about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,568 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Columbus and the second variable is Motor vehicle thefts in Ohio.  The chart goes from 1985 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air quality improved, it turns out the smog was actually forming a thin, invisible layer of protection on cars, making them slipperier and harder to grip onto for would-be thieves. So, once the air cleared, so did the opportunity for easy heists, leaving the thieves baffled as they struggled to get a handle on the situation. It seems, in this case, the real crime was air pollution itself!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image in a 3D Pixar style where the cityscape of Columbus is shrouded in a hazy smog, with the silhouette of towering buildings in the background. In the foreground, a parked car with a broken window sits, hinting at a recent theft. The scene should be rendered in a way that evokes a sense of mystery and intrigue, with attention to atmospheric lighting and subtle details to convey the mood. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Unhealthy air quality in Columbus and Motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Art nouveau Magic realism An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie 3D Pixar Style Oragami
ChatGPT: 3D Pixar Style

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Unhealthy air quality in Columbus and Motor vehicle thefts in Ohio together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Columbus, a hazy smog hangs over the city as a parked car's broken window reveals it has been the victim of a theft.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ 3D Pixar Style ] and depicting this scene: In Columbus, a hazy smog hangs over the city as a parked car's broken window reveals it has been the victim of a theft. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image in a 3D Pixar style where the cityscape of Columbus is shrouded in a hazy smog, with the silhouette of towering buildings in the background. In the foreground, a parked car with a broken window sits, hinting at a recent theft. The scene should be rendered in a way that evokes a sense of mystery and intrigue, with attention to atmospheric lighting and subtle details to convey the mood.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Columbus caused Motor vehicle thefts in Ohio to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ohio

Journal of Ecological Criminology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbus and Motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7464576 and p < 0.01 for 1985 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the potential association between air pollution in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 1985 to 2022, we uncover an intriguing relationship. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.7464576 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a potentially impactful linkage. We delve into the implications of these findings and discuss the potential mechanisms underlying such a connection. Our study provides valuable insights into the multifaceted ramifications of environmental quality on criminal activities, shedding light on an unexpected correlation amidst the haze of urban challenges.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbus and Motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the potential association between air pollution in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 1985 to 2022, we uncover an intriguing relationship. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.7464576 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a potentially impactful linkage. We delve into the implications of these findings and discuss the potential mechanisms underlying such a connection. Our study provides valuable insights into the multifaceted ramifications of environmental quality on criminal activities, shedding light on an unexpected correlation amidst the haze of urban challenges.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

As the old expression goes, "Where there's smog, there's bound to be theft in the fog." Okay, that might not be an actual saying, but the possibility of a connection between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio raises intriguing questions. It's as if the particles in the air aren't the only things getting stolen in Columbus.

In recent years, the issue of air quality has skyrocketed in relevance, akin to a hot air balloon caught in an updraft. Simultaneously, motor vehicle thefts have continued to rev their engines in the realm of criminal activities, creating an unexpected overlap between pollution levels and purloined cars. As researchers, we couldn't resist the opportunity to explore this uncharted territory, knowing full well that the path to uncovering a correlation may be as winding and convoluted as a drive through rush hour traffic.

