about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,359 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Davin and the second variable is Fossil fuel use in Luxembourg.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Every time someone named Davin is born, a commemorative barrel of oil is secretly buried in Luxembourg in celebration. It's a little-known tradition that has been fueling the nation for decades.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Realistic] Generate an image of a bustling city park in Luxembourg, where a group of children are playing. The focus is on a boy named Davin, who is surrounded by his friends. They are all excitedly playing with toy cars and trucks, symbolizing their love for fossil fuel-powered vehicles. The scene should capture the children's enthusiastic play and Davin's popularity among his peers as they gather around him, expressing their love for fossil fuel use through their toys. The image should be vibrant and bustling with energy, showing the joy and liveliness of the children's play. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Davin and Fossil fuel use in Luxembourg. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute cartoon Cubism Macabre Realistic Concept art
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Davin and Fossil fuel use in Luxembourg together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling city in Luxembourg, a group of children are playing in a park. One of the kids, named Davin, is surrounded by his friends who are all excitedly playing with toy cars and trucks, symbolizing their love for fossil fuel-powered vehicles. The scene shows Davin's popularity among his peers as they all gather around him, playing and laughing together while expressing their enthusiasm for fossil fuel use through their toys.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling city in Luxembourg, a group of children are playing in a park. One of the kids, named Davin, is surrounded by his friends who are all excitedly playing with toy cars and trucks, symbolizing their love for fossil fuel-powered vehicles. The scene shows Davin's popularity among his peers as they all gather around him, playing and laughing together while expressing their enthusiasm for fossil fuel use through their toys. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Realistic] Generate an image of a bustling city park in Luxembourg, where a group of children are playing. The focus is on a boy named Davin, who is surrounded by his friends. They are all excitedly playing with toy cars and trucks, symbolizing their love for fossil fuel-powered vehicles. The scene should capture the children's enthusiastic play and Davin's popularity among his peers as they gather around him, expressing their love for fossil fuel use through their toys. The image should be vibrant and bustling with energy, showing the joy and liveliness of the children's play.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the first name Davin positively influenced Fossil fuel use in Luxembourg.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fuel for Thought: The Davin Dilemma - Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Davin and Fossil Fuel Use in Luxembourg

The Journal of Quirky Social Science Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Davin and Fossil fuel use in Luxembourg. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9195239 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Fuel for Thought: The Davin Dilemma - Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Davin and Fossil Fuel Use in Luxembourg

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unlikely link between the popularity of the name Davin and fossil fuel utilization in the picturesque country of Luxembourg. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to answer the burning question: Is there a significant relationship between the first name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in Luxembourg?

In an endeavor laden with more jest than expected, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9195239 and a jaw-dropping p-value less than 0.01 for the time range spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there is a robust association between the popularity of the name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in Luxembourg, introducing a new dimension to the age-old question of nature versus nurture. We invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in contemplating the curious interplay between moniker popularity and environmental choices, and between chuckles, delve deeper into the unexpected intersections of society and energy usage.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Davin and Fossil fuel use in Luxembourg. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fuel for Thought: The Davin Dilemma - Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Davin and Fossil Fuel Use in Luxembourg

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unlikely link between the popularity of the name Davin and fossil fuel utilization in the picturesque country of Luxembourg. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to answer the burning question: Is there a significant relationship between the first name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in Luxembourg?

In an endeavor laden with more jest than expected, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9195239 and a jaw-dropping p-value less than 0.01 for the time range spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there is a robust association between the popularity of the name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in Luxembourg, introducing a new dimension to the age-old question of nature versus nurture. We invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in contemplating the curious interplay between moniker popularity and environmental choices, and between chuckles, delve deeper into the unexpected intersections of society and energy usage.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
**[[INTRODUCTION]]**

Ah, the heady world of research, where the serious and the absurd collide in a dance of statistical significance and unexpected correlations. In this delightful romp through the annals of sociology and environmental science, we find ourselves exploring the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in the grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

As researchers, we often find ourselves lost in a maze of variables, equations, and p-values, but rarely do we stumble upon a conundrum as whimsical as this one. The name Davin, a moniker denoting both individual identity and a hint of parental creativity, has led us on a merry chase through the hallowed halls of data analysis and linguistic ponderings. And when juxtaposed with the gentle hum of fossil fuel utilization in the picturesque setting of Luxembourg, the result is a symphony of mirth and scientific intrigue.

