about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,565 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is xkcd comics published about artificial intelligence and the second variable is US Shoe Store Sales.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As xkcd comics about artificial intelligence increased, more people became interested in AI and robotics. This led to a rise in demand for futuristic, AI-powered shoes, causing US Shoe Store Sales to increase. Looks like the real sole of the problem was a comic effect!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a cozy shoe store with a vibrant cyber folk aesthetic. Within the store, several well-dressed individuals are busy browsing the latest shoe styles, engaged in lively conversations, and sharing laughter. A small, friendly robot with a screen emitting amusing xkcd comics related to artificial intelligence is rolling by, capturing the attention of the customers and the salesperson. The scene effortlessly fuses the warmth of a shoe shopping experience with the humor of AI comics, all within the unique cyber folk style. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: xkcd comics published about artificial intelligence and US Shoe Store Sales. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A scene from Skyrim An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Cyber folk Surrealism Sci-fi fantacy
ChatGPT: Cyber folk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both xkcd comics published about artificial intelligence and US Shoe Store Sales together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy shoe store, a group of people are browsing the latest styles while chatting and laughing. At the same time, a small robot with a screen displaying funny xkcd comics about artificial intelligence rolls by, catching the attention of both the customers and the salesperson. The scene perfectly blends the charm of shoe shopping with the humor of AI comics.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyber folk ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy shoe store, a group of people are browsing the latest styles while chatting and laughing. At the same time, a small robot with a screen displaying funny xkcd comics about artificial intelligence rolls by, catching the attention of both the customers and the salesperson. The scene perfectly blends the charm of shoe shopping with the humor of AI comics. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a cozy shoe store with a vibrant cyber folk aesthetic. Within the store, several well-dressed individuals are busy browsing the latest shoe styles, engaged in lively conversations, and sharing laughter. A small, friendly robot with a screen emitting amusing xkcd comics related to artificial intelligence is rolling by, capturing the attention of the customers and the salesperson. The scene effortlessly fuses the warmth of a shoe shopping experience with the humor of AI comics, all within the unique cyber folk style.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in xkcd comics published about artificial intelligence caused US Shoe Store Sales to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Laughing Our Way to Insights: The Connection Between xkcd Comics on Artificial Intelligence and US Shoe Store Sales

Journal of Witty Research Insights

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about artificial intelligence and US Shoe Store Sales. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of xkcd comics and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6142829 and p < 0.05 for 2007 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Laughing Our Way to Insights: The Connection Between xkcd Comics on Artificial Intelligence and US Shoe Store Sales"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the fascinating and often overlooked relationship between xkcd comics focusing on artificial intelligence (AI) and the fluctuations in US shoe store sales. Through a meticulous and somewhat unconventional analysis using data from the xkcd archive and US shoe store sales from 2007 to 2021, we delve into the intersection of humor, technology, and consumer behavior. Our research team employed AI to scrutinize the xkcd comics, and we utilized data from Statista to capture the nuances of shoe store sales. The correlation coefficient of 0.6142829 and p < 0.05 unveiled a compelling connection that leaves us pondering whether the impact of hilarious AI-themed comics extends beyond just eliciting chuckles to potentially influencing consumer spending habits in the footwear industry. Our findings shed light on the delightful yet surprisingly meaningful correlations that exist in the most unexpected places within the vast and intricate web of human behavior and popular culture.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about artificial intelligence and US Shoe Store Sales. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Laughing Our Way to Insights: The Connection Between xkcd Comics on Artificial Intelligence and US Shoe Store Sales"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the fascinating and often overlooked relationship between xkcd comics focusing on artificial intelligence (AI) and the fluctuations in US shoe store sales. Through a meticulous and somewhat unconventional analysis using data from the xkcd archive and US shoe store sales from 2007 to 2021, we delve into the intersection of humor, technology, and consumer behavior. Our research team employed AI to scrutinize the xkcd comics, and we utilized data from Statista to capture the nuances of shoe store sales. The correlation coefficient of 0.6142829 and p < 0.05 unveiled a compelling connection that leaves us pondering whether the impact of hilarious AI-themed comics extends beyond just eliciting chuckles to potentially influencing consumer spending habits in the footwear industry. Our findings shed light on the delightful yet surprisingly meaningful correlations that exist in the most unexpected places within the vast and intricate web of human behavior and popular culture.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) and consumer behavior has long been a subject of interest and bewilderment. Through the lens of humor, this study seeks to shift the focus from traditional narratives to the uncharted territory of xkcd comics. Created by Randall Munroe, these webcomics have gained a cult following for their witty, often wry commentary on technology, science, and the quirks of everyday life. And what better way to examine their influence than by investigating their potential impact on an industry as fundamental as shoe store sales?

In the realm of statistical inquiry, it is not every day that one stumbles across a correlation as peculiar and amusing as the one we have uncovered. If we may indulge in a moment of intellectual whimsy, the notion that a webcomic series featuring stick figures and astute AI jokes could be linked to the fluctuations in shoe store sales may appear initially preposterous. However, as they say, truth is often stranger than fiction.

As we embark on this empirical voyage, it is important to acknowledge the inherent unpredictability of human behavior. Individuals, much like shoe styles, come in all shapes and sizes, and unraveling the peculiarities of their spending patterns demands an interdisciplinary approach. Consequently, we sit at the intersection of humor, technology, and consumer preferences—a place where statistical analysis and comedic musings coexist in an unlikely yet curiously harmonious symphony.

