about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,510 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Wendy and the second variable is Air pollution in Miami.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the name Wendy fell out of favor, there were fewer hurricanes in the region, leading to cleaner air in Miami. It seems Wendy's name was no longer creating a whirlwind of pollution!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a crowded park in Miami where children play amongst futuristic playground equipment, as the character Wendy stands out among a group of friends. Enhance the smoggy and heavy air by depicting a sci-fi fantasy element of swirling, neon-colored mist that engulfs the background, partially obscuring the outline of downtown Miami. Add a touch of otherworldly glow to the scene, combining the joyous play of the children with the eerie and unhealthy air quality of the environment. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Wendy and Unhealthy air quality in Miami. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A black-and-white newspaper illustration Cubism Scalar art Sci-fi fantacy Brutalism
ChatGPT: Unhealthy air quality in Miami: Sci-fi fantacy

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Wendy and Unhealthy air quality in Miami together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a crowded park in Miami, a group of children play on swings, slides, and monkey bars. Among them, a girl named Wendy stands out, surrounded by a group of friends who are laughing and having a good time. However, in the background, the air appears hazy and heavy, with the outline of downtown Miami barely visible through the thick smog.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Unhealthy air quality in Miami: Sci-fi fantacy ] and depicting this scene: In a crowded park in Miami, a group of children play on swings, slides, and monkey bars. Among them, a girl named Wendy stands out, surrounded by a group of friends who are laughing and having a good time. However, in the background, the air appears hazy and heavy, with the outline of downtown Miami barely visible through the thick smog. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a crowded park in Miami where children play amongst futuristic playground equipment, as the character Wendy stands out among a group of friends. Enhance the smoggy and heavy air by depicting a sci-fi fantasy element of swirling, neon-colored mist that engulfs the background, partially obscuring the outline of downtown Miami. Add a touch of otherworldly glow to the scene, combining the joyous play of the children with the eerie and unhealthy air quality of the environment.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Wendy caused Air pollution in Miami to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Wending Through the Polluted Air: The Unlikely Link Between Wendy's Popularity and Air Quality in Miami

The Journal of Fast Food and Environmental Science

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Wendy and Air pollution in Miami. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8926439 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Wending Through the Polluted Air: The Unlikely Link Between Wendy's Popularity and Air Quality in Miami

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study delves into the unexpected connection between the prevalence of the first name Wendy and air pollution levels in Miami. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a whimsical journey to investigate this seemingly whimsical correlation. Utilizing robust statistical analyses, including a correlation coefficient of 0.8926439 and p < 0.01, our findings reveal a startling association between the popularity of the name Wendy and air pollution levels from 1980 to 2022.

As our data unfolded like a refreshing gust of wind, we found a strong positive relationship between the rise in Wendy's popularity and the increase in air pollutants in Miami. It seems that while the name Wendy soared to new heights, so did the presence of harmful pollutants in the city's air. Our results raised the question: is this simply a peculiar coincidence, or is there truly a "Wendy effect" at play in shaping Miami's environmental landscape?

In this quest for knowledge, one cannot help but ponder: what's in a name? As we humorously sifted through the data, we couldn't help but think "Wendy's popularity sure has caused quite a stir, both figuratively and literally!" Despite the lighthearted nature of our investigation, the substantial statistical evidence encourages further exploration into the unconventional relationship between nomenclature and environmental phenomena.

In the end, as our findings blew us away, it becomes evident that behind every statistical model lies a story waiting to be uncovered—a story that may just lead us to appreciate the unexpected ways in which names and air pollution intertwine. With a chuckle and a sigh, we bid adieu until the next inquiry arises, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the quirks of scientific exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Wendy and Air pollution in Miami. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wending Through the Polluted Air: The Unlikely Link Between Wendy's Popularity and Air Quality in Miami

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study delves into the unexpected connection between the prevalence of the first name Wendy and air pollution levels in Miami. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a whimsical journey to investigate this seemingly whimsical correlation. Utilizing robust statistical analyses, including a correlation coefficient of 0.8926439 and p < 0.01, our findings reveal a startling association between the popularity of the name Wendy and air pollution levels from 1980 to 2022.

As our data unfolded like a refreshing gust of wind, we found a strong positive relationship between the rise in Wendy's popularity and the increase in air pollutants in Miami. It seems that while the name Wendy soared to new heights, so did the presence of harmful pollutants in the city's air. Our results raised the question: is this simply a peculiar coincidence, or is there truly a "Wendy effect" at play in shaping Miami's environmental landscape?

In this quest for knowledge, one cannot help but ponder: what's in a name? As we humorously sifted through the data, we couldn't help but think "Wendy's popularity sure has caused quite a stir, both figuratively and literally!" Despite the lighthearted nature of our investigation, the substantial statistical evidence encourages further exploration into the unconventional relationship between nomenclature and environmental phenomena.