At first glance, one might assume that the popularity of a name and the consumption of ancient relics of the Earth's primordial past would have as much in common as a cheetah and a pancake, but rest assured, dear reader, the plot thickens. It is in these moments of unexpected discovery that we find the heart of scientific inquiry - the unearthing of connections where none were previously suspected, the raising of eyebrows, and the odd knowing nod shared between colleagues.

With a twinkle in our eye and a spreadsheet full of numbers, we set out on a journey to unravel the Davin dilemma. Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration, a treasure trove of names and their social sway, and wielding information from the Energy Information Administration, a bastion of energy knowledge, we sought to answer the burning question: Is there a substantial relationship between the first name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in the charming environs of Luxembourg?

But, of course, dear reader, we could not resist adding a dash of humor to our pursuit. It is not every day that one gets to traverse the hallowed halls of academia with the gleeful intention of discerning why a particular name seems to have the energy of an oil well behind it. And so, with data in hand and a smile on our faces, we invite you to join us in this whimsical exploration of the unexpected intersections of society and energy usage, for the Davin dilemma is nothing if not a delightful puzzle in the grand mosaic of academic discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Davin and Fossil fuel use in Luxembourg. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fuel for Thought: The Davin Dilemma - Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Davin and Fossil Fuel Use in Luxembourg

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unlikely link between the popularity of the name Davin and fossil fuel utilization in the picturesque country of Luxembourg. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to answer the burning question: Is there a significant relationship between the first name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in Luxembourg?

In an endeavor laden with more jest than expected, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9195239 and a jaw-dropping p-value less than 0.01 for the time range spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there is a robust association between the popularity of the name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in Luxembourg, introducing a new dimension to the age-old question of nature versus nurture. We invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in contemplating the curious interplay between moniker popularity and environmental choices, and between chuckles, delve deeper into the unexpected intersections of society and energy usage.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the heady world of research, where the serious and the absurd collide in a dance of statistical significance and unexpected correlations. In this delightful romp through the annals of sociology and environmental science, we find ourselves exploring the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in the grand Duchy of Luxembourg.
As researchers, we often find ourselves lost in a maze of variables, equations, and p-values, but rarely do we stumble upon a conundrum as whimsical as this one. The name Davin, a moniker denoting both individual identity and a hint of parental creativity, has led us on a merry chase through the hallowed halls of data analysis and linguistic ponderings. And when juxtaposed with the gentle hum of fossil fuel utilization in the picturesque setting of Luxembourg, the result is a symphony of mirth and scientific intrigue.
At first glance, one might assume that the popularity of a name and the consumption of ancient relics of the Earth's primordial past would have as much in common as a cheetah and a pancake, but rest assured, dear reader, the plot thickens. It is in these moments of unexpected discovery that we find the heart of scientific inquiry - the unearthing of connections where none were previously suspected, the raising of eyebrows, and the odd knowing nod shared between colleagues.
With a twinkle in our eye and a spreadsheet full of numbers, we set out on a journey to unravel the Davin dilemma. Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration, a treasure trove of names and their social sway, and wielding information from the Energy Information Administration, a bastion of energy knowledge, we sought to answer the burning question: Is there a substantial relationship between the first name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in the charming environs of Luxembourg?
But, of course, dear reader, we could not resist adding a dash of humor to our pursuit. It is not every day that one gets to traverse the hallowed halls of academia with the gleeful intention of discerning why a particular name seems to have the energy of an oil well behind it. And so, with data in hand and a smile on our faces, we invite you to join us in this whimsical exploration of the unexpected intersections of society and energy usage, for the Davin dilemma is nothing if not a delightful puzzle in the grand mosaic of academic discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The pursuit of understanding the connection between the popularity of the first name Davin and fossil fuel use in Luxembourg has led researchers through an eclectic mix of studies and findings. In Smith's groundbreaking work "Names and Trends: A Sociolinguistic Analysis," the authors find a fascinating correlation between naming patterns and societal shifts, laying the groundwork for our exploration into the impact of moniker popularity on environmental behavior. Building on this foundation, Doe's seminal paper "Fueling the Flames: An Examination of Energy Consumption in Urban Environments" sheds light on the multifaceted factors that influence energy use, hinting at the possibility of unexpected influencers in the realm of naming conventions.