With the rise of AI and its integration into various facets of daily life, it seems only fitting that we explore the comedic discourse surrounding this complex subject matter. The choice of footwear, as an essential component of individual expression and comfort, serves as a tangible lens through which to examine the potential influence of AI-themed humor on consumers. It brings to mind the age-old question: If a joke about AI falls in a comic strip and no one is around to hear it, does it still impact shoe sales? Or, perhaps more pressingly, can humor about AI walk the thin line between lighthearted jest and unexpectedly driving economic trends?

Throughout history, societal trends and technological advancements have entwined in unexpected ways. The fabled "butterfly effect" of chaos theory comes to mind, reminding us that seemingly unrelated events may in fact be intricately connected. Thus, with a twinkle in our eye and a stack of xkcd archives at our disposal, we venture forth to unravel the comedy of errors that lies hidden amidst the labyrinth of consumer choices and pop cultural phenomena. It is in this spirit of inquisitiveness and lighthearted inquiry that we present our findings, with a hope that our conclusions may elicit both nods of agreement and bemused quizzical expressions from our esteemed readers.

With this backdrop in mind, we invite you to join us in our exploration of the captivating interplay between xkcd's comedic genius and the labyrinthine maze of footwear consumer behavior, for as we are about to demonstrate, the laughter that these comics provoke might just have deeper, more unexpected footprints than one might initially assume.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about artificial intelligence and US Shoe Store Sales. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Laughing Our Way to Insights: The Connection Between xkcd Comics on Artificial Intelligence and US Shoe Store Sales"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the fascinating and often overlooked relationship between xkcd comics focusing on artificial intelligence (AI) and the fluctuations in US shoe store sales. Through a meticulous and somewhat unconventional analysis using data from the xkcd archive and US shoe store sales from 2007 to 2021, we delve into the intersection of humor, technology, and consumer behavior. Our research team employed AI to scrutinize the xkcd comics, and we utilized data from Statista to capture the nuances of shoe store sales. The correlation coefficient of 0.6142829 and p < 0.05 unveiled a compelling connection that leaves us pondering whether the impact of hilarious AI-themed comics extends beyond just eliciting chuckles to potentially influencing consumer spending habits in the footwear industry. Our findings shed light on the delightful yet surprisingly meaningful correlations that exist in the most unexpected places within the vast and intricate web of human behavior and popular culture.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) and consumer behavior has long been a subject of interest and bewilderment. Through the lens of humor, this study seeks to shift the focus from traditional narratives to the uncharted territory of xkcd comics. Created by Randall Munroe, these webcomics have gained a cult following for their witty, often wry commentary on technology, science, and the quirks of everyday life. And what better way to examine their influence than by investigating their potential impact on an industry as fundamental as shoe store sales?
In the realm of statistical inquiry, it is not every day that one stumbles across a correlation as peculiar and amusing as the one we have uncovered. If we may indulge in a moment of intellectual whimsy, the notion that a webcomic series featuring stick figures and astute AI jokes could be linked to the fluctuations in shoe store sales may appear initially preposterous. However, as they say, truth is often stranger than fiction.
As we embark on this empirical voyage, it is important to acknowledge the inherent unpredictability of human behavior. Individuals, much like shoe styles, come in all shapes and sizes, and unraveling the peculiarities of their spending patterns demands an interdisciplinary approach. Consequently, we sit at the intersection of humor, technology, and consumer preferences—a place where statistical analysis and comedic musings coexist in an unlikely yet curiously harmonious symphony.
With the rise of AI and its integration into various facets of daily life, it seems only fitting that we explore the comedic discourse surrounding this complex subject matter. The choice of footwear, as an essential component of individual expression and comfort, serves as a tangible lens through which to examine the potential influence of AI-themed humor on consumers. It brings to mind the age-old question: If a joke about AI falls in a comic strip and no one is around to hear it, does it still impact shoe sales? Or, perhaps more pressingly, can humor about AI walk the thin line between lighthearted jest and unexpectedly driving economic trends?
Throughout history, societal trends and technological advancements have entwined in unexpected ways. The fabled "butterfly effect" of chaos theory comes to mind, reminding us that seemingly unrelated events may in fact be intricately connected. Thus, with a twinkle in our eye and a stack of xkcd archives at our disposal, we venture forth to unravel the comedy of errors that lies hidden amidst the labyrinth of consumer choices and pop cultural phenomena. It is in this spirit of inquisitiveness and lighthearted inquiry that we present our findings, with a hope that our conclusions may elicit both nods of agreement and bemused quizzical expressions from our esteemed readers.
With this backdrop in mind, we invite you to join us in our exploration of the captivating interplay between xkcd's comedic genius and the labyrinthine maze of footwear consumer behavior, for as we are about to demonstrate, the laughter that these comics provoke might just have deeper, more unexpected footprints than one might initially assume.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between seemingly disparate elements such as online comic strips and consumer behavior has been a subject of fascination and bewilderment for scholars and aficionados alike. While the exploration of this relationship may at first glance appear to be an exercise in whimsy, recent inquiries have revealed compelling insights that warrant further investigation.

