about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,559 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in soybeans in Arkansas and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to hide a body'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As GMO soybean production rose, it led to larger and more robust plants. This inadvertently created the perfect hiding spots for those looking to bury something. You could say the soybeans really knew how to "stalk" their prey, making it "bean" so much easier to cover up any foul play. And that's how we have a case of leguminous concealment on our hands!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] Show a farmer in Arkansas walking through a vast field of lush, green soybean plants, with some of them featuring large genetically modified traits. Looming in the background and slightly blurred, a person sits at a computer, frantically typing "how to hide a body" into the Google search bar. Ensure details such as the farmer's rugged work attire, the sprawling field with varying heights of soybean plants, and the intense focus in the person's eyes at the computer. The lighting should capture the warm, late afternoon glow of the field and the cool, sterile glow of the computer screen. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in soybeans in Arkansas and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute cartoon Low poly A photo-realistic image inspired by bauhaus Brutalism
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in soybeans in Arkansas and Google searches for 'how to hide a body' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A farmer in Arkansas walks through a vast field of soybean plants, some of which are genetically modified. Meanwhile, someone sits at a computer, frantically typing "how to hide a body" into the Google search bar.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: A farmer in Arkansas walks through a vast field of soybean plants, some of which are genetically modified. Meanwhile, someone sits at a computer, frantically typing "how to hide a body" into the Google search bar. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A photo-realistic image ] Show a farmer in Arkansas walking through a vast field of lush, green soybean plants, with some of them featuring large genetically modified traits. Looming in the background and slightly blurred, a person sits at a computer, frantically typing "how to hide a body" into the Google search bar. Ensure details such as the farmer's rugged work attire, the sprawling field with varying heights of soybean plants, and the intense focus in the person's eyes at the computer. The lighting should capture the warm, late afternoon glow of the field and the cool, sterile glow of the computer screen.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in soybeans in Arkansas caused how to hide a body (Google searches for 'how to hide a body') to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Soybean Surge: Unearthing the Connection Between GMOs and Googling 'How to Hide a Body'

The Journal of Agricultural Anomalies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Arkansas and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8633205 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Soybean Surge: Unearthing the Connection Between GMOs and Googling 'How to Hide a Body'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking research, we delve into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Arkansas and the surge in Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8633205 with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2022. While many may find it soy outlandish, our findings suggest a potential link between the adoption of GMO soybeans and a peculiar curiosity about concealing bodies. We seed to explore the possibility of unintended consequences of GMO usage, peeling back the layers of this mystery to unearth the root of this unexpected association. Our research aims to highlight the importance of considering the broader societal implications of agricultural practices and the blooming interest in quirky search queries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Arkansas and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Soybean Surge: Unearthing the Connection Between GMOs and Googling 'How to Hide a Body'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking research, we delve into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Arkansas and the surge in Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8633205 with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2022. While many may find it soy outlandish, our findings suggest a potential link between the adoption of GMO soybeans and a peculiar curiosity about concealing bodies. We seed to explore the possibility of unintended consequences of GMO usage, peeling back the layers of this mystery to unearth the root of this unexpected association. Our research aims to highlight the importance of considering the broader societal implications of agricultural practices and the blooming interest in quirky search queries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

What do genetically modified soybeans and a macabre search query have in common? If you guessed "absolutely nothing", well, you're in for a surprise! In this unprecedented study, we aim to unravel the perplexing link between GMO soybeans in Arkansas and the peculiar surge in Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. While it may seem like a stretch, our investigation sprouted from a seed of curiosity and has blossomed into a compelling exploration of the unexpected intersections of agriculture and eerie online inquiries.

It's no secret that genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a hot topic in the agricultural world. The introduction of GMO soybeans promised improved yields, resistance to pests, and smoother operational processes for farmers, yet our research suggests that there may be a more, ahem, buried layer to this story. As we tilled through the data, we unearthed a surprising correlation between the adoption of GMO soybeans and the uptick in searches related to covert body concealment. The implications of this correlation are not to be buried lightly, and we are determined to dig deep into this enigmatic phenomenon.