Jones, in "Energy Economics: A Comprehensive Analysis," delves into the complex interplay of economic drivers in energy consumption, providing a broader context for our investigation into the curious correlation between the name Davin and fossil fuel utilization. With these serious studies as our backdrop, we step into a whimsical world where unexpected twists and turns await.

Turning our attention to non-fiction works related to our research, "The Name Book" by Dorothy Astoria offers a wealth of insights into the social implications of naming trends, while "The Energy of Names" by David Ault provides an intriguing exploration of the potential energetic resonance of names, perhaps shedding light on the mysterious allure of the name Davin in relation to fuel usage.

In a departure from conventional scholarly pursuits, we venture into the realm of fiction where names and energy intertwine in unexpected ways. J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets" introduces us to the fabled Parseltongue, a magical language that seemingly holds sway over serpents and may offer parallels to the influence of names on seemingly unrelated phenomena. Furthermore, Isaac Asimov's "Foundation" series presents a thought-provoking narrative on societal trends and their unforeseen impacts, prompting us to ponder the potential ripple effects of Davin's popularity on energy dynamics in Luxembourg.

Amidst our scholarly endeavors, the ever-relevant Internet memes "Distracted Boyfriend" and "This Is Fine" serve as humorous reminders of the unexpected twists and turns that often accompany research pursuits. Like the distracted boyfriend, we find ourselves drawn to surprising correlations, and when faced with unusual findings, we don the mantle of "This Is Fine" to humorously navigate the uncharted territory of the Davin dilemma.

With a nod to the serious and a wink to the whimsical, we invite our esteemed colleagues to accompany us on this delightful journey as we unravel the enigmatic ties between the name Davin and fossil fuel consumption in Luxembourg.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Davin and Fossil fuel use in Luxembourg. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fuel for Thought: The Davin Dilemma - Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Davin and Fossil Fuel Use in Luxembourg

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unlikely link between the popularity of the name Davin and fossil fuel utilization in the picturesque country of Luxembourg. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to answer the burning question: Is there a significant relationship between the first name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in Luxembourg?

In an endeavor laden with more jest than expected, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9195239 and a jaw-dropping p-value less than 0.01 for the time range spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there is a robust association between the popularity of the name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in Luxembourg, introducing a new dimension to the age-old question of nature versus nurture. We invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in contemplating the curious interplay between moniker popularity and environmental choices, and between chuckles, delve deeper into the unexpected intersections of society and energy usage.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the heady world of research, where the serious and the absurd collide in a dance of statistical significance and unexpected correlations. In this delightful romp through the annals of sociology and environmental science, we find ourselves exploring the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in the grand Duchy of Luxembourg.
As researchers, we often find ourselves lost in a maze of variables, equations, and p-values, but rarely do we stumble upon a conundrum as whimsical as this one. The name Davin, a moniker denoting both individual identity and a hint of parental creativity, has led us on a merry chase through the hallowed halls of data analysis and linguistic ponderings. And when juxtaposed with the gentle hum of fossil fuel utilization in the picturesque setting of Luxembourg, the result is a symphony of mirth and scientific intrigue.
At first glance, one might assume that the popularity of a name and the consumption of ancient relics of the Earth's primordial past would have as much in common as a cheetah and a pancake, but rest assured, dear reader, the plot thickens. It is in these moments of unexpected discovery that we find the heart of scientific inquiry - the unearthing of connections where none were previously suspected, the raising of eyebrows, and the odd knowing nod shared between colleagues.
With a twinkle in our eye and a spreadsheet full of numbers, we set out on a journey to unravel the Davin dilemma. Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration, a treasure trove of names and their social sway, and wielding information from the Energy Information Administration, a bastion of energy knowledge, we sought to answer the burning question: Is there a substantial relationship between the first name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in the charming environs of Luxembourg?
But, of course, dear reader, we could not resist adding a dash of humor to our pursuit. It is not every day that one gets to traverse the hallowed halls of academia with the gleeful intention of discerning why a particular name seems to have the energy of an oil well behind it. And so, with data in hand and a smile on our faces, we invite you to join us in this whimsical exploration of the unexpected intersections of society and energy usage, for the Davin dilemma is nothing if not a delightful puzzle in the grand mosaic of academic discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the mysterious connection between the popularity of the first name Davin and fossil fuel use in Luxembourg, our research team conducted a delightful blend of statistical analysis and unanticipated giggles. With an air of earnestness and a twinkle in our eyes, we embarked on a journey through the annals of data collection and analysis, striving to shed light on this peculiar relationship.