In this paper, we present the findings of our investigation into the potential association between the air pollution levels in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. Our aim is not to simply blow hot air, but rather to shed light on a possible relationship that could have implications as noteworthy as an SUV navigating a snow-covered road. By utilizing data spanning nearly four decades, we endeavor to unravel and dissect the statistical ties that bind, providing insight into the hazy interplay between environmental factors and criminal behavior. The road ahead promises a unique blend of quantitative analysis and speculative interpretation, much like maneuvering through an unpredictable storm with only a faulty GPS as a guide. So buckle up and join us as we embark on this unforeseen journey into the interconnected realms of pollution and crime.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbus and Motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the potential association between air pollution in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 1985 to 2022, we uncover an intriguing relationship. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.7464576 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a potentially impactful linkage. We delve into the implications of these findings and discuss the potential mechanisms underlying such a connection. Our study provides valuable insights into the multifaceted ramifications of environmental quality on criminal activities, shedding light on an unexpected correlation amidst the haze of urban challenges.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
As the old expression goes, "Where there's smog, there's bound to be theft in the fog." Okay, that might not be an actual saying, but the possibility of a connection between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio raises intriguing questions. It's as if the particles in the air aren't the only things getting stolen in Columbus.
In recent years, the issue of air quality has skyrocketed in relevance, akin to a hot air balloon caught in an updraft. Simultaneously, motor vehicle thefts have continued to rev their engines in the realm of criminal activities, creating an unexpected overlap between pollution levels and purloined cars. As researchers, we couldn't resist the opportunity to explore this uncharted territory, knowing full well that the path to uncovering a correlation may be as winding and convoluted as a drive through rush hour traffic.
In this paper, we present the findings of our investigation into the potential association between the air pollution levels in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. Our aim is not to simply blow hot air, but rather to shed light on a possible relationship that could have implications as noteworthy as an SUV navigating a snow-covered road. By utilizing data spanning nearly four decades, we endeavor to unravel and dissect the statistical ties that bind, providing insight into the hazy interplay between environmental factors and criminal behavior. The road ahead promises a unique blend of quantitative analysis and speculative interpretation, much like maneuvering through an unpredictable storm with only a faulty GPS as a guide. So buckle up and join us as we embark on this unforeseen journey into the interconnected realms of pollution and crime.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To begin this review, one must first consider the foundational studies laying the groundwork for our understanding of air pollution and its potential impact on criminal activities. Smith et al. (2010) examined the effects of air pollution on urban environments, providing a comprehensive analysis of the various pollutants and their dispersion patterns. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the social implications of environmental degradation, offering insight into the complex interplay between pollution and public health.

Moving beyond the realm of academic research, let us turn our attention to real-world accounts of environmental challenges and criminal intrigue. "The Air We Breathe: A Study of Urban Pollutants" by Greenfield (2012) and "Toxic Cities: Navigating Environmental Hazards" by Waters (2018) offer substantive discussions on the detrimental effects of air pollution, painting a bleak yet informative picture of the urban landscape. Furthermore, the fictional narratives of "The Smog Conspiracy" by Parker (2005) and "Diesel Driven Desires" by Sullivan (2017) present tantalizing tales that weave pollution and crime into captivating storylines.

Expanding our purview beyond the written word, let us not underestimate the impact of cinematic interpretations of environmental challenges and criminal activities. Movies such as "The Fast and the Furious: Smog City" and "Gone in 60 PPM" provide cinematic glimpses into the intersection of vehicular velocity and urban air quality. While these films may entertain with their adrenaline-fueled chases, they subtly hint at the underlying dynamics between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts, albeit under the guise of Hollywood glamour.

As we traverse the landscape of literature and media, it becomes evident that the link between air pollution in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio is a topic ripe for exploration, with implications reaching beyond the confines of traditional research. The convergence of environmental factors and criminal behaviors presents a mosaic of complexities, interwoven with potential insights and an occasional comedic twist.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbus and Motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1985 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the potential association between air pollution in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 1985 to 2022, we uncover an intriguing relationship. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.7464576 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a potentially impactful linkage. We delve into the implications of these findings and discuss the potential mechanisms underlying such a connection. Our study provides valuable insights into the multifaceted ramifications of environmental quality on criminal activities, shedding light on an unexpected correlation amidst the haze of urban challenges.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
As the old expression goes, "Where there's smog, there's bound to be theft in the fog." Okay, that might not be an actual saying, but the possibility of a connection between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio raises intriguing questions. It's as if the particles in the air aren't the only things getting stolen in Columbus.
In recent years, the issue of air quality has skyrocketed in relevance, akin to a hot air balloon caught in an updraft. Simultaneously, motor vehicle thefts have continued to rev their engines in the realm of criminal activities, creating an unexpected overlap between pollution levels and purloined cars. As researchers, we couldn't resist the opportunity to explore this uncharted territory, knowing full well that the path to uncovering a correlation may be as winding and convoluted as a drive through rush hour traffic.
In this paper, we present the findings of our investigation into the potential association between the air pollution levels in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. Our aim is not to simply blow hot air, but rather to shed light on a possible relationship that could have implications as noteworthy as an SUV navigating a snow-covered road. By utilizing data spanning nearly four decades, we endeavor to unravel and dissect the statistical ties that bind, providing insight into the hazy interplay between environmental factors and criminal behavior. The road ahead promises a unique blend of quantitative analysis and speculative interpretation, much like maneuvering through an unpredictable storm with only a faulty GPS as a guide. So buckle up and join us as we embark on this unforeseen journey into the interconnected realms of pollution and crime.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

Data Collection
To uncover the potential association between air pollution levels in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio, we embarked on a data collection journey reminiscent of navigating through a dense fog. We acquired air quality data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which provided us with a comprehensive set of air pollution measurements spanning from 1985 to 2022. The choice of data from the EPA ensured that we were not merely inhaling half-baked statistics, but rather working with a substantial dataset that could provide a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental research.

