unexpectedly impactful and leave a lasting impression. Perhaps it's time to ponder anew the age-old question: "What's in a name?" As our study suggests, the answer might hold more significance than one could ever have imagined.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Krysta and Points Scored by Winning Team in Super Bowl. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Krysta's Knack: The Correlation between Krysta's Popularity and Points Scored in the Super Bowl

[[ABSTRACT]]
The aim of this research was to investigate the potential link between the popularity of the first name Krysta and the points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, a quantitative analysis was conducted to address this pressing question. The results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5242463 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2022. This implies that there is indeed an intriguing association between the prevalence of the name Krysta and the success of Super Bowl teams.

Interestingly, our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Krysta increases, so does the number of points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. The implications of this peculiar correlation are both thought-provoking and memorable, much like a good dad joke. Could it be that there is a "Krysta"l clear winning trend associated with this name? One can't help but wonder if the success of the Super Bowl teams somehow hinges on the popularity of individuals bearing the name Krysta. Further research is warranted to unravel the complexities of this unexpected association and to discern whether other names hold similar sway over sporting events.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of sports and nomenclature presents an intriguing field of study, akin to a pun about data analysis - it requires a keen eye and a good sense of humor. The influence of seemingly unrelated factors on the outcome of athletic events has long fascinated researchers and armchair statisticians alike. In this vein, we endeavored to explore the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Krysta and the points scored by the victorious team in the grand spectacle of American football that is the Super Bowl.
One might say that our pursuit of this correlation was as relentless as a parent's quest for the perfect dad joke - thorough, unwavering, and at times, amusingly unexpected. As we delved into the realms of historical naming trends and sports statistics, we could not help but ponder the potential significance of a seemingly arbitrary variable such as a person's given name on the prowess of elite athletes.
The aim of this research was to blend the rigors of statistical analysis with the levity of a well-timed quip; to discern whether the popularity of the name Krysta harbors any discernible influence over the outcome of one of the most-watched sporting events in the world. Our findings promise to be as illuminating as a light bulb in a STEM laboratory, shedding light on a hitherto overlooked facet of sports dynamics.
Embarking on this scholarly escapade, we aimed to uncover if there exists a statistically meaningful relationship between the frequency of the name Krysta and the number of points accrued by the triumphant team in the Super Bowl. Would the data reveal a correlation as conspicuous as a neon sign, or would it prove as elusive as a playful quip in the midst of a serious conversation? The results of our investigation beckon curiosity, much like the setup of a wry but undeniable dad joke.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from 1975 to 2022 revealed a positive correlation between the popularity of the first name Krysta and the points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. The correlation coefficient of 0.5242463 indicated a moderate positive relationship between these two variables. It seems that the name Krysta might possess some mystical power over the outcome of this prestigious sporting event - one might even say it's as magical as a spell cast by a dad magician.
The r-squared value of 0.2748342 indicated that approximately 27.48% of the variability in the points scored by the winning team could be explained by the popularity of the name Krysta. This suggests that while Krysta may not be the sole determinant of Super Bowl success, its influence is not to be underestimated - it's almost as if it's the unexpected MVP of the game.
Furthermore, the statistical significance of the correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforced the robustness of the relationship. This finding signifies that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation between the frequency of the name Krysta and the points scored by the winning team due to random chance alone is less than 1 in 100 - a probability as rare as finding a succinct, yet witty, dad joke.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot visually presents the positive association between the popularity of the name Krysta and the points scored by the victorious team in the Super Bowl. The data points, akin to the punchlines of a good dad joke, align themselves to form a discernible pattern, affirming the correlation uncovered in this investigation.
In summary, the results of this study suggest a noteworthy relationship between the prevalence of the name Krysta and the success of teams in the Super Bowl. This peculiar association raises intriguing questions about the potential influence of individual names on the outcomes of major sporting events and invites further investigation into the curious interplay between seemingly disparate variables. One cannot help but wonder: could there be a "Krysta"l ball prediction for future Super Bowl champions?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a statistically significant and curiously amusing correlation between the popularity of the first name Krysta and the points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. It appears that the name Krysta might exert a mysterious influence over the outcomes of this revered sporting event, leading one to wonder if there's a touch of magic in this name, akin to a wizard's spell that makes a dad joke irresistible.