Indeed, in exploring the world of xkcd comics, authored by the astute Randall Munroe, one finds a wealth of humorous, and often thought-provoking, content pertaining to artificial intelligence. In their study, "Tech Laughs: The Influence of xkcd Comics on Public Perception of AI," Smith and Doe delve into the profound impact of Munroe's comedic portrayals of AI on the collective psyche of technology enthusiasts. Their findings indicate a notable shift in the public's perception of AI, with a significant proportion attributing their newfound AI-related humor to their engagements with xkcd comics.

Furthermore, Jones et al. in "Humor in the Age of AI: A Comedic Analysis of xkcd Webcomics," expound upon the intricate nuances of humor and technological themes in various xkcd installments. Their analysis illuminates the uncanny ability of these comics to convey complex concepts in a light-hearted yet comprehensible manner, serving as a gateway to demystifying the enigmatic realm of artificial intelligence for the layperson.

Amidst these scholarly inquiries, it is imperative to acknowledge the potential dynamics between popular culture phenomena and consumer behavior, a realm in which the intersection of humor and technology may yield unexpected implications. The literature elucidates the possibility of a latent symbiosis between seemingly unrelated domains, prompting us to ponder the ramifications of these connections on the economic tapestry.

Turning to the literary world, works such as "Artificial Absurdity: Witty Musings on Technology," by Lorem Ipsum, offer a compendium of satirical writings that mirror the essence of xkcd's brand of wry humor. Although not directly addressing the intersection of AI-related humor and consumer behavior, these literary contributions provide invaluable insights into the enduring appeal of comedic reflections on modern technological phenomena.

In a departure from non-fiction literature, the imaginative realms of fiction have also proffered narratives that resonate with the thematic threads of our inquiry. For instance, "The Cyborg Chronicles," a collection of science fiction short stories by Jane Austen, explores the interplay between artificial intelligence and societal dynamics, presenting speculative scenarios that mirror the complexities inherent in technological jest.

Akin to literary explorations, animated creations such as "The Jetsons" and "Inspector Gadget" have captivated audiences with their whimsical portrayals of futuristic technologies. While not directly addressing the specific comedic lens of AI as exhibited in xkcd comics, these animated renditions offer a canvas rich with thematic resonances, encapsulating the amalgamation of technology and human foibles in a whimsical and accessible manner.

In addition to literary and animated influences, the researchers acknowledge the impact of childhood experiences, such as the fond recollection of Saturday morning cartoons, in shaping their observational acumen and humor sensibilities. Furthermore, the authors gratefully acknowledge the inspiration provided by the stalwart comedic geniuses of yesteryear, whose timeless wit continues to inform the fabric of contemporary humorous discourse.

As the investigation progresses, it is imperative to embrace the diverse array of influences that have shaped the perceptive lens through which we approach this research endeavor. With an unwavering commitment to scholarly rigor and a steadfast dedication to unraveling the complexities of human behavior, the authors aim to navigate the sinuous pathways of popular culture and consumer trends in the pursuit of scholarly elucidation and, with any fortune, the occasional chuckle.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about artificial intelligence and US Shoe Store Sales. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of xkcd comics and Statista . You used data from 2007 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Laughing Our Way to Insights: The Connection Between xkcd Comics on Artificial Intelligence and US Shoe Store Sales"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the fascinating and often overlooked relationship between xkcd comics focusing on artificial intelligence (AI) and the fluctuations in US shoe store sales. Through a meticulous and somewhat unconventional analysis using data from the xkcd archive and US shoe store sales from 2007 to 2021, we delve into the intersection of humor, technology, and consumer behavior. Our research team employed AI to scrutinize the xkcd comics, and we utilized data from Statista to capture the nuances of shoe store sales. The correlation coefficient of 0.6142829 and p < 0.05 unveiled a compelling connection that leaves us pondering whether the impact of hilarious AI-themed comics extends beyond just eliciting chuckles to potentially influencing consumer spending habits in the footwear industry. Our findings shed light on the delightful yet surprisingly meaningful correlations that exist in the most unexpected places within the vast and intricate web of human behavior and popular culture.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) and consumer behavior has long been a subject of interest and bewilderment. Through the lens of humor, this study seeks to shift the focus from traditional narratives to the uncharted territory of xkcd comics. Created by Randall Munroe, these webcomics have gained a cult following for their witty, often wry commentary on technology, science, and the quirks of everyday life. And what better way to examine their influence than by investigating their potential impact on an industry as fundamental as shoe store sales?
In the realm of statistical inquiry, it is not every day that one stumbles across a correlation as peculiar and amusing as the one we have uncovered. If we may indulge in a moment of intellectual whimsy, the notion that a webcomic series featuring stick figures and astute AI jokes could be linked to the fluctuations in shoe store sales may appear initially preposterous. However, as they say, truth is often stranger than fiction.
As we embark on this empirical voyage, it is important to acknowledge the inherent unpredictability of human behavior. Individuals, much like shoe styles, come in all shapes and sizes, and unraveling the peculiarities of their spending patterns demands an interdisciplinary approach. Consequently, we sit at the intersection of humor, technology, and consumer preferences—a place where statistical analysis and comedic musings coexist in an unlikely yet curiously harmonious symphony.
With the rise of AI and its integration into various facets of daily life, it seems only fitting that we explore the comedic discourse surrounding this complex subject matter. The choice of footwear, as an essential component of individual expression and comfort, serves as a tangible lens through which to examine the potential influence of AI-themed humor on consumers. It brings to mind the age-old question: If a joke about AI falls in a comic strip and no one is around to hear it, does it still impact shoe sales? Or, perhaps more pressingly, can humor about AI walk the thin line between lighthearted jest and unexpectedly driving economic trends?
Throughout history, societal trends and technological advancements have entwined in unexpected ways. The fabled "butterfly effect" of chaos theory comes to mind, reminding us that seemingly unrelated events may in fact be intricately connected. Thus, with a twinkle in our eye and a stack of xkcd archives at our disposal, we venture forth to unravel the comedy of errors that lies hidden amidst the labyrinth of consumer choices and pop cultural phenomena. It is in this spirit of inquisitiveness and lighthearted inquiry that we present our findings, with a hope that our conclusions may elicit both nods of agreement and bemused quizzical expressions from our esteemed readers.
With this backdrop in mind, we invite you to join us in our exploration of the captivating interplay between xkcd's comedic genius and the labyrinthine maze of footwear consumer behavior, for as we are about to demonstrate, the laughter that these comics provoke might just have deeper, more unexpected footprints than one might initially assume.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the potential relationship between xkcd comics on artificial intelligence (AI) and US shoe store sales, our research team employed a methodological approach that combined AI analysis, statistical correlation, and a dash of whimsy. The initial step in our methodology involved the collection of data from the expansive xkcd archive, spanning the years 2007 to 2021. This involved a meticulous sifting through the webcomics, examining each panel for any references to AI, technology, or other relevant themes that might tickle the fancy of both tech enthusiasts and statistical aficionados alike.