What sets our study apart is its organic blend of statistical rigor and the cultivation of levity in addressing a morbidly curious trend. We aim to cultivate an understanding of the possible psychological, sociological, and agricultural underpinnings of this correlation without wilting in the face of the macabre subject matter. So, buckle up and get ready for a wild ride through the fields of genetics, internet culture, and the unexpected twists of correlation that leave us wondering if there's more to GMOs than meets the eye. It's a-maize-ing what we might uncover!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Arkansas and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Soybean Surge: Unearthing the Connection Between GMOs and Googling 'How to Hide a Body'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking research, we delve into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Arkansas and the surge in Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8633205 with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2022. While many may find it soy outlandish, our findings suggest a potential link between the adoption of GMO soybeans and a peculiar curiosity about concealing bodies. We seed to explore the possibility of unintended consequences of GMO usage, peeling back the layers of this mystery to unearth the root of this unexpected association. Our research aims to highlight the importance of considering the broader societal implications of agricultural practices and the blooming interest in quirky search queries.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
What do genetically modified soybeans and a macabre search query have in common? If you guessed "absolutely nothing", well, you're in for a surprise! In this unprecedented study, we aim to unravel the perplexing link between GMO soybeans in Arkansas and the peculiar surge in Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. While it may seem like a stretch, our investigation sprouted from a seed of curiosity and has blossomed into a compelling exploration of the unexpected intersections of agriculture and eerie online inquiries.
It's no secret that genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a hot topic in the agricultural world. The introduction of GMO soybeans promised improved yields, resistance to pests, and smoother operational processes for farmers, yet our research suggests that there may be a more, ahem, buried layer to this story. As we tilled through the data, we unearthed a surprising correlation between the adoption of GMO soybeans and the uptick in searches related to covert body concealment. The implications of this correlation are not to be buried lightly, and we are determined to dig deep into this enigmatic phenomenon.
What sets our study apart is its organic blend of statistical rigor and the cultivation of levity in addressing a morbidly curious trend. We aim to cultivate an understanding of the possible psychological, sociological, and agricultural underpinnings of this correlation without wilting in the face of the macabre subject matter. So, buckle up and get ready for a wild ride through the fields of genetics, internet culture, and the unexpected twists of correlation that leave us wondering if there's more to GMOs than meets the eye. It's a-maize-ing what we might uncover!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2010) conducted a comprehensive analysis of GMO usage in soybean cultivation and its implications on agricultural practices. Their research provided a foundation for understanding the adoption and impact of genetically modified soybeans, shedding light on the potential benefits and concerns associated with these agricultural innovations. However, our investigation plunges into uncharted territory, where we unearth a correlation that may have eluded previous scholarly endeavors.

Building on the groundwork laid by Jones et al. (2015), who discussed the societal implications of GMO adoption in the context of consumer attitudes and market dynamics, our research seeks to branch out into unconventional territories. As we navigate through the maze of data, we stumble upon a peculiar trend that beckons us to explore beyond the confines of traditional agricultural discourse.

Turning to non-fiction literature, "GMOs and You: Navigating the Terrain of Genetically Modified Crops" by Dr. Green is a notable resource offering a comprehensive overview of GMOs and their impact on the agricultural landscape. While its focus is primarily on the technical aspects of genetic modification, the book inadvertently sows the seeds of curiosity, leaving room for unconventional interpretations of its findings. On the other hand, "The Curious Case of Curbing Cravings" by Dr. Munch explores the psychology of unusual search queries, providing insights into the enigmatic nature of human curiosity and its digital manifestations.

Delving into the realm of fiction, the works of Agatha Christie, particularly "Murder on the Orient Express", may initially seem tangential to our research theme. However, the intricacies of clandestine activities and the art of concealment examined in Christie's novels lay the groundwork for a whimsical exploration of the broader cultural fascination with covert behavior. Additionally, the dystopian world depicted in "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley offers a speculative landscape in which genetically modified entities play a central role, resonating with our own inquiries into the unforeseen consequences of scientific interventions.

In a bold departure from conventional research methods, we must confess that our quest for relevant literature extended into unorthodox territories. While it may raise a few eyebrows, we cannot ignore the valuable insights gleaned from unexpected sources. From analyzing the cryptic messages on cereal boxes to deciphering the hidden truths behind the blurbs of shampoo bottles, our pursuit of understanding led us down whimsical rabbit holes that, strangely enough, contributed to our unconventional approach to this inquiry.

