about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,490 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in soybeans in Missouri and the second variable is Liquefied petroleum gas used in Poland.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the soybeans in Missouri became more genetically modified, they developed a surprising side effect - they started emitting gas that was quickly liquefying in the fields. This led to an unexpected boost in the production of Liquefied Petroleum Gas, which somehow made its way all the way to Poland. It's a classic case of legume-induced gas escalation leading to an international energy connection! Who would have thought that GMO soybeans could have such a slippery impact on the LPG industry in Poland?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie, portraying the two simultaneous scenes: In a Missouri field, large soybean plants with bright green leaves stand tall under the sunny sky. A farmer is inspecting the healthy crop, which has been genetically modified to resist pests and produce higher yields. Meanwhile, in Poland, a group of workers is using liquefied petroleum gas to power a forklift as they load crates onto a truck for transportation. The two scenes represent the simultaneous use of GMO soybeans in Missouri and the use of liquefied petroleum gas in Poland. The image should emphasize the vibrant colors of the soybean plants and the sunny sky, as well as the industrial setting of the workers loading crates onto the truck, with a focus on the contrasting environments of the two settings. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in soybeans in Missouri and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Poland. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Sci-fi fantacy Oragami Woodblock painting An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Cubism
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in soybeans in Missouri and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Poland together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a Missouri field, large soybean plants with bright green leaves stand tall under the sunny sky. A farmer is inspecting the healthy crop, which has been genetically modified to resist pests and produce higher yields. Meanwhile, in Poland, a group of workers is using liquefied petroleum gas to power a forklift as they load crates onto a truck for transportation. The two scenes represent the simultaneous use of GMO soybeans in Missouri and the use of liquefied petroleum gas in Poland.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In a Missouri field, large soybean plants with bright green leaves stand tall under the sunny sky. A farmer is inspecting the healthy crop, which has been genetically modified to resist pests and produce higher yields. Meanwhile, in Poland, a group of workers is using liquefied petroleum gas to power a forklift as they load crates onto a truck for transportation. The two scenes represent the simultaneous use of GMO soybeans in Missouri and the use of liquefied petroleum gas in Poland. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie, portraying the two simultaneous scenes: In a Missouri field, large soybean plants with bright green leaves stand tall under the sunny sky. A farmer is inspecting the healthy crop, which has been genetically modified to resist pests and produce higher yields. Meanwhile, in Poland, a group of workers is using liquefied petroleum gas to power a forklift as they load crates onto a truck for transportation. The two scenes represent the simultaneous use of GMO soybeans in Missouri and the use of liquefied petroleum gas in Poland. The image should emphasize the vibrant colors of the soybean plants and the sunny sky, as well as the industrial setting of the workers loading crates onto the truck, with a focus on the contrasting environments of the two settings.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in soybeans in Missouri caused Liquefied petroleum gas used in Poland to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Soy to the World: Exploring the GMO-Soybean and LPGas Connection

The Journal of Agricultural Alchemy

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Missouri and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Poland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from USDA and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9477541 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Soy to the World: Exploring the GMO-Soybean and LPGas Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the soy-surreal world of agricultural and energy connections, exploring the tangled web of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPGas) in Poland. Our research team used data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration to peel back the layers of this mysterious alliance. The correlation coefficient of 0.9477541 and p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022 left us bean-counting with excitement. We unraveled the sprawling tendrils of GMO-soybean production and their curious link to the demand for LPGas in a transcontinental twist that's more than just a tempest in a teapot. So, hold onto your soy latte, we're about to soy-ve into an off-bean area of research and unearth some gas-tly marvelous findings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Missouri and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Poland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Soy to the World: Exploring the GMO-Soybean and LPGas Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the soy-surreal world of agricultural and energy connections, exploring the tangled web of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPGas) in Poland. Our research team used data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration to peel back the layers of this mysterious alliance. The correlation coefficient of 0.9477541 and p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022 left us bean-counting with excitement. We unraveled the sprawling tendrils of GMO-soybean production and their curious link to the demand for LPGas in a transcontinental twist that's more than just a tempest in a teapot. So, hold onto your soy latte, we're about to soy-ve into an off-bean area of research and unearth some gas-tly marvelous findings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The world of agriculture and energy may seem like two peas in a pod, but the connection between GMO-soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPGas) in Poland is more like a case of "soy meets world." While it may sound like a soy-operatic tale, the relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities has piqued the curiosity of researchers and raised eyebrows in both agricultural and energy sectors.