Utilizing state-of-the-art AI algorithms, we engaged in an intriguing dance with machine learning, teaching our algorithms to recognize and interpret the intricate nuances of AI-related humor in the xkcd comics. It was a delicate task, akin to coaxing a particularly reticent statistician to appreciate the nuances of a well-crafted pun.

Following the rather entertaining foray into the xkcd archives, we turned our attention to the data on US shoe store sales obtained from Statista. This involved analyzing the sales figures and trends over the same time period, identifying peaks and troughs, and observing any potential anomalies that might pique our statistical curiosity.

The crux of our analysis lay in the statistical examination of the collected data. We calculated the correlation coefficient between the frequency of xkcd comics on AI and the quarterly US shoe store sales, accompanied by an assessment of statistical significance. The correlation served as a barometer of the potential relationship between these seemingly disparate entities, while the assessment of significance held the key to unlocking the doors of statistical relevance.

Moreover, to ensure the robustness of our findings, we conducted a series of sensitivity analyses, subjecting the data to various statistical tests and simulations. This rigorous scrutiny was essential in safeguarding our results against the capricious whims of randomness, much like ensuring the sturdiness of a statistical house of cards.

In a departure from traditional methodologies, we also incorporated an element of qualitative analysis by eliciting responses from a panel of willing participants regarding their perceptions of AI-themed humor in relation to their shoe purchasing behavior. This not only added a human touch to our research but also provided complementary insights that transcended the sterile confines of statistical results.

Once armed with a comprehensive arsenal of statistical analyses and qualitative observations, we embarked upon the arduous yet strangely delightful task of unraveling the complexities of human behavior as reflected in shoe store sales. This process involved peering through the chinks of statistical armor with a discerning eye, gently coaxing patterns and trends to reveal their well-guarded secrets, much like convincing a comic strip character to divulge the punchline of a particularly clever joke.

In summary, our methodology blended the analytical prowess of artificial intelligence, the rigidity of statistical correlation, and the subtle art of qualitative inquiry to paint a holistic portrait of the intriguing interplay between xkcd's comedic musings on AI and the enigmatic dance of consumer behavior in the realm of footwear. The amalgamation of these diverse methodologies culminated in a rich tapestry of empirical insight, peppered with a liberal dose of intellectual whimsy and statistical rigor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about artificial intelligence and US Shoe Store Sales. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of xkcd comics and Statista .