As we harvest the fruits of our literary reconnaissance, we embark on a journey that promises to unravel the ties between GMO soybeans and Google's bemusing search inquiries. In the spirit of scholarly inquiry and a pinch of whimsy, we plow through the fields of knowledge, eager to reap the bounty of insights that await us. Stay tuned for a cornucopia of findings that may just have you exclaiming, "Soy glad I stumbled upon this study!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Arkansas and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Soybean Surge: Unearthing the Connection Between GMOs and Googling 'How to Hide a Body'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking research, we delve into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Arkansas and the surge in Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8633205 with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2022. While many may find it soy outlandish, our findings suggest a potential link between the adoption of GMO soybeans and a peculiar curiosity about concealing bodies. We seed to explore the possibility of unintended consequences of GMO usage, peeling back the layers of this mystery to unearth the root of this unexpected association. Our research aims to highlight the importance of considering the broader societal implications of agricultural practices and the blooming interest in quirky search queries.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
What do genetically modified soybeans and a macabre search query have in common? If you guessed "absolutely nothing", well, you're in for a surprise! In this unprecedented study, we aim to unravel the perplexing link between GMO soybeans in Arkansas and the peculiar surge in Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. While it may seem like a stretch, our investigation sprouted from a seed of curiosity and has blossomed into a compelling exploration of the unexpected intersections of agriculture and eerie online inquiries.
It's no secret that genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a hot topic in the agricultural world. The introduction of GMO soybeans promised improved yields, resistance to pests, and smoother operational processes for farmers, yet our research suggests that there may be a more, ahem, buried layer to this story. As we tilled through the data, we unearthed a surprising correlation between the adoption of GMO soybeans and the uptick in searches related to covert body concealment. The implications of this correlation are not to be buried lightly, and we are determined to dig deep into this enigmatic phenomenon.
What sets our study apart is its organic blend of statistical rigor and the cultivation of levity in addressing a morbidly curious trend. We aim to cultivate an understanding of the possible psychological, sociological, and agricultural underpinnings of this correlation without wilting in the face of the macabre subject matter. So, buckle up and get ready for a wild ride through the fields of genetics, internet culture, and the unexpected twists of correlation that leave us wondering if there's more to GMOs than meets the eye. It's a-maize-ing what we might uncover!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To bean our investigation, we harvested data from various sources across the internet, conducting a systematic and comprehensive search to dig up relevant information. Our primary sources of data included the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for soybean cultivation, genetic modification adoption, and agricultural trends, while we turned to Google Trends to plow through the search data for 'how to hide a body' within the timeframe of 2004 to 2022. As the saying goes, we wanted to ensure we were planting our research seeds in fertile soil.

To germinate our analysis, we developed a meticulous and multifaceted approach to untangle the intertwined roots of GMO soybean usage and the surge in peculiar Google searches. This involved employing statistical methods, such as correlation analysis and linear regression, to peel back the layers and weed out any spurious relationships. We also sought to harvest information on societal and psychological trends through qualitative interviews and online forums to glean insights into the potential motivations behind such unconventional search behavior.

Our research team, comprised of seasoned agricultural analysts and curious minds, carefully curated the data with a satirical eye, ensuring that we didn't miss any potential budding patterns or nuanced nuances within the datasets. With our ears to the ground, we listened for any whispers of correlation, prepared to weed out any false leads to ensure our analysis was rooted in robust empirical evidence.

In addition to quantitative and qualitative methods, we also delved into the realm of natural language processing to plow through the textual content of search queries, aiming to sieve out recurring themes and nuances in the language used within the context of our investigation. This allowed us to sift through the digital haystack in search of the proverbial needle, attempting to gain a deeper understanding of the underlying motivations behind such unconventional searches without getting lost in the corn maze of internet data.

To fertilize our findings with a dose of cross-disciplinary perspective, we engaged in interdisciplinary discussions with experts in psychology, criminology, and agricultural science to uncover potential explanations for the observed correlation, embracing a collaborative approach to cultivate a more holistic understanding of the phenomenon. This approach ensured that our analysis didn't become just another statistical weed in the garden of research, but rather flourished into a captivating blend of quantitative analysis, qualitative insights, and interdisciplinary perspectives, ensuring that we didn't merely scratch the surface of this enigmatic correlation.

Once the data was gathered, we carefully sowed the seeds of statistical analysis, nurturing the data with analytical tools to unearth the underlying relationships and, hopefully, cut through the crop of false correlations to reveal the true blooms of our investigation. The process involved rigorous hypothesis testing, sensitivity analyses, and model validation to ensure that our findings sprouted from robust statistical evidence rather than a wild growth of spurious relationships.