Data Collection:

The first step in our whimsical expedition involved collecting data from diverse sources, with the backbone of our research relying on information from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. We scoured these treasure troves of information, traversing the digital landscape from 1980 to 2021, in search of the elusive link between the name Davin and fossil fuel consumption in Luxembourg.

Statistical Analysis:

Upon amassing the necessary data, our team gleefully dived into the statistical analysis, employing a robust assortment of tools and techniques to extract meaning from the numbers. From charming scatterplots to enchanting regression analyses, we navigated the complex waters of statistical inference, all while maintaining a steady flow of wit and wonder.

Correlation Coefficients and P-Values:

In our pursuit of scientific discovery, we calculated the correlation coefficient between the popularity of the name Davin and fossil fuel use, resulting in a figure so astonishing it nearly leaped off the page – a staggering 0.9195239. And to our great amusement, the p-value associated with this correlation fell below the hallowed threshold of 0.01, unleashing a wave of giddy excitement among our team.

Quirky Observations and Unexpected Conclusions:

In the delightful process of unraveling the Davin dilemma, we stumbled upon a series of quirky observations and unexpected conclusions that tickled our scientific fancy. As we traversed the landscape of data points, we couldn't help but marvel at the intriguing dance between a seemingly innocuous first name and the intricate tapestry of energy usage in Luxembourg.

To capture the essence of our lighthearted exploration, we also delved into the realm of qualitative analysis, juggling the endearing anecdotes of Davins and the captivating tales of fossil fuels with unparalleled finesse.

In summary, our methodology is a whimsical concoction of rigorous statistical analysis, a sprinkle of delightful surprises, and a generous dose of scientific mirth, culminating in an exhilarating romp through the unlikeliest of correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Davin and Fossil fuel use in Luxembourg. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9195239, r-squared of 0.8455241, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fuel for Thought: The Davin Dilemma - Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Davin and Fossil Fuel Use in Luxembourg

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unlikely link between the popularity of the name Davin and fossil fuel utilization in the picturesque country of Luxembourg. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to answer the burning question: Is there a significant relationship between the first name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in Luxembourg?

In an endeavor laden with more jest than expected, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9195239 and a jaw-dropping p-value less than 0.01 for the time range spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there is a robust association between the popularity of the name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in Luxembourg, introducing a new dimension to the age-old question of nature versus nurture. We invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in contemplating the curious interplay between moniker popularity and environmental choices, and between chuckles, delve deeper into the unexpected intersections of society and energy usage.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the heady world of research, where the serious and the absurd collide in a dance of statistical significance and unexpected correlations. In this delightful romp through the annals of sociology and environmental science, we find ourselves exploring the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in the grand Duchy of Luxembourg.
As researchers, we often find ourselves lost in a maze of variables, equations, and p-values, but rarely do we stumble upon a conundrum as whimsical as this one. The name Davin, a moniker denoting both individual identity and a hint of parental creativity, has led us on a merry chase through the hallowed halls of data analysis and linguistic ponderings. And when juxtaposed with the gentle hum of fossil fuel utilization in the picturesque setting of Luxembourg, the result is a symphony of mirth and scientific intrigue.
At first glance, one might assume that the popularity of a name and the consumption of ancient relics of the Earth's primordial past would have as much in common as a cheetah and a pancake, but rest assured, dear reader, the plot thickens. It is in these moments of unexpected discovery that we find the heart of scientific inquiry - the unearthing of connections where none were previously suspected, the raising of eyebrows, and the odd knowing nod shared between colleagues.
With a twinkle in our eye and a spreadsheet full of numbers, we set out on a journey to unravel the Davin dilemma. Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration, a treasure trove of names and their social sway, and wielding information from the Energy Information Administration, a bastion of energy knowledge, we sought to answer the burning question: Is there a substantial relationship between the first name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in the charming environs of Luxembourg?
But, of course, dear reader, we could not resist adding a dash of humor to our pursuit. It is not every day that one gets to traverse the hallowed halls of academia with the gleeful intention of discerning why a particular name seems to have the energy of an oil well behind it. And so, with data in hand and a smile on our faces, we invite you to join us in this whimsical exploration of the unexpected intersections of society and energy usage, for the Davin dilemma is nothing if not a delightful puzzle in the grand mosaic of academic discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon delving into the depths of data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we emerged with findings that may have seemed as unlikely as finding a four-leaf clover in a coal mine. Our research unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9195239, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8455241, and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2021. These results left us feeling more awe-struck than a scientist stumbling upon a unicorn in the laboratory.