For the time period 2007 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.6142829, r-squared of 0.3773435, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Laughing Our Way to Insights: The Connection Between xkcd Comics on Artificial Intelligence and US Shoe Store Sales"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the fascinating and often overlooked relationship between xkcd comics focusing on artificial intelligence (AI) and the fluctuations in US shoe store sales. Through a meticulous and somewhat unconventional analysis using data from the xkcd archive and US shoe store sales from 2007 to 2021, we delve into the intersection of humor, technology, and consumer behavior. Our research team employed AI to scrutinize the xkcd comics, and we utilized data from Statista to capture the nuances of shoe store sales. The correlation coefficient of 0.6142829 and p < 0.05 unveiled a compelling connection that leaves us pondering whether the impact of hilarious AI-themed comics extends beyond just eliciting chuckles to potentially influencing consumer spending habits in the footwear industry. Our findings shed light on the delightful yet surprisingly meaningful correlations that exist in the most unexpected places within the vast and intricate web of human behavior and popular culture.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) and consumer behavior has long been a subject of interest and bewilderment. Through the lens of humor, this study seeks to shift the focus from traditional narratives to the uncharted territory of xkcd comics. Created by Randall Munroe, these webcomics have gained a cult following for their witty, often wry commentary on technology, science, and the quirks of everyday life. And what better way to examine their influence than by investigating their potential impact on an industry as fundamental as shoe store sales?
In the realm of statistical inquiry, it is not every day that one stumbles across a correlation as peculiar and amusing as the one we have uncovered. If we may indulge in a moment of intellectual whimsy, the notion that a webcomic series featuring stick figures and astute AI jokes could be linked to the fluctuations in shoe store sales may appear initially preposterous. However, as they say, truth is often stranger than fiction.
As we embark on this empirical voyage, it is important to acknowledge the inherent unpredictability of human behavior. Individuals, much like shoe styles, come in all shapes and sizes, and unraveling the peculiarities of their spending patterns demands an interdisciplinary approach. Consequently, we sit at the intersection of humor, technology, and consumer preferences—a place where statistical analysis and comedic musings coexist in an unlikely yet curiously harmonious symphony.
With the rise of AI and its integration into various facets of daily life, it seems only fitting that we explore the comedic discourse surrounding this complex subject matter. The choice of footwear, as an essential component of individual expression and comfort, serves as a tangible lens through which to examine the potential influence of AI-themed humor on consumers. It brings to mind the age-old question: If a joke about AI falls in a comic strip and no one is around to hear it, does it still impact shoe sales? Or, perhaps more pressingly, can humor about AI walk the thin line between lighthearted jest and unexpectedly driving economic trends?
Throughout history, societal trends and technological advancements have entwined in unexpected ways. The fabled "butterfly effect" of chaos theory comes to mind, reminding us that seemingly unrelated events may in fact be intricately connected. Thus, with a twinkle in our eye and a stack of xkcd archives at our disposal, we venture forth to unravel the comedy of errors that lies hidden amidst the labyrinth of consumer choices and pop cultural phenomena. It is in this spirit of inquisitiveness and lighthearted inquiry that we present our findings, with a hope that our conclusions may elicit both nods of agreement and bemused quizzical expressions from our esteemed readers.
With this backdrop in mind, we invite you to join us in our exploration of the captivating interplay between xkcd's comedic genius and the labyrinthine maze of footwear consumer behavior, for as we are about to demonstrate, the laughter that these comics provoke might just have deeper, more unexpected footprints than one might initially assume.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from the xkcd comics on artificial intelligence and US shoe store sales spanning the years 2007 to 2021 revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6142829 with an r-squared value of 0.3773435. The observed correlation was statistically significant at the 0.05 level, indicating a substantial relationship between the variables of interest. The strong positive correlation suggests that as the presence of AI-related xkcd comics increased, so did the US shoe store sales.

In Figure 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the robust correlation between the frequency of AI-themed xkcd comics and the corresponding fluctuations in US shoe store sales. Admittedly, we marveled at the unexpected cogency of this correlation, as it provided a truly eye-opening moment amidst our otherwise routine statistical analyses.

The implications of this peculiar association, though initially surprising, prompt reflection on the potential influence of humor and pop culture on consumer behavior. The findings not only underscore the multifaceted impact of AI discourse in popular media but also highlight the intricate ways in which seemingly disparate domains intersect.

It is worth noting that while the interpretation of these results is certainly intriguing, further research is warranted to elucidate the driving mechanisms underlying this correlation. To that end, the convoluted web of human behavior and its interactions with popular culture beckons for continued exploration.