On the one hand, we have the GMO-soybeans, the prodigal poster child of modern agriculture, with its genetically engineered resilience and prolific productivity. On the other hand, we have LPGas, the lesser-known but indispensable player in the energy market, keeping the flames of industry and commerce burning bright in countries like Poland.

The intertwining of these two seemingly disparate elements has sparked a whirlwind of speculation. Are the GMO-soybeans in Missouri whispering secrets to the LPGas in Poland, creating a symbiotic relationship that defies conventional wisdom? Or is this all just a soyful tempest in a LPGas canister?

In this paper, we delve into the tangled vines of GMO-soybean production and its unlikely dance with the demand for LPGas in Poland, aiming to shed light on the clandestine connections and unveil the gassy truths that lie beneath the surface. Get ready to peel back the layers of this soy-prise and unearth some gas-tly magnificent revelations.

So, grab your soy latte and buckle up, because we're about to embark on a journey that's more than just a hill of beans—it's the soy to the world.

Let's connect the dots in this soy-ful and gas-tating exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Missouri and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Poland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Soy to the World: Exploring the GMO-Soybean and LPGas Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the soy-surreal world of agricultural and energy connections, exploring the tangled web of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPGas) in Poland. Our research team used data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration to peel back the layers of this mysterious alliance. The correlation coefficient of 0.9477541 and p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022 left us bean-counting with excitement. We unraveled the sprawling tendrils of GMO-soybean production and their curious link to the demand for LPGas in a transcontinental twist that's more than just a tempest in a teapot. So, hold onto your soy latte, we're about to soy-ve into an off-bean area of research and unearth some gas-tly marvelous findings.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of agriculture and energy may seem like two peas in a pod, but the connection between GMO-soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPGas) in Poland is more like a case of "soy meets world." While it may sound like a soy-operatic tale, the relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities has piqued the curiosity of researchers and raised eyebrows in both agricultural and energy sectors.
On the one hand, we have the GMO-soybeans, the prodigal poster child of modern agriculture, with its genetically engineered resilience and prolific productivity. On the other hand, we have LPGas, the lesser-known but indispensable player in the energy market, keeping the flames of industry and commerce burning bright in countries like Poland.
The intertwining of these two seemingly disparate elements has sparked a whirlwind of speculation. Are the GMO-soybeans in Missouri whispering secrets to the LPGas in Poland, creating a symbiotic relationship that defies conventional wisdom? Or is this all just a soyful tempest in a LPGas canister?
In this paper, we delve into the tangled vines of GMO-soybean production and its unlikely dance with the demand for LPGas in Poland, aiming to shed light on the clandestine connections and unveil the gassy truths that lie beneath the surface. Get ready to peel back the layers of this soy-prise and unearth some gas-tly magnificent revelations.
So, grab your soy latte and buckle up, because we're about to embark on a journey that's more than just a hill of beans—it's the soy to the world.
Let's connect the dots in this soy-ful and gas-tating exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Soybean Genetics and Biotechnology: Genetic Traits and Protection" by Smith et al., the authors find that the widespread use of genetically modified soybeans has revolutionized agricultural practices, leading to increased yields and enhanced crop resilience. The introduction of GMO-soybeans has sparked debates surrounding their environmental impact and potential health concerns, but the agricultural community continues to embrace these biotechnological advancements with fervor. Meanwhile, "The Economics of Liquefied Petroleum Gas" by Doe and Jones delves into the intricate market dynamics and consumption patterns of LPGas, shedding light on its pivotal role in powering industries and households across the globe.

Delving beyond the scholarly realms, real-world narratives such as Michael Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" and "The Botany of Desire" offer captivating insights into the interplay between agriculture, genetically modified crops, and human consumption. These literary explorations highlight the nuanced relationships between food production, consumer choices, and societal impacts, providing a rich tapestry for understanding the complexities of modern agricultural practices.

Additionally, the fictional realm offers tantalizing glimpses into the soy-lutions and gas-tastic adventures that may lie beyond the realm of empirical investigation. Works like "Soybeans of Endearment" and "LPGas and Prejudice" add whimsical twists to the interwoven narratives of soybean cultivation and energy consumption, blurring the lines between reality and imagination.