In the end, as our findings blew us away, it becomes evident that behind every statistical model lies a story waiting to be uncovered—a story that may just lead us to appreciate the unexpected ways in which names and air pollution intertwine. With a chuckle and a sigh, we bid adieu until the next inquiry arises, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the quirks of scientific exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

It's been said that the air in Miami is as thick as the plot of a telenovela, but could there be more than just humidity and Cuban coffee influencing this city's ambient atmosphere? Our research aims to shed light on an unexpected factor: the popularity of the first name Wendy. Yes, you read that right—it's not just hurricanes and alligators making waves in the Sunshine State!

As we embarked on this journey, we couldn't help but wonder: What do you call a group of statisticians who research the connection between names and air pollution? Data winds! This study holds a unique mixture of empirical inquiry and whimsical curiosity, weaving a narrative that is sure to tickle the fancy of even the most serious academic scholars.

Our investigation took flight with data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency. And let's just say, as we delved deeper into the statistical ozone layer, the results were nothing short of, well, breathtaking! With a correlation coefficient of 0.8926439 and a p-value of less than 0.01, it became clear that there was more to the correlation between Wendy and air pollution than met the eye.

But amid our statistical voyage, one pressing question surfaced: What do you call a Wendy who loves to recycle? "Eco-Wendy-cally friendly!" We couldn't help but marvel at the curious connection between the rise in Wendy's popularity and the surge in air pollutants. It was as though the very mention of the name Wendy had the atmospheric quality of a high-pressure system, causing an uptick in environmental grime and grit.

It's no secret that researchers often find themselves knee-deep in data, but this time, we found ourselves waist-deep in a sea of surprising conclusions. Much like a good barometric pressure pun, our findings truly drive home the idea that there's more to the naming game than meets the scientific eye.

As we aim to capture the essence of our findings, we hope to spark a laugh or two along the way. After all, what's a research paper without a little scientific humor? Or, as we prefer to call it, "laboratori-tickles!" So, grab your data-filled balloons, dear reader, as we soar through the stratosphere of statistical discovery and whimsically probe the mysteries that lie beyond the veils of both nomenclature and environmental phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Wendy and Air pollution in Miami. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wending Through the Polluted Air: The Unlikely Link Between Wendy's Popularity and Air Quality in Miami

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study delves into the unexpected connection between the prevalence of the first name Wendy and air pollution levels in Miami. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a whimsical journey to investigate this seemingly whimsical correlation. Utilizing robust statistical analyses, including a correlation coefficient of 0.8926439 and p < 0.01, our findings reveal a startling association between the popularity of the name Wendy and air pollution levels from 1980 to 2022.

As our data unfolded like a refreshing gust of wind, we found a strong positive relationship between the rise in Wendy's popularity and the increase in air pollutants in Miami. It seems that while the name Wendy soared to new heights, so did the presence of harmful pollutants in the city's air. Our results raised the question: is this simply a peculiar coincidence, or is there truly a "Wendy effect" at play in shaping Miami's environmental landscape?

In this quest for knowledge, one cannot help but ponder: what's in a name? As we humorously sifted through the data, we couldn't help but think "Wendy's popularity sure has caused quite a stir, both figuratively and literally!" Despite the lighthearted nature of our investigation, the substantial statistical evidence encourages further exploration into the unconventional relationship between nomenclature and environmental phenomena.

In the end, as our findings blew us away, it becomes evident that behind every statistical model lies a story waiting to be uncovered—a story that may just lead us to appreciate the unexpected ways in which names and air pollution intertwine. With a chuckle and a sigh, we bid adieu until the next inquiry arises, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the quirks of scientific exploration.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
It's been said that the air in Miami is as thick as the plot of a telenovela, but could there be more than just humidity and Cuban coffee influencing this city's ambient atmosphere? Our research aims to shed light on an unexpected factor: the popularity of the first name Wendy. Yes, you read that right—it's not just hurricanes and alligators making waves in the Sunshine State!
As we embarked on this journey, we couldn't help but wonder: What do you call a group of statisticians who research the connection between names and air pollution? Data winds! This study holds a unique mixture of empirical inquiry and whimsical curiosity, weaving a narrative that is sure to tickle the fancy of even the most serious academic scholars.
Our investigation took flight with data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency. And let's just say, as we delved deeper into the statistical ozone layer, the results were nothing short of, well, breathtaking! With a correlation coefficient of 0.8926439 and a p-value of less than 0.01, it became clear that there was more to the correlation between Wendy and air pollution than met the eye.
But amid our statistical voyage, one pressing question surfaced: What do you call a Wendy who loves to recycle? "Eco-Wendy-cally friendly!" We couldn't help but marvel at the curious connection between the rise in Wendy's popularity and the surge in air pollutants. It was as though the very mention of the name Wendy had the atmospheric quality of a high-pressure system, causing an uptick in environmental grime and grit.
It's no secret that researchers often find themselves knee-deep in data, but this time, we found ourselves waist-deep in a sea of surprising conclusions. Much like a good barometric pressure pun, our findings truly drive home the idea that there's more to the naming game than meets the scientific eye.
As we aim to capture the essence of our findings, we hope to spark a laugh or two along the way. After all, what's a research paper without a little scientific humor? Or, as we prefer to call it, "laboratori-tickles!" So, grab your data-filled balloons, dear reader, as we soar through the stratosphere of statistical discovery and whimsically probe the mysteries that lie beyond the veils of both nomenclature and environmental phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Early research by Smith et al. (2010) suggested a potential link between the prevalence of specific names and environmental conditions. Their study focused on the diffusion of air pollutants and the distribution of first names in urban areas. In a similar vein, a study by Doe and Jones (2015) hinted at the notion that social and cultural factors may play a role in shaping environmental patterns, including air quality metrics.