In summary, our examination of xkcd comics focusing on artificial intelligence and US shoe store sales has unearthed a noteworthy correlation, inviting contemplation of the unexpectedly far-reaching influence of humor on consumer choices. These findings serve as a testament to the unanticipated connections that can be discerned through a lighthearted lens, shedding light on the colorful tapestry of human behavior and popular culture.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about artificial intelligence and US Shoe Store Sales. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Laughing Our Way to Insights: The Connection Between xkcd Comics on Artificial Intelligence and US Shoe Store Sales"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the fascinating and often overlooked relationship between xkcd comics focusing on artificial intelligence (AI) and the fluctuations in US shoe store sales. Through a meticulous and somewhat unconventional analysis using data from the xkcd archive and US shoe store sales from 2007 to 2021, we delve into the intersection of humor, technology, and consumer behavior. Our research team employed AI to scrutinize the xkcd comics, and we utilized data from Statista to capture the nuances of shoe store sales. The correlation coefficient of 0.6142829 and p < 0.05 unveiled a compelling connection that leaves us pondering whether the impact of hilarious AI-themed comics extends beyond just eliciting chuckles to potentially influencing consumer spending habits in the footwear industry. Our findings shed light on the delightful yet surprisingly meaningful correlations that exist in the most unexpected places within the vast and intricate web of human behavior and popular culture.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between seemingly disparate elements such as online comic strips and consumer behavior has been a subject of fascination and bewilderment for scholars and aficionados alike. While the exploration of this relationship may at first glance appear to be an exercise in whimsy, recent inquiries have revealed compelling insights that warrant further investigation.
Indeed, in exploring the world of xkcd comics, authored by the astute Randall Munroe, one finds a wealth of humorous, and often thought-provoking, content pertaining to artificial intelligence. In their study, "Tech Laughs: The Influence of xkcd Comics on Public Perception of AI," Smith and Doe delve into the profound impact of Munroe's comedic portrayals of AI on the collective psyche of technology enthusiasts. Their findings indicate a notable shift in the public's perception of AI, with a significant proportion attributing their newfound AI-related humor to their engagements with xkcd comics.
Furthermore, Jones et al. in "Humor in the Age of AI: A Comedic Analysis of xkcd Webcomics," expound upon the intricate nuances of humor and technological themes in various xkcd installments. Their analysis illuminates the uncanny ability of these comics to convey complex concepts in a light-hearted yet comprehensible manner, serving as a gateway to demystifying the enigmatic realm of artificial intelligence for the layperson.
Amidst these scholarly inquiries, it is imperative to acknowledge the potential dynamics between popular culture phenomena and consumer behavior, a realm in which the intersection of humor and technology may yield unexpected implications. The literature elucidates the possibility of a latent symbiosis between seemingly unrelated domains, prompting us to ponder the ramifications of these connections on the economic tapestry.
Turning to the literary world, works such as "Artificial Absurdity: Witty Musings on Technology," by Lorem Ipsum, offer a compendium of satirical writings that mirror the essence of xkcd's brand of wry humor. Although not directly addressing the intersection of AI-related humor and consumer behavior, these literary contributions provide invaluable insights into the enduring appeal of comedic reflections on modern technological phenomena.
In a departure from non-fiction literature, the imaginative realms of fiction have also proffered narratives that resonate with the thematic threads of our inquiry. For instance, "The Cyborg Chronicles," a collection of science fiction short stories by Jane Austen, explores the interplay between artificial intelligence and societal dynamics, presenting speculative scenarios that mirror the complexities inherent in technological jest.
Akin to literary explorations, animated creations such as "The Jetsons" and "Inspector Gadget" have captivated audiences with their whimsical portrayals of futuristic technologies. While not directly addressing the specific comedic lens of AI as exhibited in xkcd comics, these animated renditions offer a canvas rich with thematic resonances, encapsulating the amalgamation of technology and human foibles in a whimsical and accessible manner.
In addition to literary and animated influences, the researchers acknowledge the impact of childhood experiences, such as the fond recollection of Saturday morning cartoons, in shaping their observational acumen and humor sensibilities. Furthermore, the authors gratefully acknowledge the inspiration provided by the stalwart comedic geniuses of yesteryear, whose timeless wit continues to inform the fabric of contemporary humorous discourse.
As the investigation progresses, it is imperative to embrace the diverse array of influences that have shaped the perceptive lens through which we approach this research endeavor. With an unwavering commitment to scholarly rigor and a steadfast dedication to unraveling the complexities of human behavior, the authors aim to navigate the sinuous pathways of popular culture and consumer trends in the pursuit of scholarly elucidation and, with any fortune, the occasional chuckle.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the xkcd comics on artificial intelligence and US shoe store sales spanning the years 2007 to 2021 revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6142829 with an r-squared value of 0.3773435. The observed correlation was statistically significant at the 0.05 level, indicating a substantial relationship between the variables of interest. The strong positive correlation suggests that as the presence of AI-related xkcd comics increased, so did the US shoe store sales.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the robust correlation between the frequency of AI-themed xkcd comics and the corresponding fluctuations in US shoe store sales. Admittedly, we marveled at the unexpected cogency of this correlation, as it provided a truly eye-opening moment amidst our otherwise routine statistical analyses.
The implications of this peculiar association, though initially surprising, prompt reflection on the potential influence of humor and pop culture on consumer behavior. The findings not only underscore the multifaceted impact of AI discourse in popular media but also highlight the intricate ways in which seemingly disparate domains intersect.
It is worth noting that while the interpretation of these results is certainly intriguing, further research is warranted to elucidate the driving mechanisms underlying this correlation. To that end, the convoluted web of human behavior and its interactions with popular culture beckons for continued exploration.
In summary, our examination of xkcd comics focusing on artificial intelligence and US shoe store sales has unearthed a noteworthy correlation, inviting contemplation of the unexpectedly far-reaching influence of humor on consumer choices. These findings serve as a testament to the unanticipated connections that can be discerned through a lighthearted lens, shedding light on the colorful tapestry of human behavior and popular culture.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our research provide compelling support for the prior literature that suggested a connection between humor-based AI content and consumer behavior. In particular, our results align with the work of Smith and Doe, who emphasized the impact of xkcd comics on public perception of AI. Our study extends this line of inquiry by demonstrating that the influence of AI-related humor may potentially encompass not only shifts in public perception but also tangible effects on consumer spending behavior.

Jones et al.'s analysis of the comedic nuances in xkcd webcomics also resonates with our findings, as we, too, observed the uncanny ability of these comics to convey complex concepts in a light-hearted manner. The unexpected cogency of the correlation between the frequency of AI-themed xkcd comics and US shoe store sales points to the potential impact of humor and pop culture on consumer behavior, which aligns with the nuanced observations made in the literature review.

Moreover, the whimsical influences from literary and animated realms, as well as childhood experiences, add a layer of richness to our investigation. While it may seem inherently amusing to consider the impact of Saturday morning cartoons on scholarly acumen, our findings prompt reflection on the myriad indirect influences that shape our perceptions and sensibilities, which, in turn, may intersect with consumer choices in unanticipated ways.

The conventional wisdom that these unlikely bedfellows of AI-themed humor and shoe store sales could be linked in a statistically significant manner invites further contemplation of the underlying mechanisms at play. We must tread carefully in untangling this convoluted web of human behavior and popular culture. While our results establish the correlation, the precise causal pathways demand continued exploration.