Venturing further into the absurd, the exhaustive literature review also encompasses unconventional sources, including interpretive readings of grocery store receipts, conspiracy theories involving sentient soybean pods, and even the purported memoir of a rogue LPGas canister seeking adventure across international borders. While these unconventional sources may raise eyebrows in academic circles, their inclusion serves as a playful reminder of the boundless creativity that infuses the pursuit of knowledge.

In the vein of soy-ful musings and gas-tating inquiries, the literature review, true to the spirit of scientific inquiry, embraces a spectrum of sources that reflect the multidimensional nature of the soy-GMO and LPGas connection. As we gallop through this soybean field of literature, let us recollect that the pursuit of knowledge is not merely a bean-counting exercise, but a whimsical odyssey that invites both scholarly rigor and light-hearted revelry. So, as we embark on this scholarly quest, let us remain attuned to soy-prises and gas-tounding revelations that may await us beyond the pages of conventional wisdom.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Missouri and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Poland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2000 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Soy to the World: Exploring the GMO-Soybean and LPGas Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the soy-surreal world of agricultural and energy connections, exploring the tangled web of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPGas) in Poland. Our research team used data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration to peel back the layers of this mysterious alliance. The correlation coefficient of 0.9477541 and p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022 left us bean-counting with excitement. We unraveled the sprawling tendrils of GMO-soybean production and their curious link to the demand for LPGas in a transcontinental twist that's more than just a tempest in a teapot. So, hold onto your soy latte, we're about to soy-ve into an off-bean area of research and unearth some gas-tly marvelous findings.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of agriculture and energy may seem like two peas in a pod, but the connection between GMO-soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPGas) in Poland is more like a case of "soy meets world." While it may sound like a soy-operatic tale, the relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities has piqued the curiosity of researchers and raised eyebrows in both agricultural and energy sectors.
On the one hand, we have the GMO-soybeans, the prodigal poster child of modern agriculture, with its genetically engineered resilience and prolific productivity. On the other hand, we have LPGas, the lesser-known but indispensable player in the energy market, keeping the flames of industry and commerce burning bright in countries like Poland.
The intertwining of these two seemingly disparate elements has sparked a whirlwind of speculation. Are the GMO-soybeans in Missouri whispering secrets to the LPGas in Poland, creating a symbiotic relationship that defies conventional wisdom? Or is this all just a soyful tempest in a LPGas canister?
In this paper, we delve into the tangled vines of GMO-soybean production and its unlikely dance with the demand for LPGas in Poland, aiming to shed light on the clandestine connections and unveil the gassy truths that lie beneath the surface. Get ready to peel back the layers of this soy-prise and unearth some gas-tly magnificent revelations.
So, grab your soy latte and buckle up, because we're about to embark on a journey that's more than just a hill of beans—it's the soy to the world.
Let's connect the dots in this soy-ful and gas-tating exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In this study, we employed a multidisciplinary approach to disentangle the perplexing relationship between GMO-soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPGas) in Poland. Our methodology, while not as enigmatic as molecular gastronomy, involved gathering and analyzing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration. We also made ample use of other relevant scholarly resources.

To begin, we conducted a comprehensive review of existing literature on GMO-soybean production, focusing on the factors influencing soybean yields, area harvested, and genetic modifications. We sifted through a mountain of articles, like soybeans in a threshing machine, to extract the most pertinent information for our analysis.

Our investigation into the European energy landscape led us to the consumption patterns and demand for LPGas in Poland. This involved poring over statistical data, energy consumption reports, and market analyses to understand the intricacies of LPGas usage.

To establish the temporal context of our study, we collected data spanning the years 2000 to 2022. This time frame allowed us to observe long-term trends and fluctuations in GMO-soybean production in Missouri and the consumption of LPGas in Poland. We also chose this temporal span to capture any dynamic changes in the relationship between GMO-soybeans and LPGas over the past two decades.

We then harnessed the power of statistical analysis to quantify the potential connection between GMO-soybean production and LPGas consumption. Employing the Pearson correlation coefficient, we measured the strength and direction of the relationship between these two variables. The use of the p-value further provided insight into the significance of our findings, akin to using a magnifying glass to inspect the intricate patterns in a soybean leaf.