As we navigated through the scholarly seas of research, we stumbled upon "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Analysis" by Dr. Clean Air, which explored the intricate relationship between human activities and air pollution. This extensive work cast a wide net over the understanding of environmental dynamics, providing a backdrop for our lighthearted inquiry into the unexpected connection between a popular moniker and atmospheric composition.

Adding an element of literary whimsy, our investigation took an unexpected turn as we delved into non-fiction works that seemed strangely relevant to our offbeat study. "Wendy: A Name Through the Ages" by Jane Historian and "Pollution, Miami, and the Puzzling Puzzle" by Dr. Environmentalist offered intriguing insights that unexpectedly intersected with our seemingly capricious research question.

The plot thickened—much like the air over Miami—as we stumbled upon fiction works that, at first glance, seemed unrelated to our scientific quest. However, "The Airbender's Daughter" by A. Nonymous and "Wendy's Wonderland: A Tale of Urban Ecology" by Fictitious Author intrigued us with their serendipitous titles, leading us down a rabbit hole of literary amusement.

In a last-ditch effort to glean unconventional insights, we turned to unconventional sources. Leafing through the local CVS receipts with the fervor of intrepid explorers, we uncovered a trove of data, including discounts on air fresheners and a coupon for a Wendy's Frosty, that left us questioning the very fabric of reality. While not a traditional method of scholarly inquiry, this peculiar endeavor yielded unexpected laughter and, surprisingly, a kernel of inspiration.

As we teetered on the precipice of scholarly decorum and scientific levity, it became evident that our pursuit of the peculiar had led us on an intellectual rollercoaster through the halls of rigorous inquiry and the corridors of comedic revelation. With the air of scholarly skepticism and the smirk of scientific jest, we plunged into uncharted territory, revealing the curious interplay between nomenclature and atmospheric conditions, one dad joke at a time.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Wendy and Air pollution in Miami. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 1980 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wending Through the Polluted Air: The Unlikely Link Between Wendy's Popularity and Air Quality in Miami

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study delves into the unexpected connection between the prevalence of the first name Wendy and air pollution levels in Miami. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a whimsical journey to investigate this seemingly whimsical correlation. Utilizing robust statistical analyses, including a correlation coefficient of 0.8926439 and p < 0.01, our findings reveal a startling association between the popularity of the name Wendy and air pollution levels from 1980 to 2022.

As our data unfolded like a refreshing gust of wind, we found a strong positive relationship between the rise in Wendy's popularity and the increase in air pollutants in Miami. It seems that while the name Wendy soared to new heights, so did the presence of harmful pollutants in the city's air. Our results raised the question: is this simply a peculiar coincidence, or is there truly a "Wendy effect" at play in shaping Miami's environmental landscape?

In this quest for knowledge, one cannot help but ponder: what's in a name? As we humorously sifted through the data, we couldn't help but think "Wendy's popularity sure has caused quite a stir, both figuratively and literally!" Despite the lighthearted nature of our investigation, the substantial statistical evidence encourages further exploration into the unconventional relationship between nomenclature and environmental phenomena.

In the end, as our findings blew us away, it becomes evident that behind every statistical model lies a story waiting to be uncovered—a story that may just lead us to appreciate the unexpected ways in which names and air pollution intertwine. With a chuckle and a sigh, we bid adieu until the next inquiry arises, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the quirks of scientific exploration.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
It's been said that the air in Miami is as thick as the plot of a telenovela, but could there be more than just humidity and Cuban coffee influencing this city's ambient atmosphere? Our research aims to shed light on an unexpected factor: the popularity of the first name Wendy. Yes, you read that right—it's not just hurricanes and alligators making waves in the Sunshine State!
As we embarked on this journey, we couldn't help but wonder: What do you call a group of statisticians who research the connection between names and air pollution? Data winds! This study holds a unique mixture of empirical inquiry and whimsical curiosity, weaving a narrative that is sure to tickle the fancy of even the most serious academic scholars.
Our investigation took flight with data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency. And let's just say, as we delved deeper into the statistical ozone layer, the results were nothing short of, well, breathtaking! With a correlation coefficient of 0.8926439 and a p-value of less than 0.01, it became clear that there was more to the correlation between Wendy and air pollution than met the eye.
But amid our statistical voyage, one pressing question surfaced: What do you call a Wendy who loves to recycle? "Eco-Wendy-cally friendly!" We couldn't help but marvel at the curious connection between the rise in Wendy's popularity and the surge in air pollutants. It was as though the very mention of the name Wendy had the atmospheric quality of a high-pressure system, causing an uptick in environmental grime and grit.
It's no secret that researchers often find themselves knee-deep in data, but this time, we found ourselves waist-deep in a sea of surprising conclusions. Much like a good barometric pressure pun, our findings truly drive home the idea that there's more to the naming game than meets the scientific eye.
As we aim to capture the essence of our findings, we hope to spark a laugh or two along the way. After all, what's a research paper without a little scientific humor? Or, as we prefer to call it, "laboratori-tickles!" So, grab your data-filled balloons, dear reader, as we soar through the stratosphere of statistical discovery and whimsically probe the mysteries that lie beyond the veils of both nomenclature and environmental phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology for this research project involved a series of captivating and data-rich endeavors that would make any scientist swoon with delight. To start, we summoned our data-wrangling prowess and harnessed the power of the internet—our trusty steed in the scientific realm. We accessed an extensive dataset of first names from the US Social Security Administration, meticulously combing through decades of naming trends akin to a determined prospector sifting through nuggets of statistical gold. After all, when it comes to uncovering the link between names and air pollution, one must be prepared to embark on a treasure hunt of sorts.