We must not lose sight of the delightful and surprisingly meaningful correlations that emerge from the most unexpected places within the intricate web of human behavior and popular culture. This study serves as a testament to the potential impact of lighthearted content on consumer choices, and the colorful tapestry of interconnected influences that shape the economic landscape.

Ultimately, the implications of these findings extend beyond the realm of humor and technology, inviting us to reevaluate the multifaceted ways in which popular culture permeates into consumer behavior. As we resist the temptation to make light of these unexpected connections, our study opens a new avenue for scholarly exploration, challenging us to confront the delightful yet consequential intersections between seemingly disparate domains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about artificial intelligence and US Shoe Store Sales. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Laughing Our Way to Insights: The Connection Between xkcd Comics on Artificial Intelligence and US Shoe Store Sales"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the fascinating and often overlooked relationship between xkcd comics focusing on artificial intelligence (AI) and the fluctuations in US shoe store sales. Through a meticulous and somewhat unconventional analysis using data from the xkcd archive and US shoe store sales from 2007 to 2021, we delve into the intersection of humor, technology, and consumer behavior. Our research team employed AI to scrutinize the xkcd comics, and we utilized data from Statista to capture the nuances of shoe store sales. The correlation coefficient of 0.6142829 and p < 0.05 unveiled a compelling connection that leaves us pondering whether the impact of hilarious AI-themed comics extends beyond just eliciting chuckles to potentially influencing consumer spending habits in the footwear industry. Our findings shed light on the delightful yet surprisingly meaningful correlations that exist in the most unexpected places within the vast and intricate web of human behavior and popular culture.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) and consumer behavior has long been a subject of interest and bewilderment. Through the lens of humor, this study seeks to shift the focus from traditional narratives to the uncharted territory of xkcd comics. Created by Randall Munroe, these webcomics have gained a cult following for their witty, often wry commentary on technology, science, and the quirks of everyday life. And what better way to examine their influence than by investigating their potential impact on an industry as fundamental as shoe store sales?
In the realm of statistical inquiry, it is not every day that one stumbles across a correlation as peculiar and amusing as the one we have uncovered. If we may indulge in a moment of intellectual whimsy, the notion that a webcomic series featuring stick figures and astute AI jokes could be linked to the fluctuations in shoe store sales may appear initially preposterous. However, as they say, truth is often stranger than fiction.
As we embark on this empirical voyage, it is important to acknowledge the inherent unpredictability of human behavior. Individuals, much like shoe styles, come in all shapes and sizes, and unraveling the peculiarities of their spending patterns demands an interdisciplinary approach. Consequently, we sit at the intersection of humor, technology, and consumer preferences—a place where statistical analysis and comedic musings coexist in an unlikely yet curiously harmonious symphony.
With the rise of AI and its integration into various facets of daily life, it seems only fitting that we explore the comedic discourse surrounding this complex subject matter. The choice of footwear, as an essential component of individual expression and comfort, serves as a tangible lens through which to examine the potential influence of AI-themed humor on consumers. It brings to mind the age-old question: If a joke about AI falls in a comic strip and no one is around to hear it, does it still impact shoe sales? Or, perhaps more pressingly, can humor about AI walk the thin line between lighthearted jest and unexpectedly driving economic trends?
Throughout history, societal trends and technological advancements have entwined in unexpected ways. The fabled "butterfly effect" of chaos theory comes to mind, reminding us that seemingly unrelated events may in fact be intricately connected. Thus, with a twinkle in our eye and a stack of xkcd archives at our disposal, we venture forth to unravel the comedy of errors that lies hidden amidst the labyrinth of consumer choices and pop cultural phenomena. It is in this spirit of inquisitiveness and lighthearted inquiry that we present our findings, with a hope that our conclusions may elicit both nods of agreement and bemused quizzical expressions from our esteemed readers.
With this backdrop in mind, we invite you to join us in our exploration of the captivating interplay between xkcd's comedic genius and the labyrinthine maze of footwear consumer behavior, for as we are about to demonstrate, the laughter that these comics provoke might just have deeper, more unexpected footprints than one might initially assume.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the xkcd comics on artificial intelligence and US shoe store sales spanning the years 2007 to 2021 revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6142829 with an r-squared value of 0.3773435. The observed correlation was statistically significant at the 0.05 level, indicating a substantial relationship between the variables of interest. The strong positive correlation suggests that as the presence of AI-related xkcd comics increased, so did the US shoe store sales.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the robust correlation between the frequency of AI-themed xkcd comics and the corresponding fluctuations in US shoe store sales. Admittedly, we marveled at the unexpected cogency of this correlation, as it provided a truly eye-opening moment amidst our otherwise routine statistical analyses.
The implications of this peculiar association, though initially surprising, prompt reflection on the potential influence of humor and pop culture on consumer behavior. The findings not only underscore the multifaceted impact of AI discourse in popular media but also highlight the intricate ways in which seemingly disparate domains intersect.
It is worth noting that while the interpretation of these results is certainly intriguing, further research is warranted to elucidate the driving mechanisms underlying this correlation. To that end, the convoluted web of human behavior and its interactions with popular culture beckons for continued exploration.
In summary, our examination of xkcd comics focusing on artificial intelligence and US shoe store sales has unearthed a noteworthy correlation, inviting contemplation of the unexpectedly far-reaching influence of humor on consumer choices. These findings serve as a testament to the unanticipated connections that can be discerned through a lighthearted lens, shedding light on the colorful tapestry of human behavior and popular culture.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the research findings presented in this study do indeed provide a thought-provoking glimpse into the interplay of humor, technology, and consumer behavior. The robust correlation between xkcd comics centered on artificial intelligence and US shoe store sales offers an amusing yet compelling insight into the potential influence of AI-themed humor on consumers' footwear preferences. It appears that the impact of these witty webcomics extends beyond eliciting mere chuckles to potentially swaying purchasing decisions in the ever-evolving realm of shoe fashion.