As seen in Figure 1, our scatterplot reveals a robust relationship between the popularity of the name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in Luxembourg. The data points align like stars in the scientific sky, painting a portrait of unexpected affinity between the nomenclature and the fuel consumption. It seems that the name Davin may hold more clout than initially anticipated, wielding an influence that echoes through the alleyways of energy utilization.

Described in terms that even the most reticent statistician would appreciate, the strength of this correlation is about as clear as a cloudless day – a surprising revelation in a landscape abundant with variables and uncertainties. These results invite us to reconsider the notion of causality in the realm of nomenclature and energy consumption, and perhaps even ponder whether the choice of name could have an inadvertent impact on environmental decisions.

This correlation, with implications as unconventional as a penguin in a desert, sheds light on the curious interplay between social phenomena and environmental choices. It urges us to don our thinking caps and consider the unexpected ripple effects that names may have on societal behavior, and more broadly, the unseen forces that shape our collective decisions.

In light of these findings, we are left to ponder the enigmatic dance of the Davin dilemma, as it waltzes through the scientific landscape with a flamboyance that rivals even the boldest of statistical outliers. Our results beckon us to embrace the whimsical, the unexpected, and the delightfully absurd, reminding us that the intersection of science and society may yet hold more surprises than previously thought.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Davin and Fossil fuel use in Luxembourg. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Fuel for Thought: The Davin Dilemma - Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Davin and Fossil Fuel Use in Luxembourg

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unlikely link between the popularity of the name Davin and fossil fuel utilization in the picturesque country of Luxembourg. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to answer the burning question: Is there a significant relationship between the first name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in Luxembourg?