Now, let’s address the elephant in the laboratory: data collection. Like intrepid explorers seeking hidden treasure, we navigated the digital jungles of online databases and repositories. As we meticulously gathered information on the frequency of the first name Wendy across the years 1980 to 2022, we couldn’t help but feel a bit like statistical treasure hunters, charting a course through the labyrinth of historical naming records. It's safe to say, we were "Wendy diving" in a sea of numbers!

Next, armed with scientific rigor and gusto, we sought to investigate air pollution levels in Miami. We scoured the Environmental Protection Agency's air quality data like dedicated detectives hot on the trail of a mischievous suspect. Our commitment to uncovering the truth was unwavering as we traversed through pollutant concentration measurements, meteorological data, and air quality indices. It was like solving a pollution puzzle—one that would undoubtedly pique the curiosity of even the most seasoned research sherlocks.

As if the journey couldn't get any more intellectually thrilling, we then embarked on the statistical analyses phase. With the grace of a salsa dancer navigating the rhythm of the data, we executed various robust statistical methods. From correlation analyses employing Pearson's r to time series modeling akin to predicting the ebb and flow of ocean tides, we sought to unveil the intricate dance between the popularity of the name Wendy and the ebb and flow of air pollutants in Miami. It was a veritable statistical tango—a dance between variables that captivated our scientific souls.

What do you call a statistical study that grooves to the beat of science and whimsy? A correlation conga! Our approach was as on point as a lab technician in a salsa competition, and the outcomes were as eye-opening as a sudden gust of fresh air in a stuffy lab. We could hardly contain our excitement, much like a scientist on "statistical disco night"!

In summary, our methodology danced through the complexities of data acquisition, statistical analyses, and environmental exploration with a buoyant charm. It was a journey filled with scientific thrills—a quest where numbers met nomenclature in a harmonious waltz of statistical discovery. And just as a good experiment is often the perfect blend of measured precision and playful curiosity, our methodology aimed to capture the whimsy and wonder of scientific inquiry. So, join us as we spin through the methodology and into the heart of our statistical saga, dear reader!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Wendy and Air pollution in Miami. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 1980 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8926439, r-squared of 0.7968132, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wending Through the Polluted Air: The Unlikely Link Between Wendy's Popularity and Air Quality in Miami

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study delves into the unexpected connection between the prevalence of the first name Wendy and air pollution levels in Miami. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a whimsical journey to investigate this seemingly whimsical correlation. Utilizing robust statistical analyses, including a correlation coefficient of 0.8926439 and p < 0.01, our findings reveal a startling association between the popularity of the name Wendy and air pollution levels from 1980 to 2022.

As our data unfolded like a refreshing gust of wind, we found a strong positive relationship between the rise in Wendy's popularity and the increase in air pollutants in Miami. It seems that while the name Wendy soared to new heights, so did the presence of harmful pollutants in the city's air. Our results raised the question: is this simply a peculiar coincidence, or is there truly a "Wendy effect" at play in shaping Miami's environmental landscape?

In this quest for knowledge, one cannot help but ponder: what's in a name? As we humorously sifted through the data, we couldn't help but think "Wendy's popularity sure has caused quite a stir, both figuratively and literally!" Despite the lighthearted nature of our investigation, the substantial statistical evidence encourages further exploration into the unconventional relationship between nomenclature and environmental phenomena.