The unexpected harmony between AI-related jests and footwear retail trends invites a whimsical contemplation of the intricate dance between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Much like a pair of well-crafted shoes, this correlation walks the delicate line between comfort and style, intertwining the art of humor with the science of consumer behavior.

While the statistical analysis has furnished us with intriguing results, it is important to acknowledge that correlation does not imply causation. The intricate mechanisms underpinning this delightful association remain shrouded in humorous mystique and warrant further exploration. As we delved into this uncharted territory, we were reminded that the world of statistical inquiry is not without its moments of unexpected levity and scholarly mirth.

With a metaphorical tip of the hat to both the enigmatic allure of artificial intelligence and the delightful whimsy of xkcd's comic universe, we stand at a crossroads—a juncture where data-driven insights and lighthearted musings converge. The implications of our findings prompt us to reflect on the unpredictable ripples that humor, technology, and consumer choices create in the vast ocean of human behavior.

In the spirit of intellectual curiosity and scholarly amusement, we propose that this study marks a delightful footnote in the annals of research, illuminating the multifaceted tapestry of human conduct and cultural influences. As we bid farewell to this captivating exploration, we contend that the laughter induced by AI-themed comics may indeed leave indelible footprints on the landscape of consumer preferences, an observation that one might aptly label a "jocular paradox."

In the grand tradition of academic inquiry, we assert that our findings not only shine a playful spotlight on the interconnectedness of humor and consumer habits but also inspire a lighthearted appreciation for the quirkiness of statistical phenomena. With a nod to the enduring charm of xkcd and the enduring allure of stylish footwear, we declare with a touch of scholarly whimsy that no further research in this area is warranted. For as we have shown, sometimes the most unexpected correlations are the ones that bring a delightful smile to our faces.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Laughing Our Way to Insights: The Connection Between xkcd Comics on Artificial Intelligence and US Shoe Store Sales. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Witty Research Insights


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Laughing Our Way to Insights: The Connection Between xkcd Comics on Artificial Intelligence and US Shoe Store Sales. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Witty Wisdom Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Laughing Our Way to Insights: The Connection Between xkcd Comics on Artificial Intelligence and US Shoe Store Sales with an abstract of This paper explores the fascinating and often overlooked relationship between xkcd comics focusing on artificial intelligence (AI) and the fluctuations in US shoe store sales. Through a meticulous and somewhat unconventional analysis using data from the xkcd archive and US shoe store sales from 2007 to 2021, we delve into the intersection of humor, technology, and consumer behavior. Our research team employed AI to scrutinize the xkcd comics, and we utilized data from Statista to capture the nuances of shoe store sales. The correlation coefficient of 0.6142829 and p < 0.05 unveiled a compelling connection that leaves us pondering whether the impact of hilarious AI-themed comics extends beyond just eliciting chuckles to potentially influencing consumer spending habits in the footwear industry. Our findings shed light on the delightful yet surprisingly meaningful correlations that exist in the most unexpected places within the vast and intricate web of human behavior and popular culture.

ChatGPT:

xkcd comics artificial intelligence, US shoe store sales, relationship, humor technology, consumer behavior, xkcd archive data, US shoe store sales data, correlation coefficient, impact of comics on consumer spending behavior, AI-themed comics, consumer spending habits footwear industry, correlations between human behavior and popular culture

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

xkcd comics published about artificial intelligence
Detailed data title: The number of xkcd comics published each year about artificial intelligence
Source: AI analysis of xkcd comics
Additional Info: I designed a Python workflow to perform OCR on every xkcd comic, feed that text into a large language model, and ask the model whether this comic was about the category named in the title.

See what else correlates with xkcd comics published about artificial intelligence

US Shoe Store Sales
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with US Shoe Store Sales

Correlation r = 0.6142829 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.3773435 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 37.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., US Shoe Store Sales) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., xkcd comics published about artificial intelligence) over the 15 years from 2007 through 2021.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.015. 0.0148345415501558040000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.61 in 1.5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 67 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.15, 0.86 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
xkcd comics published about artificial intelligence (xkcd comics)123122231533314
US Shoe Store Sales (Dollars)268100000000002669000000000025070000000000263700000000002807000000000029510000000000298800000000003396000000000035310000000000369200000000003633000000000037200000000000376300000000002964000000000039150000000000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1,2,3,1,2,2,2,3,1,5,3,3,3,1,4,])
array_2 = np.array([26810000000000,26690000000000,25070000000000,26370000000000,28070000000000,29510000000000,29880000000000,33960000000000,35310000000000,36920000000000,36330000000000,37200000000000,37630000000000,29640000000000,39150000000000,])
array_1_name = "xkcd comics published about artificial intelligence"
array_2_name = "US Shoe Store Sales"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 1565 · Black Variable ID: 20034 · Red Variable ID: 145
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0