On the road to understanding the potential link between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts, we also harnessed data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. This unconventional combination of sources allowed us to paint a portrait not only of the atmospheric conditions in Columbus but also of the shifting landscape of motor vehicle thefts across Ohio. We ensured our data dance partners were in sync, resulting in a symphony of information that was as harmonious as a well-tuned engine.

Data Analysis
Our data analysis process involved more twists and turns than a driver navigating a winding mountain road. Utilizing the acquired datasets, we commenced by performing a rigorous statistical analysis to examine the relationship between air pollution levels and motor vehicle thefts. We calculated correlation coefficients, such as Pearson’s r, with a precision that could rival the accuracy of a GPS system guiding a lost traveler. Nonetheless, it was imperative to remember that correlation does not imply causation, just as the presence of road signs does not guarantee a smooth journey.

To establish the strength and significance of the potential association, we conducted hypothesis testing using a p-value with a threshold as strict as a traffic cop enforcing the speed limit. The statistical analyses were carried out with a level of caution akin to a driver navigating treacherous road conditions, ensuring that our findings were not merely a mirage on the horizon.

Limitations
Just as a driver must acknowledge the limitations of their vehicle, we recognize the constraints of our study. While we strived to capture the essence of the connection between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts, our research is not immune to limitations. The data sources utilized, while robust, may not encapsulate the entirety of air pollution dynamics or criminal activities. Moreover, the complexity of environmental and criminal behavior factors poses a challenge akin to maneuvering through an intricate maze with no clear path.

Additionally, our study’s timeframe spans over several decades, during which societal, economic, and technological changes have undoubtedly left their marks on environmental regulations, vehicle security measures, and criminal trends. Nevertheless, we proceed with the understanding that no research endeavor is free from bumps in the road.

Conclusion
In the pursuit of uncovering an unexpected link between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts, our methodology has traversed a route as convoluted as a rush hour commute. Embracing the data collected from the EPA and the FBI, we employed statistical tools to navigate through the haze of information and unearth a statistically significant correlation. This correlation may not offer a direct route to causation, but it certainly presents a scenic detour for future investigations into the interplay of environmental and criminal dynamics.

Our study, like a supped-up car revving its engines, provides a glimpse into the potential connections between environmental quality and criminal activities. As we proceed with caution, aware of the twists and turns inherent in research, we invite fellow travelers to join us on this unexpected journey into the interconnected realms of pollution and crime.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbus and Motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1985 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7464576, r-squared of 0.5571990, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the potential association between air pollution in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 1985 to 2022, we uncover an intriguing relationship. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.7464576 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a potentially impactful linkage. We delve into the implications of these findings and discuss the potential mechanisms underlying such a connection. Our study provides valuable insights into the multifaceted ramifications of environmental quality on criminal activities, shedding light on an unexpected correlation amidst the haze of urban challenges.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
As the old expression goes, "Where there's smog, there's bound to be theft in the fog." Okay, that might not be an actual saying, but the possibility of a connection between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio raises intriguing questions. It's as if the particles in the air aren't the only things getting stolen in Columbus.
In recent years, the issue of air quality has skyrocketed in relevance, akin to a hot air balloon caught in an updraft. Simultaneously, motor vehicle thefts have continued to rev their engines in the realm of criminal activities, creating an unexpected overlap between pollution levels and purloined cars. As researchers, we couldn't resist the opportunity to explore this uncharted territory, knowing full well that the path to uncovering a correlation may be as winding and convoluted as a drive through rush hour traffic.
In this paper, we present the findings of our investigation into the potential association between the air pollution levels in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. Our aim is not to simply blow hot air, but rather to shed light on a possible relationship that could have implications as noteworthy as an SUV navigating a snow-covered road. By utilizing data spanning nearly four decades, we endeavor to unravel and dissect the statistical ties that bind, providing insight into the hazy interplay between environmental factors and criminal behavior. The road ahead promises a unique blend of quantitative analysis and speculative interpretation, much like maneuvering through an unpredictable storm with only a faulty GPS as a guide. So buckle up and join us as we embark on this unforeseen journey into the interconnected realms of pollution and crime.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a significant correlation between air pollution levels in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio from 1985 to 2022. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.7464576, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. In other words, it seems that as the air quality in Columbus took a nosedive, the incidence of motor vehicle thefts revved up like a high-speed car chase.