Our findings, as surprising as stumbling upon a pun in a serious academic paper, prompt further inquiry into the underlying mechanisms that might explain this unlikely association. Perhaps there's a statistical "Krysta"l ball that could predict future Super Bowl victors, much like a crystal ball foretelling dad jokes at a family gathering.

The moderate positive relationship we've observed between the popularity of the name Krysta and the points scored by the triumphant team is as perplexing as a statistical anomaly in a dataset – adding a layer of intrigue to the enigmatic nature of this correlation. It's almost as if Krysta has become the unexpected MVP, proving that in the realm of sports, as in life, there's always room for a surprise contender.

Nevertheless, we must approach our conclusions with the same cautious skepticism as one would a seemingly flawless dad joke – while compelling, they require additional validation and scrutiny. Thus, we assert that further research in this area may not be warranted. After all, sometimes a statistical quirk is simply too delightful to be subjected to further analysis.

In closing, our study has not only highlighted the unexpected interplay between the name Krysta and the Super Bowl victory margins but also underscored the enduring caprice of statistical relationships. Just as a good dad joke defies explanation, so too does the correlation uncovered in this investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Krysta's Knack: The Correlation between Krysta's Popularity and Points Scored in the Super Bowl. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Quantitative Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Krysta's Knack: The Correlation between Krysta's Popularity and Points Scored in the Super Bowl. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Social Dynamics and Sports Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Krysta's Knack: The Correlation between Krysta's Popularity and Points Scored in the Super Bowl with an abstract of The aim of this research was to investigate the potential link between the popularity of the first name Krysta and the points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, a quantitative analysis was conducted to address this pressing question. The results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.5242463 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2022. This implies that there is indeed an intriguing association between the prevalence of the name Krysta and the success of Super Bowl teams.
Interestingly, our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Krysta increases, so does the number of points scored by the winning team in the Super Bowl. The implications of this peculiar correlation are both thought-provoking and memorable, much like a good dad joke. Could it be that there is a "Krysta"l clear winning trend associated with this name? One can't help but wonder if the success of the Super Bowl teams somehow hinges on the popularity of individuals bearing the name Krysta. Further research is warranted to unravel the complexities of this unexpected association and to discern whether other names hold similar sway over sporting events.

ChatGPT:

"Krysta popularity Super Bowl correlation, US Social Security Administration data, Wikipedia data, quantitative analysis, correlation coefficient 0.5242463, statistically significant, Super Bowl winning team points scored, name popularity and Super Bowl success, Krysta name association with Super Bowl success, Krysta and Super Bowl team points, name influence on sporting events"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Krysta
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Krysta
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Krysta

Points Scored by Winning Team in Super Bowl
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Points Scored by Winning Team in Super Bowl

Correlation r = 0.5242463 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.2748342 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 27.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Points Scored by Winning Team in Super Bowl) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Krysta) over the 48 years from 1975 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00013. 0.0001310357177473585000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.52 in 0.013% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 7,632 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 47 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 47 because we have two variables measured over a period of 48 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.28, 0.7 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
197519761977197819791980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Krysta (Babies born)3628506085861081511611842462933073432782962643254192772662101951861601371391361301211068777676365423228331818101314007
Points Scored by Winning Team in Super Bowl (Points scored)162132273531272627383846394220552037523049273531342334204832242129172731312134432824343313313113




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([36,28,50,60,85,86,108,151,161,184,246,293,307,343,278,296,264,325,419,277,266,210,195,186,160,137,139,136,130,121,106,87,77,67,63,65,42,32,28,33,18,18,10,13,14,0,0,7,])
array_2 = np.array([16,21,32,27,35,31,27,26,27,38,38,46,39,42,20,55,20,37,52,30,49,27,35,31,34,23,34,20,48,32,24,21,29,17,27,31,31,21,34,43,28,24,34,33,13,31,31,13,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Krysta"
array_2_name = "Points Scored by Winning Team in Super Bowl"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 1679 · Black Variable ID: 3610 · Red Variable ID: 532
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0