Additionally, we conducted regression analysis to examine the potential effect of GMO-soybean production on LPGas consumption, considering factors such as economic indicators, energy policies, and trade dynamics. This allowed us to tease out the most salient variables contributing to the observed patterns, like unraveling a stubborn knot in a soybean pod.

Finally, to enhance the robustness of our analysis, we employed advanced econometric techniques, including instrumental variables and time series analysis. This approach enabled us to account for potential confounding factors and temporal dependencies that might sway the GMO-soybean and LPGas relationship, imbuing our study with the precision of a well-tuned combine harvester.

In essence, our methodological journey took us from the verdant fields of agronomy to the bustling energy markets of Europe, weaving together disparate strands of data and analysis to unravel the enigmatic link between GMO-soybeans and LPGas. We tirelessly pursued this connection with the dedication of a soybean farmer and the foresight of an energy economist, leaving no soybean unturned and no LPGas unexamined.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Missouri and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Poland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2000 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9477541, r-squared of 0.8982379, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Soy to the World: Exploring the GMO-Soybean and LPGas Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the soy-surreal world of agricultural and energy connections, exploring the tangled web of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPGas) in Poland. Our research team used data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration to peel back the layers of this mysterious alliance. The correlation coefficient of 0.9477541 and p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022 left us bean-counting with excitement. We unraveled the sprawling tendrils of GMO-soybean production and their curious link to the demand for LPGas in a transcontinental twist that's more than just a tempest in a teapot. So, hold onto your soy latte, we're about to soy-ve into an off-bean area of research and unearth some gas-tly marvelous findings.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of agriculture and energy may seem like two peas in a pod, but the connection between GMO-soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPGas) in Poland is more like a case of "soy meets world." While it may sound like a soy-operatic tale, the relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities has piqued the curiosity of researchers and raised eyebrows in both agricultural and energy sectors.
On the one hand, we have the GMO-soybeans, the prodigal poster child of modern agriculture, with its genetically engineered resilience and prolific productivity. On the other hand, we have LPGas, the lesser-known but indispensable player in the energy market, keeping the flames of industry and commerce burning bright in countries like Poland.
The intertwining of these two seemingly disparate elements has sparked a whirlwind of speculation. Are the GMO-soybeans in Missouri whispering secrets to the LPGas in Poland, creating a symbiotic relationship that defies conventional wisdom? Or is this all just a soyful tempest in a LPGas canister?
In this paper, we delve into the tangled vines of GMO-soybean production and its unlikely dance with the demand for LPGas in Poland, aiming to shed light on the clandestine connections and unveil the gassy truths that lie beneath the surface. Get ready to peel back the layers of this soy-prise and unearth some gas-tly magnificent revelations.
So, grab your soy latte and buckle up, because we're about to embark on a journey that's more than just a hill of beans—it's the soy to the world.
Let's connect the dots in this soy-ful and gas-tating exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data revealed a strong correlation between the use of GMO soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPGas) in Poland over the period from 2000 to 2022. Our research team found a correlation coefficient of 0.9477541, indicating a robust positive relationship between the two variables. The high R-squared value of 0.8982379 suggests that approximately 89.82% of the variance in LPGas consumption in Poland can be explained by the use of GMO soybeans in Missouri. The p-value of less than 0.01 further confirms the significance of this relationship, providing compelling evidence to support our findings.

Figure 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the clear correlation between the use of GMO soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of LPGas in Poland. The points on the plot form a tightly clustered pattern, emphasizing the strength of the relationship between these seemingly disparate elements. This visual representation reinforces the statistical indicators and offers a tangible illustration of the link we have uncovered.

The findings from this analysis present a compelling soy-nario, highlighting the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and energy consumption on an international scale. While it may seem like a soy-prise, the data speaks volumes about the intricate connections that weave through the fabric of our global ecosystem.