We acknowledge that the nature of our investigation may seem unconventional, but we assure the reader that our approach was a labor of love, nurturing every aspect of the analysis with the precision of a seasoned gardener. Our methodology aimed to weed out any biases, cultivate sound analytical practices, and ultimately harvest a crop of findings that could shed light on the unexpected connection between GMO soybeans and the curious curiosity about body concealment. Our intent was not to merely plant the seeds of curiosity but to cultivate a bountiful harvest of insightful findings, rooted in empirical evidence and interdisciplinary perspectives.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Arkansas and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8633205, r-squared of 0.7453223, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Soybean Surge: Unearthing the Connection Between GMOs and Googling 'How to Hide a Body'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking research, we delve into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Arkansas and the surge in Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8633205 with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2022. While many may find it soy outlandish, our findings suggest a potential link between the adoption of GMO soybeans and a peculiar curiosity about concealing bodies. We seed to explore the possibility of unintended consequences of GMO usage, peeling back the layers of this mystery to unearth the root of this unexpected association. Our research aims to highlight the importance of considering the broader societal implications of agricultural practices and the blooming interest in quirky search queries.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
What do genetically modified soybeans and a macabre search query have in common? If you guessed "absolutely nothing", well, you're in for a surprise! In this unprecedented study, we aim to unravel the perplexing link between GMO soybeans in Arkansas and the peculiar surge in Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. While it may seem like a stretch, our investigation sprouted from a seed of curiosity and has blossomed into a compelling exploration of the unexpected intersections of agriculture and eerie online inquiries.
It's no secret that genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a hot topic in the agricultural world. The introduction of GMO soybeans promised improved yields, resistance to pests, and smoother operational processes for farmers, yet our research suggests that there may be a more, ahem, buried layer to this story. As we tilled through the data, we unearthed a surprising correlation between the adoption of GMO soybeans and the uptick in searches related to covert body concealment. The implications of this correlation are not to be buried lightly, and we are determined to dig deep into this enigmatic phenomenon.
What sets our study apart is its organic blend of statistical rigor and the cultivation of levity in addressing a morbidly curious trend. We aim to cultivate an understanding of the possible psychological, sociological, and agricultural underpinnings of this correlation without wilting in the face of the macabre subject matter. So, buckle up and get ready for a wild ride through the fields of genetics, internet culture, and the unexpected twists of correlation that leave us wondering if there's more to GMOs than meets the eye. It's a-maize-ing what we might uncover!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data from our study harvested a correlation coefficient of 0.8633205, an r-squared value of 0.7453223, and a p-value less than 0.01, all pointing to a statistically significant relationship between the use of GMO soybeans in Arkansas and the astonishing increase in Google searches for 'how to hide a body' from 2004 to 2022. It's as clear as day – there's more to this correlation than meets the aye!

In Figure 1, the scatterplot visually captures the robust correlation between GMO soybean adoption and the surge in searches for unconventional concealment methods. The scatterplot looks like a field filled with soybeans, except instead of soybeans, it's scattered data points that make you raise an eyebrow and wonder what's really going on here. The line of best fit sprouts from the data points like a stalk growing out of the ground, illustrating the strong association between these seemingly unrelated variables. You might say we've sown the seeds of an unexpected discovery here.

When we stumbled upon this correlation, we didn't want to jump to any rash conclusions. We're not going to soy "case closed" just yet because there's still a lot to bean uncovering here. However, this discovery does open a can of worms – or should we say a can of soybeans? – and prompts further investigation into the potential implications of GMO soybean usage on the collective consciousness of internet users and the societal fascination with concealing cadavers.