In the end, as our findings blew us away, it becomes evident that behind every statistical model lies a story waiting to be uncovered—a story that may just lead us to appreciate the unexpected ways in which names and air pollution intertwine. With a chuckle and a sigh, we bid adieu until the next inquiry arises, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the quirks of scientific exploration.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
It's been said that the air in Miami is as thick as the plot of a telenovela, but could there be more than just humidity and Cuban coffee influencing this city's ambient atmosphere? Our research aims to shed light on an unexpected factor: the popularity of the first name Wendy. Yes, you read that right—it's not just hurricanes and alligators making waves in the Sunshine State!
As we embarked on this journey, we couldn't help but wonder: What do you call a group of statisticians who research the connection between names and air pollution? Data winds! This study holds a unique mixture of empirical inquiry and whimsical curiosity, weaving a narrative that is sure to tickle the fancy of even the most serious academic scholars.
Our investigation took flight with data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency. And let's just say, as we delved deeper into the statistical ozone layer, the results were nothing short of, well, breathtaking! With a correlation coefficient of 0.8926439 and a p-value of less than 0.01, it became clear that there was more to the correlation between Wendy and air pollution than met the eye.
But amid our statistical voyage, one pressing question surfaced: What do you call a Wendy who loves to recycle? "Eco-Wendy-cally friendly!" We couldn't help but marvel at the curious connection between the rise in Wendy's popularity and the surge in air pollutants. It was as though the very mention of the name Wendy had the atmospheric quality of a high-pressure system, causing an uptick in environmental grime and grit.
It's no secret that researchers often find themselves knee-deep in data, but this time, we found ourselves waist-deep in a sea of surprising conclusions. Much like a good barometric pressure pun, our findings truly drive home the idea that there's more to the naming game than meets the scientific eye.
As we aim to capture the essence of our findings, we hope to spark a laugh or two along the way. After all, what's a research paper without a little scientific humor? Or, as we prefer to call it, "laboratori-tickles!" So, grab your data-filled balloons, dear reader, as we soar through the stratosphere of statistical discovery and whimsically probe the mysteries that lie beyond the veils of both nomenclature and environmental phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis unearthed a strong positive correlation between the prevalence of the first name Wendy and air pollution levels in Miami, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8926439 and an r-squared value of 0.7968132. This suggests that as the popularity of the name Wendy increased, so did the concentration of air pollutants, supporting our hypothesis that there exists a peculiar relationship between nomenclature and environmental quality.

Fig. 1 showcases the undeniable connection, almost as clear as a Floridian summer day, between the two variables. When we state that the evidence speaks volumes, we mean it quite literally in this case!

Diving deeper into our analysis, we were left pondering the question: Why did the statistician break up with the data scientist? He found someone less "mean"! As amusing as it may sound, the statistical significance with a p-value of less than 0.01 strengthens the notion that the association between the rise in Wendy's popularity and the surge in air pollutants cannot be dismissed as a mere coincidence.

Our findings present an intriguing tale of how something as seemingly unrelated as the popularity of a name could be intertwined with the environmental fabric of a city. It's almost like discovering a correlation between particle physics and pastry recipes – unexpected yet scientifically compelling!

As the data unfurled before our eyes, it became evident that in the grand symphony of scientific inquiry, every variable, no matter how unexpected, plays its part. And in the case of the Wendy-air pollution relationship, it seems that the name carries a weightier influence than previously presumed.

As we close this section on a statistically significant note, we leave you with a parting pun: Why was the statistician a terrible lover? He couldn't function when the missus asked for an "intimate moment." There’s always room for a pun in the realm of numbers and correlations!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Wendy and Air pollution in Miami. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Wending Through the Polluted Air: The Unlikely Link Between Wendy's Popularity and Air Quality in Miami

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study delves into the unexpected connection between the prevalence of the first name Wendy and air pollution levels in Miami. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a whimsical journey to investigate this seemingly whimsical correlation. Utilizing robust statistical analyses, including a correlation coefficient of 0.8926439 and p < 0.01, our findings reveal a startling association between the popularity of the name Wendy and air pollution levels from 1980 to 2022.

As our data unfolded like a refreshing gust of wind, we found a strong positive relationship between the rise in Wendy's popularity and the increase in air pollutants in Miami. It seems that while the name Wendy soared to new heights, so did the presence of harmful pollutants in the city's air. Our results raised the question: is this simply a peculiar coincidence, or is there truly a "Wendy effect" at play in shaping Miami's environmental landscape?

In this quest for knowledge, one cannot help but ponder: what's in a name? As we humorously sifted through the data, we couldn't help but think "Wendy's popularity sure has caused quite a stir, both figuratively and literally!" Despite the lighthearted nature of our investigation, the substantial statistical evidence encourages further exploration into the unconventional relationship between nomenclature and environmental phenomena.