In sum, our research has unveiled a gas-tly marvelous revelation, shedding light on the clandestine correlations between GMO soybean production in Missouri and the demand for LPGas in Poland. This soy-ful tempest in a teapot has certainly sparked a flurry of speculation, but the data unequivocally supports the existence of this unique relationship. As we digest these findings, it's clear that the world of agricultural and energy connections is more than just a hill of beans—it's the soy to the world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Missouri and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Poland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Soy to the World: Exploring the GMO-Soybean and LPGas Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the soy-surreal world of agricultural and energy connections, exploring the tangled web of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPGas) in Poland. Our research team used data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration to peel back the layers of this mysterious alliance. The correlation coefficient of 0.9477541 and p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022 left us bean-counting with excitement. We unraveled the sprawling tendrils of GMO-soybean production and their curious link to the demand for LPGas in a transcontinental twist that's more than just a tempest in a teapot. So, hold onto your soy latte, we're about to soy-ve into an off-bean area of research and unearth some gas-tly marvelous findings.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Soybean Genetics and Biotechnology: Genetic Traits and Protection" by Smith et al., the authors find that the widespread use of genetically modified soybeans has revolutionized agricultural practices, leading to increased yields and enhanced crop resilience. The introduction of GMO-soybeans has sparked debates surrounding their environmental impact and potential health concerns, but the agricultural community continues to embrace these biotechnological advancements with fervor. Meanwhile, "The Economics of Liquefied Petroleum Gas" by Doe and Jones delves into the intricate market dynamics and consumption patterns of LPGas, shedding light on its pivotal role in powering industries and households across the globe.
Delving beyond the scholarly realms, real-world narratives such as Michael Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" and "The Botany of Desire" offer captivating insights into the interplay between agriculture, genetically modified crops, and human consumption. These literary explorations highlight the nuanced relationships between food production, consumer choices, and societal impacts, providing a rich tapestry for understanding the complexities of modern agricultural practices.
Additionally, the fictional realm offers tantalizing glimpses into the soy-lutions and gas-tastic adventures that may lie beyond the realm of empirical investigation. Works like "Soybeans of Endearment" and "LPGas and Prejudice" add whimsical twists to the interwoven narratives of soybean cultivation and energy consumption, blurring the lines between reality and imagination.
Venturing further into the absurd, the exhaustive literature review also encompasses unconventional sources, including interpretive readings of grocery store receipts, conspiracy theories involving sentient soybean pods, and even the purported memoir of a rogue LPGas canister seeking adventure across international borders. While these unconventional sources may raise eyebrows in academic circles, their inclusion serves as a playful reminder of the boundless creativity that infuses the pursuit of knowledge.
In the vein of soy-ful musings and gas-tating inquiries, the literature review, true to the spirit of scientific inquiry, embraces a spectrum of sources that reflect the multidimensional nature of the soy-GMO and LPGas connection. As we gallop through this soybean field of literature, let us recollect that the pursuit of knowledge is not merely a bean-counting exercise, but a whimsical odyssey that invites both scholarly rigor and light-hearted revelry. So, as we embark on this scholarly quest, let us remain attuned to soy-prises and gas-tounding revelations that may await us beyond the pages of conventional wisdom.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a strong correlation between the use of GMO soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPGas) in Poland over the period from 2000 to 2022. Our research team found a correlation coefficient of 0.9477541, indicating a robust positive relationship between the two variables. The high R-squared value of 0.8982379 suggests that approximately 89.82% of the variance in LPGas consumption in Poland can be explained by the use of GMO soybeans in Missouri. The p-value of less than 0.01 further confirms the significance of this relationship, providing compelling evidence to support our findings.
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the clear correlation between the use of GMO soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of LPGas in Poland. The points on the plot form a tightly clustered pattern, emphasizing the strength of the relationship between these seemingly disparate elements. This visual representation reinforces the statistical indicators and offers a tangible illustration of the link we have uncovered.
The findings from this analysis present a compelling soy-nario, highlighting the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and energy consumption on an international scale. While it may seem like a soy-prise, the data speaks volumes about the intricate connections that weave through the fabric of our global ecosystem.
In sum, our research has unveiled a gas-tly marvelous revelation, shedding light on the clandestine correlations between GMO soybean production in Missouri and the demand for LPGas in Poland. This soy-ful tempest in a teapot has certainly sparked a flurry of speculation, but the data unequivocally supports the existence of this unique relationship. As we digest these findings, it's clear that the world of agricultural and energy connections is more than just a hill of beans—it's the soy to the world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The soybean saga continues to unveil its gas-tating mysteries as our findings affirm and amplify the soy-ful reflections and gas-tastic adventures documented in the literature.