Our results aren't just food for thought; they're a whole meal deal, serving up a heaping portion of curiosity and questions about the impact of agricultural practices on the public's morbid fascinations. It seems like we've unearthed a mystery that's more than just genetically modified – it's genetically mystifying!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Arkansas and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Soybean Surge: Unearthing the Connection Between GMOs and Googling 'How to Hide a Body'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking research, we delve into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Arkansas and the surge in Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8633205 with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2022. While many may find it soy outlandish, our findings suggest a potential link between the adoption of GMO soybeans and a peculiar curiosity about concealing bodies. We seed to explore the possibility of unintended consequences of GMO usage, peeling back the layers of this mystery to unearth the root of this unexpected association. Our research aims to highlight the importance of considering the broader societal implications of agricultural practices and the blooming interest in quirky search queries.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2010) conducted a comprehensive analysis of GMO usage in soybean cultivation and its implications on agricultural practices. Their research provided a foundation for understanding the adoption and impact of genetically modified soybeans, shedding light on the potential benefits and concerns associated with these agricultural innovations. However, our investigation plunges into uncharted territory, where we unearth a correlation that may have eluded previous scholarly endeavors.
Building on the groundwork laid by Jones et al. (2015), who discussed the societal implications of GMO adoption in the context of consumer attitudes and market dynamics, our research seeks to branch out into unconventional territories. As we navigate through the maze of data, we stumble upon a peculiar trend that beckons us to explore beyond the confines of traditional agricultural discourse.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "GMOs and You: Navigating the Terrain of Genetically Modified Crops" by Dr. Green is a notable resource offering a comprehensive overview of GMOs and their impact on the agricultural landscape. While its focus is primarily on the technical aspects of genetic modification, the book inadvertently sows the seeds of curiosity, leaving room for unconventional interpretations of its findings. On the other hand, "The Curious Case of Curbing Cravings" by Dr. Munch explores the psychology of unusual search queries, providing insights into the enigmatic nature of human curiosity and its digital manifestations.
Delving into the realm of fiction, the works of Agatha Christie, particularly "Murder on the Orient Express", may initially seem tangential to our research theme. However, the intricacies of clandestine activities and the art of concealment examined in Christie's novels lay the groundwork for a whimsical exploration of the broader cultural fascination with covert behavior. Additionally, the dystopian world depicted in "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley offers a speculative landscape in which genetically modified entities play a central role, resonating with our own inquiries into the unforeseen consequences of scientific interventions.
In a bold departure from conventional research methods, we must confess that our quest for relevant literature extended into unorthodox territories. While it may raise a few eyebrows, we cannot ignore the valuable insights gleaned from unexpected sources. From analyzing the cryptic messages on cereal boxes to deciphering the hidden truths behind the blurbs of shampoo bottles, our pursuit of understanding led us down whimsical rabbit holes that, strangely enough, contributed to our unconventional approach to this inquiry.
As we harvest the fruits of our literary reconnaissance, we embark on a journey that promises to unravel the ties between GMO soybeans and Google's bemusing search inquiries. In the spirit of scholarly inquiry and a pinch of whimsy, we plow through the fields of knowledge, eager to reap the bounty of insights that await us. Stay tuned for a cornucopia of findings that may just have you exclaiming, "Soy glad I stumbled upon this study!"

[[RESULTS]]
The data from our study harvested a correlation coefficient of 0.8633205, an r-squared value of 0.7453223, and a p-value less than 0.01, all pointing to a statistically significant relationship between the use of GMO soybeans in Arkansas and the astonishing increase in Google searches for 'how to hide a body' from 2004 to 2022. It's as clear as day – there's more to this correlation than meets the aye!
In Figure 1, the scatterplot visually captures the robust correlation between GMO soybean adoption and the surge in searches for unconventional concealment methods. The scatterplot looks like a field filled with soybeans, except instead of soybeans, it's scattered data points that make you raise an eyebrow and wonder what's really going on here. The line of best fit sprouts from the data points like a stalk growing out of the ground, illustrating the strong association between these seemingly unrelated variables. You might say we've sown the seeds of an unexpected discovery here.
When we stumbled upon this correlation, we didn't want to jump to any rash conclusions. We're not going to soy "case closed" just yet because there's still a lot to bean uncovering here. However, this discovery does open a can of worms – or should we say a can of soybeans? – and prompts further investigation into the potential implications of GMO soybean usage on the collective consciousness of internet users and the societal fascination with concealing cadavers.
Our results aren't just food for thought; they're a whole meal deal, serving up a heaping portion of curiosity and questions about the impact of agricultural practices on the public's morbid fascinations. It seems like we've unearthed a mystery that's more than just genetically modified – it's genetically mystifying!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Well, talk about a soy-cially unexpected turn of events! Our findings appear to sprout from the seeds planted by previous research, germinating an intriguing connection between GMO soybean usage and the uptick in morbid Google searches. It looks like the stakes are high in this cross-pollination of agricultural practices and digital curiosity.