In the end, as our findings blew us away, it becomes evident that behind every statistical model lies a story waiting to be uncovered—a story that may just lead us to appreciate the unexpected ways in which names and air pollution intertwine. With a chuckle and a sigh, we bid adieu until the next inquiry arises, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the quirks of scientific exploration.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Early research by Smith et al. (2010) suggested a potential link between the prevalence of specific names and environmental conditions. Their study focused on the diffusion of air pollutants and the distribution of first names in urban areas. In a similar vein, a study by Doe and Jones (2015) hinted at the notion that social and cultural factors may play a role in shaping environmental patterns, including air quality metrics.
As we navigated through the scholarly seas of research, we stumbled upon "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Analysis" by Dr. Clean Air, which explored the intricate relationship between human activities and air pollution. This extensive work cast a wide net over the understanding of environmental dynamics, providing a backdrop for our lighthearted inquiry into the unexpected connection between a popular moniker and atmospheric composition.
Adding an element of literary whimsy, our investigation took an unexpected turn as we delved into non-fiction works that seemed strangely relevant to our offbeat study. "Wendy: A Name Through the Ages" by Jane Historian and "Pollution, Miami, and the Puzzling Puzzle" by Dr. Environmentalist offered intriguing insights that unexpectedly intersected with our seemingly capricious research question.
The plot thickened—much like the air over Miami—as we stumbled upon fiction works that, at first glance, seemed unrelated to our scientific quest. However, "The Airbender's Daughter" by A. Nonymous and "Wendy's Wonderland: A Tale of Urban Ecology" by Fictitious Author intrigued us with their serendipitous titles, leading us down a rabbit hole of literary amusement.
In a last-ditch effort to glean unconventional insights, we turned to unconventional sources. Leafing through the local CVS receipts with the fervor of intrepid explorers, we uncovered a trove of data, including discounts on air fresheners and a coupon for a Wendy's Frosty, that left us questioning the very fabric of reality. While not a traditional method of scholarly inquiry, this peculiar endeavor yielded unexpected laughter and, surprisingly, a kernel of inspiration.
As we teetered on the precipice of scholarly decorum and scientific levity, it became evident that our pursuit of the peculiar had led us on an intellectual rollercoaster through the halls of rigorous inquiry and the corridors of comedic revelation. With the air of scholarly skepticism and the smirk of scientific jest, we plunged into uncharted territory, revealing the curious interplay between nomenclature and atmospheric conditions, one dad joke at a time.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis unearthed a strong positive correlation between the prevalence of the first name Wendy and air pollution levels in Miami, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8926439 and an r-squared value of 0.7968132. This suggests that as the popularity of the name Wendy increased, so did the concentration of air pollutants, supporting our hypothesis that there exists a peculiar relationship between nomenclature and environmental quality.
Fig. 1 showcases the undeniable connection, almost as clear as a Floridian summer day, between the two variables. When we state that the evidence speaks volumes, we mean it quite literally in this case!
Diving deeper into our analysis, we were left pondering the question: Why did the statistician break up with the data scientist? He found someone less "mean"! As amusing as it may sound, the statistical significance with a p-value of less than 0.01 strengthens the notion that the association between the rise in Wendy's popularity and the surge in air pollutants cannot be dismissed as a mere coincidence.
Our findings present an intriguing tale of how something as seemingly unrelated as the popularity of a name could be intertwined with the environmental fabric of a city. It's almost like discovering a correlation between particle physics and pastry recipes – unexpected yet scientifically compelling!
As the data unfurled before our eyes, it became evident that in the grand symphony of scientific inquiry, every variable, no matter how unexpected, plays its part. And in the case of the Wendy-air pollution relationship, it seems that the name carries a weightier influence than previously presumed.
As we close this section on a statistically significant note, we leave you with a parting pun: Why was the statistician a terrible lover? He couldn't function when the missus asked for an "intimate moment." There’s always room for a pun in the realm of numbers and correlations!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation into the peculiar correlation between the prevalence of the first name Wendy and air pollution levels in Miami has yielded remarkable insights that can't be brushed off – much like a sneeze-inducing speck of pollen in the air! With a correlation coefficient of 0.8926439 and p < 0.01, our results resonate with prior research findings. It seems that there's more to this Wendy and pollution dance than meets the eye – a bit like a scientific tango!

The findings from Smith et al. (2010) and Doe and Jones (2015) foreshadowed our discovery, hinting at the uncanny influence of social factors on environmental variables. It's almost as if statistical models have a sense of humor, don't they? As if to say, "No, we're not just about numbers; we've got a knack for whimsy too!"

The unexpected synergy between our results and the literary musings of "Wendy: A Name Through the Ages" by Jane Historian and "Pollution, Miami, and the Puzzling Puzzle" by Dr. Environmentalist provides a surreal sense of validation to our offbeat pursuit. It's like finding a rare Pokémon in the tall scientific grass, isn't it?

Furthermore, our study adds an extra layer of nuance to the broader narrative of environmental dynamics. It's as if we've stumbled upon a hidden subplot in the tale of urban ecology – a subplot featuring a spunky character named Wendy and her unusual yet compelling influence on Miami's atmospheric composition.

The statistical significance affirmed by our analysis echoes the sentiments of Dr. Clean Air, albeit in a more lighthearted tone. After all, who would have thought that the popularity of a name could carry such weight in shaping a city's environmental trajectory? It's like finding a sunflower in a field of statistical weeds – unexpected yet undeniably brilliant!

As we conclude this chapter of our scientific pursuit, we can't help but revel in the humor and curiosity that defined this improbable journey. It's a reminder that scientific inquiry doesn't always have to be buttoned-up and serious – there's room for a chuckle and a quirky observation, even amidst the most unexpected of correlations. After all, who said science and a good dad joke can't share the same lab coat?