The r-squared value of 0.5571990 further emphasizes the robustness of this relationship, suggesting that approximately 55.72% of the variability in motor vehicle thefts can be explained by fluctuations in air pollution levels. It's as if the polluted air was whispering to potential car thieves, "Take a deep breath, and then take a car."

Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant. This is not just a case of correlation being a mere coincidence; it's a bona fide connection backed by statistical evidence. As surprising as finding a tricycle parked in a motorcycle-only zone.

Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the unmistakable positive correlation between air pollution levels and motor vehicle thefts. The scatterplot is an ode to the adage "where there's smoke, there's fire," or in this case, "where there's smog, there's a stolen car."

In conclusion, our research indicates that there is indeed a compelling association between air pollution in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. These findings shine a light on the unexpected relationship between environmental quality and criminal activities, making this correlation as clear as the smog in the Columbus air.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbus and Motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the potential association between air pollution in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 1985 to 2022, we uncover an intriguing relationship. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.7464576 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a potentially impactful linkage. We delve into the implications of these findings and discuss the potential mechanisms underlying such a connection. Our study provides valuable insights into the multifaceted ramifications of environmental quality on criminal activities, shedding light on an unexpected correlation amidst the haze of urban challenges.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To begin this review, one must first consider the foundational studies laying the groundwork for our understanding of air pollution and its potential impact on criminal activities. Smith et al. (2010) examined the effects of air pollution on urban environments, providing a comprehensive analysis of the various pollutants and their dispersion patterns. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the social implications of environmental degradation, offering insight into the complex interplay between pollution and public health.
Moving beyond the realm of academic research, let us turn our attention to real-world accounts of environmental challenges and criminal intrigue. "The Air We Breathe: A Study of Urban Pollutants" by Greenfield (2012) and "Toxic Cities: Navigating Environmental Hazards" by Waters (2018) offer substantive discussions on the detrimental effects of air pollution, painting a bleak yet informative picture of the urban landscape. Furthermore, the fictional narratives of "The Smog Conspiracy" by Parker (2005) and "Diesel Driven Desires" by Sullivan (2017) present tantalizing tales that weave pollution and crime into captivating storylines.
Expanding our purview beyond the written word, let us not underestimate the impact of cinematic interpretations of environmental challenges and criminal activities. Movies such as "The Fast and the Furious: Smog City" and "Gone in 60 PPM" provide cinematic glimpses into the intersection of vehicular velocity and urban air quality. While these films may entertain with their adrenaline-fueled chases, they subtly hint at the underlying dynamics between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts, albeit under the guise of Hollywood glamour.
As we traverse the landscape of literature and media, it becomes evident that the link between air pollution in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio is a topic ripe for exploration, with implications reaching beyond the confines of traditional research. The convergence of environmental factors and criminal behaviors presents a mosaic of complexities, interwoven with potential insights and an occasional comedic twist.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a significant correlation between air pollution levels in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio from 1985 to 2022. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.7464576, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. In other words, it seems that as the air quality in Columbus took a nosedive, the incidence of motor vehicle thefts revved up like a high-speed car chase.
The r-squared value of 0.5571990 further emphasizes the robustness of this relationship, suggesting that approximately 55.72% of the variability in motor vehicle thefts can be explained by fluctuations in air pollution levels. It's as if the polluted air was whispering to potential car thieves, "Take a deep breath, and then take a car."
Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant. This is not just a case of correlation being a mere coincidence; it's a bona fide connection backed by statistical evidence. As surprising as finding a tricycle parked in a motorcycle-only zone.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the unmistakable positive correlation between air pollution levels and motor vehicle thefts. The scatterplot is an ode to the adage "where there's smoke, there's fire," or in this case, "where there's smog, there's a stolen car."
In conclusion, our research indicates that there is indeed a compelling association between air pollution in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. These findings shine a light on the unexpected relationship between environmental quality and criminal activities, making this correlation as clear as the smog in the Columbus air.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The correlation we uncovered seems to be as clear as the air when a car accelerates away from a smoggy city. Our results align with previous research findings, supporting the notion that air pollution may play a role in influencing motor vehicle thefts. This unexpected linkage, akin to finding a hidden compartment in a stolen car, highlights the multifaceted complexities of urban environments.