Building on the works of Smith and Doe (2010) and Jones et al. (2015), our study pulls a twist straight out of an Agatha Christie novel, unraveling a correlation that might have remained buried in the fields of GMO research. This result certainly raises eyebrows higher than a soybean plant in the summertime. The line of best fit in our scatterplot seems to shoot up like a genetically modified super plant, hinting at a strong association between soybeans and sinister search queries.

In the literary review, we playfully mused about the unlikely influence of novels and cereal boxes on our research, but it seems that truth is indeed stranger than fiction. The fictive worlds of Agatha Christie and Aldous Huxley might have more to do with our findings than we initially imagined. Who would have thought that the ethically murky world of "Brave New World" could intersect with our investigation into the unintended consequences of agricultural technology?

Our results take the age-old adage "you are what you eat" to a whole new level. Maybe it's not just the soybeans that are genetically modified; perhaps our online queries are also picking up some unexpected environmental cues. This study may not have cracked the case wide open, but it certainly raises questions that could fill a whole library.

On a chirpier note, our research highlights the whimsical yet thought-provoking nature of scholarly inquiry. From plowing through reams of data and literature to sowing the seeds of curiosity, this study has blossomed into a ripe debate. So, the next time you munch on a soy snack or type an innocent search query, remember that the tendrils of modern agriculture might be shaping our digital musings in unforeseen ways. Keep your eyes peeled, or should we say soy-brows raised, for the next installment in this peculiar saga.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Arkansas and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Soybean Surge: Unearthing the Connection Between GMOs and Googling 'How to Hide a Body'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking research, we delve into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Arkansas and the surge in Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8633205 with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2022. While many may find it soy outlandish, our findings suggest a potential link between the adoption of GMO soybeans and a peculiar curiosity about concealing bodies. We seed to explore the possibility of unintended consequences of GMO usage, peeling back the layers of this mystery to unearth the root of this unexpected association. Our research aims to highlight the importance of considering the broader societal implications of agricultural practices and the blooming interest in quirky search queries.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
What do genetically modified soybeans and a macabre search query have in common? If you guessed "absolutely nothing", well, you're in for a surprise! In this unprecedented study, we aim to unravel the perplexing link between GMO soybeans in Arkansas and the peculiar surge in Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. While it may seem like a stretch, our investigation sprouted from a seed of curiosity and has blossomed into a compelling exploration of the unexpected intersections of agriculture and eerie online inquiries.
It's no secret that genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a hot topic in the agricultural world. The introduction of GMO soybeans promised improved yields, resistance to pests, and smoother operational processes for farmers, yet our research suggests that there may be a more, ahem, buried layer to this story. As we tilled through the data, we unearthed a surprising correlation between the adoption of GMO soybeans and the uptick in searches related to covert body concealment. The implications of this correlation are not to be buried lightly, and we are determined to dig deep into this enigmatic phenomenon.
What sets our study apart is its organic blend of statistical rigor and the cultivation of levity in addressing a morbidly curious trend. We aim to cultivate an understanding of the possible psychological, sociological, and agricultural underpinnings of this correlation without wilting in the face of the macabre subject matter. So, buckle up and get ready for a wild ride through the fields of genetics, internet culture, and the unexpected twists of correlation that leave us wondering if there's more to GMOs than meets the eye. It's a-maize-ing what we might uncover!

[[RESULTS]]
The data from our study harvested a correlation coefficient of 0.8633205, an r-squared value of 0.7453223, and a p-value less than 0.01, all pointing to a statistically significant relationship between the use of GMO soybeans in Arkansas and the astonishing increase in Google searches for 'how to hide a body' from 2004 to 2022. It's as clear as day – there's more to this correlation than meets the aye!
In Figure 1, the scatterplot visually captures the robust correlation between GMO soybean adoption and the surge in searches for unconventional concealment methods. The scatterplot looks like a field filled with soybeans, except instead of soybeans, it's scattered data points that make you raise an eyebrow and wonder what's really going on here. The line of best fit sprouts from the data points like a stalk growing out of the ground, illustrating the strong association between these seemingly unrelated variables. You might say we've sown the seeds of an unexpected discovery here.
When we stumbled upon this correlation, we didn't want to jump to any rash conclusions. We're not going to soy "case closed" just yet because there's still a lot to bean uncovering here. However, this discovery does open a can of worms – or should we say a can of soybeans? – and prompts further investigation into the potential implications of GMO soybean usage on the collective consciousness of internet users and the societal fascination with concealing cadavers.
Our results aren't just food for thought; they're a whole meal deal, serving up a heaping portion of curiosity and questions about the impact of agricultural practices on the public's morbid fascinations. It seems like we've unearthed a mystery that's more than just genetically modified – it's genetically mystifying!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a cornucopia of intriguing findings, shedding light on the unexpected correlation between the adoption of GMO soybeans in Arkansas and the surge in Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. It's safe to say that we've cracked the case wide open, or should we say, "bean" cracked it open? Our results have soy much to offer in terms of sparking further investigation and cultivating a deeper understanding of the tangled web we've unraveled.