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Wendy and Air pollution in Miami. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Wending Through the Polluted Air: The Unlikely Link Between Wendy's Popularity and Air Quality in Miami

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking study delves into the unexpected connection between the prevalence of the first name Wendy and air pollution levels in Miami. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a whimsical journey to investigate this seemingly whimsical correlation. Utilizing robust statistical analyses, including a correlation coefficient of 0.8926439 and p < 0.01, our findings reveal a startling association between the popularity of the name Wendy and air pollution levels from 1980 to 2022.

As our data unfolded like a refreshing gust of wind, we found a strong positive relationship between the rise in Wendy's popularity and the increase in air pollutants in Miami. It seems that while the name Wendy soared to new heights, so did the presence of harmful pollutants in the city's air. Our results raised the question: is this simply a peculiar coincidence, or is there truly a "Wendy effect" at play in shaping Miami's environmental landscape?

In this quest for knowledge, one cannot help but ponder: what's in a name? As we humorously sifted through the data, we couldn't help but think "Wendy's popularity sure has caused quite a stir, both figuratively and literally!" Despite the lighthearted nature of our investigation, the substantial statistical evidence encourages further exploration into the unconventional relationship between nomenclature and environmental phenomena.

In the end, as our findings blew us away, it becomes evident that behind every statistical model lies a story waiting to be uncovered—a story that may just lead us to appreciate the unexpected ways in which names and air pollution intertwine. With a chuckle and a sigh, we bid adieu until the next inquiry arises, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the quirks of scientific exploration.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
It's been said that the air in Miami is as thick as the plot of a telenovela, but could there be more than just humidity and Cuban coffee influencing this city's ambient atmosphere? Our research aims to shed light on an unexpected factor: the popularity of the first name Wendy. Yes, you read that right—it's not just hurricanes and alligators making waves in the Sunshine State!
As we embarked on this journey, we couldn't help but wonder: What do you call a group of statisticians who research the connection between names and air pollution? Data winds! This study holds a unique mixture of empirical inquiry and whimsical curiosity, weaving a narrative that is sure to tickle the fancy of even the most serious academic scholars.
Our investigation took flight with data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency. And let's just say, as we delved deeper into the statistical ozone layer, the results were nothing short of, well, breathtaking! With a correlation coefficient of 0.8926439 and a p-value of less than 0.01, it became clear that there was more to the correlation between Wendy and air pollution than met the eye.
But amid our statistical voyage, one pressing question surfaced: What do you call a Wendy who loves to recycle? "Eco-Wendy-cally friendly!" We couldn't help but marvel at the curious connection between the rise in Wendy's popularity and the surge in air pollutants. It was as though the very mention of the name Wendy had the atmospheric quality of a high-pressure system, causing an uptick in environmental grime and grit.
It's no secret that researchers often find themselves knee-deep in data, but this time, we found ourselves waist-deep in a sea of surprising conclusions. Much like a good barometric pressure pun, our findings truly drive home the idea that there's more to the naming game than meets the scientific eye.
As we aim to capture the essence of our findings, we hope to spark a laugh or two along the way. After all, what's a research paper without a little scientific humor? Or, as we prefer to call it, "laboratori-tickles!" So, grab your data-filled balloons, dear reader, as we soar through the stratosphere of statistical discovery and whimsically probe the mysteries that lie beyond the veils of both nomenclature and environmental phenomena.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis unearthed a strong positive correlation between the prevalence of the first name Wendy and air pollution levels in Miami, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8926439 and an r-squared value of 0.7968132. This suggests that as the popularity of the name Wendy increased, so did the concentration of air pollutants, supporting our hypothesis that there exists a peculiar relationship between nomenclature and environmental quality.
Fig. 1 showcases the undeniable connection, almost as clear as a Floridian summer day, between the two variables. When we state that the evidence speaks volumes, we mean it quite literally in this case!
Diving deeper into our analysis, we were left pondering the question: Why did the statistician break up with the data scientist? He found someone less "mean"! As amusing as it may sound, the statistical significance with a p-value of less than 0.01 strengthens the notion that the association between the rise in Wendy's popularity and the surge in air pollutants cannot be dismissed as a mere coincidence.
Our findings present an intriguing tale of how something as seemingly unrelated as the popularity of a name could be intertwined with the environmental fabric of a city. It's almost like discovering a correlation between particle physics and pastry recipes – unexpected yet scientifically compelling!
As the data unfurled before our eyes, it became evident that in the grand symphony of scientific inquiry, every variable, no matter how unexpected, plays its part. And in the case of the Wendy-air pollution relationship, it seems that the name carries a weightier influence than previously presumed.
As we close this section on a statistically significant note, we leave you with a parting pun: Why was the statistician a terrible lover? He couldn't function when the missus asked for an "intimate moment." There’s always room for a pun in the realm of numbers and correlations!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our whimsical yet rigorous investigation has uncovered a surprising link between the popularity of the name Wendy and air pollution levels in Miami. Our findings soar higher than a helium balloon on a summer day, highlighting a strong positive correlation between the two variables that's as clear as a cloudless Floridian sky. It seems that there truly is an enchanting "Wendy effect" at play, shaping the environmental landscape of this vibrant city. We'd say the evidence is as airtight as a sealed lab chamber!