In an endeavor laden with more jest than expected, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9195239 and a jaw-dropping p-value less than 0.01 for the time range spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there is a robust association between the popularity of the name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in Luxembourg, introducing a new dimension to the age-old question of nature versus nurture. We invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in contemplating the curious interplay between moniker popularity and environmental choices, and between chuckles, delve deeper into the unexpected intersections of society and energy usage.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The pursuit of understanding the connection between the popularity of the first name Davin and fossil fuel use in Luxembourg has led researchers through an eclectic mix of studies and findings. In Smith's groundbreaking work "Names and Trends: A Sociolinguistic Analysis," the authors find a fascinating correlation between naming patterns and societal shifts, laying the groundwork for our exploration into the impact of moniker popularity on environmental behavior. Building on this foundation, Doe's seminal paper "Fueling the Flames: An Examination of Energy Consumption in Urban Environments" sheds light on the multifaceted factors that influence energy use, hinting at the possibility of unexpected influencers in the realm of naming conventions.
Jones, in "Energy Economics: A Comprehensive Analysis," delves into the complex interplay of economic drivers in energy consumption, providing a broader context for our investigation into the curious correlation between the name Davin and fossil fuel utilization. With these serious studies as our backdrop, we step into a whimsical world where unexpected twists and turns await.
Turning our attention to non-fiction works related to our research, "The Name Book" by Dorothy Astoria offers a wealth of insights into the social implications of naming trends, while "The Energy of Names" by David Ault provides an intriguing exploration of the potential energetic resonance of names, perhaps shedding light on the mysterious allure of the name Davin in relation to fuel usage.
In a departure from conventional scholarly pursuits, we venture into the realm of fiction where names and energy intertwine in unexpected ways. J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets" introduces us to the fabled Parseltongue, a magical language that seemingly holds sway over serpents and may offer parallels to the influence of names on seemingly unrelated phenomena. Furthermore, Isaac Asimov's "Foundation" series presents a thought-provoking narrative on societal trends and their unforeseen impacts, prompting us to ponder the potential ripple effects of Davin's popularity on energy dynamics in Luxembourg.
Amidst our scholarly endeavors, the ever-relevant Internet memes "Distracted Boyfriend" and "This Is Fine" serve as humorous reminders of the unexpected twists and turns that often accompany research pursuits. Like the distracted boyfriend, we find ourselves drawn to surprising correlations, and when faced with unusual findings, we don the mantle of "This Is Fine" to humorously navigate the uncharted territory of the Davin dilemma.
With a nod to the serious and a wink to the whimsical, we invite our esteemed colleagues to accompany us on this delightful journey as we unravel the enigmatic ties between the name Davin and fossil fuel consumption in Luxembourg.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon delving into the depths of data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we emerged with findings that may have seemed as unlikely as finding a four-leaf clover in a coal mine. Our research unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9195239, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8455241, and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2021. These results left us feeling more awe-struck than a scientist stumbling upon a unicorn in the laboratory.
As seen in Figure 1, our scatterplot reveals a robust relationship between the popularity of the name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in Luxembourg. The data points align like stars in the scientific sky, painting a portrait of unexpected affinity between the nomenclature and the fuel consumption. It seems that the name Davin may hold more clout than initially anticipated, wielding an influence that echoes through the alleyways of energy utilization.
Described in terms that even the most reticent statistician would appreciate, the strength of this correlation is about as clear as a cloudless day – a surprising revelation in a landscape abundant with variables and uncertainties. These results invite us to reconsider the notion of causality in the realm of nomenclature and energy consumption, and perhaps even ponder whether the choice of name could have an inadvertent impact on environmental decisions.
This correlation, with implications as unconventional as a penguin in a desert, sheds light on the curious interplay between social phenomena and environmental choices. It urges us to don our thinking caps and consider the unexpected ripple effects that names may have on societal behavior, and more broadly, the unseen forces that shape our collective decisions.
In light of these findings, we are left to ponder the enigmatic dance of the Davin dilemma, as it waltzes through the scientific landscape with a flamboyance that rivals even the boldest of statistical outliers. Our results beckon us to embrace the whimsical, the unexpected, and the delightfully absurd, reminding us that the intersection of science and society may yet hold more surprises than previously thought.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our exploration into the correlation between the popularity of the name Davin and fossil fuel consumption in Luxembourg have left us feeling giddier than a chemist discovering a new element. Our findings, which revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9195239 and a p-value less than 0.01, affirm the unexpected and daresay, comical, connection between nomenclature and energy behavior. It seems that the name Davin carries more weight than an unsuspecting neutron, influencing the fossil fuel consumption landscape with a flair that rivals the boldest of chemical reactions.

Our endeavor, filled with more chuckles than a comedy night at a statistics convention, builds upon the foundation laid by Smith's analysis on naming patterns and societal shifts, and Doe's examination of energy consumption in urban environments. The unexpected twists and turns that accompany the Davin dilemma echo the whimsical world of Rowling's magical language in "Harry Potter" and Asimov's narrative on societal trends in "Foundation." Much like the charmingly distracting "Distracted Boyfriend" meme, our research draws attention to surprising correlations, all while navigating the enigmatic ties between the Davin name and fossil fuel consumption in Luxembourg.

The robust correlation we uncovered is as clear as a cloudless day and perhaps as surprising as finding a unicorn in the laboratory. Our scatterplot paints a picture of unexpected affinity between the name Davin and fossil fuel consumption, akin to a scientific discovery that leaves one more awe-struck than a physicist stumbling upon an anomalous particle. The unexpected clout of the name Davin in the realm of energy utilization beckons us to ponder whether our chosen monikers may inadvertently influence our environmental decisions, reminding us that even the most reticent statistician can appreciate the whimsical dance of data analysis.