Smith et al.'s exploration of genetically modified soybeans mirrors our own observations, revealing the revolutionary impact of GMO technology on soybean production. Our data underscores the enduring influence of GMO soybeans, transcending geographical boundaries to influence the demand for LPGas in Poland. This unexpected connection might seem like a soy-prise, but it aligns seamlessly with the tenets of Smith et al.'s research, showcasing the far-reaching implications of biotechnological advancements in agriculture.

Similarly, Doe and Jones' comprehensive analysis of LPGas consumption illuminates the integral role of this energy source, echoing the significant relationship we have unveiled between GMO soybeans in Missouri and LPGas demand in Poland. While the soy-to-LPGas connection may initially appear whimsical, our results solidify its relevance in the realm of international energy dynamics, turning the soy-lutions of Doe and Jones into gas-tacular realities.

Delving deeper into the soy-ful musings and gas-tating inquiries, our findings align with Pollan's exploration of the interplay between agriculture, genetically modified crops, and human consumption. The tangled web of soybean cultivation and LPGas consumption transcends mere empirical observation, inviting contemplation of the broader societal implications and global ramifications of these seemingly divergent entities. As such, our study stands as a testament to the soy-ful odyssey that bridges disciplines and transcends the confines of conventional agricultural and energy narratives.

In essence, our research unearths a soy-to-LPGas saga that defies traditional categorizations, inviting both scholarly scrutiny and light-hearted revelry. The whimsical odyssey of soybean production and energy consumption is, in fact, a nuanced interplay of global significance, echoing the irrepressible spirit of inquiry that infuses the pursuit of knowledge. As we navigate the soy-ful tempest in a teapot and savor the gas-tly revelations, it becomes increasingly clear that the world of agricultural and energy connections is more than just a hill of beans—it's the soy to the world.

Stay tuned for a conclusion that encapsulates the soy-ful and gas-tacular journey we've embarked upon.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Missouri and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Poland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Soy to the World: Exploring the GMO-Soybean and LPGas Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the soy-surreal world of agricultural and energy connections, exploring the tangled web of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPGas) in Poland. Our research team used data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration to peel back the layers of this mysterious alliance. The correlation coefficient of 0.9477541 and p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022 left us bean-counting with excitement. We unraveled the sprawling tendrils of GMO-soybean production and their curious link to the demand for LPGas in a transcontinental twist that's more than just a tempest in a teapot. So, hold onto your soy latte, we're about to soy-ve into an off-bean area of research and unearth some gas-tly marvelous findings.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of agriculture and energy may seem like two peas in a pod, but the connection between GMO-soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPGas) in Poland is more like a case of "soy meets world." While it may sound like a soy-operatic tale, the relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities has piqued the curiosity of researchers and raised eyebrows in both agricultural and energy sectors.
On the one hand, we have the GMO-soybeans, the prodigal poster child of modern agriculture, with its genetically engineered resilience and prolific productivity. On the other hand, we have LPGas, the lesser-known but indispensable player in the energy market, keeping the flames of industry and commerce burning bright in countries like Poland.
The intertwining of these two seemingly disparate elements has sparked a whirlwind of speculation. Are the GMO-soybeans in Missouri whispering secrets to the LPGas in Poland, creating a symbiotic relationship that defies conventional wisdom? Or is this all just a soyful tempest in a LPGas canister?
In this paper, we delve into the tangled vines of GMO-soybean production and its unlikely dance with the demand for LPGas in Poland, aiming to shed light on the clandestine connections and unveil the gassy truths that lie beneath the surface. Get ready to peel back the layers of this soy-prise and unearth some gas-tly magnificent revelations.
So, grab your soy latte and buckle up, because we're about to embark on a journey that's more than just a hill of beans—it's the soy to the world.
Let's connect the dots in this soy-ful and gas-tating exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a strong correlation between the use of GMO soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPGas) in Poland over the period from 2000 to 2022. Our research team found a correlation coefficient of 0.9477541, indicating a robust positive relationship between the two variables. The high R-squared value of 0.8982379 suggests that approximately 89.82% of the variance in LPGas consumption in Poland can be explained by the use of GMO soybeans in Missouri. The p-value of less than 0.01 further confirms the significance of this relationship, providing compelling evidence to support our findings.
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the clear correlation between the use of GMO soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of LPGas in Poland. The points on the plot form a tightly clustered pattern, emphasizing the strength of the relationship between these seemingly disparate elements. This visual representation reinforces the statistical indicators and offers a tangible illustration of the link we have uncovered.
The findings from this analysis present a compelling soy-nario, highlighting the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and energy consumption on an international scale. While it may seem like a soy-prise, the data speaks volumes about the intricate connections that weave through the fabric of our global ecosystem.
In sum, our research has unveiled a gas-tly marvelous revelation, shedding light on the clandestine correlations between GMO soybean production in Missouri and the demand for LPGas in Poland. This soy-ful tempest in a teapot has certainly sparked a flurry of speculation, but the data unequivocally supports the existence of this unique relationship. As we digest these findings, it's clear that the world of agricultural and energy connections is more than just a hill of beans—it's the soy to the world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has brought to light the fascinating connection between GMO soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPGas) in Poland. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9477541 and a p-value of less than 0.01 have left us bean-counting in disbelief at the soy-nificant relationship we have uncovered. It's clear that the bond between these seemingly unrelated elements is not just a tempest in a teapot but a soy-lid reality that defies conventional wisdom.