As we take a lighthearted step back from this investigation, it's worth remembering that sometimes the most unexpected connections lead to the most uplifting discoveries. And speaking of uplifting, this finding has blown us away—just like a strong breeze on a sunny Miami beach! We must admit, it's like discovering the perfect mix of nitrogen and oxygen in a statistical cocktail.

Although our foray into this peculiar correlation has been a breath of fresh air, we're confident that our findings will encourage further exploration into the intriguing relationship between nomenclature and environmental phenomena. Who knows, maybe we'll stumble upon a connection between the name "Gus" and garden growth, or "Bella" and biodiversity! Research truly is full of surprises, just like finding a controlled experiment at a chaotic laboratory.

Now, as we wrap up, we'd like to leave you with a final dad joke. Why did the statistician go to therapy? To work through his "regression" issues! But in all seriousness, it's clear that no more research is needed in this area. Our findings blow away any doubts about the relevance of our work, leaving us with a firm conclusion that the "Wendy effect" is indeed a tangible force in shaping Miami's air quality. It's time to let this groundbreaking discovery float away on the zephyrs of scientific acclaim—with a chuckle and a sigh, until the next inquiry beckons.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Wending Through the Polluted Air: The Unlikely Link Between Wendy's Popularity and Air Quality in Miami. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Fast Food and Environmental Science


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Wending Through the Polluted Air: The Unlikely Link Between Wendy's Popularity and Air Quality in Miami. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Fast Food Culture and Environmental Impact


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Wending Through the Polluted Air: The Unlikely Link Between Wendy's Popularity and Air Quality in Miami with an abstract of This groundbreaking study delves into the unexpected connection between the prevalence of the first name Wendy and air pollution levels in Miami. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team embarked on a whimsical journey to investigate this seemingly whimsical correlation. Utilizing robust statistical analyses, including a correlation coefficient of 0.8926439 and p < 0.01, our findings reveal a startling association between the popularity of the name Wendy and air pollution levels from 1980 to 2022.
As our data unfolded like a refreshing gust of wind, we found a strong positive relationship between the rise in Wendy's popularity and the increase in air pollutants in Miami. It seems that while the name Wendy soared to new heights, so did the presence of harmful pollutants in the city's air. Our results raised the question: is this simply a peculiar coincidence, or is there truly a "Wendy effect" at play in shaping Miami's environmental landscape?
In this quest for knowledge, one cannot help but ponder: what's in a name? As we humorously sifted through the data, we couldn't help but think "Wendy's popularity sure has caused quite a stir, both figuratively and literally!" Despite the lighthearted nature of our investigation, the substantial statistical evidence encourages further exploration into the unconventional relationship between nomenclature and environmental phenomena.
In the end, as our findings blew us away, it becomes evident that behind every statistical model lies a story waiting to be uncovered—a story that may just lead us to appreciate the unexpected ways in which names and air pollution intertwine. With a chuckle and a sigh, we bid adieu until the next inquiry arises, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the quirks of scientific exploration.

ChatGPT:

Wendy, air pollution, Miami, correlation, statistical analysis, US Social Security Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, environmental phenomena, name popularity, pollution levels, Miami air quality, unconventional relationship, statistical evidence, nomenclature, Wendy effect, environmental landscape, data analysis, research findings

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Wendy
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Wendy
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Wendy

Air pollution in Miami
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Miami

Correlation r = 0.8926439 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7968132 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 79.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Miami) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Wendy) over the 43 years from 1980 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.9E-16. 0.0000000000000008944151414129
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 8.9E-14% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,118,049,050,936,580 random variables You don't actually need 1 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 42 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 42 because we have two variables measured over a period of 43 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Wendy (Babies born)416236332837239920311796154113711302135714141367126912721140104797991386790510131262120910931046901935864688599498424359395358288328230272222195196192
Air pollution in Miami (Bad air quality days)24.590223.013710.68498.767126.010935.479453.835626.301376.557385.205482.465751.369865.464485.479453.287674.383562.185793.835629.04116.301375.464483.287671.369861.369862.459022.465753.287673.561642.185790.8219181.369862.465751.09291.369861.369860.2739731.652892.234641.095890.5494510.5464480.8219180.547945




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4162,3633,2837,2399,2031,1796,1541,1371,1302,1357,1414,1367,1269,1272,1140,1047,979,913,867,905,1013,1262,1209,1093,1046,901,935,864,688,599,498,424,359,395,358,288,328,230,272,222,195,196,192,])
array_2 = np.array([24.5902,23.0137,10.6849,8.76712,6.01093,5.47945,3.83562,6.30137,6.55738,5.20548,2.46575,1.36986,5.46448,5.47945,3.28767,4.38356,2.18579,3.83562,9.0411,6.30137,5.46448,3.28767,1.36986,1.36986,2.45902,2.46575,3.28767,3.56164,2.18579,0.821918,1.36986,2.46575,1.0929,1.36986,1.36986,0.273973,1.65289,2.23464,1.09589,0.549451,0.546448,0.821918,0.547945,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Wendy"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Miami"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 1510 · Black Variable ID: 2549 · Red Variable ID: 20896
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0