In the spirit of embracing the delightfully absurd, our findings invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in reveling in the enigmatic dance of the Davin dilemma, where societal behavior and environmental choices intersect in ways as unexpected as a penguin in a desert. As we continue to unravel the curious interplay between nomenclature and energy consumption, we are reminded that the scientific landscape may yet hold more surprises than previously thought, and that the laughter and whimsy of unexpected correlations are as integral to research as the pursuit of knowledge itself.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Davin and Fossil fuel use in Luxembourg. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Fuel for Thought: The Davin Dilemma - Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Davin and Fossil Fuel Use in Luxembourg

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unlikely link between the popularity of the name Davin and fossil fuel utilization in the picturesque country of Luxembourg. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to answer the burning question: Is there a significant relationship between the first name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in Luxembourg?

In an endeavor laden with more jest than expected, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9195239 and a jaw-dropping p-value less than 0.01 for the time range spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there is a robust association between the popularity of the name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in Luxembourg, introducing a new dimension to the age-old question of nature versus nurture. We invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in contemplating the curious interplay between moniker popularity and environmental choices, and between chuckles, delve deeper into the unexpected intersections of society and energy usage.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the heady world of research, where the serious and the absurd collide in a dance of statistical significance and unexpected correlations. In this delightful romp through the annals of sociology and environmental science, we find ourselves exploring the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in the grand Duchy of Luxembourg.
As researchers, we often find ourselves lost in a maze of variables, equations, and p-values, but rarely do we stumble upon a conundrum as whimsical as this one. The name Davin, a moniker denoting both individual identity and a hint of parental creativity, has led us on a merry chase through the hallowed halls of data analysis and linguistic ponderings. And when juxtaposed with the gentle hum of fossil fuel utilization in the picturesque setting of Luxembourg, the result is a symphony of mirth and scientific intrigue.
At first glance, one might assume that the popularity of a name and the consumption of ancient relics of the Earth's primordial past would have as much in common as a cheetah and a pancake, but rest assured, dear reader, the plot thickens. It is in these moments of unexpected discovery that we find the heart of scientific inquiry - the unearthing of connections where none were previously suspected, the raising of eyebrows, and the odd knowing nod shared between colleagues.
With a twinkle in our eye and a spreadsheet full of numbers, we set out on a journey to unravel the Davin dilemma. Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration, a treasure trove of names and their social sway, and wielding information from the Energy Information Administration, a bastion of energy knowledge, we sought to answer the burning question: Is there a substantial relationship between the first name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in the charming environs of Luxembourg?
But, of course, dear reader, we could not resist adding a dash of humor to our pursuit. It is not every day that one gets to traverse the hallowed halls of academia with the gleeful intention of discerning why a particular name seems to have the energy of an oil well behind it. And so, with data in hand and a smile on our faces, we invite you to join us in this whimsical exploration of the unexpected intersections of society and energy usage, for the Davin dilemma is nothing if not a delightful puzzle in the grand mosaic of academic discourse.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon delving into the depths of data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we emerged with findings that may have seemed as unlikely as finding a four-leaf clover in a coal mine. Our research unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9195239, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8455241, and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2021. These results left us feeling more awe-struck than a scientist stumbling upon a unicorn in the laboratory.
As seen in Figure 1, our scatterplot reveals a robust relationship between the popularity of the name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in Luxembourg. The data points align like stars in the scientific sky, painting a portrait of unexpected affinity between the nomenclature and the fuel consumption. It seems that the name Davin may hold more clout than initially anticipated, wielding an influence that echoes through the alleyways of energy utilization.
Described in terms that even the most reticent statistician would appreciate, the strength of this correlation is about as clear as a cloudless day – a surprising revelation in a landscape abundant with variables and uncertainties. These results invite us to reconsider the notion of causality in the realm of nomenclature and energy consumption, and perhaps even ponder whether the choice of name could have an inadvertent impact on environmental decisions.
This correlation, with implications as unconventional as a penguin in a desert, sheds light on the curious interplay between social phenomena and environmental choices. It urges us to don our thinking caps and consider the unexpected ripple effects that names may have on societal behavior, and more broadly, the unseen forces that shape our collective decisions.
In light of these findings, we are left to ponder the enigmatic dance of the Davin dilemma, as it waltzes through the scientific landscape with a flamboyance that rivals even the boldest of statistical outliers. Our results beckon us to embrace the whimsical, the unexpected, and the delightfully absurd, reminding us that the intersection of science and society may yet hold more surprises than previously thought.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our foray into the Davin dilemma has proven to be a delightful romp through the whimsical world of research. Who would have thought that a name could hold such sway over the consumption of fossil fuels in the idyllic setting of Luxembourg? It seems that the moniker Davin, with its subtle charm and perhaps a hint of fossil fuel fervor, has indeed left an indelible mark on the energy habits of this quaint country, leading us to ponder if there's something in a name that stirs the engines of societal choices.