In the literature review, we playfully touched upon the potential influence of cinematic interpretations of environmental challenges and criminal activities. Although presented in a lighthearted manner, these references subtly underscored the serious consideration of the intersection between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts. Just as action movies may entertain with high-speed car chases, they insinuate the underlying dynamics between air pollution and criminal activities. Our findings add weight to these light-hearted allusions, emphasizing the tangible impact of air quality on criminal behavior.

Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.5571990 emphasizes the robustness of this relationship, suggesting that approximately 55.72% of the variability in motor vehicle thefts can be explained by fluctuations in air pollution levels. It's as if polluted air acts as an inadvertent accomplice to car thieves, whispering, "Take a deep breath and take a car." These statistical measures substantiate the significance of the connection, as unmistakable as a siren in a car chase.

Our study provides valuable insights into the potential impact of environmental quality on criminal activities. The scatterplot reflects the unmistakable positive correlation between air pollution levels and motor vehicle thefts, akin to echoing the adage "where there's smog, there's a stolen car." Our research offers a panoramic view of the unexpected relationship between environmental quality and criminal activities, uncovering a correlation as clear as the smog in the Columbus air.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbus and Motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the potential association between air pollution in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 1985 to 2022, we uncover an intriguing relationship. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.7464576 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a potentially impactful linkage. We delve into the implications of these findings and discuss the potential mechanisms underlying such a connection. Our study provides valuable insights into the multifaceted ramifications of environmental quality on criminal activities, shedding light on an unexpected correlation amidst the haze of urban challenges.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
As the old expression goes, "Where there's smog, there's bound to be theft in the fog." Okay, that might not be an actual saying, but the possibility of a connection between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio raises intriguing questions. It's as if the particles in the air aren't the only things getting stolen in Columbus.
In recent years, the issue of air quality has skyrocketed in relevance, akin to a hot air balloon caught in an updraft. Simultaneously, motor vehicle thefts have continued to rev their engines in the realm of criminal activities, creating an unexpected overlap between pollution levels and purloined cars. As researchers, we couldn't resist the opportunity to explore this uncharted territory, knowing full well that the path to uncovering a correlation may be as winding and convoluted as a drive through rush hour traffic.
In this paper, we present the findings of our investigation into the potential association between the air pollution levels in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. Our aim is not to simply blow hot air, but rather to shed light on a possible relationship that could have implications as noteworthy as an SUV navigating a snow-covered road. By utilizing data spanning nearly four decades, we endeavor to unravel and dissect the statistical ties that bind, providing insight into the hazy interplay between environmental factors and criminal behavior. The road ahead promises a unique blend of quantitative analysis and speculative interpretation, much like maneuvering through an unpredictable storm with only a faulty GPS as a guide. So buckle up and join us as we embark on this unforeseen journey into the interconnected realms of pollution and crime.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a significant correlation between air pollution levels in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio from 1985 to 2022. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.7464576, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. In other words, it seems that as the air quality in Columbus took a nosedive, the incidence of motor vehicle thefts revved up like a high-speed car chase.
The r-squared value of 0.5571990 further emphasizes the robustness of this relationship, suggesting that approximately 55.72% of the variability in motor vehicle thefts can be explained by fluctuations in air pollution levels. It's as if the polluted air was whispering to potential car thieves, "Take a deep breath, and then take a car."
Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant. This is not just a case of correlation being a mere coincidence; it's a bona fide connection backed by statistical evidence. As surprising as finding a tricycle parked in a motorcycle-only zone.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the unmistakable positive correlation between air pollution levels and motor vehicle thefts. The scatterplot is an ode to the adage "where there's smoke, there's fire," or in this case, "where there's smog, there's a stolen car."
In conclusion, our research indicates that there is indeed a compelling association between air pollution in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. These findings shine a light on the unexpected relationship between environmental quality and criminal activities, making this correlation as clear as the smog in the Columbus air.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has unveiled an intriguing relationship between air pollution in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7464576 and the robust r-squared value of 0.5571990 have illuminated a connection as unmistakable as a car alarm blaring at 3 AM. These findings suggest that the polluted air may have acted as a siren call to aspiring car thieves, creating a web of correlation as dense as rush-hour traffic.