The findings from this study not only highlight the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and energy consumption on an international scale but also provide a gas-tating revelation about the intricate connections that span continents. It's as if the GMO soybeans in Missouri have been whispering secrets to the LPGas in Poland, creating a symbiotic relationship that's more than just a hill of beans.

As we wrap up this soy-ful exploration, we can confidently say that the world of agricultural and energy connections is more complex and intertwined than we ever imagined. It's a soy-opera of sorts, with the GMO soybeans and LPGas taking center stage in this gas-tly marvelous production. And just like any good show, our research has provided closure on this particular act—no more research is needed in this area. It's time to soy-ta-lavista to this soy-perb discovery!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Soy to the World: Exploring the GMO-Soybean and LPGas Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Alchemy


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Soy to the World: Exploring the GMO-Soybean and LPGas Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Sustainable Agriculture and Ethical Food Practices


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Soy to the World: Exploring the GMO-Soybean and LPGas Connection with an abstract of This study delves into the soy-surreal world of agricultural and energy connections, exploring the tangled web of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPGas) in Poland. Our research team used data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration to peel back the layers of this mysterious alliance. The correlation coefficient of 0.9477541 and p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022 left us bean-counting with excitement. We unraveled the sprawling tendrils of GMO-soybean production and their curious link to the demand for LPGas in a transcontinental twist that's more than just a tempest in a teapot. So, hold onto your soy latte, we're about to soy-ve into an off-bean area of research and unearth some gas-tly marvelous findings.

ChatGPT:

GMO soybean, LPGas, soybean production, GMO soybean Missouri, Liquefied Petroleum Gas Poland, agricultural energy connections, GMO soybean consumption, genetically modified soybeans, USDA data, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, soybean demand, transcontinental connection, soybean research, GMO soybean production analysis, LPGas consumption pattern.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in soybeans in Missouri
Detailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in Missouri that are genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in Missouri

Liquefied petroleum gas used in Poland
Detailed data title: Volume of liquefied petroleum gas used consumed in Poland in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Liquefied petroleum gas used in Poland

Correlation r = 0.9477541 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8982379 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 89.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Liquefied petroleum gas used in Poland) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in Missouri) over the 23 years from 2000 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.9E-12. 0.0000000000068628598899738110
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 6.9E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 145,711,848,418 random variables You don't actually need 145 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.88, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in soybeans in Missouri (GMO soybeans %)6269728387899391928994919190918789879194959396
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Poland (Million Barrels/Day)34.915342.035651.665863.235670.360775.26380.183681.86380.857979.104178.172676.243875.426274.621975.419277.032979.789683.684.857588.564479.524681.517879.9562




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([62,69,72,83,87,89,93,91,92,89,94,91,91,90,91,87,89,87,91,94,95,93,96,])
array_2 = np.array([34.9153,42.0356,51.6658,63.2356,70.3607,75.263,80.1836,81.863,80.8579,79.1041,78.1726,76.2438,75.4262,74.6219,75.4192,77.0329,79.7896,83.6,84.8575,88.5644,79.5246,81.5178,79.9562,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in soybeans in Missouri"
array_2_name = "Liquefied petroleum gas used in Poland"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 1490 · Black Variable ID: 821 · Red Variable ID: 24821
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0