As we wrap up our escapade through the unexpected intersections of society and energy usage, we can't help but emphasize the sheer surprise and amusement that this correlation has brought to our scientific lens. The Davin dilemma may not only be a quirky anecdote for future scientific jamborees but also a cautionary tale about the uncharted territories of research, where one must always expect the unexpected.

As we bid adieu to the Davin dilemma, we dare say that no more research is needed in this area. After all, we've mined the data, fueled the discussions, and sparked new insights. It's time to let this quirky correlation rest, leaving future generations of researchers to uncover their own whimsical tales in the treasure trove of society and science.

And with that, we raise our test tubes to the Davin dilemma - a peculiar, pun-filled pilgrimage through the unexplored lands of statistical surprises and unlikely connections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fuel for Thought: The Davin Dilemma - Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Davin and Fossil Fuel Use in Luxembourg. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Social Science Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fuel for Thought: The Davin Dilemma - Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Davin and Fossil Fuel Use in Luxembourg. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Advanced Name-Based Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fuel for Thought: The Davin Dilemma - Exploring the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name Davin and Fossil Fuel Use in Luxembourg with an abstract of This paper investigates the unlikely link between the popularity of the name Davin and fossil fuel utilization in the picturesque country of Luxembourg. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to answer the burning question: Is there a significant relationship between the first name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in Luxembourg?
In an endeavor laden with more jest than expected, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9195239 and a jaw-dropping p-value less than 0.01 for the time range spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there is a robust association between the popularity of the name Davin and the consumption of fossil fuels in Luxembourg, introducing a new dimension to the age-old question of nature versus nurture. We invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in contemplating the curious interplay between moniker popularity and environmental choices, and between chuckles, delve deeper into the unexpected intersections of society and energy usage.

ChatGPT:

Luxembourg, Davin, popularity, name, fossil fuel, consumption, correlation, fossil fuel utilization, Energy Information Administration, US Social Security Administration, correlation coefficient, p-value, nature versus nurture, environmental choices, societal influences, energy usage, moniker popularity

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Davin
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Davin
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Davin

Fossil fuel use in Luxembourg
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in Luxembourg in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in Luxembourg

Correlation r = 0.9195239 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8455241 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Fossil fuel use in Luxembourg) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Davin) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.1E-18. 0.0000000000000000081278352909
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 8.1E-16% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 123,033,989,273,824,160 random variables You don't actually need 123 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.85, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Davin (Babies born)1501371271461461281291241381271161401631511611581631871872032352713283863813964044544333983503492962762322251831461391059894
Fossil fuel use in Luxembourg (Billion kWh)0.7770.5970.4240.3640.4240.4120.4610.4450.4840.5240.4890.5440.5250.530.4230.3250.3180.2580.1830.1920.20210.626982.465622.46282.963822.920583.052182.72132.257882.672422.943792.387052.430971.465121.491070.8888030.3146560.2856760.2614820.2595480.2476980.260787




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([150,137,127,146,146,128,129,124,138,127,116,140,163,151,161,158,163,187,187,203,235,271,328,386,381,396,404,454,433,398,350,349,296,276,232,225,183,146,139,105,98,94,])
array_2 = np.array([0.777,0.597,0.424,0.364,0.424,0.412,0.461,0.445,0.484,0.524,0.489,0.544,0.525,0.53,0.423,0.325,0.318,0.258,0.183,0.192,0.2021,0.62698,2.46562,2.4628,2.96382,2.92058,3.05218,2.7213,2.25788,2.67242,2.94379,2.38705,2.43097,1.46512,1.49107,0.888803,0.314656,0.285676,0.261482,0.259548,0.247698,0.260787,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Davin"
array_2_name = "Fossil fuel use in Luxembourg"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 1359 · Black Variable ID: 3914 · Red Variable ID: 23797
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0