The implications of this association are as far-reaching as a cross-country road trip, prompting us to contemplate the intricate ways in which environmental factors intertwine with criminal behavior. Our study underscores the need for a more comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted ramifications of air pollution, extending beyond respiratory health to encompass its influence on criminal activities. It’s as if the polluted air wasn't content with simply causing allergies; it had to dabble in grand theft auto as well.

While we navigated this research endeavor with the precision and rigor of a GPS-guided tour, we acknowledge the limitations of our study, including the inability to establish causation and the reliance on aggregate data. Nonetheless, the findings provide fertile ground for future exploration, as there are still many avenues left unexplored, much like an unmarked road trip through the countryside.

Ultimately, our investigation has demonstrated that the link between air pollution in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio is not a mere figment of smog-choked imaginations. This correlation stands as solid as a car parked in a crowded lot, sparking conversations on the unexpected interplay between environmental quality and criminal activities. With our findings in hand, we assert that further research in this area is unnecessary, as we've already aired our conclusions with as much clarity as a cloudless day.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ohio. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Ecological Criminology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ohio. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Urban Ecology and Crime Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Clearing the Air: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ohio with an abstract of This paper investigates the potential association between air pollution in Columbus and motor vehicle thefts in Ohio. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 1985 to 2022, we uncover an intriguing relationship. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.7464576 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a potentially impactful linkage. We delve into the implications of these findings and discuss the potential mechanisms underlying such a connection. Our study provides valuable insights into the multifaceted ramifications of environmental quality on criminal activities, shedding light on an unexpected correlation amidst the haze of urban challenges.

ChatGPT:

air pollution Columbus, motor vehicle thefts Ohio, crime and air pollution, environmental quality and criminal activities, EPA data analysis, FBI data analysis, urban challenges correlation, air pollution impact on crime

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Columbus
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Columbus, OH
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Columbus

Motor vehicle thefts in Ohio
Detailed data title: The motor vehicle theft rate per 100,000 residents in Ohio
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Motor vehicle thefts in Ohio

Correlation r = 0.7464576 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5571990 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 55.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Motor vehicle thefts in Ohio) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Columbus) over the 38 years from 1985 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.4E-8. 0.0000000742763658164817800000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.75 in 7.4E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 13,463,233 random variables You don't actually need 13 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 37 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 37 because we have two variables measured over a period of 38 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.56, 0.86 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Columbus (Bad air quality days)9.589044.657538.7671212.29517.397269.3150719.45217.3770510.684913.972614.520513.38810.13718.630120.547911.202213.698616.98639.589047.923513.69867.3972612.91216.010931.388896.301375.753427.92351.643841.917811.369862.732240.8219180.8219180.2739730.81967200.821918
Motor vehicle thefts in Ohio (Motor Vehicle Theft rate)352.7375.7382.9399.2435.3490.6500.4471435.3427.1414.9407.5406383.8348.2343.7370.8374.9358.6355361.5330.9296.1247.7196.3183.1181.3171168.7156.2149.9170177.6170.9159.9171.7183234.5




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([9.58904,4.65753,8.76712,12.2951,7.39726,9.31507,19.4521,7.37705,10.6849,13.9726,14.5205,13.388,10.137,18.6301,20.5479,11.2022,13.6986,16.9863,9.58904,7.9235,13.6986,7.39726,12.9121,6.01093,1.38889,6.30137,5.75342,7.9235,1.64384,1.91781,1.36986,2.73224,0.821918,0.821918,0.273973,0.819672,0,0.821918,])
array_2 = np.array([352.7,375.7,382.9,399.2,435.3,490.6,500.4,471,435.3,427.1,414.9,407.5,406,383.8,348.2,343.7,370.8,374.9,358.6,355,361.5,330.9,296.1,247.7,196.3,183.1,181.3,171,168.7,156.2,149.9,170,177.6,170.9,159.9,171.7,183,234.5,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Columbus"
array_2_name = "Motor vehicle thefts in Ohio"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 1568 · Black Variable ID: 20496 · Red Variable ID: 20155
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0