It's not every day that one stumbles upon a correlation as un-bean-lievable as this – a link between agricultural practices and an interest in clandestine body concealment! Our findings have certainly raised some eyebrows and left us pondering the far-reaching implications of GMO soybean usage, both on the land and in the realm of internet curiosity. It's a mystery that leaves us soy intrigued, with a sprinkling of bewilderment and a dash of "wait, what?"

As we wrap up this study, we must resist the temptation to plant more seeds of doubt or to go down the same rabbit hole – or should we say soybean hole? – to find additional correlations. It's time to put this curiosity to bed, or should we say to bury it deep in the ground, because let's face it, we've already struck gold with our unearthed findings. There's no need to dig any deeper into this particular patch of soil because, quite frankly, we think we've hit pay dirt.

So, let's call it a day and celebrate the harvest of our research. The connection between GMO soybeans and searches for body concealment might be strange, but it's certainly not something we can sweep under the rug – or in this case, under the soybean plants. We've achieved our goal of peeling back the layers of this enigmatic correlation, and it's time to cultivate new fields of inquiry.

In the words of the great philosopher (and potential soybean enthusiast) Plato, "Wise men speak because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something." And in this case, we're wise enough to know that we've said plenty about this tantalizing correlation. There's no need for further research – we're not going to soy "bean" there, done that.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Soybean Surge: Unearthing the Connection Between GMOs and Googling 'How to Hide a Body'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Anomalies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Soybean Surge: Unearthing the Connection Between GMOs and Googling 'How to Hide a Body'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agricultural Advancements and Bioethics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Soybean Surge: Unearthing the Connection Between GMOs and Googling 'How to Hide a Body' with an abstract of In this groundbreaking research, we delve into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Arkansas and the surge in Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8633205 with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2022. While many may find it soy outlandish, our findings suggest a potential link between the adoption of GMO soybeans and a peculiar curiosity about concealing bodies. We seed to explore the possibility of unintended consequences of GMO usage, peeling back the layers of this mystery to unearth the root of this unexpected association. Our research aims to highlight the importance of considering the broader societal implications of agricultural practices and the blooming interest in quirky search queries.

ChatGPT:

GMO soybeans, genetic modification, soybean farming, Google searches, correlation, unintended consequences, agricultural practices, USDA data, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, p-value, societal implications, search queries, Arkansas agriculture

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in soybeans in Arkansas
Detailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in Arkansas that are genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in Arkansas

Google searches for 'how to hide a body'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to hide a body' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to hide a body'

Correlation r = 0.8633205 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7453223 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 74.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to hide a body') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in Arkansas) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.9E-6. 0.0000019389375638531762000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.00019% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 515,746 random variables You don't actually need 515 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.67, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in soybeans in Arkansas (GMO soybeans %)92929292949496959497999796979796969898
Google searches for 'how to hide a body' (Rel. search volume)9.56.333336.583338.2515.7515.583316.2530.166751.416754.08338370.583343.666738.7536.416741.333356.583375.2572.25




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([92,92,92,92,94,94,96,95,94,97,99,97,96,97,97,96,96,98,98,])
array_2 = np.array([9.5,6.33333,6.58333,8.25,15.75,15.5833,16.25,30.1667,51.4167,54.0833,83,70.5833,43.6667,38.75,36.4167,41.3333,56.5833,75.25,72.25,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in soybeans in Arkansas"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to hide a body'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 1559 · Black Variable ID: 813 · Red Variable ID: 1513
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0